From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Aug 27 9:26:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peloton.runet.edu (peloton.runet.edu [137.45.96.205]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243C61553A for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 09:26:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@peloton.runet.edu) Received: from localhost (brett@localhost) by peloton.runet.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA05377; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 12:23:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from brett@peloton.runet.edu) Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 12:23:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Brett Taylor To: Andy Farkas Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Andy Farkas wrote: > What is the definitive answer to doing a 'make upgrade' on a > production system running an older 2.2.x - is it ok to do it at the > multiuser level, or must one bring the system to single-user mode, > hence denying services during the duration of this rather long > process?? Don't know what the "definitive answer" is, but I've done 3 make upgrades and all succeeded (all done in multi-user mode) - admittedly there were _not_ a lot of users on the machines in question. Brett ***************************************************** Brett Taylor brett@peloton.runet.edu * Dept of Chem and Physics * Curie 39A (540) 831-6147 * ***************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message