Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:33:01 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...) Message-ID: <200102131533.KAA30494@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <200102130120.f1D1KpU56194@mobile.wemm.org> References: <xzpd7cno08x.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <200102130120.f1D1KpU56194@mobile.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:20:51 -0800, Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> said: > If we had taken -current to 500, we could go to 501, 502, etc as > required to stop killing our developers, and prior to entering 5.0-BETA we > go back to the next sequentially available major number (be it 5, or 6 > if RELENG_4 bumps again). Shared library version numbers going backwards is *evil*. Not quite as evil as it used to be under a.out, but still evil. Please don't go there. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102131533.KAA30494>