From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Dec 13 09:41:19 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA07683 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 13 Dec 1995 09:41:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rd.zgik.zaporizhzhe.ua (rd.zgik.zaporizhzhe.ua [193.124.62.69]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA07657 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 1995 09:40:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by rd.zgik.zaporizhzhe.ua id AA03545 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4 for hackers@FreeBSD.ORG); Wed, 13 Dec 1995 19:38:14 +0200 From: Yury Pshenychny Message-Id: <199512131738.AA03545@rd.zgik.zaporizhzhe.ua> Subject: Re: bug or feature in kern/tty.c To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 19:38:11 +0200 (UKR) Cc: eugen@rd.zgik.zaporizhzhe.ua, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, yura@rd.zgik.zaporizhzhe.ua In-Reply-To: <199512131410.BAA23057@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Dec 14, 95 01:10:41 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL0] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Bruce Evans wrote: > [skip] >According to the man page, slattach aborts if it receives a SIGHUP in the Im 3 times reread manuals on slattach, but not found this words. >!redial_command case. This got broken when complications to get rid of >the controlling terminal were introduced. Oh why, my God, why work on 'toward POSIX compliance' of FreeBSD broke old good slattach? > >Bruce > -- Юрий Пшеничный yura@zgik.zaporizhzhe.ua