From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 16 07:35:38 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBED1106566B
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725168FC0A
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:35:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F13B1FFC58;
	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:35:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 268F9844B0; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:35:37 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
References: <1299682310.17149.24.camel@w500.local>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1103100147350.1891@qvfongpu.qngnvk.ybpny>
	<1299769253.20266.23.camel@w500.local>
	<2E5C0CE8-4F70-4A4D-A91D-3274FD394C80@elvandar.org>
	<1299784361.18199.4.camel@w500.local>
	<20110310202653.GG9421@shame.svkt.org>
	<1299798547.20831.59.camel@w500.local>
	<20110313204054.GA5392@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
	<1300050377.5900.12.camel@w500.local>
	<20110313220552.5b79de13@gumby.homeunix.com>
	<86ipvky8md.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<20110315132258.01b8e976@gumby.homeunix.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:35:37 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20110315132258.01b8e976@gumby.homeunix.com> (RW's message of
	"Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:22:58 +0000")
Message-ID: <8662rjy0ty.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: It's not possible to allow non-OPIE logins only from trusted
	networks
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:35:38 -0000

RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> writes:
> Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> > RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> writes:
> > > IIRC there is/was a weakness in FreeBSD's OPIE implementation in
> > > that it's susceptible to rainbow table attacks - I think part of
> > > the hash is discarded.
> > Can you provide more details?
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2009-February/005114.=
html

Heh :)

My first comment was a reference to the quality of the code, not the
design.  My second comment is basically the same thing I just said - we
cannot change this without breaking compatibility.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no