From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Dec 9 23:58:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from slacknet.slacknet.com (slacknet.slacknet.com [204.228.135.180]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463D737B417 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 23:58:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from rj45 (helo=localhost) by slacknet.slacknet.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16DLKY-0008R0-00 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:58:30 -0700 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:58:30 -0700 (MST) From: RJ45 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: compiling STABLE with specific cpu options. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, is it a good or BAD thing to compile STABLE using specific 'mcpu' options ?? and the same is good or bad in compiling ports or kernel?? I used mcpu=ev56 for my alpha CPU And I noticed I had some strange core dump problem with some programs. Is it better not to include spefific mcpu options in make.conf expefially building STABLE ?? thanks Rick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message