Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:26:05 +0200 From: Lothar Scholz <scholz@scriptolutions.com> To: Sujit K M <kmsujit@gmail.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org> Subject: Re[4]: Posix shared memory problem Message-ID: <981850520.20090511172605@scriptolutions.com> In-Reply-To: <74fe56020905110410y430bf76yacf5c5a308a99865@mail.gmail.com> References: <mit.lcs.mail.freebsd-arch/588815840.20090509203115@scriptolutions.com> <mit.lcs.mail.freebsd-arch/20090509200724.GA25714@stack.nl> <200905100500.n4A50GOa050728@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <7710650619.20090510075706@scriptolutions.com> <18950.63671.323324.756287@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <1393224851.20090511112537@scriptolutions.com> <74fe56020905110410y430bf76yacf5c5a308a99865@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Sujit, Monday, May 11, 2009, 1:10:27 PM, you wrote: >> SKM> What ever the Idiots are saying is correct. Read up some decent Unix manual. I read and even better i ported and finally yes i thought about the function, why it is there and why it is better then System V IPC. SKM> What needs to be fixed? Could you be more specific? That the name argument is just that "a name" (in its own name space) not a path. -- Best regards, Lothar Scholz mailto:scholz@scriptolutions.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?981850520.20090511172605>