Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 03:30:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Yar Tikhiy <yar@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/56325: Incorrect information in /etc/gettytab Message-ID: <200309091030.h89AUKNo090708@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR bin/56325; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Yar Tikhiy <yar@freebsd.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: mats@snowbee.dyns.cx, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/56325: Incorrect information in /etc/gettytab Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:27:48 +0400 On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:14:29AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > > I believe that people use just np nowadays, so the question is > > whether the old behaviour of parity flag combinations is worth > > restoring. How do you think? > > Not having it is OK with me. I used just np back when I wrote those > lines in gettytab :-). As long as nobody has actually needed the old functionality in the last 9 years, I'll just match the comment at the top of gettytab with the harsh reality of the XXI century :-) -- Yar
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200309091030.h89AUKNo090708>