From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 00:07:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB6716A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:07:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD92F43D1D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:07:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050403000742.KHP4618.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:07:42 -0500 From: To: Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:07:42 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <040120052012.2977.424DAB1A0004FD7700000BA12205889116CFCFCECC0D9CCD9C0E@comcast.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: RE: ipmon logging X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:07:45 -0000 After testing with 5.3 on my workbench box it seems that ipfilter has changed between 4.11 and 5.3. The syslog.conf logging statement of local0.* /var/log/security is only valid for the ipfilter in the 4.x versions of Freebsd. security.* /var/log/security is only valid for the ipfilter in the 5.3 version and greater of Freebsd. The official handbook is written for 4.11 release. It needs to be updated for the 5.3 5.4 releases -----Original Message----- From: as2sb3100@comcast.net [mailto:as2sb3100@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 3:12 PM To: bob@a1poweruser.com Subject: RE: ipmon logging from the FAQ: 1. # I have IPMon logging to syslog, but syslog doesn't log anything, why not? IPF logs as local0 so you'll want something to the effect of: local0.debug /var/log/ipf.log in your syslog.conf. NOTE: There has to be atleast one TAB in that line, not just spaces. It doesnt do this though, I think, I could mistaken. In my rc.conf file I have ipmon_flags="Ds" and the line in syslog.conf from above (I've also tried local0.* /var/log/ipf.log in syslog.conf) which should do what it says above. All this is documented in the Handbook. However, ipmon uses the security facility instead of local0. This means that whenever something is logged by ipmon, it gets loged to /var/log/security. If I change ipmon_flags="Ds" to ipmon_flags="D /var/log/ipf.log" it works perectly. However, when newsyslog rotates the file when it gets to 100k, ipmon stops logging. When I run nmap I normaly get a bunch of stuff logged. When newsyslog rotates the file it adds logfile turned over due to..., and then nothing gets logged after that. So I know that it stops logging after newsyslog rotates the log. I've been reading through the newsyslog.conf man page, but I'm not sure what I'm looking for. > There is a new write up of IPF in the official manual that explains > in detail how to get ipmon to log to separate file. > > You have to give more technical details about what you have done. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of > as2sb3100@comcast.net > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 1:50 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: ipmon logging > > According to every website I've read so far ipmon uses local0 as the > facility name. However, on my FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5 box, it logs > to the security facility. The man page (in both 5.2.1 and 5.3) for > ipmon, with -s for logging to syslog says, "The default facility > when compiled and installed is security". Can anyone explain this? > I'd like ipmon to log to a separate file so it doesn't fill up the > security log. I've tried having ipmon log directly to a file, and > not using syslog, but it stops logging when newsyslog rotates the > file. Does anyone have any suggestions on what I could or should > do? > > Eric > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 00:24:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94E516A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:24:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C51643D48 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:24:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from randyprimeaux@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so920271rng for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 16:24:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=OKvk/qEWQCkldwi0z/PdfIri28S1p2iTGRfkD/bYQ3mBIBG4if6TnXa5c7jHpYVr1EzL1YdIsONYpeUnKUqaZU7agQGIO8fh9iQzAuLssIoFmgYC4CgJ5mM+8Tgpxar4HgOENNQDq7szVIdRkm28xhJ+vuqG5hJzp4kV6Al1nrg= Received: by 10.38.151.1 with SMTP id y1mr4071265rnd; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 16:24:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.98.33 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 16:24:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54b47b8a05040216247ea6fbca@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 16:24:15 -0800 From: Randy Primeaux To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050402091023.GA90617@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <54b47b8a050401201239941399@mail.gmail.com> <20050402091023.GA90617@slackbox.xs4all.nl> cc: Roland Smith Subject: Re: file mode on dynamicly created cua/tty devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Randy Primeaux List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:24:17 -0000 Roland, thanks. Kris, I'd read "man devfs", but couldn't wrap my head around it in the time available. The comments in this email are for the benefit of future readers. I solved my issue my implementing a ruleset as Roland had suggested in his webpage, and applied the ruleset. And yes, the man page helped me through this process. ***** /etc/devfs.rules [chuck_usb=10] add path 'da*' mode 0660 group usb add path 'cua*' mode 0666 ***** /etc/rc.conf # Set the default devfs ruleset. devfs_system_ruleset="chuck_usb" ***** This is a sample of what I did at the commandline. # /sbin/devfs rule -s 10 add path 'cua*' mode 0666 # /sbin/devfs ruleset 10 apply # ls -laF /dev/cua* crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 12, 152 Apr 2 14:00 /dev/cuaU0 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 12, 155 Apr 1 00:38 /dev/cuaU0.init crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 12, 154 Apr 1 00:38 /dev/cuaU0.lock crw------- 1 root wheel 12, 70 Apr 1 00:38 /dev/cuad0 crw------- 1 root wheel 12, 65 Apr 1 00:38 /dev/cuad0.init crw------- 1 root wheel 12, 64 Apr 1 00:38 /dev/cuad0.lock I wasn't able to correctly "add path" directly. #devfs add path 'cua*' mode 0666 devfs: unknown command: add # devfs rule add path 'cua*' mode 0666 devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_RADD: Input/output error Now I can hotsync and backup my Palm with Kpilot. Yay! On Apr 2, 2005 1:10 AM, Roland Smith wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:12:05PM -0800, Randy Primeaux wrote: > > How do I set file mode to 0666 on dynamicly created devices, such as > > cua* and tty* ? > > With devfs(8). To set the permissions from the command line, use > > devfs add path 'cua*' mode 0666 > > This setting is lost at reboot, unless you put it in > /etc/devfs.rules. See my freebsd page at > http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/freebsd/ for a more thorough explenation. > > Roland > -- > R.F. Smith /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign > r s m i t h @ x s 4 a l l . n l \ / No HTML/RTF in e-mail > http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ X No Word docs in e-mail > public key: http://www.keyserver.net / \ Respect for open standards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 00:46:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DCF16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:46:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B8D43D4C for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:46:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A136D60D4; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 18:46:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10443-02; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 18:46:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA3560E7; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 18:46:45 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <424F3CF4.4030100@makeworld.com> Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 18:46:44 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050327) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gert Cuykens References: <200504022208.33711.danny@ricin.com> <424EFF81.6020205@makeworld.com> <200504022227.20439.danny@ricin.com> <424F00EE.20009@makeworld.com> <424F16AA.6030909@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Danny Pansters Subject: Re: can i delete /stand ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:46:49 -0000 Gert Cuykens wrote: > FX-53R rm -r /stand > FX-53R ls > bin cdrom dev entropy lib mnt rescue sys usr > boot compat dist etc libexec proc sbin tmp var > FX-53R > > Doesnt this look much better :) > > Next what do i have to do to remove /compat /sys and /rescue ? > > Dont forget rm -r /boot -- Best regards, Chris An optimist is a person who looks forward to marriage. A pessimist is a married optimist! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 01:00:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B51916A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:00:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E2A43D1D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:00:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from as2sb3100@comcast.net) Received: from 204.127.197.111 (unknown[204.127.197.130](misconfigured sender)) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <2005040301001901400e2380e>; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:00:19 +0000 Received: from [67.160.176.243] by 204.127.197.111; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:00:21 +0000 From: as2sb3100@comcast.net To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:00:21 +0000 Message-Id: <040320050100.28578.424F40250003106600006FA22206999735CFCFCECC0D9CCD9C0E@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Dec 17 2004) X-Authenticated-Sender: YXMyc2IzMTAwQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0 Subject: RE: ipmon logging X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:00:20 -0000 I figured it was something like that. I read the man page for newsyslog and well not knowing very much about proccesses and stuff, I just skipped over the pid part. After doing some reading I figured out I had to put in the path to the pid. Now when newsyslog rotates the log file it restarts (or relaods or something) ipmon. RTFM realy helps. > After testing with 5.3 on my workbench box it seems that ipfilter > has changed between 4.11 and 5.3. The syslog.conf logging statement > of local0.* /var/log/security is only valid for the > ipfilter in the 4.x versions of Freebsd. > security.* /var/log/security is only valid for the > ipfilter in the 5.3 version and greater of Freebsd. > > > The official handbook is written for 4.11 release. It needs to be > updated for the 5.3 5.4 releases > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: as2sb3100@comcast.net [mailto:as2sb3100@comcast.net] > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 3:12 PM > To: bob@a1poweruser.com > Subject: RE: ipmon logging > > from the FAQ: > 1. # I have IPMon logging to syslog, but syslog doesn't log > anything, why not? > > IPF logs as local0 so you'll want something to the effect of: > local0.debug /var/log/ipf.log > in your syslog.conf. NOTE: There has to be atleast one TAB in > that line, not just spaces. > > It doesnt do this though, I think, I could mistaken. In my rc.conf > file I have ipmon_flags="Ds" and the line in syslog.conf from above > (I've also tried local0.* /var/log/ipf.log in syslog.conf) which > should do what it says above. All this is documented in the > Handbook. However, ipmon uses the security facility instead of > local0. This means that whenever something is logged by ipmon, it > gets loged to /var/log/security. If I change ipmon_flags="Ds" to > ipmon_flags="D /var/log/ipf.log" it works perectly. However, when > newsyslog rotates the file when it gets to 100k, ipmon stops > logging. When I run nmap I normaly get a bunch of stuff logged. > When newsyslog rotates the file it adds logfile turned over due > to..., and then nothing gets logged after that. So I know that it > stops logging after newsyslog rotates the log. I've been reading > through the newsyslog.conf man page, but I'm not sure what I'm > looking for. > > > > There is a new write up of IPF in the official manual that > explains > > in detail how to get ipmon to log to separate file. > > > > You have to give more technical details about what you have done. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of > > as2sb3100@comcast.net > > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 1:50 PM > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: ipmon logging > > > > According to every website I've read so far ipmon uses local0 as > the > > facility name. However, on my FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5 box, it logs > > to the security facility. The man page (in both 5.2.1 and 5.3) > for > > ipmon, with -s for logging to syslog says, "The default facility > > when compiled and installed is security". Can anyone explain > this? > > I'd like ipmon to log to a separate file so it doesn't fill up the > > security log. I've tried having ipmon log directly to a file, and > > not using syslog, but it stops logging when newsyslog rotates the > > file. Does anyone have any suggestions on what I could or should > > do? > > > > Eric > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 01:02:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F288B16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:02:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC4B43D1D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:02:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so922947rng for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:02:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=I0wLxZuZloFcbh04OZc6fvz97IHLuG1uTg2U8p7pIcNoJL2LnELI76zZg/tK+ZNiVjPVlSnwKm4yAeieq3d36Z6A9pJrKpFDy7J/i4S/Rpl3X4TAPXJ0cgtFzYdq5EqUTOQjSTbptHCEoQVMsNL18dVXUs+BU5MkeoPJrWw7f24= Received: by 10.39.1.30 with SMTP id d30mr3151029rni; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:02:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:02:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:02:56 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: racerx@makeworld.com In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200504022208.33711.danny@ricin.com> <424EFF81.6020205@makeworld.com> <200504022227.20439.danny@ricin.com> <424F00EE.20009@makeworld.com> <424F16AA.6030909@locolomo.org> <424F3CF4.4030100@makeworld.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Danny Pansters Subject: Re: can i delete /stand ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:02:58 -0000 On Apr 3, 2005 2:52 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Apr 3, 2005 2:46 AM, Chris wrote: > > Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > FX-53R rm -r /stand > > > FX-53R ls > > > bin cdrom dev entropy lib mnt rescue sys usr > > > boot compat dist etc libexec proc sbin tmp var > > > FX-53R > > > > > > Doesnt this look much better :) > > > > > > Next what do i have to do to remove /compat /sys and /rescue ? > > > > > > > > > > Dont forget rm -r /boot > > > > but i like /boot :) maybe i can rename it later to /freebsd but first > i want to get rit of /cdrom /compat /sys /rescue > i changed the fstab for the cdrom to /mnt and the compat and dist was empty so now my / looks like FX-53R ls bin dev etc libexec proc sbin tmp var boot entropy lib mnt rescue sys usr FX-53R i need some advice on the /rescue and /sys doh ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 01:04:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4911416A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:04:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35BA43D45 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:04:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 55A7C51E1C; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:04:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:04:20 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: bob@a1poweruser.com Message-ID: <20050403010420.GA18715@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050402213208.GA69888@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 5.3 auto starting NFS by error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:04:22 -0000 --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 05:31:41PM -0500, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > My rc.conf only contains the default serial mouse statements and the > usbd_enable statement. >=20 > I also get this msg in the boot log "Mounting NFS file systems" >=20 > The only way to stop the 4 nfsoid tasks is issue a kill command on > their task number every time you boot the system or recompile the > kernel and remove the nfs statements in the kernel source. >=20 > Answering no to the 2 questions in stand/sysinstall about nfs client > and server should have prevented those nfs tasks from starting at > boot time like in the 4.x releases. NFS support will be dynamically loaded if you specify NFS mounts in your /etc/fstab. Is this the case? Kris P.S. Please don't top-post. --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCT0ETWry0BWjoQKURAhPGAKDvN2digyWdXIDbibyav4HFS45b5QCfY9Kx DO/RbwdhZjQ3UsyZNR7XsWg= =Xyof -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 01:09:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EE316A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:09:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C0843D3F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:09:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so923418rng for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:09:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=gJjjWzbVh/m3OLFkt9AcVgjS+GgB+4KiQiGCTSVR5FsNTdLmFKESSj9Xw3qJaFEgIHltY7p7X2NK/BFkOlA293U1gLLPQiqxLO1FQlCMaJLWnTy4QfT+F/lJLyLUmaYCHD3usOAHVjRi6XgNAxuamUNPqbB/8dGOQRcbF3rs32M= Received: by 10.38.12.33 with SMTP id 33mr4028745rnl; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:09:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:09:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:09:39 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: racerx@makeworld.com In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200504022208.33711.danny@ricin.com> <424EFF81.6020205@makeworld.com> <200504022227.20439.danny@ricin.com> <424F00EE.20009@makeworld.com> <424F16AA.6030909@locolomo.org> <424F3CF4.4030100@makeworld.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Danny Pansters Subject: Re: can i delete /stand ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:09:40 -0000 On Apr 3, 2005 3:02 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Apr 3, 2005 2:52 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2005 2:46 AM, Chris wrote: > > > Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > > FX-53R rm -r /stand > > > > FX-53R ls > > > > bin cdrom dev entropy lib mnt rescue sys usr > > > > boot compat dist etc libexec proc sbin tmp var > > > > FX-53R > > > > > > > > Doesnt this look much better :) > > > > > > > > Next what do i have to do to remove /compat /sys and /rescue ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dont forget rm -r /boot > > > > > > > but i like /boot :) maybe i can rename it later to /freebsd but first > > i want to get rit of /cdrom /compat /sys /rescue > > > > i changed the fstab for the cdrom to /mnt and the compat and dist was > empty so now my / looks like > > FX-53R ls > bin dev etc libexec proc sbin tmp var > boot entropy lib mnt rescue sys usr > FX-53R > > i need some advice on the /rescue and /sys doh ? > i also noticed /proc is empty but i read in the manual /proc Process file system; see procfs(5), mount_procfs(8). "better ask Eric" i was thinking before removing From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 01:16:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E6916A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:16:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E283A43D48 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:16:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so923864rng for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:16:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=gLrjZyOeYpXGQFkfy6/SIMXJnWTPXcNQhKJx2ojeLNr/mnmdofYrjg7ulF0o+ZJXhn6p6c/quh3wRwPNiu7YPMgHb9tFkOfhT3ZUsSHLba3TwVXHkvLzFDE7bVlK2PNyuaXnFxRqwwqfLyrrH2x5S/K45JOoJ2OVOlUmQcI/03A= Received: by 10.38.160.52 with SMTP id i52mr4010899rne; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:16:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:16:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:16:58 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: racerx@makeworld.com In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <424EFF81.6020205@makeworld.com> <200504022227.20439.danny@ricin.com> <424F00EE.20009@makeworld.com> <424F16AA.6030909@locolomo.org> <424F3CF4.4030100@makeworld.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Danny Pansters Subject: Re: can i delete /stand ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:16:59 -0000 On Apr 3, 2005 3:09 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Apr 3, 2005 3:02 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2005 2:52 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > On Apr 3, 2005 2:46 AM, Chris wrote: > > > > Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > > > FX-53R rm -r /stand > > > > > FX-53R ls > > > > > bin cdrom dev entropy lib mnt rescue sys usr > > > > > boot compat dist etc libexec proc sbin tmp var > > > > > FX-53R > > > > > > > > > > Doesnt this look much better :) > > > > > > > > > > Next what do i have to do to remove /compat /sys and /rescue ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dont forget rm -r /boot > > > > > > > > > > but i like /boot :) maybe i can rename it later to /freebsd but first > > > i want to get rit of /cdrom /compat /sys /rescue > > > > > > > i changed the fstab for the cdrom to /mnt and the compat and dist was > > empty so now my / looks like > > > > FX-53R ls > > bin dev etc libexec proc sbin tmp var > > boot entropy lib mnt rescue sys usr > > FX-53R > > > > i need some advice on the /rescue and /sys doh ? > > > > i also noticed /proc is empty but i read in the manual > > /proc Process file system; see procfs(5), mount_procfs(8). > > "better ask Eric" i was thinking before removing > The folowing may be a tricky one how to move the /entropy to /boot/entropy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 01:43:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4729316A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:43:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EBB43D2D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:43:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050403014353.CYFU4618.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 20:43:53 -0500 From: To: "Kris Kennaway" Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 20:43:47 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050403010420.GA18715@xor.obsecurity.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: RE: 5.3 auto starting NFS by error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:43:54 -0000 This is a standard vanilla install from mini.iso cd with all the sysinstall questions answered as no. I have not made any changes to any /etc files. What was delivered in the install is what the current content is. The /etc/fstab as delivered does not have any nfs mounts. This is not a configuration error on my part. This is how the 5.3 system gets installed for cd. This is a problem with how the sysinstall process configures the system. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 8:04 PM To: bob@a1poweruser.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG; Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 5.3 auto starting NFS by error On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 05:31:41PM -0500, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > My rc.conf only contains the default serial mouse statements and the > usbd_enable statement. > > I also get this msg in the boot log "Mounting NFS file systems" > > The only way to stop the 4 nfsoid tasks is issue a kill command on > their task number every time you boot the system or recompile the > kernel and remove the nfs statements in the kernel source. > > Answering no to the 2 questions in stand/sysinstall about nfs client > and server should have prevented those nfs tasks from starting at > boot time like in the 4.x releases. NFS support will be dynamically loaded if you specify NFS mounts in your /etc/fstab. Is this the case? Kris P.S. Please don't top-post. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 01:52:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5D616A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:52:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web31514.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31514.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 377CD43D3F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:52:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdagee2@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 80159 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Apr 2005 01:52:22 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=bHgLfjsBX2gbq/1bc5eflk9KAp6oDkCpdt3kErtZIMb5hLif26Nq/sFWnXqYLgW2m4Y2GZzcCSSzXoT6NFS4fozAKZyRGDHOuPjOoJ7t4gzzsvxXBw6uBj3ytlRly6YSFKqIKfGOeKaJ2fYXWtgt9iCE4sQ5bzuGRf7w/bcMYWQ= ; Message-ID: <20050403015222.80157.qmail@web31514.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.186.70.48] by web31514.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:52:22 PST Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:52:22 -0800 (PST) From: Karl Agee To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: su: illegal option -- s X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:52:23 -0000 FreeBSD 4.11-Stable, bash 2.05. I am getting an error when I try to launch a daemon script manually as root, or in /usr/local/etc/rc.d: -su-2.05b# /usr/local/koha/intranet/scripts/z3950daemon/z3950-daemon-launch.sh -su-2.05b# su: illegal option -- s usage: su [-] [-flm] [-c class] [login [args]] the perms on it are: -su-2.05b# ls -la /usr/local/koha/intranet/scripts/z3950daemon/z3950-daemon-launch.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 www www 2750 Mar 29 19:57 /usr/local/koha/intranet/scripts/z3950daemon/z3950-daemon-launch.sh it is related to a web based application. The line in the script that calls this is: su -s /bin/sh -c $KohaZ3950Shell - $RunAsUser & The su man page indicates that the -s option isnt supported....how can I edit this so this function works?? --karl __________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 01:56:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24A916A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:56:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-04-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E2D43D49 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:56:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (cpe-065-184-201-054.ec.res.rr.com [65.184.201.54])j331ulL4005759; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 20:56:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <424F4FAD.7080300@ec.rr.com> Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:06:37 -0500 From: jason henson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050321) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dick hoogendijk References: <20050402173222.53977dd4.dick@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20050402173222.53977dd4.dick@nagual.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: device_polling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:56:59 -0000 dick hoogendijk wrote: >I was building a new kernel today and came across an option I had not >seen before. I googled some and concluded that "options device_polling / >options HZ=1000" would be a better way for my realtec network cards than >the default interupt driven.. > >Is this correct?? Would it be better to have this polling in the kernel? >(fbsd-4.11-stable) > > > I would say yes. Check man polling for extra info. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 02:02:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03EB16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 02:02:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1F643D1D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 02:02:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 57F1151E1C; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 18:02:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 18:02:32 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: bob@a1poweruser.com Message-ID: <20050403020231.GA34554@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050403010420.GA18715@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 5.3 auto starting NFS by error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 02:02:33 -0000 --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 08:43:47PM -0500, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > This is a standard vanilla install from mini.iso cd with all the > sysinstall questions answered as no. > I have not made any changes to any /etc files. > What was delivered in the install is what the current content is. > The /etc/fstab as delivered does not have any nfs mounts. > This is not a configuration error on my part. This is how the 5.3 > system gets installed for cd. > This is a problem with how the sysinstall process configures the > system. The GENERIC (i.e. default) kernel is configured to allow NFS client support, which means that the nfsiod kernel processes are spawned at boot time. If you don't want this, reconfigure your kernel to disable the NFS client support. Or don't, because the resource usage is negligible. Kris P.S. You're still top-posting. If you can't be bothered to format your posts properly, I won't bother to help you. --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCT063Wry0BWjoQKURAnxeAKDIony+JEQnr34cpcWkfZuZeLvEoQCgvLiX JcJc54hgqL1sq6SfF9jTumw= =jzPw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 02:14:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1290116A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 02:14:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7521B43D2D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 02:14:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j332EeSN064676; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 20:14:40 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 20:14:40 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Karl Agee Message-ID: <20050403021439.GG83737@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20050403015222.80157.qmail@web31514.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050403015222.80157.qmail@web31514.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: su: illegal option -- s X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 02:14:44 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 02), Karl Agee said: > FreeBSD 4.11-Stable, bash 2.05. > > I am getting an error when I try to launch a daemon > script manually as root, or in /usr/local/etc/rc.d: > > -su-2.05b# /usr/local/koha/intranet/scripts/z3950daemon/z3950-daemon-launch.sh > -su-2.05b# su: illegal option -- s > usage: su [-] [-flm] [-c class] [login [args]] > > The line in the script that calls this is: > > su -s /bin/sh -c $KohaZ3950Shell - $RunAsUser & > > The su man page indicates that the -s option isnt supported....how > can I edit this so this function works?? That's really weird su syntax there. Try su - $RunasUser -c $KohaZ3950Shell -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 02:15:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5469316A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 02:15:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web31510.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31510.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5AB343D39 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 02:15:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdagee2@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 31330 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Apr 2005 02:15:39 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=FJOos5yWXdT+ThIZKexARNb5P12FKY06uHYcgOHsBhob4X5tMRLqYhhHPz5iYDl2ZUIYlYNAdhYSjxZ5nWllcxjnRJhvXVBaiLKVNAadzKOJjBRFpp5kZqDh29yQKDjlfu5FmWgFlVTSUzdXtavSjXgayJymRXuCHq9yY5niAiY= ; Message-ID: <20050403021539.31328.qmail@web31510.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.186.70.48] by web31510.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 18:15:39 PST Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 18:15:39 -0800 (PST) From: Karl Agee To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: page fault when starting system with new hard disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 02:15:40 -0000 FreeBSD 4.11-stable. details: FreeBSD enterprise 4.11-STABLE FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE #0: Sun Jan 30 22:07:15 PST 2005 root@enterprise:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NEWKERNEL_20050130 i386 Put a new hard disk is my system today, and setup partitions for storing data files iso's etc. it is setup as a slave drive on the ide channel the master drive that freebsd lives on. It is a seagate barracuda 160 gb ata100. When I boot, I get this error: (couldnt write all of this down and it kept going:) ad7: Read commmand timeout tag=0 (something) -resetting (does this a few times with some other output) Then I get this: Fatal Trap12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address =0x7800bc fault code =supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer =0x8:0xc01d72ec stack pointer = 0x10:0xc03698ec frame pointer = (same evil hex code) code segment = base0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def 32,1, gran1 processor eflags = interupt enabled, resume, fopl=0 current process = idle interupt mask = hio trap number = 12 panic: page fault syncing disks... done rebooting in 15 seconds --karl __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. http://personals.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 02:25:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092F016A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 02:25:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F8C43D41 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 02:25:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050403022543.EASR4618.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 21:25:43 -0500 From: To: "Kris Kennaway" Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 21:25:42 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050403020231.GA34554@xor.obsecurity.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: RE: 5.3 auto starting NFS by error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 02:25:45 -0000 I think your missing the whole point. It's not suppose to be doing this. This is a release build error. In the 4.x releases the kernel had NFS support complied into the default kernel, but when you have no NFS statements in rc.conf those tasks in question are not auto spawned. Why would this behavior be changed in 5.3 to one that consumes resources. It has to be a mistake. If what you assert is true then when doing a source update to 5.3 why does these nfs tasks not auto spawn there. You assertion that its designed to work that way it just plain silly and only means you know not what you talk about. Time to submit another bug report so maybe its gets fixed in 5.4 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 9:03 PM To: bob@a1poweruser.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG; Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 5.3 auto starting NFS by error On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 08:43:47PM -0500, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > This is a standard vanilla install from mini.iso cd with all the > sysinstall questions answered as no. > I have not made any changes to any /etc files. > What was delivered in the install is what the current content is. > The /etc/fstab as delivered does not have any nfs mounts. > This is not a configuration error on my part. This is how the 5.3 > system gets installed for cd. > This is a problem with how the sysinstall process configures the > system. The GENERIC (i.e. default) kernel is configured to allow NFS client support, which means that the nfsiod kernel processes are spawned at boot time. If you don't want this, reconfigure your kernel to disable the NFS client support. Or don't, because the resource usage is negligible. Kris P.S. You're still top-posting. If you can't be bothered to format your posts properly, I won't bother to help you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 02:56:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B2216A4D0 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 02:56:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0923A43D5A for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 02:56:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6A47051452; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 18:56:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 18:56:34 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: bob@a1poweruser.com Message-ID: <20050403025634.GA50337@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050403020231.GA34554@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="azLHFNyN32YCQGCU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 5.3 auto starting NFS by error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 02:56:36 -0000 --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:25:42PM -0500, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > I think your missing the whole point. It's not suppose to be doing > this. This is a release build error. In the 4.x releases the kernel > had NFS support complied into the default kernel, but when you have > no NFS statements in rc.conf those tasks in question are not auto > spawned. Why would this behavior be changed in 5.3 to one that > consumes resources. It has to be a mistake. No, it's just intentionally different behaviour (check the source code history). If you're really that concerned about the minuscule resource usage involved, then you'd surely want to build your own stripped down kernel anyway to remove the many other things in GENERIC that you don't need, together with NFS_CLIENT. > If what you assert is true then when doing a source update to 5.3 > why does these nfs tasks not auto spawn there. They do, if you have NFS_CLIENT enabled in your kernel. > You assertion that its designed to work that way it just plain silly > and only means you know not what you talk about. *laughs* Right, that must be it, Bob. > Time to submit another bug report so maybe its gets fixed in 5.4 It's not broken. Kris P.S. Third request not to top-post, next time you're going in my killfile. --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCT1thWry0BWjoQKURAiZjAKD+0gAgm7Lf4OiA18XhG28BKdpeXgCg/biN KnaVog16DJHJGXroZzW39Rs= =06cd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 03:01:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B73A16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:01:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C685D43D1F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:01:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dot.icabod@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so1335387wri for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:01:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=a9X8FIJv9KVv+5Ndu7mD4Fldu7y7W2V9CMV57OvEVsP0xJfGlvHKoDvvA9wclMpxCmHLWRh5RG/SzQmWDjjWTwVDy2KbtEa+up6ahaDtrUUcaHRBdiJ5vM0Feu7FQwV73FIis0d/4VDRZvWWwmJ5JirL18FbrPYec+feDordHWw= Received: by 10.54.16.66 with SMTP id 66mr1174412wrp; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:01:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.68.16 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:01:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <992ba9c6050402190170c30e46@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:01:54 +1000 From: Ryan O'Donnell To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ryan O'Donnell List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 03:01:55 -0000 To whom it may concern, I tried installing freeBSD, but I think I might have ruined the installation, because now when I try booting up my computer it says something like - Invalid Partition Invalid Partition No /boot/loader FreeBSD/i386 boot Default 0:ad(0,a)/kernel boot: Invalid Partition No /kernel FreeBSD/i386 boot Default 0:ad(0,a)/kernel boot: What should I do to fix this? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 03:10:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E2316A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:10:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.celeritystorm.com (mail.celeritystorm.com [213.247.62.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2E143D49 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:10:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@celeritystorm.com) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (unknown [81.84.174.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.celeritystorm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988163D7D8B for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 05:18:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <424F5E32.8030104@celeritystorm.com> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 04:08:34 +0100 From: - User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (X11/20040724) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ATI RAGE Mobility [9700] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 03:10:25 -0000 Any way to get an ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 working with 3D acceleration ? Andrew Heyn wrote: >I would like to state that at one point, I did get this to work. >This was also a long time ago, when the patches mentioned >in some of the proceeding links had to be done.. (which were and probably >still are XFree86 specific) > >http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/news.html >http://am-productions.biz/docs/fujitsu-p2110.php leads to >http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Building > >I noticed that I had to make sure I rebuilt mach64.ko and some of the X >libraries regarding dri >if I was to upgrade the kernel. > >Note this from the Wiki: >"The DRM is shipped with the kernel, so you shouldn't need to build it. If >you choose to, simply run "make && make install" from the drm/bsd directory. >" >This is contrary to the suggestion to install "ports/graphics/drm." The >building referred >to above is within the X tree. > >The history to the mach64 dri support may be of interest: >http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/news.html (already gave this link) > >You can always (if you are patient) contact anholt who is rather busy on >freenode.net in >#dri. Beware, I asked a question there, and fixed it myself before I got an >answer. > >Hope this helps more than my other post. >It still sucked pretty bad once I got DRI working with my mach64, but... >It was better... > >Thanks! >Andrew > > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Mark Busby >Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:23 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: re: ATI RAGE Mobility > > >On Monday 28 March 2005 20:25, Edwin Mons wrote: > > >>On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:20:50 +0200, Edwin Mons wrote: >> >> >>>I'm trying to enable DRI on my IBM ThinkPad A20m, which has an ATI >>>Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x rev 100 GPU onboard. I succesfully >>>installed the mach64 DRM module, which shows the following lines in> > >>> >>> >my dmesg: > > >>>drm0: port 0x2000-0x20ff mem >>>0xf4200000-0xf4200fff,0xf5000000-0xf5ffffff irq 11 at device 0.0 on >>>pci1 >>>info: [drm] AGP at 0xf8000000 64MB >>>info: [drm] Initialized mach64 1.0.0 20020904 on minor 0 >>> >>>However, when I start X.org 6.8.2, it doesn't show anything about >>>DRM in the logfiles (attached). glxinfo reports it doesn't use >>>Direct Rendering as well. >>> >>>Attached is my xorg.conf, as well. >>> >>>My questions: 1) does anybody know if it is possible to have DRI on >>>this configuration at all, and 2) how does one get it to work? >>> >>> > > > > >from kernel LINT file ># DRM options: ># mgadrm: AGP Matrox G200, G400, G450, G550 ># tdfxdrm: 3dfx Voodoo 3/4/5 and Banshee ># r128drm: ATI Rage 128 ># radeondrm: ATI Radeon up to 9000/9100 ># DRM_DEBUG: include debug printfs, very slow ># ># mga requires AGP in the kernel, and it is recommended ># for AGP r128 and radeon cards. >device mgadrm >device "r128drm" >device radeondrm >device tdfxdrm >options DRM_DEBUG > >You may need to add the >"device mgadrm" >Hope it helps. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 03:30:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38AB16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:30:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2F943D2D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:30:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050403033016.KLFP2192.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:30:16 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Ryan O'Donnell" , Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:30:13 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <992ba9c6050402190170c30e46@mail.gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 03:30:17 -0000 Reinstall from scratch using cd install disk. Keep trying until you get it correct. That's how you learn FreeBSD. Follow instructions from this url http://freebsd.easyasthat.co.uk/ -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ryan O'Donnell Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 10:02 PM To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: question To whom it may concern, I tried installing freeBSD, but I think I might have ruined the installation, because now when I try booting up my computer it says something like - Invalid Partition Invalid Partition No /boot/loader FreeBSD/i386 boot Default 0:ad(0,a)/kernel boot: Invalid Partition No /kernel FreeBSD/i386 boot Default 0:ad(0,a)/kernel boot: What should I do to fix this? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 03:39:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC5016A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:39:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web31509.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31509.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FB3343D39 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:39:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdagee2@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 37592 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Apr 2005 03:39:33 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=TtuUJqqrMvtHjZjduipLqb/qgXwcQOdFRwVsTwUpPRMtHXqbh5HMQQCr0aLmcue+gZSqzaxUt7YD+wZFtpqXPuXwFx7a5nim9pmVkjfS0QzeMMFPW/SsghFUJup9IwMpYwJdJps2TbMOBD6l+i+xWc2iwfBasSaHl1Zg2XLGCC0= ; Message-ID: <20050403033933.37590.qmail@web31509.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.186.70.48] by web31509.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:39:33 PST Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:39:33 -0800 (PST) From: Karl Agee To: Dan Nelson In-Reply-To: 6667 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: su: illegal option -- s X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 03:39:34 -0000 Dan: Thanks, this seems to have worked. --karl --- Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Apr 02), Karl Agee said: > > FreeBSD 4.11-Stable, bash 2.05. > > > > I am getting an error when I try to launch a > daemon > > script manually as root, or in > /usr/local/etc/rc.d: > > > > -su-2.05b# > /usr/local/koha/intranet/scripts/z3950daemon/z3950-daemon-launch.sh > > -su-2.05b# su: illegal option -- s > > usage: su [-] [-flm] [-c class] [login [args]] > > > > The line in the script that calls this is: > > > > su -s /bin/sh -c $KohaZ3950Shell - $RunAsUser & > > > > The su man page indicates that the -s option isnt > supported....how > > can I edit this so this function works?? > > That's really weird su syntax there. Try > > su - $RunasUser -c $KohaZ3950Shell > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 05:11:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC17616A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 05:11:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpauth06.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth06.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913B143D1D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 05:11:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rpratt1950@earthlink.net) Received: from [65.41.159.229] (helo=kt.weeble.com) by smtpauth06.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DHxOZ-0001Q1-Un; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:11:36 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=test1; d=earthlink.net; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=M/FXkZmgbv1x2FOALTspRtIibmD/tPsM84vVhvXU1QU/SWlTrv2/pjgOmZ5OmXWb; Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:11:34 -0500 From: Randy Pratt To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com Message-Id: <20050403001134.6e18a247.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: References: <992ba9c6050402190170c30e46@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 96132b9c1759af1df21c5f5255d6c174239a348a220c2609e0cc44b1486dca6adc43cb7aab9dc210350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 65.41.159.229 cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org cc: dot.icabod@gmail.com Subject: Re: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 05:11:38 -0000 On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:30:13 -0500 "fbsd_user" wrote: > Reinstall from scratch using cd install disk. > Keep trying until you get it correct. > That's how you learn FreeBSD. > > Follow instructions from this url > http://freebsd.easyasthat.co.uk/ Is there something wrong with the installation instructions at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install.html I keep seeing you recommend that site (yours?) as the instructions to follow. If there's something lacking in the official instructions, wouldn't it be better to update those so they get a proper peer review? Best regards, Randy > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ryan > O'Donnell > Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 10:02 PM > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org > Subject: question > > To whom it may concern, > I tried installing freeBSD, but I think I might have ruined the > installation, because now when I try booting up my computer it says > something like - > > Invalid Partition > Invalid Partition > No /boot/loader > > FreeBSD/i386 boot > Default 0:ad(0,a)/kernel > boot: > Invalid Partition > No /kernel > > FreeBSD/i386 boot > Default 0:ad(0,a)/kernel > boot: > > > What should I do to fix this? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 05:22:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8A816A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 05:22:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A98943D31 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 05:22:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so941320rng for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:22:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=p/58zU6bImhoxrPGat2by1qK3umDLehoUiItwu7YgKrY9HXRaHJZsZr8ix+1I8gQ5RUZ5jpjC1Ev3+7n6JOFJ924sgVBaHxAHFW5CGajInO6IomtkBmPlAsvtna2LU320fX5BMBZc9+8jptH8HYOiTybDnpVwqGMHYHkAY37Kzo= Received: by 10.39.1.30 with SMTP id d30mr3266550rni; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:22:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 21:22:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 07:22:19 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: Subject: Re: fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 05:22:28 -0000 On Mar 31, 2005 3:34 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > Is boot0 a bootmanager ? > I booted cd2 went into fixit mode did mount /dev/ad1 /mnt cd /mnt/boot fdisk -B -b /dev/ad1 boot0 fdisk ask me to write boot record i said yes fdisk ask me to write partition table i said no but i still dont have my freebsd bootmanager back and windows get loaded :( what did i do wrong ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 05:43:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C6516A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 05:43:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FDE43D1F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 05:43:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so943091rng for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:43:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ig41w1wSdy1WVK7FLdoo4HxSHH3t7XElfi5gIZfNm0yfwmogOv7NrNCkw+NUfPAy0hTS/ItrazYIu9OcQNh1wwGMHNTus9OM7D8ltUuWgAxZ0+rR1WEK+j5ZMvU1CQ9lHuPc3KvoYkHYe3oATuq7jGJZPKjNDgZjD98cP75fQnM= Received: by 10.38.87.21 with SMTP id k21mr4067706rnb; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:43:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 21:43:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 07:43:47 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: Subject: Re: fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 05:43:48 -0000 On Apr 3, 2005 7:22 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Mar 31, 2005 3:34 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > Is boot0 a bootmanager ? > > > > I booted cd2 went into fixit mode did > > mount /dev/ad1 /mnt > cd /mnt/boot > fdisk -B -b /dev/ad1 boot0 > > fdisk ask me to write boot record i said yes > fdisk ask me to write partition table i said no > > but i still dont have my freebsd bootmanager back and windows get loaded :( > what did i do wrong ? > i did it again but i answert 2 times yes now i have a boot manager this time but only f1 (windows) works when i press f2 nothing happens ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 06:22:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE7516A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:22:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54005.mail.yahoo.com (web54005.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AD2F43D1D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:22:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 44992 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Apr 2005 06:22:04 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=UE9hfi5EmsiZiZ9VMV8OSivpg5e2y5WzShZ944PdOqbbA4y/6tle2hhFw/cBN0CSFip+Bdds6MNI1RoRRrDC2W+4fptbP2SxA4mmgIh9+UCkbT9kXeDGwsQCqZ93kY2FnqVZd6f2wO538Y76sDFHRDo7640C0UuzKh4v7ubCOYU= ; Message-ID: <20050403062204.44990.qmail@web54005.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [147.46.44.181] by web54005.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:22:04 PST Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:22:04 -0800 (PST) From: Rob To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: rpratt1950@earthlink.net Subject: Re: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:22:05 -0000 Randy Pratt wrote: > > Is there something wrong with the installation > instructions at: > >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install.html > > I keep seeing you recommend that site (yours?) as the > instructions to follow. If there's something lacking > in the official instructions, wouldn't it be better > to update those so they get a proper peer review? Don't know if I'm out of topic here, but 2.12 Advanced Installation Guide seems to be out-of-date for 5.X install. Also, nobody seems to know how to create 5.X install floppies for headless machines. When I asked for it, all I got were the 4.X solutions, which, I think, do not work for 5.X. Rob. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 06:22:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993D016A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:22:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neptune.atopia.net (neptune.atopia.net [209.128.231.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4694343D1D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:22:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (pcp173257pcs.plsntv01.nj.comcast.net [68.46.70.16]) by neptune.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF914105 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:22:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <424F8B94.7050006@atopia.net> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:22:12 -0500 From: Matt Juszczak User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041129) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: IPFILTER and NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:22:13 -0000 Howdy, Trying to get IPFILTER and NFS working. A google search didn't show much about my specific issue. With ipfilter working, nfs initially works, until someone tries to login. Then it stops working. With my firewall down on the NFS-CLIENT machine, it works fine. Any ideas? It appears to be an issue with random ports.... Thanks, Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 06:33:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548D616A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:33:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp804.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp804.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 362F743D2F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:33:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pmessri@sbcglobal.net) Received: from unknown (HELO pd) (pmessri@sbcglobal.net@68.125.33.212 with login) by smtp804.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2005 06:33:58 -0000 Message-ID: <001001c53817$6bad2600$0501a8c0@pd> From: "Pedram M" To: Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:36:08 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: FreeBSD Tuning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:33:59 -0000 Hi guys, Anyone can give me references or suggestions on what to do tune FreeBSD for a heavily loaded mail server? Any suggestions for kernel tuning, sysctl tuning, network tuning, etc.. will be helpful The machine specs are: Pentium 4, 2.4GHZ 512 MB RAM 80GB IDE Drive I am considering running FreeBSD 4.9, any other suggestions would help. Regards, PD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 06:56:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD5316A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:56:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net (vms044pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F2B43D49 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:56:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ([4.27.46.32])0.04 <0IEC00CX8Z9NUF34@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:56:11 -0600 (CST) Received: by ringworm.mechee.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E63012CE93F; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 14:23:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 14:23:28 -0800 From: "Michael C. Shultz" In-reply-to: <424EEB21.1010109@mail.ru> To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200504021423.28745.ringworm01@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <424EEB21.1010109@mail.ru> User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Subject: Re: Some kind of intranet update system for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:56:12 -0000 On Saturday 02 April 2005 10:57 am, Andrew P. wrote: > Hello! > > I know this has been brought up a number of times > and I doubt that it is the right place to post to > or even a right subject to raise, but still. > > It seems we lack some update system in FreeBSD. I > have only 2 freebsd boxes, one serving as an > internet gateway for the other. And whenever I want > to update the latter one, I think about all the > traffic that I'm gonna waste and CPU time to build > and my own time to get some distros from one machine > to another. > > I dream about a server running on my main machine, > which gets queries from intranet freebsd boxes that > want to be updated. The server negotiates with each > client and acts as requested: > 1.1) fetches a binary package, or > 1.2) fetches a source package, or > 1.3) finds a binary/source in its cache, and > 2) builds a package if needed, and > 3) gives binary/source to the client > > Is that so difficult? C'mon guys, just one step > forward to perfection :) > > Very best wishes, > Andrew P. Its doable, providing both boxes have identical CPU's and the port build options on both have the same options. If the CPU's are not identical are you willing to build every thing to the lowest common denominator such as CPUTYPE?=i486 ? If this is the case then really all you have to do is make sure you have a /usr/ports/packages dir on one machine then upgrade portmanager -u. This will put a package for everything upgraded into /usr/ports/packages/All. nfs share /usr/ports/packages/All directory with the other machine and on that one upgrade with something like portupgrade -aP. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 06:59:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB98C16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:59:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D3143D45 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:59:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4E20751452; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:59:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:59:51 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Pedram M Message-ID: <20050403065951.GA14786@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <001001c53817$6bad2600$0501a8c0@pd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001001c53817$6bad2600$0501a8c0@pd> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Tuning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:59:52 -0000 --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 10:36:08PM -0800, Pedram M wrote: > Hi guys, >=20 > Anyone can give me references or suggestions on what to do tune FreeBSD f= or > a heavily loaded mail server? > Any suggestions for kernel tuning, sysctl tuning, network tuning, etc.. w= ill > be helpful Start with the tuning manpage :) Kris --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCT5RmWry0BWjoQKURAs+VAKDCQetwoPbrX4HnwIJlyY9eiybQBQCgtZkd +4XpfmIv94lAI7WhyI3C4dA= =fY1v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 08:10:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9536A16A4CE; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:10:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [66.154.97.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4862F43D39; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3C35563; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:10:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76977-05; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:10:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4C0C554D8; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:10:03 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050403081003.4C0C554D8@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:10:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2005-03-13 - 2005-04-02 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:10:18 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 08:26:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B34C16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:26:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC9643D41 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:26:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1104.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7D5871C000AC for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:26:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1104.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 67C3D1C00086 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:26:57 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050403082657425.67C3D1C00086@mwinf1104.wanadoo.fr Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:26:57 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1438401134.20050403102657@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <810a540e0504020157786d9696@mail.gmail.com> References: <000001c53763$b1a9ea80$9900000a@ZGISH> <810a540e0504020157786d9696@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Which mail server is the best for me? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:26:59 -0000 Pat Maddox writes: > sendmail is insecure ... Why? -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 08:43:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E972D16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:43:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F3D43D31 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:43:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j338hlji089395 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:43:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 634F5625B; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:43:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:43:47 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050403084347.GA97530@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <424F5E32.8030104@celeritystorm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <424F5E32.8030104@celeritystorm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! Organization: Me, organized? X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: ATI RAGE Mobility [9700] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:43:50 -0000 --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:08:34AM +0100, - wrote: > Any way to get an ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 working with 3D acceleration ? No. Ati only supplies windows and Linux drivers. The open source drivers in xorg only support up to the Radeon 9250. But see http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-January/017723.html Roland --=20 R.F. Smith /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign r s m i t h @ x s 4 a l l . n l \ / No HTML/RTF in e-mail http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ X No Word docs in e-mail public key: http://www.keyserver.net / \ Respect for open standards --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCT6zDEnfvsMMhpyURAs6BAKCwXn9yP6eXluBCo0bzOehvMcyaPwCfUI97 pKBf/LRsZ/w2whgiSXp+oDY= =Rag2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 08:45:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A74816A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:45:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAEB43D41 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:45:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.21] (port=3693 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DI0j6-0000Bs-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:45:00 +0400 Message-ID: <424FAD11.5090701@mail.ru> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:45:05 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael C. Shultz" References: <424EEB21.1010109@mail.ru> <200504021423.28745.ringworm01@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200504021423.28745.ringworm01@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some kind of intranet update system for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:45:04 -0000 Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Saturday 02 April 2005 10:57 am, Andrew P. wrote: > >>Hello! >> >>I know this has been brought up a number of times >>and I doubt that it is the right place to post to >>or even a right subject to raise, but still. >> >>It seems we lack some update system in FreeBSD. I >>have only 2 freebsd boxes, one serving as an >>internet gateway for the other. And whenever I want >>to update the latter one, I think about all the >>traffic that I'm gonna waste and CPU time to build >>and my own time to get some distros from one machine >>to another. >> >>I dream about a server running on my main machine, >>which gets queries from intranet freebsd boxes that >>want to be updated. The server negotiates with each >>client and acts as requested: >> 1.1) fetches a binary package, or >> 1.2) fetches a source package, or >> 1.3) finds a binary/source in its cache, and >> 2) builds a package if needed, and >> 3) gives binary/source to the client >> >>Is that so difficult? C'mon guys, just one step >>forward to perfection :) >> >>Very best wishes, >>Andrew P. > > > Its doable, providing both boxes have identical CPU's and > the port build options on both have the same options. If the CPU's > are not identical are you willing to build every thing to the lowest > common denominator such as CPUTYPE?=i486 ? If this is the > case then really all you have to do is make sure you have > a /usr/ports/packages dir on one machine then upgrade portmanager -u. > This will put a package for everything upgraded > into /usr/ports/packages/All. nfs share /usr/ports/packages/All > directory with the other machine and on that one upgrade with something > like portupgrade -aP. > > -Mike Thanks, I'll try to do this via ftp. What about the system itself? Is there an easy way to copy all the binaries from one box to another? Thanks, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 09:43:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16A116A4E2 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:43:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E4543D1F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:43:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j339gXJ7010729; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:42:34 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j339hNVm076194; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:43:23 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j339hNAx076193; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:43:23 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:43:23 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Randy Pratt Message-ID: <20050403094323.GB75971@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <992ba9c6050402190170c30e46@mail.gmail.com> <20050403001134.6e18a247.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050403001134.6e18a247.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: dot.icabod@gmail.com Subject: Re: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:43:29 -0000 On 2005-04-03 00:11, Randy Pratt wrote: >On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:30:13 -0500 >"fbsd_user" wrote: >> Reinstall from scratch using cd install disk. Keep trying until you >> get it correct. That's how you learn FreeBSD. >> >> Follow instructions from this url >> http://freebsd.easyasthat.co.uk/ > > Is there something wrong with the installation instructions at: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install.html > > I keep seeing you recommend that site (yours?) as the instructions to > follow. It's ok. There may be very good bits there (I haven't had a chance to read the entire document yet), so it's not very bad to suggest using it. If there are parts that we could include in the official FreeBSD doc/ tree, that would be great too. So, if anyone has used the aforementioned guide and found parts that are not covered by the official docs, please mail either me directly or the freebsd-doc list. > If there's something lacking in the official instructions, wouldn't it > be better to update those so they get a proper peer review? Agreed. Updating the official documentation, where it lacks, seems like a good thing. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 09:44:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F3016A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:44:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51107.mail.yahoo.com (web51107.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C23B343D4C for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:44:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fasi_74@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 9269 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Apr 2005 09:44:58 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=neSulJxRdNPSHN136+hoBqNxV+Hz2Fttv46F+8jRT58KAmD53f3jJsD6yrf1ovctg6u4iP3Tkh2XSEIndC89rAInuJMOU1/2hZ1foHYdG0PjDRWYVOfWXSv4vwpOjKbE5MWmcEl8maeqn1RuVxh3R3TiDbY67VQ8kqH67ce4BRg= ; Message-ID: <20050403094458.9267.qmail@web51107.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.147.160.231] by web51107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:44:57 PST Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:44:57 -0800 (PST) From: faisal gillani To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: FreeBSD Subject: Hyperthreading not working on my 5.3 FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:44:59 -0000 Well the output of my dmesg command is only showing 1 processor , HT is enabled in bios , & working on windows XP on the same PC. what can be wrong ? is there anyway to enable it ? thanks *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ Allah-hu-Akber*º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ God is the Greatest __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 09:44:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4DD16A4CF for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:44:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51107.mail.yahoo.com (web51107.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5F3543D53 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:44:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fasi_74@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 9269 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Apr 2005 09:44:58 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=neSulJxRdNPSHN136+hoBqNxV+Hz2Fttv46F+8jRT58KAmD53f3jJsD6yrf1ovctg6u4iP3Tkh2XSEIndC89rAInuJMOU1/2hZ1foHYdG0PjDRWYVOfWXSv4vwpOjKbE5MWmcEl8maeqn1RuVxh3R3TiDbY67VQ8kqH67ce4BRg= ; Message-ID: <20050403094458.9267.qmail@web51107.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.147.160.231] by web51107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:44:57 PST Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:44:57 -0800 (PST) From: faisal gillani To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: FreeBSD Subject: Hyperthreading not working on my 5.3 FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:44:59 -0000 Well the output of my dmesg command is only showing 1 processor , HT is enabled in bios , & working on windows XP on the same PC. what can be wrong ? is there anyway to enable it ? thanks *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ Allah-hu-Akber*º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ God is the Greatest __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 09:46:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5080016A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:46:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11EEA43D45 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:46:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j339k3sj008986; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:46:03 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j339koXx076267; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:46:50 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j339knm3076266; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:46:49 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:46:49 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Pedram M Message-ID: <20050403094649.GC75971@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <001001c53817$6bad2600$0501a8c0@pd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001001c53817$6bad2600$0501a8c0@pd> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Tuning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:46:54 -0000 On 2005-04-02 22:36, Pedram M wrote: > Anyone can give me references or suggestions on what to do tune > FreeBSD for a heavily loaded mail server? > > Any suggestions for kernel tuning, sysctl tuning, network tuning, > etc.. will be helpful A good starting point would probably be the tuning(7) manpage. For performance tweaks specific to your particular MTA, a Google search is probably the best you can do. Most of the time, the changes you can do to improve performance for MTAs apply (more or less) to all UNIX systems. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 09:49:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523CE16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:49:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51110.mail.yahoo.com (web51110.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D274D43D46 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:49:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fasi_74@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 5272 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Apr 2005 09:49:53 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=sii/b8931wcsDZFrXe6pQoDvf/youO4bbsAdvoROCL8zktVeOwMYp8Vk/BtHO6Uv3lbDTmkPqrARBzQFTguw0pHvXNIfaw7GxBpZj96F1y173H2w5W8VfaoHj7O04f8lC+Ifb+dQgWgKz6xwYfu4po9104JWKdpShSBfU8G/hBI= ; Message-ID: <20050403094953.5269.qmail@web51110.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.147.160.231] by web51110.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:49:53 PST Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:49:53 -0800 (PST) From: faisal gillani To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Sound problem ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:49:55 -0000 i configured Freebsd as my desktop, everything is working fine , except sound , freebsd havent seemed to pick up my sound card .. or its not configured , is there any utility there to configure sound ? thanks *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ Allah-hu-Akber*º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ God is the Greatest __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. http://personals.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 10:07:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F3616A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:07:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cujo.runbox.com (cujo.runbox.com [193.71.199.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C4B43D31 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:07:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mburki@mburki.com) Received: from [10.9.9.11] (helo=fifi.runbox.com) by greyhound.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DI219-0004DC-Es; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:07:43 +0200 Received: from [83.76.49.64] (helo=[10.3.70.3]) by fifi.runbox.com with asmtp (uid:358042) (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1DI219-0008D4-BX; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:07:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20050403094953.5269.qmail@web51110.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050403094953.5269.qmail@web51110.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <0a092b14d79a391125f23a1d3e6cb12f@mburki.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Manuel Burki Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:07:40 +0200 To: faisal gillani X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Sender: 358042 cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Sound problem ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:07:47 -0000 > i configured Freebsd as my desktop, everything is > working fine , except sound , freebsd havent seemed to > pick up my sound card .. or its not configured , is > there any utility there to configure sound ? There you go... http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound- setup.html I hope that gives you an idea how to setup your sound card. regards, Manuel Burki From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 10:08:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E9C16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:08:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from engraver.valleygate.net (12-240-1-161.client.mchsi.com [12.240.1.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6076343D31 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:08:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wizlayer@gmail.com) Received: from wizard.valleygate.net (wizard.valleygate.net [10.51.10.3]) j33A85eH053216; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:08:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wizlayer@gmail.com) From: wizlayer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:08:03 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050403094953.5269.qmail@web51110.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050403094953.5269.qmail@web51110.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504030608.04117.wizlayer@gmail.com> cc: fasi_74@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Sound problem ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: wizlayer@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:08:07 -0000 On Sunday 03 April 2005 05:49 am, faisal gillani wrote: > i configured Freebsd as my desktop, everything is > working fine , except sound , freebsd havent seemed to > pick up my sound card .. or its not configured , is > there any utility there to configure sound ? > > thanks > > > *=BA=A4., =B8=B8,.=A4=BA*=A8=A8=A8*=A4 Allah-hu-Akber*=BA=A4., =B8=B8,.= =A4=BA*=A8=A8*=A4 > God is the Greatest > Have you gone through the multimedia section of the handbook? If=20 not, have a look at the following link (link may wrap in email): http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.html HTH, WizLayer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 10:12:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6F516A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:12:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp809.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp809.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7521F43D3F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:12:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pmessri@sbcglobal.net) Received: from unknown (HELO pd) (pmessri@sbcglobal.net@68.125.33.212 with login) by smtp809.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2005 10:12:14 -0000 Message-ID: <001301c53835$a6ab8d50$0501a8c0@pd> From: "Pedram M" To: "Giorgos Keramidas" References: <001001c53817$6bad2600$0501a8c0@pd> <20050403094649.GC75971@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:12:32 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Tuning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:12:15 -0000 Yeah I read the tuning manpage, Not enough, need more :) Regards, PD ----- Original Message ----- From: "Giorgos Keramidas" To: "Pedram M" Cc: Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 2:46 AM Subject: Re: FreeBSD Tuning > On 2005-04-02 22:36, Pedram M wrote: > > Anyone can give me references or suggestions on what to do tune > > FreeBSD for a heavily loaded mail server? > > > > Any suggestions for kernel tuning, sysctl tuning, network tuning, > > etc.. will be helpful > > A good starting point would probably be the tuning(7) manpage. > > For performance tweaks specific to your particular MTA, a Google search > is probably the best you can do. Most of the time, the changes you can > do to improve performance for MTAs apply (more or less) to all UNIX systems. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 11:04:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDD016A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:04:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2C943D49 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:04:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.0.32] (charm.daemonsecurity.com [192.168.0.32]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D5CFD068; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:04:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <424FCDD3.6040507@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:04:51 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050314 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, en-gb, da, fr, de, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Juszczak References: <424F8B94.7050006@atopia.net> In-Reply-To: <424F8B94.7050006@atopia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFILTER and NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:04:56 -0000 Matt Juszczak wrote: > Howdy, > > Trying to get IPFILTER and NFS working. A google search didn't show > much about my specific issue. With ipfilter working, nfs initially > works, until someone tries to login. Then it stops working. With my > firewall down on the NFS-CLIENT machine, it works fine. Any ideas? > > It appears to be an issue with random ports.... It is, NFS is an RPC service where the RPC deamon is requested to for info on which port mountd binds to. I wrote an howto for diskless clients, www.daemonsecurity.com/pxe/ - here's what to do: Enable nfs in /etc/rc.conf: rpcbind_enable="YES" # Run the portmapper service (YES/NO). nfs_server_enable="YES" # This host is an NFS server (or NO). mountd_enable="YES" # Run mountd (or NO). mountd_flags="-r -p 59" # Force mountd to bind on port 59 As a minimum you need to enable rpcbind, nfsserver and mountd. lockd and statd provides file locking and status monitoring. By default, when mountd starts it binds to some arbitrary port, and rpc is used to discover which, making it imposible to firewall. With option '-p' mountd can be forced to bind to a specific port. Port 59 is assigned to "any private file service" (see /etc/services). This limits the number of ports relevant to 59, 111 and 2049. You can't force lockd and statd to bind to specific ports (they are alos RPC services) and AFAIK you can't have disk quotas work correctly because of this. AFAIK NFS4 should address these problems, but the NFS4 server is still experimental. Till then, RPC is a security nightmare. Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 11:05:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7500F16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:05:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC5643D4C for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:05:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j33B4ntb026353; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:04:50 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j33B5aSm076911; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:05:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j33B5aaO076910; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:05:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:05:35 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Pedram M Message-ID: <20050403110535.GA76884@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <001001c53817$6bad2600$0501a8c0@pd> <20050403094649.GC75971@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <001301c53835$a6ab8d50$0501a8c0@pd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001301c53835$a6ab8d50$0501a8c0@pd> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Tuning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:05:40 -0000 On 2005-04-03 03:12, Pedram M wrote: >Giorgos Keramidas [keramida@ceid.upatras.gr] wrote: >>On 2005-04-02 22:36, Pedram M wrote: >>> Anyone can give me references or suggestions on what to do tune >>> FreeBSD for a heavily loaded mail server? >>> >>> Any suggestions for kernel tuning, sysctl tuning, network tuning, >>> etc.. will be helpful >> >> A good starting point would probably be the tuning(7) manpage. >> >> For performance tweaks specific to your particular MTA, a Google search >> is probably the best you can do. Most of the time, the changes you can >> do to improve performance for MTAs apply (more or less) to all UNIX systems. > > Yeah I read the tuning manpage, > Not enough, need more :) Then you will have to tell us more about the MTA you are using, the current setup and the expected load (in number of messages per day, hour, the number of users it supports, etc.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 11:42:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4DD16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:42:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AABC43D48 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:42:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1112.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 05E901C000A1 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:42:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1112.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E1B5E1C00094 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:42:46 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050403114246924.E1B5E1C00094@mwinf1112.wanadoo.fr Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:42:46 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <791630627.20050403134246@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050403094458.9267.qmail@web51107.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050403094458.9267.qmail@web51107.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Hyperthreading not working on my 5.3 FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:42:48 -0000 faisal gillani writes: > Well the output of my dmesg command is only showing 1 > processor , HT is enabled in bios , & working on > windows XP on the same PC. > what can be wrong ? is there anyway to enable it ? Recompile the kernel with options SMP You should then see the second logical processor come online with no problems after installing the new kernel and rebooting. -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 13:19:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF7B16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:19:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D666543D2D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:19:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3091A60D6; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:19:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17769-04; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:19:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A998460D4; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:19:35 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <424FED69.2030604@makeworld.com> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:19:37 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050327) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gert Cuykens References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:19:43 -0000 Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Apr 3, 2005 7:22 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > >>On Mar 31, 2005 3:34 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: >> >>>Is boot0 a bootmanager ? >>> >> >>I booted cd2 went into fixit mode did >> >>mount /dev/ad1 /mnt >>cd /mnt/boot >>fdisk -B -b /dev/ad1 boot0 >> >>fdisk ask me to write boot record i said yes >>fdisk ask me to write partition table i said no >> >>but i still dont have my freebsd bootmanager back and windows get loaded :( >>what did i do wrong ? >> > > > i did it again but i answert 2 times yes now > i have a boot manager this time but only f1 (windows) works when i > press f2 nothing happens ? I believe the handbook covers dual booting. Please consider reading it a few times - as I mentioned before, the Handbook will answer most of your questions. In addition, search this list for "other" methods of doing dual boots with Windows. It's been covered many times. -- Best regards, Chris Real programmers can do octal, hexadecimal and binary math in their heads. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 13:22:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E3916A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:22:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7AB43D2D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:22:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 2559 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2005 13:22:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([pbs]775067@[83.129.8.235]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 3 Apr 2005 13:22:03 -0000 Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:22:04 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: infofarmer@mail.ru Message-ID: <20050403152204.778ec85f@localhost> In-Reply-To: <424FAD11.5090701@mail.ru> References: <424EEB21.1010109@mail.ru> <200504021423.28745.ringworm01@gmail.com> <424FAD11.5090701@mail.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: "Michael C. Shultz" Subject: Re: Some kind of intranet update system for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:22:06 -0000 "Andrew P." wrote: > Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > On Saturday 02 April 2005 10:57 am, Andrew P. wrote: > >>It seems we lack some update system in FreeBSD. I > >>have only 2 freebsd boxes, one serving as an > >>internet gateway for the other. And whenever I want > >>to update the latter one, I think about all the > >>traffic that I'm gonna waste and CPU time to build > >>and my own time to get some distros from one machine > >>to another. > >> > >>I dream about a server running on my main machine, > >>which gets queries from intranet freebsd boxes that > >>want to be updated. The server negotiates with each > >>client and acts as requested: > >> 1.1) fetches a binary package, or > >> 1.2) fetches a source package, or > >> 1.3) finds a binary/source in its cache, and > >> 2) builds a package if needed, and > >> 3) gives binary/source to the client > > Its doable, providing both boxes have identical CPU's and > > the port build options on both have the same options. If the CPU's > > are not identical are you willing to build every thing to the lowest > > common denominator such as CPUTYPE?=i486 ? If this is the > > case then really all you have to do is make sure you have > > a /usr/ports/packages dir on one machine then upgrade portmanager -u. > > This will put a package for everything upgraded > > into /usr/ports/packages/All. nfs share /usr/ports/packages/All > > directory with the other machine and on that one upgrade with something > > like portupgrade -aP. > Thanks, I'll try to do this via ftp. What about the > system itself? Is there an easy way to copy all the > binaries from one box to another? Your building machine can share /usr/src/ via nfs. You can then do a "make buildworld" on the server and "make installworld" on every machine. If the kernels are the same, you can use the same build on every machine as well. As Michael has already mentioned, you have to keep /etc/make.conf general. Since FreeBSD has no ftpfs, using nfs seems to be the easier way. Fabian -- http://www.fabiankeil.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 13:43:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C54416A4D0 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:43:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35E243D31 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:43:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sadashiv.linux@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so977987rng for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:43:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uQC0R7MKreV7T9abFYPWhicl2hlfbgUSBa4GD5f/WJcRj8ytRNeYd8eGR6z0Ti03IswNyCbEf1nYJsW24EBSmUevJR1B6O9M1ya4/V8yFhOXxI0uEnrMUhjlFwqxTMdvLxWc21AY4r+g5+BOLbqxbCUO8Tq1a7pjHD/CSmKaf4g= Received: by 10.38.69.34 with SMTP id r34mr4358697rna; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.9.39 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:43:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:13:04 +0530 From: Sadashiv Kulthe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: webalizer package installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sadashiv Kulthe List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:43:08 -0000 Hello, I am trying to install webalizer. I am newbie and I have tried a lot. But it is giving me error .. checking for main in -lpng... no configure: error: png library not found... please install Png. checking for libgd.so... (cached) no configure: error: gd library not found... please install gd. 1) How to install gd and png libraries? Can you provide me url? How to check they are installed or not? 2) I also want to install a JAVA on freeBSD. What are the packages requires, how to install them. I know pkg_add command. 3) How to check what packages are install on the system and how to resolve dependacies. Thanks and Regards Sadashiv Kulthe. System Administrator Open Source Labs - Pune sadashiv.linux@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 14:15:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F10016A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:15:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D782D43D1F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:15:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.21] (port=1191 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx1.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DI5sX-000F4l-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:15:05 +0400 Message-ID: <424FFA6D.6050401@mail.ru> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:15:09 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fabian Keil References: <424EEB21.1010109@mail.ru> <200504021423.28745.ringworm01@gmail.com> <424FAD11.5090701@mail.ru> <20050403152204.778ec85f@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20050403152204.778ec85f@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: "Michael C. Shultz" Subject: Re: Some kind of intranet update system for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:15:07 -0000 Fabian Keil wrote: > "Andrew P." wrote: > >>>>I dream about a server running on my main machine, >>>>which gets queries from intranet freebsd boxes that >>>>want to be updated. The server negotiates with each >>>>client and acts as requested: >>>> 1.1) fetches a binary package, or >>>> 1.2) fetches a source package, or >>>> 1.3) finds a binary/source in its cache, and >>>> 2) builds a package if needed, and >>>> 3) gives binary/source to the client > > >>>Its doable, providing both boxes have identical CPU's and >>>the port build options on both have the same options. If the CPU's >>>are not identical are you willing to build every thing to the lowest >>>common denominator such as CPUTYPE?=i486 ? If this is the >>>case then really all you have to do is make sure you have >>>a /usr/ports/packages dir on one machine then upgrade portmanager -u. >>>This will put a package for everything upgraded >>>into /usr/ports/packages/All. nfs share /usr/ports/packages/All >>>directory with the other machine and on that one upgrade with something >>>like portupgrade -aP. > > >>Thanks, I'll try to do this via ftp. What about the >>system itself? Is there an easy way to copy all the >>binaries from one box to another? > > > Your building machine can share /usr/src/ via nfs. > You can then do a "make buildworld" on the server > and "make installworld" on every machine. > > If the kernels are the same, you can use the same build > on every machine as well. As Michael has already mentioned, > you have to keep /etc/make.conf general. So basically, to substantially facilitate the update process all we have to do is to share /usr/src and /usr/ports folders? Will it be ok to share them read-only if I do all the building on the server? Is it a serious security issue to give recursive read-access to these folders to maliscious parties? (I mean besides of letting them know versions of all your server software). Thanks, Andrew P. P.S. Still, IMHO a nicely-designed port would be great. I mean we do have portupgrade for crying out loud. If we have something for a network of freebsd boxes, we could start talking enterprise-level management. P.P.S. What a pity that we don't have tarfs/ftpfs. Okay, that's just a sidenote. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 14:19:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDB016A4CE; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:19:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21BC43D31; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:19:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:13219) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DI5wR-000MMS-Nz; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:19:07 +0000 Received: from aseed.demon.nl (unknown [192.168.0.48]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE00A582539; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:19:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aseed.demon.nl (unknown [192.168.0.48]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C31758153F; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:19:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 82.94.255.120 (SquirrelMail authenticated user albi) by aseed.demon.nl with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:19:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <33131.82.94.255.120.1112537961.squirrel@aseed.demon.nl> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:19:21 +0200 (CEST) From: "albi" To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal References: In-Reply-To: X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: webalizer package installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:19:10 -0000 > 1) How to install gd and png libraries? Can you provide me url? How to > check they are installed or not? see below > 2) I also want to install a JAVA on freeBSD. What are the packages > requires, how to install them. I know pkg_add command. see here for installing java on FreeBSD : http://www.freebsd.org/java/ > 3) How to check what packages are install on the system and how to > resolve dependacies. try installing from ports : http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.htm= l running the command "pkg_info" shows you all packages installed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 14:19:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C090416A4CE; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:19:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bsdnerds.org (pcp0011384308pcs.ebrnsw01.nj.comcast.net [69.248.83.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7F243D53; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:19:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org) Received: by bsdnerds.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8C0096592; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:19:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by bsdnerds.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13792658F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:19:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E718456D6B; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:19:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE40F16A513; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:19:16 +0000 (GMT) Delivered-To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDB016A4CE; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:19:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21BC43D31; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:19:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:13219) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DI5wR-000MMS-Nz; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:19:07 +0000 Received: from aseed.demon.nl (unknown [192.168.0.48]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE00A582539; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:19:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aseed.demon.nl (unknown [192.168.0.48]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C31758153F; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:19:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 82.94.255.120 (SquirrelMail authenticated user albi) by aseed.demon.nl with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:19:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <33131.82.94.255.120.1112537961.squirrel@aseed.demon.nl> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:19:21 +0200 (CEST) From: "albi" To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal References: In-Reply-To: X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Sender: owner-freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: webalizer package installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:19:51 -0000 > 1) How to install gd and png libraries? Can you provide me url? How to > check they are installed or not? see below > 2) I also want to install a JAVA on freeBSD. What are the packages > requires, how to install them. I know pkg_add command. see here for installing java on FreeBSD : http://www.freebsd.org/java/ > 3) How to check what packages are install on the system and how to > resolve dependacies. try installing from ports : http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.htm= l running the command "pkg_info" shows you all packages installed _______________________________________________ freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 14:31:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0698516A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:31:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane.co.uk [62.140.220.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD1843D39 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:31:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from canth ([10.0.0.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j33EVmZ3077752; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:31:48 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Message-Id: <200504031431.j33EVmZ3077752@unsane.co.uk> From: "Vince" To: , "'Michael C. Shultz'" Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:31:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcU4KXZUjXrqY+f1R+iG5SEJR/jhyQAHtFpA In-Reply-To: <424FAD11.5090701@mail.ru> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Some kind of intranet update system for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:31:58 -0000 > > Thanks, I'll try to do this via ftp. What about the system > itself? Is there an easy way to copy all the binaries from > one box to another? > How about Port: freebsd-update-1.6_1 Path: /usr/ports/security/freebsd-update Info: Fetches and installs binary updates to FreeBSD Maint: cperciva@daemonology.net B-deps: R-deps: bsdiff-4.2 WWW: http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-update/ Is that the kind of thing your thinking ? > Thanks, > Andrew P. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 14:31:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E366D16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:31:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3A243D4C for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:31:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23F860D4; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:31:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18281-02; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:31:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D16460DB; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:31:55 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <424FFE5E.1040108@makeworld.com> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:31:58 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050327) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: infofarmer@mail.ru References: <424EEB21.1010109@mail.ru> <200504021423.28745.ringworm01@gmail.com> <424FAD11.5090701@mail.ru> <20050403152204.778ec85f@localhost> <424FFA6D.6050401@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <424FFA6D.6050401@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: "Michael C. Shultz" cc: Fabian Keil Subject: Re: Some kind of intranet update system for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:32:00 -0000 Andrew P. wrote: > Thanks, > Andrew P. > > > P.S. Still, IMHO a nicely-designed port would be > great. I mean we do have portupgrade for crying out > loud. If we have something for a network of freebsd > boxes, we could start talking enterprise-level > management. > > P.P.S. What a pity that we don't have tarfs/ftpfs. > Okay, that's just a sidenote. ... are you volunteering?! -- Best regards, Chris The lion and the calf shall lie down together, but the calf won't get much sleep. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 15:05:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B8F16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:05:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7100843D45 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:05:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.21] (port=1434 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx1.