From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 14 12:06:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172BE1065693 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:06:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from constantine.ticketswitch.com (constantine.ticketswitch.com [IPv6:2002:57e0:1d4e:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312FA8FC14 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from dilbert.rattatosk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by constantine.ticketswitch.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1MFoTK-000D0c-Ba; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:06:02 +0100 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1MFoTK-0006tT-Aa; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:06:02 +0100 To: aragon@phat.za.net, tj@tjvarghese.com In-Reply-To: <4A34DA2D.1070104@tjvarghese.com> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:06:02 +0100 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reecommendations for an 'appliance" platform ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:06:05 -0000 > I've tried the Atom330 (D945GCLF2). It works fine with amd64...however > it's rather wasted for 64bit considering it maxes out at 2gb. But I > suppose if you wanted to standardize on amd64 installs, this is good. Size of memory doesnt bother me really - I made the move to amd64 because of the extra performance due to the extra registers (about 8% on my application, I realise that not everyone gets a speedup). Given the fact I am also moving to ZFS, and that works a lot better on amd64, then I am not keen to go back ;-) > Gigabit - ok, re0. You'll need 7.2 at least. > USB - ok > SATA - 2 ports tested only with gmirror, ok. Those three are very good to know work - the box will be headless, so I just need ether and booting to work fine. Am always wary of re0 ethernets as have been bitten in the past. Thanks for all the advice from eeryone in this thread - I have narrowed the choice down to either the Tranquil PC unit, or the Shuttle X27D, which is also Atom 330 based. Given the price I may simply buy one of each and evaluate which is better. Will report back if so. cheers, -pete.