Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 20:23:51 +0200 From: Juris Kaminskis <juris.kaminskis@gmail.com> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [Bug 162859] [acpi] ACPI battery/acline monitoring partialy working (switching) Message-ID: <CAKJAkzvHswrDO1YtSOxO0qfXJJWsVfu_vOsB_G2LPYJmp_nuqw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAKJAkzuZQJm3T1v3FPXJxrRBZBROamMogDmTBBPGKMs6sr%2B2Gw@mail.gmail.com> References: <bug-162859-13733@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <bug-162859-13733-wjrXNSa1SW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <20150104234107.Q82172@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <CAKJAkzuZQJm3T1v3FPXJxrRBZBROamMogDmTBBPGKMs6sr%2B2Gw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2015-01-05 17:27 GMT+02:00 Juris Kaminskis <juris.kaminskis@gmail.com>: > > 2015-01-04 15:17 GMT+02:00 Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>: > > > > On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:45:05 +0000, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: > > > > Please excuse this off-'zilla merely speculative response. No time, but > > I've spent (wasted?) some time chasing a couple of these outside the PR. > > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162859 > > > > > > --- Comment #14 from juris <juris.kaminskis@gmail.com> --- > > > Problem on /head/ branch is introduced with revision 216942. > > > > If true (in all cases) this is great news for those with a variety of HP > > laptops that have been experiencing partial - or in some cases complete > > after boot - failures in CMBAT monitoring since 9.0. And a Macbook Pro. > > > > So, reverting rev 216942 fixes it for you? On what FreeBSD version? > > I have compiled head branch revision 216941 and battery status via > acpiconf works. When compiling from source revision 216942 acpiconf stops > responding. I also tried to remove r216942 and compiled from source release > 9.3, but there battery status was not working. Apparently there are more > things than just one that breaks HP ACPI . > Sorry for my previous email that was confusing. I did not revert r216941 when compiled release 9.3. So when I did that, battery status works. I also compiled release 10.1 with excluding r216942, and battery status works. So this single change for some reason creates problem for HP laptops. > > > > > > If so, with scant comprehension of the code, questions that occur: > > > > a) did that revision fix some existing problem, the reverting of which > > might reestablish problem/s in other machines? jkim? > > > > b) what is it in various HP ACPI implementations that don't seem to be a > > reported problem on other hardware, particularly concerning EC handling? > > > > c) if this was wrong (for HPs), what would be right? (the hard one :) > > > > cheers, Ian > > On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:45:05 +0000, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: > > Please excuse this off-'zilla merely speculative response. No time, but > I've spent (wasted?) some time chasing a couple of these outside the PR. > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162859 > > > > --- Comment #14 from juris <juris.kaminskis@gmail.com> --- > > Problem on /head/ branch is introduced with revision 216942. > > If true (in all cases) this is great news for those with a variety of HP > laptops that have been experiencing partial - or in some cases complete > after boot - failures in CMBAT monitoring since 9.0. And a Macbook Pro. > > So, reverting rev 216942 fixes it for you? On what FreeBSD version? > > If so, with scant comprehension of the code, questions that occur: > > a) did that revision fix some existing problem, the reverting of which > might reestablish problem/s in other machines? jkim? > > b) what is it in various HP ACPI implementations that don't seem to be a > reported problem on other hardware, particularly concerning EC handling? > > c) if this was wrong (for HPs), what would be right? (the hard one :) > > cheers, Ian >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKJAkzvHswrDO1YtSOxO0qfXJJWsVfu_vOsB_G2LPYJmp_nuqw>