Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 10:04:24 -0500 From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: Steven Wallace <swallace@ece.uci.edu> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: We need to do another XFree86 release for -current someday soon.. Message-ID: <9603291504.AA10038@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <199603290211.SAA06536@newport.ece.uci.edu> References: <26399.828045200@time.cdrom.com> <199603290211.SAA06536@newport.ece.uci.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Thu, 28 Mar 1996 18:11:13 -0800, Steven Wallace <swallace@ece.uci.edu> said: > Yeah, that's one reason why I hate bumping the major version. > Why do ns_addr() and iso_addr() have to go? What's the big deal? Because the network address families they supported are no longer shipped, and thus they won't compile any more. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9603291504.AA10038>