From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Feb  1 09:28:47 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA00927
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 09:28:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA00922
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 09:28:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA19527; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 09:28:37 -0800 (PST)
To: Michael Reifenberger <root@totum.plaut.de>
cc: FreeBSD-current users <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>,
        Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Subject: Re: Good name for a dump(8) option? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 01 Feb 1997 18:12:34 +0100."
             <Pine.BSF.3.95.970201180852.1050B-100000@totum.plaut.de> 
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 1997 09:28:37 -0800
Message-ID: <19524.854818117@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Wouldn't the -1 cause YetAnotherOption?
> Should't it be a size of 0 instead?

I also suggested 0 in a private email to Joerg. :-)

					Jordan