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DI6fI-0008k5-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:05:28 +0400 Message-ID: <4250063C.1060102@mail.ru> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:05:32 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: racerx@makeworld.com References: <424EEB21.1010109@mail.ru> <200504021423.28745.ringworm01@gmail.com> <424FAD11.5090701@mail.ru> <20050403152204.778ec85f@localhost> <424FFA6D.6050401@mail.ru> <424FFE5E.1040108@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <424FFE5E.1040108@makeworld.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: "Michael C. Shultz" cc: Fabian Keil Subject: Re: Some kind of intranet update system for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:05:30 -0000 Chris wrote: > Andrew P. wrote: > >> Thanks, >> Andrew P. >> >> >> P.S. Still, IMHO a nicely-designed port would be >> great. I mean we do have portupgrade for crying out >> loud. If we have something for a network of freebsd >> boxes, we could start talking enterprise-level >> management. >> >> P.P.S. What a pity that we don't have tarfs/ftpfs. >> Okay, that's just a sidenote. > > > ... are you volunteering?! Well, I just might be able to write a dirty perl script that would add to thousands of useless ports. However, if there a busy soul with much knowledge and an ability to guide, I think I'll be able to produce some nice code with little of his help :) I'm now thinking learning ruby and examining portupgrade's code carefully. 6-9 months at least. Best wishes, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 15:14:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA18016A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:14:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.r.caley.org.uk (82-41-208-48.cable.ubr12.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.208.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D542D43D46 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:14:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rjc@caley.org.uk) Received: from pele.r.caley.org.uk (pele.r.caley.org.uk [10.0.0.12]) by mail.r.caley.org.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j33FEaBt029474; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:14:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjc@caley.org.uk) Received: from pele.r.caley.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pele.r.caley.org.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j33FEaDV066061; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:14:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjc@bast.r.caley.org.uk) Received: (from rjc@localhost) by pele.r.caley.org.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j33FEZVv066058; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:14:35 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjc@bast.r.caley.org.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: pele.r.caley.org.uk: rjc set sender to rjc@bast.r.caley.org.uk using -f Sender: rjc@caley.org.uk To: Fabian Keil References: <424EEB21.1010109@mail.ru> <200504021423.28745.ringworm01@gmail.com> <424FAD11.5090701@mail.ru> <20050403152204.778ec85f@localhost> From: Richard Caley In-Reply-To: <20050403152204.778ec85f@localhost> Date: 03 Apr 2005 16:14:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87acof51ut.fsf@pele.r.caley.org.uk> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: infofarmer@mail.ru cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: "Michael C. Shultz" Subject: Re: Some kind of intranet update system for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:14:41 -0000 In article <20050403152204.778ec85f@localhost>, Fabian Keil (fk) writes: fk> If the kernels are the same, you can use the same build fk> on every machine as well. If they aren't it works to set KERNCONF to the whole list on the build machine KENRCONF="Macine1 Macine2 Machine3" It builds them all, but instals teh first one on this machine. -- Mail me as MYFIRSTNAME@MYLASTNAME.org.uk _O_ |< From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 15:17:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A35616A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:17:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D464D43D1D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:17:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net) Received: from [10.0.0.8] (63-225-97-116.dnvr.qwest.net[63.225.97.116]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005040315174701100ar5i2e>; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:17:47 +0000 From: Aaron Siegel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:19:04 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050403094953.5269.qmail@web51110.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050403094953.5269.qmail@web51110.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504030919.05069.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> Subject: Re: Sound problem ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: aj@siegel-tech.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:17:51 -0000 =46aisal Gillani I do not like the handbook instructions, read my whining bellow. I would=20 recommend following these procedures for configuring your sound card. The=20 instruction in this email are very similar to the handbooks. Do not try to= =20 figure out what driver you sound card using form the Hardware Notes go=20 directly to the /boot/loader.conf. =20 1 If you have added the any sound devices to you kernel configuration remov= e=20 remove them. Remove the lines=20 device sound device snd_* You may or my not have this in your kernel. If you have not added the sound= =20 driver to your kernel the skip to the next step. 2 You can easily look all the available sound drivers in=20 the /boot/loader.conf. (the following list is from 5.3-STABLE, it may not=20 match the drivers on your system) : sound_load=3D"YES" # Digital sound subsystem snd_ad1816_load=3D"NO" # ad1816 snd_als4000_load=3D"NO" # als4000 snd_cmi_load=3D"NO" # cmi snd_cs4281_load=3D"NO" # cs4281 snd_csa_load=3D"NO" # csa snd_ds1_load=3D"NO" # ds1 snd_emu10k1_load=3D"NO" # Creative Sound Blaster Live snd_es137x_load=3D"NO" # es137x snd_ess_load=3D"NO" # ess snd_fm801_load=3D"NO" # fm801 snd_ich_load=3D"NO" # Intel ICH snd_maestro_load=3D"NO" # Maestro snd_maestro3_load=3D"NO" # Maestro3 snd_mss_load=3D"NO" # Mss snd_neomagic_load=3D"NO" # Neomagic snd_sb16_load=3D"NO" # Sound Blaster 16 snd_sb8_load=3D"NO" # Sound Blaster Pro snd_sbc_load=3D"NO" # Sbc snd_solo_load=3D"NO" # Solo snd_t4dwave_load=3D"NO" # t4dwave snd_via8233_load=3D"NO" # via8233 snd_via82c686_load=3D"NO" # via82c686 snd_vibes_load=3D"NO" # vibes snd_driver_load=3D"NO" # All sound drivers 2 If you now what driver supports your card you can test the driver by usin= g=20 kldload=20 # kldload snd_ You can test to see if your sound card is support by FreeBSD and load all t= he=20 sound drivers with ( I believe this will work, it has been months since I=20 have done this) #kldload snd_driver This will test all the snd drivers. =09 3. You will now need to configure your /boot/loader.conf so that the driver= =20 will load every time you reboot your computer. Add the following lines to= =20 your /boot/loader.conf sound_load=3D"YES" snd_=3D"YES" You can load all the sound driver with snd_driver_load=3D"YES"=20 I hope this helps Aaron Siegel My whining attached bellow =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D-------- This is one section in the manual I do not like, I found if made configurin= g=20 the sound card more complicated than it needs to be. To add to being=20 complicated it was hard to determine what driver are available. The hardwa= re=20 notes,=20 http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/hardware-i386.html#AUDIO, is not=20 consistant. It names the drive that support some cards but does give the=20 driver used by other cards. For example, it clearly shows the Advance Asoun= d=20 100 and 110 uses a sbc driver but the hardware notes does not mention what= =20 drive supports the VIA Technologies VT82C686A. There are no man pages =20 written for most of the sound drivers nor are their any references to the t= o=20 them in the man pages. The only drives listed in the man pages snd_csa(4),= =20 snd_gusc(4), and snd_sbc(4). Writing the man pages was no my todo list at= =20 one time. On Sunday 03 April 2005 03:49, faisal gillani wrote: > i configured Freebsd as my desktop, everything is > working fine , except sound , freebsd havent seemed to > pick up my sound card .. or its not configured , is > there any utility there to configure sound ? > > thanks > > > *=BA=A4., =B8=B8,.=A4=BA*=A8=A8=A8*=A4 Allah-hu-Akber*=BA=A4., =B8=B8,.= =A4=BA*=A8=A8*=A4 > God is the Greatest > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. > http://personals.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 15:22:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4891716A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:22:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA2543D49 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:22:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.21] (port=1466 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DI6vL-000OAG-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:22:03 +0400 Message-ID: <42500A1F.7080106@mail.ru> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:22:07 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Caley References: <424EEB21.1010109@mail.ru> <200504021423.28745.ringworm01@gmail.com> <424FAD11.5090701@mail.ru> <20050403152204.778ec85f@localhost> <87acof51ut.fsf@pele.r.caley.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <87acof51ut.fsf@pele.r.caley.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: "Michael C. Shultz" cc: Fabian Keil Subject: Re: Some kind of intranet update system for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:22:05 -0000 Richard Caley wrote: > In article <20050403152204.778ec85f@localhost>, Fabian Keil (fk) writes: > > > fk> If the kernels are the same, you can use the same build > fk> on every machine as well. > > If they aren't it works to set KERNCONF to the whole list on the build > machine > > KENRCONF="Macine1 Macine2 Machine3" > > It builds them all, but instals teh first one on this machine. Would it build all the modules three time, I wonder? Thanks, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 15:24:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF3D16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:24:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (r2g224.chello.upc.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E68543D49 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:24:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0AA231F87BED; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:24:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:24:24 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Sadashiv Kulthe Message-ID: <20050403152424.GA90636@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Sadashiv Kulthe , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: webalizer package installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:24:30 -0000 # sadashiv.linux@gmail.com / 2005-04-03 19:13:04 +0530: > I am trying to install webalizer. I am newbie and I have tried a lot. > But it is giving me error .. Hello, please don't post to many lists at once. If in doubt, check the charters at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL > checking for main in -lpng... no > configure: error: png library not found... please install Png. > > checking for libgd.so... (cached) no > configure: error: gd library not found... please install gd. This is output of a configure script, how are you exactly installing webalizer? > 1) How to install gd and png libraries? Can you provide me url? How > to check they are installed or not? I'll answer a question of how to install webalizer instead. Either: pkg_add -r webalizer or: cd /usr/ports/www/webalizer && make install clean > 2) I also want to install a JAVA on freeBSD. What are the packages > requires, how to install them. I know pkg_add command. Will this help? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/java-tomcat/index.html Other documentation might be helpful, too: http://www.freebsd.org/docs.html > 3) How to check what packages are install on the system and how to > resolve dependacies. Documentation on the packaging system in FreeBSD can be found in the Handbook (file:///usr/share/doc/handbook/ or http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/), and in ports(7) and pages referenced from there. -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 15:25:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057AA16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:25:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC3743D58 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:25:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68AD960D6; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:25:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18281-06; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:25:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A281C60D4; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:25:32 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <42500AF0.7060901@makeworld.com> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:25:36 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050327) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: aj@siegel-tech.net References: <20050403094953.5269.qmail@web51110.mail.yahoo.com> <200504030919.05069.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> In-Reply-To: <200504030919.05069.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sound problem ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:25:38 -0000 Aaron Siegel wrote: > Faisal Gillani > > I do not like the handbook instructions, read my whining bellow. I would > recommend following these procedures for configuring your sound card. The > instruction in this email are very similar to the handbooks. Do not try to > figure out what driver you sound card using form the Hardware Notes go > directly to the /boot/loader.conf. > > 1 If you have added the any sound devices to you kernel configuration remove > remove them. Remove the lines > device sound > device snd_* > You may or my not have this in your kernel. If you have not added the sound > driver to your kernel the skip to the next step. > > 2 You can easily look all the available sound drivers in > the /boot/loader.conf. (the following list is from 5.3-STABLE, it may not > match the drivers on your system) : > sound_load="YES" # Digital sound subsystem > snd_ad1816_load="NO" # ad1816 > snd_als4000_load="NO" # als4000 > snd_cmi_load="NO" # cmi > snd_cs4281_load="NO" # cs4281 > snd_csa_load="NO" # csa > snd_ds1_load="NO" # ds1 > snd_emu10k1_load="NO" # Creative Sound Blaster Live > snd_es137x_load="NO" # es137x > snd_ess_load="NO" # ess > snd_fm801_load="NO" # fm801 > snd_ich_load="NO" # Intel ICH > snd_maestro_load="NO" # Maestro > snd_maestro3_load="NO" # Maestro3 > snd_mss_load="NO" # Mss > snd_neomagic_load="NO" # Neomagic > snd_sb16_load="NO" # Sound Blaster 16 > snd_sb8_load="NO" # Sound Blaster Pro > snd_sbc_load="NO" # Sbc > snd_solo_load="NO" # Solo > snd_t4dwave_load="NO" # t4dwave > snd_via8233_load="NO" # via8233 > snd_via82c686_load="NO" # via82c686 > snd_vibes_load="NO" # vibes > snd_driver_load="NO" # All sound drivers While most of what you say is correct, and I have opted to use loader.conf for sound, this file is actually in /boot/defaults/loader.conf By default, /boot/loader.conf is either non-existant, or has very little in it. Telling the OP to look in /boot/loader.conf for the lines above will confuse him/her. In general, /boot/defaults/loader.conf is a great place to start. Much like /etc/defaults - these are set as the system defaults. putting the lines you want in /boot/loader.conf over rides the system defaults. Also worth noting (as with /etc/defaults) the user ought to get into the habit of editing the proper files instead of the system default files. -- Best regards, Chris Nothing is ever so bad it can't be made worse by firing the coach. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 15:30:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B36616A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:30:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D550B43D2D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:30:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.150?) (mjeays2551@24.114.152.139 with plain) by smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2005 15:30:09 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1112542205.20536.7.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:30:05 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Repairing an inconsistent system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:30:10 -0000 I made a mess of my 5.3 installation. I cvsupped the ports tree, and then tried to get the gtk interface to Ruby to work, and reinstalled the port for gtk20. Firefox and Evolution then stopped working, complaining about missing libraries such as libgtk-x11-2.0.so.400 being absent - they have been replaced by ..so.600. I tried doing ln -s ...600 ... 400, and the result was even worse; the applications ran, but all the text was scrambled. So I copied the original libraries over from another machine, and things SEEM back to normal. But I now have a machine that has libraries that don't match the ports tree. How should I get myself out of this self-inflicted mess? Re-install gtk20, followed by all the applications that depend on it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 15:36:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5667216A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:36:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FF143D2D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:36:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E8660D6; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:36:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18278-10; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:36:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927A760D4; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:36:06 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <42500D69.7000309@makeworld.com> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:36:09 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050327) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Jeays References: <1112542205.20536.7.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> In-Reply-To: <1112542205.20536.7.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Repairing an inconsistent system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:36:11 -0000 Mike Jeays wrote: > I made a mess of my 5.3 installation. I cvsupped the ports tree, and > then tried to get the gtk interface to Ruby to work, and reinstalled the > port for gtk20. Firefox and Evolution then stopped working, complaining > about missing libraries such as libgtk-x11-2.0.so.400 being absent - > they have been replaced by ..so.600. > > I tried doing ln -s ...600 ... 400, and the result was even worse; the > applications ran, but all the text was scrambled. So I copied the > original libraries over from another machine, and things SEEM back to > normal. But I now have a machine that has libraries that don't match > the ports tree. > > How should I get myself out of this self-inflicted mess? Re-install > gtk20, followed by all the applications that depend on it? As a rule of thumb, after cvsuping the ports tree, BEFORE you run portugrade/portmanager - READ /usr/ports/UPDATING. This also applies to the src tree. The reading of /usr/src/UPDATING should be second nature by now. These files give you a heads up on things that have changed/added/removed and give you clues on how to handle issues (should they exist). Many helpful scripts can be created to do what's needed within that file. -- Best regards, Chris If you're early, it'll be cancelled. If you knock yourself out to be on time, you will have to wait. If you're late, you will be too late. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 15:36:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34E216A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:36:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54007.mail.yahoo.com (web54007.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4285043D3F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:36:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 44111 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Apr 2005 15:36:38 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=Z4OMgS6Jq8CrFUwfuJiLIh64/cqmfnmju51G5cLlfoHjo6Khua05u1OE2e66nx4v1wxs6trgi/gtIYoaw05X8tT4QAT7/IRybBjXq8OD30FzKCMEIGUJXIUa0EEv9qK5AddGZRgdC2EohOVg91MQ5WkeKZ8LoK66jTS7ddfbncw= ; Message-ID: <20050403153638.44109.qmail@web54007.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [147.47.254.184] by web54007.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:36:38 PDT Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:36:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Rob To: emanuel.strobl@gmx.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD server behind router-NAT; how to configure sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:36:39 -0000 Emanuel Strobl wrote:\> > If you don't have /etc/mail/yourhostname.domain.mc > then you should cd to /etc/mail and type "make", > after you edited the file "make all install restart" Thanks for your help. I generated the files with this make command, and all just worked out of the box. I can send email, without needing to tell sendmail about my hostname. So far so good. However, next what I need, is using another port for sending emails out. I have googled and read the sendmail FAQs, but I am completely at a loss here. There is a FAQ, that explains: If you want all outgoing SMTP connections to use port 2525, you can use this in your .mc file: define(`RELAY_MAILER_ARGS', `TCP $h 2525') define(`ESMTP_MAILER_ARGS', `TCP $h 2525') I have put this in my hostname.mc file, but to no avail. I'm probably not familiar enough with sendmail way of doing things. But then this is such a simple thing, that it should be easy. I suppose that with "netstat -a", there should be a line with port 2525, if above works. But that is not there. Do you have any suggestions how to solve this? Thanks, Rob. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 16:25:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A4516A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:25:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (flb.schmalzbauer.de [62.245.232.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85A043D2F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:25:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from harry@schmalzbauer.de) Received: from korso.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de ([172.21.2.3]) by flb.schmalzbauer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j33GPmqa086930; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:25:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from harry@schmalzbauer.de) Received: from cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de (unknown [172.21.1.254]) by korso.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D001C13B; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:25:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cale (localhost [127.0.0.1])j33GPt52026425; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:25:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from harry@schmalzbauer.de) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by cale (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j33GPrgK026424; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:25:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from harry@schmalzbauer.de) X-Authentication-Warning: cale: harry set sender to harry@schmalzbauer.de using -f From: Harald Schmalzbauer To: Rob Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:25:46 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050403153638.44109.qmail@web54007.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050403153638.44109.qmail@web54007.mail.yahoo.com> X-Birthday: 10/06/72 X-CelPhone: +49 173 9967781 X-Tel: +49 89 18947781 X-Country: Germany X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-OS: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart37110823.t2BR0Y0EIJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504031825.53830@harrymail> cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD server behind router-NAT; how to configure sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:25:51 -0000 --nextPart37110823.t2BR0Y0EIJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Sonntag, 3. April 2005 17:36 schrieb Rob: > Emanuel Strobl wrote:\> > > > If you don't have /etc/mail/yourhostname.domain.mc > > then you should cd to /etc/mail and type "make", > > after you edited the file "make all install restart" > > Thanks for your help. I generated the files with this > make command, and all just worked out of the box. > I can send email, without needing to tell sendmail > about my hostname. So far so good. > > However, next what I need, is using another port for > sending emails out. I have googled and read the > sendmail FAQs, but I am completely at a loss here. > > There is a FAQ, that explains: > > If you want all outgoing SMTP connections to use > port 2525, you can use this in your .mc file: > > define(`RELAY_MAILER_ARGS', `TCP $h 2525') > define(`ESMTP_MAILER_ARGS', `TCP $h 2525') > > I have put this in my hostname.mc file, but to no > avail. I'm probably not familiar enough with sendmail > way of doing things. But then this is such a simple > thing, that it should be easy. > > I suppose that with "netstat -a", there should be > a line with port 2525, if above works. But that is > not there. I'm not sure if I understand your problem correctly, but what you did with= =20 these defines is that sendmail contacts every other system at port 2525=20 insetad of 25, it's not listening on 2525, hence you can't see a tcp/2525=20 with netstat -a. But I think it should do what you want, if I understand your description=20 right. If you want sendmail to listen at a custom port these defines are=20 wrong. I don't have them in my mind right now, I'm sure you'll find the M4= =20 defines at the sendmail FAQ, tell me if I can help. =2DHarry > > Do you have any suggestions how to solve this? > > Thanks, > Rob. > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com --nextPart37110823.t2BR0Y0EIJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCUBkRBylq0S4AzzwRAoU3AJ45QCoVl248yGj48BU+CbM8M3bFGACdEcQN FTWwVeaNAdpjZ3sCPSrnLkI= =nu3K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart37110823.t2BR0Y0EIJ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 16:27:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC8D16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:27:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF2C43D2F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:27:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so993715rng for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:27:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=hPnkF/sskf8Y94vTCDO4hAO0ZTlIiUobMvDZ80l2yMY1Bs27PoPsoE63IKNkzyY1Ni3biZFqezmBAU1IFPQ3o3lHFAhBwuN7gUQbQ6Tu5ylWU1Oun3t8vIe0rEcgxDp6yStWJzj9Ab8I34YPnJNeFH8mr1S4qArnu1GqDww+42I= Received: by 10.38.67.50 with SMTP id p50mr4509133rna; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:27:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:27:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:27:19 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: racerx@makeworld.com In-Reply-To: <424FED69.2030604@makeworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <424FED69.2030604@makeworld.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:27:20 -0000 On Apr 3, 2005 3:19 PM, Chris wrote: > Gert Cuykens wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2005 7:22 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > >>On Mar 31, 2005 3:34 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > >> > >>>Is boot0 a bootmanager ? > >>> > >> > >>I booted cd2 went into fixit mode did > >> > >>mount /dev/ad1 /mnt > >>cd /mnt/boot > >>fdisk -B -b /dev/ad1 boot0 > >> > >>fdisk ask me to write boot record i said yes > >>fdisk ask me to write partition table i said no > >> > >>but i still dont have my freebsd bootmanager back and windows get loaded :( > >>what did i do wrong ? > >> > > > > > > i did it again but i answert 2 times yes now > > i have a boot manager this time but only f1 (windows) works when i > > press f2 nothing happens ? > > I believe the handbook covers dual booting. Please consider reading it a > few times - as I mentioned before, the Handbook will answer most of your > questions. > > In addition, search this list for "other" methods of doing dual boots > with Windows. It's been covered many times. > > -- > Best regards, > Chris > > Real programmers can do octal, hexadecimal and > binary math in their heads. > The manual says sysinstall menu... boot manager... done I already did that and it works fine but i want to learn how to do it in fixit mode with fdisk -B b /dev/ad1 /mnt/boot/boot0 Windows is booting fine when i did that but freebsd doesnt boot what did i forget to do ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 16:42:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B5816A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:42:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (235.178.186.195.cust.bluewin.ch [195.186.178.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F5943D2D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:42:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j33GkJI7050229; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:46:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: (from martin@localhost) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j33GkJqO050224; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:46:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from martin) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:46:19 +0200 From: Martin Schweizer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050403164619.GQ82075@saturn.pcs.ms> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vJnATpogyuudK3Na" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH, CH-8608 Bubikon, Switzerland X-PGP-Key: http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc X-Fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239 Subject: VPN with setkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Schweizer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:42:24 -0000 --vJnATpogyuudK3Na Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello I've been run in troubles with setkey. My goal is to etablish a vpn connect= ion=20 with setkey/racoon to an vpn box from ZyXEL (Prestige 600series). My setup = is: notebook ---> FreeBSD gateway/firewall ---> Internet -----> ZyXEL Notebook: 192.168.50.55 FreeBSD gatewy/firewall: 192.168.50.1 ZyXEL: host.abc.net (internal net: 192.168.1.0/24) I can ping ZyXEL make vpn connections with a Windows client without problem= s.=20 I config the ipsec.conf with these options: spdadd -n 192.168.50.0/24 192.168.1.0/24 ipencap -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/19= 2.168.50.55-host.abc.net/require; spdadd 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.50.0/24 ipencap -P in ipsec esp/tunnel/host.a= bc.net-192.168.50.55/require; and this I get back from setkey: notebook# setkey -f ipsec.conf libipsec: invalid IP address while parsing "host.abc.net" line 1: hostname nor servname provided, or not known at [ out ipsec esp/tun= nel/192.168.50.55-host.abc.net/require parse failed, line 1. What I'm doing wrong? --=20 Regards Martin Schweizer PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH; Bannholzstrasse 6; CH-8608 Bubikon Tel. +41 55 243 30 00; Fax: +41 55 243 33 22; http://www.pc-service.ch; public key : http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc;=20 fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239; --vJnATpogyuudK3Na Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUB3bwa4WkdMP0jkRAmFiAKDt86pkxBvA/jL7ogLSvUwYEgRJ7wCeIMMU wcI6rk4espqYjk45bHgCpIs= =nfZu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vJnATpogyuudK3Na-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 16:56:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC1F16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:56:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6847E43D1D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:56:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DI8MO-00069Y-0C for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:54:04 +0200 Received: from pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net ([68.83.169.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:54:03 +0200 Received: from apeiron+usenet by pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:54:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christopher Nehren Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Organization: /usr/bin/false Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <20050403094953.5269.qmail@web51110.mail.yahoo.com> <200504030919.05069.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: Sound problem ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:56:04 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-04-03, Aaron Siegel scribbled these curious markings: > My whining attached bellow [snipped] Then fix it. Best Regards, Christopher Nehren -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUCABk/lo7zvzJioRAv3cAKCNMRWeU/ifdMwA8awajy912RhSqQCfaZIr J4MVUqriW+ze0XGdDEVJbUo= =bf3y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson If you ask the wrong questions, you get answers like "42" and "God". Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 17:02:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF0716A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:02:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E3743D45 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:02:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so997167rng for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:02:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=njyF7LO+N4dKdNOf/JUuBh3rd9EYrkbmb4P8hge4u6iAaWcpKZc/4uADCNGaoaacJ08U9gEJEcGdNWlbsPfHXAijzbnpvmwv+XzG47vN7nD//tTRCNXwOdjdPJOrdZ4xuRQsVA2vyJG/EVvisosp3P5vjgC8CXQlmSFYe67YbdI= Received: by 10.38.160.52 with SMTP id i52mr4433143rne; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:02:58 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: racerx@makeworld.com In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <424FED69.2030604@makeworld.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:02:59 -0000 On Apr 3, 2005 6:27 PM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Apr 3, 2005 3:19 PM, Chris wrote: > > Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > On Apr 3, 2005 7:22 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > > > >>On Mar 31, 2005 3:34 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > >> > > >>>Is boot0 a bootmanager ? > > >>> > > >> > > >>I booted cd2 went into fixit mode did > > >> > > >>mount /dev/ad1 /mnt > > >>cd /mnt/boot > > >>fdisk -B -b /dev/ad1 boot0 > > >> > > >>fdisk ask me to write boot record i said yes > > >>fdisk ask me to write partition table i said no > > >> > > >>but i still dont have my freebsd bootmanager back and windows get loaded :( > > >>what did i do wrong ? > > >> > > > > > > > > > i did it again but i answert 2 times yes now > > > i have a boot manager this time but only f1 (windows) works when i > > > press f2 nothing happens ? > > > > I believe the handbook covers dual booting. Please consider reading it a > > few times - as I mentioned before, the Handbook will answer most of your > > questions. > > > > In addition, search this list for "other" methods of doing dual boots > > with Windows. It's been covered many times. > > > > The manual says sysinstall menu... boot manager... done I already did > that and it works fine but i want to learn how to do it in fixit mode > with fdisk -B b /dev/ad1 /mnt/boot/boot0 > > Windows is booting fine when i did that but freebsd doesnt boot what > did i forget to do ? > I tryed disklabel -B /dev/ad1s2 it tels me partition a b c d: offset past unit and partition c doesnt start at 0 ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 17:08:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEE916A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:08:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out-mx1.crosswinds.net (out-mx1.crosswinds.net [216.18.117.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6133C43D45 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:08:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teilhk@crosswinds.net) Received: from member-mx1.crosswinds.net (member-mx1.crosswinds.net [216.18.117.43]) by out-mx1.crosswinds.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A906D2B64C for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:08:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fortunato (unknown [201.137.84.32]) by member-mx1.crosswinds.net (Postfix) with SMTP id CAC7A817CF for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:07:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <003101c5386f$af071750$230110ac@fortunato> From: "Teilhard Knight" To: "FreeBSD" Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:07:56 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Subject: Boot manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:08:07 -0000 Could you recommend a good boot manager, please? I mean, to boot several OSs, but not relying on Lilo. Not Xosl, because it doesn't work together with a Drive Overlay. Teilhard. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 17:19:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5AA16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:19:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47C3243D2D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:19:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Apr 2005 17:19:07 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO [172.21.1.254]) [62.245.232.135] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 03 Apr 2005 19:19:07 +0200 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:19:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <003101c5386f$af071750$230110ac@fortunato> In-Reply-To: <003101c5386f$af071750$230110ac@fortunato> X-Birthday: 10/06/72 X-CelPhone: +49 173 9967781 X-Tel: +49 89 18947781 X-Country: Germany X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-OS: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart370875556.WGnjsjZyLV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504031919.14264@harrymail> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: Teilhard Knight Subject: Re: Boot manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:19:10 -0000 --nextPart370875556.WGnjsjZyLV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Sonntag, 3. April 2005 19:07 schrieb Teilhard Knight: > Could you recommend a good boot manager, please? I mean, to boot several > OSs, but not relying on Lilo. Not Xosl, because it doesn't work together > with a Drive Overlay. Yes, I can strongly recommend gag. Very powerfull, yet very simple to use, = you=20 even needn't install it. http://gag.sourceforge.net/ =2DHarry > > Teilhard. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --nextPart370875556.WGnjsjZyLV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCUCWSBylq0S4AzzwRAqLRAJ0YpjgSg+SyybDR7toK4/2CXeUCPwCfX+aq oteoYqLjf/SrvqdpdnZWl5I= =88ZC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart370875556.WGnjsjZyLV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 17:31:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DDE16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:31:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from metroid.prideindesign.com (netblock-66-159-250-220.dslextreme.com [66.159.250.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A844843D45 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:31:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lewis@prideindesign.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by metroid.prideindesign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F17AC860; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from metroid.prideindesign.com ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 34983-06; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:32:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (netblock-66-159-250-221.dslextreme.com [66.159.250.221]) by metroid.prideindesign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3E4AC822; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:32:39 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913 Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:31:06 -0700 From: Joshua Lewis To: Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Which mail server is the best for me? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:31:22 -0000 Gosh could you have picked a harder question? That is like saying Blondes, Brunets or Red Heads? You will have to read up about several MTA=B9s and figure out what suites you= r needs. It will take a good few hours of reading and if you are anything lik= e me with a wife job and three kids then time is precious. So to try and help you get on your way don=B9t use sendmail. I am partial to Postfix although with that said I have never used anything else. I did several days worth of reading and Postfix was my choice due to it=B9s ease of use, flexibility and security. Ease of Use: If you are only receiving e-mail for FQDN of your box (/etc/rc.conf) then right after you have finished installing Postfix you are ready to go. It uses sensible defaults and is a breeze to work with. At that point you will be using local system accounts and MBOX format. You ought to read abou= t the benefits and drawbacks or both to decide if that is really what you want. MBOX is easy enough to change however changing your logins to use something other then the local /etc/masster.passwd database takes some extr= a finagling. Again the how toos are a great help. Flexibility=20 Now with that said I am hosting e-mail for several of my web customers. So I wanted to set up a MySQL back end to manage the domains instead of using text files. Security I also wanted to add additional security and installed TLS and SASL. As well as quota=B9s so my users don=B9t suck up all my disk space. So I took it t= o the next level and it took quite a bit more time to setup. So if you want a MTA that will be a breeze to setup but can have the flexibility to use more features you can shake a stick at while maintaining the KISS process (Keep it simple stupid). Then Postfix is a good choice. There are A LOT of how too=B9s on postfix out on the net. Take a look at the documentation on the postfix website postfix.org. The how too=B9s and the postfix documentation are separate pages on their site. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 17:32:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E2816A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:32:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out-mx1.crosswinds.net (out-mx1.crosswinds.net [216.18.117.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6319D43D45 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:32:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teilhk@crosswinds.net) Received: from member-mx1.crosswinds.net (member-mx1.crosswinds.net [216.18.117.43]) by out-mx1.crosswinds.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031FF2BAE1; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:32:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fortunato (unknown [201.137.84.32]) by member-mx1.crosswinds.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A234481142; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:32:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <007701c53873$0bbcbc40$230110ac@fortunato> From: "Teilhard Knight" To: "FreeBSD" , "Emanuel Strobl" References: <003101c5386f$af071750$230110ac@fortunato> <200504031919.14264@harrymail> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:32:00 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Subject: Re: Boot manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:32:03 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Emanuel Strobl" To: Cc: "Teilhard Knight" Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:19 AM Subject: Re: Boot manager Thank you. I have had a look at it, and I would prefer a boot manager which can be installed in a dedicated partition the way Xosl can be installed. Teilhard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 17:36:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1043D16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:36:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA76643D1D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:36:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DI8zB-00016S-Cg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:34:09 +0200 Received: from pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net ([68.83.169.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:34:09 +0200 Received: from apeiron+usenet by pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:34:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christopher Nehren Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Organization: /usr/bin/false Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <003101c5386f$af071750$230110ac@fortunato> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: Boot manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:36:32 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-04-03, Teilhard Knight scribbled these curious markings: > Could you recommend a good boot manager, please? I mean, to boot several > OSs, but not relying on Lilo. Not Xosl, because it doesn't work together > with a Drive Overlay. What's wrong with FreeBSD's boot manager? Best Regards, Christopher Nehren -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUCllk/lo7zvzJioRArE5AKCjYRUK5mSjbRYp0Bh5wH+GrjLAFgCdHCac 1fL0g361cyYbHJWcBka2HFA= =2Hd+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson If you ask the wrong questions, you get answers like "42" and "God". Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 17:51:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D0216A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:51:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617FC43D45 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:51:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rackleff@adelphia.net) Received: from [192.168.0.101] (really [67.23.120.136]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with ESMTP id <20050403175146.WVXQ5402.mta11.adelphia.net@[192.168.0.101]> for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:51:46 -0400 Message-ID: <42502D63.3040409@adelphia.net> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:52:35 -0400 From: Keith Rackleff User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Unable to find device node for /dev/ad0s1b in /dev! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:51:47 -0000 I had this same type problem. It appears that FreeBSD and the BIOS did not select the proper geometry for the disk. I tried a different disk on the same system, and I was able to install. Knopptix reported a different geometry than FreeBSD, so I tried setting the geometry to match what Knopptix reported, but, the installation graphical fdisk told me the Knopptix geometry was "unrealistic", and set it back to the BIOS geometry. I installed the system on a different drive, and then used the command line fdisk command to partition the disk with the Knopptix geometry. I was then able to set the labels and mount the errant drive. Keith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 17:54:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA43C16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:54:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326FF43D2D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:54:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1002304rng for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:54:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UDeNkkKuZB/d9GlCY5KGWR+kwEKfCjHMbgMsFWn5KmbQ5mygQlch5MFyscdfQ/rTuei+HIslbaHoRE0+gWnqde1W+2vZzk+JLbl3qvVeWvLFPLRrZ9o0v4LLiJoWYOcZD3Wo7cuofg1UgQHmGSidEsW/3lJhHG3dCANU9sUv6es= Received: by 10.38.86.68 with SMTP id j68mr4573864rnb; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:54:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:54:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:54:42 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 1001:1001::0:0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:54:45 -0000 what does 1001:1001::0:0 in vipw mean ? i thought 1001 is the user id ? And 0 the x screen : 0 the x display ? Why are there 2 times 1001 written ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 17:57:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38CE16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:57:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2836243D41 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:57:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j33Hvt1C088663; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:57:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:57:55 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Gert Cuykens Message-ID: <20050403175755.GH83737@dan.emsphone.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 1001:1001::0:0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:57:56 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 03), Gert Cuykens said: > what does 1001:1001::0:0 in vipw mean ? > > i thought 1001 is the user id ? And 0 the x screen : 0 the x display? > Why are there 2 times 1001 written ? The passwd manpage explains it (man 5 passwd). The first two numbers are the uid and primary gid, the next empty field is the login class (see the login.conf manpage), and the next two fields are the password and account expiry times (which are currently unused). -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 18:06:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C6516A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:06:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neptune.atopia.net (neptune.atopia.net [209.128.231.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD6443D31 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:06:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (pcp173257pcs.plsntv01.nj.comcast.net [68.46.70.16]) by neptune.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5314340B4; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:06:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <425030A0.4000809@atopia.net> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:06:24 -0400 From: Matt Juszczak User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041129) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RXJpayBOw7hyZ2FhcmQ=?= References: <424F8B94.7050006@atopia.net> <424FCDD3.6040507@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <424FCDD3.6040507@locolomo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFILTER and NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:06:26 -0000 Problem is that I need to firewall the client. I dont have access to the nfs server... only the client. Your configuration info showed me making changes on the server. is there a way to make the client work ok? -Matt Erik Nørgaard wrote: > Matt Juszczak wrote: > >> Howdy, >> >> Trying to get IPFILTER and NFS working. A google search didn't show >> much about my specific issue. With ipfilter working, nfs initially >> works, until someone tries to login. Then it stops working. With my >> firewall down on the NFS-CLIENT machine, it works fine. Any ideas? >> >> It appears to be an issue with random ports.... > > > It is, NFS is an RPC service where the RPC deamon is requested to for > info on which port mountd binds to. I wrote an howto for diskless > clients, www.daemonsecurity.com/pxe/ - here's what to do: > > Enable nfs in /etc/rc.conf: > > rpcbind_enable="YES" # Run the portmapper service (YES/NO). > nfs_server_enable="YES" # This host is an NFS server (or NO). > mountd_enable="YES" # Run mountd (or NO). > mountd_flags="-r -p 59" # Force mountd to bind on port 59 > > As a minimum you need to enable rpcbind, nfsserver and mountd. lockd > and statd provides file locking and status monitoring. By default, > when mountd starts it binds to some arbitrary port, and rpc is used to > discover which, making it imposible to firewall. With option '-p' > mountd can be forced to bind to a specific port. Port 59 is assigned > to "any private file service" (see /etc/services). > > This limits the number of ports relevant to 59, 111 and 2049. You > can't force lockd and statd to bind to specific ports (they are alos > RPC services) and AFAIK you can't have disk quotas work correctly > because of this. > > AFAIK NFS4 should address these problems, but the NFS4 server is still > experimental. > > Till then, RPC is a security nightmare. > > Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 18:18:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C938816A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:18:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E78C43D48 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:18:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1004699rng for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:18:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Fzqpej/PdGY45UYLawc2LmZjMn2hcRVGT9l+03+VlxKA+KBI3h0I4BsGxIlSZpYQ7Hsx4s3oktBoPkYS3LgQLx6QNPuLNiGO7p922IpS7lfD1Cz2qAABb8MGDMflZPhntsvVd2E7udSZFp1ZgJjfeccLjrd3UovCZ+xRrL+tdYA= Received: by 10.38.12.35 with SMTP id 35mr4543511rnl; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:18:47 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050403175755.GH83737@dan.emsphone.com> Subject: Re: 1001:1001::0:0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:18:48 -0000 On Apr 3, 2005 8:18 PM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Apr 3, 2005 7:57 PM, Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (Apr 03), Gert Cuykens said: > > > what does 1001:1001::0:0 in vipw mean ? > > > > > > i thought 1001 is the user id ? And 0 the x screen : 0 the x display? > > > Why are there 2 times 1001 written ? > > > > The passwd manpage explains it (man 5 passwd). The first two numbers > > are the uid and primary gid, the next empty field is the login class > > (see the login.conf manpage), and the next two fields are the password > > and account expiry times (which are currently unused). > > thx so its user id : group id : login class : begin date : end date From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 18:22:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1393716A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:22:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF92A43D45 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:22:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1005006rng for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:22:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=pSoEWFn3Q7s27XXuUdWgLISc6B5gNkxkSUQFrcVqIBnYc843EjbARa4lr5Msa/rp0FRJIKBgPINrZwyBBiinJB9TygABNdQrSUDJRsHwonA1ck3V3YKLH/mc5uFaCWBsMzg6VuKN2qzJ83FD1hOsYhfV+saP5ER/GwdycjMoXF4= Received: by 10.38.6.79 with SMTP id 79mr1167565rnf; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:22:09 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050403175755.GH83737@dan.emsphone.com> Subject: Re: 1001:1001::0:0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:22:11 -0000 Alrighdy i found the honny jar :) http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/users-introduction.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 18:26:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0FC16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:26:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942F443D3F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:26:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1005443rng for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:26:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=LcKvrJGR62KwczdSI6yT0cJZOIk10y05344ikVgbUi12fpnibvtoNVTcvWnOSOWNcIsyPyJwogmi1bpWor7HqrChTYeRUK8fR/E9lp7HMbE1jRlYzi13/68pNCMG9rtLhenDeTbb1Ob1n0vWMKR0T3DvAp5rEUI0H3WHihjHSYw= Received: by 10.38.13.39 with SMTP id 39mr4549410rnm; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:26:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:26:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:26:47 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050403182501.GI83737@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050403175755.GH83737@dan.emsphone.com> <20050403182501.GI83737@dan.emsphone.com> Subject: Re: 1001:1001::0:0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:26:48 -0000 On Apr 3, 2005 8:25 PM, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Apr 03), Gert Cuykens said: > > On Apr 3, 2005 7:57 PM, Dan Nelson wrote: > > > In the last episode (Apr 03), Gert Cuykens said: > > > > what does 1001:1001::0:0 in vipw mean ? > > > > > > > > i thought 1001 is the user id ? And 0 the x screen : 0 the x > > > > display? Why are there 2 times 1001 written ? > > > > > > The passwd manpage explains it (man 5 passwd). The first two > > > numbers are the uid and primary gid, the next empty field is the > > > login class (see the login.conf manpage), and the next two fields > > > are the password and account expiry times (which are currently > > > unused). > > > > > > > thx so its > > > > user id : group id : login class : begin date : end date > > Actually: > > user id : group id : login class : password expire date : account expire date > doh! :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 18:36:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2F316A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:36:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A1F43D1F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:36:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1006394rng for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:36:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=d6kPyBeYwY8Ln0vymUHWewmw3C3MlW/De0rNjNv4LZ07H4iCPn9LpUA20N/vODIIct2ahnG4OF0jQqRBg3n1gx4MLOlljcVwWSHah4CQilv+zmJ3CguD+kNGPkpbvOm0KtxKjlwiPaRtcTNp/eq9al6/v+yYy67rVN5aUT0E5sg= Received: by 10.38.12.35 with SMTP id 35mr4553692rnl; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:36:53 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: Christopher Nehren In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <003101c5386f$af071750$230110ac@fortunato> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:36:54 -0000 On Apr 3, 2005 7:33 PM, Christopher Nehren wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2005-04-03, Teilhard Knight scribbled these > curious markings: > > Could you recommend a good boot manager, please? I mean, to boot several > > OSs, but not relying on Lilo. Not Xosl, because it doesn't work together > > with a Drive Overlay. > > What's wrong with FreeBSD's boot manager? > It doesnt have colors It doesnt look pretty It writes ?? instead of windows Nobody knows how it works for example how to install it witout sysinstall :P look a birdy zwoef (running away) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 18:47:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430FD16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:47:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E00A43D55 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:47:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Apr 2005 18:47:36 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de) [62.245.232.135] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 03 Apr 2005 20:47:36 +0200 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Gert Cuykens Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:47:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <003101c5386f$af071750$230110ac@fortunato> In-Reply-To: X-Birthday: 10/06/72 X-CelPhone: +49 173 9967781 X-Tel: +49 89 18947781 X-Country: Germany X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-OS: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart79494119.NyxhZxQjQr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504032047.42533@harrymail> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: Christopher Nehren Subject: Re: Boot manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:47:38 -0000 --nextPart79494119.NyxhZxQjQr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Sonntag, 3. April 2005 20:36 schrieb Gert Cuykens: > On Apr 3, 2005 7:33 PM, Christopher Nehren > > wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 2005-04-03, Teilhard Knight scribbled these > > > > curious markings: > > > Could you recommend a good boot manager, please? I mean, to boot > > > several OSs, but not relying on Lilo. Not Xosl, because it doesn't wo= rk > > > together with a Drive Overlay. > > > > What's wrong with FreeBSD's boot manager? > > It doesnt have colors > It doesnt look pretty > It writes ?? instead of windows > Nobody knows how it works for example how to install it witout sysinstall > :P The latter is not true, the manpage very clearly points to boot0cfg, a very= =20 convinient tool and there's probably nothing out there which describes the= =20 booting stages on i386 better than the boot(8) manpage. If you don't like it it's another thing but you should read the excelent st= uff=20 people are writing for you! =2DHarry > > look a birdy zwoef (running away) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --nextPart79494119.NyxhZxQjQr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCUDpOBylq0S4AzzwRAqtPAJ44AOTvXh472sYZU2W8h+fp0jUgNwCdG9Io yHVKocztEXCCc2/Bb0530WE= =QCcM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart79494119.NyxhZxQjQr-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 18:48:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B20416A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:48:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BBF43D2F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:48:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.0.32] (charm.daemonsecurity.com [192.168.0.32]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963CAFE642; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:48:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42503A76.20309@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:48:22 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?RXJpayBOw7hyZ2FhcmQ=?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050314 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, en-gb, da, fr, de, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Juszczak References: <424F8B94.7050006@atopia.net> <424FCDD3.6040507@locolomo.org> <425030A0.4000809@atopia.net> In-Reply-To: <425030A0.4000809@atopia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFILTER and NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:48:26 -0000 Matt Juszczak wrote: > I dont have access to the nfs server... only the client. Your > configuration info showed me making changes on the server. is there a > way to make the client work ok? Just let your client connect to any port on the server - keep state so you can block incoming connections: pass out quick on proto tcp from /32 \ to /32 flags S keep state pass out quick on proto udp from /32 \ to /32 keep state Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 18:50:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2161116A4CE; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:50:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CE843D48; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:50:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050403185022.YXRI4618.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:50:22 -0400 From: To: "Giorgos Keramidas" , "Randy Pratt" Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:50:20 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050403094323.GB75971@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: dot.icabod@gmail.com Subject: RE: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:50:24 -0000 YES there is something major wrong with the official handbook. The majority of the content is written like the reader already has good understanding of how FreeBSD works. It is not detailed enough for someone who has no previous experience with Unix like operating systems. The referenced Install guide gives clear step by step instructions. It only uses the sysinstall process to lay down the default operating system from cdrom. Then step by step instruction on which /etc conf files need to be edited and with what data needs to be added and why. It completes side steps the many un-documented sysinstall options as functions only necessary for advanced users. If you were current on the content of the handbook you will see that the handbooks complete section on firewalls has been replaced with the complete firewall section from the Install guide we are talking about. AND if you had accessed the Install guide you would have see that it is available to everyone for download and viewing on their own PC. It is public domain and the FreeBSD-Doc group can incorporate it into the handbook or make it a separate install guide for beginners. The FreeBSD Install Guide is mirrored at the following sites. http://freebsd.easyasthat.co.uk/ http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php http://freebsd.packards-home.net/index.php www.a1poweruser.com http://freebsdinfo.org/ http://freebsd.a1poweruser.com:6088/ http://freebsd.95mb.com/ -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Giorgos Keramidas Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 5:43 AM To: Randy Pratt Cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; dot.icabod@gmail.com Subject: Re: question On 2005-04-03 00:11, Randy Pratt wrote: >On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:30:13 -0500 >"fbsd_user" wrote: >> Reinstall from scratch using cd install disk. Keep trying until you >> get it correct. That's how you learn FreeBSD. >> >> Follow instructions from this url >> http://freebsd.easyasthat.co.uk/ > > Is there something wrong with the installation instructions at: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install.ht ml > > I keep seeing you recommend that site (yours?) as the instructions to > follow. It's ok. There may be very good bits there (I haven't had a chance to read the entire document yet), so it's not very bad to suggest using it. If there are parts that we could include in the official FreeBSD doc/ tree, that would be great too. So, if anyone has used the aforementioned guide and found parts that are not covered by the official docs, please mail either me directly or the freebsd-doc list. > If there's something lacking in the official instructions, wouldn't it > be better to update those so they get a proper peer review? Agreed. Updating the official documentation, where it lacks, seems like a good thing. - Giorgos _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 18:53:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDD216A4CE; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:53:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8717D43D5C; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:53:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050403185355.HDJF7277.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:53:55 -0400 From: To: "Giorgos Keramidas" , "Randy Pratt" Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:53:54 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050403094323.GB75971@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: dot.icabod@gmail.com Subject: New Freebsd Install Guide Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:53:57 -0000 YES there is something major wrong with the official handbook. The majority of the content is written like the reader already has good understanding of how FreeBSD works. It is not detailed enough for someone who has no previous experience with Unix like operating systems. The referenced Install guide gives clear step by step instructions. It only uses the sysinstall process to lay down the default operating system from cdrom. Then step by step instruction on which /etc conf files need to be edited and with what data needs to be added and why. It completely side steps the many un-documented sysinstall options as functions only necessary for advanced users. If you were current on the content of the handbook you will see that the handbooks complete section on firewalls has been replaced with the complete firewall section from the Install guide we are talking about. AND if you had accessed the Install guide you would have see that it is available to everyone for download and viewing on their own PC. It is public domain and the FreeBSD-Doc group can incorporate it into the handbook or make it a separate install guide for beginners. The FreeBSD Install Guide is mirrored at the following sites. http://freebsd.easyasthat.co.uk/ http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php http://freebsd.packards-home.net/index.php www.a1poweruser.com http://freebsdinfo.org/ http://freebsd.a1poweruser.com:6088/ http://freebsd.95mb.com/ -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Giorgos Keramidas Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 5:43 AM To: Randy Pratt Cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; dot.icabod@gmail.com Subject: Re: question On 2005-04-03 00:11, Randy Pratt wrote: >On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:30:13 -0500 >"fbsd_user" wrote: >> Reinstall from scratch using cd install disk. Keep trying until you >> get it correct. That's how you learn FreeBSD. >> >> Follow instructions from this url >> http://freebsd.easyasthat.co.uk/ > > Is there something wrong with the installation instructions at: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install.ht ml > > I keep seeing you recommend that site (yours?) as the instructions to > follow. It's ok. There may be very good bits there (I haven't had a chance to read the entire document yet), so it's not very bad to suggest using it. If there are parts that we could include in the official FreeBSD doc/ tree, that would be great too. So, if anyone has used the aforementioned guide and found parts that are not covered by the official docs, please mail either me directly or the freebsd-doc list. > If there's something lacking in the official instructions, wouldn't it > be better to update those so they get a proper peer review? Agreed. Updating the official documentation, where it lacks, seems like a good thing. - Giorgos _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 19:10:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5000D16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:10:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADBA43D48 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:10:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DIAT0-0000bD-K8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:09:02 +0200 Received: from pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net ([68.83.169.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:09:02 +0200 Received: from apeiron+usenet by pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:09:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christopher Nehren Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Organization: /usr/bin/false Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <20050403094323.GB75971@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: New Freebsd Install Guide Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:10:59 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-04-03, scribbled these curious markings: > YES there is something major wrong with the official handbook. The > majority of the content is written like the reader already has good > understanding of how FreeBSD works. It is not detailed enough for > someone who has no previous experience with Unix like operating > systems. As others have pointed out to you, why not contribute to the official documentation, rather than making FreeBSD more like Linux with dozens of different (conflicting, and most often *all* wrong) sources of documentation? Best Regards, Christopher Nehren -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUD+ck/lo7zvzJioRAotJAJ4jHOTgdMgCXjeLUJADRnfiC2Nu2ACgpTm+ YF548plsIx4TjkmJg75Rtz0= =Ztuv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson If you ask the wrong questions, you get answers like "42" and "God". Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 19:12:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA4616A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:12:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DDB43D1D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:12:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DIAU2-0000fq-3x for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:10:06 +0200 Received: from pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net ([68.83.169.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:10:06 +0200 Received: from apeiron+usenet by pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:10:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christopher Nehren Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Organization: /usr/bin/false Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: <003101c5386f$af071750$230110ac@fortunato> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: Boot manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:12:07 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-04-03, Gert Cuykens scribbled these curious markings: > It doesnt have colors So? It's a boot manager, not a piece of artwork. > It doesnt look pretty Ditto. > It writes ?? instead of windows It prints ?? because it can't possibly imagine why you'd want to make that choice. :) > Nobody knows how it works for example how to install it witout sysinstall :P Someone else responded to this. Best Regards, Christopher Nehren -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUD9Mk/lo7zvzJioRAkDqAKCz+O+4FK3Arec7rUrgBuVkoZirOQCcCAwm NW8nY8mxtK7utOeUeqET7mU= =C8/6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson If you ask the wrong questions, you get answers like "42" and "God". Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 19:20:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171BA16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:20:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E78C43D45 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:20:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a132.otenet.gr [212.205.215.132]) j33JJ2IK002694; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:19:03 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j33JJmiB001324; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:19:48 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j33JJmMk001323; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:19:48 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:19:48 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: bob@a1poweruser.com Message-ID: <20050403191948.GB1115@gothmog.gr> References: <20050403094323.GB75971@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com cc: Randy Pratt cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: dot.icabod@gmail.com Subject: Re: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:20:03 -0000 On 2005-04-03 14:50, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > YES there is something major wrong with the official handbook. The > majority of the content is written like the reader already has good > understanding of how FreeBSD works. It is not detailed enough for > someone who has no previous experience with Unix like operating > systems. You're probably right. The people who write documentation are usually seasoned FreeBSD hackers, and what you say is often true. If you do have more specific suggestiongs, like: ``In chapter 2, section 3, the installation guide mentions partitions without an explanation of what a partition is. We could probably add this paragraph here [ Insert small paragraph of plain text or SGML ] and it would all look a lot better.'' I would be glad to see your posts in freebsd-doc or as problem reports submitted in Gnats. Since I *did* ask explicitly, you can definitely Cc: me too and keep bugging me until I commit the changes :-) > The referenced Install guide gives clear step by step instructions. I will definitely give it a look. I have already started reading it, but didn't get a chance to finish it tonight, due to other more urgent stuff. > It only uses the sysinstall process to lay down the default operating > system from cdrom. Then step by step instruction on which /etc conf > files need to be edited and with what data needs to be added and why. For a specific configuration, as far as I have seen. The Handbook should be more general. But we'll get a chance to discuss this once I finish reading the guide. > If you were current on the content of the handbook you will see that > the handbooks complete section on firewalls has been replaced with > the complete firewall section from the Install guide we are talking > about. I _am_ current on the firewall chapter. I also dislike some parts of it, but that's a different story. You may recall that I was the first who was opposed to the commit of this new section back when it was committed in Sep 2004, because I consider it lacking too much in the areas of completeness, correctness, and style of writing. My personal opinion doesn't matter though, since others have picked up the ball and fixed a zillion things. I am very grateful to people like Marc Fonvieille, Simon Nielsen, Tom Rhodes, Joehl Dahl, Brad Davis and others who have stepped up and worked on the "new" firewall chapter. > AND if you had accessed the Install guide you would have see that it > is available to everyone for download and viewing on their own PC. Please note that I have accessed the guide. I've already read a part of it, and making already progress towards having read it all. My offer to commit changes to the Handbook that incorporate stuff from your guide still stands, so apart from saying "my guide is better and holier than yours" you're always welcome to submit diffs and/or plain text changes for the Handbook chapter that explains the installation process. :-) Regards, Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 19:20:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B25416A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:20:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51109.mail.yahoo.com (web51109.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A19243D31 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:20:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fasi_74@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 36402 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Apr 2005 19:20:14 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=L90rtixbQuVD6f8k7+YVK4oFqd7bA96vzsUXcanVu5/pxHFQhHeXscwfFfIqadHUBIse5rcPY1qMOzWhDPikv+Z75jVLPwapP6amH0BqhwlYLGOQetSeb+32yvAzwGPtPqkA2+eNQgqVaEfuPkcoiZZ9T9dLBgz/jUjO3ZYuLVI= ; Message-ID: <20050403192014.36400.qmail@web51109.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.147.160.231] by web51109.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:20:14 PDT Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:20:14 -0700 (PDT) From: faisal gillani To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: 6667 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: HT still not working ... version 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:20:16 -0000 i have intel 2.8 ghz HT enabled system,which works on windows XP but not working with HT technology in freebsd i did compile freebsd kernal with smp support but still 2nd processor fails to start , here are the messages in the dmesg output. FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #1: Mon Apr 4 00:03:25 UTC 2005 admin@testserveir.clickonline:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/clickonlineosbeta1 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (2793.20-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf25 Stepping = 5 Features=0xbfebfbff Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 250802176 (239 MB) avail memory = 235687936 (224 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (splash_bmp, 0xc09db810, 0) error 2 ---------------------------------------------------- acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 cpu0: port 0x530-0x537 on acpi0 cpu1: port 0x530-0x537 on acpi0 cpu1: Failed to attach throttling P_CNT ---------------------------------------------------- acd1: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ Allah-hu-Akber*º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ God is the Greatest __________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 19:20:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCE916A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:20:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7279043D1D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:20:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050403192047.ACN4618.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:20:47 -0400 From: To: "Christopher Nehren" , Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:20:46 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: New Freebsd Install Guide Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:20:49 -0000 What you didn't read the complete content of the message. You just wanted to see this, your meaningless out of context mesg on the list. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Christopher Nehren Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 3:09 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Freebsd Install Guide Available -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-04-03, scribbled these curious markings: > YES there is something major wrong with the official handbook. The > majority of the content is written like the reader already has good > understanding of how FreeBSD works. It is not detailed enough for > someone who has no previous experience with Unix like operating > systems. As others have pointed out to you, why not contribute to the official documentation, rather than making FreeBSD more like Linux with dozens of different (conflicting, and most often *all* wrong) sources of documentation? Best Regards, Christopher Nehren -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUD+ck/lo7zvzJioRAotJAJ4jHOTgdMgCXjeLUJADRnfiC2Nu2ACgpTm+ YF548plsIx4TjkmJg75Rtz0= =Ztuv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson If you ask the wrong questions, you get answers like "42" and "God". Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 19:24:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38CF16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:24:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F08143D1F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:24:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1011073rng for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:24:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=MhamEJ1kIcZeSykc98RV9r9X+82kdo1lI9EIDYUajvLEKKVVh96TaR60MiSSFVm9nwl0FzNPq6kBNtnoGXnOIOjHniuDmV6wp/bjLL2ttrluRlD6gDsgiluAxwHXvoydeAB6A/+5nRxi4qvur89n/aDUgznDUF5osAtpw4vsGBU= Received: by 10.38.72.79 with SMTP id u79mr4604807rna; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:24:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:24:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:24:56 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: Christopher Nehren In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <003101c5386f$af071750$230110ac@fortunato> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:24:58 -0000 On Apr 3, 2005 9:07 PM, Christopher Nehren wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2005-04-03, Gert Cuykens scribbled these > curious markings: > > It doesnt have colors > > So? It's a boot manager, not a piece of artwork. > > > It doesnt look pretty > > Ditto. > > > It writes ?? instead of windows > > It prints ?? because it can't possibly imagine why you'd want to make > that choice. :) > > > Nobody knows how it works for example how to install it witout sysinstall :P > > Someone else responded to this. > This is a nice explanation about boot stuff but it would be nicer if it had the words man boot0cfg somewhere :P http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/users-introduction.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 19:25:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EEAB16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:25:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F34743D3F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:25:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1011160rng for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:25:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=NJ+rcH+EQwwAX6Mb9H6uCrjinQhHlJuYidtwWtjmbNTGoTIZE5/eY/dsoWyNiX2Q8RTkZPDf/FY6QL58j6DPOd4XkHLblvqcp/E/2FT8nKAwAmnWEPOmVhwVyo2ARB2rR5jtUridrzRXQC22oYAJdCVIiZ6UQoOiF9GOtDbEn3w= Received: by 10.39.1.30 with SMTP id d30mr3664874rni; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:25:51 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: Christopher Nehren In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <003101c5386f$af071750$230110ac@fortunato> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:25:52 -0000 On Apr 3, 2005 9:24 PM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Apr 3, 2005 9:07 PM, Christopher Nehren > wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 2005-04-03, Gert Cuykens scribbled these > > curious markings: > > > It doesnt have colors > > > > So? It's a boot manager, not a piece of artwork. > > > > > It doesnt look pretty > > > > Ditto. > > > > > It writes ?? instead of windows > > > > It prints ?? because it can't possibly imagine why you'd want to make > > that choice. :) > > > > > Nobody knows how it works for example how to install it witout sysinstall :P > > > > Someone else responded to this. > > > > This is a nice explanation about boot stuff but it would be nicer if > it had the words man boot0cfg somewhere :P > I ment this one :) http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/boot-blocks.html#BOOT-LOADER From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 19:54:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16B016A508 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:54:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net (outbound01.telus.net [199.185.220.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690DB43D39 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:54:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from graham.north@telus.net) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (really [64.180.174.22]) by priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP <20050403195413.MCNV22539.priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net@[192.168.0.100]> for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:54:13 -0600 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.308 [266.9.1]); Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:54:33 -0700 Message-ID: <425049F8.4050808@telus.net> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:54:32 -0700 From: Graham North User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=======AVGMAIL-425049F95CD3=======" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: [Fwd: Network Printing to Windows - CUPS?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:54:15 -0000 --=======AVGMAIL-425049F95CD3======= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello: Has anyone had any joy printing from FreeBSD box to Windows print server? CUPS? Pointers? I have 3 machince and would prefer to leave printer attached to WinXP box. Suse is running another machine, and even using their YAST config too. I was not able to make it print properly - it found the printer but spooled gobbletygook! nb. printer is an HP LaserJet 4L wihich well supported with drivers etc.. Thanks for any help. Graham/ Vancouver, Canada. --=======AVGMAIL-425049F95CD3======= Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: "AVG certification" No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 4/1/2005 --=======AVGMAIL-425049F95CD3=======-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 20:05:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBE316A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:05:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AF843D41 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:05:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from pooh.nagual.st (pooh.nagual.st [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.st with esmtp; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:05:25 +0200 Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:05:25 +0200 From: dick hoogendijk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050403220525.39ac28dd.dick@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <424F4FAD.7080300@ec.rr.com> References: <20050402173222.53977dd4.dick@nagual.st> <424F4FAD.7080300@ec.rr.com> Organization: nagual SiTe X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: device_polling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dick@nagual.st List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:05:29 -0000 On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:06:37 -0500 jason henson wrote: > dick hoogendijk wrote: > > >I was building a new kernel today and came across an option I had not > >seen before. I googled some and concluded that "options > >device_polling / options HZ=1000" would be a better way for my > >realtec network cards than the default interupt driven.. > > > >Is this correct?? Would it be better to have this polling in the > >kernel? (fbsd-4.11-stable) > > > > > > > I would say yes. Check man polling for extra info. I build a kernel with devoce_polling and hz=1000 and experimented a bit. Using "netstat -w 1" I see a drop in performance. In/output is about 20% higher if polling is disabled. That was not what I expexted. I really thought polling would be better. I use cheap rl (realtec 8139) cards. So I guess I will have to recompile without polling. For vmware3 I'll leave the HZ=1200 in. Don't understand it though.. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 20:26:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288C116A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:26:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04C843D46 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:26:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 16102 invoked by uid 510); 3 Apr 2005 21:28:16 +0100 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.83/710. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.7/5.0):. Processed in 1.900952 secs); 03 Apr 2005 20:28:16 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.7/5.0):. Processed in 1.900952 secs Process 16095) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 3 Apr 2005 21:28:13 +0100 From: Robert Slade To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1112560093.15815.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:28:13 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Rsync Setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:26:35 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to get my brain around rsync. What I am trying to do is synchronise 2 directories on different machines. I have an rsync server running on one machine and running it as a client on the other. I have been able to get this setup to work. However, it just syncs the directories on machine A with those on B. If B has a later version of the file on A it gets overwritten with the older version from A. I have done a fair bit of reading on rsync which leads me to believe that it will only work one way. Is this correct? If so, is there any other way of synchronising the 2 directories so that they end up with the latest version of the file(s) from either machine. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 20:28:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DEB16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:28:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr (smtp9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AD943D45 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:28:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0909.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A934824000C2 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:28:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0909.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 917BC240013D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:28:22 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050403202822595.917BC240013D@mwinf0909.wanadoo.fr Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:28:19 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <998918420.20050403222819@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050403220525.39ac28dd.dick@nagual.st> References: <20050402173222.53977dd4.dick@nagual.st> <424F4FAD.7080300@ec.rr.com> <20050403220525.39ac28dd.dick@nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: device_polling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:28:24 -0000 dick hoogendijk writes: > I build a kernel with devoce_polling and hz=1000 and experimented a bit. > Using "netstat -w 1" I see a drop in performance. In/output is about 20% > higher if polling is disabled. That was not what I expexted. I really > thought polling would be better. I use cheap rl (realtec 8139) cards. How fast is the processor on your system? -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 20:41:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347F316A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:41:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9652143D53 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:41:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.0.32] (charm.daemonsecurity.com [192.168.0.32]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BA6FD068; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:41:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42505500.5000902@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:41:36 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050314 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, en-gb, da, fr, de, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Slade References: <1112560093.15815.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1112560093.15815.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Rsync Setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:41:41 -0000 Robert Slade wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to get my brain around rsync. What I am trying to do is > synchronise 2 directories on different machines. I have an rsync server > running on one machine and running it as a client on the other. I have > been able to get this setup to work. However, it just syncs the > directories on machine A with those on B. If B has a later version of > the file on A it gets overwritten with the older version from A. > > I have done a fair bit of reading on rsync which leads me to believe > that it will only work one way. Is this correct? If so, is there any > other way of synchronising the 2 directories so that they end up with > the latest version of the file(s) from either machine. you can only do one way at a time, so what you need to do is: rsync machine_A:/pathA machine_B:/pathB rsync machine_B:/pathB machine_A:/pathA Then what you need is to find the correct options so that the first rsync does not overwrite files that should have been synced the other way. options -u and -t seems to do that. You can do this as a batch script on just one of the machines, so you don't get any race conditions. My options are -Cuvaz, but I only sync one way. You should be carefull: if clocks on the servers are out of sync, you may get syncing the wrong way! and you will have problems deleting files, this has to be done both places. If you instead can assing one machine as master and the other as slave, so you only sync one way, then you avoid all these problems. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 20:48:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9408516A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:48:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5249443D41 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:48:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57F15DC9; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:48:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77348-06; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:48:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-53-96.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.53.96]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84445DB3; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:48:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42505657.5020304@mac.com> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:47:19 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Slade References: <1112560093.15815.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1112560093.15815.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Rsync Setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:48:47 -0000 Robert Slade wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to get my brain around rsync. What I am trying to do is > synchronise 2 directories on different machines. I have an rsync server > running on one machine and running it as a client on the other. I have > been able to get this setup to work. However, it just syncs the > directories on machine A with those on B. If B has a later version of > the file on A it gets overwritten with the older version from A. > > I have done a fair bit of reading on rsync which leads me to believe > that it will only work one way. Is this correct? If so, is there any > other way of synchronising the 2 directories so that they end up with > the latest version of the file(s) from either machine. You want the "update" -u option: rsync -auv from to rsync -auv to from ...as in: % mkdir from to % touch from/a % echo 'hi' > to/a % touch to/b % echo 'bye' > from/b % rsync -auv from to building file list ... done from/ from/a from/b sent 188 bytes received 60 bytes 496.00 bytes/sec total size is 4 speedup is 0.02 % rsync -auv to from building file list ... done to/ to/a to/b to/from/ to/from/a to/from/b sent 321 bytes received 100 bytes 842.00 bytes/sec total size is 7 speedup is 0.02 % cat to/a hi % cat to/b % cat from/a % cat from/b bye -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 20:48:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F03216A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:48:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net (outbound01.telus.net [199.185.220.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832E643D46 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:48:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from graham.north@telus.net) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (really [64.180.174.22]) by priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP <20050403204858.PPVJ5138.priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net@[192.168.0.100]> for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:48:58 -0600 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.308 [266.9.1]); Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:49:17 -0700 Message-ID: <425056CD.3070009@telus.net> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:49:17 -0700 From: Graham North User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: questions freebsd Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=======AVGMAIL-425056CD43A4=======" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Webmin - ssh - 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:48:59 -0000 --=======AVGMAIL-425056CD43A4======= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello: I just installed Webmin - great program. Q - the telnet/ssh portion does not seem to work properly. It opens an ssh window for me but the window is unresponsive. It is configured for ssh instead of telnet, and I have port 22 open on my router. I am able to ssh into my server using Putty from Windows so my sshd is working fine. Webmin says that it has opened a connection but then just presents me with an unresponsive cursor, no prompts for username or password (maybe Wemin took care of that?) no feedback or response to keystrokes. Has anyone used this feature of Webmin ? had similar problems? Resolved? Extra note - this webmin only seems to have config options up to 4.10 - and therefore I entered that as the version number (for 4.11) - not sure whether that would make a difference? Cheers, Graham/ Vancouver, Canada --=======AVGMAIL-425056CD43A4======= Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: "AVG certification" No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 4/1/2005 --=======AVGMAIL-425056CD43A4=======-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 20:51:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE9916A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:51:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fuse1.fusemail.net (smtp.fusemail.net [69.31.1.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5801943D1D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:51:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brianjohn@fusemail.com) Received: from fusemail.com by fuse1.fusemail.net with asmtp (FuseMail extSMTP) id 1DIC4K-0008Qh-Ff for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:51:40 -0500 Received: from 24.118.72.147 (FuseMail web AccountID 19592) by webmail.fusemail.com with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:51:47 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <1391.24.118.72.147.1112561507.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:51:47 -0500 (CDT) From: "Brian John" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: FuseMail W MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: brianjohn@fusemail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:51:48 -0000 Hello, I just got an xDSL system. In Windows I can browse the internet and do whatever I want just fine. However, in FreeBSD the only things that work are my p2p programs. Azureus and amule work fine, they both connect and download. However, when I try to use dillo, Firefox or Thunderbird they always timeout when trying to access the net. Does anyone have any idea what I can do to fix this? I had cable internet before and it worked fine. The DSL modem is hooked up to the computer through Ethernet. Thanks /Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 20:58:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C00016A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:58:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD14B43D48 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:58:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DIC98-0001O5-NC for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:56:38 +0200 Received: from pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net ([68.83.169.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:56:38 +0200 Received: from apeiron+usenet by pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:56:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christopher Nehren Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Organization: /usr/bin/false Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <1391.24.118.72.147.1112561507.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:58:56 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-04-03, Brian John scribbled these curious markings: > Hello, I just got an xDSL system. In Windows I can browse the internet > and do whatever I want just fine. However, in FreeBSD the only things > that work are my p2p programs. Azureus and amule work fine, they both > connect and download. However, when I try to use dillo, Firefox or > Thunderbird they always timeout when trying to access the net. Does > anyone have any idea what I can do to fix this? I had cable internet > before and it worked fine. The DSL modem is hooked up to the computer > through Ethernet. Sounds like a DNS issue, considering that most P2P programs are IP-based and thus don't need to perform DNS lookups. Best Regards, Christopher Nehren -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUFjKk/lo7zvzJioRAnrNAJ0X+zBILiTL1qVJeGeYuuvXHk/2GACghku7 bltB+Pyu2SbzyCtYxYSvI6I= =gG5y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson If you ask the wrong questions, you get answers like "42" and "God". Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 21:03:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6360216A4CF for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:03:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.infinitebubble.com (pia140-70.pioneernet.net [66.114.140.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79E543D41 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:03:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@infinitebubble.com) Received: from localhost (thor.infinitebubble.com [10.10.1.1]) by mail.infinitebubble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA37B33F72 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.infinitebubble.com ([10.10.1.3]) by localhost (thor.infinitebubble.com [10.10.1.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21683-02 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.253] (unknown [192.168.1.253]) by mail.infinitebubble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1616A33C77 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42505AB3.6090602@infinitebubble.com> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:05:55 -0700 From: Jason Taylor User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at infinitebubble.com Subject: Formating a 1680k floppy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:03:16 -0000 How do I format a 1680k floppy? I tried: %fdformat -s 21,,,,80 /dev/fd0 That just produces a line of errors. That is EEEE... instead of VVVV.... I'm able to format the same floppy in Windows using WinImage. %uname -a FreeBSD odin.infinitebubble.com 5.3-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0: Mon Jan 3 21:48:36 PST 2005 jason@odin.infinitebubble.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 21:07:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3595916A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:07:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr (smtp9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB0D43D53 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:07:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0904.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1DAFC24001BD for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:07:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0904.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 05B9024001B9 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:07:43 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050403210744235.05B9024001B9@mwinf0904.wanadoo.fr Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:07:43 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1007514950.20050403230743@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1391.24.118.72.147.1112561507.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> References: <1391.24.118.72.147.1112561507.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:07:45 -0000 Brian John writes: > Hello, I just got an xDSL system. In Windows I can browse the internet > and do whatever I want just fine. However, in FreeBSD the only things > that work are my p2p programs. Azureus and amule work fine, they both > connect and download. However, when I try to use dillo, Firefox or > Thunderbird they always timeout when trying to access the net. Are you sure your ISP doesn't block any ports or force any traffic through proxy servers? -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 21:15:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753D816A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:15:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F237043D3F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:15:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:10079 helo=mail.aseed.antenna.nl) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DICQw-000Bea-4Q; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:15:02 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by mail.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBB115462A; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:15:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (f80052.upc-f.chello.nl [80.56.80.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1095458CBC5; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:15:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:14:59 +0200 From: "albi@scii.nl" To: brianjohn@fusemail.com Message-Id: <20050403231459.0ae0f091.