From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Mar 28 1:48:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from smyk.apk.net (smyk.apk.net [207.54.158.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBDB337B41A for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 01:48:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from carbon.apk.net (stuart.apk.net [207.54.148.235]) by smyk.apk.net (8.11.2/8.11.2/apk.010219+rchk1.22+bspm1.13.1.5a) with SMTP id g2S9mP520360 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 04:48:25 -0500 (EST) From: Stuart Krivis To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: qmail (Was: Maintaining Access Control Lists ) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 04:48:32 -0500 Organization: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems, Inc. Reply-To: ipswitch@apk.net Message-ID: References: <000c01c1d3ab$6d2c6960$6600a8c0@penguin> <20020325015236.A97552@futuresouth.com> <3C9EFED0.DB176CB8@mindspring.com> <20020325115207.GA22032@sleepy.wojomedia.com> In-Reply-To: <20020325115207.GA22032@sleepy.wojomedia.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.9/32.560 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 05:52:07 -0600, Tim wrote: > >Brad could very much be right in the end. He just couldn't get >past his DJB hatre to provide any real merits in his argument (like >judging software base on ease of configuration and the size of the >configuration file - what was that all about?). I am not surprised, It sounded valid to me. I actually prefer software that is easy to configure and doesn't need 30 million statements in 19 different config files scattered all over. (And I'm not inferring that qmail is hard to configure or that it needs wildly complex config files.) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message