From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Mar 3 10:46:49 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D53F2FD0B; Sat, 3 Mar 2018 10:46:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85A997A8F3; Sat, 3 Mar 2018 10:46:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 7784F7102; Sat, 3 Mar 2018 10:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 10:46:49 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r463346 - in head/benchmarks: . apib Message-ID: <20180303104649.GA92185@FreeBSD.org> References: <201803011737.w21HbpuC094085@repo.freebsd.org> <20180302083721.xz2piujwi3rz6fup@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20180302090309.GA53578@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180302090309.GA53578@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2018 10:46:50 -0000 On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 09:03:09AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 09:37:21AM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 05:37:51PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > +PORTNAME= apib > > > +PORTVERSION= 1.0 > > > +GH_TAGNAME= 7e8dea9 > > > > Calling this 1.0 is a bit strange, > > It would seem so, and usually is, but not in this case. Their latest > (declared) version is 1.0. > > > there is a APIB_1_0 tag, but it is not for this commit. > > Because it's from Nov 8, 2013. > > > So, this is not really 1.0. > > It's only 4 commits behind the master. I've filed an issue upstream about my recent changes to this program and also mentioned that APIB_1_0 tag is too old and perhaps a new version is in order. If all goes well, explicit GH_TAGNAME would go away soon. :-) https://github.com/apigee/apib/issues/15 ./danfe