Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:23:16 +0200 From: Marko Zec <zec@icir.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 127267 for review Message-ID: <200710082023.16517.zec@icir.org> In-Reply-To: <470A737C.3070805@elischer.org> References: <200710062222.l96MMM7U044733@repoman.freebsd.org> <470A737C.3070805@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 08 October 2007 20:14:20 Julian Elischer wrote: > Marko Zec wrote: > > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=127267 > > > > Change 127267 by zec@zec_tpx32 on 2007/10/06 22:21:31 > > > > Change the M_REMOTE_VNET mbuf flag so that it won't > > collide with the newly introduced M_NOFREE flag in -HEAD > > on next IFC. > > > > Apparently we are running out of bits in mbuf flags... > > > > Affected files ... > > > > .. //depot/projects/vimage/src/sys/sys/mbuf.h#8 edit > > > > Differences ... > > > > ==== //depot/projects/vimage/src/sys/sys/mbuf.h#8 (text+ko) ==== > > > > @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ > > #define M_LASTFRAG 0x2000 /* packet is last fragment */ > > #define M_VLANTAG 0x10000 /* ether_vtag is valid */ > > #define M_PROMISC 0x20000 /* packet was not for us */ > > -#define M_REMOTE_VNET 0x40000 /* mbuf crossed boundary between two > > vnets */ +#define M_REMOTE_VNET 0x80000 /* mbuf crossed boundary > > between two vnets */ > > > > /* > > * External buffer types: identify ext_buf type. > > nope > > I believe we still have > 0xfff00000 Umm you're right... Marko
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200710082023.16517.zec>