Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 22:15:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@hwcn.org> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/xzip Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980701221003.19131A-100000@james.hwcn.org> In-Reply-To: <199807020039.RAA15282@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 1 Jul 1998, Satoshi Asami wrote: > Modified files: > games/xzip Makefile > Log: > Take out "x11" from category. Hmm... Looking over the commit logs, I see you've been doing this for a while. There are still an awful lot of ports that have x11 as a secondary category, however, and it's rather useful for identifying which ones use x11... What's the current policy on x11 as a secondary category? Further, are you planning to commit your patch to add fake X dependencies in the next round of "commits to bsd.port.mk"? If so, how should that be used? (Ie. what defines a dependency on X? Do tcl/Tk ports count?) FWIW, I rather liked the "x11 as a secondary category for all ports depending on X, except for Tk?? ports which have that as secondary category instead". -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.96.980701221003.19131A-100000>