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <1391.24.118.72.147.1112561507.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> References: <1391.24.118.72.147.1112561507.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:15:03 -0000 On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:51:47 -0500 (CDT) "Brian John" wrote: > Hello, I just got an xDSL system. In Windows I can browse the > internet and do whatever I want just fine. However, in FreeBSD the > only things that work are my p2p programs. Azureus and amule work > fine, they both connect and download. However, when I try to use > dillo, Firefox or Thunderbird they always timeout when trying to > access the net. Does anyone have any idea what I can do to fix this? > I had cable internet before and it worked fine. The DSL modem is > hooked up to the computer through Ethernet. sounds like a DNS-issue, check your /etc/resolv.conf, if your ISP does not use DHCP then you have to fill /etc/resolv.conf yourself http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/book.html section 11.10.2.1 tells you more From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 21:22:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71AE16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:22:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fuse1.fusemail.net (smtp.fusemail.net [69.31.1.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8E143D3F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:22:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brianjohn@fusemail.com) Received: from fusemail.com by fuse1.fusemail.net with asmtp (FuseMail extSMTP) id 1DICXZ-0004i1-Rf for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:21:53 -0500 Received: from 24.118.72.147 (FuseMail web AccountID 19592) by webmail.fusemail.com with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:22:01 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <1819.24.118.72.147.1112563321.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:22:01 -0500 (CDT) From: "Brian John" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: FuseMail W MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: brianjohn@fusemail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:22:01 -0000 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2005-04-03, Brian John scribbled these > curious markings: > > Hello, I just got an xDSL system. In Windows I can browse the internet > > and do whatever I want just fine. However, in FreeBSD the only things > > that work are my p2p programs. Azureus and amule work fine, they both > > connect and download. However, when I try to use dillo, Firefox or > > Thunderbird they always timeout when trying to access the net. Does > > anyone have any idea what I can do to fix this? I had cable internet > > before and it worked fine. The DSL modem is hooked up to the computer > > through Ethernet. > > Sounds like a DNS issue, considering that most P2P programs are > IP-based and thus don't need to perform DNS lookups. > > Best Regards, > Christopher Nehren > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) > > iD8DBQFCUFjKk/lo7zvzJioRAnrNAJ0X+zBILiTL1qVJeGeYuuvXHk/2GACghku7 > bltB+Pyu2SbzyCtYxYSvI6I= > =gG5y > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded > pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson > If you ask the wrong questions, you get answers like "42" and "God". > Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > How can I fix it if it's a DNS issue? Is there someplace I can set that up? /Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 21:22:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AC116A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:22:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fuse1.fusemail.net (smtp.fusemail.net [69.31.1.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9652443D53 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:22:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brianjohn@fusemail.com) Received: from fusemail.com by fuse1.fusemail.net with asmtp (FuseMail extSMTP) id 1DICYC-0004py-Lg; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:22:32 -0500 Received: from 24.118.72.147 (FuseMail web AccountID 19592) by webmail.fusemail.com with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:22:40 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <1823.24.118.72.147.1112563360.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:22:40 -0500 (CDT) From: "Brian John" To: "Anthony Atkielski" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: FuseMail W MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: brianjohn@fusemail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:22:40 -0000 > Brian John writes: > > > Hello, I just got an xDSL system. In Windows I can browse the internet > > and do whatever I want just fine. However, in FreeBSD the only things > > that work are my p2p programs. Azureus and amule work fine, they both > > connect and download. However, when I try to use dillo, Firefox or > > Thunderbird they always timeout when trying to access the net. > > Are you sure your ISP doesn't block any ports or force any traffic > through proxy servers? > > -- > Anthony > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I don't think so because it works fine in Windows. Wouldn't it not work in windows if that was the case? /Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 21:28:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE5416A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:28:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022C743D49 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:28:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from pooh.nagual.st (pooh.nagual.st [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.st with esmtp; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:28:15 +0200 Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:28:14 +0200 From: dick hoogendijk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050403232814.4057f19c.dick@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <998918420.20050403222819@wanadoo.fr> References: <20050402173222.53977dd4.dick@nagual.st> <424F4FAD.7080300@ec.rr.com> <20050403220525.39ac28dd.dick@nagual.st> <998918420.20050403222819@wanadoo.fr> Organization: nagual SiTe X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: device_polling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dick@nagual.st List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:28:18 -0000 On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:28:19 +0200 Anthony Atkielski wrote: > dick hoogendijk writes: > > > I build a kernel with devoce_polling and hz=1000 and experimented a > > bit. Using "netstat -w 1" I see a drop in performance. In/output is > > about 20% higher if polling is disabled. That was not what I > > expexted. I really thought polling would be better. I use cheap rl > > (realtec 8139) cards. > > How fast is the processor on your system? Not fast.. rather slow ;-) It's a duron-800 ; 512Mb memory Why? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 22:08:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F188916A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:08:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-09.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BDE443D31 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:08:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: (qmail 5787 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2005 22:08:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warren.shinji.nq.nu) (203.217.81.22) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 3 Apr 2005 22:08:45 -0000 From: Warren To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:08:09 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504040808.13057.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Subject: how to install a patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:08:48 -0000 I was given a patch to try out for a program, but am unsure as to how to apply it/install it -- Yours Sincerely Shinjii http://www.shinji.nq.nu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 22:17:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58AF16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:17:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx.dccnet.com (mx.dccnet.com [24.207.1.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947C243D3F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:17:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from canonalis@dccnet.com) Received: from [192.168.121.110] (unverified [24.207.88.142]) by mx4.dccnet.com (DCCNet Email Cluster) with ESMTP id 2332274 for multiple; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:17:29 -0800 Message-ID: <42506B78.6050309@dccnet.com> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:17:28 -0700 From: "Kevin G. Eliuk" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Taylor References: <42505AB3.6090602@infinitebubble.com> In-Reply-To: <42505AB3.6090602@infinitebubble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Formating a 1680k floppy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:17:31 -0000 Jason Taylor wrote: > How do I format a 1680k floppy? I tried: > > %fdformat -s 21,,,,80 /dev/fd0 > > That just produces a line of errors. That is EEEE... instead of > VVVV.... I'm able to format the same floppy in Windows using WinImage. Are you sure you don't mean 1720k? Look at "/etc/disktab" for stressing a floppy. -- Cheers, Kevin. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 23:17:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B65616A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:17:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0FBB43D1F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:17:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gibblertron@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so1042386rnf for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:17:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sSh4EBxX2GAR0zPuhHsW2780QKQ1LTJyXQ90AkpNq9scSlgIt7RCLtBFXHWWoFOhXhAitsFiQ0iJKLHHNmf7/2MH4dqbkY7mlN6SEEm2hcLah0bFwMIDiV+nePILTyKp3xP/OvL1AT3/eYD99Rv64hI2MlN8MLKH5VnIyFrfHLI= Received: by 10.38.82.78 with SMTP id f78mr2057773rnb; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:17:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.79.52 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:17:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:17:37 -0700 From: patrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Adding a default route for a specific NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: patrick List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:17:38 -0000 I have a FreeBSD 4.11 server with two NICs -- one has a real IP (bge0) and the other has an internal IP (bge1, 192.168.42.6). The default route for the server (defaultrouter= in rc.conf) is the gateway for the real IP. How can I set a route such that traffic going out on bge1 goes through a different router, even if it's to the outside world? Basically, I have a jailed setup running with a private IP address. On the private network, there is a gateway machine that's setup to NAT the traffic out to the internet. Currently, I cannot get out to the internet from the jail unless I set the default route of the entire server to be my internal NAT gateway. Any ideas? Thanks, Patrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 23:23:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD79916A4CF for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:23:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web61305.mail.yahoo.com (web61305.mail.yahoo.com [216.155.196.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05E9A43D46 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:23:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill_ding5@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 49327 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Apr 2005 23:23:14 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=CcRfdnT7FCnpI4eYe12wlmEY6sK9y62594lZYlc7POsmUGxLi+/ew8sHC1J8T3AbDLN9bvjJ6NgUuF0BRPgH//p3S9lja2nxGxI0w6LYaDhSJFApPFV7W7Iti7pOCk4+jNl/d1L52/4lvm6FDCcqQRlLxfh6//FqWVSvHAuhXNg= ; Message-ID: <20050403232314.49325.qmail@web61305.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.157.24.232] by web61305.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:23:14 PDT Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:23:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Ding To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: looking for jail tutorial X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:23:15 -0000 Hello, Running 5.3-p6 on a box with two NICs. I'm new to the list and FreeBSD in general. I'm trying to find more documentation on jail(8) than is offered in the man page. (I checked the Handbook but couldn't find anything about jails. Did I miss it?) For instance, the man page says: NOTE: It is important that only appropriate device nodes in devfs be exposed to a jail; access to disk devices in the jail may permit processes in the jail to bypass the jail sandboxing by modifying files outside of the jail. How do I know what the "appropriate device nodes" are for a given jail? I want to run four jails: two webservers, DNS, mail. After testing, the DNS and email jails will be shutdown and the services moved to separate machines. Also, do I configure identical Hosts files on each? Should the jails be on different subnets for added security or can they all be on the same subnet as the host machine? Any help you can give would be appreciated! Thanx, Bill The word 'politics' describes the situation so well: 'poli' meaning 'many' and 'tics' meaning 'bloodsucking creatures'. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Make Yahoo! your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 23:37:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E7E16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:37:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web61310.mail.yahoo.com (web61310.mail.yahoo.com [216.155.196.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 652D543D1D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:37:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill_ding5@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 13572 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Apr 2005 23:37:27 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=gtbLOScPlZ4zxF/roYoLbaAn5Iz5WX/txClNG4CJFLTlcBFAPP7+qmoXFN1MMV8XCwGiu+JY7Xg6ot6d27n1jYZIGzSoyGu5O58bWa1u9xADInt7Ijyzc7Lf86xEd5g186Sy6k9xhOcNSYomkqyl7SY3J4haorPCOMS/Vomk4uQ= ; Message-ID: <20050403233727.13570.qmail@web61310.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.157.24.232] by web61310.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:37:27 PDT Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:37:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Ding To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: how to restrict lpd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:37:29 -0000 Hello, I am setting up some jails and have limited all the host daemons to the host's IP except for lpd. I can't find a way of doing that. Can it be done? I know it can in LPRng, but I prefer to install as little software as possible on servers. Thanx, Bill The word 'politics' describes the situation so well: 'poli' meaning 'many' and 'tics' meaning 'bloodsucking creatures'. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. http://personals.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 23:50:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B831416A4DA for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:50:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DCE43D1F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:50:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050403235040.JYLB4618.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:50:40 -0400 From: To: "Bill Ding" , Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:50:39 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050403232314.49325.qmail@web61305.mail.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: looking for jail tutorial X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:50:42 -0000 You should search this lists archives for answers first. In the list archives I found this. http://subwiki.honeypot.net/cgi-bin/view/Freebsd/JailAdmin http://jailnotes.cg.nu/ > Does anyone have any bright ideas for good file system layouts when > running multiple jails? I won't say they are bright, but the ideas reflected in this layout are working well for me: /jails/ Home for most jail related material. Note I do not backup /jails every night as I do other partitions. (I do backup /data every night and you'll see below how I make use of that in a jail.) /jails is its own partition so if it fills, it will not cause problems for the host system. /jails/{jail_X}/ The root for one specific jail. Of course if you have sets of jails, then /jails/jail_A/{cell_1,cell_2} and /jails/jail_B/{cell_10,cell_11} where cell_# is actually the root directory works well for keeping them well organized. /jails/etc/rc.d/ Startup scripts (e.g. jail_X.sh) for all jails. If you augment $local_startup in /etc/rc.conf to include /jails/etc/rc.d then all the jails will be started automatically. /jails/bin/ Jail management scripts. .../bin/JAIL_CTL.sh A generic start, stop, enter, trace, ps script. Each jail's startup script sets a bunch of environment variables and then calls JAIL_CTL. .../bin/jail_clone duplicates a jail. .../bin/jail_ps runs ps for all the processes in a specific jail. /jails/var/trace/ Home for kdump traces of jail execution. /jails/template/ A reference jail that I can clone in a few minutes time. Much easier then running (make world) every time I need a new jail. /data/jails/{jail_X}/ If there is a /data/jails/{jail_X} present, then it is automatically mounted as /jails/{jail_X}/data when the jail is started. That way the /data directory in a jail can be treated separately then from the rest of the jail. One caveat if you do this. Multiple jails, each with their own uid space, will rapidly overlap in the host's uid space. To avoid this, my jail creation script hashes the jail's IP address to create a (relatively) unique starting point for that jail's uids. That starting uid is placed in the jail's /etc/adduser.conf as $uid_start. This minimizes the chances that uids will collide. /data/jails/{jail_X}/home/ Symlink to /data/home (in the jail of course). If /data/jails/{jail_X} is mounted on the jail's /data, then the home partition in the jail is actually coming from /data of the host and therefore will be backed up on a regular basis. /data/jails/{jail_X}/proc/ If it is present, then /proc is mounted on this directory when a jail is started and unmounted when it is stopped. > How do I stop /var/log in one the jails from filling up the whole drive > and affecting the rest without giving each jail it's own partition? > > Is it possible to some how set a quota on how large a particular > directory can get? About all I can think of is to make a directory, and all its subordinate directories, owned by a specific user. You can then have per user quotas. For the specific example of /var/log, you'd have to set the user to be root_X. If you then set the user-ID-on-execution bit (see chmod(1) or chmod(2)) for /var/log so all new files and directories created under it would also be owned by root_X. I suspect you'd have to pre-populate your /var/log directory and chown everything to root_X. If you then change everything there to have world write permissions then root in the jail can update the files. Having world write access is a bad idea, but it's your trade-off to consider. managing passwd in a jailed env. Well i have the answer. just ran across the pw command, and looked it up. guess what i found. pw -V etcdir daoh! pw -V /usr/jail1/etc adduser bubba daoh, daoh!! pw -V /usr/jail1/etc usermod bubba -h 0 New password for user bubba: dd if=/dev/daoh of=/dev/stdout bs=1048576 count=1 so to some up, pw does everything i need to manage users in a jail, from outside of the jail. i knew there was something out there to do this with. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Bill Ding Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:23 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: looking for jail tutorial Hello, Running 5.3-p6 on a box with two NICs. I'm new to the list and FreeBSD in general. I'm trying to find more documentation on jail(8) than is offered in the man page. (I checked the Handbook but couldn't find anything about jails. Did I miss it?) For instance, the man page says: NOTE: It is important that only appropriate device nodes in devfs be exposed to a jail; access to disk devices in the jail may permit processes in the jail to bypass the jail sandboxing by modifying files outside of the jail. How do I know what the "appropriate device nodes" are for a given jail? I want to run four jails: two webservers, DNS, mail. After testing, the DNS and email jails will be shutdown and the services moved to separate machines. Also, do I configure identical Hosts files on each? Should the jails be on different subnets for added security or can they all be on the same subnet as the host machine? Any help you can give would be appreciated! Thanx, Bill The word 'politics' describes the situation so well: 'poli' meaning 'many' and 'tics' meaning 'bloodsucking creatures'. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Make Yahoo! your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 00:08:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AAF16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 00:08:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571B543D2D for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 00:08:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gibblertron@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so1047516rnf for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:08:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=tDwEK6Hl2579GxdFZQmqFBo3ZD8ZCzdqFLl97gjHlJrunz1Wwhf9SOElo1Y8y0ceCKkcgcALsYkJwtPwcIPFg2R2W1T/PL9uaEfhAb3QzMXfAV8eZCOPZnqSgWOhJlu6wcCel/5QT0UDjUwRuoepRjE1wWX+x5gRXUusHjMXwL8= Received: by 10.38.82.78 with SMTP id f78mr2085552rnb; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.79.52 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:08:47 -0700 From: patrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: Subject: Re: Adding a default route for a specific NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: patrick List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 00:08:48 -0000 To follow-up, I basically want to say: if traffic originals from 192.168.42.6, use 192.168.42.3 as the default gatway else use default gateway for bge0... Patrick On Apr 3, 2005 4:17 PM, patrick wrote: > I have a FreeBSD 4.11 server with two NICs -- one has a real IP (bge0) > and the other has an internal IP (bge1, 192.168.42.6). > > The default route for the server (defaultrouter= in rc.conf) is the > gateway for the real IP. How can I set a route such that traffic going > out on bge1 goes through a different router, even if it's to the > outside world? > > Basically, I have a jailed setup running with a private IP address. On > the private network, there is a gateway machine that's setup to NAT > the traffic out to the internet. Currently, I cannot get out to the > internet from the jail unless I set the default route of the entire > server to be my internal NAT gateway. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > > Patrick > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 00:18:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1ED516A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 00:18:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fuse1.fusemail.net (smtp.fusemail.net [69.31.1.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5F443D31 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 00:18:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brianjohn@fusemail.com) Received: from fusemail.com by fuse1.fusemail.net with asmtp (FuseMail extSMTP) id 1DIFIo-00077c-8g for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:18:50 -0500 Received: from 24.118.72.147 (FuseMail web AccountID 19592) by webmail.fusemail.com with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:19:03 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <1143.24.118.72.147.1112573943.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:19:03 -0500 (CDT) From: "Brian John" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: FuseMail W MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: RE: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: brianjohn@fusemail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 00:18:59 -0000 I didn't use any config files for this. I never had to use any to get my cable modem to work either. What config files should I be looking at? /Brian ----- Original Message ----- > Sounds to me as if you don't have your FreeBSD system configured > correctly for DSL modem hookup. > > Post the config files you used to accomplish this. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Brian John > Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 4:52 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail > > Hello, I just got an xDSL system. In Windows I can browse the > internet > and do whatever I want just fine. However, in FreeBSD the only > things > that work are my p2p programs. Azureus and amule work fine, they > both > connect and download. However, when I try to use dillo, Firefox or > Thunderbird they always timeout when trying to access the net. Does > anyone have any idea what I can do to fix this? I had cable > internet > before and it worked fine. The DSL modem is hooked up to the > computer > through Ethernet. > > Thanks > > /Brian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 00:38:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E139016A4D4 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 00:38:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail08.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail08.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11A643D5A for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 00:37:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail@iaindooley.com) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (c220-237-12-31.randw1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.237.12.31]) (authenticated bits=0)j340boUn029207 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:37:55 +1000 Message-ID: <42511A9F.2070003@iaindooley.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:44:47 +0000 From: Iain Dooley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (X11/20041107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050403184746.3D1C516A4F2@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20050403184746.3D1C516A4F2@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Managing compact source tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 00:38:02 -0000 hi, i'm just upgrading my thinkpad to 5.3 RELEASE. when i use anything other than 'src-all' to update my sources via CVSUP, i get errors in the buildworld process. i can comment out games, kerberos and crypto packages and then pass -DNOGAMES, -DNO_KERBEROS AND -DNOCRYPTO to make buildworld, but the HDD on my laptop is very small and i want to have a distro that only takes up a couple of hundred MB. to do this, i want to remove a lot of the applications out of contrib (i essentially just use this laptop as a mobile terminal to ssh into my home computer from my home and university wireless networks). how can i set up my source tree so that when i cvsup i only get the source i am interested in? also, is it the Makefiles that i have to edit in order to stop make buildworld from trying to build non-existent source? thanks iain From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 00:47:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DECF16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 00:47:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D41843D46 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 00:47:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gibblertron@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so1051047rnf for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:47:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=q6g5A29NV+uis5BCbldI39yWfNn/3kC5AjdxI4WodeyjBCsL+fMtUcwnDca+oyNInAcTkJMSY+g9EeExTW2O1YSA49KW6XSIfpfzmNVLWG6NvdhYqzCXBYAnNQw92mcwdrXKBukZYxPfr62hyZr0BRg/eI8dZlBOws8bIegsHe0= Received: by 10.38.1.73 with SMTP id 73mr4324105rna; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:47:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.79.52 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:47:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:47:40 -0700 From: patrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: Subject: Re: Adding a default route for a specific NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: patrick List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 00:47:41 -0000 And one more bit of info that might be helpful to know... The jail I've setup will serve sites on various IP addresses. Since FreeBSD jails by default only allow one IP, I've given the jail an internal IP, and am just forwarding the desired ports on the external IPs into the jail's IP using ipfw. This is all working fine, so the only thing left for me to solve is how to get things in my jail working so that I can make outbound TCP connections. Thanks again, Patrick On Apr 3, 2005 4:17 PM, patrick wrote: > I have a FreeBSD 4.11 server with two NICs -- one has a real IP (bge0) > and the other has an internal IP (bge1, 192.168.42.6). > > The default route for the server (defaultrouter= in rc.conf) is the > gateway for the real IP. How can I set a route such that traffic going > out on bge1 goes through a different router, even if it's to the > outside world? > > Basically, I have a jailed setup running with a private IP address. On > the private network, there is a gateway machine that's setup to NAT > the traffic out to the internet. Currently, I cannot get out to the > internet from the jail unless I set the default route of the entire > server to be my internal NAT gateway. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > > Patrick > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 01:11:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6F216A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 01:11:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web61307.mail.yahoo.com (web61307.mail.yahoo.com [216.155.196.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5685A43D67 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 01:11:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill_ding5@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 400 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Apr 2005 01:11:26 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=3IJbNqgLxV3FDSeCo1ofEghSvdk6G0nLQwbcJ7FSMtDIMvKiPovhPH1eehcXKnW6wqVizncdQg73RGj3JNaJJGiKBXzevQrYLsOmRrY0acodxW73D+P9rhj/lWP6FSzBlJI6tpkfBb+FR/P7XDHm1obIG9wkaLrv70sWrIfAH8A= ; Message-ID: <20050404011126.398.qmail@web61307.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.157.24.232] by web61307.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:11:26 PDT Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:11:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Ding To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Fwd: RE: looking for jail tutorial X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 01:11:28 -0000 --- bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > You should search this lists archives for answers first. > In the list archives I found this. > > http://subwiki.honeypot.net/cgi-bin/view/Freebsd/JailAdmin > > > http://jailnotes.cg.nu/ > > > Does anyone have any bright ideas for good file system layouts > when > > running multiple jails? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Bill Ding > Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:23 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: looking for jail tutorial > > Hello, > > Running 5.3-p6 on a box with two NICs. > > I'm new to the list and FreeBSD in general. I'm trying > to find more documentation on jail(8) than is offered > in the man page. (I checked the Handbook but couldn't > find anything about jails. Did I miss it?) For > instance, the man page says: > > NOTE: It is important that only appropriate device > nodes in devfs be exposed to a jail; access to disk > devices in the jail may permit processes in the jail > to > bypass the jail sandboxing by modifying files outside > of the jail. > > How do I know what the "appropriate device nodes" are > for a given jail? I want to run four jails: two > webservers, DNS, mail. After testing, the DNS and > email jails will be shutdown and the services moved to > separate machines. > Also, do I configure identical Hosts files on each? > Should the jails be on different subnets for added > security or can they all be on the same subnet as the > host machine? > Any help you can give would be appreciated! > > Thanx, > > Bill > Thanks for the response. I tried looking through the mail archives but the hits either more or less repeat the man page or deal with unrelated questions (or have nothing to do with jails at all). Also, I had already gone to both those sites, and neither answered my questions. Regards, Bill The word 'politics' describes the situation so well: 'poli' meaning 'many' and 'tics' meaning 'bloodsucking creatures'. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 01:32:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1337816A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 01:32:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D4D43D2D for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 01:32:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fewjr@adelphia.net) Received: from CTU ([69.174.145.177]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050404013251.YDNT2192.mta9.adelphia.net@CTU> for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:32:51 -0400 Message-ID: <000001c538b6$4151cb50$040a000a@CTU> From: "Francis Whittington" To: Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:29:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: ipfilter.log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 01:32:53 -0000 Hi guys, I've been following this guide: http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php So far I have gotten the firewall/router to work. Everything seems to be = okay, except I do not see anything being logged in ipfilter.log. My = rc.conf options are: moused_enable=3D"YES" moused_port=3D"/dev/psm0" moused_type=3D"auto" moused_flags=3D"-m 2=3D3" allscreens_flags=3D"-m on -c blink -h 200" clear_tmp_enable=3D"YES" hostname=3D"gateway.fbsdbuds.com" saver=3D"logo" ifconfig_rl0=3D"DHCP" ipfilter_enable=3D"YES" ipfilter_rules=3D"/etc/ipf.rules"=20 ipmon_enable=3D"YES" ipmon_flags=3D"-Ds"=20 ipnat_enable=3D"YES" =20 ipnat_rules=3D"/etc/ipnat.rules" ifconfig_rl1=3D"inet 10.0.10.2 netmask 255.255.255.248" gateway_enable=3D"YES" I am using ipf.rules and ipnat.rules. I created ipfilter.log in = /var/log/ and I added this line to syslog.conf: Local0.* /var/log/ipfilter.log and I added the following line to newsyslog.conf for rotating the log. /var/log/ipfilter.log 600 5 100 $M1D0 J I was wondering if anyone could tell me why I do not get anything in my = ipfilter.log. Thanks fewjr/Buddy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 01:45:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3ED516A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 01:45:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D4B43D1F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 01:45:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B433351619; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:45:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:45:49 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Iain Dooley Message-ID: <20050404014549.GA25452@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050403184746.3D1C516A4F2@hub.freebsd.org> <42511A9F.2070003@iaindooley.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FCuugMFkClbJLl1L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42511A9F.2070003@iaindooley.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Managing compact source tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 01:45:51 -0000 --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:44:47AM +0000, Iain Dooley wrote: > hi, i'm just upgrading my thinkpad to 5.3 RELEASE. when i use anything=20 > other than 'src-all' to update my sources via CVSUP, i get errors in the= =20 > buildworld process. Correct. > how can i set up my source tree so that when i cvsup i only get the sourc= e=20 > i am interested in? That's not supported. Kris --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUJxNWry0BWjoQKURAgbBAJ9fI/e2IN+RR4/pqKTBvCZDgX/xwgCgvWy/ qu0j0xHOg5ONniC0fEpdkfY= =j8Ap -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 01:54:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB6616A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 01:54:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sockeye.firmanix.com (sockeye.firmanix.com [216.127.139.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E7943D3F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 01:54:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@firman.us) Received: from andy by sockeye.firmanix.com with local (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1DIGnS-000NGw-5N for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:54:34 -0400 Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:54:34 -0400 From: Andy Firman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050404015434.GA89369@sockeye.firmanix.com> References: <000001c538b6$4151cb50$040a000a@CTU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000001c538b6$4151cb50$040a000a@CTU> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: ipfilter.log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andy Firman List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 01:54:26 -0000 On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 09:29:13PM -0400, Francis Whittington wrote: > I am using ipf.rules and ipnat.rules. I created ipfilter.log in /var/log/ and I added this line to syslog.conf: > Local0.* /var/log/ipfilter.log > and I added the following line to newsyslog.conf for rotating the log. > /var/log/ipfilter.log 600 5 100 $M1D0 J > I was wondering if anyone could tell me why I do not get anything in my ipfilter.log. I asked the same thing about a month ago with no answer. What I ended up doing was putting this in /etc/rc.conf: ipmon_flags="-Dvn /var/log/firewall" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 02:06:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B3B16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 02:06:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fuse1.fusemail.net (smtp.fusemail.net [69.31.1.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD96643D49 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 02:06:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brianjohn@fusemail.com) Received: from fusemail.com by fuse1.fusemail.net with asmtp (FuseMail extSMTP) id 1DIGyk-0008Ex-BJ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:06:14 -0500 Message-ID: <42509308.9050506@fusemail.com> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:06:16 -0500 From: Brian John User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050315) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "albi@scii.nl" References: <1391.24.118.72.147.1112561507.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> <20050403231459.0ae0f091.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <20050403231459.0ae0f091.albi@scii.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 02:06:25 -0000 albi@scii.nl wrote: >On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:51:47 -0500 (CDT) >"Brian John" wrote: > > > >>Hello, I just got an xDSL system. In Windows I can browse the >>internet and do whatever I want just fine. However, in FreeBSD the >>only things that work are my p2p programs. Azureus and amule work >>fine, they both connect and download. However, when I try to use >>dillo, Firefox or Thunderbird they always timeout when trying to >>access the net. Does anyone have any idea what I can do to fix this? >>I had cable internet before and it worked fine. The DSL modem is >>hooked up to the computer through Ethernet. >> >> > >sounds like a DNS-issue, check your /etc/resolv.conf, if your ISP does >not use DHCP then you have to fill /etc/resolv.conf yourself > >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/book.html >section 11.10.2.1 tells you more > > > > Ok, I think you may have pointed me to the source of the problem. Here is what my resolv.conf looks like after every time I reboot my compuer: search domain.actdsltmp nameserver 192.168.0.1 nameserver 205.171.3.65 Now, if I change it to this (using my secondary DNS server from my DSL modem's 'setup' page): search domain.actdsltmp nameserver 205.171.2.65 ...everything works. Is there a way that I could keep this from changing every time that I reboot my computer? Thanks for the help! /Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 02:12:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB25116A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 02:12:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fuse1.fusemail.net (smtp.fusemail.net [69.31.1.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF92F43D58 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 02:12:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brianjohn@fusemail.com) Received: from fusemail.com by fuse1.fusemail.net with asmtp (FuseMail extSMTP) id 1DIH4C-0000hE-EF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:11:52 -0500 Message-ID: <42509456.1060304@fusemail.com> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:11:50 -0500 From: Brian John User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050315) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: help with pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 02:12:03 -0000 Hello, I read the manpage on pf and constructed a basic set of rules and macros. However, when I start pf it gives me errors about the syntax of my file. Basically all I want to accomplish is I don't want my p2p programs to be able to hog the traffic away from me if I'm trying to surf. When I'm not surfing I want them to be able to download as fast as possible. Here is what I have added to pf.conf: ext_if="vr0" altq on $ext_if priq queue mail priority 13 queue ssh priority 12 queue web priority 14 pass in proto tcp from any to port http keep state queue web pass in proto tcp from any to port ssh keep state queue ssh pass in proto tcp from any to port {smtp imap} queue mail Does anyone know what I might have done wrong? I thought that I had it correct based on the manpage. I'm sure it's something really stupid that I missed. Thanks in advance for the help /Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 02:46:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75C216A4CE; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 02:46:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A8F43D46; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 02:46:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from frambozen (frambozen [192.168.1.9]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA76280; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:46:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:47:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Hill To: bob@a1poweruser.com In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050403223444.S53903@frambozen.monochrome.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com cc: Randy Pratt cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: dot.icabod@gmail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Freebsd Install Guide Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 02:46:16 -0000 On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > YES there is something major wrong with the official handbook. [snip] > The FreeBSD Install Guide is mirrored at the following sites. > > http://freebsd.easyasthat.co.uk/ > http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php > http://freebsd.packards-home.net/index.php > www.a1poweruser.com > http://freebsdinfo.org/ > http://freebsd.a1poweruser.com:6088/ > http://freebsd.95mb.com/ Since all of these URLs (those which respond, at least) go to essentially the same content, I have a few questions: 1) Who wrote this? 1a) Could it be Joseph Barbish? 2) Regardless, could the author be persuaded to contribute his/her wisdom to the official documentation, rather than verbally trash the latter? Persipiring minds want to know. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 02:47:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB1D16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 02:47:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2BA43D46 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 02:47:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-77.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.77]) by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD99B123AC3; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:46:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF43512B7AD; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:47:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59334-10; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:47:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from alpha (alpha.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DA012B02A; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:47:33 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?B?Qmr2cm4gS/ZuaWc=?= To: "'Brian John'" , Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:48:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcU4u927Rwkx9VZVQeCK2gsj33JdIQAA10yg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: <42509456.1060304@fusemail.com> Message-Id: <20050404024733.61DA012B02A@eurystheus.local> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Subject: RE: help with pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 02:47:56 -0000 Brian John wrote: > However, when I start pf it gives me errors=20 > about the syntax of my file. Read http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/queueing.html. There are good examples. Regards Bj=F6rn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 03:25:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C92816A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 03:25:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (joel.tallye.com [216.99.199.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A49E43D46 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 03:25:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lorenl@alzatex.com) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (hosea.tallye.com [127.0.0.1]) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j343PEUP009901 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:25:19 -0700 Received: (from sttng359@localhost) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10/Submit) id j343PE0g009899 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:25:14 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: hosea.tallye.com: sttng359 set sender to lorenl@alzatex.com using -f Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:25:13 -0700 From: "Loren M. Lang" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050404032513.GA4192@alzatex.com> References: <1443267912.20050212215132@wanadoo.fr> <200502121359.53523.bulliver@badcomputer.org> <992422833.20050213024853@wanadoo.fr> <00c101c51170$19af5ee0$4300a8c0@ostros> <909006882.20050213085459@wanadoo.fr> <1466272619.20050213093053@wanadoo.fr> <1453180591.20050213095312@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453180591.20050213095312@wanadoo.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C Subject: Re: X on a server Re: Freebsd vs. linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 03:25:23 -0000 --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:53:12AM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes: >=20 > > You can install the X libraries and client apps on your server -- this > > works fine at secure level 3 and does not require kernel configurations > > changes or special daemons or anything. What it allows you to do is=20 > > then link software against the X libraries and then redirect the=20 > > display to your workstations X server. This meets your criteria and=20 > > can be handy for certain things. Your apps still run in userland only > > and there is no HW touching stuff. You are not running the X Server on > > your FBSD Server machine. >=20 > I'll consider it, although it still sounds complicated. >=20 > What do I gain from X that I don't already have with remote terminal > sessions like those created with SecureCRT? I know it looks pretty, but > what server-related things can I do with X that I cannot do with > ordinary terminals? I'm not aware of anything right now; it seems that > everything can be done from a command line (thank goodness--working with > Windows is a nightmare precisely _because_ so many things cannot be done > from a command line). Ethereal vs. tcpdump. This is the biggest reason why I have X libraries on my firewall. I don't actually run an X server on it or even have a screen on it, but I forward X11 over ssh to the client I'm working on. >=20 > --=20 > Anthony >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --=20 I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: CEE1 AAE2 F66C 59B5 34CA C415 6D35 E847 0118 A3D2 =20 --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCULOZbTXoRwEYo9IRAlXrAJ9fI49OtxGx9sHh2eoYlk3oc7tAgwCeIWeX rd6wlljJ2RqktA9QB/CHeY4= =D3+o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 03:29:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB1516A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 03:29:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FDB43D39 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 03:29:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050404032926.DRYO2192.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:29:26 -0400 From: To: "Francis Whittington" , Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:29:21 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <000001c538b6$4151cb50$040a000a@CTU> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: ipfilter.log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 03:29:27 -0000 The answer is very simple. The integration of the open source ipfilter firewall into FreeBSD has changed between the 4.x releases and the 5.3 release just made available. If you change the syslog.conf: Local0.* /var/log/ipfilter.log which is how 4.10 & 4.11 work To security.* /var/log/ipfilter.log for 5.3 then every thing will work as documented. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Francis Whittington Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 9:29 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ipfilter.log Hi guys, I've been following this guide: http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php So far I have gotten the firewall/router to work. Everything seems to be okay, except I do not see anything being logged in ipfilter.log. My rc.conf options are: moused_enable="YES" moused_port="/dev/psm0" moused_type="auto" moused_flags="-m 2=3" allscreens_flags="-m on -c blink -h 200" clear_tmp_enable="YES" hostname="gateway.fbsdbuds.com" saver="logo" ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" ipfilter_enable="YES" ipfilter_rules="/etc/ipf.rules" ipmon_enable="YES" ipmon_flags="-Ds" ipnat_enable="YES" ipnat_rules="/etc/ipnat.rules" ifconfig_rl1="inet 10.0.10.2 netmask 255.255.255.248" gateway_enable="YES" I am using ipf.rules and ipnat.rules. I created ipfilter.log in /var/log/ and I added this line to syslog.conf: Local0.* /var/log/ipfilter.log and I added the following line to newsyslog.conf for rotating the log. /var/log/ipfilter.log 600 5 100 $M1D0 J I was wondering if anyone could tell me why I do not get anything in my ipfilter.log. Thanks fewjr/Buddy _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 03:40:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F2816A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 03:40:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neptune.atopia.net (neptune.atopia.net [209.128.231.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8A743D48 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 03:40:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (pcp173257pcs.plsntv01.nj.comcast.net [68.46.70.16]) by neptune.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782F440E7; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:40:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4250B71F.60309@atopia.net> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:40:15 -0400 From: Matt Juszczak User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041129) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RXJpayBOw7hyZ2FhcmQ=?= References: <424F8B94.7050006@atopia.net> <424FCDD3.6040507@locolomo.org> <425030A0.4000809@atopia.net> <42503A76.20309@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <42503A76.20309@locolomo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFILTER and NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 03:40:16 -0000 Erik, I already have that :-( ---snip--- # Default pass out pass out quick on em0 all keep state # Fragmented/Short/Opts/Fprinting packets block in quick on em0 all with ipopts block in quick on em0 all with frag block in quick on em0 proto tcp all with short block in quick on em0 proto tcp all flags FUP # Block local nets block in quick on em0 from 255.255.255.255/32 to any block in quick on em0 from 192.168.0.0/16 to any block in quick on em0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any block in quick on em0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any block in quick on em0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any block in quick on em0 from 0.0.0.0/32 to any ---snip--- Erik Nørgaard wrote: > Matt Juszczak wrote: > >> I dont have access to the nfs server... only the client. Your >> configuration info showed me making changes on the server. is there >> a way to make the client work ok? > > > Just let your client connect to any port on the server - keep state so > you can block incoming connections: > > pass out quick on proto tcp from /32 \ > to /32 flags S keep state > pass out quick on proto udp from /32 \ > to /32 keep state > > Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 04:07:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FCC16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:07:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A72743D48 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:07:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1063719rng for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:07:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fdu8kcmIxq5I1gLFxXXLBcHUlxLuotBsfTD+2LN/mAlUpMsclL+BbJoV91bm7ZlrsBd7NDiF6IzfgXqZn1IXW8fQPj02kuVLGZwkxgw0xTepNGf/0bXeIMt8QOirOn/zmoZEjs+wFLGbOThcCgXCnU5m6N/wVA0ftVIBk+oWvAY= Received: by 10.38.6.79 with SMTP id 79mr1490158rnf; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:07:47 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: exec make buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 04:07:48 -0000 Is it possible to do a ssh conection then do exec make buildworld on the remote system close the conection and do a conection again later and get the output from make buildworld again ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 04:12:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778D016A532 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:12:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238EE43D53 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:12:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1104.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B7D291C00094 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:12:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1104.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9D6831C00083 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:12:43 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050404041243644.9D6831C00083@mwinf1104.wanadoo.fr Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:12:43 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <583804515.20050404061243@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <42509308.9050506@fusemail.com> References: <1391.24.118.72.147.1112561507.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> <20050403231459.0ae0f091.albi@scii.nl> <42509308.9050506@fusemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 04:12:46 -0000 Brian John writes: > Now, if I change it to this (using my secondary DNS server from my DSL > modem's 'setup' page): > search domain.actdsltmp > nameserver 205.171.2.65 > > ...everything works. Is there a way that I could keep this from > changing every time that I reboot my computer? One you've changed resolv.conf, it should stay that way permanently across boots, unless you change it again. Open a command window in Windows and type "ipconfig -all". There should be a list of DNS servers somewhere in the output. Put that same list in your resolv.conf file. Alternately, if your ISP has given you a list of one or more DNS servers to use, put those in the resolv.conf file (usually these will both be the same). -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 04:13:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3FD16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:13:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D488543D5F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:13:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1107.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 165DC1C00097 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:13:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1107.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F356D1C00091 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:13:08 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050404041308996.F356D1C00091@mwinf1107.wanadoo.fr Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:13:08 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <588070575.20050404061308@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1823.24.118.72.147.1112563360.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> References: <1823.24.118.72.147.1112563360.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 04:13:10 -0000 Brian John writes: > I don't think so because it works fine in Windows. Wouldn't it not work > in windows if that was the case? I understood that you had changed ISP connections also. If you're using the same connection that Windows used, then it's not the ISP. Based on your other posts, it sounds like it was just a simple DNS problem. -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 04:16:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF0316A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:16:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6DD43D39 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:16:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1064773rng for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:16:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=S+t6WhA+zzmlx7ZuDvKvFpt1lYQ6XO6paH3O3Qh9NxfbIGOlbW7yHnkwtx/of/hPk8mxNLs/8qkZ1ccF5vAOS3Ix9KoqETrszKVOM665vrRGGErFM+TT4MgwBFBwaNnU5awU8sFInHURVlZkqyjAa0w/wYQZugjSpMOzkwgU7J0= Received: by 10.38.151.1 with SMTP id y1mr4885039rnd; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:16:14 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: Subject: Re: exec make buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 04:16:16 -0000 On Apr 4, 2005 6:07 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > Is it possible to do a ssh conection then do exec make buildworld on > the remote system close the conection and do a conection again later > and get the output from make buildworld again ? > Doh i forgot the important part again, without using screen :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 04:22:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FFD16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:22:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C76A43D1F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:22:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1065555rng for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:22:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rjCOUKlgCjfrc2dM6zb7fOkMicNPE4EmhM1RFvrxh4BSlBz4B8kBqnbOSLdvTY+p6XvfrlYB7o4mzdHdWtDrSkj6NjDOupUoMoMHG5jb5ZJ+wCNKqiidempMf6EbYc0OEGFvIDEfk4Vj5z+I+E8dVH36D4Iz0VmCFMlmPI1BAd4= Received: by 10.38.72.79 with SMTP id u79mr4893970rna; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:22:33 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: make installkernel error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 04:22:34 -0000 ===> usr.bin/bluetooth ===> usr.bin/bluetooth/bthost install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 bthost /usr/bin install -o root -g wheel -m 444 bthost.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1 ===> usr.bin/bluetooth/btsockstat install -s -o root -g kmem -m 2555 btsockstat /usr/bin install: kmem: Invalid argument *** Error code 67 Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/bluetooth/btsockstat. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/bluetooth. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. TB-14R From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 04:29:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F8B16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:29:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2668A43D45 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:29:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1066261rng for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:29:06 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ZAkw5aCekTMWkZqGTlBw/lFkJITQRY+g/pU741V7sAXj24+knbpV3n/mMvOByPfoCXSlC0Pi1H1KYvc0BPGGMdJpZS0RG14jNs9Qxvd94DFX4wzo4ANHBnjjvAPS5miR5ErqCUEKKKayxet5YyFV495svJYYJJoGjUA+HQJ+qBI= Received: by 10.38.12.33 with SMTP id 33mr4833026rnl; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:29:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:29:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:29:06 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: Subject: Re: make installkernel error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 04:29:07 -0000 On Apr 4, 2005 6:22 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > ===> usr.bin/bluetooth > ===> usr.bin/bluetooth/bthost > install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 bthost /usr/bin > install -o root -g wheel -m 444 bthost.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1 > ===> usr.bin/bluetooth/btsockstat > install -s -o root -g kmem -m 2555 btsockstat /usr/bin > install: kmem: Invalid argument > *** Error code 67 > > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/bluetooth/btsockstat. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/bluetooth. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > TB-14R > doh i did make install kernel instead of make installkernel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 04:55:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA7916A4CF for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:55:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hrimail.mri.ernet.in (hrimail.hri.res.in [210.212.50.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C1343D31 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:55:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from raghu@mri.ernet.in) Received: from ipc2.mri.ernet.in (unknown [192.168.3.2]) by hrimail.mri.ernet.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E14E97ECA; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:12:28 +0530 (IST) Received: from ipc2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ipc2 (Postfix) with SMTP id 67A81AD8D; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:25:03 +0530 (IST) Received: from riemann.mri.ernet.in (riemann.mri.ernet.in [192.168.3.122]) by ipc2.mri.ernet.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E7EA1B82; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:25:03 +0530 (IST) Received: from riemann.mri.ernet.in (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by riemann.mri.ernet.in (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j344utg0026475; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:26:55 +0530 (IST) (envelope-from raghu@riemann.mri.ernet.in) Received: (from raghu@localhost) by riemann.mri.ernet.in (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j344uir3026471; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:26:44 +0530 (IST) (envelope-from raghu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16976.51468.90080.3248@riemann.mri.ernet.in> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:26:44 +0530 From: "N. Raghavendra" To: Robert Slade In-Reply-To: <1112560093.15815.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> References: <1112560093.15815.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.3.1 X-Organization: Harish-Chandra Research Institute (HRI) X-Address: Chhatnag Road, Jhusi, Allahabad 211 019, India X-URL: http://www.mri.ernet.in/ X-Phone: +91 (532) 2667 509, 2667 318, 2667 578, 2567 746, 2567 747 X-Fax: +91 (532) 2667 576, 2567 748, 2567 444, 2568 036 X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0x03618806 X-OpenPGP-Key-Fingerprint: C75D D0AF 457E 7454 BEC2 37AD C6E1 0407 0361 8806 X-OpenPGP-Public-Key-Available-At: http://www.keyserver.net/ cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Rsync Setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "N. Raghavendra" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 04:55:09 -0000 At 2005-04-03T21:28:13+01:00, Robert Slade wrote: > If so, is there any other way of synchronising the 2 directories so > that they end up with the latest version of the file(s) from either > machine. The `net/unison' port may be of use to you. See http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/ Raghavendra. -- N. Raghavendra | See mail headers for contact Harish-Chandra Research Institute | and OpenPGP details. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 05:03:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32AB216A4CE; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:03:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FB543D31; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:03:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050404050324.UVHV5402.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish>; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 01:03:24 -0400 From: To: "Chris Hill" Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 01:03:24 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050403223444.S53903@frambozen.monochrome.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal cc: Randy Pratt cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: dot.icabod@gmail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: New Freebsd Install Guide Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 05:03:26 -0000 As stated in the content displayed by those URL's the Install guide is free to anyone to download and very plainly states the content is contributed to public domain. So why are so many people asking the same question when the answer is so self evident? And this writer takes offence to anybody calling the promoting of this Install guide as verbally trashing the handbook. I don't need to do that. Many others have done that over the years. Any regular reader of the list will know that the handbook content has had many people voicing concern over its less than basic ability to convey meaningful instructions. No need to open that flame war again. The bottom line is the firewall section of this Install guide has been lifted and used to replace the FreeBSD official handbook's complete firewall section all ready. Any body can lift any part of the install guide and put forth their own effort to use it as source to replace other sections of the official handbook. There is nothing stopping you so go for it. This Install guide has a much more meaningful index which is right there all the time helping the reader to navigate the guides different subjects. The presentation method of the index and content on split screen is more in line with modern web content that every ones sees these days. Plus the install Guide progresses in an step by step manner from installing the base default system all the way up to configurating a private LAN which can masquerade as a commercial user. This address the desired server configuration most often wanted by the majority the first time posters to this questions list. Another important niche this FreeBSD Install Guide covers is that it is downloadable direct to ms/window boxes and can be viewed using the ms/explorer browser. You UNIX purists have to accept the fact that there are many ms/win users who want to be FreeBSD users and dual win/FreeBSD users out there and this Install guide opens up a bridge to the FreeBSD operating system to service this untapped potential user group. Just watch the posts on the list for the magnitude of ms/office top posters to bear out that truth. The official handbook in its current format does not address this. Since its 3/1//05 public domain release this install guide has been visited 1500 times and downloaded 216 times. This was mostly from people who responded from the UNIX news groups postings. The best thing for the FreeBSD doc group to do is request to be an official mirror of the Install guide. Hay the Doc group will have the best win win situation here. They get an alternate view of the install process that is maintained outside of the FreeBSD project. Much like the pf firewall has its own self maintained user guide. Now this is something to think about. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Chris Hill Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 10:47 PM To: bob@a1poweruser.com Cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com; Randy Pratt; Giorgos Keramidas; dot.icabod@gmail.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Freebsd Install Guide Available On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > YES there is something major wrong with the official handbook. [snip] > The FreeBSD Install Guide is mirrored at the following sites. > > http://freebsd.easyasthat.co.uk/ > http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php > http://freebsd.packards-home.net/index.php > www.a1poweruser.com > http://freebsdinfo.org/ > http://freebsd.a1poweruser.com:6088/ > http://freebsd.95mb.com/ Since all of these URLs (those which respond, at least) go to essentially the same content, I have a few questions: 1) Who wrote this? 1a) Could it be Joseph Barbish? 2) Regardless, could the author be persuaded to contribute his/her wisdom to the official documentation, rather than verbally trash the latter? Persipiring minds want to know. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 05:05:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD7716A4D3 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:05:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3.server.rpi.edu (smtp3.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCC543D31 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:05:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp3.server.rpi.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3455BfO007235; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 01:05:13 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20050403233727.13570.qmail@web61310.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050403233727.13570.qmail@web61310.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 01:05:11 -0500 To: Bill Ding , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-RPI-SA-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) on 128.113.2.3 Subject: Re: how to restrict lpd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 05:05:17 -0000 At 4:37 PM -0700 4/3/05, Bill Ding wrote: >Hello, > >I am setting up some jails and have limited all the host daemons to >the host's IP except for lpd. I can't find a way of doing that. Can >it be done? I know it can in LPRng, but I prefer to install as little >software as possible on servers. I don't understand what you're asking for. There's /etc/hosts.lpd, but I assume you are talking about something else. Note that I have not done anything with jails, so that might be why I don't understand your question... -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 05:11:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605DE16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:11:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from leonis.nus.edu.sg (leonis.nus.edu.sg [137.132.1.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F269843D45 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:11:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jqdkf+dated+1113455491.2c5f69@cz3.nus.edu.sg) Received: from cactus.homeunix.org (168-220.priv21.nus.edu.sg [172.21.168.220]) by leonis.nus.edu.sg (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id j345BaZo017537 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:11:36 +0800 (SGT) Received: (qmail 49155 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Apr 2005 05:11:31 -0000 Received: by cactus.homeunix.org (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:11:31 +0800 (SGT) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:11:31 +0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050404051131.GA2270@cactus.homeunix.org> References: <200504040808.13057.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504040808.13057.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: Zeng Nan Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) Subject: Re: how to install a patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 05:11:40 -0000 --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:08:09AM +1000, Warren wrote: > I was given a patch to try out for a program, but am unsure as to how to = apply=20 > it/install it usually, under the src dir of the program, run $ patch < patchfile for details of the usage of patch, please read `man patch` --=20 Zeng Nan =20 Simple is Beautiful. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PGP Key: http://hobbit.homeunix.org --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUMyDxFSvMHT0z4kRAqkEAKCYFBzv3nxGUtmIAd57vuXFmYqGjACgodhJ +GcDa76NlH7nnkXqmfJxsI8= =NraS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 05:31:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1C816A4CF for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:31:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B0743D39 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:31:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1076990rng for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:31:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Cxlh1gIDtjrL3kTspNLs0aX4VHuT6im6bdIRdRtQtQdrM5MbjMtQZ6JB3j0YwNIboprXMCNbtYxlUXgAwGFgH+fQCY6B9D6lawVBSAJKSA14draj9kEPdIw2sly3UlhlsQLE7Xzwif/I/AEWS5zeCQ8ZrUoDUNSfzZX4UrTlP3Y= Received: by 10.38.86.68 with SMTP id j68mr4963133rnb; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:31:08 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: freebsd disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 05:31:10 -0000 Who do i ask if he / she would like to put this to the distribution list [ ] cvsupdate-nogui Cant we make some user freebsd-voting list were we can vote for changes :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 05:42:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAA216A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:42:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E8C43D31 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:42:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 23086 invoked by uid 510); 4 Apr 2005 06:44:12 +0100 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.83/710. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.7/5.0):. Processed in 3.095969 secs); 04 Apr 2005 05:44:12 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.7/5.0):. Processed in 3.095969 secs Process 23079) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 4 Apr 2005 06:44:09 +0100 From: Robert Slade To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <16976.51468.90080.3248@riemann.mri.ernet.in> References: <1112560093.15815.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <16976.51468.90080.3248@riemann.mri.ernet.in> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1112593448.22841.1.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 06:44:09 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Rsync Setup SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 05:42:29 -0000 On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 05:56, N. Raghavendra wrote: > At 2005-04-03T21:28:13+01:00, Robert Slade wrote: > > > If so, is there any other way of synchronising the 2 directories so > > that they end up with the latest version of the file(s) from either > > machine. > > The `net/unison' port may be of use to you. See > > http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/ > > Raghavendra. Thank you and all the others who replied - problem solved. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 06:42:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4DDB16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:42:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54008.mail.yahoo.com (web54008.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BF3D43D5F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:42:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 36302 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Apr 2005 06:42:36 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=irfuM6Gi+8BU0Lz3Lejj8TFJ0HIAkZEobIse1toscq6BU6IKWdRI4fVhxhpSdTdAaWCZjPKPFRBgrrSrZDcJrcxRNQumbH2gaYiCOs+dc+lK2tqyGnzMGbYrxTjuwbARK85qev7VqEs0sNI2C7fwACQzNXw1Mijs/JeU2Xtmb/E= ; Message-ID: <20050404064236.36299.qmail@web54008.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [147.46.44.181] by web54008.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:42:36 PDT Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:42:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Rob To: dannyman@toldme.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: shell stdin redirection: possible for ssh-password input? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 06:42:37 -0000 Danny Howard wrote: > > Check out expect. There's even a Perl module for > it. Expect is the bad old way we used to handle > such problems. It is this funky sub-language > designed for completing interactive sessions in > an automated way. This is exactly what I need and it works beautifully. Thanks so much! > Also, please post from a legitimate e-mail address, > in case someone were sufficiently good-natured to > hit "Reply" instead of "Reply All." It IS a legitimate email address; it may look funny, but I suppose that's allowed :). Regards, Rob. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 06:46:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0953E16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:46:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54005.mail.yahoo.com (web54005.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83A9A43D41 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:46:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 48524 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Apr 2005 06:46:01 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=rldcqHh0yjosQBOWDsjzW5qsJ3p6v1U1Wa5I+BQQji7hhG03Y6FzDJ0PQTzdkM4EbJN7cJ3LSoAdOSTp2XF2hLhiIBjkXI5eFrTpCgjnWHXkqGayQ1yV90iu7DyWAlM1dvDSQ6QdslorPNqetVBFJfsGPW1KFo97urH3dpo2ctc= ; Message-ID: <20050404064601.48522.qmail@web54005.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [147.46.44.181] by web54005.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:46:00 PDT Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:46:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Rob To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: harry@schmalzbauer.de Subject: Re: FreeBSD server behind router-NAT; how to configure sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 06:46:02 -0000 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Am Sonntag, 3. April 2005 17:36 schrieb Rob: >>There is a FAQ, that explains: >> >> If you want all outgoing SMTP connections to use >> port 2525, you can use this in your .mc file: >> >> define(`RELAY_MAILER_ARGS', `TCP $h 2525') >> define(`ESMTP_MAILER_ARGS', `TCP $h 2525') >> >>I have put this in my hostname.mc file, but to no >>avail. I'm probably not familiar enough with >>sendmail way of doing things. But then this is >>such a simple thing, that it should be easy. >> >>I suppose that with "netstat -a", there should be >>a line with port 2525, if above works. But that is >>not there. > > I'm not sure if I understand your problem correctly, > but what you did with these defines is that > sendmail contacts every other system at port 2525 > instead of 25, it's not listening on 2525, hence > you can't see a tcp/2525 with netstat -a. > > But I think it should do what you want, if I > understand your description right. If you want > sendmail to listen at a custom port these defines > are wrong. I don't have them in my mind right now, > I'm sure you'll find the M4 defines at the sendmail > FAQ, tell me if I can help. Uh? So are the rules above right or not? I'm still confused. The header of that particular FAQ was: "How do I send using an alternate port?" and that's what I want, unless my English is badly deteriorating, which I often feel like when reading sendmail manual pages :(. Anyway, let's go back to what I want sendmail to do, which is possibly a little more complicated than just shifting to another outgoing port: 1) for local delivery, i.e. users on the PC, deliver to the local mailboxes (does that need port 25?). 2) for outgoing delivery, do that over an ssh-tunnel port, e.g. over port 2525: ssh -N -f -L 2525:localhost:25 smtp.my.isp I can create the ssh-tunnel easily: telnet localhost 2525 connects me to the remote smtp server. As you may have noticed, I am a very newbie to sendmail configuration. Thanks for your help! Rob. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 07:15:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAA116A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:15:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.infinitebubble.com (pia140-70.pioneernet.net [66.114.140.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24D743D2F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:15:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@infinitebubble.com) Received: from localhost (thor.infinitebubble.com [10.10.1.1]) by mail.infinitebubble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E6834215; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 00:15:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.infinitebubble.com ([10.10.1.3]) by localhost (thor.infinitebubble.com [10.10.1.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23112-02; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 00:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.253] (unknown [192.168.1.253]) by mail.infinitebubble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686703406D; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 00:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4250EA45.6060803@infinitebubble.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 00:18:29 -0700 From: Jason Taylor User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Kevin G. Eliuk" References: <42505AB3.6090602@infinitebubble.com> <42506B78.6050309@dccnet.com> In-Reply-To: <42506B78.6050309@dccnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at infinitebubble.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Formating a 1680k floppy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 07:15:51 -0000 Kevin G. Eliuk wrote: > Jason Taylor wrote: > >> How do I format a 1680k floppy? I tried: >> >> %fdformat -s 21,,,,80 /dev/fd0 >> >> That just produces a line of errors. That is EEEE... instead of >> VVVV.... I'm able to format the same floppy in Windows using WinImage. > > > Are you sure you don't mean 1720k? Look at "/etc/disktab" for stressing > a floppy. > I'm sure. I get the same results trying to create a 1720k. %fdformat -f 1680 /dev/fd0 fdformat: unknown format 1680 KB for drive type 1.44M %fdformat -f 1720 /dev/fd0 fdformat: unknown format 1720 KB for drive type 1.44M %fdformat -s 21,,,,80 /dev/fd0 Format 1680K floppy `/dev/fd0'? (y/n): y Processing E^C-------------------------------------- %fdformat -s 21,,,,82 /dev/fd0 Format 1722K floppy `/dev/fd0'? (y/n): y Processing E^C-------------------------------------- % From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 07:33:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D17B16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:33:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.r.caley.org.uk (82-41-208-48.cable.ubr12.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.208.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A84743D54 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:33:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rjc@caley.org.uk) Received: from pele.r.caley.org.uk (pele.r.caley.org.uk [10.0.0.12]) by mail.r.caley.org.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j347XVFQ048206; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:33:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjc@caley.org.uk) Received: from pele.r.caley.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pele.r.caley.org.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j347XUPL071969; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:33:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjc@pele.r.caley.org.uk) Received: (from rjc@localhost) by pele.r.caley.org.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j347XTfW071968; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:33:29 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjc) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:33:29 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200504040733.j347XTfW071968@pele.r.caley.org.uk> From: Richard Caley To: infofarmer@mail.ru In-Reply-To: Andrew P.'s message of Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:22:07 +0400 References: <42500A1F.7080106@mail.ru> X-Dragon: Yevaud Organisation: Golden Order of the Wienerschnitzel cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: "Michael C. Shultz" cc: Fabian Keil Subject: Re: Some kind of intranet update system for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 07:33:37 -0000 > > It builds them all, but instals teh first one on this machine. > > > Would it build all the modules three time, I wonder? Seems to, but who cares? CPU cycles are cheap. I build on the machine which serves as the mail/news/dns/etc server, which is basicly idle all the time (those services just don't take a noticable amount of effort). It does the world and 4 or 5 kernels overnight, and it's only a 500MHz machine with IDE disks etc. ^_^ (O O) \_/@@\ \\~~/ ~~ - RJC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 07:35:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80C316A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:35:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr (postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FDE43D45 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:35:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vincent@vincent_bachelier.hd.free.fr) Received: from vincent_bachelier.hd.free.fr (ferreol-1-82-66-171-150.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.171.150]) by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48553C0D0 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:35:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by vincent_bachelier.hd.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A1D90C9403; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:35:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:35:32 +0200 From: Bachelier Vincent To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050404073532.GA13922@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD localhost 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE Subject: AMD64 optimization on FreeBSD 5.4 i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 07:35:35 -0000 Hi, I have a AMD64 and use FreeBSD 5.4 i386. I have set CPUTYPE=k8 to optimize a little for my computer. I have seen they set march=athlon-mp when it compile something. Ok, I have see they is a difference between march=k8 and march=athlon-mp Have a idea ? Does I compile with march=k8 under cflags ? for example: CFLAGS=-O2 -march=k8 -pipe CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS Well, what do you think ? could I optimize more than CPUTYPE=k8 ? ok see ya -- Vincent Bachelier Language : Francais / English Societ(e/y) : Solintech - http://www.solintech.fr - Serveurs linux Citation (fortune): we will invent new lullabies, new songs, new acts of love, we will cry over things we used to laugh & our new wisdom will bring tears to eyes of gentile creatures from other planets who were afraid of us till then & in the end a summer with wild winds & new friends will be. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 07:57:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4978316A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:57:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8134343D31 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:57:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 185F95641C; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:57:35 +1200 (NZST) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:57:35 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: Brian John Message-ID: <20050404075735.GA10062@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <1391.24.118.72.147.1112561507.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> <20050403231459.0ae0f091.albi@scii.nl> <42509308.9050506@fusemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42509308.9050506@fusemail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 07:57:39 -0000 On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 08:06:16PM -0500, Brian John wrote: [...] > Ok, I think you may have pointed me to the source of the problem. Here > is what my resolv.conf looks like after every time I reboot my compuer: > search domain.actdsltmp > nameserver 192.168.0.1 > nameserver 205.171.3.65 If /etc/resolv.conf changes after every reboot, I would say that either your DHCP setup is at fault or your ppp.conf set needs to be looked at. Can you be sure that your service provider isn't handing the "192.168.0.1" ip-address to you? Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen Once is dumb luck. Twice is coincidence. Three times and Somebody Is Trying To Tell You Something. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 07:59:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF0A16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:59:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC9843D41 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:59:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9DEAD5641C; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:59:56 +1200 (NZST) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:59:56 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: Gert Cuykens Message-ID: <20050404075956.GB10062@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: exec make buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 07:59:59 -0000 On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 06:16:14AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Apr 4, 2005 6:07 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > Is it possible to do a ssh conection then do exec make buildworld on > > the remote system close the conection and do a conection again later > > and get the output from make buildworld again ? > > > > Doh i forgot the important part again, without using screen :) # make buildworld >& log.file & # logout Later: # more log.file -- Jonathan Chen ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by" - Douglas Adams From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 08:13:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7D116A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:13:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F3443D41 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:13:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:13:51 +0200 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:13:51 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20050404081350.GA9048@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <20050404073532.GA13922@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050404073532.GA13922@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: Dick Hoogendijk Subject: Re: AMD64 optimization on FreeBSD 5.4 i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 08:13:52 -0000 On 04 Apr Bachelier Vincent wrote: > Does I compile with march=k8 under cflags ? > for example: CFLAGS=-O2 -march=k8 -pipe > CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS > > Well, what do you think ? > could I optimize more than CPUTYPE=k8 ? > ok see ya Don't have an answer to /your/ question, but mine is related (I think). Is it still advisable to have "-O -pipe" in /etc/make.conf? I have a duron 800. Does the "-O2" flag give more errors or is it better than using the -O? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 08:37:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB6116A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:37:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047B643D45 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:37:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [IPv6???1] (localhost.daemonsecurity.com [127.0.0.1]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C416CFD068; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:37:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4250FCC2.8080402@locolomo.org> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:37:22 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050314 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, en-gb, da, fr, de, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Francis Whittington References: <000001c538b6$4151cb50$040a000a@CTU> In-Reply-To: <000001c538b6$4151cb50$040a000a@CTU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter.log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 08:37:38 -0000 Francis Whittington wrote: > Hi guys, > I've been following this guide: > http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php > So far I have gotten the firewall/router to work. Everything seems to be okay, except I do not see anything being logged in ipfilter.log. My rc.conf options are: > > moused_enable="YES" > moused_port="/dev/psm0" > moused_type="auto" > moused_flags="-m 2=3" > allscreens_flags="-m on -c blink -h 200" > clear_tmp_enable="YES" > hostname="gateway.fbsdbuds.com" > saver="logo" > ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" > ipfilter_enable="YES" > ipfilter_rules="/etc/ipf.rules" > ipmon_enable="YES" > ipmon_flags="-Ds" > ipnat_enable="YES" > ipnat_rules="/etc/ipnat.rules" > ifconfig_rl1="inet 10.0.10.2 netmask 255.255.255.248" > gateway_enable="YES" Two things: First: You can log directly to a file instead of through syslog: ipmon_flags="-D /path/to/logfile" Second: Have you any rules in your ruleset with the "log" keyword? Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 08:40:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3766D16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:40:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FFE43D41 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:40:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [IPv6???1] (localhost.daemonsecurity.com [127.0.0.1]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4C2FD068; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:40:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4250FD5D.8070101@locolomo.org> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:39:57 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?RXJpayBOw7hyZ2FhcmQ=?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050314 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, en-gb, da, fr, de, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Juszczak References: <424F8B94.7050006@atopia.net> <424FCDD3.6040507@locolomo.org> <425030A0.4000809@atopia.net> <42503A76.20309@locolomo.org> <4250B71F.60309@atopia.net> In-Reply-To: <4250B71F.60309@atopia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFILTER and NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 08:40:06 -0000 Matt Juszczak wrote: > ---snip--- > # Default pass out > pass out quick on em0 all keep state > > # Fragmented/Short/Opts/Fprinting packets > block in quick on em0 all with ipopts > block in quick on em0 all with frag > block in quick on em0 proto tcp all with short > block in quick on em0 proto tcp all flags FUP > > # Block local nets > block in quick on em0 from 255.255.255.255/32 to any > block in quick on em0 from 192.168.0.0/16 to any > block in quick on em0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any > block in quick on em0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > block in quick on em0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any > block in quick on em0 from 0.0.0.0/32 to any > ---snip--- You haven't told a word about your network setup or server's ip, and I don't know your default rules. Your ruleset is mostly useless without that info. Have you compiled with default block? If not, then your client is open to incoming connections from almost anywhere, and if you have, then your block rules have no use. NFS is udp - I think you can force tcp, but I think this requires changes on the server also. udp is state less, so state full filtering is somewhat a guess work. It works this way for say dns: Your host sends out a udp packet with a dns request, ip-filter knows dns and so expect udp packet back within usually a minute. Now, ip-filter may not now nfs that well, or the nfs protocol may just be wierd. Since you know your nfs server, you could do: pass in quick proto udp from /32 to /32 For clarity, I suggest you write two blocks of rules, incoming and outgoing, with both tcp and udp protocols for that server. It makes it easier to see what is going on. Make sure you start your ruleset with your default rules explicit, block in log all block out log all and enable logging on _all_ block rules. Start ipmon to log to a separate file. Default rules should never match, if they do it is indication that there is something you have not taken care of. OK, this is not strictly true, but if they never match then it indicates you have written an explicit rule for each posible packet - ie. you have thought about everything. If you still have problems, submit your ipmon log file and your full tested ruleset. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 08:53:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E794716A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:53:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9337843D48 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:53:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.44] (port=3714 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DINKk-000AG3-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:53:22 +0400 Message-ID: <42510086.4000205@mail.ru> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:53:26 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dick Hoogendijk References: <20050404073532.GA13922@localhost> <20050404081350.GA9048@lothlorien.nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20050404081350.GA9048@lothlorien.nagual.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: AMD64 optimization on FreeBSD 5.4 i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 08:53:25 -0000 Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > On 04 Apr Bachelier Vincent wrote: > >>Does I compile with march=k8 under cflags ? >>for example: CFLAGS=-O2 -march=k8 -pipe >> CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS >> >>Well, what do you think ? >>could I optimize more than CPUTYPE=k8 ? > > > Don't have an answer to /your/ question, but mine is related (I think). > Is it still advisable to have "-O -pipe" in /etc/make.conf? > I have a duron 800. Does the "-O2" flag give more errors or is it better > than using the -O? To quote the Handbook: ``The optimization -O2 is much slower, and the optimization difference between -O and -O2 is normally negligible.'' The only reason one would want to use -O2 would be perfectionism, I think :) Best wishes, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 08:54:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B1016A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:54:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from istanbul.enderunix.org (freefall.marmara.edu.tr [193.140.143.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6AB143D45 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:54:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ofsen@enderunix.org) Received: (qmail 12253 invoked by uid 89); 4 Apr 2005 08:53:20 -0000 X-Mail-Scanner: Scanned by qSheff 0.8-p3 against viruses and spams (http://www.enderunix.org/qsheff/) Message-ID: <20050404085320.12250.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> From: Omer Faruk Sen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:53:20 +0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Layer7 sniffer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 08:54:13 -0000 Hi, I am looking for a software that can extract and produce HTML outputs (online and offline) of my gateway. I mean something like ntop but software should produce http statics (Who and when a http site visited and things like that) too. Since I am not going to install this on my gateway I will port mirror the traffic of my gateway to that machine. Something like sarg (for squid) maybe. Is there something like that you can advise me? I really need that. I was using ipaudit but it just gives me Layer 4 and Layer 3 traffic. ----------------------- Omer Faruk Sen http://www.EnderUNIX.ORG Software Development Team @ Turkey http://www.Faruk.NET For Public key: http://www.enderunix.org/ofsen/ofsen.asc ******************************************************** First Turkish FreeBSD book is out! Go check it. Duydunuz mu! Turkiye'nin ilk FreeBSD kitabi cikti. http://www.acikakademi.com/freebsd.php From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 08:55:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE8516A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:55:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8CD43D1D for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:55:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [IPv6???1] (localhost.daemonsecurity.com [127.0.0.1]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67261FD068; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:55:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <425100E8.40904@locolomo.org> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:55:04 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050314 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, en-gb, da, fr, de, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gert Cuykens References: <200503312003.10392.wizlayer@gmail.com> <424CFF52.10901@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: wizlayer@gmail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 08:55:12 -0000 Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Apr 1, 2005 9:59 AM, Erik Nørgaard wrote: >>As everyone else notes, this is not a job for e-mailing. Even if you >>want to e-mail the file, it is not a job for sendmail. When you send >>attachments they are typically base64 encoded, this explodes the file >>from 5.5MB to about 8MB. >> >>You can cut it up in two ways: Use transcode to make shorter clips and >>send separately or convert the file to base64, then cut it up manually >>and ask your friend to concateneate the attachments and deconvert from >>base64. >> >>The second option is the low tech - transcode is not designed to be user >>friendly. >> >>But, as everyone suggest: Setup anon ftp, an apache webserver, or give >>ssh access - all of these are faster, simpler and better. This is >>posible if you are not NAT'ed and have a reasonably fixed ip. > well i can setup a ftp but then i have to leave my pc on all the time > , people need to sleep you know and i cant sleep whith > PRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR in the background. irc wasnt made > to sent files either and look at it now , its more popular then ftp :) more popular does not mean better, just more popular. > So how do i get a movie in my friends mailbox using sentmail ? I was > thinking in de lines of sendmail -t blabla@blabla.bla -a movie.mpeg -m > hello.txt -s hello ? there is a trick you may find handy: "man mail" it tells you all about the options and stuff. Then you'll find that something along the lines 'cat movie.mpeg | mail -s "movie" recipient@somewhere' will fail, because you first have to convert your movie.mpeg to base64 and wrap the lines at every 72 characaters. But otherwise you do something like this: 'cat | mail -s "subject" recipient@somewhere' and the format of is described in rfc2822 and others, eg. the mime-stuff in rfc2045-2048+/- Read that, if you still have problems, then ask again. It still may fail because the recipient won't take large mails, so you will have to chop it of as explained in previous mail. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 09:01:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5A816A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:01:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10-winn.mailhost.ntl.com (smtpout18.mailhost.ntl.com [212.250.162.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E0D43D31 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:01:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard.danter@ntlworld.com) Received: from aamta07-winn.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.8]) by mta10-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP <20050404090149.XDQV12495.mta10-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@aamta07-winn.mailhost.ntl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:01:49 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.10] (really [82.4.184.52]) by aamta07-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP <20050404090149.YREZ10174.aamta07-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@[192.168.1.10]>; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:01:49 +0100 Message-ID: <42510277.9040303@ntlworld.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:01:43 +0100 From: Richard Danter User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050322) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RW References: <424A6E1B.3010709@ntlworld.com> <424A778F.2010804@gmail.com> <200503312112.12178.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: <200503312112.12178.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:01:52 -0000 Thanks all for the help, it is working perfectly now! Rich RW wrote: > On Wednesday 30 March 2005 10:55, Darksidex wrote: > >>Richard Danter wrote: >> >>>1. If I do "portupgrade -rR port" it will recompile the new version of >>>"port" and related ports as expected but it will also try to compile up >>>any packages that are dependent. Is there a way to tell it not to >>>upgrade packages, or to upgrade them using a new package? >> >>portupgrade -rRPP port => this will force portupgrade to use only ports > > > > > Also look at the HOLD_PKGS array in pkgtools.conf > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 09:17:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A02716A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:17:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB1743D46 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:17:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:17:19 +0200 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:17:19 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20050404091719.GA9748@lothlorien.nagual.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: Dick Hoogendijk Subject: HZ=1000 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:17:21 -0000 I read about polling and HZ=1000. The latter is not high enough for vmware3 (it complains..). I read 'man polling' and learn something about this, but I really want to know more about 'hz=1000' The GENERIC has hz=100 as I recall (fbsd-4.11). Can somebody explain I "human language" what happens if you raise this HZ? Is there a processor related issue here? What exectly happens if you have 'hz=1000' or is it maybe better to have 'hz=2000' ? I can't decide now because I don't understand what happens.. So, anybody? