Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:18:11 +0100
From:      Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org, marius@alchemy.franken.de
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r200797 - head/lib/libc/stdtime
Message-ID:  <20091222141810.GA17221@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20091221.211648.632868945383134253.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <200912211943.nBLJhNUU038425@svn.freebsd.org> <200912211459.21766.jhb@freebsd.org> <20091221220004.GA42400@alchemy.franken.de> <20091221.211648.632868945383134253.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:16:48PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20091221220004.GA42400@alchemy.franken.de>
>             Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> writes:
> : On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:59:21PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> : > On Monday 21 December 2009 2:43:23 pm John Baldwin wrote:
> : > > Author: jhb
> : > > Date: Mon Dec 21 19:43:23 2009
> : > > New Revision: 200797
> : > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/200797
> : > > 
> : > > Log:
> : > >   Use _once() to initialize the pthread key for thread-local storage to hold
> : > >   the results of localtime() instead of using a pthread mutex directly.
> : > 
> : > It would probably be simpler to use TLS for this instead, but I'm not sure if
> : > we have working TLS on all supported platforms.
> : > 
> : 
> : At least not on arm and sparc64 as the in-tree binutils predate
> : GNU TLS support for these.
> 
> We really need newer binutils in the tree.
> 
> And we need a way to compiler gplv3 binutils into the system for folks
> that can do that without consequences...  But many modern processors
> need to have the gplv3 version of binutils and that will be a
> continuing problem.  One advantage of FreeBSD is its integration,
> rather than having to play version whack-a-mole like you do with
> embedded Linux.

well... llvm provides its own assembler so if the need for newer binutils
comes from need of newer as I believe llvm can help here. or is the linker
the problem?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091222141810.GA17221>