From owner-freebsd-arch Mon May 28 17:43:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F318037B43E for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 17:43:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@unixfreak.org) Received: from hornet.unixfreak.org (hornet [63.198.170.140]) by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25933E2F; Mon, 28 May 2001 17:43:38 -0700 (PDT) To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: {kbd,vid}control insanity patch In-Reply-To: ; from des@ofug.org on "28 May 2001 11:43:16 +0200" Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 17:43:38 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman Message-Id: <20010529004338.A25933E2F@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > Dima Dorfman writes: > > Why? It's still useful; -h isn't the only option kbdcontrol has. It > > at may still be desirable to be able to set -b or -r on all virtual > > terminals. > > Damn, yet another kbdcontrol bug. This - like every other vty- > specific knob - should be in vidcontrol. Are keymaps vty-specific? If they are, we should just merge kbdcontrol and vidcontrol, perhaps with the excetion of whatever sysinstall needs; that can be made a separate program (we can still call that kbdcontrol; I don't care). Dima Dorfman dima@unixfreak.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message