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 09:37:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8EC16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:37:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4412543D49 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:37:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0BF4B0F7; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:37:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:37:55 +0200 From: cpghost@cordula.ws To: Dick Hoogendijk Message-ID: <20050404093755.GA48928@epia2.farid-hajji.net> References: <20050404091719.GA9748@lothlorien.nagual.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050404091719.GA9748@lothlorien.nagual.st> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: HZ=1000 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:37:04 -0000 On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:17:19AM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > I read about polling and HZ=1000. The latter is not high enough for > vmware3 (it complains..). I read 'man polling' and learn something about > this, but I really want to know more about 'hz=1000' > > The GENERIC has hz=100 as I recall (fbsd-4.11). Can somebody explain I > "human language" what happens if you raise this HZ? Is there a processor > related issue here? What exectly happens if you have 'hz=1000' or is it > maybe better to have 'hz=2000' ? I can't decide now because I don't > understand what happens.. So, anybody? This is the frequency of the heart beat. Superficially, every 1/HZ second, a clock tick happens and the kernel is invoked. Then stuff like cleanup and scheduling a new thread happens (this is not the only time when threads get scheduled though). HZ=100 is good enough for most purposes. If the kernel needs to poll some data faster and more frequently, you can crank up HZ to 1000 or even higher. A system with higher HZ is usually also more responsive, but this comes at a price: * The overhead is higher (you need more time to do internal housekeeping, and there's less time available for userland threads) * Processor caches are flushed more frequently, resulting in slower RAM access. A high value for HZ is also not a good idea for slow(er) hardware either. Interestingly, HZ=100 has remained constant for decades (!), despite CPUs getting faster all the time. This is an excellent value for most typical usage patterns. Cranking it up should only be required for special cases. Anyway, the HZ knob is there. Experiment with it until you get optimal performance. > dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE > ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3 > + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 10:02:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD7F16A58A for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:02:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9FE43D39 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:02:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.44] (port=3816 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx1.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DIOQ3-0001C6-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:02:55 +0400 Message-ID: <425110D4.2020106@mail.ru> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:03:00 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Chen References: <20050404075956.GB10062@osiris.chen.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <20050404075956.GB10062@osiris.chen.org.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected cc: Gert Cuykens cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: exec make buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:03:00 -0000 Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 06:16:14AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote: > >>On Apr 4, 2005 6:07 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: >> >>>Is it possible to do a ssh conection then do exec make buildworld on >>>the remote system close the conection and do a conection again later >>>and get the output from make buildworld again ? >>> >> >>Doh i forgot the important part again, without using screen :) > > > # make buildworld >& log.file & > # logout It's kinda strange, but it didn't work for me yesterday. The build stopped as soon as I logged out, I used Ctrl-D instead of logout though. What I find more comfortable is # at + 1 minute make buildworld Ctrl-D Some time after I have new mail, containing all the output (stdout and stderr) from the task. That's cute. Best wishes, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 10:04:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF67516A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:04:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9241943D69 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:04:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.44] (port=3820 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx1.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DIORW-00024e-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:04:26 +0400 Message-ID: <4251112E.9040408@mail.ru> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:04:30 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gert Cuykens References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:04:29 -0000 Gert Cuykens wrote: > Who do i ask if he / she would like to put this to the distribution list > > [ ] cvsupdate-nogui > > Cant we make some user freebsd-voting list were we can vote for changes :) Come to think about it, I kinda miss this option, too. Best wishes, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 10:32:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C981416A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:32:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7808643D49 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:32:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:9874 helo=mail.aseed.antenna.nl) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DIOt3-0001OL-Ih; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:32:53 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by mail.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F7E2841A7; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:33:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (f80052.upc-f.chello.nl [80.56.80.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADE558D797; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:33:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:32:45 +0200 From: "albi@scii.nl" To: Brian John Message-Id: <20050404123245.0e84f124.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <42509308.9050506@fusemail.com> References: <1391.24.118.72.147.1112561507.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> <20050403231459.0ae0f091.albi@scii.nl> <42509308.9050506@fusemail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:32:54 -0000 On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:06:16 -0500 Brian John wrote: > Ok, I think you may have pointed me to the source of the problem. > Here is what my resolv.conf looks like after every time I reboot my > compuer: search domain.actdsltmp > nameserver 192.168.0.1 > nameserver 205.171.3.65 > > Now, if I change it to this (using my secondary DNS server from my DSL > modem's 'setup' page): > search domain.actdsltmp > nameserver 205.171.2.65 > > ...everything works. Is there a way that I could keep this from > changing every time that I reboot my computer? this looks like your DSL-modem has a router-function (with DHCP and a non-working DNS-server) or your ISP does hand out DHCP to you and something goes wrong, or your ISP does not use DHCP and something else goes wrong with the resolv.conf what you can do is to put a line in /etc/rc.local which says this cp /etc/resolv.conf.good /etc/resolv.conf where /etc/resolv.conf.good is your working resolv.conf if DHCP is in use, either on your modem or by your ISP, then there's normally a lease-time (if it's say e.g. 5 minutes, then your /etc/resolv.conf will be overwritten) so you could turn the above line into a cronjob HTH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 11:28:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0534216A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:28:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A584F43D6D for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:28:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slapinid@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so156383nzk for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 04:28:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Fhpn9aKMtD5vE8BKqUGMYGX2IPv3mBe7SEqD7qXvLKTnaL+3JkmThDrelVoips7DCa2oxsroTQ2tMOK6VTA8KTIX9wdfGLuUa55bk8fFQj3AFMJfGcT03w2tBBF486/+uMPNM79zmD9N17MSS0vR1AYvzNlrtdlohS3Dzm940Bw= Received: by 10.36.90.20 with SMTP id n20mr46999nzb; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 04:28:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.34.14 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 04:28:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48239d3905040404285e13067b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:28:31 +0400 From: Sergey Lapin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: dummynet problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sergey Lapin List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:28:33 -0000 Hi, all! Here I have a problem with dummynet. System is FreeBSD-5.3-STABLE month ago. we have very small bandwidth from LAN. rl0 is internal interface. ipfw rukes are (fwcmd=/sbin/ipfw): ${fwcmd} pipe 1 config bw 60Kbit/s ${fwcmd} add 778 pipe 1 tcp from any 25,43,53,80,110,119,123,143,953,5190 to 192.168.0.0/25 out via rl0 ${fwcmd} queue 1 config pipe 1 weight 100 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff queue 5 ${fwcmd} add 790 queue 1 log logamount 10 tcp from any to 192.168.0.99 out via rl0 ${fwcmd} queue 2 config pipe 1 weight 100 mask dst-ip 0x00000fff buckets 150 queue 10 ${fwcmd} queue 3 config pipe 1 weight 30 mask dst-ip 0x00000fff buckets 150 queue 10 ${fwcmd} queue 4 config pipe 1 weight 70 mask dst-ip 0x00000fff buckets 150 queue 10 ${fwcmd} add 791 queue 2 log logamount 10 tcp from any 5190 to 192.168.0.0/25 out via rl0 ${fwcmd} add 795 queue 3 log logamount 10 tcp from any 80,3128,21,20 to 192.168.0.0/25 out via rl0 ${fwcmd} add 792 queue 4 log logamount 10 tcp from any 25,110,43,53,119,123,143,953 to 192.168.0.0/25 out via rl0 Thanks a lot! S. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 11:54:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F1A16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:54:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao02.cox.net (lakermmtao02.cox.net [68.230.240.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF2543D64 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:54:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from dolphin.local.net ([68.11.70.216]) by lakermmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050404115405.SVFU6521.lakermmtao02.cox.net@dolphin.local.net>; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:54:05 -0400 Received: from dolphin.local.net (localhost.local.net [127.0.0.1]) by dolphin.local.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j34Bs6Vs028831; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:54:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:54:00 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: Bachelier Vincent Message-ID: <20050404065400.5df59456@dolphin.local.net> In-Reply-To: <20050404073532.GA13922@localhost> References: <20050404073532.GA13922@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; amd64-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 optimization on FreeBSD 5.4 i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:54:08 -0000 On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:35:32 +0200, Bachelier Vincent wrote: > Hi, I have a AMD64 and use FreeBSD 5.4 i386. Why aren't you using the amd64 version of FreeBSD? > I have set CPUTYPE=k8 to optimize a little for my computer. > I have seen they set march=athlon-mp when it compile something. I you were running amd64, you could use CPUTYPE=athlon64. > Ok, I have see they is a difference between march=k8 and > march=athlon-mp > > Have a idea ? Yes, download the ISO for amd64 and install it. :-) > Does I compile with march=k8 under cflags ? > for example: CFLAGS=-O2 -march=k8 -pipe > CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS I think the CXXFLAGS setting is unnecessary, as this will happen by default. > Well, what do you think ? I think you should be running amd64. :-) > could I optimize more than CPUTYPE=k8 ? Yes. See above. :-) Seriously, though, the amd64 version of FreeBSD is quite stable and usable, and would allow you to take full advantage of your machine's 64-bit architecture. Why settle for less? -- Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 11:55:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8535716A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:55:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao12.cox.net (lakermmtao12.cox.net [68.230.240.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4F043D1F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:55:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from dolphin.local.net ([68.11.70.216]) by lakermmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050404115536.QOXN2476.lakermmtao12.cox.net@dolphin.local.net>; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:55:36 -0400 Received: from dolphin.local.net (localhost.local.net [127.0.0.1]) by dolphin.local.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j34Btbt6029029; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:55:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:55:32 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: Dick Hoogendijk Message-ID: <20050404065532.040c1559@dolphin.local.net> In-Reply-To: <20050404081350.GA9048@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <20050404073532.GA13922@localhost> <20050404081350.GA9048@lothlorien.nagual.st> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; amd64-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: AMD64 optimization on FreeBSD 5.4 i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:55:42 -0000 On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:13:51 +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > > Don't have an answer to /your/ question, but mine is related (I > think). Is it still advisable to have "-O -pipe" in /etc/make.conf? > I have a duron 800. Does the "-O2" flag give more errors or is it > better than using the -O? -O2 is still iffy for certain architectures, but I believe it's OK now for i386. Go for it. :-) -- Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 12:02:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FD116A4CF for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:02:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3C143D5A for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:02:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [IPv6???1] (localhost.daemonsecurity.com [127.0.0.1]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C39FD068 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:02:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42512CD2.6080006@locolomo.org> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:02:26 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050314 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, en-gb, da, fr, de, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ssh key fingerprints X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:02:36 -0000 Hi, How do I see the fingerprints of my ssh keys, both user and host keys? I know I can get the fingerprint of the host key by removing the host from my known hosts and connecting, but there ought to be some more straight forward way, and what about the user keys? And how do I determine the key lenght from the public key file? Thanks, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 12:04:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4986916A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:04:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F114043D3F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:04:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from raykwatts@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so291909nzo for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 05:04:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QV5Kgr5msgxz00KxrWPmhRKKgYvB0ulSPdrg7zD+OsOdy5HAlrmtxQkmffhVGSgE+iHx3IOCRCtlckvfSUPMEyXmWlL1nCZSUKiITR4yfA55rnGETCfwTdEbzkE3ahDaQcUEQKLesZqIICAcNIrcUwCwLqnO6Qg9wDp+uVOmjZk= Received: by 10.36.33.8 with SMTP id g8mr60537nzg; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 05:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.39.9 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:04:28 -0400 From: Ray Watts To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: mysql 4.1 on freebsd 4.8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ray Watts List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:04:29 -0000 I have been trying to install mysql 4.1.10a on freebsd 4.8 but I get the following error: SuffFindDeps (pre-fetch) No known suffix on pre-fetch. Using .NULL suffix not adding suffix rules pre-fetch:@ = pre-fetch pre-fetch:* = pre-fetch Examining pre-fetch...non-existent...non-existent and no sources...out-of-date. pre-fetch:? = pre-fetch:> = echo "" /bin/echo: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected *** Error code 2 How to repeat: make distclean make Any ideas how to fix? thanks, -Ray Watts From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 12:17:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B804B16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:17:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E8843D1D for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:17:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pergesu@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1163685rng for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 05:17:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Op+fvrmuel1/m9RcRy6OiR6yKXSwxaIiAdQ3IGyI3aTbjf5QYEecEkI/AATvd1SnY4IR1Scjf1EzBoLtfBExAzan8PRNLZEOEizSmezds5CnEfD8a6Nt/6/6enV5b4vvU/Sh0XfcdC7rQgmOJz+wJe6SafoOdHIEDa+L5GpSQTI= Received: by 10.38.12.35 with SMTP id 35mr5188467rnl; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 05:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.42.28 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <810a540e05040405173caeb280@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:17:26 -0700 From: Pat Maddox To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: arplookup failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pat Maddox List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:17:27 -0000 I've got a system running 5.3-p6, and am getting this error every 20 minutes or so: kernel: arplookup 69.61.54.33 failed: host is not on local network I get that the host isn't on the network, but I don't have any idea where the message is coming from. It's in /var/log/messages, shows up about every 20 minutes. Any ideas? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 12:27:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8085416A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:27:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.sv-bg.com (lion.sv-bg.com [213.222.60.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E70C43D49 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:27:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lalev@sv-bg.com) Received: (qmail 78540 invoked by uid 1013); 4 Apr 2005 15:42:54 -0000 Received: from lalev@sv-bg.com by www.sv-bg.com by uid 1010 with qmail-scanner-1.22-st-qms Clear:RC:0(213.222.60.195):SA:0(-2.6/5.0):. Processed in 8.583097 secs); 04 Apr 2005 15:42:54 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: lalev@sv-bg.com via www.sv-bg.com X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.22-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(213.222.60.195):SA:0(-2.6/5.0):. Processed in 8.583097 secs Process 78527) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.20?) (lalev@sv-bg.com@213.222.60.195) by mail.sv-bg.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2005 15:42:46 -0000 Message-ID: <42515CCE.1070505@sv-bg.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:27:10 +0000 From: Angelin Lalev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= References: <424E8FE9.1090904@sv-bg.com> <424F1029.6080600@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <424F1029.6080600@locolomo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:27:27 -0000 Thank You very much! > Well, the short answer is: there is no keep state in the line > > pass in quick on rl0 all > > the dns reply you get back times out because your default rule is > block and there is nowhere in the "in" rules for rl1 that allows the > reply back. > This makes sense... And I probably have done huge mistake... I thought that these rules are applied two times - once when the packet is about to enter "routing logic" and once when it exits "routing logic" the machine and once when the packet exits the machine (like ipfw). If that was the case the rule pass out quick on rl1 all keep state would do... > Some recomendations: > > 1) I have a bit of dificulty understanding your network setup - why do > you have two private networks on your external interface? May scetch > in a diagram. rl0 is connected to an internet caffe with some game servers. It has only one IP address 192.168.0.0/24. rl1 is connected via ethernet to a wireless bridge. The management address of the wireless bridge (provider's property) is 10.1.6.1. I added alias addr. 10.1.6.2/24 to the rl1, so I can ping it to test connectivity. Recently we have connected some outer clients to the same ethernet network on wich is the wireless bridge. They have addresses 192.168.5.0/24 and have for gateway the our freebsd machine. They use squid server on the machine (like the machines on rl0 do) and need access to some game servers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 12:39:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A1216A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:39:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2687943D5C for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:39:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gjbailey@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so52758wra for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 05:39:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZA3PkTqS+lmBrl4/k04B8MLGfX/uowjuohi7ZA/epXwjuzLUf6EhzRTmL/fnAiUYHCLCjQqOBXabXH464eWPPTd6n61JNoNAST+bfwHDN4m2a2D9JNRE3IpHsazWvle7me46aKD4zHXb7Su2R0iq0ggDPOwNfW4dTgco5KUPE84= Received: by 10.54.31.37 with SMTP id e37mr250433wre; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 05:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.83.20 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48a5f32a05040405393061ec68@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:39:33 +0200 From: Gareth Bailey To: freebsd-questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Will Sempron 754 run with FreeBSD i386? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gareth Bailey List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:39:34 -0000 I just got a Sempron 754, will it run under FreeBSD 4.11 i386? I don't have time to reinstall the OS, so if the 754 doesn't run on i386 i'll swop the chip for a socket A. ... or will the 754 be substantially quicker that the equivalent speed Socket A? The machine is being used as a development server. Thanks for your advice Gareth From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 12:46:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF78116A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:46:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A8143D45 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:46:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.44] (port=4136 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx1.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DIQyO-000NZa-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:46:32 +0400 Message-ID: <4251372E.8040602@mail.ru> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:46:38 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gareth Bailey References: <48a5f32a05040405393061ec68@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <48a5f32a05040405393061ec68@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Will Sempron 754 run with FreeBSD i386? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:46:35 -0000 Gareth Bailey wrote: > I just got a Sempron 754, will it run under FreeBSD 4.11 i386? Yes, sure > I don't have time to reinstall the OS, so if the 754 doesn't run on > i386 i'll swop the chip for a socket A. > > ... or will the 754 be substantially quicker that the equivalent speed > Socket A? Not really, no > The machine is being used as a development server. > > Thanks for your advice > > Gareth From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 12:48:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9514816A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:48:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4229C43D45 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:48:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.44] (port=4138 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DIR0P-000Cv4-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:48:37 +0400 Message-ID: <425137AA.8090401@mail.ru> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:48:42 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pat Maddox References: <810a540e05040405173caeb280@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <810a540e05040405173caeb280@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: arplookup failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:48:39 -0000 Pat Maddox wrote: > I've got a system running 5.3-p6, and am getting this error every 20 > minutes or so: > kernel: arplookup 69.61.54.33 failed: host is not on local network > > I get that the host isn't on the network, but I don't have any idea > where the message is coming from. It's in /var/log/messages, shows up > about every 20 minutes. Any ideas? Maybe a direct route to that host is specified in your routing table. Provide the output of `netstat -rn` please. Best wishes, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 12:52:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD3116A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:52:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fri.itea.ntnu.no (fri.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.7.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E776D43D3F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:52:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fri.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9458E829E for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:52:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maren.thelosingend.net (maren.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.48]) by fri.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:52:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 71075 invoked by uid 1001); 4 Apr 2005 12:52:09 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Apr 2005 12:52:09 -0000 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:52:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen X-X-Sender: sveinhal@maren.thelosingend.net To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= In-Reply-To: <42512CD2.6080006@locolomo.org> Message-ID: <20050404145001.R71005@maren.thelosingend.net> References: <42512CD2.6080006@locolomo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1174496699-1112619129=:71005" X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ssh key fingerprints X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:52:30 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1174496699-1112619129=:71005 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE * Erik N=F8rgaard [2005-04-04 14:02 +0200] > How do I see the fingerprints of my ssh keys, both user and host keys? Excerpt from man ssh-keygen(1) SYNOPSIS ssh-keygen -l [-f input_keyfile] -l Show fingerprint of specified public key file. Private RSA1 k= eys are also supported. For RSA and DSA keys ssh-keygen tries to find the matching public key file and prints its fingerprint. --0-1174496699-1112619129=:71005-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 13:03:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417AD16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:03:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fuse1.fusemail.net (smtp.fusemail.net [69.31.1.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B0343D1F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:03:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brianjohn@fusemail.com) Received: from fusemail.com by fuse1.fusemail.net with asmtp (FuseMail extSMTP) id 1DIREz-0003G8-Kf; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 08:03:41 -0500 Received: from 209.87.176.4 (FuseMail web AccountID 19592) by webmail.fusemail.com with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:03:45 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4529.209.87.176.4.1112619825.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:03:45 -0500 (CDT) From: "Brian John" To: "Jonathan Chen" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: FuseMail W MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: brianjohn@fusemail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:03:46 -0000 > On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 08:06:16PM -0500, Brian John wrote: > > [...] > > Ok, I think you may have pointed me to the source of the problem. Here > > is what my resolv.conf looks like after every time I reboot my compuer: > > search domain.actdsltmp > > nameserver 192.168.0.1 > > nameserver 205.171.3.65 > > If /etc/resolv.conf changes after every reboot, I would say that either > your DHCP setup is at fault or your ppp.conf set needs to be looked > at. Can you be sure that your service provider isn't handing the > "192.168.0.1" ip-address to you? > > Cheers. > -- > Jonathan Chen Once is dumb luck. > Twice is coincidence. > Three times and Somebody Is Trying To Tell You Something. > The 192.168.0.1 address is the ip address of my dsl modem. Should that be counted as a dns server? Where does my DHCP setup live? What should I see in ppp.conf? Thanks /Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 13:30:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A74416A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:30:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web90206.mail.scd.yahoo.com (web90206.mail.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.94.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D581743D49 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:30:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kenneth_a_bond@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 37196 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Apr 2005 13:30:30 -0000 Message-ID: <20050404133030.37194.qmail@web90206.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Received: from [170.252.248.194] by web90206.mail.scd.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:30:30 EDT Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:30:30 -0400 (EDT) From: "Kenneth A. Bond" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Keeping installed packages up to date X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:30:31 -0000 Hello, I am a relatively new BSD user, making the move from various Linux distros such as Debian GNU Linux. I have been running Linux servers for quite some time in a production environment, but based on recent events in the Linux world, have made the decision to move to FreeBSD. I have made the move to FreeBSD due to its maturity, stability and performance, not to mention that extended releases are supported for two years from their release, which is attractive in a mission-critical environment. I am trying to determine the best method of keeping my installed packages up-to-date. My current environment does not permit me to use CVSUP for synching my ports tree (due to firewall constraints) so I have been simply downloading the ports.tar.gz file from ftp.freebsd.org. I have followed the steps outlined in Richard Bejtlich's document Keeping FreeBSD Applications Up-To-Date (http://www.taosecurity.com/keeping_freebsd_applications_up-to-date.html) but I run into an issue where a number of installed packages are either skipped or fail during portupgrade. My update process is as follows: -Download port.tar.gz from ftp.freebsd.org -Extract to /usr -cd /usr/ports -make fetchindex -portsdb -u -portversion -v -l "<" -Check /usr/ports/UPDATING for information relating to my applications -portupgrade -varR or portupgrade -varRPP My question is: is there an easier way of updating my installed packages? The process described above is incredibly time-consuming. I would like to know if there is a less time consuming method, since I have managers foaming at the mouth for my servers to be up and online with the latest updates, as soon as possible. Please advise. Thank you for your assistance. KB ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 13:33:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A7E16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:33:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB2B43D46 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:32:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.44] (port=4405 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DIRhL-000E9p-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:32:59 +0400 Message-ID: <42514210.2010509@mail.ru> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:33:04 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gareth Bailey References: <48a5f32a05040405393061ec68@mail.gmail.com> <4251372E.8040602@mail.ru> <48a5f32a05040406045d5a3e15@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <48a5f32a05040406045d5a3e15@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will Sempron 754 run with FreeBSD i386? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:33:00 -0000 Gareth Bailey wrote: > Thanks. Can anyone else comment on the following points?: > > The 754 Sempron: > > - Will run in FreeBSD 4.11 i386? > - Will not be faster than Sempron socket A? > > Thanks > > Gareth I think you forgot to cc this message to freebsd-questions. Anyways, to further comment on these issues: Sempron cores are identical in Socket A and Socket 754 versions. Both support only 32-bit instruction sets (i686 in terms of CPUTYPE and i386 in terms of MACHINE). Any x86 OS will run on Sempron/754 smoothly. Personally, I think it's a much better choice than Celeron D. Sempron/754 might be a little faster than it's Socket A version - but that's _only_ because of the chipsets for Socket 754 are more advanced than Socket A ones. I would generally recommend using Sempron/754, as you could upgrade to Athlon 64 later and FreeBSD/x64 then. On the other hand, s754 will be deprecated in a few years in favour of s939. Best wishes, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 13:37:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862C416A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:37:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD0543D1F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:37:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from somniosus@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1187049rng for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 06:37:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=pvG5FptHzwqnZtk3sdH1Pjt9SfEdYl6DmNk8PJ7cJ+Q43hQ5StyPre/ZUtRLwTrA9UseeIoUi9PvXHyaB5tjZENx+OlTDg9pLYY1e7kCbuQcBjCO+TZvRT25EZ7vfX5pxpJfhHNvWrIEKgNVGm6/HpGn7nD2g54wt2Vh9ySYC80= Received: by 10.38.86.68 with SMTP id j68mr5298029rnb; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 06:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.14.34 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:37:15 -0700 From: cape canaveral To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <583804515.20050404061243@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1391.24.118.72.147.1112561507.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> <42509308.9050506@fusemail.com> <583804515.20050404061243@wanadoo.fr> Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: cape canaveral List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:37:16 -0000 On Apr 3, 2005 9:12 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > One you've changed resolv.conf, it should stay that way permanently > across boots, unless you change it again. > dhclient will overwrite /etc/resolv.conf on boot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 13:44:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0049616A4CE; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:44:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBAA43D2D; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:44:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rpratt1950@earthlink.net) Received: from [65.41.159.229] (helo=kt.weeble.com) by smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DIRsu-0005Ro-Jr; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:44:56 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=test1; d=earthlink.net; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=XfnlJcqdtpYZoSLnTNKGRwKaAH/nDxoqG0jLwnv1ulyDbTbtugxFqNGfK0i/FGyK; Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:44:54 -0400 From: Randy Pratt To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050404094454.6dfc68be.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20050403223444.S53903@frambozen.monochrome.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 96132b9c1759af1df21c5f5255d6c174239a348a220c2609f4b28be77d5b2a8a35addc2e470059af666fa475841a1c7a350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 65.41.159.229 cc: keramida@freebsd.org cc: dot.icabod@gmail.com Subject: Re: New Freebsd Install Guide Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:44:58 -0000 On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 01:03:24 -0400 wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Chris Hill > Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 10:47 PM > To: bob@a1poweruser.com > Cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com; Randy Pratt; Giorgos Keramidas; > dot.icabod@gmail.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: New Freebsd Install Guide Available > > On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > > > YES there is something major wrong with the official handbook. > > [snip] > > > The FreeBSD Install Guide is mirrored at the following sites. > > > > http://freebsd.easyasthat.co.uk/ > > http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php > > http://freebsd.packards-home.net/index.php > > www.a1poweruser.com > > http://freebsdinfo.org/ > > http://freebsd.a1poweruser.com:6088/ > > http://freebsd.95mb.com/ > > Since all of these URLs (those which respond, at least) go to > essentially the same content, I have a few questions: 1) Who wrote > this? > 1a) Could it be Joseph Barbish? 2) Regardless, could the author be > persuaded to contribute his/her wisdom to the official > documentation, > rather than verbally trash the latter? > > Persipiring minds want to know. Oops.. You're absolutely right Chris, it is the same: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040308154441.GA73721 I didn't recognize the poster as the one who created that document and tried to peddle it for money last year. It was another of those never-ending threads so rather than pollute the list lets just drop this. Its just not worth the time or bandwidth. My apologies to the list. I will be more careful in the future. Best regards, Randy -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 14:02:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8F416A4CE; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:02:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E6C43D31; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:02:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id j34E1Wr00485; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:01:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200504041401.j34E1Wr00485@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: bob@a1poweruser.com Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:01:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: from "bob@a1poweruser.com" at Apr 04, 2005 01:03:24 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Randy Pratt cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: dot.icabod@gmail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Freebsd Install Guide Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:02:12 -0000 > > As stated in the content displayed by those URL's the Install guide > is free to anyone to download and very plainly states the content is > contributed to public domain. > So why are so many people asking the same question when the answer > is so self evident? > > And this writer takes offence to anybody calling the promoting of > this Install guide as verbally trashing the handbook. > I don't need to do that. Many others have done that over the years. > Any regular reader of the list will know that the handbook content > has had many people voicing concern over its less than basic > ability to convey meaningful instructions. No need to open that > flame war again. Well, both types of documentation are needed. The official formal documentation, which, of necessity , needs to be written in a rather formal language style and other explanitory docs for newbies and those of us who need a more conversational and step by step style at least to get started at things. There are several good books out with more conversational style and some reasonable web sites with tutorials. The only problem with many of the web sites and even the books is that they tend to take a personal preference prejucidial attitude toward things rather than encouraging readers to try out various things and giving them instruction toward those other choices. Some examples are installing and using Gnome. To read some guides, one would think it is impossible to run FreeBSD without Gnome. Some seem to imply it is absolutely necessary to install a third party MBR/boot manager such as Grub to boot FreeBSD, just because they like it. Some tend to think the only possible shell to use is bash or sh and anyone using something else can't possibly get their work done. The list could go on. But, in spite of that, the "third party" guides are useful and helpful. Just realize that, even more than the official handbook, they represent personally unique situations, opinions and preferences as well as useful information. > ... much excised. > > Another important niche this FreeBSD Install Guide covers is that it > is downloadable direct to ms/window boxes and can be viewed using > the ms/explorer browser. You UNIX purists have to accept the fact > that there are many ms/win users who want to be FreeBSD users and > dual win/FreeBSD users out there and this Install guide opens up a > bridge to the FreeBSD operating system to service this untapped > potential user group. Just watch the posts on the list for the > magnitude of ms/office top posters to bear out that truth. The > official handbook in its current format does not address this. Since > its 3/1//05 public domain release this install guide has been > visited 1500 times and downloaded 216 times. This was mostly from > people who responded from the UNIX news groups postings. I don't understand - the handbook is available online to any web browser, including ms exploder. Anyway, anything that helps people use FreeBSD is good. ////jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 14:27:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5B916A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:27:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc14.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [216.148.227.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C134343D46 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:27:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antonzav@cocmast.net) Received: from workstation (unknown[67.188.34.32](misconfigured sender)) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with SMTP id <2005040414270301400ahs85e>; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:27:03 +0000 From: "Anton Zavrin" To: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:27:00 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 thread-index: AcU5Il0xsw2g0Jp0T8Gl6GYHdWNLOg== Message-Id: <20050404142701.C134343D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: mpd VPN Server / W2K Clients X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:27:02 -0000 Hello Jonathan, I found this thread from a long time ago at FreeBSD addicts: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2003-December/027869.ht ml I'm having absolutely identical problem with my MPD (it used to work and then it just stopped, who knows why). I tried to follow up on that solution you posted, but that page no longer opens up. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thank you much! -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 4/1/2005 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 14:40:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD47A16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:40:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fuse1.fusemail.net (smtp.fusemail.net [69.31.1.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816AA43D5C for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:40:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brianjohn@fusemail.com) Received: from fusemail.com by fuse1.fusemail.net with asmtp (FuseMail extSMTP) id 1DISkj-0001l2-B0; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:40:33 -0500 Received: from 209.87.176.4 (FuseMail web AccountID 19592) by webmail.fusemail.com with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:40:37 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <1523.209.87.176.4.1112625637.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:40:37 -0500 (CDT) From: "Brian John" To: "cape canaveral" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: FuseMail W MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: brianjohn@fusemail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:40:38 -0000 > On Apr 3, 2005 9:12 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > > > One you've changed resolv.conf, it should stay that way permanently > > across boots, unless you change it again. > > > > > dhclient will overwrite /etc/resolv.conf on boot How can I keep dhclient from doing this? /Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 14:50:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4161D16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:50:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E8743D48 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:50:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gjbailey@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so79592wra for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 07:50:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=dpeDnSCwmJSS60ZOzpl5luMDHDe0yngkosfgfSkizrLko4Z+CS8nGziLDANGPkfz0VE51Fzk379d7woRg0J39TFeXN65JEL2nD1lcVyr/jNIFzjcjQ2e40dzz01/sKrCbZsR7U1Maj3Y6QCFI1vnrLQS0OobDKMm3ticV1A+Aow= Received: by 10.54.32.67 with SMTP id f67mr373558wrf; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 07:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.83.20 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48a5f32a05040407501ccf0775@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:50:26 +0200 From: Gareth Bailey To: infofarmer@mail.ru, freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <42514210.2010509@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <48a5f32a05040405393061ec68@mail.gmail.com> <48a5f32a05040406045d5a3e15@mail.gmail.com> <42514210.2010509@mail.ru> Subject: Re: Will Sempron 754 run with FreeBSD i386? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gareth Bailey List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:50:29 -0000 Thanks for the info Andrew. Much appreciated, Gareth On Apr 4, 2005 3:33 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > Gareth Bailey wrote: > > Thanks. Can anyone else comment on the following points?: > > > > The 754 Sempron: > > > > - Will run in FreeBSD 4.11 i386? > > - Will not be faster than Sempron socket A? > > > > Thanks > > > > Gareth > > I think you forgot to cc this message to > freebsd-questions. Anyways, to further > comment on these issues: > > Sempron cores are identical in Socket A and > Socket 754 versions. Both support only 32-bit > instruction sets (i686 in terms of CPUTYPE > and i386 in terms of MACHINE). Any x86 OS > will run on Sempron/754 smoothly. Personally, > I think it's a much better choice than Celeron D. > > Sempron/754 might be a little faster than > it's Socket A version - but that's _only_ > because of the chipsets for Socket 754 are > more advanced than Socket A ones. I would > generally recommend using Sempron/754, as > you could upgrade to Athlon 64 later and > FreeBSD/x64 then. On the other hand, s754 > will be deprecated in a few years in favour > of s939. > > Best wishes, > Andrew P. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 14:51:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A000716A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:51:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web42110.mail.yahoo.com (web42110.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 686D343D45 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:51:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from blesets@yahoo.com.au) Received: (qmail 80107 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Apr 2005 14:51:50 -0000 Message-ID: <20050404145150.80105.qmail@web42110.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [61.5.113.117] by web42110.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:51:50 EST Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:51:50 +1000 (EST) From: Andre Nas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Sysinstall in Xterm in color ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:51:50 -0000 Dear, How to make sysinstall menu in xterm have origin color (blue yellow) not black and white. I read a termcap and xterm-color but i could't understand (sorry im newbie) Thank U Andre --------------------------------- Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 15:04:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DAA16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:04:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1C943D54 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:03:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olafvdspek@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1454455wri for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 08:03:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ove0Pn7SUbF5W/VgcpaEfn0s4nIGPzcWiz57YhhN9DX9GLsS1DNfKp34ATvlymSLqO9Ss737kbWB+7mVakqHDHd+p7RQw188xJQeKxEXy4uZpCdjf1xlRonyr5uMvl1ahseVbqUiX2wuvtGU2hbKnEFAYY+/83ffwsxeOtSQc6g= Received: by 10.54.53.67 with SMTP id b67mr353131wra; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 08:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.49.66 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:03:58 +0200 From: Olaf van der Spek To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <42514210.2010509@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <48a5f32a05040405393061ec68@mail.gmail.com> <48a5f32a05040406045d5a3e15@mail.gmail.com> <42514210.2010509@mail.ru> Subject: Re: Will Sempron 754 run with FreeBSD i386? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Olaf van der Spek List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:04:01 -0000 On Apr 4, 2005 3:33 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > Gareth Bailey wrote: > > Thanks. Can anyone else comment on the following points?: > > > > The 754 Sempron: > > > > - Will run in FreeBSD 4.11 i386? > > - Will not be faster than Sempron socket A? > > > > Thanks > > > > Gareth > > I think you forgot to cc this message to > freebsd-questions. Anyways, to further > comment on these issues: > > Sempron cores are identical in Socket A and > Socket 754 versions. Both support only 32-bit Are you sure? The s754 versions have an on die memory controller and a K8 core (although with disabled 64-bit mode), which should make it significantly faster then the K7 based Sempron on sA. > instruction sets (i686 in terms of CPUTYPE > and i386 in terms of MACHINE). Any x86 OS > will run on Sempron/754 smoothly. Personally, > I think it's a much better choice than Celeron D. > > Sempron/754 might be a little faster than > it's Socket A version - but that's _only_ > because of the chipsets for Socket 754 are > more advanced than Socket A ones. I would > generally recommend using Sempron/754, as > you could upgrade to Athlon 64 later and > FreeBSD/x64 then. On the other hand, s754 > will be deprecated in a few years in favour > of s939. Even for Sempron? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 15:09:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD48D16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:09:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DBD43D5A for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:09:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (63-225-97-116.dnvr.qwest.net[63.225.97.116]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20050404150915015000krvre>; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:09:15 +0000 From: Aaron Siegel To: racerx@makeworld.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:10:19 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050403094953.5269.qmail@web51110.mail.yahoo.com> <200504030919.05069.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> <42500AF0.7060901@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <42500AF0.7060901@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504040910.20461.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> Subject: Re: Sound problem ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: aj@siegel-tech.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:09:18 -0000 Chris The /boot/defaults/loader.conf contains the defaults configurations and the /boot/loader.conf contains your custom configurations. It is the same a rc.conf and make.conf. You should never change any of the files in the default directory, this is why they are not writeable. When you perform an upgrade, the default files are replaced with the new file from the upgrade. So after an upgrade you will loose all the changes you made in the files contained in the defaults directories, and will have to reconfigure all those settings. The /etc/rc.conf, /etc/make.conf, and /boot/loader.conf are not edited in the upgrade process so you will maintain all your configurations. You must create the /boot/loader file and add the appropriate lines to that file. In summary, do not make changes to the files in the defaults directory, /boot/defaults and /etc/defaults. Aaron Siegel On Sunday 03 April 2005 09:25, Chris wrote: > > While most of what you say is correct, and I have opted to use > loader.conf for sound, this file is actually in /boot/defaults/loader.conf > > By default, /boot/loader.conf is either non-existant, or has very little > in it. > > Telling the OP to look in /boot/loader.conf for the lines above will > confuse him/her. > > In general, /boot/defaults/loader.conf is a great place to start. Much > like /etc/defaults - these are set as the system defaults. putting the > lines you want in /boot/loader.conf over rides the system defaults. > > Also worth noting (as with /etc/defaults) the user ought to get into the > habit of editing the proper files instead of the system default files. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 15:31:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCB116A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:31:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com (smtpout15.mailhost.ntl.com [212.250.162.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A3443D55 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:31:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard.danter@ntlworld.com) Received: from aamta01-winn.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.8]) by mta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP <20050404153133.CBZT12099.mta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@aamta01-winn.mailhost.ntl.com> for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:31:33 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.10] (really [82.4.184.52]) by aamta01-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP <20050404153133.VNHB1187.aamta01-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@[192.168.1.10]> for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:31:33 +0100 Message-ID: <42515DCE.2010207@ntlworld.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:31:26 +0100 From: Richard Danter User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050322) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: portupgrade failing on firefox and thunderbird X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:31:46 -0000 Hi all, I am trying to update my installations of firefox and thunderbird. I have done this several times in the past with no problems but lately I get the following errors (see below). Anyone else seeing this? I can update other ports just fine... Thanks Rich # portupgrade -rR firefox ---> Upgrading 'firefox-1.0.1_3,1' to 'firefox-1.0.2,1' (www/firefox) ---> Building '/usr/ports/www/firefox' ===> Cleaning for atk-1.9.1 ===> Cleaning for unzip-5.52_1 ===> Cleaning for zip-2.3_2 ===> Cleaning for libiconv-1.9.2_1 ===> Cleaning for bison-1.75_2 ===> Cleaning for desktop-file-utils-0.10_2 ===> Cleaning for gettext-0.14.1 ===> Cleaning for glib-2.6.3_1 ===> Cleaning for gmake-3.80_2 ===> Cleaning for imake-6.8.2 ===> Cleaning for libIDL-0.8.5_1 ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.3.5_2 ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.5.10_1 ===> Cleaning for m4-1.4.1 ===> Cleaning for pkgconfig-0.15.0_1 ===> Cleaning for popt-1.7 ===> Cleaning for jpeg-6b_3 ===> Cleaning for lcms-1.14,1 ===> Cleaning for libmng-1.0.8 ===> Cleaning for png-1.2.8_1 ===> Cleaning for tiff-3.7.1_2 ===> Cleaning for perl-5.8.6_2 ===> Cleaning for gnomehier-2.0_6 ===> Cleaning for hicolor-icon-theme-0.5 ===> Cleaning for shared-mime-info-0.16_1 ===> Cleaning for freetype2-2.1.9 ===> Cleaning for expat-1.95.8 ===> Cleaning for intltool-0.33 ===> Cleaning for libxml2-2.6.19 ===> Cleaning for p5-XML-Parser-2.34_1 ===> Cleaning for bitstream-vera-1.10_1 ===> Cleaning for fontconfig-2.2.3,1 ===> Cleaning for libXft-2.1.6_1 ===> Cleaning for xorg-fonts-encodings-6.8.2 ===> Cleaning for xorg-fonts-truetype-6.8.2 ===> Cleaning for gtk-2.6.4_1 ===> Cleaning for pango-1.8.1 ===> Cleaning for xorg-clients-6.8.2 ===> Cleaning for xorg-libraries-6.8.2 ===> Cleaning for xterm-200_2 ===> Cleaning for firefox-1.0.2,1 ===> Found saved configuration for firefox-1.0.1_2,1 ===> Extracting for firefox-1.0.2,1 => Checksum mismatch for firefox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2. ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: firefox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2 ===> Found saved configuration for firefox-1.0.1_2,1 => firefox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/relea ses/1.0.2/source/. fetch: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.0.2/source/fire fox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2: Unknown error: 0 => Attempting to fetch from http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/mozilla.org/firef ox/releases/1.0.2/source/. fetch: firefox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2: local modification time does not match remo te => Attempting to fetch from http://mozilla.gnusoft.net/firefox/releases/1.0.2/so urce/. fetch: http://mozilla.gnusoft.net/firefox/releases/1.0.2/source/firefox-1.0.2-so urce.tar.bz2: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releas es/1.0.2/source/. fetch: firefox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2: local modification time does not match remo te => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.belnet.be/packages/mozilla/firefox/release s/1.0.2/source/. fetch: firefox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2: local modification time does not match remo te => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.fh-wolfenbuettel.de/pub/www/mozilla/firefo x/releases/1.0.2/source/. fetch: firefox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2: local modification time does not match remo te => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.uni-bayreuth.de/pub/packages/netscape/mozi lla/firefox/releases/1.0.2/source/. fetch: firefox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2: local modification time does not match remo te => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/mirror/ftp.m ozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/1.0.2/source/. fetch: firefox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2: local modification time does not match remo te => Attempting to fetch from ftp://www.t.ring.gr.jp/pub/net/www/mozilla/firefox/r eleases/1.0.2/source/. fetch: firefox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2: local modification time does not match remo te => Attempting to fetch from http://www.t.ring.gr.jp/archives/net/www/mozilla/fir efox/releases/1.0.2/source/. fetch: firefox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2: local modification time does not match remo te => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.rediris.es/mirror/mozilla/firefox/releases /1.0.2/source/. fetch: firefox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2: local modification time does not match remo te => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.kaist.ac.kr/pub/mozilla/firefox/releases/1 .0.2/source/. fetch: firefox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2: local modification time does not match remo te => Attempting to fetch from ftp://mozilla.mirror.pacific.net.au/mozilla/firefox/ releases/1.0.2/source/. fetch: ftp://mozilla.mirror.pacific.net.au/mozilla/firefox/releases/1.0.2/source /firefox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access ) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.chg.ru/pub/WWW/mozilla/firefox/releases/1. 0.2/source/. fetch: firefox-1.0.2-source.tar.bz2: local modification time does not match remo te => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/firefox-1.0.2-source.ta r.bz2: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade61071.28 ma ke ** Fix the problem and try again. ---> Skipping 'www/mplayer-plugin' (mplayerplug-in-2.80_2) because a requisite package 'firefox-1.0.1_3,1' (www/firefox) failed (specify -k to force) ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! www/firefox (firefox-1.0.1_3,1) (checksum mismatch) * www/mplayer-plugin (mplayerplug-in-2.80_2) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 28 ignored, 1 skipped and 1 failed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 15:58:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF3E16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:58:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57EF443D67 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:58:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pwaring@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1235367rng for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 08:58:54 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Se4HZ/k/Lna6hVtjbUCFW2zqj9x5oqxc5PyiQNEQN4qr2+8lH+h0BAKNWz6GvgsuVg0ru+hbFQvtaeggA7hchU7V8IzBz/oLPjiQwqHeVfyErE+yqy1kAAIUOIzeWDpjI2aNOuWJvvkuVyUd0j/tHxJJz0kA+XAAZXU0AEAWyqg= Received: by 10.38.13.39 with SMTP id 39mr5385624rnm; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 08:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.76.66 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8953a1db05040408585b44baed@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:58:54 +0100 From: Paul Waring To: Richard Danter In-Reply-To: <42515DCE.2010207@ntlworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <42515DCE.2010207@ntlworld.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade failing on firefox and thunderbird X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Waring List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:58:56 -0000 On Apr 4, 2005 4:31 PM, Richard Danter wrote: > I am trying to update my installations of firefox and thunderbird. I > have done this several times in the past with no problems but lately I > get the following errors (see below). Anyone else seeing this? I can > update other ports just fine... I had this problem last night with upgrading python, I found running: cvsup /usr/ports/supfile again and then running portupgrade python fixed things. No idea why, best idea I can think of is that one of the files got corrupted during transfer or there was network timeout on my end. Obviously substitute /usr/ports/supfile for the location of your supfile. :) Paul -- Rogue Tory www.roguetory.org.uk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 16:03:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C75116A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:03:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E6B43D54 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:03:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DITzL-0003SD-F6 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:59:43 +0200 Received: from pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net ([68.83.169.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:59:43 +0200 Received: from apeiron+usenet by pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:59:43 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christopher Nehren Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Organization: /usr/bin/false Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <42515DCE.2010207@ntlworld.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: portupgrade failing on firefox and thunderbird X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:03:22 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-04-04, Richard Danter scribbled these curious markings: > Hi all, > > I am trying to update my installations of firefox and thunderbird. I > have done this several times in the past with no problems but lately I > get the following errors (see below). Anyone else seeing this? I can > update other ports just fine... Remove the firefox tarball from /usr/ports/distfiles and try again. Best Regards, Christopher Nehren -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUWRSk/lo7zvzJioRAlwxAKCeeQZ59kj/bLWL1NMz5v5nRqrKxQCdEW9h U+5cMkz0/eWKrxbaBj4VMS4= =UdPL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson If you ask the wrong questions, you get answers like "42" and "God". Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 16:04:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CB116A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:04:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ajax.cnchost.com (ajax.cnchost.com [207.155.248.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9A843D1F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:04:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@arconassoc.com) Received: from system13 (ip67-153-59-26.z59-153-67.customer.algx.net [67.153.59.26]) by ajax.cnchost.com id MAA03763; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:04:29 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: From: "Chris Nye" Organization: ARCON Associatiates To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:03:33 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <42511F05.20588.1508C11@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Subject: xoasis hell PANIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:04:30 -0000 my xoasis box rolled over & died sat mail & web server down so have been trying to get it online for last 6 hrs. system rebooted itself and I came in to screen to run fsck manually. I did and it ran till lost+found fills up. I manually mount with -fw and delete folder with rm-r restart fsck and it finishs but autoanswers No so I rebott the bos and it runs again till the folders fills up. Am I del new files every time or is it just repeating itself. it appears to be old mail and snort logs HELP!! pa can't receive mail to theis accounbt since box is dead-- Christopher Nye AIA Dir. of Information Services 630 495-1900 The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 16:06:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E614C16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:06:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5142343D5D for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:06:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1238111rng for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:06:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=c7qrKTR8b1BYF+OnWuNHnvypAH8ndYLTN5A/k4ISBSZy0bBTXc7X7ZgpLtzhMJLle5jeuVC+0YPJ5lmVrRqZ8zj6PIu2OpfVL1kNPATg+wW1dIAtwryf9ZhGpkqWOX2JCXsz7NTKipX3Y5NadiJM1mjVgKjWtp6/nehPQvWTP+Y= Received: by 10.38.160.52 with SMTP id i52mr5342162rne; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:06:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.98.28 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:06:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51d7a516050404090660bb68ed@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:06:41 -0700 From: perikillo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Securelevel dont let ipf read rules... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: perikillo List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:06:44 -0000 Hi all, i was testing my firewaill with Freebsd 4.11 Release and ipf on th= e=20 kernel. I have ppp setup to run on every time i turn on the system, i was= =20 using securelevel=3D2 on the /etc/sysctl.conf kern.securelevel=3D2 and /etc/rc.conf /etc/rc.conf: kernel_securelevel=3D2 After i see that my firewall was ready to start his job, i decide to change= =20 the secure level to paranoid level and change the secure level to 3: /etc/sysctl.conf: kern.securelevel=3D3 /etc/rc.conf: kernel_securelevel=3D3 Went i restart my computer, and try to access with my other computer wich= =20 use Windows 2k, i try to access the internet, and see that my browser dont= =20 find nothing, make some test on it, but no access to the outside world. I g= o=20 back to my firewall and test the conecction: test#ifconfig This show that i was conected, then test with ping, fastest_cvsup none of= =20 then reach the outside world. After this i test ipf : test#ipfstat -hio upsssssssssssssss, dont have any rules on my firewall, the i go to: test# ee /var/log/console I go to the end of the file and read my last boot up messages and see that= =20 went my system try read the /etc/ipf.rules and /etc/ipmon.rules the system= =20 secure level=3D3 on /etc/syctl.conf dont let ipf and ipnat to charge his ru= les=20 set.=20 "Operation Not Permite" (something like this mmmm dont remember the right= =20 messages :-\) /etc/sysctl.conf goes before /etc/rc.conf, i was thinking that if i setup= =20 securelevel=3D1 on sysctl.conf and then on rc.conf after ipf and ppp start,= =20 setup securelevel to 3, but my rc.conf dosent do nothing.=20 How can i reach securelevel=3D3 and run my firewall, i dont want to input= =20 nothing directly i want that baby(freebsd) do every thing automatically,=20 maybe i need to setup a script??? Or i am doing something wrong? I read man init but dont see nothing about this issue... Thanks all for your comments. NOTE: Freebsd 4.11 Release, ipfilter compile in the kernel. This machine ru= n=20 only my firewall no servers is an old pentium 100Mhz. I try to write my bes= t=20 english. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 16:10:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB6F16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:10:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from epz01.nefonline.de (epz01.nefonline.de [212.204.66.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696D943D3F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:10:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jochen.keil@gmail.com) Received: from sillium.dyndns.org (DSL01.212.114.230.13.NEFkom.net [212.114.230.13]) by epz01.nefonline.de (NEFkom Mailservice) with SMTP id j34GAJX00446 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:10:19 +0200 Received: (qmail 13489 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2005 16:10:19 -0000 Received: from semeon.lokal.lan (HELO ?192.168.1.7?) (192.168.1.7) by columbus.lokal.lan with SMTP; 4 Apr 2005 16:10:19 -0000 Message-ID: <425166EB.4090700@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 18:10:19 +0200 From: Jochen Keil User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kiffin Gish References: <000001c53763$b1a9ea80$9900000a@ZGISH> In-Reply-To: <000001c53763$b1a9ea80$9900000a@ZGISH> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which mail server is the best for me? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:10:22 -0000 Kiffin Gish wrote: > I would like to setup a mail server but am a little confused about whether > to use sendmail, qmail, postfix or whatever. Basically my web server is a > simple one to be used for personal use with maybe no more than a 10-20 mail > accounts. Those statements made by someone about qmail needing patches are not true. Qmail runs very good here with the same usage you described above. Someone else said that qmail breaks standards. This is true but DJB gives a good explanation for this on his homepage. Anyway i never experienced problems because of this (maybe because it just works?). Furthermore configuration isn't "a pain in the ass". It takes you some time to get the idea but then qmail will reveal you endless possibilitys to configure qmail in a very easy and effective way (one word: dotfiles). There are also a lot of examples and FAQs on http://cr.yp.to. Another point for qmail: it will run reliable with daemontools. Finally just have a look at this: $ du -sh qmail-1.03 1.4M qmail-1.03 $ du -sh /usr/src/gnu/dist/sendmail/ 12M /usr/src/gnu/dist/sendmail/ $ du -sh /usr/src/gnu/dist/postfix/ 14M /usr/src/gnu/dist/postfix/ (postfix and sendmail are from the netbsd source but i don't think this matters.) > What are the advantages and/or disadvantages of each choice, and where can I > find more information comparing them? Again i can only speak about my own experiences. I had bind running a long time until a friend convinced me to try djbdns. It was like: "What? It's that easy to run a dnscache/server?". After that i followed his recommendation straight to qmail and i don't want to miss it anymore or feel the urge to try something different also i haven't run a mail server before. So much for djb advocacy. Greetings, Jochen Keil From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 16:10:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0244516A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:10:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4C943D46 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:10:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:13:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4251670B.8080309@daleco.biz> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:10:51 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Danter References: <42515DCE.2010207@ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <42515DCE.2010207@ntlworld.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Apr 2005 16:13:25.0960 (UTC) FILETIME=[3B377C80:01C53931] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade failing on firefox and thunderbird X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:10:56 -0000 Richard Danter wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to update my installations of firefox and thunderbird. I have > done this several times in the past with no problems but lately I get the > following errors (see below). Anyone else seeing this? I can update > other ports just fine... > > Thanks > Rich Well, the output you sent tells us that you have a "checksum mismatch" for the firefox tarball. Basically, the firefox tarball is corrupt - the system can't verify that it's the right file. Most likely, a tarball was partially downloaded, and for some reason was truncated before fetch got finished with it (e.g. connection dropped, you control-C'ed out to do something else, whatever), or it's possible that the file was simply corrupted in transfer. This is a pretty easy fix --- all you should have to do is delete the bad tarball from /usr/ports/distfiles and start the process again. HTH, Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 16:13:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D8416A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:13:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4310343D2F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:13:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.44] (port=4587 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DIUCW-000ECU-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:13:20 +0400 Message-ID: <425167A6.1070700@mail.ru> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:13:26 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olaf van der Spek References: <48a5f32a05040405393061ec68@mail.gmail.com> <48a5f32a05040406045d5a3e15@mail.gmail.com> <42514210.2010509@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will Sempron 754 run with FreeBSD i386? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:13:22 -0000 Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On Apr 4, 2005 3:33 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > >>Gareth Bailey wrote: >> >>>Thanks. Can anyone else comment on the following points?: >>> >>>The 754 Sempron: >>> >>>- Will run in FreeBSD 4.11 i386? >>>- Will not be faster than Sempron socket A? >> >> >>Sempron cores are identical in Socket A and >>Socket 754 versions. Both support only 32-bit > > > Are you sure? > The s754 versions have an on die memory controller and a K8 core > (although with disabled 64-bit mode), which should make it > significantly faster then the K7 based Sempron on sA. Yeah, it appears I got a wrong idea from some poor article. As a matter of fact, Sempron/sA is based on Barton core, while Sempron/s754 is a K8 sister. The latter has an on-chip memory controller and SSE2 instruction set supported. They are pretty same in all other aspects though, and I still suppose the perfomance margin is negligible. http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_11599_11604,00.html >>Sempron/754 might be a little faster than >>it's Socket A version - but that's _only_ >>because of the chipsets for Socket 754 are >>more advanced than Socket A ones. I would >>generally recommend using Sempron/754, as >>you could upgrade to Athlon 64 later and >>FreeBSD/x64 then. On the other hand, s754 >>will be deprecated in a few years in favour >>of s939. > > > Even for Sempron? Yeah, it has been announced a few times, that Sempron/s939 will be available somewhen in 2005 "as market requires": http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_608,00.html Best wishes, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 16:15:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39D816A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:15:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EDE43D55 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:15:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pergesu@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1241459rng for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:15:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=PktDirZYS8bA+Ay9+hp7Nq/jlspnXmwFZeC8jysU8amlaz9Z2k/lO5Vd/vr/NDqjpKhJoFPLMIRu0xdq70+OOFTieLBaOex5iuZWAUVxBEMjxOihqYWOsZ19eN3cYoFZJ5LRQZGoLW4h9h9EVwGf6f2Knzj7yBndKZF58s7W7fM= Received: by 10.38.86.68 with SMTP id j68mr5453910rnb; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.42.28 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <810a540e050404091536f7fe1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:15:37 -0700 From: Pat Maddox To: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <425137AA.8090401@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <810a540e05040405173caeb280@mail.gmail.com> <425137AA.8090401@mail.ru> Subject: Re: arplookup failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pat Maddox List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:15:39 -0000 Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 69.61.54.161 UGS 0 838 rl0 69.61.54.160/29 link#1 UC 0 0 rl0 69.61.54.161 00:02:85:0d:7c:80 UHLW 1 0 rl0 156 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 ::1 UH lo0 fe80::%rl0/64 link#1 UC rl0 fe80::20c:6eff:fe44:4391%rl0 00:0c:6e:44:43:91 UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#2 UHL lo0 ff01::/32 ::1 U lo0 ff02::%rl0/32 link#1 UC rl0 ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 UC lo0 On Apr 4, 2005 5:48 AM, Andrew P. wrote: > Pat Maddox wrote: > > I've got a system running 5.3-p6, and am getting this error every 20 > > minutes or so: > > kernel: arplookup 69.61.54.33 failed: host is not on local network > > > > I get that the host isn't on the network, but I don't have any idea > > where the message is coming from. It's in /var/log/messages, shows up > > about every 20 minutes. Any ideas? > > Maybe a direct route to that host is specified > in your routing table. Provide the output of > `netstat -rn` please. > > Best wishes, > Andrew P. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 16:21:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C5F16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:21:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prosporo.hedron.org (hedron.org [66.11.182.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68AC543D5F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:21:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ean@hedron.org) Received: from www.hedron.org (localhost.hedron.org [127.0.0.1]) by prosporo.hedron.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCF9C104 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:21:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 216.220.59.169 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ean); by www.hedron.org with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:21:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3791.216.220.59.169.1112631715.squirrel@216.220.59.169> In-Reply-To: <20050402124754.GB6829@gothmog.gr> References: <20050402140601.D9329@kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl> <20050402124754.GB6829@gothmog.gr> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:21:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ean Kingston" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: *attaching* a file to /usr/bin/mail message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:21:07 -0000 > On 2005-04-02 14:08, "Colin J. Raven" wrote: >> Does anyone happen to know how you would *attach* *not readin the >> contents of, but actually *attach*) a file using /usr/bin/mail? > > Not very easily, is one answer. You can probably get away with uuencode > output filtered to the standard input of mail(1), but that's not really > a "MIME attachment". Okay, if you really want to use mail, here is what a mail message (suitable for sending through /usr/bin/mail looks like when it has a UUEncoded attachement. Technically you are supposed to MIME-Encode the attachment but pretty much every mail client that supports attachments will read a UUEncoded attachment. From: "System Administrator" To: "test user" Subject: Testing mail attachments. Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="This_can_not_match_any_other_line_in_the_message" MIME-Verion: 1.0 --This_can_not_match_any_other_line_in_the_message Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-type: text/plain Hi, Attached is a simple text file to test multi-part sending. The file was originally called sample.txt and was created on a SUN system. Notice the string specified in the boundary="..." bit in the headers. That string should not occur anywhere in the body except as part of the mime part delimitters. --This_can_not_match_any_other_line_in_the_message Content-Transfer-Encoding: x-uuencode Content-Type: text/plain; name="sample.txt" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="sample.txt" begin 644 sample.txt M5&AI with mail(1) only, you can always use mutt for this. > > mutt -a /path/to/file recipient.address@example.net > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Ean Kingston E-Mail: ean_AT_hedron_DOT_org PGP KeyID: 1024D/CBC5D6BB URL: http://www.hedron.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 16:35:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE0D16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:35:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4751343D58 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:35:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olafvdspek@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1477418wri for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:35:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=b8vy8PJrwpvp/MqZR9z7hAyPTTApuhJv3JN1SDDvITTq9GvE7EhlX8SkhkkBxieBEIQnj/nFugvf3oDAlGba6CULaPORQ/rJ/pSiy0WHLZmEaI8IG6AEXz+VR5atcpjvxWjwMTxQxRBMTSRariS/FnAhvruXjejHkR3u4CWw/j4= Received: by 10.54.42.72 with SMTP id p72mr420959wrp; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:35:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.49.66 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:35:02 +0200 From: Olaf van der Spek To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <425167A6.1070700@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <48a5f32a05040405393061ec68@mail.gmail.com> <42514210.2010509@mail.ru><425167A6.1070700@mail.ru> Subject: Re: Will Sempron 754 run with FreeBSD i386? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Olaf van der Spek List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:35:06 -0000 On Apr 4, 2005 6:13 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > > Are you sure? > > The s754 versions have an on die memory controller and a K8 core > > (although with disabled 64-bit mode), which should make it > > significantly faster then the K7 based Sempron on sA. > > Yeah, it appears I got a wrong idea from some poor > article. As a matter of fact, Sempron/sA is based > on Barton core, while Sempron/s754 is a K8 sister. > The latter has an on-chip memory controller and > SSE2 instruction set supported. They are pretty > same in all other aspects though, and I still > suppose the perfomance margin is negligible. Why do you expect so much performance to be lost compared to the Athlon 64 s754? The Athlon 64 s754 is significantly faster than the Athlon XP. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 16:35:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580C916A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:35:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.r.caley.org.uk (82-41-208-48.cable.ubr12.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.208.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438A643D48 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:35:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rjc@caley.org.uk) Received: from pele.r.caley.org.uk (pele.r.caley.org.uk [10.0.0.12]) by mail.r.caley.org.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j34GZR4L058486; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:35:27 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjc@caley.org.uk) Received: from pele.r.caley.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pele.r.caley.org.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j34GZRkY074424; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:35:27 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjc@bast.r.caley.org.uk) Received: (from rjc@localhost) by pele.r.caley.org.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j34GZRej074421; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:35:27 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjc@bast.r.caley.org.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: pele.r.caley.org.uk: rjc set sender to rjc@bast.r.caley.org.uk using -f Sender: rjc@caley.org.uk To: "Colin J. Raven" References: <20050402140601.D9329@kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl> From: Richard Caley In-Reply-To: <20050402140601.D9329@kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl> Date: 04 Apr 2005 17:35:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87sm2633g0.fsf@pele.r.caley.org.uk> Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: *attaching* a file to /usr/bin/mail message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:35:30 -0000 In article <20050402140601.D9329@kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl>, Colin J Raven (cjr) writes: cjr> Does anyone happen to know how you would *attach* *not readin the cjr> contents of, but actually *attach*) a file using /usr/bin/mail? The metamail package includes metasend, a script which will build a MIME message you can then send to bin/mail or sendmail or whatever. -- Mail me as MYFIRSTNAME@MYLASTNAME.org.uk _O_ |< From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 16:35:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70A516A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:35:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (ns1.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5180543D31 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:35:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.tsgincorporated.com [127.0.0.1]) by smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82DD3CD70E; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:35:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 89752-03; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:35:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.tsgincorporated.com (ns2.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.6]) by smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789803CD70A; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:35:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from micheal (micheal.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.77]) by mail.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5964262896; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:35:49 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <0ba801c53934$a4964000$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: "Anton Zavrin" , References: <20050404142701.C134343D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:37:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tsgincorporated.com Subject: Re: mpd VPN Server / W2K Clients X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:35:54 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anton Zavrin" To: Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 9:27 AM Subject: mpd VPN Server / W2K Clients > Hello Jonathan, > > I found this thread from a long time ago at FreeBSD addicts: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2003-December/027869.ht > ml > > I'm having absolutely identical problem with my MPD (it used to work and > then it just stopped, who knows why). I tried to follow up on that solution > you posted, but that page no longer opens up. Any help is greatly > appreciated. > > Thank you much! > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 4/1/2005 > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Anton, some things too look for here. Are the remote systems using Win XP? If so, are their firewalls configured to allow traffic from your network on TCP ports 1723? Also, is GRE being blocked at any point between your mpd system and their end? If it just stopped working, has anyone placed a firmware firewall device in recently? Many of them that I've run across recently don't even know what GRE is so a specific entry has to be made to allow protocol 47 to pass freely in order to get pptp to function properly. Hope it helps. -- Micheal Patterson Senior Communications Systems Engineer 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 16:37:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA93D16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:37:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vms048pub.verizon.net (vms048pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EFD43D5C for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:37:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ([4.27.46.32])0.04 <0IEF001DHKU80YZ1@vms048.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:37:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: by ringworm.mechee.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7C9B52CE776; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:36:44 -0700 From: "Michael C. Shultz" In-reply-to: <1523.209.87.176.4.1112625637.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200504040936.44736.ringworm01@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <1523.209.87.176.4.1112625637.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:37:24 -0000 On Monday 04 April 2005 07:40 am, Brian John wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2005 9:12 PM, Anthony Atkielski > > > > wrote: > > > One you've changed resolv.conf, it should stay that way > > > permanently across boots, unless you change it again. > > > > dhclient will overwrite /etc/resolv.conf on boot > > How can I keep dhclient from doing this? > > /Brian Running chflags schg /etc/resolv.conf as root would keep it from being changed. You still should figure out why dhclient is putting the wrong info in resolv.conf though. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 16:52:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9E516A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:52:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fuse1.fusemail.net (smtp.fusemail.net [69.31.1.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2655F43D46 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:52:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brianjohn@fusemail.com) Received: from fusemail.com by fuse1.fusemail.net with asmtp (FuseMail extSMTP) id 1DIUo7-0000id-O3; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:52:11 -0500 Received: from 209.87.176.4 (FuseMail web AccountID 19592) by webmail.fusemail.com with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:52:17 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <2735.209.87.176.4.1112633537.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:52:17 -0500 (CDT) From: "Brian John" To: "Michael C. Shultz" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: FuseMail W MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: brianjohn@fusemail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:52:18 -0000 > On Monday 04 April 2005 07:40 am, Brian John wrote: > > > On Apr 3, 2005 9:12 PM, Anthony Atkielski > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > One you've changed resolv.conf, it should stay that way > > > > permanently across boots, unless you change it again. > > > > > > dhclient will overwrite /etc/resolv.conf on boot > > > > How can I keep dhclient from doing this? > > > > /Brian > > Running chflags schg /etc/resolv.conf as root would keep > it from being changed. You still should figure out why > dhclient is putting the wrong info in resolv.conf though. How can I find that out? Sorry, but I'm pretty new to networking in FreeBSD (not networking in general) so I need a little bit of direction. Thanks for the help /Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 17:00:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460A816A4CF for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:00:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net (vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD0B43D46 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:00:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ([4.27.46.32])0.04 <0IEF00FSELW99JL2@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:00:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: by ringworm.mechee.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 453F72CE776; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:59:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:59:23 -0700 From: "Michael C. Shultz" In-reply-to: <2735.209.87.176.4.1112633537.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200504040959.27017.ringworm01@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <2735.209.87.176.4.1112633537.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:00:11 -0000 On Monday 04 April 2005 09:52 am, Brian John wrote: > > On Monday 04 April 2005 07:40 am, Brian John wrote: > > > > On Apr 3, 2005 9:12 PM, Anthony Atkielski > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > One you've changed resolv.conf, it should stay that way > > > > > permanently across boots, unless you change it again. > > > > > > > > dhclient will overwrite /etc/resolv.conf on boot > > > > > > How can I keep dhclient from doing this? > > > > > > /Brian > > > > Running chflags schg /etc/resolv.conf as root would keep > > it from being changed. You still should figure out why > > dhclient is putting the wrong info in resolv.conf though. > > How can I find that out? Sorry, but I'm pretty new to networking in > FreeBSD (not networking in general) so I need a little bit of > direction. > > Thanks for the help > > /Brian I'm not an expert on dhclient sorry, I just know that setting the immutable flag will keep things from changing your resolv.conf file. Hopefully someone else will give you useful information about dhclient. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 17:00:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE7D16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:00:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6387E43D46 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:00:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.44] (port=4804 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DIUwN-0009Ld-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:00:43 +0400 Message-ID: <425172C1.7000009@mail.ru> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:00:49 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olaf van der Spek References: <48a5f32a05040405393061ec68@mail.gmail.com> <42514210.2010509@mail.ru><425167A6.1070700@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will Sempron 754 run with FreeBSD i386? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:00:45 -0000 Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On Apr 4, 2005 6:13 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > >>>Are you sure? >>>The s754 versions have an on die memory controller and a K8 core >>>(although with disabled 64-bit mode), which should make it >>>significantly faster then the K7 based Sempron on sA. >> >>Yeah, it appears I got a wrong idea from some poor >>article. As a matter of fact, Sempron/sA is based >>on Barton core, while Sempron/s754 is a K8 sister. >>The latter has an on-chip memory controller and >>SSE2 instruction set supported. They are pretty >>same in all other aspects though, and I still >>suppose the perfomance margin is negligible. > > > Why do you expect so much performance to be lost compared to the Athlon 64 s754? > The Athlon 64 s754 is significantly faster than the Athlon XP. I haven't seen any tests, yet I've seen Sempron/Socket-A in action and it was impressive. I also have Athlon 64 and Athlon XP pc's at home and I don't think K8 is so superior. In non-sse2 non-very-memory-intensive applications it performs better, but not "turbo-charged". Besides, AMD is pricing Socket-A Semprons even higher than s754 versions. Considering the fact that s754 is clocked lower than sA of the same PR, it can be hard to determine the speed difference. Anyway, I really think there's nothing for us to argue about :) Gareth is staying with s754 and we should be glad for him :) Very best wishes, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 17:07:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE85516A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:07:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hqfirepu2-ext.agedwards.com (hqfirepu2-ext.agedwards.com [63.93.197.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2250343D1F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:07:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tom.Harrison@agedwards.com) Received: from hqmswpn2.agedwards.com by hqfirepu2-ext.agedwards.com via smtpd (for mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) with SMTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:10:03 -0400 Received: from HQHAMPN3 (hqhampn3.agedwards.com) by HQMSWPN2.agedwards.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.14) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:06:43 -0500 Received: from CCEBHOPN1.home.corp.agedwards.com (unverified) by HQHAMPN3 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with ESMTP id ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:04:51 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:04:50 -0500 Message-Id: <831B2B0ACB9BD51180630002A56BD0F00DECDFFD@hqempn09.agedwards.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Free NCD Explora 451's to a good home Thread-Index: AcU5OGmupbDhZNJASWub1EtbohP7fQ== From: "Harrison, Tom" To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: JSHAMLET@COMCAST.NET Subject: Free NCD Explora 451's to a good home X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:07:00 -0000 Seth, Do you still have the Explora 451's? Tom Harrison Distributed Computing Engineering 955-8344 4E-32K ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------- A.G. Edwards & Sons' outgoing and incoming e-mails are electronically archived and subject to review and/or disclosure to someone other=20 than the recipient. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 17:11:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F20816A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:11:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BEAC43D5D for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:11:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.44] (port=4815 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DIV6i-000DzX-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:11:24 +0400 Message-ID: <42517542.70407@mail.ru> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:11:30 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pat Maddox References: <810a540e05040405173caeb280@mail.gmail.com> <425137AA.8090401@mail.ru> <810a540e050404091536f7fe1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <810a540e050404091536f7fe1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: arplookup failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:11:25 -0000 Pat Maddox wrote: > On Apr 4, 2005 5:48 AM, Andrew P. wrote: >>Pat Maddox wrote: >> >>>I've got a system running 5.3-p6, and am getting this error every 20 >>>minutes or so: >>>kernel: arplookup 69.61.54.33 failed: host is not on local network >>> >>>I get that the host isn't on the network, but I don't have any idea >>>where the message is coming from. It's in /var/log/messages, shows up >>>about every 20 minutes. Any ideas? >> >>Maybe a direct route to that host is specified >>in your routing table. Provide the output of >>`netstat -rn` please. > > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif > default 69.61.54.161 UGS 0 838 rl0 > 69.61.54.160/29 link#1 UC 0 0 rl0 > 69.61.54.161 00:02:85:0d:7c:80 UHLW 1 0 rl0 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 Hmm, according to this table every packet with 69.61.54.33 destination would be sent to 69.61.54.161 gateway, arplookup would not be performed for the 33 address. What comes to my mind is that some broken router might be messing your routing table via ICMP (or do you use a routing protocol like RIP or OSPF?) You might need to run 'route monitor > route_changes.log &' for a few hours and post the log, for us to see what's happening. Best wishes, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 17:50:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7D616A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:50:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CE343D46 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:50:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 8327 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2005 17:50:57 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Apr 2005 17:50:56 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id EA6392E; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:50:55 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: brianjohn@fusemail.com References: <1523.209.87.176.4.1112625637.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 04 Apr 2005 13:50:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1523.209.87.176.4.1112625637.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> Message-ID: <441x9qwhvk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:50:57 -0000 "Brian John" writes: > > On Apr 3, 2005 9:12 PM, Anthony Atkielski > wrote: > > > > > > One you've changed resolv.conf, it should stay that way permanently > > > across boots, unless you change it again. > > > > > > > > > dhclient will overwrite /etc/resolv.conf on boot > > How can I keep dhclient from doing this? Configure it not to: according to "man dhclient.conf", a "prepend domain-name-servers " should do it. Or better yet, fix your router so that it either provides DNS services or stops telling your FreeBSD machine that it does. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 17:54:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590F916A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:54:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF88643D66 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:54:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1270978rng for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:54:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=hqKD3Z/5IOea9HA+Jc6fbGifCNevzpLi1Rjt4pLB/zW3L0COO3uxwR/w5KpuwtAL6xFGujaZpSXPscLZ+6UT0/yQV//DCAfwq+fqrAYwGm4prtQkUvrP6oC0697LwuA+Sypqp11uLwOW+X1QIDq1IB5PLZ5JouOi8Bet02YDgKU= Received: by 10.38.13.39 with SMTP id 39mr5482874rnm; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:54:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:54:17 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: infofarmer@mail.ru In-Reply-To: <425110D4.2020106@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <425110D4.2020106@mail.ru> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: exec make buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:54:19 -0000 On Apr 4, 2005 12:03 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > Jonathan Chen wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 06:16:14AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > >>On Apr 4, 2005 6:07 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > >> > >>>Is it possible to do a ssh conection then do exec make buildworld on > >>>the remote system close the conection and do a conection again later > >>>and get the output from make buildworld again ? > >>> > >> > >>Doh i forgot the important part again, without using screen :) > > > > > > # make buildworld >& log.file & > > # logout > > It's kinda strange, but it didn't work for me yesterday. > The build stopped as soon as I logged out, I used > Ctrl-D instead of logout though. > > What I find more comfortable is > # at + 1 minute > make buildworld > Ctrl-D > > Some time after I have new mail, containing all the > output (stdout and stderr) from the task. That's cute. > i think it did not work because you have to do "exec make buildworld > log.file & logout" dont know did not try it yet :) Is ctrl+D the same as close exit or logout or does it stand for detach and run in the background ? If i do ctrl +D in a terminal doing nothing ? Will the terminal be runing forever in the background doing nothing untill i kill it ? Where can you find a list of csh ctrl commands ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 17:56:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB2116A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:56:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from elephant.cnchost.com (elephant.cnchost.com [207.155.252.