Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 25 Jan 2014 22:33:44 -0500
From:      Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>
To:        Jim Ohlstein <jim@ohlste.in>
Cc:        Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?
Message-ID:  <CAGBxaX=9TvA7D4f5PnWZwGzvVrZBO1HcP1X=C8hpDM2GVDNoJA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52E47EF7.7040402@ohlste.in>
References:  <CAHcXP%2Bf6e-t--XbQPTH1goJp_CL7P=zTj5trZVWd4YZ_EsO9gw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGBxaX=t3e5SXoBDHnzAbx=SWbEFMJHNPQL13FnwNgKWM3gCiA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHcXP%2Bew5qt5hc9Y%2BR_njPkfhUMsDDAqNk9aYSacV4PwBmqjfw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGBxaXnXwo4JxnRdffZfdvfETfhgJNkFM-N23H1SOT0G3-oMwA@mail.gmail.com> <CAE-m3X2dQTTsbrTJg2iPT3qkfq7h9U8oGbRZXGAXH%2BJ2T4MFNw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHcXP%2BdtHPHT%2BFD8RdcqhGANBPf1Gk4N4coEpZY-eAuQE3iZtg@mail.gmail.com> <CAE-m3X2rWk-0k_yH1PK0iN_5YhvSh1UsV0VCrroJq==687X1ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <52E43A80.4030501@rawbw.com> <CAGBxaXnfb2yPZZCaf6mYzASzT13b68A8iPT6eUwUdU9W1ya_Qg@mail.gmail.com> <52E44BC1.7040404@rawbw.com> <CAGBxaXkCWAAfA%2B7x9-icTwO4Vd78EGOeh5-4eG3DUJ_gGVHT1g@mail.gmail.com> <52E46D44.6050403@freebsd.org> <52E47EF7.7040402@ohlste.in>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> I like the KISS approach myself. This can be boiled down to those two
> issues, one of which is a symptom of the other. Arguing and debating over a
> long term solution to the OP's question does nothing to solve the problem
> in the short to intermediate term. There are 1680 current ports related
> PR's at this moment.
>

The reason for the whole tangent was the observation that large number of
the pending PR's are likely to fail one or more *BASIC*  tests and setting
stuff up to run those tests is trivial (like I said I voluneteer to do
it)... the other main thread there was that some of the *IDEAS* of SCM can
borrowed and incorporated into manual procedures (such as requiring a
successful build before a human will look at it) the other one is a more
formalized workflow such as the one that aegis enforces.... if just the
first is done I think half the PR's can be cleared out immediately and if
both then 80% can be cleared out within a few weeks


-- 
Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGBxaX=9TvA7D4f5PnWZwGzvVrZBO1HcP1X=C8hpDM2GVDNoJA>