From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 11 03:54:56 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA02890 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 03:54:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (the-menacing-troll.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.238]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA02875; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 03:54:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA01226; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 12:54:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: "Allen Smith" cc: Studded , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, andreas@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is 'xntpd' broken in -stable? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 11 Feb 1999 06:39:31 EST." <9902110639.ZM19743@beatrice.rutgers.edu> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 12:54:35 +0100 Message-ID: <1224.918734075@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >BTW, ntp 4 includes a couple of line disciplines designed for use by >ntpd. Have any of you taken a look at adding these to FreeBSD, >particularly the tty_clk one (the tty_chu one being of much more >limited usage)? No, I'm more interested in the PPS stuff. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message