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F8443D53 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:56:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@arconassoc.com) Received: from system13 (ip67-153-59-26.z59-153-67.customer.algx.net [67.153.59.26]) by elephant.cnchost.com id NAA02325; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:56:47 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: From: "Chris Nye" Organization: ARCON Associatiates To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:55:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <42513958.9536.1B75F9D@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Subject: xoasis hell over for now X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:56:48 -0000 got her back up and running on my own. (it only took 8 hrs and got knows how many reboots). Don't know why she crashed & burned yet Thanks anyway. ******************************************* my xoasis box rolled over & died sat mail & web server down so have been trying to get it online for last 6 hrs. system rebooted itself and I came in to screen to run fsck manually. I did and it ran till lost+found fills up. I manually mount with -fw and delete folder with rm-r restart fsck and it finishs but autoanswers No so I rebott the bos and it runs again till the folders fills up. Am I del new files every time or is it just repeating itself. it appears to be old mail and snort logs HELP!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 18:00:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E170316A4CF for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:00:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mattvirushome.dynu.com (h139-055-210-165.adsl.navix.net [139.55.210.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FD043D45 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:00:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mattvirus@navix.net) Received: from [192.168.0.95] (mattvirushome.dynu.com [10.0.0.20]) j34I02s7035866 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:00:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mattvirus@navix.net) Message-ID: <42518093.9070208@navix.net> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:59:47 -0500 From: matt virus User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd References: <000001c53763$b1a9ea80$9900000a@ZGISH> <200504021407.38266.bob89@bobj.org> In-Reply-To: <200504021407.38266.bob89@bobj.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Which mail server is the best for me? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 18:00:08 -0000 Bob Johnson wrote: > > I prefer Courier. It is similar to qmail, but it doesn't require all > the patching that it takes to make qmail usable. And unlike qmail, it > attempts to comply with email standards. > http://www.courier-mta.org > > /usr/ports/mail/courier > > - Bob It seems this port is broken...anyone have an idea what needs to be fixed to get it to run? -- Matt Virus ("veer-iss") http://www.mattvirus.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 18:03:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01CE16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:03:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E0243D54 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:03:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) id j34I3luL007140; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:03:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (pool-68-161-53-96.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.53.96]) (authenticated bits=0)j34I3jut010665; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:03:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <425110D4.2020106@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <999bb533b06ea72632e11ad5c80309e9@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:03:44 -0400 To: Gert Cuykens X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) cc: freebsd list Subject: Re: exec make buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 18:03:48 -0000 On Apr 4, 2005, at 1:54 PM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > think it did not work because you have to do "exec make buildworld > > log.file & logout" dont know did not try it yet :) > > Is ctrl+D the same as close exit or logout or does it stand for detach > and run in the background ? Cntl-D when read as input means EOF. The shell reads commands until it reaches the end of the shell script, or the end of user input, and then exits. Cntl-D thus behaves similar to exit or logout. [ EOF really is a state of mind, not a character. ] > If i do ctrl +D in a terminal doing nothing ? Your shell will exit. > Will the terminal be runing forever in the background doing > nothing untill i kill it ? Nope. Your terminal window will notice the child shell process go away, and will do the same thing. > Where can you find a list of csh ctrl commands ? These aren't specific to csh, but see "stty -a". -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 18:05:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C42B16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:05:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B5443D2F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:05:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1273747rng for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:05:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=C9cuuR06ELiauz2Ku7Cdxb8AOdabHrbMULca/edN9PhLpWTVxUrW8cIRxuxhigNHXWqPlJD9q4o6VOO8Ul7xUSm2VF+LaoV4qqTYAfvzentNxxoXERo/53ajAytpMbC/f9yPqwBYtk8VP2cChcK1R/aUejww0stP68lCq/B7Q3c= Received: by 10.38.160.52 with SMTP id i52mr5458800rne; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:05:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:05:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:05:14 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: infofarmer@mail.ru In-Reply-To: <4251112E.9040408@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4251112E.9040408@mail.ru> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 18:05:16 -0000 On Apr 4, 2005 12:04 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > Gert Cuykens wrote: > > Who do i ask if he / she would like to put this to the distribution list > > > > [ ] cvsupdate-nogui > > > > Cant we make some user freebsd-voting list were we can vote for changes :) > > Come to think about it, I kinda miss this option, too. > > Best wishes, > Andrew P. > Alrighdy thats 2 votes already :) I say we go to the california and go run in circles holding a cvsup pannel :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 18:14:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4743616A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:14:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBD743D5D for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:14:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1275856rng for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:14:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=JUyGNupP/WVg+qS3wtVcnTdoXGOMt9Exf8XMBZJNug0vVmhHxIhHzsVri3x6awLLzvXux6MveWd52nSpF6+vR3IHxr4ytRQKVce16mthUdEvvCwxnaAe4VxIjJlL0G9fJ2LtICCDjde/lh70lPiQz+2LF2MRTZuP6HnVHVKtBjo= Received: by 10.38.67.50 with SMTP id p50mr5561743rna; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:14:02 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: Charles Swiger In-Reply-To: <999bb533b06ea72632e11ad5c80309e9@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <425110D4.2020106@mail.ru> <999bb533b06ea72632e11ad5c80309e9@mac.com> cc: freebsd list Subject: Re: exec make buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 18:14:04 -0000 On Apr 4, 2005 8:03 PM, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Apr 4, 2005, at 1:54 PM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > think it did not work because you have to do "exec make buildworld > > > log.file & logout" dont know did not try it yet :) > > > > Is ctrl+D the same as close exit or logout or does it stand for detach > > and run in the background ? > > Cntl-D when read as input means EOF. The shell reads commands until it > reaches the end of the shell script, or the end of user input, and then > exits. Cntl-D thus behaves similar to exit or logout. > > [ EOF really is a state of mind, not a character. ] > > > If i do ctrl +D in a terminal doing nothing ? > > Your shell will exit. > > > Will the terminal be runing forever in the background doing > > nothing untill i kill it ? > > Nope. Your terminal window will notice the child shell process go > away, and will do the same thing. > > > Where can you find a list of csh ctrl commands ? > > These aren't specific to csh, but see "stty -a". > what does stty stand for ? signal text terminal y... ? FX-53U stty -a speed 38400 baud; 24 rows; 80 columns; lflags: icanon isig iexten echo echoe echok echoke -echonl echoctl -echoprt -altwerase -noflsh -tostop -flusho pendin -nokerninfo -extproc iflags: -istrip icrnl -inlcr -igncr ixon -ixoff -ixany imaxbel -ignbrk brkint -inpck ignpar -parmrk oflags: opost onlcr -ocrnl -oxtabs -onocr -onlret cflags: cread cs8 -parenb -parodd -hupcl -clocal -cstopb -crtscts -dsrflow -dtrflow -mdmbuf cchars: discard = ^O; dsusp = ^Y; eof = ^D; eol = ; eol2 = ; erase = ^H; erase2 = ^H; intr = ^C; kill = ^U; lnext = ^V; min = 1; quit = ^\; reprint = ^R; start = ^Q; status = ^T; stop = ^S; susp = ^Z; time = 0; werase = ^W; FX-53U So ^D stand for end of file, what does this mean time = 0; ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 18:42:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0668E16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:42:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from orb.pobox.com (orb.pobox.com [207.8.226.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC09F43D55 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:42:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from LukeD@pobox.com) Received: from orb (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orb.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC212BD; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:42:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from evrtwa1-ar19-4-41-048-029.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net (evrtwa1-ar19-4-41-048-029.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net [4.41.48.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by orb.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1748B; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:42:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:41:56 -0700 (PDT) From: LukeD@pobox.com X-X-Sender: lukas@border.crystalsphere.multiverse To: Brian John In-Reply-To: <42509456.1060304@fusemail.com> Message-ID: <20050404103139.V5130@border.crystalsphere.multiverse> References: <42509456.1060304@fusemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help with pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: LukeD@pobox.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 18:42:10 -0000 On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Brian John wrote: > altq on $ext_if priq > queue mail priority 13 > queue ssh priority 12 > queue web priority 14 I see one syntactical thing you missed. You have to define your child queues in your altq declaration. Something like: altq on $ext_if priq queue {mail, ssh, web} Also, after you get the syntax right, unless the maximum bandwidth of your outside line is the same as the maximum bandwidth of your network card (does this ever happen?) you're going to want to use the "bandwidth" keyword in that declaration also, and pick a proper value for it. Picking the right bandwidth value seems to be an art form that requires a lot of trial and error and liberal use of "pfctl -vvs queue" If traffic shaping isn't working and your queues are always empty, then the number is too high. If the queues are filling up and dropping too many packets, then either the number is too low or you're just generating more traffic than you can handle well. Luke Dean From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 18:42:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDD816A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:42:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B82143D5F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:42:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin01-en2 [10.13.10.146]) id j34Igj7V029567; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (pool-68-161-53-96.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.53.96]) (authenticated bits=0)j34IghTX017636; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:42:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <425110D4.2020106@mail.ru> <999bb533b06ea72632e11ad5c80309e9@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:42:42 -0400 To: Gert Cuykens X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) cc: freebsd list Subject: Re: exec make buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 18:42:45 -0000 On Apr 4, 2005, at 2:14 PM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > what does stty stand for ? If you want a complete description, read the manpage. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 18:45:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C943516A4D4 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:45:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gnezdov.net (63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net [63.224.222.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2CC43D49 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:45:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sergei@gnezdov.net) Received: from gnezdov.net (localhost.birds [127.0.0.1]) by gnezdov.net (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j34IkQo3089283 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:46:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sergei@gnezdov.net) Received: (from sergei@localhost) by gnezdov.net (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id j34IkQgh089282 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:46:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sergei) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:46:26 -0700 From: use-reply-to@gnezdov.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050404184626.GI89002@gnezdov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Outgoing port 113 connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: sergei@gnezdov.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 18:45:21 -0000 My firewall keeps reporting that it denies outgoing 113 port connections. Why would I allow port 113 outgoing connections? I don't seem to have any problems at the moment. Also, how would I identify which program is trying to connect to 113 port? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 19:33:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D0916A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:33:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao08.cox.net (lakermmtao08.cox.net [68.230.240.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740F943D1D for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:33:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rjhjr@cox.net) Received: from localhost ([68.230.186.138]) by lakermmtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050404193333.UJDW18351.lakermmtao08.cox.net@localhost> for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:33:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:33:33 -0400 From: Bob Hall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050404193332.GA9648@kongemord.krig.net> Mail-Followup-To: Bob Hall , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050404184626.GI89002@gnezdov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050404184626.GI89002@gnezdov.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Outgoing port 113 connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 19:33:35 -0000 On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:46:26AM -0700, use-reply-to@gnezdov.net wrote: > My firewall keeps reporting that it denies outgoing 113 port > connections. > > Why would I allow port 113 outgoing connections? I don't seem to have > any problems at the moment. > > Also, how would I identify which program is trying to connect to 113 > port? I think the first step is grep 113 /etc/services From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 19:34:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305B316A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:34:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (r2g224.chello.upc.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D7C43D5C for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:34:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9ED8B1F87BED; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:34:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:34:05 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Sadashiv Kulthe Message-ID: <20050404193405.GB2013@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Sadashiv Kulthe , Shane Ambler , FreeBSD Mailing Lists References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Shane Ambler cc: FreeBSD Mailing Lists Subject: Re: webalizer package installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 19:34:09 -0000 # sadashiv.linux@gmail.com / 2005-04-04 20:24:00 +0530: > Hello, Hello, please keep this on questions@ > thanks a lot for info .. > Previously there was no ports directory under /usr > So I downloded all 12,### ports from net and extract them under /usr > now when I > cd /usr/ports/graphics/gd > or > cd /usr/ports/graphics/png > > and give command make it gives following error > > -bash-2.05b# pwd > /usr/ports/graphics/png > -bash-2.05b# make > /usr/sbin/sysctl: not found > "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1030: warning: "/usr/sbin/sysctl -n > kern.osreldate" returned non-zero status umm, how did you install the system? why does bsd.port.mk think that sysctl is in /usr/sbin? -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 19:39:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443A516A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:39:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2ED343D55 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:39:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.44] (port=1738 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx1.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DIXQT-000N7D-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 23:39:57 +0400 Message-ID: <42519813.8000808@mail.ru> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 23:40:03 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sergei@gnezdov.net References: <20050404184626.GI89002@gnezdov.net> In-Reply-To: <20050404184626.GI89002@gnezdov.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Outgoing port 113 connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 19:39:59 -0000 use-reply-to@gnezdov.net wrote: > My firewall keeps reporting that it denies outgoing 113 port > connections. > > Why would I allow port 113 outgoing connections? I don't seem to have > any problems at the moment. > > Also, how would I identify which program is trying to connect to 113 > port? 113 - порт netbios session, по которому Винда залезает на раÑшаренные реÑурÑÑ‹ другой Винды. У Ñ‚ÐµÐ±Ñ Ñ„Ð°Ð¹Ñ€Ð²Ð¾Ð» защищает комп, на котором уÑтановлен, или Ñетку? ЕÑли комп Ñ FreeBSD, то Ñто Ñтранно, а еÑли виндовую Ñетку, то ничего Ñтранного нет. Под Фрей Ñтот порт задейÑтвуетÑÑ Ð¿Ñ€Ð¸ попытке Ð¼Ð¾Ð½Ñ‚Ð¸Ñ€Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ smbfs и при иÑпользовании smbclient (чаÑÑ‚ÑŒ пакета samba). Best wishes, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 19:42:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3710C16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:42:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prosporo.hedron.org (hedron.org [66.11.182.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20AC43D45 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:42:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ean@hedron.org) Received: from www.hedron.org (localhost.hedron.org [127.0.0.1]) by prosporo.hedron.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93209C104; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:42:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 216.220.59.169 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ean); by www.hedron.org with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:42:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1065.216.220.59.169.1112643774.squirrel@216.220.59.169> In-Reply-To: <20050404184626.GI89002@gnezdov.net> References: <20050404184626.GI89002@gnezdov.net> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:42:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ean Kingston" To: sergei@gnezdov.net User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Outgoing port 113 connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 19:42:05 -0000 > My firewall keeps reporting that it denies outgoing 113 port > connections. > > Why would I allow port 113 outgoing connections? I don't seem to have > any problems at the moment. So that applications on your system can perform a remote ident request. I don't know of any program that requires ident to work. Some (like ssh in some configurations) will try it to get more information about the remote user by trying an ident call over the network. > Also, how would I identify which program is trying to connect to 113 > port? $ grep 113 /etc/services auth 113/tcp ident tap #Authentication Service auth 113/udp ident tap #Authentication Service You may also try sockstat, netstat, and tcpdump. -- Ean Kingston E-Mail: ean_AT_hedron_DOT_org PGP KeyID: 1024D/CBC5D6BB URL: http://www.hedron.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 19:53:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE2B16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:53:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from foo-bar.inter-sonic.com (foo-bar.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998CC43D31 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:53:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from barlow.h.inter-sonic.com (ua-83-227-186-34.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [83.227.186.34]) by foo-bar.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F336A6C48 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:53:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.h.inter-sonic.com [127.0.0.1]) by barlow.h.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A021141B for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:53:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.16.2.17] (kreutzman.h.inter-sonic.com [172.16.2.17]) by barlow.h.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0B71141A for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:53:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42519B1C.4090401@intersonic.se> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:53:00 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041226) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com Subject: Need help to debug freeze on IBM T41 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 19:53:09 -0000 Hi all, A 5.4-STABLE system that freezes to death at the "login:" prompt. I can boot single user ok, run sshd, inetd, ntpd, postfix etc. No signs in logs at all Did cvsup and rebuilt/mergemaster in single user today but did not change behaviour HDD 2 with XP is fine What is the best method to find out what the problem might be, like running rc with very verbose logging or somesuch? Thanks, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 19:53:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54B916A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:53:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F46943D39 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:53:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.44] (port=1790 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DIXe0-0001lB-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 23:53:56 +0400 Message-ID: <42519B5A.2040209@mail.ru> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 23:54:02 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gert Cuykens References: <4251112E.9040408@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 19:53:57 -0000 Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Apr 4, 2005 12:04 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > >>Gert Cuykens wrote: >> >>>Who do i ask if he / she would like to put this to the distribution list >>> >>>[ ] cvsupdate-nogui >>> >>>Cant we make some user freebsd-voting list were we can vote for changes :) >> >>Come to think about it, I kinda miss this option, too. > > Alrighdy thats 2 votes already :) > I say we go to the california and go run in circles holding a cvsup pannel :) BTW, I'd also vote for /etc/rc.d/ftpd script Wishes, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 20:34:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CE616A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:34:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from turing.cs.hmc.edu (turing.cs.hmc.edu [134.173.42.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B5043D54 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:34:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mac@cs.hmc.edu) Received: by turing.cs.hmc.edu (Postfix, from userid 34126) id C6A3953247; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:34:34 -0700 From: Mac Mason To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050404203434.GA10084@turing.cs.hmc.edu> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Determining what port owns a file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:34:36 -0000 --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline I want to put kghostview on a machine, but I don't want to install too much of KDE in the progress. Given that I have another machine with it already installed, how might I go about figuring out which port owns, say, /usr/local/bin/kghostview? (If anybody happens to know offhand, that would work too) Thanks! --Mac --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (SunOS) iD8DBQFCUaTZ1AphoTGXiN0RAuKYAJ9O9mtCNU4TLV5iaba8M6q9pvDyVQCgiO8q OdWDK6bLWt62Imo8mQLhv1E= =GIWG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 20:40:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F100616A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:40:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CFF43D1D for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:40:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 14517 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2005 20:40:24 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Apr 2005 20:40:24 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 91C552E; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:40:23 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Mac Mason References: <20050404203434.GA10084@turing.cs.hmc.edu> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 04 Apr 2005 16:40:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050404203434.GA10084@turing.cs.hmc.edu> Message-ID: <44acoenumg.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Determining what port owns a file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:40:25 -0000 Mac Mason writes: > I want to put kghostview on a machine, but I don't want to install too > much of KDE in the progress. > > Given that I have another machine with it already installed, how might I > go about figuring out which port owns, say, /usr/local/bin/kghostview? If you have portupgrade installed, then pkg_which(1) will tell you. Otherwise, "pkg_info -La" and a bit of searching will do the job. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 20:50:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A2E16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:50:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB96F43D2D for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:50:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j34KokIV019055; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:50:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:50:46 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050404205045.GC42193@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20050404203434.GA10084@turing.cs.hmc.edu> <44acoenumg.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44acoenumg.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: Mac Mason Subject: Re: Determining what port owns a file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:50:48 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 04), Lowell Gilbert said: > Mac Mason writes: > > > I want to put kghostview on a machine, but I don't want to install too > > much of KDE in the progress. > > > > Given that I have another machine with it already installed, how might I > > go about figuring out which port owns, say, /usr/local/bin/kghostview? > > If you have portupgrade installed, then pkg_which(1) will tell you. > Otherwise, "pkg_info -La" and a bit of searching will do the job. "pkg_info -W filename" does what "pkg_which filename" does, just a bit slower (and for only one file at a time) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 20:53:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD03E16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:53:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shiva.nextrials.com (shiva.nextrials.com [64.81.74.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59FC043D45 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:53:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dannyman@toldme.com) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (mito.sr.nextrials.com [192.168.1.102]) by shiva.nextrials.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9513C2826; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4251A92A.7020202@toldme.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:52:58 -0700 From: Danny Howard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050328) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freeebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FAQ: How to Measure Swap in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:53:06 -0000 Hello, I tried to get an answer to this question last year but failed. Today, I think I have it. Q: How do you measure swap utilization in FreeBSD? (Assuming you are writing a script to gather performance metrics.) A: If you are writing a C program, check kvm_getswapinfo(3) and maybe take a gander at the bottom of /usr/src/usr.bin/top/machine.c. A: If you are writing a Perl script: Measure swap activity: sysctl vm.stats.vm.v_swapin vm.stats.vm.v_swapout vm.stats.vm.v_swappgsin vm.stats.vm.v_swappgsout (I believe these results are COUNTER type values, like you get from netstat -inb. You could establish "swap activity" by plotting changes in this value.) Measure swap size: 0-13:38 djh@mito ~> swapinfo Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity /dev/ad0s1b 1022224 0 1022224 0% 0-13:38 djh@mito ~> swapctl -l Device: 1024-blocks Used: /dev/ad0s1b 1022224 0 If you are trying to accomodate n+1 swap devices, try this: 0-13:44 djh@mito ~> swapctl -lsk Device: 1024-blocks Used: /dev/ad0s1b 1022224 0 Total: 1022224 0 Now, perhaps the next poor soul to Google this topic may get a slightly better answer. :) Thanks, -danny -- http://dannyman.toldme.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 21:14:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBE216A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:14:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.km.kongsberg.com (mail.kmss.no [193.69.71.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F169D43D1F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:14:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chip.wiegand@simrad.com) To: "FreeBSD List" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Build V70_M4_01112005 Beta 3NP January 11, 2005 Message-ID: From: Chip Wiegand Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:14:20 -0700 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on SMTP02/DMZ(Release 6.5.3FP1|December 15, 2004) at 04.04.2005 23:10:53, Serialize complete at 04.04.2005 23:10:53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Subject: screwy network/dmz problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:14:28 -0000 here in our office we have a firewall running Firewall-1 (it is administered remotely from another office in another country). It is set up with a dmz so I can host a web server (which is running IIS), but it works. I am now adding another web server, running Apache/FreeBSD. Problem is the FBSD box does not ping anything. The IIS box can ping the FBSD box and get a response from it. I have used the same network settings on the FBSD box that are on the IIS box, changing only the ipaddress. I don't understand why the FBSD box only responds with network not found when trying to ping anything. Now the IIS box is not a member of any network, it is it's own workgroup called DMZ. Is the problem that the FBSD box needs to be a member of the workgroup DMZ? And if so, how do I get it there? Regards, Chip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 21:26:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A0016A510 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:26:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from foo-bar.inter-sonic.com (foo-bar.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5CB43D58 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:26:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from barlow.h.inter-sonic.com (ua-83-227-186-34.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [83.227.186.34]) by foo-bar.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2E6A6C39; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:26:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.h.inter-sonic.com [127.0.0.1]) by barlow.h.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE7F11420; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:26:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.16.2.17] (kreutzman.h.inter-sonic.com [172.16.2.17]) by barlow.h.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAEA1141A; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:26:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4251B0F7.70205@intersonic.se> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 23:26:15 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041226) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bob@a1poweruser.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com cc: Questions Subject: Re: Need help to debug freeze on IBM T41 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:26:29 -0000 bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > 5.4 is not an stable release yet. Its still under development. > People who try to use this bleeding edge version are suppose to know > how to debug kernel code. You will be much better off using 4.11 > release which is very stable and rock hard. All the 5.x version > still have major bugs it them. Use at your own risk. I AM using it at my own risk. I KNOW 4.11 is stable. I was asking for a hint on how I could LEARN MORE instead of JUST COMPLAINING. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 21:28:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDFC16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:28:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tmgcon.com (tmgcon.com [204.202.11.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F9743D2D for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:28:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gentoo@tmgcon.com) Received: from gentoo.lan.tmgcon.com (222-152-249-94.jetstream.xtra.co.nz [222.152.249.94]) (authenticated bits=0) by tmgcon.com (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j34LS9Mi053049 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:28:10 GMT From: Tom Munro Glass To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:24:37 +1200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504050924.37286.gentoo@tmgcon.com> Subject: Build options for ghostscript-gnu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:28:11 -0000 Whenever portmanager decides to rebuild ghostscript-gnu, there is a huge list of printers/devices that I have to deselect. Is there any way of saving the build configuration for ghostscript-gnu so I don't have to do this every time? Tom Munro Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 21:29:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93A316A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:29:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxc1.crockettint.com (chameleon1.crockettint.com [206.224.72.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8E843D49 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:29:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emartinez@crockettint.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.crockettint.com [127.0.0.1]) by mxc1.crockettint.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3F036D97 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:29:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mxc1.crockettint.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mxc1.crockettint.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80689-08 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:29:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from memnoch (ausc1.crockettint.com [24.153.230.82]) by mxc1.crockettint.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A6036D95 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:29:54 -0500 (CDT) From: "Edgar Martinez" To: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:29:54 -0500 Organization: Crockett International MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcU5XXELAyWBzxxCQOiUSR3B6OL+Pw== Message-Id: <20050404212954.81A6036D95@mxc1.crockettint.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at crockettint.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Promise TX2 Rebuild via atacontrol?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: emartinez@crockettint.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:29:58 -0000 All, I have a failed member in a RAID1 array and using atacontrol can see that the status is degraded. I am curious if I can use atacontrol to rebuild the array if the original array was built using the Promise BIOS utility. If I tell atacontrol to rebuild.will it corrupt my data or catch fire and explode?? Cheers! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 22:06:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAF816A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:06:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262CE43D48 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:06:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rmarella@gmail.com) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (cpe-66-8-191-104.hawaii.res.rr.com [66.8.191.104])j34M5xFf029227 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:06:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4251BA47.2030901@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:05:59 -1000 From: Robert Marella User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050326 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------010300070301040702090800" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: ipflog entries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:06:03 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010300070301040702090800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings My daily mail on my firewall (5.3-rel-p4) has always shown many (> 10000) blocks by my blocking rule "block in quick on em0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any". Obviously I'm using ipf/ipnat. So, for education, today I enabled "log" for a short time on that rule. Within a few minutes I logged over twenty attempts from the same address. (Sample below, text attached) 04/04/2005 11:33:41.034653 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:33:41.973120 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 344 IN 04/04/2005 11:33:57.532249 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:33:58.963415 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 344 IN Ports 67 shows dhcps and 68 shows dhcpc in /etc/services. em0 is connected to my roadrunner cable modem. Is the cable modem doing this or is someone spoofing this IP address? Sorry if this has been answered already but I'm kind of new to the firewall stuff. Thank you for your time. Robert --------------010300070301040702090800 Content-Type: text/plain; name="log.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="log.txt" 04/04/2005 11:32:13.544747 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:32:22.045132 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:32:38.544230 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:33:23.043437 2x em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:33:25.553000 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:33:27.822447 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:33:29.962973 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 344 IN 04/04/2005 11:33:32.535749 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:33:34.952726 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 344 IN 04/04/2005 11:33:38.027073 em0 @0:6 b 218.83.155.71,55197 -> 66.8.191.104,1029 PR udp len 20 459 IN 04/04/2005 11:33:41.034653 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:33:41.973120 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 344 IN 04/04/2005 11:33:57.532249 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:33:58.963415 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 344 IN 04/04/2005 11:34:27.203702 2x em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 341 IN 04/04/2005 11:34:34.461616 em0 @0:6 b 24.90.91.53,15851 -> 66.8.191.104,42 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 04/04/2005 11:34:37.463380 em0 @0:6 b 24.90.91.53,15851 -> 66.8.191.104,42 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 04/04/2005 11:34:42.021349 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:34:42.804996 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:34:44.532057 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:34:46.807355 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:34:51.521685 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:35:00.022081 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:35:16.541624 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:35:36.322489 2x em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 342 IN 04/04/2005 11:35:59.813198 2x em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 353 IN 04/04/2005 11:36:01.020881 2x em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:36:03.510580 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:36:05.801901 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:36:10.510708 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:36:19.010118 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:36:35.511583 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:37:08.834639 em0 @0:6 b 60.34.114.40,2861 -> 66.8.191.104,5554 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 04/04/2005 11:37:09.835071 em0 @0:6 b 60.34.114.40,3093 -> 66.8.191.104,1023 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 04/04/2005 11:37:11.841033 em0 @0:6 b 60.34.114.40,3634 -> 66.8.191.104,9898 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN 04/04/2005 11:37:21.010605 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:37:21.788276 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:37:23.499794 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:37:25.791626 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:37:30.509418 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:37:38.999829 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN 04/04/2005 11:37:55.499265 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 PR udp len 20 337 IN gateway# --------------010300070301040702090800-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 22:30:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E902A16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:30:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpq2.home.nl (smtpq2.home.nl [213.51.128.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CB343D48 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:30:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from [213.51.128.133] (port=57403 helo=smtp2.home.nl) by smtpq2.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DIa5F-0006ls-QN for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:30:13 +0200 Received: from cp464173-a.dbsch1.nb.home.nl ([84.27.215.228]:54078 helo=desktop.homenet) by smtp2.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DIa5D-0008RV-NN for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:30:11 +0200 From: Danny Pansters To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:29:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <4251BA47.2030901@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4251BA47.2030901@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504050029.57829.danny@ricin.com> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Re: ipflog entries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:30:16 -0000 On Tuesday 05 April 2005 00:05, Robert Marella wrote: > Greetings > > My daily mail on my firewall (5.3-rel-p4) has always shown many (> > 10000) blocks by my blocking rule > "block in quick on em0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any". Obviously I'm using > ipf/ipnat. > > So, for education, today I enabled "log" for a short time on that rule. > Within a few minutes I logged over twenty > attempts from the same address. (Sample below, text attached) > > 04/04/2005 11:33:41.034653 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 > PR udp len 20 337 IN > 04/04/2005 11:33:41.973120 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 > PR udp len 20 344 IN > 04/04/2005 11:33:57.532249 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 > PR udp len 20 337 IN > 04/04/2005 11:33:58.963415 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 > PR udp len 20 344 IN > > Ports 67 shows dhcps and 68 shows dhcpc in /etc/services. > > em0 is connected to my roadrunner cable modem. Is the cable modem doing > this or is someone spoofing this IP address? > > Sorry if this has been answered already but I'm kind of new to the > firewall stuff. > > Thank you for your time. > Robert It's your cable provider insisting to send you bootps info (for broken windows customers I reckon). Yech that's as if you're some network appliance :) Mine does that too. I just drop/not log them. Whenever your dhclient needs to renew a lease it will connect and if your firewall keeps state on that your ISP's dhcp server has it's lucky moment because for once something may connect back in. Both of you happy. HTH, Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 22:30:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2482416A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:30:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.z-axis.com (mx1.z-axis.com [66.77.193.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B430A43D41 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:30:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from justin@z-axis.com) Received: (qmail 58503 invoked by uid 89); 4 Apr 2005 22:30:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (justin@10.140.4.32) by mx1.z-axis.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2005 22:30:48 -0000 Message-ID: <4251C00E.1050108@z-axis.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:30:38 -0700 From: Justin Bennett Organization: Z-Axis, Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Hackers X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: iSCSI (revisited?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:30:49 -0000 All, I was wondering what people thought of iSCSI and FreeBSD. Is it a viable option for creating SANs? I want to move away from tape backups, and have numerous production FreeBSD machines that I need to back up data from. Any other ideas for a disk to disk backup solution that people have used? Thanks, Justin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 22:31:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C700216A4CE; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:31:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.smartbit.ru (212.44.95.66.satgate.net [212.44.95.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167A543D58; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:31:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from filter@smartbit.ru) Received: by mail.smartbit.ru (Postfix, from userid 1025) id 167BD1B86B; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:31:54 +0400 (MSD) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by mail.smartbit.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250381B864 for <_@smartbit.ru>; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:31:53 +0400 (MSD) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3716568FF; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:31:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB8F16A50B; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:30:58 +0000 (GMT) Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2606D16A4CF for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:30:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.z-axis.com (mx1.z-axis.com [66.77.193.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B446743D48 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:30:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from justin@z-axis.com) Received: (qmail 58503 invoked by uid 89); 4 Apr 2005 22:30:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (justin@10.140.4.32) by mx1.z-axis.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2005 22:30:48 -0000 Message-ID: <4251C00E.1050108@z-axis.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:30:38 -0700 From: Justin Bennett Organization: Z-Axis, Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Hackers X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail.smartbit.ru X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: iSCSI (revisited?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:31:55 -0000 All, I was wondering what people thought of iSCSI and FreeBSD. Is it a viable option for creating SANs? I want to move away from tape backups, and have numerous production FreeBSD machines that I need to back up data from. Any other ideas for a disk to disk backup solution that people have used? Thanks, Justin _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 22:36:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C893C16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:36:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from omc2-s36.bay6.hotmail.com (omc2-s36.bay6.hotmail.com [65.54.249.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DE343D39 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:36:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soneraoyj@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.247.29]) by OMC2-S36.phx.gbl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:45:42 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:45:42 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 62.241.231.122 by by2fd.bay2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:45:41 GMT X-Originating-IP: [62.241.231.122] X-Originating-Email: [soneraoyj@hotmail.com] X-Sender: soneraoyj@hotmail.com From: "Sonera Oyj" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:45:41 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Apr 2005 19:45:42.0148 (UTC) FILETIME=[B829CC40:01C53885] Subject: installation ok, then what? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:36:35 -0000 Hi I need freeBSD for really stupid dummies style assistant. I´ve managed to install bsd, and gotten as far as the Welcome to free BSD screen my questoin; at the # what am I supposed to type there to start it, the OS, (in KDE)? Typing Login root or username and password only result in the welcome to bsd screen... Thanx in advance _________________________________________________________________ On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 22:37:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4B216A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:37:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from omc1-s17.bay6.hotmail.com (omc1-s17.bay6.hotmail.com [65.54.248.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AEB43D55 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:37:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iain_dooley@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.185.31]) by OMC1-S17.phx.gbl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:44:44 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:44:44 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 220.237.12.31 by by15fd.bay15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 03:44:44 GMT X-Originating-IP: [220.237.12.31] X-Originating-Email: [iain_dooley@hotmail.com] X-Sender: iain_dooley@hotmail.com From: "Iain Dooley" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:44:44 +0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Apr 2005 03:44:44.0441 (UTC) FILETIME=[797DE890:01C537FF] Subject: Maintaining a Minimal Installation for a Small HDD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:37:55 -0000 hi there, i'm currently running FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE on a Thinkpad 586, with a 1GB HDD and something like 48 MB of ram, with a pentium 133 processor. there is no CD drive, so i installed from floppies via FTP and selected 'minimal' installation, and didn't install any of the ports or src. i now want to upgrade to 5.3 (for various reasons) and i want to have a source tree that i can use to maintain my system via cvsup. in my stable-supfile, i commented out src-all, and then selected only the packages that i thought i would need. i commented out src-contrib, but this produced an error that make did not know how to build bool-array.cc. src-contrib is very large, and there are loads and loads of programs in there that i don't need for this machine (i am really only ever going to use the laptop to ssh into another computer on my network at home and from uni over the wireless network... it's just a portable terminal). i'm pretty confident that i could select what i need, (ie. i think i could go into contrib and select only the programs that i want to install) but i don't really know how to do it. do i need to edit the Makefiles? how can i cvsup only those programs in contrib that i need? my aim here is to have a compact source tree that i can use cvsup to keep current, but only takes up a couple of hundred meg. i'm not sure where to start. the handbook is usually a good place to start but i don't know the best section to look in. any help would be greatly appreciated. cheers iain _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 22:43:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27CA16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:43:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from omc1-s7.bay6.hotmail.com (omc1-s7.bay6.hotmail.com [65.54.248.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9388343D31 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:43:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spiraleyedgirl@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.175.33]) by OMC1-S7.phx.gbl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 2 Apr 2005 15:50:55 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 15:50:55 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.175.200 by by104fd.bay104.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 23:50:54 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.54.175.200] X-Originating-Email: [spiraleyedgirl@hotmail.com] X-Sender: spiraleyedgirl@hotmail.com From: "Spiral Eyed Girl" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 15:50:54 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Apr 2005 23:50:55.0187 (UTC) FILETIME=[CF67A230:01C537DE] Subject: More BSD/KDE Sound Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:43:47 -0000 I got sound working correctly with my SoundBlaster Audigy MP3+, but I have a problem with sound quality. It sounds hollow, like you are listening to really loud headphones a few feet away from you. Has anyone experienced this problem (with or without an audigy card), and do you have any solutions? I know SBA support for freebsd is new, but I need to know if I setup something wrong, or if it's just because support is new and incomplete. Thanks S. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 22:45:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71A916A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:45:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEFF43D2F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:45:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rmarella@gmail.com) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (cpe-66-8-191-104.hawaii.res.rr.com [66.8.191.104])j34MjYX7016524; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4251C38D.6020002@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:45:33 -1000 From: Robert Marella User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050326 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Danny Pansters References: <4251BA47.2030901@gmail.com> <200504050029.57829.danny@ricin.com> In-Reply-To: <200504050029.57829.danny@ricin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipflog entries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:45:37 -0000 Danny Pansters wrote: >On Tuesday 05 April 2005 00:05, Robert Marella wrote: > > >>Greetings >> >>My daily mail on my firewall (5.3-rel-p4) has always shown many (> >>10000) blocks by my blocking rule >>"block in quick on em0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any". Obviously I'm using >>ipf/ipnat. >> >>So, for education, today I enabled "log" for a short time on that rule. >>Within a few minutes I logged over twenty >>attempts from the same address. (Sample below, text attached) >> >>04/04/2005 11:33:41.034653 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 >>PR udp len 20 337 IN >>04/04/2005 11:33:41.973120 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 >>PR udp len 20 344 IN >>04/04/2005 11:33:57.532249 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 >>PR udp len 20 337 IN >>04/04/2005 11:33:58.963415 em0 @0:3 b 10.96.0.1,67 -> 255.255.255.255,68 >>PR udp len 20 344 IN >> >>Ports 67 shows dhcps and 68 shows dhcpc in /etc/services. >> >>em0 is connected to my roadrunner cable modem. Is the cable modem doing >>this or is someone spoofing this IP address? >> >>Sorry if this has been answered already but I'm kind of new to the >>firewall stuff. >> >>Thank you for your time. >>Robert >> >> > >It's your cable provider insisting to send you bootps info (for broken windows >customers I reckon). Yech that's as if you're some network appliance :) Mine >does that too. I just drop/not log them. Whenever your dhclient needs to >renew a lease it will connect and if your firewall keeps state on that your >ISP's dhcp server has it's lucky moment because for once something may >connect back in. Both of you happy. > >HTH, > >Dan > > > Thanks Dan. I kinda thunk it was something like that. Just wanted someone such as yourself to confirm. The sheer number that was reported in the daily mail was what got me concerned. I was and am just dropping them. I only enabled the log for about 5 minutes. Thanks again Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 22:46:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C971B16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:46:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0BB43D3F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:46:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1336138rng for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:46:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=D/h5fWm6uOUjuaEllUkmeRtjVo4+6IQkzia6J2LjiW9HHEdcW93BCm2Zzs7vPLNuD7MsHtk/pHt69Ag+y32g7ixaqQXfTlQIEKCSb1zyzPHBRaZ2lE+anXHEFaCrDWs+aS3oj4pXf4oXCfe0zo3SfBzx/9ZsxTsFJeEgTY5rkhU= Received: by 10.38.13.39 with SMTP id 39mr5726617rnm; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:46:52 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: infofarmer@mail.ru In-Reply-To: <42519B5A.2040209@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <42519B5A.2040209@mail.ru> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:46:53 -0000 On Apr 4, 2005 9:54 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > Gert Cuykens wrote: > > On Apr 4, 2005 12:04 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > > > >>Gert Cuykens wrote: > >> > >>>Who do i ask if he / she would like to put this to the distribution list > >>> > >>>[ ] cvsupdate-nogui > >>> > >>>Cant we make some user freebsd-voting list were we can vote for changes :) > >> > >>Come to think about it, I kinda miss this option, too. > > > > Alrighdy thats 2 votes already :) > > I say we go to the california and go run in circles holding a cvsup pannel :) > > BTW, I'd also vote for /etc/rc.d/ftpd script > Is the only way to setup a ftp by enabeling inetd ? If so i want a /etc/rc.d/ftpd script too PS Does sftp mean sshd + ftpd ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 22:50:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6A916A4CF; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:50:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skipjack.no-such-agency.net (skipjack.no-such-agency.net [64.142.114.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B0C43D67; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:50:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jpp@cloudview.com) Received: from skipjack.no-such-agency.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by skipjack.no-such-agency.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C4F34DA11; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.120] (blackhole.no-such-agency.net [64.142.103.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by skipjack.no-such-agency.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9B134DA0F; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:50:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4251C4CE.7030906@cloudview.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:50:54 -0700 From: John Pettitt User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Justin Bennett References: <4251C00E.1050108@z-axis.com> In-Reply-To: <4251C00E.1050108@z-axis.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.1 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: by skipjack cc: FreeBSD Hackers cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: iSCSI (revisited?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:50:56 -0000 Justin Bennett wrote: > All, > > I was wondering what people thought of iSCSI and FreeBSD. Is it a > viable option for creating SANs? > > I want to move away from tape backups, and have numerous production > FreeBSD machines that I need to back up data from. > > Any other ideas for a disk to disk backup solution that people have used? > > Thanks, > > Justin > For disk-to-disk backup take a look at BackupPC (don't let the name fool you it supports *nix clients). The nice thing about BackupPC is it does file pooling which saves *a lot* of space. John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 22:54:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F8216A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:54:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from teemfws1.spt.com (teemfws1.spt.com [199.103.143.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422E743D2F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:54:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from JBOMGARD@stpaultravelers.com) X-Server-Uuid: 4486F523-8452-46E7-A869-D7093D940DD9 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:53:59 -0500 Message-ID: <9BC9288098C55A46B392908FB05FD09B25AC6C@TDEXB0VC.prod.travp.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: installation ok, then what? Thread-Index: AcU5ZtrfoO13j4hqQS2GjPmiF9GOPgAAYNyQ From: "Bomgardner,Jon " To: "Sonera Oyj" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Apr 2005 22:54:00.0659 (UTC) FILETIME=[31038230:01C53969] X-WSS-ID: 6E4F1A074P4530543-03-04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: installation ok, then what? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:54:16 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Sonera Oyj [mailto:soneraoyj@hotmail.com]=20 > Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 2:46 PM > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org > Subject: installation ok, then what=3F >=20 >=20 > Hi > I need freeBSD for really stupid dummies style assistant. > I=B4ve managed to install bsd, and gotten as far as the > Welcome to free BSD screen > my questoin; at the # what am I supposed to type there to=20 > start it, the OS, =20 > (in KDE)=3F > Typing Login root or username and password only result in the=20 > welcome to bsd=20 > screen... >=20 > Thanx in advance Provided that you've installed and configures the X system = (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x11.html), and = installed KDE (following the directions on KDE's site: = http://docs.kde.org/en/HEAD/kdebase/quickstart/ is a good place to start) = you can can just type startx. However, for a "dummies style assistant" I = would suggest using kdm, which is the KDE system login (much akin to the = windows login screen). You can find info for this at: = http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x11-wm.html HTH, Jon Bomgardner >=20 > _________________________________________________________________ > On the road to retirement=3F Check out MSN Life Events for=20 > advice on how to=20 > get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx=3Fcid=3DRetirement >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to=20 > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 >=20 >=20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D This communication, together with any attachments hereto or links contained= = herein, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain = information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the = intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, = copying, dissemination, distribution or use of this communication is = STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this communication in error, = please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail message and delete th= e= original and all copies of the communication, along with any attachments = hereto or links herein, from your system. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D The St. Paul Travelers e-mail system made this annotation on 04/04/05, = 18:54:10. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 22:59:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B964016A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:59:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFC543D1D for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:59:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1112.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0C6151C000AE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:59:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1112.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E8D291C000AB for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:59:09 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050404225909953.E8D291C000AB@mwinf1112.wanadoo.fr Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:59:09 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <618393426.20050405005909@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <1391.24.118.72.147.1112561507.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> <42509308.9050506@fusemail.com> <583804515.20050404061243@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: just got DSL, can't surf or get mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:59:11 -0000 cape canaveral writes: > dhclient will overwrite /etc/resolv.conf on boot Then perhaps dhclient.conf is the culprit; an alternative is to stop running dhclient, but only if the machine's own IP address is static. -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 23:09:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C886716A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:09:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skipjack.no-such-agency.net (skipjack.no-such-agency.net [64.142.114.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7847743D48 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:09:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jpp@cloudview.com) Received: from skipjack.no-such-agency.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by skipjack.no-such-agency.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A2A34DA11; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.120] (blackhole.no-such-agency.net [64.142.103.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by skipjack.no-such-agency.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E195534DA0F; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:09:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4251C915.1000009@cloudview.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:09:09 -0700 From: John Pettitt User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cpghost@cordula.ws References: <20050404091719.GA9748@lothlorien.nagual.st> <20050404093755.GA48928@epia2.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <20050404093755.GA48928@epia2.farid-hajji.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.1 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-AV-Checked: by skipjack Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: HZ=1000 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 23:09:10 -0000 cpghost@cordula.ws wrote: > >Interestingly, HZ=100 has remained constant for decades (!), despite >CPUs getting faster all the time. This is an excellent value for most >typical usage patterns. Cranking it up should only be required for >special cases. Anyway, the HZ knob is there. Experiment with it until >you get optimal performance. > > > > > > In the dim and distant past (like 1983) some systems used HZ=50 or HZ=60 depending on where in the world they were. I used an MP/M based box that took it's clock tick from the power line (no good RTC hardware available but the power company keeps pretty good time). John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 00:11:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8D016A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:11:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from stelesys.com (web1.stelesys.com [63.175.100.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770CC43D1D for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:11:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=www.stelesys.com) by stelesys.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1DIbf8-000A8s-GA; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:11:22 -0400 Received: from 24.98.86.57 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jbell@stelesys.com); by www.stelesys.com with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:11:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4218.24.98.86.57.1112659882.squirrel@24.98.86.57> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:11:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jerry Bell" To: "Chip Wiegand" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: FreeBSD List Subject: Re: screwy network/dmz problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:11:28 -0000 The first thing I would check is that it's the BSD box that you are actually pinging. I'd try unplugging it and trying the ping again from the IIS box. Barring that, I would double and triple check the network mask on the BSD box. Also, make sure you don't have some screwy firewall rules on the BSD server that prevent outbound pings. Next, look at the output of 'netstat -rn' You should see entries for the default gateway as well as your local network. If all looks good there, check your arp table with arp -a. If you don't see anything there, it's probably a layer 1 or 2 problem (cabling/vlan). There are many many possibilities for what could be wrong, but it's hard for us to say. Let us know what you find on those tests. Jerry http://www.syslog.org > here in our office we have a firewall running Firewall-1 (it is > administered remotely from another office in another country). It is set > up with a dmz so I can host a web server (which is running IIS), but it > works. I am now adding another web server, running Apache/FreeBSD. Problem > is the FBSD box does not ping anything. The IIS box can ping the FBSD box > and get a response from it. I have used the same network settings on the > FBSD box that are on the IIS box, changing only the ipaddress. I don't > understand why the FBSD box only responds with network not found when > trying to ping anything. Now the IIS box is not a member of any network, > it is it's own workgroup called DMZ. Is the problem that the FBSD box > needs to be a member of the workgroup DMZ? And if so, how do I get it > there? > > Regards, > Chip > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 00:23:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9883C16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:23:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from omc1-s40.bay6.hotmail.com (omc1-s40.bay6.hotmail.com [65.54.248.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C211643D1F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:23:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from texas_consultant@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([64.4.31.14]) by omc1-s40.bay6.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:21:32 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:21:32 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 67.10.73.69 by by13fd.bay13.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:21:31 GMT X-Originating-IP: [67.10.73.69] X-Originating-Email: [texas_consultant@hotmail.com] X-Sender: texas_consultant@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <20050404100310.B5AA216A4DD@hub.freebsd.org> From: "Texas Consultant" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:21:31 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Apr 2005 00:21:32.0079 (UTC) FILETIME=[6B1A9BF0:01C53975] Subject: RE: New Freebsd Install Guide Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:23:08 -0000 Many people who are involved in FreeBSD are not programmers. The Project includes documentation writers, Web designers, and support people. All that these people need to contribute is an investment of time and a willingness to learn. 1. Read through the FAQ and Handbook periodically. If anything is badly explained, out of date or even just completely wrong, let us know. Even better, send us a fix (SGML is not difficult to learn, but there is no objection to ASCII submissions). http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributing/index.html -- I think this is great, but there should be a project leader to regulate overall structure of the Handbook and other documents as that is perhaps where the greatest amount of work is needed. Could we at least have a mailing list for writers? >Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 01:03:24 -0400 >From: >Subject: RE: New Freebsd Install Guide Available >To: "Chris Hill" >Cc: Randy Pratt >Message-ID: >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >As stated in the content displayed by those URL's the Install guide >is free to anyone to download and very plainly states the content is >contributed to public domain. >So why are so many people asking the same question when the answer >is so self evident? > >And this writer takes offence to anybody calling the promoting of >this Install guide as verbally trashing the handbook. >I don't need to do that. Many others have done that over the years. >Any regular reader of the list will know that the handbook content >has had many people voicing concern over its less than basic >ability to convey meaningful instructions. No need to open that >flame war again. > >The bottom line is the firewall section of this Install guide has >been lifted and used to replace the FreeBSD official handbook's >complete firewall section all ready. Any body can lift any part of >the install guide and put forth their own effort to use it as source >to replace other sections of the official handbook. There is nothing >stopping you so go for it. > >This Install guide has a much more meaningful index which is right >there all the time helping the reader to navigate the guides >different subjects. The presentation method of the index and >content on split screen is more in line with modern web content that >every ones sees these days. Plus the install Guide progresses in an >step by step manner from installing the base default system all the >way up to configurating a private LAN which can masquerade as a >commercial user. This address the desired server configuration most >often wanted by the majority the first time posters to this >questions list. > >Another important niche this FreeBSD Install Guide covers is that it >is downloadable direct to ms/window boxes and can be viewed using >the ms/explorer browser. You UNIX purists have to accept the fact >that there are many ms/win users who want to be FreeBSD users and >dual win/FreeBSD users out there and this Install guide opens up a >bridge to the FreeBSD operating system to service this untapped >potential user group. Just watch the posts on the list for the >magnitude of ms/office top posters to bear out that truth. The >official handbook in its current format does not address this. Since >its 3/1//05 public domain release this install guide has been >visited 1500 times and downloaded 216 times. This was mostly from >people who responded from the UNIX news groups postings. > >The best thing for the FreeBSD doc group to do is request to be an >official mirror of the Install guide. Hay the Doc group will have >the best win win situation here. They get an alternate view of the >install process that is maintained outside of the FreeBSD project. >Much like the pf firewall has its own self maintained user guide. >Now this is something to think about. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 00:54:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE9116A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:54:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpq1.home.nl (smtpq1.home.nl [213.51.128.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E22F43D64 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:54:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from [213.51.128.134] (port=40176 helo=smtp3.home.nl) by smtpq1.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DIcKZ-0006Ml-66 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:54:11 +0200 Received: from cp464173-a.dbsch1.nb.home.nl ([84.27.215.228]:64650 helo=desktop.homenet) by smtp3.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DIcKV-0004Bv-Ot for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:54:07 +0200 From: Danny Pansters To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:53:53 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <42519B5A.2040209@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504050253.53879.danny@ricin.com> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Re: freebsd disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:54:13 -0000 On Tuesday 05 April 2005 00:46, Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Apr 4, 2005 9:54 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > > Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > On Apr 4, 2005 12:04 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > > >>Gert Cuykens wrote: > > >>>Who do i ask if he / she would like to put this to the distribution > > >>> list > > >>> > > >>>[ ] cvsupdate-nogui > > >>> > > >>>Cant we make some user freebsd-voting list were we can vote for > > >>> changes :) > > >> > > >>Come to think about it, I kinda miss this option, too. > > > > > > Alrighdy thats 2 votes already :) > > > I say we go to the california and go run in circles holding a cvsup > > > pannel :) > > > > BTW, I'd also vote for /etc/rc.d/ftpd script > > Is the only way to setup a ftp by enabeling inetd ? > If so i want a /etc/rc.d/ftpd script too Standard ftpd runs through inetd. > PS Does sftp mean sshd + ftpd ? Nope. It's a subsystem of sshd, its client interface only resembles ftp just as scp resembles rcp. Dan (please don't CC me) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 00:55:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1117316A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:55:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53908.mail.yahoo.com (web53908.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 805F343D5C for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:55:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stheg_olloydson@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 95420 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Apr 2005 00:55:04 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=UFwSB23Jp1nVAU3h11YeSiNkhwZJZ/IKAhlUqLyIIzwch52kKOraz1nHaAF/C3xXZK5+ad43fAh1bzHxoNguu0M4eERJXHuAdR7sotgwLZSjbLRSMsNfVCExFHgfccpmmdhQBK83pUzmaMXfHeFbxJAfuHWLDdVnN0BkwNQZC0w= ; Message-ID: <20050405005504.95418.qmail@web53908.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.157.24.232] by web53908.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:54:59 PDT Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT) From: stheg olloydson To: texas_consultant@hotmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: New Freebsd Install Guide Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:55:06 -0000 it was said: >I think this is great, but there should be a project leader to >regulate overall structure of the Handbook and other documents as >that is perhaps where the greatest amount of work is needed. Could >we at least have a mailing list for writers? Ask and you shall receive: freebsd-docs@freebsd.org http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/index.html Regards, stheg __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. http://personals.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 01:17:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4FE16A55C for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 01:17:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr (smtp9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA6B43D2F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 01:17:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0907.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id DBF611C00143 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 03:17:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0907.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C1ED31C00151 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 03:17:43 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050405011743794.C1ED31C00151@mwinf0907.wanadoo.fr Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 03:17:43 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1183736361.20050405031743@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Securely allowing just one application via telnet X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 01:17:45 -0000 If I want to allow external users to log on under only one permissible username, which immediately and unconditionally executes only one program (no shell access), via telnet, what is the most secure way to set this up? I've always understood telnet to be somewhat of a Pandora's box for security, but I don't know if that applies to the protocol itself, or to telnetd, or if it just refers to the many dangers of shell access, or what. If there is a way to secure this type of access, I'd like to try it on my test server (I won't risk the production server, of course), as an exercise in setting up custom environments. Any suggestions on how best to do this securely? If a specific user is restricted to a specific program at login (via /etc/passwd), is there _any_ way he can sneak out to a shell, assuming that the program he is forced to run does _not_ provide shellout access? -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 01:33:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC17916A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 01:33:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpq3.home.nl (smtpq3.home.nl [213.51.128.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A81743D2D for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 01:33:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from [213.51.128.133] (port=60851 helo=smtp2.home.nl) by smtpq3.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DIcwN-000792-Ds for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 03:33:15 +0200 Received: from cp464173-a.dbsch1.nb.home.nl ([84.27.215.228]:51310 helo=desktop.homenet) by smtp2.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DIcwM-0004AZ-4N for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 03:33:14 +0200 From: Danny Pansters To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 03:33:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504050333.00209.danny@ricin.com> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Temperature and fan speed on INTEL D925CV2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 01:33:16 -0000 I have an INTEL D925CV2 baord in my new box. Does anyone know if/how I can get temperature - fan speed - other measurements from it? (No, lmmon does not work) Thanks, Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 01:52:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7433C16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 01:52:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2A143D39 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 01:52:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from [192.168.42.22] (andersonbox2.centtech.com [192.168.42.22]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j351qYDX019587; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:52:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <4251EF40.4000605@centtech.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:52:00 -0500 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050325 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Justin Bennett References: <4251C00E.1050108@z-axis.com> In-Reply-To: <4251C00E.1050108@z-axis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.82/804/Mon Apr 4 09:38:58 2005 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: iSCSI (revisited?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 01:52:40 -0000 Justin Bennett wrote: > All, > > I was wondering what people thought of iSCSI and FreeBSD. Is it a viable > option for creating SANs? > > I want to move away from tape backups, and have numerous production > FreeBSD machines that I need to back up data from. > > Any other ideas for a disk to disk backup solution that people have used? You should check out rsnapshot. It does disk to disk backups either locally, or via ssh. I am using it to snapshot about 2TB of data to a 10TB (total) SAN, based on fiber channel. All FreeBSD backend, with assorted servers I'm backing up. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology A lost ounce of gold may be found, a lost moment of time never. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 02:17:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF2216A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:17:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41521.mail.yahoo.com (web41521.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.94.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD0F843D64 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:17:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from weichong78@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 24156 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Apr 2005 02:17:04 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=S8D/UJW8Cen9FHJN0tprz6wzNlKLxBsImrM1N0lKj2qky8zQI+Sq5ydde5nExUSWbNwckBQcf2/N5J7ZHgSCW6nkPTp5uZvFViSWmQn1TLbhlXfmGUvzhnwukAmYquJ3FiGt8wGGw4iHDqxoawMmSth9PHoFsCdf5YlPlWJ8B2o= ; Message-ID: <20050405021704.24154.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [210.19.15.130] by web41521.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 19:17:04 PDT Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:17:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Wei Chong To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: skype SOUND_MIXER_WRITE_IGAIN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:17:05 -0000 I recently install skype in FreeBSD via port. However, when people talk to me, I can only hear some "deformed" voice that sounds like cartoon. Below is the error message that I get: volume_adjust: SOUND_MIXER_WRITE_IGAIN failed: No such device or address I'm using FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE as of now, with KDE. Any help is appreciated Thank you. Yours sincerely, Tan, WeiChong. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. http://personals.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 02:22:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DFE16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:22:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A680143D39 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:22:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fewjr@adelphia.net) Received: from CTU ([69.174.145.177]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050405022231.PSCB2192.mta9.adelphia.net@CTU>; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:22:31 -0400 Message-ID: <003601c53986$5ed55f90$030a000a@CTU> From: "Francis Whittington" To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:22:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter.log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:22:32 -0000 Thank you very much for your reply. Your suggestions did the trick. I will read the Official handbook to see what else is different with 5.3. How did you know I was using 5.3. You answered one of my questions once before didn't you? Thanks Again fewjr/Buddy ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Francis Whittington" ; Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:29 PM Subject: RE: ipfilter.log > The answer is very simple. The integration of the open source > ipfilter firewall into FreeBSD has changed between the 4.x releases > and the 5.3 release just made available. If you change the > syslog.conf: > > Local0.* /var/log/ipfilter.log which is how 4.10 > & 4.11 work > > To > > security.* /var/log/ipfilter.log for 5.3 then every > thing will work as documented. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Francis > Whittington > Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 9:29 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: ipfilter.log > > Hi guys, > I've been following this guide: > http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php > So far I have gotten the firewall/router to work. Everything seems > to be okay, except I do not see anything being logged in > ipfilter.log. > I am using ipf.rules and ipnat.rules. I created ipfilter.log in > /var/log/ and I added this line to syslog.conf: > Local0.* /var/log/ipfilter.log > and I added the following line to newsyslog.conf for rotating the > log. > /var/log/ipfilter.log 600 5 100 $M1D0 J > I was wondering if anyone could tell me why I do not get anything in > my ipfilter.log. > > Thanks > fewjr/Buddy > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 02:45:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31AB16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:45:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx.dccnet.com (mx.dccnet.com [24.207.1.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B216F43D1D for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:45:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from canonalis@dccnet.com) Received: from [192.168.121.110] (unverified [24.207.88.142]) by mx4.dccnet.com (DCCNet Email Cluster) with ESMTP id 2434471 for multiple; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 19:45:29 -0700 Message-ID: <4251FBC8.8040203@dccnet.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 19:45:28 -0700 From: "Kevin G. Eliuk" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Taylor References: <42505AB3.6090602@infinitebubble.com> <42506B78.6050309@dccnet.com> <4250EA45.6060803@infinitebubble.com> In-Reply-To: <4250EA45.6060803@infinitebubble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Formating a 1680k floppy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:45:31 -0000 Jason Taylor wrote: > Kevin G. Eliuk wrote: > >> Are you sure you don't mean 1720k? Look at "/etc/disktab" for > > I'm sure. I get the same results trying to create a 1720k. > > %fdformat -f 1680 /dev/fd0 > fdformat: unknown format 1680 KB for drive type 1.44M > %fdformat -f 1720 /dev/fd0 > fdformat: unknown format 1720 KB for drive type 1.44M > %fdformat -s 21,,,,80 /dev/fd0 > Format 1680K floppy `/dev/fd0'? (y/n): y > Processing E^C-------------------------------------- > %fdformat -s 21,,,,82 /dev/fd0 > Format 1722K floppy `/dev/fd0'? (y/n): y > Processing E^C-------------------------------------- My mistake. ( I haven't looked at this procedure in a loooong while). I have just successful in creating a 1722 by: # fdcontrol -f 1722 /dev/fd0 # fdformat fd0 Format 1722K floppy `/dev/fd0'? (y/n): y Processing VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV done. Not sure about a 1680: # fdcontrol -v -f 1680 /dev/fd0 fdcontrol: unknown format 1680 KB for drive type 1.44M Hope this helps a bit. -- Cheers, Kevin. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 02:51:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C227B16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:51:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51002.mail.yahoo.com (web51002.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F65243D2D for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:51:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tfcheng@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 14512 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Apr 2005 02:51:22 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=JMPp1KCuKHMrsB5q/NEutwPApGiVpr6AR/6ah3iLLk4l90wdbIvZcuqIDb4R6/TRIWEnF80tujLNANGExCFjPIMlvI5KVZVEY+gF0D6G6wwk+8P5z1dbeD4mDPT1sotA5h9xsZVtG/9PKB0otJBqD8jI0wYiYxIlclShqAYbZfg= ; Message-ID: <20050405025122.14510.qmail@web51002.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.113.106.60] by web51002.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:51:22 CST Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:51:22 +0800 (CST) From: "T.F. Cheng" To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: can't make iso image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:51:23 -0000 Hi, I want to make ISO image in order to burn a CD, but both mkisofs and vcdimager failed to do so, mkisofs reported as: >>mkisofs: Input/output error. cannot read from foo.mpg while vcdimager said: >>**ERROR: fread (): Input/output error but other files have no problem making ISO by the 2 apps. This is on freebsd/i386, 5.4pre-release. thansk!! Best Regards, Tsu-Fan Cheng _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? µn°O§K¶Oªº @yahoo.com ¤¤¤å¹q¤l¶l¥ó @ http://chinese.mail.yahoo.com Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://chinese.mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 02:56:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1CE16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:56:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B41843D55 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:56:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian@thekinseys.net) Received: from VAIO ([65.13.29.31]) by imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050405025630.CMFW2394.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net@VAIO> for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:56:30 -0400 From: "Brian Kinsey" To: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:56:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20050403000019.SPYA2549.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@VAIO> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcU3tepV+IjQNrc2TYSraQp7kr26ZAAKUYIAAGqc2qA= Message-Id: <20050405025630.CMFW2394.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net@VAIO> Subject: RE: video resolution with kde X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:56:32 -0000 I have this partially working now. In my xorg.conf file, I added HorizSync 31.5-82.5 and VertRefresh 50-90 in the "Monitor" section. In the "Screen" section, I added DefaultDepth 24 and in the "Display" Subsection with Depth 24, I added Modes "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" Now the only resolution that works correctly is 1280x1024. This is much better than the 640x480 that I had before, but I'd like to use 1024x768. When I go into Configure Desktop and set the Display Screen Size to anything other than 1280x1024, my screen gets disoriented. There is a break about three quarters through the screen and part of the windows display on one side and the rest displays on the other side of the break. I can't find the correct VertRefresh and HorizSync settings on Dell's website, so I've been messing with settings that I found that someone else used on an older version of FreeBDS with XFree86. Would this problem be caused by the VertRefresh? Any tips on what I can change? -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Brian Kinsey Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 7:00 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: video resolution with kde I just installed FreeBSD 5.3 on my laptop (Dell Latitude D600) and set up KDE 3.3. When I go into the desktop configuration, the only screen size I have is 640x480. What do I need to do to get a higher resolution? I believe the video card is an ATI Mobility Radeon 9000, but I can't seem to find FreeBSD drivers for it. Sorry if I didn't include enough info here, I am very new to this. Thanks, Brian _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 03:07:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A978316A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 03:07:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444D243D45 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 03:07:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1368108rng for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:07:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=c72qkyPn3jFMCSEjtyaVRLvfa3MUiFES++le5cKLdLNFttDLYgsOcCL7FWbAKlShw7WVNzRHQkYSS/bKESKtqCC5qiogXGawfn0nfnHfMANklIU2ahvcdhJYQ8U89wd4586tqxNvd6PcYGwC0PVvwZmw06Bl0Fm6Z18LjwcYErI= Received: by 10.38.69.34 with SMTP id r34mr320335rna; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 05:07:34 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: Danny Pansters In-Reply-To: <200504050253.53879.danny@ricin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200504050253.53879.danny@ricin.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 03:07:35 -0000 On Apr 5, 2005 2:53 AM, Danny Pansters wrote: > On Tuesday 05 April 2005 00:46, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > On Apr 4, 2005 9:54 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > > > Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > > On Apr 4, 2005 12:04 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > > > >>Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > >>>Who do i ask if he / she would like to put this to the distribution > > > >>> list > > > >>> > > > >>>[ ] cvsupdate-nogui > > > >>> > > > >>>Cant we make some user freebsd-voting list were we can vote for > > > >>> changes :) > > > >> > > > >>Come to think about it, I kinda miss this option, too. > > > > > > > > Alrighdy thats 2 votes already :) > > > > I say we go to the california and go run in circles holding a cvsup > > > > pannel :) > > > > > > BTW, I'd also vote for /etc/rc.d/ftpd script > > > > Is the only way to setup a ftp by enabeling inetd ? > > If so i want a /etc/rc.d/ftpd script too > > Standard ftpd runs through inetd. > > > PS Does sftp mean sshd + ftpd ? > > Nope. It's a subsystem of sshd, its client interface only resembles ftp just > as scp resembles rcp. > i that case i dont need ftpd :) so i change my vote to leave all the insecurity in one big insecure inetd server :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 03:09:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2821416A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 03:09:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.nativenerds.com (host-70-0-111-24.midco.net [24.111.0.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6E143D39 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 03:09:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from estover@nativenerds.com) Received: from red (host-14-37-230-24.midco.net [24.230.37.14]) j353LOpN094894 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:21:24 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from estover@nativenerds.com) From: Ed Stover To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Native Nerds Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:09:03 -0600 Message-Id: <1112670543.7176.3.camel@red.nativenerds.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail.nativenerds.com Subject: Re: sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: estover@nativenerds.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 03:09:08 -0000 Ok, you could try something like this ;) # # cat movie.mpg | mail person@sumplace.com -s "This wont work ;)" # On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 02:47 +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote: > i want to send a movie to a friend ? How do you do that with sendmail > ? I know i know i read the man but its like this > [------------------------------------] long > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 04:01:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0DB16A4CE; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:01:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB2B43D3F; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:01:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j353xqb03627; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:59:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Jerry McAllister" , Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:59:36 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200504041401.j34E1Wr00485@clunix.cl.msu.edu> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Importance: Normal cc: Randy Pratt cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: dot.icabod@gmail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: New Freebsd Install Guide Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 04:01:24 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jerry > McAllister > Well, both types of documentation are needed. The official formal > documentation, which, of necessity , needs to be written in a rather > formal language style and other explanitory docs for newbies and > those of us who need a more conversational and step by step style > at least to get started at things. There are several good books > out with more conversational style and some reasonable web sites > with tutorials. > > The only problem with many of the web sites and even the books is > that they tend to take a personal preference prejucidial attitude > toward things rather than encouraging readers to try out various > things and giving them instruction toward those other choices. > Some examples are installing and using Gnome. To read some guides, > one would think it is impossible to run FreeBSD without Gnome. > Some seem to imply it is absolutely necessary to install a third > party MBR/boot manager such as Grub to boot FreeBSD, just because > they like it. Some tend to think the only possible shell to use > is bash or sh and anyone using something else can't possibly get their > work done. The list could go on. > That sort of thing may be present in some books but it wasn't in mine. I will say one thing though, that a 3rd party book must specialize on some aspect of FreeBSD if people are going to buy it. People that buy documentation usually have a more specific need than that they just want to boot FreeBSD on whatever spare PC they have lying around. So, for example in my book all examples were Bourne shell, because the focus of the book wasn't on running shells under UNIX. However I never wrote in the book that that readers should only use Bourne. In fact, on the section on system administration I specifically said Bourne and csh wern't optimal for new users, and tcsh and bash were more popular, followed by an overview of the major shells. Please be careful where your swinging that tarpot and brush in the future. Ted Mittelstaedt Author, The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide. http://www.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 04:13:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E773B16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:13:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9139B43D53 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:13:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1375555rng for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:13:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fcqjVBuoNO+/a16MwDe4Dt5I2oyJIe7DW7l+ml+WBy1Ijd7HKMIniZkbWBFu0olG20Pl6XIMJqGh6z2FDfyy6mXA05Gd3WC/QguAOY/jzo4CIxAJI/LeT+rvE7Q5Hwz9UEJ25lePlLzIqDmLVwLiyiEQ/CX+Fj1i+L4l1WSBZlQ= Received: by 10.38.151.1 with SMTP id y1mr5978644rnd; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 06:13:56 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: efax with a serial 3com us robotics 56k modem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 04:13:57 -0000 yes i read the manual :P I have been reading about ppp and about sio and scrolled trough the big man efax The good news is TB-14R dmesg | grep sio usb0: USB revision 1.0 usb1: USB revision 1.0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A TB-14R The bad news is that there is no fax tutorial for freebsd dummies :) And i dont know wich serial port is sio0 or sio1 I connected the fax to god knows wich sio and said "ok modem start faxing" hoping for a mirical the sio was plug and play detected the fax and conected it with my email client so i could sent and receive faxes. Ps can you setup tty terminal trough usb ? It would be cool if i could replace my vidiocart with a usb cable :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 04:48:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D1416A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:48:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gizmo05ps.bigpond.com (gizmo05ps.bigpond.com [144.140.71.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01AD343D39 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:48:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon.bennet@natsoft.biz) Received: (qmail 2988 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2005 04:48:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO psmam07.bigpond.com) (144.135.25.87) by gizmo05ps.bigpond.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2005 04:48:11 -0000 Received: from cpe-60-231-180-42.vic.bigpond.net.au ([60.231.180.42]) by psmam07.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 119/31814395) with SMTP id 31814395; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:48:11 +1000 From: "Simon Bennet" To: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:48:19 +1000 Message-ID: <000201c5399a$b3427130$5a8d27cb@SimonHP> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: ast0: FAILURE - REZERO timed out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 04:48:17 -0000 We are using Freebsd 5.2.1-STABLE The device inquestion is a SEAGATE STT3401A IDE tape drive The message "ast0: FAILURE - REZERO timed out" appears on the console but does not seem to affect the system, however the error shouldn't display. Can anyone assist please. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 05:16:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D36816A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 05:16:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rdsor.ro (mail.rdsor.ro [193.231.238.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C7743D41 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 05:16:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cristi.tudose@rdsor.ro) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rdsor.