Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:22:28 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: LLVM port(s) take very long time to package Message-ID: <20170414142228.GA52898@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <2B393FE8-C076-4714-A718-0EDA155A5037@freebsd.org> References: <20170412034308.GA56148@FreeBSD.org> <79A96B5B-8E4C-4E2E-8108-BA4F05CBFA4F@freebsd.org> <20170412093737.GB22201@FreeBSD.org> <2B393FE8-C076-4714-A718-0EDA155A5037@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:06:42PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > On 12. Apr 2017, at 11:37, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > ...
> > Other alternative to PKG_NOCOMPRESS=1 could be PKGSUFFIX=.tbz (pkg-static
> > create -f tbz ...), will play with that as well.
>
> I don't think bzip will buy you much in terms of performance,
Surprisingly, it actually did:
$ time make package PKG_SUFX=.tbz
===> Building package for llvm40-4.0.0_2
565.215u 5.316s 9:34.18 99.3% 7899+502k 1+3020io 0pf+0w
^^^^^^^
Single-threaded bzip2 was faster than multi-threaded xz, at the expense
of larger package of course:
$ ls -s1 llvm40-4.0.0_2.t*
386752 llvm40-4.0.0_2.tbz
286816 llvm40-4.0.0_2.txz
> supporting something like lz4 would be useful.
Or, like vsevolod@ had mentioned, Zstandard. But I'm afraid it would
take some time before we'd arrive there.
./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170414142228.GA52898>