Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 13:14:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Eric Le Goff <elegoff@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnat gpl 2009 Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906011313340.30497@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <d848d7b70906010247n71a05023t5c45dc06049818a1@mail.gmail.com> References: <d848d7b70906010247n71a05023t5c45dc06049818a1@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Will the port lang/gnat reflect this update ? > > Should I stick to gnat gpl 2006 which is the latest I found in my ports tree ? > or go for any of the lang/gnat-gcc* ports ? the best solution is to write a port for v2009 (use v2006 port as base), use what is better for you, and do sent-pr to port maintainers so that port will be included :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0906011313340.30497>