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE49010F7D for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:17:24 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail.rdsor.ro ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06559-01-61 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:17:24 +0300 (EEST) Received: from fileserver (unknown [82.77.49.66]) by mail.rdsor.ro (Postfix) with SMTP id 2008B10D5C for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:17:24 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <001a01c5398d$de2d7460$6101a8c0@fileserver> From: "Cristi Tudose" To: "FreeBSD Questions" Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:16:32 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Scanned: by antivirus at rdsor.ro Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Tyan Tiger i7320 - Free BSD install faild X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 05:16:58 -0000 Hi. Please, I need a little help !!! I have buy'd a PC with: Tyan Tiger i7320 MB, 2*2,8 Xeon Processors=20 High Point Rocket Raid 1640 4*250Gb WD Hdd's 1Gb Memory =20 CD-RW - Asus CRW-5232AS I want to install a FreeBSD 5.3. The boot process is starting very well, but when he try to detect the = devices connected to the two ata channel, I recive this error: ata0-MASTER: FAILURE - ATAPI IDENTIFI ERROR Time out (probably the = cdrom) ata2-MASTER: FAILURE - ATA IDENTIFI ERROR Time out ata3-MASTER: FAILURE - ATA IDENTIFI ERROR Time out ata4-MASTER: FAILURE - ATA IDENTIFI ERROR Time out ata5-MASTER: FAILURE - ATA IDENTIFI ERROR Time out ata6-MASTER: FAILURE - ATA IDENTIFI ERROR Time out I so a standard install,=20 I set up the partitions, in the select media, chose CD-ROM/DVD but the sysintsall tell me there is no cd/dvd-rom i have made a bios update. But this don't resolve my prolem :( I have try to remove the HPT Rocket Raid 1640, and than to install the = FreeBSD, but the error don't dispare. ata0-MASTER: FAILURE - ATAPI IDENTIFI ERROR Time out=20 I have tryed to install the FreeBSD 5.3 with other 4 cd-roms. But with = no success. Is a bug in FreeBSD ? Or is a Hardware error ? The Windows 2000 and XP work fine. I have installed both for test. Please help me !!! Any sugestion is helpfull. With Friendship Cristian Tudose P.S. Excuse my english knowlege From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 05:22:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2CE16A4CF for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 05:22:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC96A43D67 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 05:22:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DIgUX-00025R-At for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:20:45 +0200 Received: from 63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net ([63.224.222.139]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:20:45 +0200 Received: from sergei by 63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:20:45 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Sergei Gnezdov Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 2 Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Digital Cameras X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: sergei@gnezdov.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 05:22:59 -0000 Is there a chance to get digital camers working with FreeBSD? All I need is load images from camera using USB port. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 05:31:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DA416A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 05:31:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr (smtp9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC9D43D54 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 05:31:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0912.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id EE3441C005FD for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:31:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0912.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D66361C005EA for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:31:22 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050405053122878.D66361C005EA@mwinf0912.wanadoo.fr Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:31:22 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <136953345.20050405073122@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Digital Cameras X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 05:31:24 -0000 Sergei Gnezdov writes: > Is there a chance to get digital camers working with FreeBSD? All I > need is load images from camera using USB port. You might be better off removing the card and using a card reader. Card reader specs are much more generalized and consistent than digital camera specs. If the type of card/reader your camera uses is unsupported by FreeBSD, at least you have a better chance of getting support for it in the future than you would for a specific model of a specific camera. -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 06:32:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83E116A4D9 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 06:32:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx-relay.gwtc.net (mx-relay.gwtc.net [64.251.160.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A22443D31 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 06:32:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Justin@rapidcity.net) Received: from Shire (dsl1-208-34-11-13.sky.gwtc.net [208.34.11.13] (may be forged)) by mx-relay.gwtc.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with SMTP id j356WYXT090423 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:32:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from Justin@rapidcity.net) Message-ID: <005301c539a9$499efe60$152ea8c0@Shire> From: "Justin England" To: "FreeBSD Questions" Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:31:50 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: VPN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 06:32:40 -0000 Fellow FreeBSDers, I need somebody to point me in the right direction for VPN access to a = central site. I will need to have my home FreeBSD server connected to = the central site, and unfortunately, most other incoming VPN connections = to the central site will be mostly Win2K/XP. I am just looking for somebody to recommend to me the package(s) that = are needed on the server (and my FreeBSD client) that will allow = connections, and my main concern is that the Win2K/XP machines do not = require any special software installed. The server is 5.3-STABLE. I have looked through the ports collection and it seems that there are = many options, but I would prefer not to install each one for testing and = hope that somebody has had the same requirements and can tell me what = works for them. Thanks, Justin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 06:40:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C4B16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 06:40:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D61E43D48 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 06:40:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.222.227] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.43) id 1DIhjb-0002ra-9M; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:40:23 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Message-Id: From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:40:22 -0600 To: sergei@gnezdov.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.161.222.227 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on hobbiton.shire.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1+cvs (built Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:44:05 -0700) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on hobbiton.shire.net) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Digital Cameras X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 06:40:25 -0000 On Apr 4, 2005, at 10:28 PM, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > Is there a chance to get digital camers working with FreeBSD? All I > need is load images from camera using USB port. Most digital camera's today implement the USB mass storage system, so you should just try and plug the camera in. It may work! Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 06:51:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBDB16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 06:51:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gnezdov.net (63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net [63.224.222.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93AF43D2F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 06:51:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sergei@gnezdov.net) Received: from gnezdov.net (localhost.birds [127.0.0.1]) by gnezdov.net (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j356qF3A091074 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:52:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sergei@gnezdov.net) Received: (from sergei@localhost) by gnezdov.net (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id j356qFQD091073 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:52:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sergei) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:52:15 -0700 From: Sergei Gnezdov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050405065215.GA90985@gnezdov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: What's the best upgrade procedure to avoid build errors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 06:51:07 -0000 I've been using FreeBSD and ports for quite a while and I like the ports system. The only problem is that in about half of the time ports installation or upgrade does not go that well. When it works without errors it is perfect. First, how I am using the system. I started to use portupgrade only and I am running cvsup sometimes, although I prefer not to do it unless I need it. Normally, I run cvsup for all. Is it safe to run cvsup for category I am intrested in? For example, I want to update nvu HTML editor. My typical commands: portupgrade -PR port_name I prefer to use the following command (it is faster), but it seems to work the best, when everything is in perfect synchronized state: portupgrade -wWPR port_name Most of the time I run portupgrade -PR port_name Here are the typical problems. -- Inconsistency in the database, please, run: pkgdb -F I run it and then I have no clue what to say about stale dependencies. If I say no error does not go away. I have to say yes. I am not sure of what the consequences are. Sometimes things just don't get deleted. I will post a separate message about this problem. -- The option -R takes care of dependencies. Quite often dependencies fail to build. For example, the port was installed, but the dependency on /usr/local/bin/automake14 was not satisfied. I had the same problem with perl gettext port. Sometimes build process actually recommends to reinstall failed port. The good news are that after reinstallation missing files appear. Normally, the following command takes care of the dependency problem: portupgrade -f failed_depency_port I understand, that portupgrade makes our life easier, but the pain does not really go away. What do I do wrong? It seems to me that, when I try to install new application after cvsup I end up with inconsistencies. Am I supposed to upgrade absolutely everything, every time I run cvsup? portupgrade -rRa The line above would take a while. What should I do if it breaks in the middle of building Gnome or X. Will I end up without X environment, until the problem is fixed? Is it safe to update everything from X terminal in Gnome or KDE? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 06:54:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE17E16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 06:54:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gnezdov.net (63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net [63.224.222.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C75643D1F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 06:54:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sergei@gnezdov.net) Received: from gnezdov.net (localhost.birds [127.0.0.1]) by gnezdov.net (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j356tOr0091098 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:55:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sergei@gnezdov.net) Received: (from sergei@localhost) by gnezdov.net (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id j356tO4Z091097 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:55:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sergei) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:55:23 -0700 From: Sergei Gnezdov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050405065523.GB90985@gnezdov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Problem with 'pkgdb -F' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 06:54:15 -0000 Here is the interaction with pkgdb. If I start 'pkgdb -F' after running it once, the process will repeat itself. owl2-root % pkgdb -F ---> Checking the package registry database Stale origin: 'multimedia/nautilus-media': perhaps moved or obsoleted. -> The port 'multimedia/nautilus-media' was removed on 2005-03-12 because: "Deprecated, and no longer builds" -> Hint: nautilus-media-0.8.1 is required by the following package(s): gnome2-2.8.2 -> Hint: checking for overwritten files... -> No files installed by nautilus-media-0.8.1 have been overwritten by other packages. Deinstall nautilus-media-0.8.1 ? [no] yes ---> Deinstalling 'nautilus-media-0.8.1' pkg_delete: package 'nautilus-media-0.8.1' is required by these other packages and may not be deinstalled: gnome2-2.8.2 ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! nautilus-media-0.8.1 (pkg_delete failed) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed --> Failed. Stale origin: 'print/teTeX-latex2e': perhaps moved or obsoleted. -> The port 'print/teTeX-latex2e' was removed on 2005-02-06 because: "obsolete by new teTeX-texmf" -> Hint: teTeX-latex2e-1.0.20031201 is required by the following package(s): teTeX-2.0.2_7 -> Hint: checking for overwritten files... -> No files installed by teTeX-latex2e-1.0.20031201 have been overwritten by other packages. Deinstall teTeX-latex2e-1.0.20031201 ? [no] yes ---> Deinstalling 'teTeX-latex2e-1.0.20031201' pkg_delete: package 'teTeX-latex2e-1.0.20031201' is required by these other packages and may not be deinstalled: teTeX-2.0.2_7 ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! teTeX-latex2e-1.0.20031201 (pkg_delete failed) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed --> Failed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 07:03:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AF016A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:03:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA7443D49 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:03:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pergesu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1695979wri for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:03:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=o1wyfa/a53+yVsVi5qn/ri7KbG2wcr4O7baEEjG1xyKV3ciNmOKaDunY/DHJ89W42ADlWx+yIFbd5Vk6J5pNNRhIU6UuqUcGesJErvCyVV/19nHUHScQucy93HGw3ui35vYiiOcaRhs1Lpxqc7T/vtcl3GYjQtHlePaJXe8hW1c= Received: by 10.54.48.13 with SMTP id v13mr405283wrv; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:03:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.42.28 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:03:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <810a540e05040500035cc85051@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:03:03 -0700 From: Pat Maddox To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Permission denied in make installworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pat Maddox List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:03:04 -0000 I'm upgrading to 5.3-p7, and the buildworld, buildkernel, and installkernel all went fine. Now when I try installworld, I get this error: lalas# make installworld mkdir -p /tmp/install.Zzqwwvov for prog in [ awk cap_mkdb cat chflags chmod chown date echo egrep find grep ln make mkdir mtree mv pwd_mkdb rm sed sh sysctl test true uname wc zic; do cp `which $prog` /tmp/install.Zzqwwvov; done cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE=i386 CPUTYPE= GROFF_BIN_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/bin GROFF_FONT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/share/groff_font GROFF_TMAC_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/share/tmac PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/games:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/games:/tmp/install.Zzqwwvov make -f Makefile.inc1 reinstall make: Permission denied *** Error code 126 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. That error shows up on two different machines I use, using the same upgrade procedure. Any ideas on what to do? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 07:17:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D87516A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:17:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CB643D53 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:17:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pergesu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1698142wri for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:17:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=uvEt5ul7vFYP5+Ck0lP4R4F6bWTWZH2QT0TyPDdmHKnzVg9FrZU3QS0XGO1mGX/DCquDhDEa4vzQAdCcETckwUrQxnFbEfMVkCeDX0RxGe6O3Dq43cu0+Kk3jNbCn0S5NVgn7GOtOrBsgyywd4FIFw27r2hV/itbH1LsZVQPxBE= Received: by 10.54.25.74 with SMTP id 74mr829475wry; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.42.28 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <810a540e050405001711e3221a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:17:26 -0700 From: Pat Maddox To: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <810a540e05040500035cc85051@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <810a540e05040500035cc85051@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Permission denied in make installworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pat Maddox List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:17:27 -0000 Btw, I had already googled and saw that I needed to umount /tmp. I just kept getting Device Busy errors when I tried. After a while I was able to. Kinda freaked out, cause I've been told that if you don't do it quickly, then it really screws up your machine. Is that true? On Apr 5, 2005 12:03 AM, Pat Maddox wrote: > I'm upgrading to 5.3-p7, and the buildworld, buildkernel, and > installkernel all went fine. Now when I try installworld, I get this > error: > > lalas# make installworld > mkdir -p /tmp/install.Zzqwwvov > for prog in [ awk cap_mkdb cat chflags chmod chown date echo egrep > find grep ln make mkdir mtree mv pwd_mkdb rm sed sh sysctl test true > uname wc zic; do cp `which $prog` /tmp/install.Zzqwwvov; done > cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj MACHINE_ARCH=i386 > MACHINE=i386 CPUTYPE= > GROFF_BIN_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/bin > GROFF_FONT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/share/groff_font > GROFF_TMAC_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/share/tmac > PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/games:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/games:/tmp/install.Zzqwwvov > make -f Makefile.inc1 reinstall > make: Permission denied > *** Error code 126 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > That error shows up on two different machines I use, using the same > upgrade procedure. Any ideas on what to do? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 07:30:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BC416A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:30:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.infinitebubble.com (pia140-70.pioneernet.net [66.114.140.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E2B43D1D for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:30:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@infinitebubble.com) Received: from localhost (thor.infinitebubble.com [10.10.1.1]) by mail.infinitebubble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBDE3577D; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.infinitebubble.com ([10.10.1.3]) by localhost (thor.infinitebubble.com [10.10.1.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29558-01; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:29:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.253] (unknown [192.168.1.253]) by mail.infinitebubble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8154033CD7; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42523F13.1020902@infinitebubble.com> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:32:35 -0700 From: Jason Taylor User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Kevin G. Eliuk" References: <42505AB3.6090602@infinitebubble.com> <42506B78.6050309@dccnet.com> <4250EA45.6060803@infinitebubble.com> <4251FBC8.8040203@dccnet.com> In-Reply-To: <4251FBC8.8040203@dccnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at infinitebubble.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Formating a 1680k floppy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:30:10 -0000 Kevin G. Eliuk wrote: > Jason Taylor wrote: >> I'm sure. I get the same results trying to create a 1720k. >> >> %fdformat -f 1680 /dev/fd0 >> fdformat: unknown format 1680 KB for drive type 1.44M >> %fdformat -f 1720 /dev/fd0 >> fdformat: unknown format 1720 KB for drive type 1.44M >> %fdformat -s 21,,,,80 /dev/fd0 >> Format 1680K floppy `/dev/fd0'? (y/n): y >> Processing E^C-------------------------------------- >> %fdformat -s 21,,,,82 /dev/fd0 >> Format 1722K floppy `/dev/fd0'? (y/n): y >> Processing E^C-------------------------------------- > > > My mistake. ( I haven't looked at this procedure in a loooong while). > I have just successful in creating a 1722 by: > > # fdcontrol -f 1722 /dev/fd0 > # fdformat fd0 > Format 1722K floppy `/dev/fd0'? (y/n): y > Processing VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV done. > > Not sure about a 1680: > > # fdcontrol -v -f 1680 /dev/fd0 > fdcontrol: unknown format 1680 KB for drive type 1.44M > > Hope this helps a bit. > Yes, it helped a lot! Thank you. It set me down the right path at least. Here's what I came up with that finally worked: %fdcontrol -s 21,512,0xFF,0X1C,80,500,2,0x0C,2,0,+mfm /dev/fd0 %fdformat fd0 Format 1680K floppy `/dev/fd0'? (y/n): y Processing VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV done. FWIW, I think the following patch for fdcio.h would let the "fdformt -f 1680 /dev/fd0" method work. I have *not* tested this. --- fdcio.h Fri Sep 17 21:57:55 2004 +++ fdcio.h.1680 Tue Apr 5 00:19:09 2005 @@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ */ #define FDF_3_2880 36,2,0xFF,0x1B,80,0,FDC_1MBPS,002,0x4C,1,1,FL_MFM|FL_PERPND #define FDF_3_1722 21,2,0xFF,0x04,82,0,FDC_500KBPS,2,0x0C,2,0,FL_MFM +#define FDF_3_1680 21,2,0xFF,0x1C,80,0,FDC_500KBPS,2,0x0C,2,0,FL_MFM #define FDF_3_1476 18,2,0xFF,0x1B,82,0,FDC_500KBPS,2,0x6C,1,0,FL_MFM #define FDF_3_1440 18,2,0xFF,0x1B,80,0,FDC_500KBPS,2,0x6C,1,0,FL_MFM #define FDF_3_1200 15,2,0xFF,0x1B,80,0,FDC_500KBPS,2,0x54,1,0,FL_MFM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 07:42:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF4A16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:42:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr (postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC83F43D54 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:42:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vincent@vincent_bachelier.hd.free.fr) Received: from vincent_bachelier.hd.free.fr (ferreol-1-82-66-171-150.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.171.150]) by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BE831776D; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:42:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by vincent_bachelier.hd.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EEAFCC9403; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:42:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:42:03 +0200 From: Bachelier Vincent To: Spiral Eyed Girl Message-ID: <20050405074203.GC10950@localhost> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD localhost 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More BSD/KDE Sound Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:42:09 -0000 use the oss drivers sound is real good, and you can use it personaly for free Le Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 03:50:54PM -0800, Spiral Eyed Girl a écrit: > From: "Spiral Eyed Girl" > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 15:50:54 -0800 > Subject: More BSD/KDE Sound Problems > > I got sound working correctly with my SoundBlaster Audigy MP3+, but I have > a problem with sound quality. It sounds hollow, like you are listening to > really loud headphones a few feet away from you. > > Has anyone experienced this problem (with or without an audigy card), and > do you have any solutions? I know SBA support for freebsd is new, but I > need to know if I setup something wrong, or if it's just because support is > new and incomplete. > > Thanks > > S. > > -- Vincent Bachelier Language : Francais / English Societ(e/y) : Solintech - http://www.solintech.fr - Serveurs linux Citation (fortune): Millihelen, adj: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 07:42:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08D516A4D9 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:42:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA65243D41 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:42:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from pooh.nagual.st (pooh.nagual.st [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.st with esmtp; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:42:11 +0200 Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:42:12 +0200 From: dick hoogendijk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050405094212.42b93112.dick@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20050404093755.GA48928@epia2.farid-hajji.net> References: <20050404091719.GA9748@lothlorien.nagual.st> <20050404093755.GA48928@epia2.farid-hajji.net> Organization: nagual SiTe X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: HZ=1000 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dick@nagual.st List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:42:13 -0000 On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:37:55 +0200 cpghost@cordula.ws wrote: > Interestingly, HZ=100 has remained constant for decades (!), despite > CPUs getting faster all the time. This is an excellent value for most > typical usage patterns. Cranking it up should only be required for > special cases. Anyway, the HZ knob is there. Experiment with it until > you get optimal performance. Thanks for the explanation. Your last remark puzzles me though. 'experiment with it until you get optimal performance' Yeah sure. I like to experiment. I don't want the fuzzy "it /feels/ like its slower/faster" stuff. Way too subjective. Can someone advise me on some test software to expermient with? I.e.: I set hz=100 / hz=1000 / hz=2000 ; with or without polling and I run a testing program that measures the diffs. Does something like this exists? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 07:46:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071B316A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:46:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr (postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FDD43D31 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:46:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vincent@vincent_bachelier.hd.free.fr) Received: from vincent_bachelier.hd.free.fr (ferreol-1-82-66-171-150.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.171.150]) by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A493177CA; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:46:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by vincent_bachelier.hd.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BFE26C9403; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:46:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:46:14 +0200 From: Bachelier Vincent To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" Message-ID: <20050405074614.GD10950@localhost> References: <20050404073532.GA13922@localhost> <20050404065400.5df59456@dolphin.local.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20050404065400.5df59456@dolphin.local.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD localhost 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 optimization on FreeBSD 5.4 i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:46:19 -0000 Ok, I have found the solution CFLAGS += -march=k8 and use pkgtools.conf for certain application that doesn't support it. gcc32 gcc33 fr-openoffice ... doesn't the nvidia driver works on amd64 version of freebsd ? ok see ya Le Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 06:54:00AM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier a écrit: > From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > To: Bachelier Vincent > Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:54:00 -0500 > Subject: Re: AMD64 optimization on FreeBSD 5.4 i386 > > On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:35:32 +0200, Bachelier Vincent > wrote: > > > Hi, I have a AMD64 and use FreeBSD 5.4 i386. > > Why aren't you using the amd64 version of FreeBSD? > > > I have set CPUTYPE=k8 to optimize a little for my computer. > > I have seen they set march=athlon-mp when it compile something. > > I you were running amd64, you could use CPUTYPE=athlon64. > > > Ok, I have see they is a difference between march=k8 and > > march=athlon-mp > > > > Have a idea ? > > Yes, download the ISO for amd64 and install it. :-) > > > Does I compile with march=k8 under cflags ? > > for example: CFLAGS=-O2 -march=k8 -pipe > > CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS > > I think the CXXFLAGS setting is unnecessary, as this will happen by > default. > > > Well, what do you think ? > > I think you should be running amd64. :-) > > > could I optimize more than CPUTYPE=k8 ? > > Yes. See above. :-) > > Seriously, though, the amd64 version of FreeBSD is quite stable and > usable, and would allow you to take full advantage of your machine's > 64-bit architecture. Why settle for less? > > -- > Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas" -- Vincent Bachelier Language : Francais / English Societ(e/y) : Solintech - http://www.solintech.fr - Serveurs linux Citation (fortune): The trouble with being punctual is that people think you have nothing more important to do. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 07:48:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27EA16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:48:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from trumpet.nightmaestro.com (186.10.233.220.exetel.com.au [220.233.10.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD6C43D2F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:48:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-ml@nightmaestro.com) Received: from violin (greyeye-xp [10.1.1.4])j357mbqK010238; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:48:38 +1000 Message-Id: <200504050748.j357mbqK010238@trumpet.nightmaestro.com> From: "James Hong" To: "'Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC'" , Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:48:33 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcU5qmkSnfyBjPypTfCyw4tr4Y7fVQACWjyg X-nightmaestro.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-nightmaestro.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-104.896, required 10, autolearn=not spam, AWL 0.00, BAYES_00 -4.90, USER_IN_WHITELIST -100.00) X-MailScanner-From: freebsd-ml@nightmaestro.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Digital Cameras X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:48:48 -0000 try gphoto2 I remember extracting images from canon 10d using this. James H -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 4:40 PM To: sergei@gnezdov.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Digital Cameras On Apr 4, 2005, at 10:28 PM, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > Is there a chance to get digital camers working with FreeBSD? All I > need is load images from camera using USB port. Most digital camera's today implement the USB mass storage system, so you should just try and plug the camera in. It may work! Chad _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 07:53:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E5916A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:53:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE7043D31 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:53:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1402565rng for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:53:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=F0VEZnLeZGApKjH3K2fQYFFlOcHBje3MNdvuwEwQsStF1kHTiZyfCcOEbvWUsE5a0FPNdn51/+savISzX7zk7xaVIbVBkbek/wvSqocCy0cQ9jH1MTrUF06BYGatv+dBsvMU3VvqnJRR1tnXxTtnPGM5i2kO9Z9km5AKPX55FB0= Received: by 10.38.86.68 with SMTP id j68mr6159331rnb; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:53:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:53:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:53:36 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: printing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:53:37 -0000 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/printing.html I just went trough this and the words that came to my mind when i finaly reach the end was "O MY GOD" Its a very nice manual but it gives you this "Do i really need a printer ?" feeling. This part i liked alot about the usb :) http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/printing-intro-setup.html#PRINTING-HARDWARE "USB interfaces, named for the Universal Serial Bus, can run at even faster speeds than parallel or RS232 serial interfaces. Cables are simple and cheap. USB is superior to RS232 Serial and to Parallel for printing, but it is not as well supported under UNIX(r) systems. A way to avoid this problem is to purchase a printer that has both a USB interface and a Parallel interface, as many printers do." lol, a very nice translation that says usb = no printing :) So my question is, for printing sake let there be a other way. What do you use to print stuff, for example on a shared windows printer :) I guess there are only 3 choses LPD LPRng CUPS ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 08:58:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B1516A4D6; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:58:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B6143D1F; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:58:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1DIjtg-0009F9-6J; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:58:56 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Justin Bennett In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:30:38 -0700 . Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:58:56 +0300 From: Danny Braniss Message-ID: cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iSCSI (revisited?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 08:58:58 -0000 > All, > > I was wondering what people thought of iSCSI and FreeBSD. Is it a viable > option for creating SANs? > refrase question. > I want to move away from tape backups, and have numerous production > FreeBSD machines that I need to back up data from. > for one, it depends on how deep are your pockets, 2nd the size of your data. 3rd how fast do you need to access the data, 4th from where, etc, etc, etc. > Any other ideas for a disk to disk backup solution that people have used? > We went the NAS/NFS route for most of our uses, and ONE application that has a huge database has a fiber channel link to the filer. The NAS is Raid4, with hot standbys, and we have not had a serious meltdown in years. Before NAS, we had to upgrade our servers, dump|restore, and the down times were getting larger, with the NAS, just add some disks, and no one is the wiser, life goes on. We still do tape backups, and move the tapes out of our premises just in case a major disaster hist us (someone misspoint a ICBM perhaps :-) having said all this, we are experimenting with iSCSI, and the numbers are not bad, about the same as NFS/NAS. Still, NFS is still our prefered solution. danny PS: AFAIK, there is only a iSCSI intitiator (beta), and no target for FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 09:09:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD3A16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:09:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0345943D41 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:09:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Apr 2005 09:09:04 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de) [62.245.232.135] by mail.gmx.net (mp023) with SMTP; 05 Apr 2005 11:09:04 +0200 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:08:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050404091719.GA9748@lothlorien.nagual.st> <20050404093755.GA48928@epia2.farid-hajji.net> <4251C915.1000009@cloudview.com> In-Reply-To: <4251C915.1000009@cloudview.com> X-Birthday: 10/06/72 X-CelPhone: +49 173 9967781 X-Tel: +49 89 18947781 X-Country: Germany X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-OS: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1449514.Fqht2bjg9s"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504051109.01670@harrymail> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: John Pettitt cc: cpghost@cordula.ws Subject: Re: HZ=1000 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:09:07 -0000 --nextPart1449514.Fqht2bjg9s Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Dienstag, 5. April 2005 01:09 schrieb John Pettitt: > cpghost@cordula.ws wrote: > >Interestingly, HZ=3D100 has remained constant for decades (!), despite > >CPUs getting faster all the time. This is an excellent value for most > >typical usage patterns. Cranking it up should only be required for > >special cases. Anyway, the HZ knob is there. Experiment with it until > >you get optimal performance. > > In the dim and distant past (like 1983) some systems used HZ=3D50 or HZ= =3D60 > depending on where in the world they were. I used an MP/M based box > that took it's clock tick from the power line (no good RTC hardware Hmm, I've seen onboard RTCs which surely were less acurate than a=20 power-line-driven oscillator was ;) Some RTCs are really bad. But at least= =20 here in germany power line frequency is astonishing acurate. We also have a= =20 broadcast station which generates it's 50Hz vertical refresh rate from a=20 dedicated caesium clock. Of course this tv station is paid by the peoples..= =2E. Sorry, a bit OT, but I'm really impressed how constant power line frequency= =20 is. =2DHarry > available but the power company keeps pretty good time). > > John > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --nextPart1449514.Fqht2bjg9s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCUlWtBylq0S4AzzwRAinhAKCNCE+ruXGU6hYWrDvYBg71ngVPRwCdFCn0 7Xm5jfUxZiUhwRPKMY61qzw= =Yi52 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1449514.Fqht2bjg9s-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 09:15:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233BB16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:15:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C6EE43D31 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:15:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Apr 2005 09:15:38 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de) [62.245.232.135] by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 05 Apr 2005 11:15:38 +0200 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, emartinez@crockettint.com Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:15:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050404212954.81A6036D95@mxc1.crockettint.com> In-Reply-To: <20050404212954.81A6036D95@mxc1.crockettint.com> X-Birthday: 10/06/72 X-CelPhone: +49 173 9967781 X-Tel: +49 89 18947781 X-Country: Germany X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-OS: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2031485.mgRQ8W7gXT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504051115.25902@harrymail> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: Promise TX2 Rebuild via atacontrol?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:15:41 -0000 --nextPart2031485.mgRQ8W7gXT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Montag, 4. April 2005 23:29 schrieb Edgar Martinez: > All, > > > > I have a failed member in a RAID1 array and using atacontrol can see that > the status is degraded. I am curious if I can use atacontrol to rebuild t= he > array if the original array was built using the Promise BIOS utility. If I > tell atacontrol to rebuild.will it corrupt my data or catch fire and > explode?? You don't tell us what version you use, but promise is supported very well,= =20 even in atamkII in 6-current. If you replace the failed drive it sould be automatically rebuilt, the=20 `atacontrol rebuild ar0` doesn't work as long as you (in 5.x) used "addspar= e"=20 or the controller found a good "spare" drive. In 4.x you don't have the addspare option, you have to `atacontrol detach 3= `=20 and reattach it the same way to get recognized and inserted as spare in an= =20 existing array. =2DHarry > > > > Cheers! > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --nextPart2031485.mgRQ8W7gXT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCUlctBylq0S4AzzwRAsO+AJwOiM35glkSXAI9DReGtTqvRUKZ6wCffIlO XC+tkeG00UpTdIJlmIbbRdc= =dqN5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2031485.mgRQ8W7gXT-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 09:17:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EA216A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:17:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688E543D46 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:17:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j359Hnb05004; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:17:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Justin England" , "FreeBSD Questions" Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:17:33 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <005301c539a9$499efe60$152ea8c0@Shire> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: VPN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:17:38 -0000 the quickest and easiest way is poptop from the ports, then the out-of-box windows pptp client that is included in the windows os. Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Justin England > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 11:32 PM > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: VPN > > > Fellow FreeBSDers, > > I need somebody to point me in the right direction for VPN > access to a central site. I will need to have my home FreeBSD > server connected to the central site, and unfortunately, most > other incoming VPN connections to the central site will be > mostly Win2K/XP. > > I am just looking for somebody to recommend to me the > package(s) that are needed on the server (and my FreeBSD > client) that will allow connections, and my main concern is > that the Win2K/XP machines do not require any special software > installed. The server is 5.3-STABLE. > > I have looked through the ports collection and it seems that > there are many options, but I would prefer not to install each > one for testing and hope that somebody has had the same > requirements and can tell me what works for them. > > Thanks, > > Justin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 09:27:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A5216A4CF for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:27:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moon.htlwrn.ac.at (moon.htlwrn.ac.at [193.170.149.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF54343D46 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:27:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from c.sudec@htlwrn.ac.at) Received: from [10.2.9.59] (fireo.htlwrn.ac.at [193.170.149.156]) by moon.htlwrn.ac.at (8.12.8-Sun/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j359pctu005848 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:51:38 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <42525A1B.7060806@htlwrn.ac.at> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:27:55 +0200 From: "Ing. Christian Sudec" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: de-at, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: apcupsd with usb X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:27:48 -0000 Hi there, a few months back there was already a question in this list regarding usb support in apcupsd since afaik only usb with linux is still supported. But there was a beta version named apcupsd-3.10.16-test2 which delivered the functions I need. Sad but true the link was broken. Has anyone a working (beta) version of this freebsd-apcupsd with usb-support? When will be usb officialy supported? (And no, I can not workaround with serial, since the 1U-server doesn't have any) Thanks in advance Chris P.S.: Sorry for any inconveniences caused, if this is not the correct list. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 09:56:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6BF16A4D2 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:56:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8698B43D3F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:56:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DIkka-0004G3-GD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:53:36 +0200 Received: from 41.83.142.82.ip.b26.cz ([82.142.83.41]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:53:36 +0200 Received: from novak by 41.83.142.82.ip.b26.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:53:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jiri Novak Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:55:27 +0200 Organization: NOSTROMO ICT s.r.o. Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <424D3033.6050409@dial.pipex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 41.83.142.82.ip.b26.cz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: [solved] Re: segfaulting gcc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:56:45 -0000 Jiri Novak wrote: > The error always occur at the same place, in ports (it was firefox and > mplayer > for sure, not quite sure about others) and in buildworld, so I don't > suspect faulty hardware. > No useful messages in /var/log/messages... > Well, it seems that I'm doomed :( > -- > Jiri Novak I hate to followup to myself, but I solved the problem... in a way :) I did download base distribution of 5.4-BETA1 and replaced my b0rken /usr/libexec/cc* binaries with "clean" ones. After that I'd rebuilt world and kernel with more sane optimization settings (I was using -O2, which probably caused the problem) and everything works happily, ports are building with no segfaults. If anybody have the same problem and is as desperate as I was (the system is physically almost unacessible for me), this may be the quick and dirty solution... -- Jiri Novak From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 09:59:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E207716A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:59:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D25B43D4C for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:59:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (net4801-2 [192.168.254.1]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349674B398; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:59:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:59:55 +0200 From: cpghost@cordula.ws To: dick hoogendijk Message-ID: <20050405095955.GA72608@fw.farid-hajji.net> References: <20050404091719.GA9748@lothlorien.nagual.st> <20050404093755.GA48928@epia2.farid-hajji.net> <20050405094212.42b93112.dick@nagual.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050405094212.42b93112.dick@nagual.st> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HZ=1000 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:59:33 -0000 On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:42:12AM +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote: > On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:37:55 +0200 > cpghost@cordula.ws wrote: > > > Interestingly, HZ=100 has remained constant for decades (!), despite > > CPUs getting faster all the time. This is an excellent value for most > > typical usage patterns. Cranking it up should only be required for > > special cases. Anyway, the HZ knob is there. Experiment with it until > > you get optimal performance. > > Thanks for the explanation. Your last remark puzzles me though. > 'experiment with it until you get optimal performance' Yeah sure. I like > to experiment. I don't want the fuzzy "it /feels/ like its > slower/faster" stuff. Way too subjective. Can someone advise me on some > test software to expermient with? I.e.: I set hz=100 / hz=1000 / hz=2000 > ; with or without polling and I run a testing program that measures the > diffs. Does something like this exists? I don't know if there's a single test suite for this. It all depends on what you want to do with your system. If you have compute intensive tasks (that does not only include numerical computations; stuff like application servers requires a lot of CPU cycles as well!), you would prefer longer time slices, a.k.a. lower HZ values. If your typical mix of applications is more I/O bound and requires more polling and real-time responsiveness, shorter time slices may be better. But, if you have *many* processes, a lower HZ would be better again, because of the thread switching overhead... What you could do (besides that fuzzy feeling) is to measure the wall clock (!) time of processes, their latency (time between request and reply) and so on. I don't think there is a simple formula for "the overall speed/responsiveness" of such a complex system that could be used by a measurement suite. There are just too many aspects involved. You could always measure the performance of your "main" application (say, e.g. a database server) and don't care too much about infrequently used processes. > dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE > ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3 > + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 10:03:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB75D16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:03:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9E843D49 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:03:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DIkrQ-0005M9-Ux for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:00:40 +0200 Received: from 41.83.142.82.ip.b26.cz ([82.142.83.41]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:00:40 +0200 Received: from novak by 41.83.142.82.ip.b26.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:00:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jiri Novak Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:55:09 +0200 Organization: NOSTROMO ICT s.r.o. Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <424D3033.6050409@dial.pipex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 41.83.142.82.ip.b26.cz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: [solved] Re: segfaulting gcc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:03:33 -0000 Jiri Novak wrote: > The error always occur at the same place, in ports (it was firefox and > mplayer > for sure, not quite sure about others) and in buildworld, so I don't > suspect faulty hardware. > No useful messages in /var/log/messages... > Well, it seems that I'm doomed :( > -- > Jiri Novak I hate to followup to myself, but I solved the problem... in a way :) I did download base distribution of 5.4-BETA1 and replaced my b0rken /usr/libexec/cc* binaries with "clean" ones. After that I'd rebuilt world and kernel with more sane optimization settings (I was using -O2, which probably caused the problem) and everything works happily, ports are building with no segfaults. If anybody have the same problem and is as desperate as I was (the system is physically almost unacessible for me), this may be the quick and dirty solution... -- Jiri Novak From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 10:13:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5C516A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:13:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC5543D46 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:13:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DIl16-0006d1-1A for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:10:40 +0200 Received: from 41.83.142.82.ip.b26.cz ([82.142.83.41]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:10:40 +0200 Received: from novak by 41.83.142.82.ip.b26.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:10:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jiri Novak Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:56:39 +0200 Organization: NOSTROMO ICT s.r.o. Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <424D3033.6050409@dial.pipex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 41.83.142.82.ip.b26.cz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: [solved] Re: segfaulting gcc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:13:14 -0000 Jiri Novak wrote: > The error always occur at the same place, in ports (it was firefox and > mplayer > for sure, not quite sure about others) and in buildworld, so I don't > suspect faulty hardware. > No useful messages in /var/log/messages... > Well, it seems that I'm doomed :( > -- > Jiri Novak I hate to followup to myself, but I solved the problem... in a way :) I did download base distribution of 5.4-BETA1 and replaced my b0rken /usr/libexec/cc* binaries with "clean" ones. After that I'd rebuilt world and kernel with more sane optimization settings (I was using -O2, which probably caused the problem) and everything works happily, ports are building with no segfaults. If anybody have the same problem and is as desperate as I was (the system is physically almost unacessible for me), this may be the quick and dirty solution... -- Jiri Novak From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 10:13:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA5A16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:13:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F4843D41 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:13:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gjbailey@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so321234wra for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 03:13:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WUWsdT7x1pGuyIHmQSr9RY7p5SypelTj4xAxs6zJ5ddGbAKj69AtvrPH04UBcG9neN1AgacFybBp05+KKHOgTNqB3zqtYBpa/ZrZq5oGrQqO0NVHRp5CNim1y7fUyk2B2cWcDTjUCus9pUGW84MMMTvSGL7Bev96cz+nnCg8erA= Received: by 10.54.32.67 with SMTP id f67mr697961wrf; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 03:13:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.83.20 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 03:13:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48a5f32a050405031350803bb2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:13:24 +0200 From: Gareth Bailey To: freebsd-questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Copying files off Samba Server - freezes/very slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gareth Bailey List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:13:25 -0000 I have just upgraded the hardware of our development server. I thought that our file server used to be slow due to slow hardware, but now that we have upgraded I am a bit puzzled. Samba seems to slow or hang (top reports smbd CPU usage as 40%) when files are copied off the server using windows explorer on the client. Can anyone sugeest a reason for this behaviour? Thanks, Gareth From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 10:26:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A08616A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:26:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4A743D45 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:26:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sadashiv.linux@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1424986rng for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 03:26:06 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=p0w+sNVyGGRpbSrIpHdgwe0yTnHZMgTUaHq3XFDp/xEziNKayTJDs/BoDby2M3tBZ1JDSvoww5jCJ9sgjb1qy9QzVC9tw63vXLVT1US8982Oyfawa7uiTA7Nh7i8pNtjaZHcQbqZaMMXwplpC+/+69S5ssFTIxBHTfJVfT/xT3A= Received: by 10.38.72.79 with SMTP id u79mr6222447rna; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 03:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.9.39 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 03:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:56:06 +0530 From: Sadashiv Kulthe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, support@ipowerweb.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: sysctl / webalizer package installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sadashiv Kulthe List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:26:07 -0000 Hello, I am trying to install webalizer package. While trying to make, I get following errors > thanks a lot for info .. > Previously there was no ports directory under /usr > So I downloded all 12,### ports from net and extract them under /usr > now when I > cd /usr/ports/graphics/gd > or > cd /usr/ports/graphics/png > > and give command make it gives following error > > -bash-2.05b# pwd > /usr/ports/graphics/png > -bash-2.05b# make > /usr/sbin/sysctl: not found > "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1030: warning: "/usr/sbin/sysctl -n > kern.osreldate" returned non-zero status I have virtual server from ipowerweb. I found no sysctl on it. How to install/start sysctl on it? account : vyomlabs.com ( 66.235.208.86 ) Regards Sadashiv Kulthe System Administrator, OSL, Vyom Labs Pvt Ltd - Pune, MH India sadashiv.linux@gmail.com mob: 919890470334 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 10:57:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA07616A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:57:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD40A43D49 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:57:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from frambozen (frambozen [192.168.1.9]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA78810; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 06:57:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 06:58:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Hill To: sergei@gnezdov.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050405065053.C59447@frambozen.monochrome.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Digital Cameras X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:57:07 -0000 On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > Is there a chance to get digital camers working with FreeBSD? All I > need is load images from camera using USB port. It may depend on the specific camera. Some people have reported problems trying to do this, but I've had no trouble doing exactly what you describe. You don't need any special software, just standard stuff (cp, mv, rm). I have a Sony DSC-P10, and it also works fine using a friend's Sony DSC-(some other number). HTH. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 11:14:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0619A16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:14:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from electrictoolbox.com (electrictoolbox.com [210.55.105.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5910A43D1F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:14:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from orders@linuxcdmall.com) Received: from services.electrictoolbox.com (electrictoolbox.com [210.55.105.60]) by electrictoolbox.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j35BE1cf015810 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:14:02 +1200 (NZST) (envelope-from orders@linuxcdmall.com) From: Chris Hope - Linux CD Mall To: questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:14:12 +1200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504052314.12460.orders@linuxcdmall.com> Subject: listing on obtaining freebsd page X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:14:17 -0000 Good evening, I am enquiring about getting a listing on the obtaining freebsd page of the online doucmentation at the following address: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors.html Could you please reply to me with the email address of the appropriate person to discuss this with. Many thanks, Chris -- Chris Hope Linux CD Mall - a division of The Electric Toolbox Ltd Email: orders@linuxcdmall.com Web: www.linuxcdmall.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 11:17:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E020F16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:17:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC9A43D1D for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:17:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nlamprecht@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so331824wra for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 04:17:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bMawlZk2cCQLueEvFKwpSGukVGDSqLfg9RsNWj/kjiXCKTkar8NsyOWafTrzgqbloCQqMy02CwTNP4+vZ2Te9JWgUEXbPdk7JwlvOgsnhUmmuM6pfNLMqK7aOYm9HBTQpbNmgMirjvdCp4OqwOTYYrTdtq6w7WA23Vc78ZVOeJs= Received: by 10.54.84.18 with SMTP id h18mr656777wrb; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 04:17:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.38.48 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:17:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7cbadc8705040504171cf0bd8f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:17:30 +0200 From: Nelis Lamprecht To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: portupgrade weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nelis Lamprecht List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:17:34 -0000 Hi, I seem to be having some difficulty upgrading some of my packages using portupgrade. Here is an example: medusa# portversion -vl "<" | grep m4 m4-1.4.1 < needs updating (port has 1.4.3) medusa# portupgrade m4 medusa# Basically it's doing nothing as if it thinks the port is already updated ? This happens with my php4 port as well as the quagga port and one or two others. Some update fine, some don't. If I do a portupgrade -f it installs the same version currently installed and still doesn't install the new port. Any ideas ? Thanks. Nelis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 11:30:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595B016A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:30:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F003243D39 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:30:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nlamprecht@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so333704wra for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 04:30:01 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=nfgIrViCRcGgaa9P1OuOJ/mOF9Mudiy9P18Q7b4Gyi344wQdeZYE5ErpTn7aHelPODZdRcXBF3FiW46ir55ardTSzRKk9xO8dl+/767Odwd0GKibmy82gEOyXrl7AISwTWdZp2PIgaVgdt4/ZQr0slEsjLx18ucAEeaBX3cOveU= Received: by 10.54.7.36 with SMTP id 36mr736497wrg; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 04:30:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.38.48 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:30:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7cbadc87050405043042528cef@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:30:01 +0200 From: Nelis Lamprecht To: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <7cbadc8705040504171cf0bd8f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7cbadc8705040504171cf0bd8f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: portupgrade weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nelis Lamprecht List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:30:02 -0000 Replying to my own message. For the archives, the problem below was caused because my local cvsup mirror was not in sync with the INDEX file I downloaded from the main FreeBSD site. Sorry, should have checked a specific port version Makefile before posting the question. Nelis On Apr 5, 2005 1:17 PM, Nelis Lamprecht wrote: > Hi, > > I seem to be having some difficulty upgrading some of my packages > using portupgrade. Here is an example: > > medusa# portversion -vl "<" | grep m4 > m4-1.4.1 < needs updating (port has 1.4.3) > > medusa# portupgrade m4 > medusa# > > Basically it's doing nothing as if it thinks the port is already > updated ? This happens with my php4 port as well as the quagga port > and one or two others. Some update fine, some don't. If I do a > portupgrade -f it installs the same version currently installed and > still doesn't install the new port. > > Any ideas ? > > Thanks. > > Nelis > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 11:38:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B05C16A518 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:38:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.uu.se [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE1643D2D for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:38:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 36CC0495F; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:38:35 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s206860; Tue, 5 Apr 05 13:38:28 +0200 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6CF48B6 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:38:28 +0200 (MSZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id A1FDF38016; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:38:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD425C002 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:38:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:38:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Davour To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1183736361.20050405031743@wanadoo.fr> Message-ID: References: <1183736361.20050405031743@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: Securely allowing just one application via telnet X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:38:38 -0000 On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > If I want to allow external users to log on under only one permissible > username, which immediately and unconditionally executes only one > program (no shell access), via telnet, what is the most secure way to > set this up? I've always understood telnet to be somewhat of a > Pandora's box for security, but I don't know if that applies to the > protocol itself, or to telnetd, or if it just refers to the many dangers > of shell access, or what. If there is a way to secure this type of > access, I'd like to try it on my test server (I won't risk the > production server, of course), as an exercise in setting up custom > environments. > > Any suggestions on how best to do this securely? > > If a specific user is restricted to a specific program at login (via > /etc/passwd), is there _any_ way he can sneak out to a shell, assuming > that the program he is forced to run does _not_ provide shellout access? Sure there is. If there is any possibility of a buffer overflow error in that one program you let your users run, or "login" for that matter. But, running the program as a login shell could at least minimize the possibilities I guess. Not that I've tried it myself. Go read about chroot and jail in the manpages and you'll think of something. /andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 11:59:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A83416A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:59:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from trueband.net (director.trueband.net [216.163.120.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED81D43D1D for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:59:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 22837 invoked by uid 1006); 5 Apr 2005 11:59:54 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:SA:0(0.4/100.0):. Processed in 0.822251 secs); 05 Apr 2005 11:59:54 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 5 Apr 2005 11:59:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 22804 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2005 11:59:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vandaliamo.net) (jhall@12.170.206.13) by -v with SMTP; 5 Apr 2005 11:59:52 -0000 Message-ID: <42527EEB.70409@vandaliamo.net> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:04:59 -0500 From: Jay Hall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040429 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: mpd as a dial-up server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:59:55 -0000 I am in the process of adding dial-up capabilities to the FreeBSD servers I maintain so in the event of a problem, if the server starts, I can at least dial in and see what is wrong and hopefully correct the problem. I already have mpd in place for the VPN connections. Is it possible to use mpd with cu or tip as a dial-in solution? At this point in time, I have been able to connect to the FreeBSD server, but only see garbage on the screen. My guess is that I have conflicting modem settings on each end, but I wanted to make sure what I was doing would work before continuing. Thanks for your help. Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 08:22:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE2A16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:22:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kwik.eatserver.nl (kwik.eatserver.nl [212.203.14.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF99643D3F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:22:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from timmerije@talkinghome.nl) Received: from f9 (h6210016120.dsl.speedlinq.nl [62.100.16.120]) (authenticated bits=0)j358MMlX003638 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:22:22 +0200 From: "Niels Timmerije" To: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:21:01 +0200 Message-ID: <000001c539b8$67335430$1e00000a@f9> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:09:14 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Virtual Sound card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 08:22:24 -0000 Dear Sirs =20 I=92ve already sent you an email, but I wrote it in dutch. (I got this adress from a Dutch site) But now my question in English. I=92ve read something about a virtual soundcard at your site but it=92s = not clear to me if you deliver them. If you do, I would like some more information about this product. =20 Thank you. =20 Best Regards, Niels Timmerije --=20 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 1-4-2005 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 12:10:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405B216A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:10:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A0043D76 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:10:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from i.am.a.hedgehog@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so1438170rnf for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 05:10:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=rMEgeE2hSw9T3hHBGMTm5VuXERIseDH5+szoeiINhvhh8CjsfKhj8NrjllDXWEcmTy/gae+36W+cPqakswqSEhsN1Wos2r8jnUge38x87HShc7jT33BJIRXmu8XYWmOibt913vV89G/wJrjfgL+fynSlki0X8lrxUH3kccHCfmo= Received: by 10.39.2.79 with SMTP id e79mr6190834rni; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 05:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?80.42.244.26? ([80.42.244.26]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 71sm248303rnb.2005.04.05.05.10.45; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 05:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42528039.1010708@tiscali.co.uk> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:10:33 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: bertybadboy Subject: .iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:10:49 -0000 Which .iso files do i download and burn onto a cd? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 12:23:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C32416A4CF for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:23:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from park.rambler.ru (park.rambler.ru [81.19.64.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B9343D41 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:23:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kappa@rambler-co.ru) Received: from capella.park.rambler.ru (capella.park.rambler.ru [81.19.65.30]) by park.rambler.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j35CNF9T062975 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:23:15 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from kappa@rambler-co.ru) Received: by capella.park.rambler.ru (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CD37440FA; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:23:17 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:23:17 +0400 From: Alex Kapranoff To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050405122317.GA22484@capella.park.rambler.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE i386 Organization: Inner Mongolia User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-DCC-RAMBLER-Metrics: park.rambler.ru 32700; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Subject: Is sshd limiting the rate of successful connections? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:23:19 -0000 Good day! It seems that a recent 5-STABLE limits the rate of successful incoming logins. Is it true? We failed to find the relevant code neither in openssh nor in openpam. The symptoms are that after a big number of quick successful logins sshd starts to delay or block login attempts for as long as 10 seconds. Does someone know anyhting about such behaviour or is this some obscure configuration problem (read: pilot error)? -- Alex Kapranoff, $n=["1another7Perl213Just3hacker49"=~/\d|\D*/g]; $$n[0]={grep/\d/,@$n};print"@$n{1..4}\n" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 12:51:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1E716A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:51:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B4943D49 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:51:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050405125116.KQQE2192.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:51:16 -0400 From: To: "Gert Cuykens" , Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:51:17 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: efax with a serial 3com us robotics 56k modem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:51:18 -0000 I believe your xfax modem is what is called a winmodem. These type of cheap modems are built just for the ms/windows market and do not work on FreeBSD. They are missing the onboard hardware controller which is why you have to install the win driver that comes with it. http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php The above URL has very good step by step instructions on configurating ppp for external modem with info on how to verify if your modem is a winmodem. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gert Cuykens Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 12:14 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: efax with a serial 3com us robotics 56k modem yes i read the manual :P I have been reading about ppp and about sio and scrolled trough the big man efax The good news is TB-14R dmesg | grep sio usb0: USB revision 1.0 usb1: USB revision 1.0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A TB-14R The bad news is that there is no fax tutorial for freebsd dummies :) And i dont know wich serial port is sio0 or sio1 I connected the fax to god knows wich sio and said "ok modem start faxing" hoping for a mirical the sio was plug and play detected the fax and conected it with my email client so i could sent and receive faxes. Ps can you setup tty terminal trough usb ? It would be cool if i could replace my vidiocart with a usb cable :) _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 13:16:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA71F16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:16:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489BB43D31 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:16:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:18:36 -0500 Message-ID: <42528F92.4040501@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 08:16:02 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Hope - Linux CD Mall References: <200504052314.12460.orders@linuxcdmall.com> In-Reply-To: <200504052314.12460.orders@linuxcdmall.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Apr 2005 13:18:36.0554 (UTC) FILETIME=[F974E6A0:01C539E1] cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: listing on obtaining freebsd page X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:16:05 -0000 Chris Hope - Linux CD Mall wrote: >Good evening, > >I am enquiring about getting a listing on the obtaining freebsd page of >the online doucmentation at the following address: >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors.html > >Could you please reply to me with the email address of the appropriate >person to discuss this with. > >Many thanks, >Chris > > > Hello Chris, The FreeBSD Documentation Project is responsible for the project's web pages as well as its handbook, man pages and other documentation. It's possible that your request could be handled if you send mail to freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, the Doc Project's mailing list. HTH, Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 13:29:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB52A16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:29:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.local.net (ppp85-140-11-121.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [85.140.11.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE02243D39 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:29:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anatolytyukanov@tochka.ru) Received: from local.net ([192.168.0.1]) by mail.local.net with esmtp ID 1DIo6t-0000CH-8W for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:28:51 +0400 Message-ID: <42529292.1070102@tochka.ru> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:28:50 +0400 From: anatolytyukanov@tochka.ru User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050326) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050405120044.835DF16A4CE@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20050405120044.835DF16A4CE@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 93, Issue 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:29:02 -0000 use /usr/ports/security/openvpn, its much better. Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:04:59 -0500 From: Jay Hall Subject: mpd as a dial-up server To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <42527EEB.70409@vandaliamo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed I am in the process of adding dial-up capabilities to the FreeBSD servers I maintain so in the event of a problem, if the server starts, I can at least dial in and see what is wrong and hopefully correct the problem. I already have mpd in place for the VPN connections. Is it possible to use mpd with cu or tip as a dial-in solution? At this point in time, I have been able to connect to the FreeBSD server, but only see garbage on the screen. My guess is that I have conflicting modem settings on each end, but I wanted to make sure what I was doing would work before continuing. Thanks for your help. Jay ------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 13:30:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26AE16A4CE; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:30:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postino-1.etat.lu (postino-1.etat.lu [194.154.205.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BF743D5D; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:30:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu) Received: from avirus-1.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.6]) by postino-1.etat.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C6912A375A; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:30:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from avirus-1.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.6]) by localhost (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 1) with ESMTP id 07BA521318; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:30:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 1) with ESMTP id C8A732103C; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:30:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEH00HCX6U1T700@store.etat.lu>; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:30:01 +0200 (MEST) Received: from LUCY ([148.110.43.189]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEH00KMH6TY4XA0@store.etat.lu>; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:30:01 +0200 (MEST) Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:29:59 +0200 From: Didier Wiroth To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <0IEH00KMJ6U14XA0@store.etat.lu> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcU545BJvFkQ/biXT/q0+zeMCwh3vA== cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:30:06 -0000 Hi, I'm using freebsd 5.4-prerelease on my laptop. My laptop has an ati mobility radeon 9600. Unfortunately it has very poor console vesa support. SC_PIXEL_MODE does not work, 90x60 is the highest resolution I can get for now. It looks like I'm not the only one having this problem with ati chipsets: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1091839+1096057+/usr/local/w ww/db/text/2005/freebsd-questions/20050123.freebsd-questions I saw this posting: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-August/035621.ht ml Unfortunately I'm not a programmer and have no ... to very poor patching skills. It looks to me, that in this posting(s) a "few" patches are grouped together to enable vesa 1024x768. 1) Has someone applied this patches? 2) As the patch(es) is/are on the entire page, I don't know how to separate them. Would someone mail me as an attachment the different patches and tell me how I should apply them: for example, mail me patch1, patch2, patch3 and the explanation how to patch them: cd /usr/src patch < ~/patch1 patch < ~/patch2 ...etc In advance, many thanks! Didier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 13:36:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8C416A4CE; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:36:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sys34.mail.msu.edu (sys34.mail.msu.edu [35.9.75.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F26D43D41; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:36:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@msu.edu) Received: from jerrymc by sys34.mail.msu.edu with local (Exim 4.44 #1) id 1DIoEX-0000uG-UJ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:36:45 -0400 References: In-Reply-To: From: "Jerold McAllister" To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:36:45 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: cc: bob@a1poweruser.com cc: Jerry McAllister cc: dot.icabod@gmail.com cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: Randy Pratt cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Freebsd Install Guide Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:36:55 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt writes: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jerry >> McAllister > >> Well, both types of documentation are needed. The official formal >> documentation, which, of necessity , needs to be written in a rather >> formal language style and other explanitory docs for newbies and >> those of us who need a more conversational and step by step style >> at least to get started at things. There are several good books >> out with more conversational style and some reasonable web sites >> with tutorials. >> >> The only problem with many of the web sites and even the books is >> that they tend to take a personal preference prejucidial attitude >> toward things rather than encouraging readers to try out various >> things and giving them instruction toward those other choices. >> Some examples are installing and using Gnome. To read some guides, >> one would think it is impossible to run FreeBSD without Gnome. >> Some seem to imply it is absolutely necessary to install a third >> party MBR/boot manager such as Grub to boot FreeBSD, just because >> they like it. Some tend to think the only possible shell to use >> is bash or sh and anyone using something else can't possibly get their >> work done. The list could go on. >> > > That sort of thing may be present in some books but it wasn't in > mine. > > I will say one thing though, that a 3rd party book must specialize on > some aspect of FreeBSD if people are going to buy it. People that > buy documentation usually have a more specific need than that they > just want to boot FreeBSD on whatever spare PC they have lying around. > So, for example in my book all examples were Bourne shell, because > the focus of the book wasn't on running shells under UNIX. However I > never wrote in the book that that readers should only use Bourne. > In fact, on the section on system administration I specifically said > Bourne and csh wern't optimal for new users, and tcsh and bash were > more popular, followed by an overview of the major shells. Please > be careful where your swinging that tarpot and brush in the future. Sure, I know that. I probably should have continued the qualifier I used for the web site and said something like 'some of the books' since it would be what I meant. And the prejudices are different from one source to the next - it isn't the same everywhere. It is just something to be aware of. Even the official Handbook has a few personal prejudices that aren't really as absolute as the text may imply, though I haven't looked for any lately and it continues to be updated. ////jerry > > Ted Mittelstaedt > Author, The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide. > http://www.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 13:41:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D9416A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:41:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A82443D2F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:41:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:43:44 -0500 Message-ID: <42529577.6050409@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 08:41:11 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gert Cuykens References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Apr 2005 13:43:44.0679 (UTC) FILETIME=[7C5E8370:01C539E5] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: efax with a serial 3com us robotics 56k modem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:41:13 -0000 Gert Cuykens wrote: >I connected the fax >to god knows wich sio and said "ok modem start faxing" hoping >for a mirical > > I'm not absolutely certain about this, and I'm not a firm disbeliever in miracles, but I'm quite sure you'd have to actually _type_ a command into your keyboard ... :-D Kevin Kinsey P.S. > My USR Modem is at /dev/cuaa0. I found this out by trying both "/dev/cuaa1" and "dev/cuaa0" in etc/ppp/ppp.conf ... the one that worked was were my modem was. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 14:01:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C052816A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:01:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B4D43D46 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:01:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zhane1@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1472426rng for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:01:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=K/wUCib2rpEcoCNx73L+CaAJdSfzVMI0z/RT26coZiuOz368zvHQ7EY5a2KOGOUubKPq1DgccCAxEBSDcI1gvOAfU+qenmCNtQBWV8xDH5kds/kXcDlHt6UY9ZJiiB5lsCNtKNotmjXcRJRcB9WAEEjSPMa2ccnb5VvvQ9j4eRs= Received: by 10.38.161.30 with SMTP id j30mr1590330rne; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.86.23 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54103ab8050405070122d47361@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:01:15 +0500 From: zhane H To: questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: dmx3040@hotmail.com Subject: Hi please help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: zhane H List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:01:16 -0000 Hi dear staff at freebsd How may i check whether the hardware in my pc is supporte by freebsd 5.3 andalso i would liek to ask whcih one of freebsd do i install as i dont understand if i ahve to do i386 or some other one im instaling it on a msi board amd sempron 2200 with samsung cd-rw and a 10 gig seagate hdd Please contact me back as soon possible as im in very urgent need of help! Sincerely Zhan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 14:05:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C77E16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:05:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F0043D58 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:05:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j35E4pDa032541; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:04:51 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j35E5eDD019037; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:05:40 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j35E5eBB019036; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:05:40 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:05:40 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Gert Cuykens Message-ID: <20050405140540.GA19014@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:05:47 -0000 On 2005-04-05 09:53, Gert Cuykens wrote: > So my question is, for printing sake let there be a other way. > What do you use to print stuff, for example on a shared windows printer :) > > I guess there are only 3 choses LPD LPRng CUPS ? The print/apsfilter is my favorite. I use it at work, to print to the SMB-shared printers of our local Windows domain. I like it because it constantly reminds me of why I like using UNIX-based tools. You set them up and configure them once, and then literally forget all about them; they go on working unattended for as long as you feel like using them :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 14:08:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC4916A4D3 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:08:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88AC43D2F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:08:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxsec@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1781635wri for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:08:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ObWPgL4P1J5QLg7NsiqGJ6vbRA6QAQOelGreEaTBspdEmFyll7wr9sKDEs+eKp7jKRiFZFlkZKBaj6Xv2WS4spVuGCE+/0qKziCzK2VjTCq2lC6jBaZST//I0j7Vl9AaUmFB21NBiwF8MMWNDxpxeTnX9lqniVskk1OrKedjYxg= Received: by 10.54.56.3 with SMTP id e3mr1126326wra; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.4.73 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <72cf361e05040507084ba1f623@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:08:39 +0100 From: Martin Hepworth To: Kiffin Gish In-Reply-To: <000001c53763$b1a9ea80$9900000a@ZGISH> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <000001c53763$b1a9ea80$9900000a@ZGISH> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which mail server is the best for me? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Hepworth List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:08:40 -0000 I'd suggest exim,.... -- martin On Apr 2, 2005 10:09 AM, Kiffin Gish wrote: > I would like to setup a mail server but am a little confused about whether > to use sendmail, qmail, postfix or whatever. Basically my web server is a > simple one to be used for personal use with maybe no more than a 10-20 mail > accounts. > > What are the advantages and/or disadvantages of each choice, and where can I > find more information comparing them? > > -- > > Kiffin Rex Gish > Gouda, The Netherlands > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 14:28:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23ED16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:28:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp04.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4587B43D55 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:28:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-197-67.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) (209.6.197.67) by smtp04.mrf.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2005 10:28:50 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.91,152,1110171600"; d="scan'208"; a="18880040:sNHT20585128" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16978.41072.466917.552951@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:28:00 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <42525A1B.7060806@htlwrn.ac.at> References: <42525A1B.7060806@htlwrn.ac.at> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta20) "cilantro" (+CVS-20050310) XEmacs Lucid Subject: apcupsd with usb X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:28:51 -0000 Ing. Christian Sudec writes: > a few months back there was already a question in this list > regarding usb support in apcupsd since afaik only usb with linux > is still supported. But there was a beta version named > apcupsd-3.10.16-test2 which delivered the functions I need. Sad > but true the link was broken. > > Has anyone a working (beta) version of this freebsd-apcupsd with > usb-support? > > When will be usb officialy supported? (And no, I can not > workaround with serial, since the 1U-server doesn't have any) The folks at apcupsd are in the middle of rolling a new version - to be tagged either 3.10.17 or 3.11, I'm a little unclear - which will include the beta (I would call it gamma) FreeBSD USB code. The code is actually there, and can probably be had from their CVS; what's holding up the formal release (and therefore the port) is getting the documentation in sync. You may want to subscribe to the mailing list for more information. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 14:34:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E24316A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:34:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sys34.mail.msu.edu (sys34.mail.msu.edu [35.9.75.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E78943D58 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:34:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@msu.edu) Received: from jerrymc by sys34.mail.msu.edu with local (Exim 4.44 #1) id 1DIp8q-0001tr-Mh; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:34:56 -0400 References: <54103ab8050405070122d47361@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54103ab8050405070122d47361@mail.gmail.com> From: "Jerold McAllister" To: zhane H Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:34:56 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: cc: questions@FreeBSD.org cc: dmx3040@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Hi please help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:34:57 -0000 zhane H writes: > Hi dear staff at freebsd NOTE: FreeBSD does not have a "staff". Everyone is a volunteer. But people understand what you mean by your greeting. > How may i check whether the hardware in my pc is supporte by freebsd > 5.3 If you look on the FreeBSD web site at: http://www.freebsd.org/ you will see two releases listed over on the right hand side of the page. Under each there is a link called 'Hardware Notes' which will take you to a page that lists types of CPU. Click on one of those and you will get a list of hardware categories. Click on those to get specific lists of hardware devices. If you can find your hardware in those lists, you should have no problem. The difficult thing comes up when you have an item such as a sound card which uses the same chip as listed in one of the devices but it doesn't list your specific device model. Most of the time, it will also work, but no-one has tested it so they don't know for sure. > and also i would liek to ask whcih one of freebsd do i install as i > dont understand if i ahve to do i386 or some other one im instaling it > on a msi board amd sempron 2200 with samsung cd-rw and a 10 gig > seagate hdd If your CPU is an Intel type (including AMD 'clone') then choose i386 type. Only if you know your CPU is one of the others such as Alpha or sparc64 should you install for those. All regular PCs are the i386 type. NOTE, by the way, that FreeBSD 5.4 is scheduled to come out at the end of this month. It will have many improvements over 5.3. You may not want to wait to start hands on learning, but you may want to just install and experiment for now and then completely reinstall when 5.4 is released. Good luck, ////jerry > > Please contact me back as soon possible as im in very urgent need of help! > > > Sincerely Zhan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 14:36:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C6616A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:36:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postman.inteliport.com (postman.inteliport.com [208.27.31.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABE543D67 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:36:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from colane@inteliport.com) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (ip39.inteliport.net [208.27.31.39]) by postman.inteliport.com (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id j35EZkX20482 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:35:46 -0400 Message-ID: <4252A251.2060408@inteliport.com> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:36:01 -0400 From: Christopher Lane User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: question about mysql-server.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:36:11 -0000 Hi, Long story made short: The mysql-server.sh that came with mysql-server-4.1.10a (installed from cvsup'ed ports) wouldn't work until after I rebooted the server. It's working now, so I know I shouldn't complain, but anyone know what happened? Long story: 1. Minimum installation, added ports distribution, cvsup to latest ports. 2. cd /usr/ports/mysql41-server; make install 3. '/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server.sh start' does nothing. 4. I noticed that rc_subr wasn't installed, even though freshports says it is required. So I installed rc_subr from ports, but still no love. 5. I put mysql_enable="YES" in rc.conf (since I would soon want it there anyway) and restarted the server. 6. mysql-server.sh works like a charm now. Thanks in advance to anyone who can help shine some light on what might have changed that made mysql-server.sh work. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 14:51:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D0A16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:51:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55E943D39 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:51:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1486671rng for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:51:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=D/UBZVdMfPgQbe8/lCAGRYxjciYUPDfSc84Y4cbRY+q9t8reuxvgZsiVkrDxiZARGKvI+bjj4R602cfgOqYzACoIy5hYlAWK/dt8ORLArnN45Bs1mUPU3wDa5VcmCOdaHw27T4KxWFr+5viUxysAdZDQ/aANHrcWhpM2Tt0AbH8= Received: by 10.38.86.68 with SMTP id j68mr6467829rnb; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.98.28 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51d7a51605040507515405df70@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:51:01 -0700 From: perikillo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <51d7a516050404090660bb68ed@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <51d7a516050404090660bb68ed@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: (Solve)Re: Securelevel dont let ipf read rules... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: perikillo List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:51:04 -0000 One big mistake by my part. like you see below, i was having problems with= =20 secure level and ipf, but the problem was this: My old /etc/rc.conf was: kernel_securelevel=3D3 But after checking man rc.conf again, is kern_securelevel This way rc.conf dont let freebsd set that variable, now i can run ipf with= =20 the secure level 3, thanks to all. On Apr 4, 2005 9:06 AM, perikillo wrote: >=20 > Hi all, i was testing my firewaill with Freebsd 4.11 Release and ipf on= =20 > the kernel. I have ppp setup to run on every time i turn on the system, i= =20 > was using securelevel=3D2 on the /etc/sysctl.conf > kern.securelevel=3D2 > and /etc/rc.conf > /etc/rc.conf: > kernel_securelevel=3D2 >=20 > After i see that my firewall was ready to start his job, i decide to=20 > change the secure level to paranoid level and change the secure level to = 3: > /etc/sysctl.conf: > kern.securelevel=3D3 > /etc/rc.conf: > kernel_securelevel=3D3 >=20 > Went i restart my computer, and try to access with my other computer wich= =20 > use Windows 2k, i try to access the internet, and see that my browser don= t=20 > find nothing, make some test on it, but no access to the outside world. I= go=20 > back to my firewall and test the conecction: >=20 > test#ifconfig >=20 > This show that i was conected, then test with ping, fastest_cvsup none of= =20 > then reach the outside world. After this i test ipf : >=20 > test#ipfstat -hio > upsssssssssssssss, dont have any rules on my firewall, the i go to: >=20 > test# ee /var/log/console >=20 > I go to the end of the file and read my last boot up messages and see tha= t=20 > went my system try read the /etc/ipf.rules and /etc/ipmon.rules the syste= m=20 > secure level=3D3 on /etc/syctl.conf dont let ipf and ipnat to charge his = rules=20 > set.=20 > "Operation Not Permite" (something like this mmmm dont remember the right= =20 > messages :-\) >=20 > /etc/sysctl.conf goes before /etc/rc.conf, i was thinking that if i setup= =20 > securelevel=3D1 on sysctl.conf and then on rc.conf after ipf and ppp star= t,=20 > setup securelevel to 3, but my rc.conf dosent do nothing.=20 >=20 > How can i reach securelevel=3D3 and run my firewall, i dont want to input= =20 > nothing directly i want that baby(freebsd) do every thing automatically,= =20 > maybe i need to setup a script??? >=20 > Or i am doing something wrong? >=20 > I read man init but dont see nothing about this issue... >=20 > Thanks all for your comments. > NOTE: Freebsd 4.11 Release, ipfilter compile in the kernel. This machine= =20 > run only my firewall no servers is an old pentium 100Mhz. I try to write = my=20 > best english. >=20 >=20 >=20 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 14:53:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4834416A567 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:53:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB9F43D58 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:53:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) j35Er0bd035336; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:53:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9BFDC638D; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:53:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:53:00 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Gert Cuykens Message-ID: <20050405145300.GA60490@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Gert Cuykens , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! Organization: Me, organized? X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:53:03 -0000 --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:53:36AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote: > "USB interfaces, named for the Universal Serial Bus, can run at even > faster speeds than parallel or RS232 serial interfaces. Cables are > simple and cheap. USB is superior to RS232 Serial and to Parallel for > printing, but it is not as well supported under UNIX(r) systems. A way > to avoid this problem is to purchase a printer that has both a USB > interface and a Parallel interface, as many printers do." >=20 > lol, a very nice translation that says usb =3D no printing :) USB printing works, AFAICT. My Epson Stylus Photo 870 worked fine with USB. > So my question is, for printing sake let there be a other way.=20 > What do you use to print stuff, for example on a shared windows printer := )=20 >=20 > I guess there are only 3 choses LPD LPRng CUPS ? Not quite. The venerable lpr and LPRng are just printer spoolers. I.e. software to feed subsequent new print jobs to the right printer after the previous one has finished. On the other hand, apsfilter can convert many different file formats to something your printer can understand. Cups is like a combination of apsfilter and lpr, with an additional web interface. I've used apsfilter in the past, but now I prefer CUPS.=20 Roland --=20 R.F. Smith /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign r s m i t h @ x s 4 a l l . n l \ / No HTML/RTF in e-mail http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ X No Word docs in e-mail public key: http://www.keyserver.net / \ Respect for open standards --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUqZMEnfvsMMhpyURAtbbAJ0RvUVz/Jk3I/ovGCZEXCXFaNRWjACfTdeX 0jKKFF84WFH2j2mqyCewyhs= =bffk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 15:03:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2658E16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:03:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C844443D31 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:03:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.44] (port=1504 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DIpa4-000KjY-00; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:03:04 +0400 Message-ID: <4252A8A8.2050507@mail.ru> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:03:04 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gert Cuykens References: <200504050253.53879.danny@ricin.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:03:08 -0000 Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Apr 5, 2005 2:53 AM, Danny Pansters wrote: > >>On Tuesday 05 April 2005 00:46, Gert Cuykens wrote: >> >>>On Apr 4, 2005 9:54 PM, Andrew P. wrote: >>> >>>>Gert Cuykens wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Apr 4, 2005 12:04 PM, Andrew P. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Gert Cuykens wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Who do i ask if he / she would like to put this to the distribution >>>>>>>list >>>>>>> >>>>>>>[ ] cvsupdate-nogui >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Cant we make some user freebsd-voting list were we can vote for >>>>>>>changes :) >>>>>> >>>>>>Come to think about it, I kinda miss this option, too. >>>>> >>>>>Alrighdy thats 2 votes already :) >>>>>I say we go to the california and go run in circles holding a cvsup >>>>>pannel :) >>>> >>>>BTW, I'd also vote for /etc/rc.d/ftpd script >>> >>>Is the only way to setup a ftp by enabeling inetd ? >>>If so i want a /etc/rc.d/ftpd script too >> >>Standard ftpd runs through inetd. >> >> >>>PS Does sftp mean sshd + ftpd ? >> >>Nope. It's a subsystem of sshd, its client interface only resembles ftp just >>as scp resembles rcp. >> > > > i that case i dont need ftpd :) so i change my vote to leave all the > insecurity in one big insecure inetd server :) Should we load /sbin/init via inetd :)? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 15:06:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CECB16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:06:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60DF43D49 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:06:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 22500 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2005 15:06:15 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Apr 2005 15:06:15 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1FD3F2D; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:06:15 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <42519B5A.2040209@mail.ru> <200504050253.53879.danny@ricin.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 05 Apr 2005 11:06:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200504050253.53879.danny@ricin.com> Message-ID: <44zmwd8dqx.