Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Jul 2013 19:42:46 -0500
From:      Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc:        Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk>
Subject:   Re: is portmaster --check-port-dbdir obsolete?
Message-ID:  <51EC8006.3070909@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <51DAAACA.1050105@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201307081052.r68AqgW9015334@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <51DAAACA.1050105@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
------enig2QANKFGROUGWPFGPDGGVX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 7/8/2013 7:04 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 7/8/2013 5:52 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> With ports tree at r322480, I updated
>> several ports with portmaster.
>>
>> "pkg check -srda" did not find any problems, but
>>
>>
>> # portmaster --check-port-dbdir
>> =3D=3D=3D>>> Building list of installed port names
>>
>> =3D=3D=3D>>> Checking /var/db/ports
>>         =3D=3D=3D>>> devel_apr1 does not seem to be installed
>>
>>         =3D=3D=3D>>> Delete /var/db/ports/devel_apr1? y/n [n]=20
>>
>>
>>         =3D=3D=3D>>> math_gmp does not seem to be installed
>>
>>         =3D=3D=3D>>> Delete /var/db/ports/math_gmp? y/n [n]=20
>>
>>
>>         =3D=3D=3D>>> www_serf does not seem to be installed
>>
>>         =3D=3D=3D>>> Delete /var/db/ports/www_serf? y/n [n]=20
>>
>>
>> #=20
>>
>> So is "portmaster --check-port-dbdir" an obsolete check?
>> If so, will this option be removed in future versions?
>>
>> Anton
>=20
> It's not obsolete. I just need to update it to recognize the new format=
=2E
>=20
> https://github.com/freebsd/portmaster/issues/25
>=20
>=20

This is now fixed in 3.17.1. Just committed to ports.

--=20
Regards,
Bryan Drewery


------enig2QANKFGROUGWPFGPDGGVX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR7IAGAAoJEG54KsA8mwz5lWEP/35ces/KQzEkbswIr8iR+ESl
Xe3JCQ7nTesvq0ubSPRCJ+SMRsiUhaXckcGGxN2gLNzGc+aFvJAXzAGGd1dDSnDA
NMM4WTZaftuJMZkyYc44Ieb/duEQpasDwxCg9j+08Tca+vhi0ClwoGD+qoTkAKOc
jiiEN0mIEfMnoIhzet863NpiP11z+YljWUt1lgGZMqCHLpELjPGmLXlGEg5xI0WQ
znCmLOwhNDVV8JkgICqcjh/hVqnseJwxRud64cmGIUrJvDpZt8KuVQNUlpnAUQa0
19GfM0jD3frPVOiBPcPEBiytgM7B8SLh4hPJSnEMJZnexhJwr/IvRGl/Mx1XDcs7
Qo/vBpB+P3LtuXZY4Bhrx9R1gKq3UvyG8CAo5RsYbp4qLFjGziWIK4yrzdpFBYeX
RWeZKkJ+/YF4q/dZUWQ2CmJJL3y5N8lp1yCVhv/1MZRSossXCtcU//nw3SME6vN6
oxawzn1UG4auHHu7R9QxM8QDiNZpoOEBmvq9844C+bAHB7ueSacEsFODnboMFcRg
zv/9jD88DBt1J/Qysyd09wGD3TPIoT2Bj1mv1QR89K2jnXDEtisSexSM50J9C7wd
ueV3xglBfU9jXBlG3pcgWEnVj0V/V9JBhmTdOBsiwhCzjAMAZ8KC5Etuq0tSyNsK
zBWu/f4+S9dRd5+oyTT/
=kn7u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------enig2QANKFGROUGWPFGPDGGVX--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51EC8006.3070909>