From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 22:38:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D14106564A; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C538FC1A; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id o2OMc96w034539; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:38:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2OMc9H3034538; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:38:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:38:09 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Mark Linimon , kensmith@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100324223809.GA34342@alchemy.franken.de> References: <4BA9C0AC.3080801@wooh.hu> <20100324075709.GC13561@lonesome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100324075709.GC13561@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update(8) under sparc64? Why is it not available? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:38:12 -0000 On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:57:09AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > You're the first one to ask in a while. Since our userbase is small, > and developer time is limited, we've never set it up. > The last time this topic came up IMO there was quite some interest in getting this running but the showstopper was that cperciva@ said that a requirement for any platform supported by freebsd-update(8) would be that the build server is able to run buildworld in 1 hour at most (unfortunately I currently just can't find that email). My 4x1.5GHz V440 I originally intended for this purpose unfortunately still takes 72 minutes last time I checked. I suspect a 8x1.2GHz V880 would be able to meet this requirement but I simply can't afford the housing for such a beast. Ken, did the V880s at your university become available as intended some time ago? Marius