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: freebsd disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:06:16 -0000 Danny Pansters writes: > On Tuesday 05 April 2005 00:46, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > Is the only way to setup a ftp by enabeling inetd ? > > If so i want a /etc/rc.d/ftpd script too > > Standard ftpd runs through inetd. It *can* run as a daemon, without inetd. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 15:14:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A2316A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:14:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EEB43D49 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:14:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 15880 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2005 15:14:32 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Apr 2005 15:14:32 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 9BE592F; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:14:30 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Sergey Lapin References: <48239d3905040404285e13067b@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 05 Apr 2005 11:14:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48239d3905040404285e13067b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <44u0ml8dd5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 35 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dummynet problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:14:33 -0000 Sergey Lapin writes: > Hi, all! > Here I have a problem with dummynet. System is FreeBSD-5.3-STABLE month ago. > we have very small bandwidth from LAN. > rl0 is internal interface. > > ipfw rukes are (fwcmd=/sbin/ipfw): > ${fwcmd} pipe 1 config bw 60Kbit/s > ${fwcmd} add 778 pipe 1 tcp from any > 25,43,53,80,110,119,123,143,953,5190 to 192.168.0.0/25 out via rl0 > > ${fwcmd} queue 1 config pipe 1 weight 100 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff queue 5 > ${fwcmd} add 790 queue 1 log logamount 10 tcp from any to 192.168.0.99 > out via rl0 > > > ${fwcmd} queue 2 config pipe 1 weight 100 mask dst-ip 0x00000fff > buckets 150 queue 10 > ${fwcmd} queue 3 config pipe 1 weight 30 mask dst-ip 0x00000fff > buckets 150 queue 10 > ${fwcmd} queue 4 config pipe 1 weight 70 mask dst-ip 0x00000fff > buckets 150 queue 10 > ${fwcmd} add 791 queue 2 log logamount 10 tcp from any 5190 to > 192.168.0.0/25 out via rl0 > ${fwcmd} add 795 queue 3 log logamount 10 tcp from any 80,3128,21,20 > to 192.168.0.0/25 out via rl0 > ${fwcmd} add 792 queue 4 log logamount 10 tcp from any > 25,110,43,53,119,123,143,953 to 192.168.0.0/25 out via rl0 > > Thanks a lot! I don't use dummynet myself, but surely it would be easier to help you if you described what the actual problem is? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 15:20:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E5E16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:20:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxc1.crockettint.com (chameleon1.crockettint.com [206.224.72.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4104943D45 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:20:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emartinez@crockettint.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.crockettint.com [127.0.0.1]) by mxc1.crockettint.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F12836EB6; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:20:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mxc1.crockettint.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mxc1.crockettint.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93557-04; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:20:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from memnoch (ausc1.crockettint.com [24.153.230.82]) by mxc1.crockettint.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D9836EC5; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:20:27 -0500 (CDT) From: "Edgar Martinez" To: "'Emanuel Strobl'" , Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:20:28 -0500 Organization: Crockett International MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcU5wAy6x9dHnC+wQH6x6pxn/1/XsAAMODEg In-Reply-To: <200504051115.25902@harrymail> Message-Id: <20050405152027.D3D9836EC5@mxc1.crockettint.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at crockettint.com Subject: RE: Promise TX2 Rebuild via atacontrol?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: emartinez@crockettint.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:20:33 -0000 I apologize...I usually am the one complaining to others about versioning...my bad... I do not think that the drive is at fault as much as the controller. I have had to deploy well over one hundred of the exact same configuration, and historically, it's always been the controller that just drops the drive for some reason. I usually end up re-mirroring the array on the old "dead" drive and the system will continue on its merry way (last one is over 1 year old since last resync)...hence you see why I am curious if I could just use atacontrol instead of taking the unit offline and spending 45min waiting for the resync.... ######## TECHNOJARGON BELOW ######## FBSD 5.3 STABLE Promise TX2 Orig BIOS ad4: 114473MB [232581/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA100 ad6: 114473MB [232581/16/63] at ata3-master UDMA100 ar0: 114440MB [14589/255/63] status: READY subdisks: disk0 READY on ad4 at ata2-master disk1 READY on ad6 at ata3-master Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ar0s1a ad4: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=5861119 ad4: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA timed out ar0: WARNING - mirror lost -----Original Message----- From: Emanuel Strobl [mailto:emanuel.strobl@gmx.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 4:15 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; emartinez@crockettint.com Subject: Re: Promise TX2 Rebuild via atacontrol?? Am Montag, 4. April 2005 23:29 schrieb Edgar Martinez: > All, > > > > I have a failed member in a RAID1 array and using atacontrol can see that > the status is degraded. I am curious if I can use atacontrol to rebuild the > array if the original array was built using the Promise BIOS utility. If I > tell atacontrol to rebuild.will it corrupt my data or catch fire and > explode?? You don't tell us what version you use, but promise is supported very well, even in atamkII in 6-current. If you replace the failed drive it sould be automatically rebuilt, the `atacontrol rebuild ar0` doesn't work as long as you (in 5.x) used "addspare" or the controller found a good "spare" drive. In 4.x you don't have the addspare option, you have to `atacontrol detach 3` and reattach it the same way to get recognized and inserted as spare in an existing array. -Harry > > > > Cheers! > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 15:27:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFCA16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:27:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from publications.ftw.tuwien.ac.at (nt-ftw.ftw.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.90.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C3243D45 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:27:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petrasch@FTW.at) Received: from nt_ftw.ftw.tuwien.ac.at by publications.ftw.tuwien.ac.at ESMTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:48:58 +0100 Received: from erriapo.ftw.local ([192.168.0.47]) by mail.ftw.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:29:02 +0200 From: "Martin Petraschek" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:29:03 +0200 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2380) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Apr 2005 15:29:03.0016 (UTC) FILETIME=[32643A80:01C539F4] Subject: Viewing DNS cache entries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Petraschek List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:27:14 -0000 Hi! The operating system is caching DNS name resolutions in order to avoid repeated DNS requests for the same hostname. Is it possible to display the entries of that DNS cache? Under Windows, the command "ipconfig /displaydns" exists, and I would need that functionality under FreeBSD. Thank you, Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 15:29:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CF416A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:29:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA00743D3F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:29:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 25165 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2005 15:29:24 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Apr 2005 15:29:24 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 6226D2D; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:29:23 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Kenneth A. Bond" References: <20050404133030.37194.qmail@web90206.mail.scd.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 05 Apr 2005 11:29:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050404133030.37194.qmail@web90206.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <44psx98coc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 34 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Keeping installed packages up to date X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:29:25 -0000 "Kenneth A. Bond" writes: > I have followed the steps outlined in Richard > Bejtlich's document Keeping FreeBSD Applications > Up-To-Date > (http://www.taosecurity.com/keeping_freebsd_applications_up-to-date.html) Did you look at the official FreeBSD documentation before following third-party advice? Both the FreeBSD FAQ and FreeBSD Handbook have advice on this. > My question is: is there an easier way of updating my > installed packages? Several. You might try ctm(1). Fuller details are in the Handbook, if I recall. Anonymous cvs access could work too, but is unlikely to be allowed through the firewall if cvsup is not. > The process described above is > incredibly time-consuming. I would like to know if > there is a less time consuming method, since I have > managers foaming at the mouth for my servers to be up > and online with the latest updates, as soon as > possible. Are these the same managers who are insisting on blocking cvsup for security reasons? If corporate security policy is to disallow system updates, perhaps it would be inappropriate for you to find a way to circumvent the security policy... If you think that circumventing the security policy *is* what you want to do, you could consider tunneling your cvsup connections through ssh(1) or some similar technique. Or you could make things easier by simply automating the (early parts of the) procedure you're currently using. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 15:30:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CA216A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:30:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail25.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail25.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9A143D53 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:30:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 24156 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2005 15:30:32 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail25.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Apr 2005 15:30:32 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id C568D30; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:30:31 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Andre Nas References: <20050404145150.80105.qmail@web42110.mail.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 05 Apr 2005 11:30:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050404145150.80105.qmail@web42110.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <44ll7x8cmg.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 6 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sysinstall in Xterm in color ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:30:33 -0000 Andre Nas writes: > How to make sysinstall menu in xterm have origin color (blue yellow) not black and white. It does for me. [-STABLE, up-to-date XOrg] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 15:33:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A6B16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:33:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.km.kongsberg.com (mail.kmss.no [193.69.71.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAA043D55 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:33:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chip.wiegand@simrad.com) In-Reply-To: <4218.24.98.86.57.1112659882.squirrel@24.98.86.57> To: jbell@stelesys.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Build V70_M4_01112005 Beta 3NP January 11, 2005 Message-ID: From: Chip Wiegand Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:33:01 -0700 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on SMTP02/DMZ(Release 6.5.3FP1|December 15, 2004) at 05.04.2005 17:29:33, Serialize complete at 05.04.2005 17:29:33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" cc: FreeBSD List Subject: Re: screwy network/dmz problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:33:08 -0000 "Jerry Bell" wrote on 04/04/2005 05:11:22 PM: > The first thing I would check is that it's the BSD box that you are > actually pinging. I'd try unplugging it and trying the ping again from > the IIS box. Barring that, I would double and triple check the network > mask on the BSD box. Also, make sure you don't have some screwy firewall > rules on the BSD server that prevent outbound pings. > Next, look at the output of 'netstat -rn' Results of netstat -rn: destination gateway flags refs use netif default 157.237.165.1 ugs 0 122 fxp0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 uh 0 6 lo0 157.237.165/29 link#1 uc 0 0 fxp0 157.237.165.1 00:02:b3:a4:c2 uhlm 1 0 fxp0 > You should see entries for the default gateway as well as your local > network. If all looks good there, check your arp table with arp -a. Results of arp -a: ?(157.237.165.1) at 00:02:b3:bd:c2 on fxp0 [ethernet] ?(157.237.165.2) at 00:0d:61:70:df on fxp0 [ethernet] ?(157.237.165.4) at 00:eo:18:c2:12 on fxp0 [ethernet] > If you don't see anything there, it's probably a layer 1 or 2 problem > (cabling/vlan). There are 3 boxes on the dmz - 157.237.165.2 is the IIS box. It gets no ping reply from the BSD box and the firewall. It does get a reply from the win2003 box. It has full internet access. It is a current, working, 'live' web server for authorized users only. 157.237.165.4 is a WIN2003 box and it gets ping responses from the IIS box and the BSD box, no response from the firewall, and no internet access. 157.237.165.5 is the BSD box, gets a ping response from the IIS box only, no response from the win2003 box, or firewall, and no internet access. (157.237.165.1 is the firewall dmz nic itself, the gateway for all 3 boxes) I'm guessing that there is a rule on the firewall that has closed the internet connection for these two additional boxes. The IIS was the first to be set up a year of so ago. There must also be a rule on the firewall that drops all incoming ping requests. Questions from the above: Why does BSD box get reply from the IIS box, yet the IIS box get no reply from the BSD box? Why does the IIS box get reply from the Win2003 box, yet not from the BSD box? All 3 boxes have the same network setup, except for this: There is no 'domain' for the 3 boxes. The IIS box is on its own workgroup DMZ, the win2003 box is its own domain 'test.local'. The BSD box has 'domain simrad.com' as the first line of resolv.conf. What are the implications of this? I will be sending a message to the firewall administrator in Norway (I am in the US) with the info above, maybe he can find something on the firewall to change to make everything work. I hope. Regards, Chip > There are many many possibilities for what could be wrong, but it's hard > for us to say. Let us know what you find on those tests. > > Jerry > http://www.syslog.org > > > here in our office we have a firewall running Firewall-1 (it is > > administered remotely from another office in another country). It is set > > up with a dmz so I can host a web server (which is running IIS), but it > > works. I am now adding another web server, running Apache/FreeBSD. Problem > > is the FBSD box does not ping anything. The IIS box can ping the FBSD box > > and get a response from it. I have used the same network settings on the > > FBSD box that are on the IIS box, changing only the ipaddress. I don't > > understand why the FBSD box only responds with network not found when > > trying to ping anything. Now the IIS box is not a member of any network, > > it is it's own workgroup called DMZ. Is the problem that the FBSD box > > needs to be a member of the workgroup DMZ? And if so, how do I get it > > there? > > > > Regards, > > Chip > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 15:33:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA9616A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:33:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6AE43D53 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:33:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DIq0t-0007Y1-Ar for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:30:47 +0200 Received: from pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net ([68.83.169.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:30:47 +0200 Received: from apeiron+usenet by pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:30:47 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christopher Nehren Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Organization: /usr/bin/false Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: <20050405065523.GB90985@gnezdov.net> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: Problem with 'pkgdb -F' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:33:16 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-04-05, Sergei Gnezdov scribbled these curious markings: > Here is the interaction with pkgdb. If I start 'pkgdb -F' after > running it once, the process will repeat itself. > > owl2-root % pkgdb -F > ---> Checking the package registry database > Stale origin: 'multimedia/nautilus-media': perhaps moved or obsoleted. > -> The port 'multimedia/nautilus-media' was removed on 2005-03-12 because: The first thing that you need to do is read UPDATING. The second thing that you need to do is read UPDATING. The third thing that you need to do you should know, because you've read UPDATING (but here's a hint, it has something to do with nautilus-media). Not reading UPDATING is a very good way of breaking your ports tree. I'm fairly certain that this is (part of) the reason for why you've had so many problems. Best Regards, Christopher Nehren -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUq8kk/lo7zvzJioRAsIQAJ9psqLYOseMfNkpGDMfE94e/RsROACfeoJI cglMQ6uFBTSKmD177Voh124= =yOAK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson If you ask the wrong questions, you get answers like "42" and "God". Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 15:36:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B0416A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:36:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7487343D31 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:36:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j35FaZMh085065; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:36:35 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:36:35 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Martin Petraschek Message-ID: <20050405153635.GC64927@dan.emsphone.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Viewing DNS cache entries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:36:36 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 05), Martin Petraschek said: > The operating system is caching DNS name resolutions in order to > avoid repeated DNS requests for the same hostname. Is it possible to > display the entries of that DNS cache? > > Under Windows, the command "ipconfig /displaydns" exists, and I would > need that functionality under FreeBSD. You can use the "rndc dump" command, which will create a file that contains all of the currently-cached DNS entries. If you are running a chrooted named (default in 5.*), add this line to /etc/namedb/named.conf in the options{} section: dump-file "/var/dump/named_dump.db"; , then run "rndc reconfig" and "rndc dump". The dumpfile will end up in /var/named/var/dump/named_dump.db. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 15:49:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708EB16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:49:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mfc.musees-franchecomte.com (mfc.musees-franchecomte.com [195.140.143.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F9943D2F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:49:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mihamina@mail.rktmb.org) Received: by mfc.musees-franchecomte.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id A0999813EB8; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:50:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (116.68.98-84.rev.gaoland.net [84.98.68.116]) by mfc.musees-franchecomte.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA356813EB5 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:50:13 +0200 (CEST) From: "Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:49:18 +0200 Message-Id: <1112716158.16101.17.camel@fctmp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on mfc.musees-franchecomte.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_IN_XBL autolearn=no version=3.0.2 Subject: how to be a freeBSD mirror X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:49:25 -0000 Hello, We're the stuff of the free software department at the university of Orléans (France) We'd like to be a mirror of freee BSD (all arches, all branches) What documentation would you recommend us to read about technical tips and admnistrative request to the FreeBSD project team? The server is running Debian/Linux. -- Get a fully managed dedicated server for ¤200/month ($257/month) No time limit for taking care of your server. You keep the "root" acces if you want. Billing periods are 3 months. See the conditions at http://aspo.rktmb.org/activities/managed_servers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 15:51:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499CE16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:51:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0C743D31 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:51:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 11299 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2005 15:51:47 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Apr 2005 15:51:47 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id F00232D; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:51:45 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Iain Dooley" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 05 Apr 2005 11:51:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44hdil8bn2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Maintaining a Minimal Installation for a Small HDD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:51:48 -0000 "Iain Dooley" writes: > do i need to edit the Makefiles? how can i cvsup only those programs > in contrib that i need? my aim here is to have a compact source tree > that i can use cvsup to keep current, but only takes up a couple of > hundred meg. Doing this is not supported. One of FreeBSD's strong points is the fact that it *is* a whole operating system, not just a collection of pieces. That doesn't mean it's impossible -- lots of us are using partial subsets of the source tree for embedded projects -- but it does mean that anyone trying to do so are pretty much on our own. Your easiest path for a source upgrade is probably to do a remote mount of disk space over a network (beware security concerns...) and use that to hold a full source tree. It will be slow, but just leave it to do the build over the weekend and you should be set (or do the build itself on another machine, and just install from there). The recommended path is to do a binary upgrade. 5.4 will be out in a few weeks, and release candidate builds are available now. Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 16:00:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E73916A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:00:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from iaces.com (horton.iaces.com [204.147.87.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CF143D1D for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:00:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptroot@iaces.com) Received: from [204.147.87.125] (borg.iaces.com [204.147.87.125]) by iaces.com (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j35G0QER058718 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:00:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ptroot@iaces.com) Message-ID: <4252B638.5050506@iaces.com> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:00:56 -0500 From: "Paul T. Root" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: vinum trouble on 5.3-Stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:00:29 -0000 I upgraded to 5.3 on one system a while ago. And when it boots up vinum panics the system on startup with this message: panic: unmount: dangling vnode I found that if I boot in single user mode and mount / to make it rw, then start vinum, everything is fine. I just patched the kernel for the sendfile bug so this has come up again. Is this an order of execution problem? Do I change when vinum is started? What the solution. I'm happy (apart from this) with 5.x and plan to upgrade my main server to 5.x. Now that I got a good handle (I think on bind 9). Thanks, Paul. -- ______ Paul T. Root / _ \ 1977 MGB / /|| \\ ||\/ || _ | || || || \ ||__// \______/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 16:33:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8271D16A5C3 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:33:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Gina.esfm.ipn.mx (esfm.ipn.mx [148.204.102.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A6443D4C for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:33:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from mail.esfm.ipn.mx (Gina.esfm.ipn.mx [148.204.102.61]) by Gina.esfm.ipn.mx (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j35GW16a004512 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:32:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from 201.135.130.41 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mrspock); by mail.esfm.ipn.mx with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:32:01 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <63501.201.135.130.41.1112718721.squirrel@201.135.130.41> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:32:01 -0500 (CDT) From: mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: shell question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:33:29 -0000 Hello FreeBSD gurus! I address you in hope of enlightment. Here is the problem: I have a program that creates a PostScript output and writes it to its standard output. This program also writes diagnostic messages to the standard error output at the same time, in this case the messages are written in plain text. I need to concatenate the standard output and then standard error output in a file, but I need to convert the standard output into PostScript before the concatenation. program stdout 2> stderr cat stdout > out a2ps stdout >> out a2ps is in the ports and it converts plain text into PostScript. The problem is that I don't want to use the temporary file that I used above (stdout, stderr, out), I just want a "filter" In a diagram, it can be seen as: stdin ==> program ==> [stdout, a2ps(stderr)] I have tried: cat stdin | program 2> tmp | ( cat && a2ps tmp ) but I still need a temporary file. Can it be done? Can you help me and tell me how ? Thanks in advance. -Eduardo. PS. Please, answer to my e-mail address, I am not subscribed to the list. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:03:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439FA16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:03:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com (wolf.pjkh.com [66.228.196.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFA043D48 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:03:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE97E5516; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wolf.pjkh.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28670-02; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 74D5B54E2; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF1D54C0; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:03:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Philip Hallstrom To: "Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina" In-Reply-To: <1112716158.16101.17.camel@fctmp> Message-ID: <20050405100310.G28809@wolf.pjkh.com> References: <1112716158.16101.17.camel@fctmp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-955325999-1112720600=:28809" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pjkh.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to be a freeBSD mirror X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:03:25 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-955325999-1112720600=:28809 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs/index.html On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote: > Hello, > > We're the stuff of the free software department at the university of > Orl=E9ans (France) > > We'd like to be a mirror of freee BSD (all arches, all branches) > > What documentation would you recommend us to read about technical tips > and admnistrative request to the FreeBSD project team? > > The server is running Debian/Linux. > --=20 > Get a fully managed dedicated server for =A4200/month ($257/month) > No time limit for taking care of your server. > You keep the "root" acces if you want. Billing periods are 3 months. > See the conditions at http://aspo.rktmb.org/activities/managed_servers > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > --0-955325999-1112720600=:28809-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:03:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0094516A4CF for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:03:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsf15.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf15.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FAB43D4C for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:03:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jawn@charter.net) Received: from mxip02.cluster1.charter.net (mxip02a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.132])j35H3PSH004249 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:03:25 -0400 Received: from res-66-169-4-046.spa.sc.charter.com (HELO solaris) (66.169.4.46) by mxip02.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2005 13:03:25 -0400 Message-Id: <3rr04b$oie03j@mxip02a.cluster1.charter.net> X-Ironport-AV: i="3.91,152,1110171600"; d="scan'208"; a="824639603:sNHT12996248" From: "John Hall" To: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:03:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcU6AVw2/LeSsCKQSkqCYD8kCQ1WNw== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: PRERELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:03:28 -0000 We currently have 5.4-PRERELEASE installed on our web box: outpost# uname -a FreeBSD outpost.blacklotus.net 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Mar 30 13:38:38 MST 2005 hallj@outpost.blacklotus.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/OUTPOST i386 I need to know if we need to update the server to 5.4-RELEASE with this version of 5.4 in order to protect against the sendfile kernel memory problem in the security notice at: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:02.sendfile. asc Thanks! John Hall [jhall@lotuscom.net] Manager of Operations Black Lotus Communications [http://www.blacklotus.net] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:26:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB0216A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:26:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96F743D1F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:26:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-77.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.77]) by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DCE0123B8C; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:25:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B47B12B032; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:26:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30305-06; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:26:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from alpha (alpha.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7155D12B015; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:26:21 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?B?Qmr2cm4gS/ZuaWc=?= To: , Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:27:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <63501.201.135.130.41.1112718721.squirrel@201.135.130.41> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcU5/c5Ea+8EhYgWTqCWjR7pEo1oggABlibQ Message-Id: <20050405172621.7155D12B015@eurystheus.local> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Subject: RE: shell question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:26:28 -0000 mrspock at esfm dot ipn dot mx wrote: > I need to concatenate the standard output and then standard=20 > error output in a file, but I need to convert the standard > output into PostScript before the concatenation. >=20 > program stdout 2> stderr > cat stdout > out > a2ps stdout >> out >=20 > a2ps is in the ports and it converts plain text into PostScript. >=20 > The problem is that I don't want to use the temporary file > that I used above (stdout, stderr, out), I just want a "filter" program < stdin 3>&1 1>&2 2>&3 | a2ps Regards Bj=F6rn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:26:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5979E16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:26:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0370443D41 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:26:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:29:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4252CA5C.9040706@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:26:52 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Hall References: <3rr04b$oie03j@mxip02a.cluster1.charter.net> In-Reply-To: <3rr04b$oie03j@mxip02a.cluster1.charter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Apr 2005 17:29:26.0304 (UTC) FILETIME=[03CE8200:01C53A05] cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PRERELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:26:55 -0000 John Hall wrote: >We currently have 5.4-PRERELEASE installed on our web box: > >outpost# uname -a >FreeBSD outpost.blacklotus.net 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Wed >Mar 30 13:38:38 MST 2005 >hallj@outpost.blacklotus.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/OUTPOST i386 > >I need to know if we need to update the server to 5.4-RELEASE with this >version of 5.4 in order to protect against the sendfile kernel memory >problem in the security notice at: > >ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:02.sendfile. >asc > >Thanks! > >John Hall [jhall@lotuscom.net] >Manager of Operations >Black Lotus Communications >[http://www.blacklotus.net] > > I don't think it's possible to update to 5.4-RELEASE, as it doesn't exist yet AFAICT from the web site. I've not checked the CVS repo or mirrors, so I guess it's possible that it has been tagged in the last couple of days, though. Updating to any codebase from today or following the patch method outlined in the announcement should make you safe from this vulnerability. See the Handbook chapter on "the Cutting Edge". The RELEASE tag you'd want would be "RELENG_5", I expect. Whoops, OK: now I see that apparently 5.4 has been tagged. As mentioned in the advisory, you can either patch your system and recompile the kernel or update to one of seven different code paths to get the new code. If you server was built just a week ago, then 5.4-RELEASE sounds great for this purpose, and the only viable choices for you are RELENG_5, RELENG_5_4, or RELENG_5_3. However, the recommended procedure for the entire world reinstall includes some time (not much, probably) spent in single-user mode, so if this is a busy box that needs 99.99 percent uptime, maybe the kernel rebuild would be better, as a simple reboot on the new kernel would be the only thing required.... I'm sure that this statement might be open to debate.... Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:30:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A38416A4D2 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:30:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2016C43D58 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:30:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DIrpM-0002QF-AU for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:27:00 +0200 Received: from dsl092-076-225.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.76.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:27:00 +0200 Received: from jdarnold by dsl092-076-225.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:27:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jonathan Arnold Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:20:42 -0400 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <003101c5386f$af071750$230110ac@fortunato> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dsl092-076-225.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050202 MultiZilla/1.7.0.2d X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, ja In-Reply-To: <003101c5386f$af071750$230110ac@fortunato> Sender: news Subject: Re: Boot manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:30:13 -0000 Teilhard Knight wrote: > Could you recommend a good boot manager, please? I mean, to boot several > OSs, but not relying on Lilo. Not Xosl, because it doesn't work together > with a Drive Overlay. I used to use System Commander, but have found the last few releases to be very unreliable, so I've since moved to BootIt NG, from Terabyte: http://www.terabyteunlimited.com/bootitng.html and have been very happy with it. -- Jonathan Arnold (mailto:jdarnold@buddydog.org) Daemon Dancing in the Dark, a FreeBSD weblog: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:30:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2996816A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:30:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EAC43D3F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:30:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-77.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.77]) by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE0F123CB9; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:29:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE1412B032; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:30:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30399-08; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:30:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from alpha (alpha.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF2012B015; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:30:32 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?B?Qmr2cm4gS/ZuaWc=?= To: , Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:31:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20050405172621.7155D12B015@eurystheus.local> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcU5/c5Ea+8EhYgWTqCWjR7pEo1oggABlibQAAA9nxA= Message-Id: <20050405173032.4BF2012B015@eurystheus.local> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Subject: RE: shell question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:30:38 -0000 > > program stdout 2> stderr > > cat stdout > out > > a2ps stdout >> out You meant program stdout 2> stderr cat stdout > out a2ps **stderr** >> out Don't you? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:34:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E1816A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:34:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A8343D3F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:34:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 30836 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2005 17:34:44 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Apr 2005 17:34:43 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id B30F82D; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:34:42 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Danny Pansters References: <200504050333.00209.danny@ricin.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 05 Apr 2005 13:34:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200504050333.00209.danny@ricin.com> Message-ID: <447jjhgma5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Temperature and fan speed on INTEL D925CV2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:34:44 -0000 Danny Pansters writes: > I have an INTEL D925CV2 baord in my new box. Does anyone know if/how I can get > temperature - fan speed - other measurements from it? > > (No, lmmon does not work) I have no idea, but have you tried enabling acpi_thermal(4)? -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:36:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E314916A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:36:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DE943D2F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:36:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 10939 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2005 17:36:47 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Apr 2005 17:36:47 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id B025A2D; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:36:46 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "T.F. Cheng" References: <20050405025122.14510.qmail@web51002.mail.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 05 Apr 2005 13:36:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050405025122.14510.qmail@web51002.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <443bu5gm6p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: can't make iso image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:36:48 -0000 "T.F. Cheng" writes: > Hi, > I want to make ISO image in order to burn a CD, but > both mkisofs and vcdimager failed to do so, mkisofs > reported as: > >>mkisofs: Input/output error. cannot read from > foo.mpg > while vcdimager said: > >>**ERROR: fread (): Input/output error > but other files have no problem making ISO by the 2 > apps. > > > This is on freebsd/i386, 5.4pre-release. Is the file readable by anything? Try tarring it up to somewhere else on your hard disk... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:41:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10C416A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:41:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B76043D2F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:41:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050405174148.XRPK7277.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish> for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:41:48 -0400 From: To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:41:47 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: 4.12 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:41:50 -0000 Is there going to be a 4.12 release?? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:44:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B015C16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:44:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr (smtp9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649DD43D2F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:44:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0901.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E2EC52001451 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:44:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0901.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BFA002001459 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:44:27 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050405174427785.BFA002001459@mwinf0901.wanadoo.fr Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:44:27 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1284503612.20050405194427@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200504051109.01670@harrymail> References: <20050404091719.GA9748@lothlorien.nagual.st> <4251C915.1000009@cloudview.com> <200504051109.01670@harrymail> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: HZ=1000 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:44:29 -0000 Emanuel Strobl writes: > Sorry, a bit OT, but I'm really impressed how constant power line frequency > is. It isn't just in Germany. A number of power utilities work hard to keep line frequency extremely constant, specifically for the purpose of allowing the frequency to be used to discipline clocks. Still, I think you can do far better with NTP. -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:44:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0CC16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:44:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1185243D3F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:44:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5D6B451218; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:44:50 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: bob@a1poweruser.com Message-ID: <20050405174450.GB86957@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: Re: 4.12 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:44:51 -0000 --H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:41:47PM -0400, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > Is there going to be a 4.12 release?? No. Kris --H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUs6SWry0BWjoQKURAoFqAKDFDDnnBSVslfegbGHec9JnBCZbnwCdFTxk Xa7VLNJ/HYJa5foR0Oi1dpc= =hFxR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:46:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF1616A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:46:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shiva.nextrials.com (shiva.nextrials.com [64.81.74.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A167543D4C for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:46:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dannyman@toldme.com) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (mito.sr.nextrials.com [192.168.1.102]) by shiva.nextrials.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD033C288A for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:46:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4252CED8.8030802@toldme.com> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:46:00 -0700 From: Danny Howard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050328) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1183736361.20050405031743@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <1183736361.20050405031743@wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Securely allowing just one application via telnet X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:46:07 -0000 Anthony, "Securely" and "telnet" is an oxymoron. This is mainly because any data, including passwords, sent through a non-encrypted connection, can be sniffed by anyone who can access any of the intervening networks. Your question is really very open-ended and vague. The correct question may be "I need to facilitate FOO." and then go about solving that. When you ask "I need to do something with telnet," I am inclined to say "I bet you are asking the wrong question." One (easier) way is to use a traditional login shell and set the config file to pass execution to your application. For example, if the user is set to use csh, you can put "exec fooprog" in his .login. An advantage of this is that you can set environment variables and stuff before handing execution to this application. If you do this, and you can not trust your user (he's using telnet, so his password is easy to steal,) then you want to look at how your development system handles signals. You don't want him sending some clever signal to your system that lets them sneak out in to something else. That said, if you set a user's shell (See /etc/master.passwd and the excellent pw program,) to your executable, then that is the program that will be executed as the user's login shell. (I once set up a user on my system to launch freeciv on the remote terminal so some friends and I could play this game in my dorm laboratory from the workstation in my dorm room. I think I just set the shell init file to "exec freeciv" and disabled the user when we weren't playing games. :) Another way is to put the program in inetd.conf ... you just telnet to some port, and things happen. This is like putting the program in as the user shell, but there are fewer insecure layers (telnet tends to have security advisories crop up) but you wont have telnet asking for a password for you. Anyway, good luck. Sincerely, -danny -- http://dannyman.toldme.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:51:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9193616A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:51:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shiva.nextrials.com (shiva.nextrials.com [64.81.74.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6952543D1F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:51:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dannyman@toldme.com) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (mito.sr.nextrials.com [192.168.1.102]) by shiva.nextrials.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6413C2899 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4252D032.9020905@toldme.com> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:51:46 -0700 From: Danny Howard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050328) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <136953345.20050405073122@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <136953345.20050405073122@wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Digital Cameras X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:51:48 -0000 Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > >You might be better off removing the card and using a card reader. Card >reader specs are much more generalized and consistent than digital >camera specs. If the type of card/reader your camera uses is unsupported >by FreeBSD, at least you have a better chance of getting support for it >in the future than you would for a specific model of a specific camera. > > > Hello, I second this suggestion! Get a USB media adaptor, plug it in, the device should pop right up, then you use the mount command and add it like a disk drive, copy your photos, clean up the disk, unmount, and you are done! (I have no idea if this works with memory sticks, but say, Canon cameras are always putting an MSDOS filesystem on the CF card.) Another tip: reading the data is only half the battle. Personally, managing pictures is one of the three things I do with my Windows computer. (The other two are games and Quicken.) The XP/2k file browser in "thumbnail" mode is very nice for managing pictures. And you can download stuff like Picasa. (Though, Flickr is a lot like "online Picasa" but you have to pay a yearly subscription fee, and the photo manipulation stuff depends on Flash plugin, so, for now, you need Windows to rotate your uploaded images ....) Cheers, -danny -- http://dannyman.toldme.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:51:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC9516A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:51:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E821943D1F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:51:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3714C60F3; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:51:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41909-05; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:51:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [63.117.97.221]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C4C60E7; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:51:42 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4252D026.40703@makeworld.com> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:51:34 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Danny Howard References: <1183736361.20050405031743@wanadoo.fr> <4252CED8.8030802@toldme.com> In-Reply-To: <4252CED8.8030802@toldme.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Securely allowing just one application via telnet X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:51:55 -0000 Danny Howard wrote: > Anthony, > > "Securely" and "telnet" is an oxymoron. This is mainly because any > data, including passwords, sent through a non-encrypted connection, > can be sniffed by anyone who can access any of the intervening > networks. Your question is really very open-ended and vague. The > correct question may be "I need to facilitate FOO." and then go about > solving that. When you ask "I need to do something with telnet," I am > inclined to say "I bet you are asking the wrong question." > > One (easier) way is to use a traditional login shell and set the > config file to pass execution to your application. For example, if > the user is set to use csh, you can put "exec fooprog" in his .login. > An advantage of this is that you can set environment variables and > stuff before handing execution to this application. If you do this, > and you can not trust your user (he's using telnet, so his password is > easy to steal,) then you want to look at how your development system > handles signals. You don't want him sending some clever signal to > your system that lets them sneak out in to something else. > > That said, if you set a user's shell (See /etc/master.passwd and the > excellent pw program,) to your executable, then that is the program > that will be executed as the user's login shell. > (I once set up a user on my system to launch freeciv on the remote > terminal so some friends and I could play this game in my dorm > laboratory from the workstation in my dorm room. I think I just set > the shell init file to "exec freeciv" and disabled the user when we > weren't playing games. :) > > Another way is to put the program in inetd.conf ... you just telnet to > some port, and things happen. This is like putting the program in as > the user shell, but there are fewer insecure layers (telnet tends to > have security advisories crop up) but you wont have telnet asking for > a password for you. > > Anyway, good luck. > > Sincerely, > -danny > Also keep in mind that starting an SSH tunnel can allow you to do many things also. One that comes to mind (and I think the handbook explains it) is mail. Setting up routines that make use of an SSH tunnel is not hard to do. Best regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:53:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808D016A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:53:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399E543D39 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:53:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.44] (port=1673 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx1.mail.ru with asmtp id 1DIsFK-000AeU-00; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:53:50 +0400 Message-ID: <4252D0AE.5010708@mail.ru> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:53:50 +0400 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bob@a1poweruser.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: Re: 4.12 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:53:52 -0000 bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > Is there going to be a 4.12 release?? > Not in anyone's plans. I think we could get 4.11.1 though, in case 4.11 is compromised with a very critical security issue. Not very likely in any case. Wishes, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 18:19:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4ED16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:19:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prosporo.hedron.org (hedron.org [66.11.182.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B293443D2F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:19:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ean@hedron.org) Received: from www.hedron.org (localhost.hedron.org [127.0.0.1]) by prosporo.hedron.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E92C12C; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:20:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 216.220.59.169 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ean); by www.hedron.org with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:20:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2713.216.220.59.169.1112725235.squirrel@216.220.59.169> In-Reply-To: <4252B638.5050506@iaces.com> References: <4252B638.5050506@iaces.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:20:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ean Kingston" To: "Paul T. Root" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vinum trouble on 5.3-Stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 18:19:43 -0000 > I upgraded to 5.3 on one system a while ago. And > when it boots up vinum panics the system on startup > with this message: > panic: unmount: dangling vnode > > I found that if I boot in single user mode and > mount / to make it rw, then start vinum, everything > is fine. > > I just patched the kernel for the sendfile bug so > this has come up again. > > Is this an order of execution problem? Do I change when > vinum is started? What the solution. AFAIK the only current solution is to switch to gvinum. There are more details about it in the archive. > I'm happy (apart from this) with 5.x and plan to upgrade > my main server to 5.x. Now that I got a good handle (I > think on bind 9). -- Ean Kingston E-Mail: ean_AT_hedron_DOT_org PGP KeyID: 1024D/CBC5D6BB URL: http://www.hedron.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 18:25:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF35716A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:25:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F4143D60 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:25:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 32179 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2005 18:25:17 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Apr 2005 18:25:17 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3B9232F; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:25:16 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Alex Kapranoff References: <20050405122317.GA22484@capella.park.rambler.ru> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 05 Apr 2005 14:25:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050405122317.GA22484@capella.park.rambler.ru> Message-ID: <44fyy5w06r.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is sshd limiting the rate of successful connections? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 18:25:18 -0000 Alex Kapranoff writes: > It seems that a recent 5-STABLE limits the rate of successful incoming > logins. Is it true? We failed to find the relevant code neither in > openssh nor in openpam. The symptoms are that after a big number of > quick successful logins sshd starts to delay or block login attempts > for as long as 10 seconds. Does someone know anyhting about such > behaviour or is this some obscure configuration problem (read: pilot > error)? You might be hitting the "MaxStartups" limit, but that only applies to connections that haven't yet authenticated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 18:32:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C417116A4D0 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:32:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC7A43D2D for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:32:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1548780rng for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:32:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QdeE65Ul93z8Hk7HjYANgrams/toMlC1PCLh0eZEtDotuU6wLgmd6xIXV+v5qKfWFC+eBpOY3zPj79TxAVUrBJSISqs1Z7s7Yt060DxT68rLvFDBfkZhl2XWc5mCjFDAQDhlSqJUBQxuqXww+8nE/Jm7Kqbp1pzosyImkSc4K8Q= Received: by 10.38.69.34 with SMTP id r34mr952015rna; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:32:49 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: mc superuser X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 18:32:50 -0000 is there a command you can do in mc that gives mc su rights without closing it ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 19:09:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2EE716A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:09:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Gina.esfm.ipn.mx (esfm.ipn.mx [148.204.102.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D514C43D45 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:09:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from Gina.esfm.ipn.mx (localhost.esfm.ipn.mx [127.0.0.1]) by Gina.esfm.ipn.mx (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j35J7dEB021018; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:07:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from localhost (mrspock@localhost)j35J7cei021015; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:07:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) X-Authentication-Warning: Gina.esfm.ipn.mx: mrspock owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:07:38 -0500 (CDT) From: Eduardo Viruena Silva To: =?iso-8859-1?B?Qmr2cm4gS/ZuaWc=?= In-Reply-To: <20050405173032.4BF2012B015@eurystheus.local> Message-ID: <20050405140727.A20815@Gina.esfm.ipn.mx> References: <20050405173032.4BF2012B015@eurystheus.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: shell question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:09:10 -0000 On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Bj=F6rn K=F6nig wrote: > > > > program stdout 2> stderr > > > cat stdout > out > > > a2ps stdout >> out > > You meant > > program stdout 2> stderr > cat stdout > out > a2ps **stderr** >> out > > Don't you? > yes! sorry! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 19:12:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B56916A4CE; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:12:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postino-2.etat.lu (postino-2.etat.lu [194.154.205.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2537543D5D; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:12:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu) Received: from avirus-1.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.6]) by postino-2.etat.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B418911141C1; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:12:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from avirus-1.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.6]) by localhost (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 1) with ESMTP id 983C721318; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:12:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 1) with ESMTP id 85EC72103C; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:12:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEH00HT2MOMT780@store.etat.lu>; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:12:22 +0200 (MEST) Received: from etat.lu ([148.110.136.56]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEH005JPMOMB160@store.etat.lu>; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:12:22 +0200 (MEST) Received: from [192.168.2.43] (Forwarded-For: [158.64.124.154]) by store.etat.lu (mshttpd); Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:12:22 +0200 Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:12:22 +0200 From: Didier Wiroth To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-id: <99f113a61084.4252ff36@etat.lu> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: fr Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: fr Priority: normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: vesa 1024x768 mode in future version? to the freebsd community X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:12:25 -0000 Dear FreeBSD Team, Dear FreeBSD Users, I was wondering if the patches (see link below) have any chances to make their ways into a future release version or may be in the ports collection? Here are the patches I'm talking about: http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/vesa Actually the vidcontrol.diff patch failed for me so I used these patches: http://www.nbritton.org/uploads/current-vesa_patch.tar.gz I'm not a programmer and I can't consider the amount of work or difficulty that these modifications require to the freebsd team to incorporate these changes. I use some older and newer hardware on servers, I don't want to install X and I often had problems getting high resolution modes in consoles (like in linux). Honestly, :-) even if X is installed, high resolution consoles are still nice to have, because 80x25 to 90x60 are nothing compared to a: vidcontrol MODE_279 (1024x768x16) resolution. I had the problem this afternoon while installing freebsd5.4-prerelease (from cvsuping RELENG_5) , 90x60 was the best resolution I could get (without the patch) with my laptop, it has an "ati mobility radeon 9600" graphic. SC_PIXEL_MODE only use 800x600x8 (256 colors, mode=259) which is not supported on ati cards. I assume that there are other vendors too. Reading and googling around showed that there are other users having console resolution problems. They would certainly be glad to have higher console resolutions too, especially migrating linux users. I do admit that the vidcontrol/syscon patches I use from www.nbritton.org...) are bit buggy, mouse cursor, or sluggy screen when going to X. This is not a complain or something similar ... as I reallly, really like freebsd (and openbsd too actually ;-)) and I have enormous respect that you develop it in your free time. I'm only wondering why this isn't integrated, is it useless for you, or to much work (or both) ... If it won't be integrated into a release, do you think it would be possible to put it and maintain it in the ports collection? May be other users think the same? Regards Didier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 19:22:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E6416A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:22:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F7743D41 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:22:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1108.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9D78A1C000A2 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:22:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1108.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 85DAB1C0008E for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:22:06 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050405192206548.85DAB1C0008E@mwinf1108.wanadoo.fr Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:22:06 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <329790613.20050405212206@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <99f113a61084.4252ff36@etat.lu> References: <99f113a61084.4252ff36@etat.lu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: vesa 1024x768 mode in future version? to the freebsd community X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:22:08 -0000 Didier Wiroth writes: > May be other users think the same? I'd definitely like to see text modes with higher resolution. I don't really care about graphics, but I'd like to be able to squeeze more text onto the console. I'd also like a better choice of fonts to improve readability, and a better choice of colors for text and backgrounds. -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 19:37:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7C616A4CE; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:37:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ss.eunet.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8EE43D39; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:37:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) Received: from localhost.i.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13]) by ss.eunet.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j35JbFLi061840; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:37:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) From: Michal Mertl To: Didier Wiroth In-Reply-To: <0IEH00KMJ6U14XA0@store.etat.lu> References: <0IEH00KMJ6U14XA0@store.etat.lu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:37:14 +0200 Message-Id: <1112729834.68302.2.camel@genius2.i.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: delphij@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:37:18 -0000 Didier Wiroth wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using freebsd 5.4-prerelease on my laptop. My laptop has an ati > mobility radeon 9600. > Unfortunately it has very poor console vesa support. SC_PIXEL_MODE does > not work, 90x60 is the highest resolution I can get for now. > It looks like I'm not the only one having this problem with ati > chipsets: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1091839+1096057+/usr/local/w > ww/db/text/2005/freebsd-questions/20050123.freebsd-questions > > > I saw this posting: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-August/035621.ht > ml > > Unfortunately I'm not a programmer and have no ... to very poor patching > skills. > It looks to me, that in this posting(s) a "few" patches are grouped > together to enable vesa 1024x768. > > 1) Has someone applied this patches? > 2) As the patch(es) is/are on the entire page, I don't know how to > separate them. Would someone mail me as an attachment the different > patches and tell me how I should apply them: > for example, mail me patch1, patch2, patch3 > and the explanation how to patch them: > cd /usr/src > patch < ~/patch1 > patch < ~/patch2 ...etc I think the newest and probably best (?) patch was prepared by Xin Li (deplhij@freebsd.org) who is also committer. I sent this email to him (or she? - sorry about that) in case he has some comments. Beware that he said he experienced some problems with previous version of the patch. I haven't tested this version of the patch myself but it at least compiles. It's available at http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/vesa/ in files syscons.diff.20050215 and vidcontrol.diff.20050215 You would apply them with: cd /usr/src/sys/dev/syscons patch < /path/syscons.diff.20050215 cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol patch Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7484216A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:45:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C62743D5C for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:45:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1566304rng for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:45:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=U8v6SX+BIhVoaeFk0FNosv6/Xv2dR9M8NCg2dzU5QplO3hqPteGzI5BRsZemLxh21mtr2KPfzc48pXoOMZYgOKVOG8vTFpqy+8kvqKyZXUgFfHxthbk/qr1pUTCfD3tylLx5XhJvxR6mgVcLxooSGORUVUIb0TLYUjVO4ZS61vI= Received: by 10.38.13.39 with SMTP id 39mr6685519rnm; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:45:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:45:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:45:40 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: Gert Cuykens , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050405145300.GA60490@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050405145300.GA60490@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Subject: Re: printing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:45:41 -0000 Does anybody know if i need to install a extra cups pkg and what the uri is for a windows shared printer ? smb://workgroup/server/sharename ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 19:47:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B3E16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:47:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outcold.yadt.co.uk (outcold.yadt.co.uk [81.187.204.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14AE43D55 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:47:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidt@yadt.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outcold.yadt.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B001DD7E3 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:19:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from outcold.yadt.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (outcold.yadt.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00709-01 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:19:13 +0100 (BST) Received: by outcold.yadt.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9D10E1DD7B5; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:19:13 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:19:13 +0100 From: David Taylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050405151913.GA883@outcold.yadt.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.2.1 (20041222) at yadt.co.uk Subject: MosChip 9805 PCI Parallel Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:47:08 -0000 I'm having trouble trying to get a NM9805 PCI parallel printer port working in 5.4-STABLE. I've got "device lpt" and "device puc" in the kernel. pciconf -lv shows: puc0@pci0:8:0: class=0x078000 card=0x00101000 chip=0x98059710 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'MosChip Semiconductors (Was: Netmos Technology)' device = 'Nm9805 Parallel Port Adapter' class = simple comms dmesg from a verbose boot shows: ... puc0: port 0xd000-0xd00f,0xd400-0xd407,0xd800-0xd807,0xdc00-0xdc07,0xe000-0xe007,0xe400-0xe407 irq 19 at device 8.0 on pci0 ... ppc1: port 0x778-0x77b,0x378-0x37f irq 7 drq 3 on ac pi0 ppc1: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc1: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc1 ppbus0: IEEE1284 device found /NIBBLE/PS2/ECP Probing for PnP devices on ppbus0: ppbus0: PCL,MLC,PML lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port (I already have 1 parallel port, ppc1->ppbus0->lpt0) What's odd is that ppc1 is created -- presumably ppc0 also exists for the add-on port, but for some reason is never mentioned even with boot -v. Any ideas? P.S. I've also got a few mail problems until DNS updates go through, so I'll probably be following this thread through the archives. -- David Taylor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 19:56:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D492216A4CE; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:56:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postino-2.etat.lu (postino-2.etat.lu [194.154.205.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C3D43D58; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:56:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu) Received: from avirus-1.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.6]) by postino-2.etat.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6AF11141AA; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:56:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from avirus-1.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.6]) by localhost (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 1) with ESMTP id 0350F214F9; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:56:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 1) with ESMTP id E61A02103C; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:56:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEH00HAVOQUT790@store.etat.lu>; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:56:55 +0200 (MEST) Received: from etat.lu ([148.110.136.56]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEH005N7OQUB170@store.etat.lu>; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:56:54 +0200 (MEST) Received: from [192.168.2.43] (Forwarded-For: [158.64.124.154]) by store.etat.lu (mshttpd); Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:56:54 +0200 Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:56:54 +0200 From: Didier Wiroth To: Michal Mertl Message-id: <9a3eae2e6edd.425309a6@etat.lu> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: fr Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: fr Priority: normal cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: delphij@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re : Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:56:57 -0000 Hello, Thank you very much for replying. > cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol > patch Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2B916A4CE; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:07:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ss.eunet.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D14E43D39; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:07:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) Received: from localhost.i.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13]) by ss.eunet.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j35K7UGB066257; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:07:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) From: Michal Mertl To: Didier Wiroth In-Reply-To: <9a3eae2e6edd.425309a6@etat.lu> References: <9a3eae2e6edd.425309a6@etat.lu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:07:29 +0200 Message-Id: <1112731649.68302.11.camel@genius2.i.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: delphij@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re : Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 20:07:32 -0000 Didier Wiroth wrote: > Hello, > Thank you very much for replying. > > > cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol > > patch > I'm using the RELENG_5 sources from today. > The syscons.diff.20050215 works but the vidcontrol.diff.20050215 gives > some errors. The diff is against the sources from -CURRENT where it applies and compiles cleanly. You should be ok using the current vidcontrol sources on -STABLE. The only difference is just some code purity fixes by Xin Li - probably in preparation for integrating the changes we speak about. Michal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 20:16:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879D816A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:16:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from galaxy.systems.pipex.net (galaxy.systems.pipex.net [62.241.162.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4D943D5E for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:16:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark.cullen@dsl.pipex.com) Received: from [10.0.0.251] (81-179-228-238.dsl.pipex.com [81.179.228.238]) by galaxy.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9396DE0001CF for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:16:50 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4252FFF1.507@dsl.pipex.com> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:15:29 +0100 From: Mark Cullen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: dhclient oddness? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 20:16:52 -0000 Right, I have this weird annoying issue with my modem which I have finally got around to looking in to. Basically, it's all good and works fine (obviously, otherwise I wouldn't be here!), except when I reboot the internet computer the IP will change, the connection DOESN'T drop, but the IP does change. I have just now narrowed this down to some sort of problem with dhcp I think. The modem has a dhcpd server built in, which sends out the internet IP address to the computers network card. It seems, whenever the dhcp client, dhclient in this case, gets restarted it'll get the old ip address (the first chunk of the quote below, before the ), natd will update itself, but then the connection will just stall until dhclient does the next DHCPREQUEST thing (47 seconds in this case?) .. then the modem sends back a DHCPNAK and I get a different IP address. Any ideas why this might be happening? ------------- Apr 5 17:45:01 bone dhclient: DHCPDISCOVER on fxp1 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 6 Apr 5 17:45:01 bone dhclient: DHCPOFFER from 192.168.0.1 Apr 5 17:45:01 bone dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on fxp1 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 Apr 5 17:45:01 bone dhclient: DHCPACK from 192.168.0.1 Apr 5 17:45:01 bone dhclient: Old IP Address (fxp1): 81.179.214.216 Apr 5 17:45:01 bone dhclient: New IP Address (fxp1): 81.179.214.216 Apr 5 17:45:01 bone dhclient: New Subnet Mask (fxp1): 255.255.255.0 Apr 5 17:45:01 bone dhclient: New Broadcast Address (fxp1): 255.255.255.255 Apr 5 17:45:01 bone dhclient: New Routers: 81.179.214.216 Apr 5 17:45:01 bone dhclient: bound to 81.179.214.216 -- renewal in 47 seconds. Apr 5 17:45:08 bone natd[432]: Aliasing to 81.179.214.216, mtu 1500 bytes Apr 5 17:45:48 bone dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on fxp1 to 192.168.0.1 port 67 Apr 5 17:45:48 bone dhclient: DHCPNAK from 192.168.0.1 Apr 5 17:45:48 bone dhclient: DHCPDISCOVER on fxp1 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 7 Apr 5 17:45:48 bone dhclient: DHCPOFFER from 192.168.0.1 Apr 5 17:45:48 bone dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on fxp1 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 Apr 5 17:45:48 bone dhclient: DHCPACK from 192.168.0.1 Apr 5 17:45:48 bone dhclient: Old IP Address (fxp1): Apr 5 17:45:48 bone dhclient: New IP Address (fxp1): 81.178.94.190 Apr 5 17:45:48 bone dhclient: New Subnet Mask (fxp1): 255.255.255.0 Apr 5 17:45:48 bone dhclient: New Broadcast Address (fxp1): 255.255.255.255 Apr 5 17:45:48 bone dhclient: New Routers: 81.178.94.190 Apr 5 17:45:48 bone dhclient: bound to 81.178.94.190 -- renewal in 53 seconds. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 20:24:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FF116A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:24:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029DD43D3F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:24:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D7360E7; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:24:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42675-01; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:24:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [63.117.97.221]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4566E60D6; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:24:16 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4252F3E0.9000607@makeworld.com> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:24:00 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gert Cuykens References: <20050405145300.GA60490@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 20:24:52 -0000 Gert Cuykens wrote: >Does anybody know if i need to install a extra cups pkg and what the >uri is for a windows shared printer ? > >smb://workgroup/server/sharename ? >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Instead of asking every question here, use resorces like: The handbook, Google man pages cd /usr/ports && make search key=cups | more man cupsd /usr/local/etc/rc.conf cups.sample and finally - SEARCH the questions list on the FBSD site. So far, 8 out of 10 of your questions can be answered on the above. Mostly the FBSD site. You really need to start doing this on your own. Best regards, Chris P.S. Nobody like to spoon feed users when there is info that is easily accessed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 20:28:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E0916A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:28:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.100.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB4943D3F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:28:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j35KSU9S042813 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:28:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200504052028.j35KSU9S042813@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:28:30 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Bourn Shell Scripts that Produce Multiple Files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 20:28:31 -0000 I wrote a Bourn Shell script which has a while loop in it that reads a file line by line. The output of the script is supposed to go to a file with a different name for each iteration of the loop. This scheme is obviously a rotten idea because all the new files end up created, but quite empty. If I take out the > $newfilename.txt directive, I get the proper output at stdout so the only problem is with changing the file name in the middle of the game several times. I think that either the output gets lost in buffers or I am killing the association between the file descriptor that was first opened and all the new files that get created each time the loop runs. bash doesn't have anything like a fflush(); function, does it? I even tried piping the output through cat as in |cat >$newfilename.txt and even |tee $newfilename.txt which sends the output to stdout and to any files you give to tee as arguments. The results are always the same. When I used tee, I could read proper output being sent through stdout, but those files were still as blank as ever. The man page for bash doesn't even contain the word flush nor does it discuss output buffering regarding redirection or "closing" open files. I actually made the script work by splitting it in to two shell scripts which caused the part producing the output to exit each time. That certainly caused output to go to the proper files, but I think there should be a way to make it all happen from one script. Thank you for any suggestions. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK OSU Information Technology Division Network Operations Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 20:47:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E8C16A4CF; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:47:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postino-2.etat.lu (postino-2.etat.lu [194.154.205.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1B443D39; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:47:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu) Received: from avirus-2.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-2.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.7]) by postino-2.etat.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E375C1114121; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:47:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from avirus-2.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-2.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.7]) by localhost (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 2) with ESMTP id E5A77356AA; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:47:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by dispatch-2.cie.etat.lu (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 2) with ESMTP id D212C3567A; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:47:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEH00HSOR2XT790@store.etat.lu>; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:47:22 +0200 (MEST) Received: from etat.lu ([148.110.136.56]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEH005MSR2YB190@store.etat.lu>; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:47:22 +0200 (MEST) Received: from [192.168.2.43] (Forwarded-For: [158.64.124.154]) by store.etat.lu (mshttpd); Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:47:22 +0200 Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:47:22 +0200 From: Didier Wiroth To: Michal Mertl Message-id: <9a93f04267f0.4253157a@etat.lu> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: fr Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: fr Priority: normal cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: delphij@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re : Re: Re : Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 20:47:25 -0000 Unfortunately with patch applied it does not compile on stable: Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol cc -O -pipe -c vidcontrol.c vidcontrol.c: In function `video_mode': vidcontrol.c:500: error: `_VESA_800x600_DFL_COLS' undeclared (first use in this function) vidcontrol.c:500: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once vidcontrol.c:500: error: for each function it appears in.) vidcontrol.c:505: error: `_VESA_800x600_DFL_FNSZ' undeclared (first use in this function) vidcontrol.c:509: error: `_VESA_800x600_DFL_ROWS' undeclared (first use in this function) *** Error code 1 ----- Message d'origine ----- De: Michal Mertl Date: Mardi, Avril 5, 2005 10:07 pm Objet: Re: Re : Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT > Didier Wiroth wrote: > > Hello, > > Thank you very much for replying. > > > > > cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol > > > patch > > > I'm using the RELENG_5 sources from today. > > > The syscons.diff.20050215 works but the vidcontrol.diff.20050215 > gives> some errors. > > The diff is against the sources from -CURRENT where it applies and > compiles cleanly. You should be ok using the current vidcontrol > sourceson -STABLE. The only difference is just some code purity > fixes by Xin Li > - probably in preparation for integrating the changes we speak about. > > Michal > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 21:12:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F3F16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:12:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC9043D45 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:12:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fewjr@adelphia.net) Received: from CTU ([69.174.145.177]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050405211256.MWQF2192.mta9.adelphia.net@CTU>; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:12:56 -0400 Message-ID: <000801c53a24$4a828ab0$030a000a@CTU> From: "Francis Whittington" To: References: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:13:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter.log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:12:58 -0000 Hi again Bob, I read the ipfilter section of the Official manual for 5.3. Where it talks about adding that line to syslog.conf, (local0.* /var/log/ipfilter.log), well it says to put local0.*. It doesn't mention putting security.*, although it did work for me. I looked through the errata section online and didn't see anything about it there either. At the same time I see that in my syslog.conf file there is already a line that uses security.* /var/log/security. Am I using two logs for the same thing? fewjr/Buddy ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Francis Whittington" ; Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:29 PM Subject: RE: ipfilter.log > The answer is very simple. The integration of the open source > ipfilter firewall into FreeBSD has changed between the 4.x releases > and the 5.3 release just made available. If you change the > syslog.conf: > > Local0.* /var/log/ipfilter.log which is how 4.10 > & 4.11 work > > To > > security.* /var/log/ipfilter.log for 5.3 then every > thing will work as documented. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Francis > Whittington > Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 9:29 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: ipfilter.log > > Hi guys, > I've been following this guide: > http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php > So far I have gotten the firewall/router to work. Everything seems > to be okay, except I do not see anything being logged in > ipfilter.log. > I am using ipf.rules and ipnat.rules. I created ipfilter.log in > /var/log/ and I added this line to syslog.conf: > Local0.* /var/log/ipfilter.log > and I added the following line to newsyslog.conf for rotating the > log. > /var/log/ipfilter.log 600 5 100 $M1D0 J > I was wondering if anyone could tell me why I do not get anything in > my ipfilter.log. > > Thanks > fewjr/Buddy > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 21:21:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F92316A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:21:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.extensivetechnologies.com (mail.extensivetechnologies.com [207.59.112.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D624743D54 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:21:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@elhombre.us) Received: from [192.168.1.117] ([192.168.1.117]) by mail.extensivetechnologies.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:21:34 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) In-Reply-To: <20050405173450.01D3916A4DC@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20050405173450.01D3916A4DC@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <595aee4d9b8e85e98d8081938c0955d4@elhombre.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dustin Wilhoit Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:21:34 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Apr 2005 21:21:34.0224 (UTC) FILETIME=[717E7100:01C53A25] Subject: Geom_gbde and Hardware Crypto Accelerators X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:21:35 -0000 After searching google and the archives I wasn't able to find any current information on the status of hardware cryptographic accelerators (like the Soekris vpn1401) and gbde. Can gbde harness the power of one of these accelerator cards yet? If so do they provide significant offloading from the processor(s)? Any comments on the Soekris vpn1401 card I've been thinking about? Thanks in advance. Dustin Wilhoit lists@elhombre.us From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 21:45:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16A116A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:45:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20F743D4C for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:45:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050405214500.RNFM5402.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:45:00 -0400 From: To: "Francis Whittington" Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:45:00 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <000801c53a24$4a828ab0$030a000a@CTU> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ipfilter.log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:45:03 -0000 I wrote the official handbook firewall section based on 4.10 release before ipfilter was incorporated into the base of 5.3. You are incorrect to think that what you read in the official handbook is for 5.3 only. I have submitted a change to the handbook to correct it saying that 5.3 uses security.* ipfw also uses security.* that way there are no changes necessary to syslog.conf no mater which firewall you use. -----Original Message----- From: Francis Whittington [mailto:fewjr@adelphia.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 5:13 PM To: bob@a1poweruser.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter.log Hi again Bob, I read the ipfilter section of the Official manual for 5.3. Where it talks about adding that line to syslog.conf, (local0.* /var/log/ipfilter.log), well it says to put local0.*. It doesn't mention putting security.*, although it did work for me. I looked through the errata section online and didn't see anything about it there either. At the same time I see that in my syslog.conf file there is already a line that uses security.* /var/log/security. Am I using two logs for the same thing? fewjr/Buddy ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Francis Whittington" ; Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:29 PM Subject: RE: ipfilter.log > The answer is very simple. The integration of the open source > ipfilter firewall into FreeBSD has changed between the 4.x releases > and the 5.3 release just made available. If you change the > syslog.conf: > > Local0.* /var/log/ipfilter.log which is how 4.10 > & 4.11 work > > To > > security.* /var/log/ipfilter.log for 5.3 then every > thing will work as documented. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Francis > Whittington > Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 9:29 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: ipfilter.log > > Hi guys, > I've been following this guide: > http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php > So far I have gotten the firewall/router to work. Everything seems > to be okay, except I do not see anything being logged in > ipfilter.log. > I am using ipf.rules and ipnat.rules. I created ipfilter.log in > /var/log/ and I added this line to syslog.conf: > Local0.* /var/log/ipfilter.log > and I added the following line to newsyslog.conf for rotating the > log. > /var/log/ipfilter.log 600 5 100 $M1D0 J > I was wondering if anyone could tell me why I do not get anything in > my ipfilter.log. > > Thanks > fewjr/Buddy > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 21:59:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CF216A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:59:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.nativenerds.com (host-70-0-111-24.midco.net [24.111.0.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9B943D55 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:59:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from estover@nativenerds.com) Received: from red (host-14-37-230-24.midco.net [24.230.37.14]) j35MCAxX098909; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:12:11 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from estover@nativenerds.com) From: Ed Stover To: Christopher Lane , questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4252A251.2060408@inteliport.com> References: <4252A251.2060408@inteliport.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Native Nerds Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:59:48 -0600 Message-Id: <1112738388.3137.13.camel@red.nativenerds.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail.nativenerds.com Subject: Re: question about mysql-server.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: estover@nativenerds.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:59:49 -0000 rcsubr is the culprit, when you added the line in the rc.conf then all was well. You can add a line in the rc.conf and then run the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server.sh start command with out having to reboot. Personally I really dislike rcsubr, makes me think that FreeBSD is drifting toward linux's overly comlexness... a script to start a script that starts a script that starts a script, blah blah blah.... On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 10:36 -0400, Christopher Lane wrote: > Hi, > > Long story made short: The mysql-server.sh that came with > mysql-server-4.1.10a (installed from cvsup'ed ports) wouldn't work until > after I rebooted the server. It's working now, so I know I shouldn't > complain, but anyone know what happened? > > Long story: > 1. Minimum installation, added ports distribution, cvsup to latest ports. > 2. cd /usr/ports/mysql41-server; make install > 3. '/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server.sh start' does nothing. > 4. I noticed that rc_subr wasn't installed, even though freshports says > it is required. So I installed rc_subr from ports, but still no love. > 5. I put mysql_enable="YES" in rc.conf (since I would soon want it there > anyway) and restarted the server. > 6. mysql-server.sh works like a charm now. > > Thanks in advance to anyone who can help shine some light on what might > have changed that made mysql-server.sh work. > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 22:05:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2418B16A4CF for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:05:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4594C43D1F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:05:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so15925rng for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:05:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=M0FzKTagMdWTPyT695AGccOqaVALVXaSsBnWzgAPS9l0WgT6WsGtQAtsb5YQUhdBZ8RkzAiE0UuzdlGpn3Ja4G3nxzF+/WMEdYBfrDjjls6RBStWt8oBxPB1n3enK4ymy22SgB1RGgL+CMt/u/gJji8asIgO6J4psqkFlx57wWs= Received: by 10.38.155.3 with SMTP id c3mr124089rne; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.13.78 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:05:40 +0000 From: Pietro Cerutti To: Kevin Kinsey In-Reply-To: <4252CA5C.9040706@daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <3rr04b$oie03j@mxip02a.cluster1.charter.net> <4252CA5C.9040706@daleco.biz> cc: John Hall cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PRERELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pietro Cerutti List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:05:42 -0000 On Apr 5, 2005 5:26 PM, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > John Hall wrote: > > >We currently have 5.4-PRERELEASE installed on our web box: > > > >outpost# uname -a > >FreeBSD outpost.blacklotus.net 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Wed > >Mar 30 13:38:38 MST 2005 > >hallj@outpost.blacklotus.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/OUTPOST i386 > > > >I need to know if we need to update the server to 5.4-RELEASE with this > >version of 5.4 in order to protect against the sendfile kernel memory > >problem in the security notice at: > > > >ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:02.sendfile. > >asc > > > >Thanks! > > > >John Hall [jhall@lotuscom.net] > >Manager of Operations > >Black Lotus Communications > >[http://www.blacklotus.net] > > > > > > I don't think it's possible to update to 5.4-RELEASE, as it > doesn't exist yet AFAICT from the web site. I've not checked > the CVS repo or mirrors, so I guess it's possible that it has > been tagged in the last couple of days, though. Yes it's on the CVSs repositories now.... > > Updating to any codebase from today or following the > patch method outlined in the announcement should > make you safe from this vulnerability. > > See the Handbook chapter on "the Cutting Edge". > The RELEASE tag you'd want would be "RELENG_5", > I expect. > > Whoops, OK: now I see that apparently 5.4 has > been tagged. As mentioned in the advisory, you > can either patch your system and recompile the > kernel or update to one of seven different code > paths to get the new code. If you server was built > just a week ago, then 5.4-RELEASE sounds great > for this purpose, and the only viable choices for you > are RELENG_5, RELENG_5_4, or RELENG_5_3. > However, the recommended procedure for the > entire world reinstall includes some time (not > much, probably) spent in single-user mode, so if this > is a busy box that needs 99.99 percent uptime, maybe > the kernel rebuild would be better, as a simple reboot > on the new kernel would be the only thing required.... > I'm sure that this statement might be open to debate.... > > Kevin Kinsey > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Pietro Cerutti Beansidhe - SwiSS Death / Thrash Metal Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming or what?" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 22:09:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5779016A4FC for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:09:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.nativenerds.com (host-70-0-111-24.midco.net [24.111.0.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA74643D55 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:09:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from estover@nativenerds.com) Received: from red (host-14-37-230-24.midco.net [24.230.37.14]) j35MLkIc098965; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:21:47 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from estover@nativenerds.com) From: Ed Stover To: Gareth Bailey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <48a5f32a050405031350803bb2@mail.gmail.com> References: <48a5f32a050405031350803bb2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Native Nerds Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:09:24 -0600 Message-Id: <1112738964.3137.21.camel@red.nativenerds.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail.nativenerds.com Subject: Re: Copying files off Samba Server - freezes/very slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: estover@nativenerds.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:09:23 -0000 Let us take a look at you smbd.conf, that might help. On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 12:13 +0200, Gareth Bailey wrote: > I have just upgraded the hardware of our development server. I thought > that our file server used to be slow due to slow hardware, but now > that we have upgraded I am a bit puzzled. > > Samba seems to slow or hang (top reports smbd CPU usage as 40%) when > files are copied off the server using windows explorer on the client. > > Can anyone sugeest a reason for this behaviour? > > Thanks, > Gareth > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 22:18:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F0D16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:18:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A9543D1F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:18:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j35MIC6O024419; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:18:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:18:12 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Ed Stover Message-ID: <20050405221811.GF64927@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4252A251.2060408@inteliport.com> <1112738388.3137.13.camel@red.nativenerds.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1112738388.3137.13.camel@red.nativenerds.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: Christopher Lane cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question about mysql-server.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:18:18 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 05), Ed Stover said: > rcsubr is the culprit, when you added the line in the rc.conf then > all was well. You can add a line in the rc.conf and then run the > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server.sh start command with out having to > reboot. Personally I really dislike rcsubr, makes me think that > FreeBSD is drifting toward linux's overly comlexness... a script to > start a script that starts a script that starts a script, blah blah > blah.... On the plus side, a porter now can install a 10-line startup script that handles start/stop/restart/status cleanly, and the user can enable or disable the script, or modify options without editing the startup script itself and having their local changes blown away the next time they update the port. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 22:26:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DA216A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:26:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arbornet.org (m-net.arbornet.org [64.9.205.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2EB43D54 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:26:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from caleb@m-net.arbornet.org) Received: from m-net.arbornet.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arbornet.org (8.12.3p2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id j35MTFYg007142 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:29:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from caleb@m-net.arbornet.org) Received: from localhost (caleb@localhost)j35MTEdv007137 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:29:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:29:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Brett Wiggins To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050405180927.D4470-100000@m-net.arbornet.