From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 02:39:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E07316A4BF; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 02:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0F043FF5; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 02:39:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from master.dougb.net (12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com[12.234.22.23](untrusted sender)) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2003090109390901500gjm0ke>; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:39:10 +0000 Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 02:39:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20030901093220.GC40983@sunbay.com> Message-ID: <20030901023511.L3776@znfgre.qbhto.arg> References: <20030901064424.GA30277@sunbay.com> <20030901065819.GB3811@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> <20030901.012249.118997606.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030901093220.GC40983@sunbay.com> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: kuku@physik.rwth-aachen.de cc: current@freebsd.org cc: "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: /lib symlinks problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 09:39:11 -0000 On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > I posted one approach to this today... touch a file right before you > > start installworld, then consider anything not newer than that file a > > candidate for disposal. There is currently something weird going on in > > /usr/lib though... a lot of the files don't have newer dates, I haven't > > tracked down why yet. > > > This is because static libraries are installed with -C. The reasoning > was like this: > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 02:15:56PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Ruslan Ermilov writes: > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 12:28:17PM -0800, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > > Log: > > > > Install static and profiled libraries with -C. > > > Um why, what's so special about them? > > > > They appear in dependency lists. This was discussed on -arch. Can you fill in a little more detail here? I really prefer the old behavior, not using -C. > This also will not work for anything that has not changed and is > installed with -C, that is includes, I posted my script to -current just today. I 'mv include include-old' to handle this. I also blow away /usr/share/man, since creating it from scratch is just as easy as trying to cleanse it. > rtld-elf, and some parts of /sys/boot. I haven't touched /boot yet, I'm not that brave. :) There are a couple other things that my script doesn't handle just on the basis of "newer than," but as a proof of concept it's quite functional. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection