From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jun 12  4:10: 8 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from tao.org.uk (genesis.tao.org.uk [212.135.162.62])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D411F37B403
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 04:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from joe@tao.org.uk)
Received: by tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100)
	id 9276355F; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:09:58 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:09:58 +0100
From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk>
To: Eric Parusel <lists@globalrelay.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: The FreeBSD core team needs your help
Message-ID: <20010612120958.G10614@tao.org.uk>
Mail-Followup-To: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk>,
	Eric Parusel <lists@globalrelay.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <20010608134705.19635.qmail@web14701.mail.yahoo.com> <004001c0f030$36a0d3e0$0600020a@frontend>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NY6JkbSqL3W9mApi"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <004001c0f030$36a0d3e0$0600020a@frontend>; from lists@globalrelay.net on Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:32:23AM -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-stable.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-stable>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-stable>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--NY6JkbSqL3W9mApi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:32:23AM -0700, Eric Parusel wrote:
> > > A journalling FS for those people who just hate waiting for a
> couple
> > > of
> > > TB of slow disks to fsck?
> >
> > Does ReiserFS work with FreeBSD?
>=20
> >From what I've read, XFS is quite good as well....  (Whether or not it
> could ever work with *BSD, I don't know)

Apparently XFS would run better on FreeBSD than on Linux, from what
Adrian told me.  This is because linux apparently channels all I/O
through 512k buffers whereas XFS uses larger buffers to get it's speed.
FreeBSD's buffer cache doesn't have the same limitations that Linux's
does.

Joe

--NY6JkbSqL3W9mApi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjsl+IUACgkQXVIcjOaxUBZbWACgmFzsQg4JELUtWuqvWY0uqvUM
Uc8AoOqJn3/eNTOwbCbOww6YB7YmWQJb
=cug6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NY6JkbSqL3W9mApi--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message