From owner-cvs-all Sun Apr 2 7:58:25 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from caspian.plutotech.com (caspian.plutotech.com [206.168.67.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD4837B833; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 07:58:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gibbs@caspian.plutotech.com) Received: from caspian.plutotech.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by caspian.plutotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA11447; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 08:59:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from gibbs@caspian.plutotech.com) Message-Id: <200004021459.IAA11447@caspian.plutotech.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_mib.c vfs_bio.c src/sys/sys buf.h In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 02 Apr 2000 01:26:58 -0800." <200004020926.BAA21432@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 08:59:17 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >phk 2000/04/02 01:26:58 PST > > Modified files: > sys/kern kern_mib.c vfs_bio.c > sys/sys buf.h > Log: > Draw the outline of "struct bio". Do we even want "buffer" to be part of the name? By the time the request gets down to a driver, shouldn't it look more like a header indicating the type of addresses in a chain of address length pairs? A slimmed down struct uio perhaps? -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message