From owner-cvs-doc Fri Sep 26 22:07:23 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA25952 for cvs-doc-outgoing; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 22:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from veda.is (adam@veda.is [193.4.230.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA25942; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 22:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from adam@localhost) by veda.is (8.8.7/8.8.5) id FAA13523; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 05:06:57 GMT From: Adam David Message-Id: <199709270506.FAA13523@veda.is> Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/handbook submitters.sgml In-Reply-To: from Tim Vanderhoek at "Sep 26, 97 07:05:26 pm" To: ac199@hwcn.org Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 05:06:57 +0000 (GMT) Cc: hoek@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > On Fri, 26 Sep 1997, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > > > Modified files: > > handbook submitters.sgml > > Log: > > > > Also, be consistent about putting for unknown email addresses. > > Actually, I think the few names without email addresses would look > considerably nicer if they had no email address listed than if they > had "" listed. Would anyone be upset if I changed this? I agree it looks better to omit unknown email addresses altogether. Besides, tends to suggest that '?' is a valid email address, which is obviously bogus. IMHO, of course. -- Adam David