Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 08:42:20 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Marko Schuetz <marko@ki.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de> Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Difference between a 3C589C and a 3C589D Message-ID: <199707251442.IAA24429@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199707251015.DAA25890@hub.freebsd.org> References: <199707241739.KAA12552@myrtle.bogs.org> <199707250544.PAA20271@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> <199707251015.DAA25890@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 100) and it works fine. In what respect are the 3c589s considered to > be 'best'? For a long time, they were one of the few 'supported' cards. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707251442.IAA24429>