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: ftp problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:26:59 -0000 Hi all, I am having some problems using the freebsd ftp program. when I type; ftp username.customer.netspace.net.au password I get the following message; servname not supported for ai_socktype Am I using the right syntax? When I consulted the ftp server support page it said; "Once you have your ftp Client installed, you will need to use the following settings to connect to your personal webspace (lets assume your username is test and your password is webpage): hostname : test.customer.netspace.net.au username : test password : webpage Also ensure that if your FTP Client gives you the option to use "PASV" mode, that this is selected. All you need to do at this point is upload the files to the site and away you go". Any help would be appreciated. If you reply could you please CC me because I am not subscribed to the list. Thanks for your time, Brett ============================================= "True knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing. And in knowing that you know nothing, that makes you the smartest of all" - Socrates ============================================ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 22:28:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C02316A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:28:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.nativenerds.com (host-70-0-111-24.midco.net [24.111.0.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B73243D58 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:28:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from estover@nativenerds.com) Received: from red (host-14-37-230-24.midco.net [24.230.37.14]) j35Meujn099066 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:40:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from estover@nativenerds.com) From: Ed Stover To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <791630627.20050403134246@wanadoo.fr> References: <20050403094458.9267.qmail@web51107.mail.yahoo.com> <791630627.20050403134246@wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Native Nerds Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:28:34 -0600 Message-Id: <1112740114.3137.25.camel@red.nativenerds.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail.nativenerds.com Subject: Re: Hyperthreading not working on my 5.3 FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: estover@nativenerds.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:28:33 -0000 don't you need apic as well ? device apic # I/O APIC On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 13:42 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > faisal gillani writes: > > > Well the output of my dmesg command is only showing 1 > > processor , HT is enabled in bios , & working on > > windows XP on the same PC. > > what can be wrong ? is there anyway to enable it ? > > Recompile the kernel with > > options SMP > > You should then see the second logical processor come online with no > problems after installing the new kernel and rebooting. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 22:30:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9790816A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:30:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C89A43D46 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:30:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j35MU49d051650; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:30:04 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:30:04 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Brett Wiggins Message-ID: <20050405223004.GG64927@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20050405180927.D4470-100000@m-net.arbornet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050405180927.D4470-100000@m-net.arbornet.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftp problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:30:05 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 05), Brett Wiggins said: > Hi all, > I am having some problems using the freebsd ftp program. > when I type; > ftp username.customer.netspace.net.au password > I get the following message; > servname not supported for ai_socktype Just run "ftp username.customer.netspace.net.au", then enter your username and password at the prompts. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 22:42:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3032216A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:42:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pobox.webstakez.com (pobox.webstakez.com [24.75.44.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6865143D45 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:42:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ababurko@adelphia.net) Received: (qmail 18035 invoked by uid 1014); 5 Apr 2005 22:44:06 -0000 Received: from 24.52.231.152 by pobox.webstakez.com (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.24 (clamdscan: 0.83/761. spamassassin: 2.64. perlscan: 1.24. Clear:RC:0(24.52.231.152):SA:0(-0.5/5.0):. Processed in 2.222076 secs); 05 Apr 2005 22:44:06 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: ababurko@adelphia.net via pobox.webstakez.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.24 (Clear:RC:0(24.52.231.152):SA:0(-0.5/5.0):. Processed in 2.222076 secs) Received: from 24-52-231-152.kntnny.adelphia.net (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (bob@phreakout.net@24.52.231.152) by pobox.webstakez.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2005 22:44:04 -0000 Message-ID: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 18:42:08 -0400 From: Bob Ababurko User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: suspending login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:42:19 -0000 Hello all- I am trying to figure out how to suspend a login for a user. Do I have to do this with password aging or is there an easier(read brute force) way to disallow a user from logging in? -thanks, Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 22:48:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDE716A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:48:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91.asp.att.net [204.127.203.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF92543D39 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:48:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from twinmp (12-218-21-193.client.mchsi.com[12.218.21.193]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with ESMTP id <20050405224906m9100puvqie>; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:49:06 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:48:54 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> In-Reply-To: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504051748.54846.josh@tcbug.org> cc: Bob Ababurko Subject: Re: suspending login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:48:57 -0000 On Tuesday 05 April 2005 17:42, Bob Ababurko wrote: > Hello all- > > I am trying to figure out how to suspend a login for a user. Do I > have to do this with password aging or is there an easier(read > brute force) way to disallow a user from logging in? > > -thanks, > Bob > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Will setting their shell to /sbin/nologin do what you want? -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 22:49:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB70E16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:49:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3376943D3F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:49:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:10091 helo=mail.aseed.antenna.nl) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DIwr8-000Bwm-AL; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:49:10 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by mail.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735872841A7; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:50:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (f80052.upc-f.chello.nl [80.56.80.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CCF58C829; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:49:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:49:08 +0200 From: "albi@scii.nl" To: Bob Ababurko Message-Id: <20050406004908.01af6edb.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> References: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suspending login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:49:11 -0000 On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 18:42:08 -0400 Bob Ababurko wrote: hi, > I am trying to figure out how to suspend a login for a user. Do I > have to do this with password aging or is there an easier(read brute > force) way to disallow a user from logging in? do you want to directly disable a login for a certain user ? - become root (or use sudo) - with vipw replace the password-bit by a * as you can here e.g. : _pflogd:*:64:64::0:0:pflogd privsep user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin pop:*:68:6::0:0:Post Office Owner:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin ^^^^^^^ the password-part is between the first and second colon if you want to use your favorite editor (e.g. nano) instead of vi with vipw, do the following before starting vipw, assuming bash is your default shell : export EDITOR=nano From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 22:49:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B746616A4CE; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:49:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prosporo.hedron.org (hedron.org [66.11.182.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4654743D31; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:49:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ean@hedron.org) Received: from localhost.hedron.org (localhost.hedron.org [127.0.0.1]) by prosporo.hedron.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93708C132; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:50:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Ean Kingston To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:50:32 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> In-Reply-To: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504051850.33281.ean@hedron.org> cc: Bob Ababurko cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suspending login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:49:40 -0000 On April 5, 2005 06:42 pm, Bob Ababurko wrote: > Hello all- > > I am trying to figure out how to suspend a login for a user. Do I have > to do this with password aging or is there an easier(read brute force) > way to disallow a user from logging in? the safest way is to set the shell to /sbin/nologin and the home directory to /nonexistant in your auth system. The latter is especially needed if you allow ssh for remote login since the public-key authentication mechanisms sometimes bypass the normal login restrictions. -- Ean Kingston E-Mail: ean AT hedron DOT org URL: http://www.hedron.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 22:49:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B746616A4CE; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:49:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prosporo.hedron.org (hedron.org [66.11.182.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4654743D31; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:49:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ean@hedron.org) Received: from localhost.hedron.org (localhost.hedron.org [127.0.0.1]) by prosporo.hedron.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93708C132; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:50:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Ean Kingston To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:50:32 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> In-Reply-To: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504051850.33281.ean@hedron.org> cc: Bob Ababurko cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suspending login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:49:40 -0000 On April 5, 2005 06:42 pm, Bob Ababurko wrote: > Hello all- > > I am trying to figure out how to suspend a login for a user. Do I have > to do this with password aging or is there an easier(read brute force) > way to disallow a user from logging in? the safest way is to set the shell to /sbin/nologin and the home directory to /nonexistant in your auth system. The latter is especially needed if you allow ssh for remote login since the public-key authentication mechanisms sometimes bypass the normal login restrictions. -- Ean Kingston E-Mail: ean AT hedron DOT org URL: http://www.hedron.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 22:59:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4701C16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:59:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF62F43D4C for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:58:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from randyprimeaux@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so24881rng for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:58:59 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KS6d/R/IL43Eidb3m71DpoL59LaLl9ShbatETrfkMutFBM/poGcvQhr+p2xsMIk06HlDOf826oAO9ZJrG7n2rtFd8AQ+gKRjnHbKz1RvjIYyohLhtIP4u5PYC4mKBI4sXWpDEDVsC4o8UnN7580oyqOIfD4sGY8xmYTaJ1UmzjE= Received: by 10.38.6.79 with SMTP id 79mr165246rnf; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.98.33 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54b47b8a0504051558753de5d8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:58:58 -0700 From: Randy Primeaux To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: drm/dri/glxinfo on 6-current & xorg 6.8.2 with radeon 9200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Randy Primeaux List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:59:00 -0000 Hi, I'm having trouble getting DRI direct rendering enabled. I had it enabled in October, however since then I've upgraded everything but my video card. The earliest point where I can find a failure report is in Xorg.0.log: (EE) RADEON(0): [drm] Failed to map vertex/indirect buffers list The only references I've been able to find (via Google) to the above error is in the source files. I'm wondering if it's DMA related? (just a shot in the dark) Hardware is ASUS K8V-X, ATI Radeon 9200 5961 (AGP). Software is FreeBSD 6-current, xorg 6.8.2, dri 6.2.1 (both from ports) Files: http://www.cloudfactory.org/~randy/radeon/dmesg.boot http://www.cloudfactory.org/~randy/radeon/xorg.conf http://www.cloudfactory.org/~randy/radeon/Xorg.0.log http://www.cloudfactory.org/~randy/radeon/glxinfo.txt (for comparison) http://www.cloudfactory.org/~randy/radeon/XFree86.0.log In xorg.conf, I've tested with xorg drivers ati and radeon, and I've got Section "Module", Load "dri", Load "glx", and Section "DRI", Mode 0666 dmesg indicates: agp0: mem 0xe0000000-0xefffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 drm0: port 0xa000-0xa0ff mem 0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff,0xfc200000-0xfc20ffff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci1 info: [drm] AGP at 0xe0000000 256MB info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.11.0 20020828 on minor 0 info: [drm] Loading R200 Microcode other devices share irq 11: pci_link0: irq 11 on acpi0 uhci0: port 0xb800-0xb81f irq 11 at device 16.0 on pci0 uhci1: port 0xc000-0xc01f irq 11 at device 16.1 on pci0 Section I think is relevant from Xorg.0.log: (II) RADEON(0): X context handle = 0x00000001 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] installed DRM signal handler (II) RADEON(0): [DRI] installation complete (II) RADEON(0): [drm] Added 32 65536 byte vertex/indirect buffers (EE) RADEON(0): [drm] Failed to map vertex/indirect buffers list (II) RADEON(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel (II) RADEON(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xc2c7c000 at 0x283d0000 (II) RADEON(0): Render acceleration enabled (II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering disabled I've fiddled with the BIOS a bit, and I moved my 3ware RAID and SCSI cards over a slot to reduce IRQ sharing with the Radeon. One thing I haven't tried yet is compiling a new kernel without USB support, or giving device.hints for USB to use different IRQ. I've also considered hinting at specific DMA, but haven't tried that yet. I've tried the troubleshooting listed at http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/DriTroubleshooting and http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/troubleshooting.html -- Randy Primeaux http://cloudfactory.org/~randy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 23:06:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656AF16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:06:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51D1543D39 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:06:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@MHoerich.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Apr 2005 23:06:09 -0000 Received: from pD9E582EF.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO localhost) [217.229.130.239] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 06 Apr 2005 01:06:09 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5114400 Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 01:06:06 +0200 From: Mario Hoerich To: Martin McCormick Message-ID: <20050405230605.GA93190@Pandora.MHoerich.de> References: <200504052028.j35KSU9S042813@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504052028.j35KSU9S042813@dc.cis.okstate.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bourn Shell Scripts that Produce Multiple Files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 23:06:12 -0000 # Martin McCormick: > I wrote a Bourn Shell script which has a while loop in it that > reads a file line by line. The output of the script is supposed to go > to a file with a different name for each iteration of the loop. This > scheme is obviously a rotten idea because all the new files end up > created, but quite empty. If I take out the > $newfilename.txt > directive, I get the proper output at stdout so the only problem is > with changing the file name in the middle of the game several times. This sounds a bit like a truncation issue. If you do something like command1 > bar # some code command2 > bar then the second redirect will truncate the file to 0 bytes before redirecting the output from command2 into it. Try using >> instead of >, as it appends to the file. If this doesn't help, please post the script (or a simplified version thereof). We're not clairvoyant, you know... :) HTH, Mario From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 23:11:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6853C16A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:11:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ss.eunet.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBF143D2F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:11:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) Received: from localhost.i.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13]) by ss.eunet.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j35NBlOg093280; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 01:11:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) From: Michal Mertl To: Randy Primeaux In-Reply-To: <54b47b8a0504051558753de5d8@mail.gmail.com> References: <54b47b8a0504051558753de5d8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:11:47 +0200 Message-Id: <1112742707.1257.4.camel@genius2.i.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: drm/dri/glxinfo on 6-current & xorg 6.8.2 with radeon 9200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 23:11:50 -0000 Randy Primeaux wrote: > Hi, > I'm having trouble getting DRI direct rendering enabled. I had it enabled > in October, however since then I've upgraded everything but my video > card. > > The earliest point where I can find a failure report is in Xorg.0.log: > (EE) RADEON(0): [drm] Failed to map vertex/indirect buffers list I believe the problem was caused by a major changes in the tree and a bug in DRM which was exposed by them. DRM was crippled on Feb 22. It was fixed on Apr 10. Try with newer CURRENT and I believe it will work for you again. You really only need a new kernel. HTH Michal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 23:18:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4FB16A4CE; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:18:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ss.eunet.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D00A43D46; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:18:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) Received: from localhost.i.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13]) by ss.eunet.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j35NILZe094200; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 01:18:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) From: Michal Mertl To: Didier Wiroth In-Reply-To: <9a93f04267f0.4253157a@etat.lu> References: <9a93f04267f0.4253157a@etat.lu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:18:20 +0200 Message-Id: <1112743101.1257.11.camel@genius2.i.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: delphij@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 23:18:23 -0000 Didier Wiroth wrote: > Unfortunately with patch applied it does not compile on stable: > > Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol > cc -O -pipe -c vidcontrol.c > vidcontrol.c: In function `video_mode': > vidcontrol.c:500: error: `_VESA_800x600_DFL_COLS' undeclared (first use in this > function) > vidcontrol.c:500: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > vidcontrol.c:500: error: for each function it appears in.) > vidcontrol.c:505: error: `_VESA_800x600_DFL_FNSZ' undeclared (first use in this > function) > vidcontrol.c:509: error: `_VESA_800x600_DFL_ROWS' undeclared (first use in this > function) > *** Error code 1 I believe Didier used broken vidcontrol.c file. The patch was for current and needs to be applied to clean vidcontrol.c ver 1.48. It works for me (on CURRENT anyways). Michal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 23:20:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37B216A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:20:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pobox.webstakez.com (pobox.webstakez.com [24.75.44.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED9A343D1F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:20:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ababurko@adelphia.net) Received: (qmail 18989 invoked by uid 1014); 5 Apr 2005 23:22:38 -0000 Received: from 24.52.231.152 by pobox.webstakez.com (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.24 (clamdscan: 0.83/761. spamassassin: 2.64. perlscan: 1.24. Clear:RC:0(24.52.231.152):SA:0(-0.5/5.0):. Processed in 2.414537 secs); 05 Apr 2005 23:22:38 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: ababurko@adelphia.net via pobox.webstakez.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.24 (Clear:RC:0(24.52.231.152):SA:0(-0.5/5.0):. Processed in 2.414537 secs) Received: from 24-52-231-152.kntnny.adelphia.net (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (bob@phreakout.net@24.52.231.152) by pobox.webstakez.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2005 23:22:35 -0000 Message-ID: <42531D48.4080506@adelphia.net> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:20:40 -0400 From: Bob Ababurko User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ean Kingston References: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> <200504051850.33281.ean@hedron.org> In-Reply-To: <200504051850.33281.ean@hedron.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suspending login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 23:20:49 -0000 Ean Kingston wrote: > On April 5, 2005 06:42 pm, Bob Ababurko wrote: > >>Hello all- >> >>I am trying to figure out how to suspend a login for a user. Do I have >>to do this with password aging or is there an easier(read brute force) >>way to disallow a user from logging in? > > > the safest way is to set the shell to /sbin/nologin and the home directory > to /nonexistant in your auth system. The latter is especially needed if you > allow ssh for remote login since the public-key authentication mechanisms > sometimes bypass the normal login restrictions. > That is perfect...just what I was trying to do. I am used to solaris... where if my memory serves me, can lock a user account using the -l flag with the passwd command or comment them out in the passwd file. I still like freebsd way more though. thanks, Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 00:21:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A3316A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:21:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731F643D58 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:21:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silverback011@yahoo.com) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (pcp651620pcs.bbridg01.fl.comcast.net[68.35.239.55]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005040600213301200k3b23e>; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:21:33 +0000 From: Chuck Teal Organization: Personal To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:22:06 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504052022.06405.silverback011@yahoo.com> Subject: Unusual dmesg output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:21:36 -0000 I saw this roll by the screen on bootup. It came up 2X during the boot up process. What does it mean? It is something to be worried about? I have not noticed any problems with my system. It just bothers me not knowing what this is about. Here is a portion of the output. 534 numposzaps R *Handler 535 numposhits R *Handler 536 numnegzaps R *Handler 537 numneghits R *Handler 538 nchstats R *Handler Opaque/struct 543 numcwdcalls R *Handler 544 numcwdfail1 R *Handler 545 numcwdfail2 R *Handler 546 numcwdfail3 R *Handler 547 numcwdfail4 R *Handler 548 numcwdfound R *Handler 550 numfullpathcalls R *Handler 551 numfullpathfail1 R *Handler 552 numfullpathfail2 R *Handler 553 numfullpathfail3 R *Handler 554 numfullpathfail4 R *Handler 555 numfullpathfound R *Handler 556 write_behind RW *Handler Int 557 read_max RW *Handler Int 558 opv_numops R *Handler Int 559 usermount RW *Handler Int 561 numvnodes R *Handler 562 wantfreevnodes RW *Handler 563 freevnodes R *Handler 564 reassignbufcalls RW *Handler Int 565 nameileafonly RW *Handler Int 572 timestamp_precision RW *Handler Int 573 worklist_len R *Handler Int 574 conflist R *Handler 575 ctl W *Handler 685 ffs RW Node 1 adjrefcnt W *Handler Opaque/struct 2 adjblkcnt W *Handler Node 3 freeblks W *Handler Node 4 freedirs W *Handler Node 5 freefiles W *Handler Node 6 setflags W *Handler Node 686 doasyncfree RW *Handler Int 687 doreallocblks RW *Handler Int 4 net RW Node 1 local RW Node 1 stream RW Node 483 sendspace RW *Handler Int 484 recvspace RW *Handler Int 489 pcblist R *Handler 2 dgram RW Node 485 maxdgram RW *Handler Int 486 recvspace RW *Handler Int 488 pcblist R *Handler 487 inflight R *Handler Int 2 inet RW Node 0 ip RW Node 0 portrange RW Node 605 lowfirst RW *Handler Int 606 lowlast RW *Handler Int 607 first RW *Handler Int 608 last RW *Handler Int 609 hifirst RW *Handler Int 610 hilast RW *Handler Int 611 reservedhigh RW *Handler Int 612 reservedlow RW *Handler Int 613 randomized RW *Handler Int 1 forwarding RW *Handler Int 2 redirect RW *Handler Int 3 ttl RW *Handler Int 5 rtexpire RW *Handler Int 6 rtminexpire RW *Handler Int 7 rtmaxcache RW *Handler Int 8 sourceroute RW *Handler Int 10 intr_queue_maxlen RW *Handler Int 11 intr_queue_drops R *Handler Int 12 stats RW *Handler Opaque/struct 13 accept_sourceroute RW *Handler Int 15 keepfaith RW *Handler Int 16 gifttl RW *Handler Int 604 subnets_are_local RW *Handler Int 614 fastforwarding RW *Handler Int 621 process_options RW *Handler Int 622 maxfragpackets RW *Handler Int 623 maxfragsperpacket RW *Handler Int 624 sendsourcequench RW *Handler Int 625 random_id RW *Handler Int 626 check_interface RW *Handler Int 1 icmp RW Node 1 maskrepl RW *Handler Int 2 stats RW *Handler Opaque/struct 3 icmplim RW *Handler Int 615 maskfake RW *Handler 616 drop_redirect RW *Handler Int 617 log_redirect RW *Handler Int 618 icmplim_output RW *Handler Int 619 reply_src RW *Handler String 620 bmcastecho RW *Handler Int 2 igmp RW Node 1 stats RW *Handler Opaque/struct 6 tcp RW Node 1 rfc1323 RW *Handler Int 2 rfc1644 RW *Handler Int 3 mssdflt RW *Handler Int 4 stats RW *Handler Opaque/struct 6 keepidle RW *Handler Int 7 keepintvl RW *Handler Int 8 sendspace RW *Handler Int 9 recvspace RW *Handler Int 10 keepinit RW *Handler Int 11 pcblist R *Handler 12 delacktime RW *Handler Int 13 v6mssdflt RW *Handler Int 630 hostcache RW Node 631 cachelimit R *Handler Int 632 hashsize R *Handler Int 633 bucketlimit R *Handler Int 634 count R *Handler Int 635 expire RW *Handler Int 636 purge RW *Handler Int 637 list R *Handler String 638 log_in_vain RW *Handler Int 639 blackhole RW *Handler Int 640 delayed_ack RW *Handler Int 641 rfc3042 RW *Handler Int 642 rfc3390 RW *Handler Int 643 reass RW Node 644 maxsegments R *Handler Int 645 cursegments R *Handler Int 646 maxqlen RW *Handler Int 647 overflows R *Handler Int 648 path_mtu_discovery RW *Handler Int 649 slowstart_flightsize RW *Handler Int 650 local_slowstart_flightsize RW *Handler Int 651 newreno RW *Handler Int 652 minmss RW *Handler Int 653 minmssoverload RW *Handler Int 654 tcbhashsize R *Handler Int 655 do_tcpdrain RW *Handler Int 656 pcbcount R *Handler Int 657 icmp_may_rst RW *Handler Int 658 isn_reseed_interval RW *Handler Int 659 inflight RW Node From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 00:50:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D2116A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:50:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A2D43D5D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:50:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fewjr@adelphia.net) Received: from CTU ([69.174.145.177]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050406005010.CNZA4618.mta13.adelphia.net@CTU> for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:50:10 -0400 Message-ID: <001501c53a42$a3d58860$030a000a@CTU> From: "Francis Whittington" To: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:50:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: ipf.rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:50:12 -0000 Hi all, In ipf.rules at the section below it says to run 1st rule, then look = for ip address, put it in commented out rule and delete 1st rule . How = do I know what ip address is my isp's DHCP server address? > # Allow out access to my ISP's DHCP server for cable or DSL networks. # This rule is not needed for 'user ppp' type connection to the=20 # public Internet, so you can delete this whole group. # Use the following rule and check log for IP address.=20 # Then put IP address in commented out rule & delete first rule=20 pass out log quick on dc0 proto udp from any to any port =3D 67 keep = state #pass out quick on dc0 proto udp from any to z.z.z.z port =3D 67 keep = state From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 00:52:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A917116A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:52:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from simmts6-srv.bellnexxia.net (simmts6.bellnexxia.net [206.47.199.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596E943D53 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:52:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@interpool.ca) Received: from interpool.homeunix.com ([65.95.49.39]) by simmts6-srv.bellnexxia.netSMTP <20050406005226.LIIV1597.simmts6-srv.bellnexxia.net@interpool.homeunix.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:52:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:52:36 -0400 From: Gerry Freymann To: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <20050405205236.7f7102e8.lists@interpool.ca> In-Reply-To: <20050405174450.GB86957@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050405174450.GB86957@xor.obsecurity.org> Organization: Interpool Development www.interpool.ca X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: bob@a1poweruser.com cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.12 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:52:28 -0000 On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:44:50 -0700 Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:41:47PM -0400, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: >> Is there going to be a 4.12 release?? > >No. So... if I've read things correctly, we are now moving to FreeBSD 5 Release? And the ports will be updated for use with FBSD 5? (at least, if you want to keep up to date?) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 01:11:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E56C16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 01:11:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lon-mail-3.gradwell.net (lon-mail-3.gradwell.net [193.111.201.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A90043D53 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 01:11:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from 82-39-75-228.cable.ubr02.jarr.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.39.75.228] helo=webmaker@asgard.uk)1.181) id 4253374b.7ac8.e for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 02:11:39 +0100 (envelope-sender ) From: dgmm To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 02:11:22 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <136953345.20050405073122@wanadoo.fr> <4252D032.9020905@toldme.com> In-Reply-To: <4252D032.9020905@toldme.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504060211.22641.freebsd01@dgmm.net> Subject: Re: Digital Cameras X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:11:42 -0000 On Tuesday 05 April 2005 18:51, Danny Howard wrote: > Another tip: reading the data is only half the battle. =A0Personally, > managing pictures is one of the three things I do with my Windows > computer. =A0(The other two are games and Quicken.) =A0The XP/2k file > browser in "thumbnail" mode is very nice for managing pictures. =A0And you > can download stuff like Picasa. =A0(Though, Flickr is a lot like "online > Picasa" but you have to pay a yearly subscription fee, and the photo > manipulation stuff depends on Flash plugin, so, for now, you need > Windows to rotate your uploaded images ....) You might want to look at the Rox Filer. Thumbnail browsing and easy to ad= d=20 extra "menu" commands which can be scripts to manipulate the pics =2D-=20 Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 01:18:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27E616A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 01:18:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from engraver.valleygate.net (12-240-1-161.client.mchsi.com [12.240.1.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C5543D94 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 01:18:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wizlayer@gmail.com) Received: from wizard.valleygate.net (wizard.valleygate.net [10.51.10.3]) j361I7ma002420 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:18:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wizlayer@gmail.com) From: wizlayer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:18:05 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <001501c53a42$a3d58860$030a000a@CTU> In-Reply-To: <001501c53a42$a3d58860$030a000a@CTU> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504052118.06366.wizlayer@gmail.com> Subject: Re: ipf.rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: wizlayer@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:18:36 -0000 On Tuesday 05 April 2005 08:50 pm, Francis Whittington wrote: > Hi all, > In ipf.rules at the section below it says to run 1st rule, > then look for ip address, put it in commented out rule and > delete 1st rule . How do I know what ip address is my isp's > DHCP server address? > > > # Allow out access to my ISP's DHCP server for cable or DSL > networks. # This rule is not needed for 'user ppp' type > connection to the # public Internet, so you can delete this > whole group. # Use the following rule and check log for IP > address. # Then put IP address in commented out rule & delete > first rule pass out log quick on dc0 proto udp from any to any > port = 67 keep state #pass out quick on dc0 proto udp from any > to z.z.z.z port = 67 keep state It sais, "Use the following rule and _check log_ for IP address..." Check your pf log (whatever it's setup to be). If your ipf.rules isn't set up to log any events, then set it up and check it again... Just the same, you could also whois your ISP and get their DNS, or call tech support and they'll tell you. HTH, WizLayer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 01:21:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9793316A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 01:21:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4395443D5C for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 01:21:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 71132513B6; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:21:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:21:46 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Gerry Freymann Message-ID: <20050406012146.GA16804@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050405174450.GB86957@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050405205236.7f7102e8.lists@interpool.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050405205236.7f7102e8.lists@interpool.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: bob@a1poweruser.com cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 4.12 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:21:47 -0000 --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:52:36PM -0400, Gerry Freymann wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:44:50 -0700 > Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > >On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:41:47PM -0400, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > >> Is there going to be a 4.12 release?? > > > >No. >=20 > So... if I've read things correctly, we are now moving to FreeBSD 5 > Release? FreeBSD 5.3 was the beginning of the new FreeBSD-STABLE branch. > And the ports will be updated for use with FBSD 5? (at least, if you want > to keep up to date?) They always have been. Both of these matters are discussed on the FreeBSD website in more detail. Kris --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUzmqWry0BWjoQKURAsjkAKCAJ8NxMf109U3JZoGM5NpbxfwyaACgkAD5 PZ+z/mIWrs5ztlRdBEMlJDg= =AlDK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 01:23:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6E416A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 01:23:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA1C43D1F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 01:23:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j361NmNr079505; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:23:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:23:48 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Gerry Freymann Message-ID: <20050406012347.GH64927@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20050405174450.GB86957@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050405205236.7f7102e8.lists@interpool.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050405205236.7f7102e8.lists@interpool.ca> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: bob@a1poweruser.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 4.12 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:23:52 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 05), Gerry Freymann said: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:44:50 -0700 > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:41:47PM -0400, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > >> Is there going to be a 4.12 release?? > > > >No. > > So... if I've read things correctly, we are now moving to FreeBSD 5 > Release? Already done. 5.3 was marked -STABLE and recommended over 4.*. > And the ports will be updated for use with FBSD 5? (at least, if you > want to keep up to date?) Ever since 5 was branched in 2002. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 02:12:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E49016A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 02:12:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp (plewe.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.81.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B10F43D3F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 02:12:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from till@plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp) Received: from plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j362LGQL099442 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:21:16 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from till@plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp) Received: (from till@localhost) by plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j362LGlN099441 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:21:16 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from till) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:21:16 +0900 From: Till Plewe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050406022116.GB99381%till@score.is.tsukuba.ac.jp> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: flockfile does not work with stdout (on X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: till@score.is.tsukuba.ac.jp List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 02:12:01 -0000 How can I control the output of processes (forked from a single process) all writing to the same file? f{un,}lockfile(file) seems to work unless file=stdout. Are there any other simple methods I can try? - Till PS. I am using 5.4-PRERELEASE i386 SMP-GENERIC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 02:37:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DF716A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 02:37:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4104A43D54 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 02:37:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from BLUELAPIS.sentex.ca (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id j362bi2t046266; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:37:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: "Ing. Christian Sudec" Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:37:44 -0400 Message-ID: References: <42525A1B.7060806@htlwrn.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <42525A1B.7060806@htlwrn.ac.at> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apcupsd with usb X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 02:37:47 -0000 On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:27:55 +0200, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: >Hi there, > >a few months back there was already a question in this list regarding >usb support in apcupsd since afaik only usb with linux is still = supported. >But there was a beta version named apcupsd-3.10.16-test2 which delivered >the functions I need. Sad but true the link was broken. Hi, the version I downloaded from sourceforge works great so far (apcupsd-3.10.17) I was just playing with it today actually. =20 Couple of caveats-- make sure the device is assigned to ugen, not uhid. To compile,=20 ./configure --prefix=3D/usr/local --sbindir=3D/usr/local/sbin = --enable-usb --sysconfdir=3D/usr/local/etc [releng5-865]# usbdevs=20 addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel addr 2: Back-UPS ES 725 FW:802.n2.D USB FW:n2, APC addr 3: U.S. Robotics 56K Faxmodem USB, U.S. Robotics addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel addr 2: USB FAST SERIAL ADAPTER, FTDI addr 3: USB Communicator, STMicroelectronics addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel [releng5-865]#=20 Here is my minimal config [releng5-865]# grep -v ^# apcupsd.conf | strings UPSNAME usb-test UPSCABLE smart UPSTYPE usb DEVICE usb /dev/uhid0 LOCKFILE /var/spool/lock ONBATTERYDELAY 6 BATTERYLEVEL 5 MINUTES 3 TIMEOUT 0 ANNOY 300 ANNOYDELAY 60 NOLOGON disable KILLDELAY 0 NETSERVER on NISIP 0.0.0.0 NISPORT 3551 EVENTSFILE /var/log/apcupsd.events EVENTSFILEMAX 10 UPSCLASS standalone UPSMODE disable STATTIME 0 STATFILE /var/log/apcupsd.status LOGSTATS off DATATIME 0 [releng5-865]#=20 [releng5-865]# apcaccess status APC : 001,033,0842 DATE : Tue Apr 05 22:32:02 EDT 2005 HOSTNAME : releng5-865.sentex.ca RELEASE : 3.10.17 VERSION : 3.10.17 (18 March 2005) freebsd UPSNAME : usb-test CABLE : Custom Cable Smart MODEL : Back-UPS ES 725 UPSMODE : Stand Alone STARTTIME: Tue Apr 05 17:40:20 EDT 2005 STATUS : ONLINE=20 LINEV : 119.0 Volts LOADPCT : 12.0 Percent Load Capacity BCHARGE : 100.0 Percent TIMELEFT : 42.5 Minutes MBATTCHG : 5 Percent MINTIMEL : 3 Minutes MAXTIME : 0 Seconds LOTRANS : 088.0 Volts HITRANS : 138.0 Volts ALARMDEL : Always BATTV : 13.5 Volts NUMXFERS : 0 TONBATT : 0 seconds CUMONBATT: 0 seconds XOFFBATT : N/A STATFLAG : 0x02000008 Status Flag MANDATE : 2002-10-23 SERIALNO : AB0243121472 =20 BATTDATE : 2000-00-00 NOMBATTV : 12.0 =46IRMWARE : 02.n2.D USB FW:n2 APCMODEL : Back-UPS ES 725 END APC : Tue Apr 05 22:32:05 EDT 2005 [releng5-865]#=20 If I kill the power Broadcast Message from root@releng5-865.sentex.ca (no tty) at 22:32 EDT... Warning power loss detected. Broadcast Message from root@releng5-865.sentex.ca (no tty) at 22:32 EDT... Power failure. Running on UPS batteries. [releng5-865]# apcaccess status APC : 001,034,0884 DATE : Tue Apr 05 22:32:55 EDT 2005 HOSTNAME : releng5-865.sentex.ca RELEASE : 3.10.17 VERSION : 3.10.17 (18 March 2005) freebsd UPSNAME : usb-test CABLE : Custom Cable Smart MODEL : Back-UPS ES 725 UPSMODE : Stand Alone STARTTIME: Tue Apr 05 17:40:20 EDT 2005 STATUS : ONBATT=20 LINEV : 001.0 Volts LOADPCT : 10.0 Percent Load Capacity BCHARGE : 099.0 Percent TIMELEFT : 44.4 Minutes MBATTCHG : 5 Percent MINTIMEL : 3 Minutes MAXTIME : 0 Seconds LOTRANS : 088.0 Volts HITRANS : 138.0 Volts ALARMDEL : Always BATTV : 12.6 Volts NUMXFERS : 1 XONBATT : Tue Apr 05 22:32:45 EDT 2005 TONBATT : 11 seconds CUMONBATT: 11 seconds XOFFBATT : N/A STATFLAG : 0x02068010 Status Flag MANDATE : 2002-10-23 SERIALNO : AB0243121472 =20 BATTDATE : 2000-00-00 NOMBATTV : 12.0 =46IRMWARE : 02.n2.D USB FW:n2 APCMODEL : Back-UPS ES 725 END APC : Tue Apr 05 22:32:56 EDT 2005 Broadcast Message from root@releng5-865.sentex.ca (no tty) at 22:33 EDT... Power has returned... [releng5-865]#=20 [releng5-865]# apcaccess status APC : 001,034,0908 DATE : Tue Apr 05 22:33:15 EDT 2005 HOSTNAME : releng5-865.sentex.ca RELEASE : 3.10.17 VERSION : 3.10.17 (18 March 2005) freebsd UPSNAME : usb-test CABLE : Custom Cable Smart MODEL : Back-UPS ES 725 UPSMODE : Stand Alone STARTTIME: Tue Apr 05 17:40:20 EDT 2005 STATUS : ONLINE=20 LINEV : 118.0 Volts LOADPCT : 10.0 Percent Load Capacity BCHARGE : 082.0 Percent TIMELEFT : 36.8 Minutes MBATTCHG : 5 Percent MINTIMEL : 3 Minutes MAXTIME : 0 Seconds LOTRANS : 088.0 Volts HITRANS : 138.0 Volts ALARMDEL : Always BATTV : 12.6 Volts NUMXFERS : 1 XONBATT : Tue Apr 05 22:32:45 EDT 2005 TONBATT : 0 seconds CUMONBATT: 25 seconds XOFFBATT : Tue Apr 05 22:33:10 EDT 2005 STATFLAG : 0x02000008 Status Flag MANDATE : 2002-10-23 SERIALNO : AB0243121472 =20 BATTDATE : 2000-00-00 NOMBATTV : 12.0 =46IRMWARE : 02.n2.D USB FW:n2 APCMODEL : Back-UPS ES 725 END APC : Tue Apr 05 22:33:15 EDT 2005 [releng5-865]#=20 ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net Providing Internet Access since 1994 mike@sentex.net, (http://www.tancsa.com) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 02:39:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCD116A4CF for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 02:39:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anubis.eyede.com (anubis.eyede.com [202.21.136.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0433243D4C for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 02:39:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@eyede.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.eyede.com [127.0.0.1]) by anubis.eyede.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974474AC2F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:39:36 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [172.16.99.14] (ewsn04.ntdns.eyede.com [172.16.99.14]) by anubis.eyede.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3DD4AC61 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:39:33 +1200 (NZST) Message-ID: <42534BF1.1050105@eyede.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:39:45 +1200 From: Nigel Wohlers User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050328) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd at eyede.com Subject: PHP support for --with-oci8-instant-client X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@eyede.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 02:39:27 -0000 Hi All, Has anyone attempted to get Oracle Instant Client (http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/notes/technote_php_instant.html) working with PHP(4.3.11 or 5.0.4). Basically you download the rpm's or zip's supplied by oracle and add the --with-oci8-instant-client=/usr/lib/oracle/10.1.0.3/client to PHP configure flags. Of course this dies a horrible death because the libraries are in linux format: /usr/bin/ld: warning: libdl.so.2, needed by /usr/lib/oracle/10.1.0.3/client/libclntsh.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/bin/ld: warning: libm.so.6, needed by /usr/lib/oracle/10.1.0.3/client/libclntsh.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/bin/ld: warning: libpthread.so.0, needed by /usr/lib/oracle/10.1.0.3/client/libclntsh.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/bin/ld: warning: libnsl.so.1, needed by /usr/lib/oracle/10.1.0.3/client/libclntsh.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/bin/ld: warning: libc.so.6, needed by /usr/lib/oracle/10.1.0.3/client/libclntsh.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) Any suggestions? Regards, Nigel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 02:40:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3454816A4CE; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 02:40:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D167F43D2F; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 02:40:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from BLUELAPIS.sentex.ca (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id j362eJ9W046359; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:40:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: Dustin Wilhoit Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:40:19 -0400 Message-ID: <8ti651lgqiguv9tld6covi8ubsk2fvbggm@4ax.com> References: <20050405173450.01D3916A4DC@hub.freebsd.org> <595aee4d9b8e85e98d8081938c0955d4@elhombre.us> In-Reply-To: <595aee4d9b8e85e98d8081938c0955d4@elhombre.us> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Geom_gbde and Hardware Crypto Accelerators X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 02:40:25 -0000 On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:21:34 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: >After searching google and the archives I wasn't able to find any=20 >current information on the status of hardware cryptographic=20 >accelerators (like the Soekris vpn1401) and gbde. Can gbde harness the=20 >power of one of these accelerator cards yet? If so do they provide=20 >significant offloading from the processor(s)? Any comments on the=20 >Soekris vpn1401 card I've been thinking about? Thanks in advance. Hi, It wont work. I know the authorth was thinking about adding VIA C3/Padlock support, but not sure the details. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net Providing Internet Access since 1994 mike@sentex.net, (http://www.tancsa.com) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 03:36:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6FD16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 03:36:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (fed1rmmtao05.cox.net [68.230.241.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54ADF43D54 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 03:36:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mnavarre@cox.net) Received: from reichlieu.lan ([68.6.195.68]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050406033655.GWSG7956.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@reichlieu.lan>; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:36:55 -0400 Received: from reichlieu.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by reichlieu.lan (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j363ausD028574; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:36:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mnavarre@cox.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reichlieu.lan (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j363atju028573; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:36:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mnavarre@cox.net) X-Authentication-Warning: reichlieu.lan: mnavarre set sender to mnavarre@cox.net using -f From: Matt Navarre To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Gareth Bailey Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:36:53 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <48a5f32a050405031350803bb2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <48a5f32a050405031350803bb2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504052036.55181.mnavarre@cox.net> Subject: Re: Copying files off Samba Server - freezes/very slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 03:36:57 -0000 On Tuesday 05 April 2005 03:13 am, Gareth Bailey wrote: > I have just upgraded the hardware of our development server. I thought > that our file server used to be slow due to slow hardware, but now > that we have upgraded I am a bit puzzled. > > Samba seems to slow or hang (top reports smbd CPU usage as 40%) when > files are copied off the server using windows explorer on the client. What version of Samba and FreeBSD? I was seeing the same thing on a 5.3 box with samba 3. I didn't look into the problem that much, since the box was a temporary solution and samba wasn't that big a deal. I did upgrade to 5.4-PRERELEASE about a week ago, and also upgraded samba. It helped a bit, but didn't solve the problem. It did reduce the amount of CPU and the length of time it monopolized the CPU by about 40% > > Can anyone sugeest a reason for this behaviour? Like I said, I didn't look into it too much since I had a new RedHat box on order and just assumed the box was overloaded. But to hazard a guess, I'd say there might be some weird reaction between FreeBSD 5.3 and samba 3. > > Thanks, > Gareth -- but transforming oneself into a helicopter of fists certainly has its appeal as well. --Jonah Goldberg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 03:40:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9522016A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 03:40:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273AD43D2D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 03:40:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j363enI4040237 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:40:49 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:40:49 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050406034049.GI64927@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20050406022116.GB99381%till@score.is.tsukuba.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050406022116.GB99381%till@score.is.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Subject: Re: flockfile does not work with stdout (on X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 03:40:50 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 06), Till Plewe said: > How can I control the output of processes (forked from a single > process) all writing to the same file? > f{un,}lockfile(file) seems to work unless file=stdout. If they are still the same process image (i.e. no execs), you could mmap some ANONYMOUS|SHARED memory and wait on a flag byte with atomic_cmpset(). Actually, writing to stdout should be atomic for most writes (I have never seen gcc output garbled when doing parallel makes for example). -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 04:17:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7322D16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 04:17:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CB143D39 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 04:17:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so70347rng for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:17:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=fiRP9h6DAjFn/fYnXpPucierNPqwAZDHhDnqnQZnJap67St8ATCd8dJwiNsqQauaGDHr1hCOhkpJ0fiVbnrKh+eDjncSHCLgSJ8rmrm2BdAw428MbFpiGpUoTr03GdF2PcBgjcxFK5ZBKVVxxXScYG/N4U35w2KYkVZtA+L1qdk= Received: by 10.38.67.25 with SMTP id p25mr388982rna; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:17:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:17:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 06:17:31 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: bob@a1poweruser.com In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: efax with a serial 3com us robotics 56k modem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 04:17:32 -0000 On Apr 5, 2005 2:51 PM, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > I believe your xfax modem is what is called a winmodem. > These type of cheap modems are built just for the ms/windows market > and do not work on FreeBSD. > They are missing the onboard hardware controller which is why you > have to install the win driver that comes with it. > > http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php > > The above URL has very good step by step instructions on > configurating ppp for external modem with info on how to verify if > your modem is a winmodem. tip com1 connected AT ok It works yahoo i have a working modem :) Does a fax uses ppp ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 05:13:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0210516A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:13:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp (plewe.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.81.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8D543D41 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:13:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from till@plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp) Received: from plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j365MVsi099742 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:22:31 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from till@plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp) Received: (from till@localhost) by plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j365MVTm099741 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:22:31 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from till) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:22:31 +0900 From: Till Plewe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050406052231.GA99716%till@score.is.tsukuba.ac.jp> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: flockfile does not work with stdout (on X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: till@score.is.tsukuba.ac.jp List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:13:16 -0000 On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:40:49PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Apr 06), Till Plewe said: > > How can I control the output of processes (forked from a single > > process) all writing to the same file? > > f{un,}lockfile(file) seems to work unless file=stdout. > > If they are still the same process image (i.e. no execs), you could > mmap some ANONYMOUS|SHARED memory and wait on a flag byte with > atomic_cmpset(). Actually, writing to stdout should be atomic for most > writes (I have never seen gcc output garbled when doing parallel makes > for example). > The life span of each process is quite short (<0.001s) and the system load is fairly high (~40) Thanks, your suggestion works. In fact flockfile also works if I use cons25 instead of {x,ml,...}term. So the culprit may be X. - Till From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 05:25:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D0316A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:25:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5593C43D55 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:25:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j365PfFM005440; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:25:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Mike Tancsa From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:40:19 EDT." <8ti651lgqiguv9tld6covi8ubsk2fvbggm@4ax.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:25:41 +0200 Message-ID: <5439.1112765141@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk cc: Dustin Wilhoit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Geom_gbde and Hardware Crypto Accelerators X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:25:45 -0000 In message <8ti651lgqiguv9tld6covi8ubsk2fvbggm@4ax.com>, Mike Tancsa writes: >On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:21:34 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions >you wrote: > >>After searching google and the archives I wasn't able to find any >>current information on the status of hardware cryptographic >>accelerators (like the Soekris vpn1401) and gbde. Can gbde harness the >>power of one of these accelerator cards yet? If so do they provide >>significant offloading from the processor(s)? Any comments on the >>Soekris vpn1401 card I've been thinking about? Thanks in advance. > >Hi, > It wont work. I know the authorth was thinking about adding >VIA C3/Padlock support, but not sure the details. There is partial support for opencrypto/hifn/vpn1401 in the p4 branch phk_gbde, but it doesn't help very much because of the high setup overhead of the hifn chip. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 05:28:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6149E16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:28:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3AE43D1F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:28:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tejaswytej@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so80053rng for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:28:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ijxgWPFzRU6s7sn4eKCxWpY2j3PBDO396QiWg6dPPXh3uH/vuDTGGpRoPhncY1cPf2NCw6jn6LAzDM20ezrAPJawlfKfL3TvVGxCfe7tQ4mieSIILZ+4rzqxSpQvomK/tq6T9vyXJlZGMmYtsYHuKdMkN7U47/WguKNXhSUGyS8= Received: by 10.38.5.72 with SMTP id 72mr448199rne; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:28:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.152.18 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:28:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6609b1bd05040522287b822562@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:58:13 +0530 From: Tejaswy Appalla To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050405173450.F0FDA16A4E2@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050405173450.F0FDA16A4E2@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 93, Issue 7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tejaswy Appalla List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:28:14 -0000 i just got the latest freebsd 5.3 & started installing it. The system booted with the cd and a series of things appeared (including saturn "the red guy") on the screen until it got hanged up. I dont know what to do. The last two lines that appeared after which the system hanged were: ado: WARNING - READ_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA = 78165297 ado: WARNING - READ_DMA interrupt was seen but taskqueue stalled LBA = 78165297 I've tried using ATA100 instead of the ATA66 in my motherboard, but iti too didn't helped. please suggest what to do. thanks. Tejaswy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 05:32:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB42816A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:32:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC00743D1F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:32:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maverick31337@vfemail.net) Received: from unknown (HELO ?219.197.212.112?) (fcknroll2@219.197.212.112 with plain) by smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2005 05:32:45 -0000 Message-ID: <4253747B.9010808@vfemail.net> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:32:43 +0900 From: "Tetsuji \"Maverick\" Rai" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050401 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: make nodes for new disk with devfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:32:47 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm having a problem with devfs in 6-current. I used to use FreeBSD about 7-8 years ago, but since then I've been using Linux, and got back to freebsd these days, and found MAKEDEV has gone!! I was astonished to see major nodes of all devices are 12!! Neither "man devfs" nor "info devfs" give me good info. I cannot find good info in /usr/share/doc either. My question is simple: how to make nodes in /dev for ad1 slice/partitions? I don't know major/minor numbers, or usage of devfs. I googled for usage of devfs, but it's too new for me to find the proper usage....even in FreeBSD Handbook. Will anyone give me a proper direction or resource? Thanks in advance.. - -- Tetsuji 'Maverick' Rai PGP Key fingerprint = 2021 6BF9 CEA3 73DE FF17 B326 F4DA F04E F784 3B85 gpg fingerprint Aviation Jokes: http://www.geocities.com/tetsuji_rai/ Profile http://maverick.ns1.name/ http://maverick.IsASecret.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCU3R69NrwTveEO4URAs8GAKCFQmjhBG3MrrFUQA3xcghFjjn/zQCfQgyN 4f519RCEecKf5f8vQMqc5us= =3U65 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 05:52:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1096B16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:52:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vs2.bgnett.no (vs02.bgnett.no [194.54.96.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F149143D58 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:52:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Received: from amidala.datadok.no.bgnett.no ([194.54.107.19]) by vs2.bgnett.no (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j365qM5b050567; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:52:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <42528039.1010708@tiscali.co.uk> From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen) Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:49:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <42528039.1010708@tiscali.co.uk> (bertybadboy's message of "Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:10:33 +0100") Message-ID: <86psx8314q.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-bgnett.no-virusscanner: Found to be clean X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, i.am.a.hedgehog@gmail.com cc: bertybadboy Subject: Re: .iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:52:35 -0000 bertybadboy writes: > Which .iso files do i download and burn onto a cd? I think this is a FAQ more or less, but anyway - for a 'normal' install, with base system and a reasonable helping of the most popular packages, what you need is a -disc1.iso (which comes in two flavors in 4.11 - kde and gnome respectively - and I think tihs will also be the case for 5.n releases from 5.4 onwards). disc2 is traditionally the live filesystem, while miniinst is for a minimal install. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 06:01:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6038C16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 06:01:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54009.mail.yahoo.com (web54009.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAE3643D31 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 06:01:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 23569 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Apr 2005 06:01:48 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=NeUsPcZRo7dRVzs4QucXR63ioTCX336bvJfg/1d8WnDhg7CjpKmrwWmyBnuG4txJKS+0wz6l7LjkI38RD3Y2zVw+ysI2WgyC43Hpia0B46hDKVRVfIilpI7kA/QN+4sDNmvxD1FWb4djhY5MnunE19TC35zwSO++CX/rr/aKh+A= ; Message-ID: <20050406060148.23567.qmail@web54009.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [147.46.44.181] by web54009.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 23:01:47 PDT Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:01:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Rob To: FreeBSD questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Procmail: how to deliver email over an ssh-tunnel to my smtp server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 06:01:49 -0000 Hello, I'm having 4.11 and 5.3 FreeBSD PCs. All incoming email arrives through fetchmail (using imap protocol). I then filter all email with procmail, which is configured such that it trashes spam, or delivers to local mailbox, or forwards to another external address. For external delivery, I have set up an ssh tunnel to my smtp server: ssh -N -f -L 2525:localhost:25 smtp.server.it What do I have to do next, to have the delivery work properly? Can I tell procmail to push the email directly onto the port 2525 of the ssh tunnel? Or do I have to reconfigure sendmail for this? (sendmail reconfiguration info looks like a nightmare to me though....). Do I have other options? Thanks, Rob. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. http://personals.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 07:15:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B6716A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:15:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6972C43D39 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:15:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xmisoy@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so94820rng for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:15:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=k92zbibauMb2TQouBjSnPiSybyVvH9n9maz4fAgM8BIy0B2NlnuNjw/9hoz0zmOPuF8eyEP08uJj4Wl/6ABkvhaueh2BPrYau2zwRFWvZhMb+tsO72V/ARRB7lj7TuLqwZXnzb6VuYF/ALEL9lXFDjFx/p91RAE87nSDV430koA= Received: by 10.38.160.52 with SMTP id i52mr508431rne; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.39.1.44 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <36f5bbba050406001514562df7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:15:28 +0000 From: "Edwin D. Vinas" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: too many illegal connection attempts through ssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Edwin D. Vinas" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:15:29 -0000 hello, shown below is snapshot of too many illegal attempts to login to my server from a suspicious hacker. this is taken from the "/var/log/auth.log". my question is, how do i automatically block an IP address if it is attempting to guess my login usernames? can i configure the firewall to check the instances a certain IP has attempted to access/ssh the sevrer, and if it has failed to login for about "x" number of attempts, it will be blocked automatically? thank you in advance! -edwin ---------------- Mar 26 05:00:00 pawikan newsyslog[11879]: logfile turned over due to size>1= 00K Mar 26 22:49:29 pawikan sshd[66637]: Illegal user test from 211.176.33.46 Mar 26 22:49:32 pawikan sshd[66639]: Illegal user guest from 211.176.33.46 Mar 26 22:49:35 pawikan sshd[66641]: Illegal user admin from 211.176.33.46 Mar 26 22:49:37 pawikan sshd[66643]: Illegal user admin from 211.176.33.46 Mar 26 22:49:40 pawikan sshd[66645]: Illegal user user from 211.176.33.46 Mar 26 22:49:50 pawikan sshd[66654]: Illegal user test from 211.176.33.46 Mar 27 02:50:12 pawikan sshd[69369]: Illegal user test from 210.0.141.89 Mar 27 02:50:14 pawikan sshd[69463]: Illegal user guest from 210.0.141.89 Mar 27 02:50:15 pawikan sshd[69650]: Illegal user admin from 210.0.141.89 Mar 27 02:50:17 pawikan sshd[69745]: Illegal user admin from 210.0.141.89 Mar 27 02:50:18 pawikan sshd[69858]: Illegal user user from 210.0.141.89 Mar 27 02:50:24 pawikan sshd[70319]: Illegal user test from 210.0.141.89 Mar 27 04:10:58 pawikan sshd[5171]: Illegal user test from 218.188.9.202 Mar 27 04:10:59 pawikan sshd[5173]: Illegal user guest from 218.188.9.202 Mar 27 04:11:00 pawikan sshd[5175]: Illegal user admin from 218.188.9.202 Mar 27 04:11:01 pawikan sshd[5190]: Illegal user admin from 218.188.9.202 Mar 27 04:11:02 pawikan sshd[5192]: Illegal user user from 218.188.9.202 Mar 27 04:11:07 pawikan sshd[5200]: Illegal user test from 218.188.9.202 Mar 27 12:13:21 pawikan sshd[9236]: Did not receive identification string from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:23:03 pawikan sshd[13482]: Illegal user jordan from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:23:07 pawikan sshd[13484]: Illegal user michael from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:23:11 pawikan sshd[13486]: Illegal user nicole from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:23:14 pawikan sshd[13488]: Illegal user daniel from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:23:18 pawikan sshd[13490]: Illegal user andrew from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:23:21 pawikan sshd[13492]: Illegal user nathan from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:23:25 pawikan sshd[13494]: Illegal user matthew from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:23:29 pawikan sshd[13496]: Illegal user magic from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:23:33 pawikan sshd[13498]: Illegal user lion from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:23:37 pawikan sshd[13500]: Illegal user david from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:23:41 pawikan sshd[13502]: Illegal user jason from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:23:45 pawikan sshd[13504]: Illegal user ben from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:23:49 pawikan sshd[13506]: Illegal user carmen from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:23:53 pawikan sshd[13510]: Illegal user justin from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:23:57 pawikan sshd[13512]: Illegal user charlie from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:24:02 pawikan sshd[13514]: Illegal user steven from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:24:06 pawikan sshd[13517]: Illegal user brandon from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:24:09 pawikan sshd[13519]: Illegal user brian from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:24:13 pawikan sshd[13521]: Illegal user stephen from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:24:17 pawikan sshd[13523]: Illegal user william from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:24:21 pawikan sshd[13525]: Illegal user angel from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:24:27 pawikan sshd[13527]: Illegal user emily from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:24:31 pawikan sshd[13529]: Illegal user eric from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:24:36 pawikan sshd[13531]: Illegal user joe from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:24:39 pawikan sshd[13533]: Illegal user tom from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:24:43 pawikan sshd[13535]: Illegal user billy from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:24:47 pawikan sshd[13537]: Illegal user buddy from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:24:50 pawikan sshd[13540]: Illegal user jeremy from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:24:54 pawikan sshd[13542]: Illegal user vampire from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:24:57 pawikan sshd[13544]: Illegal user betty from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:25:00 pawikan sshd[13546]: Illegal user henry from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:25:04 pawikan sshd[13749]: Illegal user max from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:25:07 pawikan sshd[14024]: Illegal user nicholas from 61.59.143.2= 7 Mar 27 12:25:11 pawikan sshd[14336]: Illegal user robin from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:25:15 pawikan sshd[14644]: Illegal user system from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:25:18 pawikan sshd[14904]: Illegal user johnny from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:25:22 pawikan sshd[15221]: Illegal user lucy from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:25:26 pawikan sshd[15521]: Illegal user market from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:25:32 pawikan sshd[15673]: Illegal user lp from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:25:37 pawikan sshd[15675]: Illegal user maria from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:25:42 pawikan sshd[15677]: Illegal user rose from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:25:47 pawikan sshd[15679]: Illegal user mail from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:25:52 pawikan sshd[15681]: Illegal user god from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:25:56 pawikan sshd[15683]: Illegal user barbara from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:26:05 pawikan sshd[15688]: Illegal user larisa from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:26:10 pawikan sshd[15690]: Illegal user shell from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:26:15 pawikan sshd[15692]: Illegal user jane from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:26:19 pawikan sshd[15694]: Illegal user dog from 61.59.143.27 Mar 27 12:26:23 pawikan sshd[15696]: Illegal user blue from 61.59.143.27 --=20 -- Edwin D. Vi=F1as http://www.geocities.com/edwin_vinas/ IN THE WORLD OF SCIENCE, NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE. -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 07:29:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C9816A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:29:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A980E43D2D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:28:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com) (jtinnin@pacbell.net@64.171.3.164 with login) by smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2005 07:28:59 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Edwin D. Vinas" Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:28:58 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <36f5bbba050406001514562df7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <36f5bbba050406001514562df7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504060028.58572.krinklyfig@spymac.com> Subject: Re: too many illegal connection attempts through ssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:29:00 -0000 On Wednesday 06 April 2005 00:15, "Edwin D. Vinas" wrote: > hello, > > shown below is snapshot of too many illegal attempts to login to my > server from a suspicious hacker. this is taken from the > "/var/log/auth.log". my question is, how do i automatically block an > IP address if it is attempting to guess my login usernames? The easiest way to fix this problem most of the time is just change the ssh port to something else, like a high numbered port that's otherwise unassigned. > can i > configure the firewall to check the instances a certain IP has > attempted to access/ssh the sevrer, and if it has failed to login for > about "x" number of attempts, it will be blocked automatically? Yes, the best way to deal with this is through the firewall rather than sshd, if you still get people hammering away at your ssh port even after you change it. What are you using? You might want to check in chapter 24 of the handbook ... - jt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 07:34:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F035216A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:34:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54005.mail.yahoo.com (web54005.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60EFC43D45 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:34:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 44630 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Apr 2005 07:34:25 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=w+9Go1crvyY75NaECKs/4xy0AbHRkPgc1fZYecn6ZD+QAhs2DYJf+BjfiysiHl7S3SiLnRPWUSUzeOuplSkk6q8a1XuBwk7h2BDYjux5jJhbVGdsSRoLJxOn6bUP0jAmlLe4yfESQsxVcAwKPG2sJPbJTWZqdgRGzZU7KAgtl1M= ; Message-ID: <20050406073425.44628.qmail@web54005.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [147.46.44.181] by web54005.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:34:25 PDT Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:34:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Rob To: FreeBSD questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: xmisoy@gmail.com Subject: Re: too many illegal connection attempts through ssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:34:27 -0000 Edwin D. Vinas wrote: > hello, > > shown below is snapshot of too many illegal > attempts to login to my server from a suspicious > hacker. this is taken from the "/var/log/auth.log". > my question is, how do i automatically block an > IP address if it is attempting to guess my login > usernames? can i configure the firewall to check > the instances a certain IP has My solution is not full proof, but appears to be good enough to stop these bulk attacks on my server. I use a combination of firewall & alternative sshd port. For example, in /etc/rc.conf, I have: sshd_enable="YES" sshd_flags="-p 22 -p 1234" (choose 1234 whatever alternative port number you prefer) Then add two tcp rules to your firewall: ipfw add allow log tcp from 55.44.33.22/11 to \ ${oip} ssh in via ${oif} setup ipfw add allow log tcp from any to ${oip} 1234 \ in via ${oif} setup where "55.44.33.22/11" represents your, more or less, trusted nearby network, ${oip} your outbound IP and ${oif} your outbound interface (e.g. rl0). I suppose you're familiar enough with firewall rules. These firewall rules allow 'regular' ssh connections only from within your nearby network; all other parties must connect over the alternative port number, 1234 in this example. Regards, Rob. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Sign up for Fantasy Baseball. http://baseball.fantasysports.yahoo.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 07:38:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3399316A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:38:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from publications.ftw.tuwien.ac.at (nt-ftw.ftw.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.90.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91DB43D1D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:38:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petrasch@FTW.at) Received: from nt_ftw.ftw.tuwien.ac.at by publications.ftw.tuwien.ac.at ESMTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:00:18 +0100 Received: from erriapo.ftw.local ([192.168.0.47]) by mail.ftw.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:40:28 +0200 From: "Martin Petraschek" To: "Dan Nelson" Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:40:28 +0200 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2380) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;2) In-Reply-To: <20050405155651.GD64927@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2005 07:40:28.0385 (UTC) FILETIME=[E72DBD10:01C53A7B] cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Viewing DNS cache entries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Petraschek List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:38:38 -0000 >In the last episode (Apr 05), Martin Petraschek said: >> On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:36:35 -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: >> >In the last episode (Apr 05), Martin Petraschek said: >> >> The operating system is caching DNS name resolutions in order to >> >> avoid repeated DNS requests for the same hostname. Is it possible >> >> to display the entries of that DNS cache? >> >> >> >> Under Windows, the command "ipconfig /displaydns" exists, and I >> >> would need that functionality under FreeBSD. >> > >> >You can use the "rndc dump" command, which will create a file that >> >contains all of the currently-cached DNS entries. If you are >> >> The rndc command does not exist on my 4.10 box. > >It was called "ndc" in bind 8 (which is what comes with 4.*). > >> Anyhow, I am not running a nameserver on this machine. Is this a >> prequisite for your suggestion to work? > >Yes; if you are not running a nameserver, then the OS won't cache any >DNS entries at all. Every lookup will result in a DNS request to one >of the servers listed in /etc/resolv.conf. Maybe you have some static >entries in /etc/hosts? That file is checked before DNS; edit >/etc/host.conf to change the lookup order. Thank you, Dan. I was not aware of the fact that FreeBSD does not cache DNS entries unless you are running a name server. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 07:43:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC14116A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:43:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from publications.ftw.tuwien.ac.at (nt-ftw.ftw.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.90.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5415743D31 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:43:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petrasch@FTW.at) Received: from nt_ftw.ftw.tuwien.ac.at by publications.ftw.tuwien.ac.at ESMTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:05:14 +0100 Received: from erriapo.ftw.local ([192.168.0.47]) by mail.ftw.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:45:25 +0200 From: "Martin Petraschek" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:45:25 +0200 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2380) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2005 07:45:25.0187 (UTC) FILETIME=[98162130:01C53A7C] Subject: IPv6 ICMP multicast response X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Petraschek List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:43:35 -0000 Hi, By default, FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP multicast echo requests. For IPv4 this behaviour can be changed with sysctl net.inet.icmp.bmcastecho=0|1 Is there a similar control for IPv6? Thank you, Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 07:48:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C5716A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:48:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.r.caley.org.uk (82-41-208-48.cable.ubr12.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.208.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2E143D2D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:48:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rjc@caley.org.uk) Received: from pele.r.caley.org.uk (pele.r.caley.org.uk [10.0.0.12]) by mail.r.caley.org.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j367mOUn003810; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:48:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjc@caley.org.uk) Received: from pele.r.caley.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pele.r.caley.org.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j367mOu0088298; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:48:24 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjc@bast.r.caley.org.uk) Received: (from rjc@localhost) by pele.r.caley.org.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j367mNWg088295; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:48:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjc@bast.r.caley.org.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: pele.r.caley.org.uk: rjc set sender to rjc@bast.r.caley.org.uk using -f Sender: rjc@caley.org.uk To: mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx References: <63501.201.135.130.41.1112718721.squirrel@201.135.130.41> From: Richard Caley In-Reply-To: <63501.201.135.130.41.1112718721.squirrel@201.135.130.41> Date: 06 Apr 2005 08:48:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87ekdo2vnc.fsf@pele.r.caley.org.uk> Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: shell question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:48:33 -0000 In article <63501.201.135.130.41.1112718721.squirrel@201.135.130.41>, mrspock (m) writes: m> The problem is that I don't want to use the temporary m> file that I used above (stdout, stderr, out), I just m> want a "filter" If you want to rearange the output so that all the errors are after all the non errors, then you are going to need storage of some sort. I think that is logically unavoidable. There may be some kind of shuffle you can do with named pipes or something, but those kind of things have limited storage. Any time your command produces more error output than that space can hold, it will be stopped. Since you are not reading that stream until the main output is finished you'd then have a deadlock. -- Mail me as MYFIRSTNAME@MYLASTNAME.org.uk _O_ |< From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 08:32:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE92C16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:32:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay13-f12.bay13.hotmail.com [64.4.31.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8910F43D46 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:32:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from u260s4@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 01:32:54 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 62.2.92.2 by by13fd.bay13.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:32:54 GMT X-Originating-IP: [62.2.92.2] X-Originating-Email: [u260s4@hotmail.com] X-Sender: u260s4@hotmail.com From: "Manuel Manuel" To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:32:54 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2005 08:32:54.0401 (UTC) FILETIME=[3A59AF10:01C53A83] Subject: 6-CURRENT installation from boot cd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:32:54 -0000 Hi there, I'm looking for a 6-CURRENT bootonly CD image. http://www.freebsd.org/where.html ... tells me the following: "If you're interested in a purely experimental snapshot release of FreeBSD-CURRENT (AKA 6.0-CURRENT), aimed at developers and bleeding-edge testers only, then please see the daily snapshot server FTP site." Unfortunately I didn't find an appropriate image there. ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/ISO-IMAGES/00SNAPSHOTS_CD_README The readme file above, does not mention the 6-CURRENT release and everything on this server looks quite old to me. Am I looking at the wrong place? Where can I find a bootonly cd image which lets me boot with it and download a 6-CURRENT snapshot via FTP? If there does not exist something like that, what is the best and recommended way to install a 6-CURRENT release? (Yes, I want to develop on this machine if someone is going to ask me that.) If someone could point me in the right direction it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. _________________________________________________________________ Highlight Viewer - heben Sie von Ihnen gesuchte Wörter auf Webseiten hervor. http://toolbar.msn.ch?&DI=165&XAPID=2170 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 09:15:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540CF16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:15:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E49D43D60 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:15:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@MHoerich.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Apr 2005 09:15:31 -0000 Received: from pD953CD25.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO localhost) [217.83.205.37] by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 06 Apr 2005 11:15:31 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5114400 Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:15:27 +0200 From: Mario Hoerich To: Tetsuji Maverick Rai Message-ID: <20050406091526.GA48905@Pandora.MHoerich.de> References: <4253747B.9010808@vfemail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4253747B.9010808@vfemail.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make nodes for new disk with devfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:15:34 -0000 # Tetsuji Maverick Rai: > > Hi, I'm having a problem with devfs in 6-current. I used to use > FreeBSD about 7-8 years ago, but since then I've been using Linux, and > got back to freebsd these days, and found MAKEDEV has gone!! Jup. > My question is simple: how to make nodes in /dev for ad1 > slice/partitions? Well, that's the neat thing about devfs: you don't. Once you slice your disks, the respective nodes are created automagically. :) Cheers, Mario From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 10:07:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C655E16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:07:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563E143D49 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:07:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [IPv6???1] (localhost.daemonsecurity.com [127.0.0.1]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1A8FE642; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:07:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4253B4CE.6070504@locolomo.org> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:07:10 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050314 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, en-gb, da, fr, de, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Edwin D. Vinas" References: <36f5bbba050406001514562df7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <36f5bbba050406001514562df7@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: too many illegal connection attempts through ssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:07:27 -0000 Edwin D. Vinas wrote: > shown below is snapshot of too many illegal attempts to login to my > server from a suspicious hacker. this is taken from the > "/var/log/auth.log". my question is, how do i automatically block an > IP address if it is attempting to guess my login usernames? can i > configure the firewall to check the instances a certain IP has > attempted to access/ssh the sevrer, and if it has failed to login for > about "x" number of attempts, it will be blocked automatically? This question is asked on the list ever so often - see the archives for suggestions. These are automated attacks, they come regularly as crackers, black hats or script kidies scan across the net. You can avoid the automated scanning by chaning port, but this won't stop the determined cracker - he will scan all your ports and identify which services are running on which ports. Ask yourself a few questions: * Do you need to allow ssh from anywhere? If not, restrict to the relevant ip blocks. * Do you need to allow password based authentication? If not, disable it and use only ssh keys, in sshd_config: PasswordAuthentication no PubkeyAuthentication yes * Do all users need to have ssh access? If not, restrict to specific groups of users, in sshd_config, eg: AllowGroups staff * Is it a problem appart from the log messages? Trying to login with a nonexistent username is usually not a problem. Other tips: Disable ssh1, reduce the number of simultaneous non-authen- ticated connections, set timeouts etc. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 10:15:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8487416A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:15:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE2443D46 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:15:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slapinid@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so56574nzk for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 03:15:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Dyw509pqEt0JV5n4xnmq1ZMFqgxZ4GuemCakqpk+Hkkmqirz9ba4Jdjb+kxqor2vlTAh+5IuAr0lj3tNr79Kgu6PBRqQor/pzP+lhQEWEvrmRjT3QOBIkTNXggpm+Sju7PDxQz3cblZkkWfKWxPvxoAz6sXFEN5qPJHelOfdWZs= Received: by 10.36.108.14 with SMTP id g14mr13460nzc; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 03:15:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.34.14 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 03:15:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48239d3905040603151d42553d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:15:05 +0400 From: Sergey Lapin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44u0ml8dd5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <48239d3905040404285e13067b@mail.gmail.com> <44u0ml8dd5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Subject: Re: dummynet problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sergey Lapin List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:15:07 -0000 > I don't use dummynet myself, but surely it would be easier to help you > if you described what the actual problem is? > Well, actual problem description: FreeBSD-5.3 router; rl0 - internal interface rl1 - external. rl1 is connected to ADSL modem from provider; The link bandwidth is 64kbps. ${fwcmd} -f flush ${fwcmd} -f pipe flush ${fwcmd} pipe 1 config bw 64Kbit/s queue 10KBytes ${fwcmd} queue 4 config pipe 1 weight 1 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff buckets 10 queue 9 gred 0.002/7/21/0.1 ${fwcmd} add 780 queue 4 log logamount 10 tcp from any to 192.168.0.30/32 out via rl0 ${fwcmd} queue 10 config pipe 1 weight 100 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff queue 9 gred 0.002/7/21/0.1 ${fwcmd} add 790 queue 10 log logamount 10 tcp from any to 192.168.0.99/32 out via rl0 ${fwcmd} queue 25 config pipe 1 weight 30 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff buckets 15 queue 10 gred 0.002/7/21/0.1 ${fwcmd} queue 20 config pipe 1 weight 100 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff buckets 100 queue 9 gred 0.002/7/21/0.1 ${fwcmd} queue 30 config pipe 1 weight 20 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff buckets 100 queue 9 gred 0.002/7/21/0.1 ${fwcmd} queue 40 config pipe 1 weight 10 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff buckets 100 queue 9 gred 0.002/7/21/0.1 ${fwcmd} add 891 queue 20 log logamount 10 tcp from any 5190 to 192.168.0.1/25 out via rl0 ${fwcmd} add 892 queue 25 log logamount 10 tcp from any to 192.168.0.6 out via rl0 ${fwcmd} add 893 queue 25 log logamount 10 tcp from any to 192.168.0.29 out via rl0 ${fwcmd} add 894 queue 25 log logamount 10 tcp from any to 192.168.0.62 out via rl0 ${fwcmd} add 895 queue 25 log logamount 10 tcp from any to 192.168.0.27 out via rl0 ${fwcmd} add 898 queue 30 log logamount 10 tcp from any 25,110,43,53,119,123,143,953 to 192.168.0.1/25{1-3,5,7-26,28,31-61,63-98,100} out via rl0 ${fwcmd} add 897 queue 40 log logamount 10 tcp from any 80,443,3128,21,20 to 192.168.0.1/25{1-3,5,7-26,28,31-61,63-98,100} out via rl0 ipfw pipe show: 00001: 99.000 Kbit/s 0 ms 10 KB 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0x00000000/0x0000 q00004: weight 1 pipe 1 9 sl. 1 queues (10 buckets) GRED w_q 0.001999 min_th 7 max_th 21 max_p 0.099991 mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0xffffffff/0x0000 BKT Prot ___Source IP/port____ ____Dest. IP/port____ Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 2 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.30/0 2198 1821083 0 0 43 q00010: weight 100 pipe 1 9 sl. 1 queues (64 buckets) GRED w_q 0.001999 min_th 7 max_th 21 max_p 0.099991 mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0xffffffff/0x0000 BKT Prot ___Source IP/port____ ____Dest. IP/port____ Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 51 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.99/0 9 813 0 0 0 q00020: weight 100 pipe 1 9 sl. 13 queues (100 buckets) GRED w_q 0.001999 min_th 7 max_th 21 max_p 0.099991 mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0xffffffff/0x0000 BKT Prot ___Source IP/port____ ____Dest. IP/port____ Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 2 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.30/0 42 6662 0 0 0 5 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.1/0 36 6054 0 0 0 13 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.9/0 37 5021 0 0 0 15 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.11/0 61 16333 0 0 0 25 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.53/0 23 3463 0 0 0 29 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.85/0 201 23807 0 0 0 33 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.61/0 65 6704 0 0 0 34 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.62/0 166 39971 0 0 0 38 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.94/0 36 7726 0 0 0 39 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.35/0 151 62681 0 0 0 47 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.71/0 207 17475 0 0 0 88 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.16/0 25 4751 0 0 0 98 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.26/0 44 8235 0 0 0 q00025: weight 30 pipe 1 10 sl. 2 queues (15 buckets) GRED w_q 0.001999 min_th 7 max_th 21 max_p 0.099991 mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0xffffffff/0x0000 BKT Prot ___Source IP/port____ ____Dest. IP/port____ Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 5 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.6/0 1093 518028 0 0 51 14 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.62/0 3604 2254945 4 3098 50 q00030: weight 20 pipe 1 9 sl. 8 queues (100 buckets) GRED w_q 0.001999 min_th 7 max_th 21 max_p 0.099991 mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0xffffffff/0x0000 BKT Prot ___Source IP/port____ ____Dest. IP/port____ Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 15 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.11/0 20 1081 0 0 0 33 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.61/0 142 24203 0 0 0 38 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.94/0 21 1008 0 0 0 39 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.35/0 21 3090 0 0 0 53 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.77/0 848 38982 0 0 0 90 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.18/0 233 149963 0 0 0 97 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.25/0 262 40407 0 0 0 98 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.26/0 15 4205 0 0 0 q00040: weight 10 pipe 1 9 sl. 14 queues (100 buckets) GRED w_q 0.001999 min_th 7 max_th 21 max_p 0.099991 mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0xffffffff/0x0000 BKT Prot ___Source IP/port____ ____Dest. IP/port____ Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 15 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.11/0 1395 1158072 0 0 17 18 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.14/0 453 53758 0 0 9 26 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.82/0 106 127901 0 0 0 29 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.85/0 107 82636 0 0 0 33 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.61/0 561 577903 0 0 0 35 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.91/0 567 635678 0 0 0 38 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.94/0 68 56742 0 0 1 39 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.35/0 365 314405 0 0 28 43 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.39/0 4951 2412776 0 0 122 45 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.69/0 920 128301 0 0 0 47 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.71/0 1034 334595 0 0 5 53 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.77/0 352 288702 0 0 0 90 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.18/0 5951 4674530 0 0 317 98 ip 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.26/0 766 676891 0 0 0 And with these settings flows that have higher weights get lower bandwidth sometimes... And become very angry... Could anyone please get simplest configuration appropriate for this environment? Thanks a lot! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 10:27:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534B616A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:27:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3AE43D53 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:27:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barno@amadeus.demon.nl) Received: from amadeus.demon.nl ([82.161.18.200]:56271 helo=[10.0.1.1]) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJ7kS-000MsI-LS; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:27:01 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200504052022.06405.silverback011@yahoo.com> References: <200504052022.06405.silverback011@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <942f2242ff6e64633d3dcf34e52f419a@amadeus.demon.nl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Barno Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:26:57 +0200 To: Chuck Teal X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unusual dmesg output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:27:02 -0000 Hi Chuck On 06 apr 2005, at 02:22, Chuck Teal wrote: > I saw this roll by the screen on bootup. It came up 2X during the > boot up > process. What does it mean? It is something to be worried about? > I had this too some times ago when i first started playing with sysctl settings set at boot time I think i had: sysctl kermaxfiles=2448 in /etc/sysctl.conf in stead of just: kermaxfiles=2448 this sysctl command will show all these settings at the time of boot. You probably have something similar. Arno > I have not noticed any problems with my system. It just bothers me not > knowing what this is about. > > > Here is a portion of the output. > > > 534 numposzaps R *Handler > 535 numposhits R *Handler > 536 numnegzaps R *Handler > 537 numneghits R *Handler > 538 nchstats R *Handler Opaque/struct > 543 numcwdcalls R *Handler > 544 numcwdfail1 R *Handler > 545 numcwdfail2 R *Handler > 546 numcwdfail3 R *Handler > 547 numcwdfail4 R *Handler > 548 numcwdfound R *Handler > 550 numfullpathcalls R *Handler > 551 numfullpathfail1 R *Handler > 552 numfullpathfail2 R *Handler > 553 numfullpathfail3 R *Handler > 554 numfullpathfail4 R *Handler > 555 numfullpathfound R *Handler > 556 write_behind RW *Handler Int > 557 read_max RW *Handler Int > 558 opv_numops R *Handler Int > 559 usermount RW *Handler Int > 561 numvnodes R *Handler > 562 wantfreevnodes RW *Handler > 563 freevnodes R *Handler > 564 reassignbufcalls RW *Handler Int > 565 nameileafonly RW *Handler Int > 572 timestamp_precision RW *Handler Int > 573 worklist_len R *Handler Int > 574 conflist R *Handler > 575 ctl W *Handler > 685 ffs RW Node > 1 adjrefcnt W *Handler Opaque/struct > 2 adjblkcnt W *Handler Node > 3 freeblks W *Handler Node > 4 freedirs W *Handler Node > 5 freefiles W *Handler Node > 6 setflags W *Handler Node > 686 doasyncfree RW *Handler Int > 687 doreallocblks RW *Handler Int > 4 net RW Node > 1 local RW Node > 1 stream RW Node > 483 sendspace RW *Handler Int > 484 recvspace RW *Handler Int > 489 pcblist R *Handler > 2 dgram RW Node > 485 maxdgram RW *Handler Int > 486 recvspace RW *Handler Int > 488 pcblist R *Handler > 487 inflight R *Handler Int > 2 inet RW Node > 0 ip RW Node > 0 portrange RW Node > 605 lowfirst RW *Handler Int > 606 lowlast RW *Handler Int > 607 first RW *Handler Int > 608 last RW *Handler Int > 609 hifirst RW *Handler Int > 610 hilast RW *Handler Int > 611 reservedhigh RW *Handler Int > 612 reservedlow RW *Handler Int > 613 randomized RW *Handler Int > 1 forwarding RW *Handler Int > 2 redirect RW *Handler Int > 3 ttl RW *Handler Int > 5 rtexpire RW *Handler Int > 6 rtminexpire RW *Handler Int > 7 rtmaxcache RW *Handler Int > 8 sourceroute RW *Handler Int > 10 intr_queue_maxlen RW *Handler Int > 11 intr_queue_drops R *Handler Int > 12 stats RW *Handler Opaque/struct > 13 accept_sourceroute RW *Handler Int > 15 keepfaith RW *Handler Int > 16 gifttl RW *Handler Int > 604 subnets_are_local RW *Handler Int > 614 fastforwarding RW *Handler Int > 621 process_options RW *Handler Int > 622 maxfragpackets RW *Handler Int > 623 maxfragsperpacket RW *Handler Int > 624 sendsourcequench RW *Handler Int > 625 random_id RW *Handler Int > 626 check_interface RW *Handler Int > 1 icmp RW Node > 1 maskrepl RW *Handler Int > 2 stats RW *Handler Opaque/struct > 3 icmplim RW *Handler Int > 615 maskfake RW *Handler > 616 drop_redirect RW *Handler Int > 617 log_redirect RW *Handler Int > 618 icmplim_output RW *Handler Int > 619 reply_src RW *Handler String > 620 bmcastecho RW *Handler Int > 2 igmp RW Node > 1 stats RW *Handler Opaque/struct > 6 tcp RW Node > 1 rfc1323 RW *Handler Int > 2 rfc1644 RW *Handler Int > 3 mssdflt RW *Handler Int > 4 stats RW *Handler Opaque/struct > 6 keepidle RW *Handler Int > 7 keepintvl RW *Handler Int > 8 sendspace RW *Handler Int > 9 recvspace RW *Handler Int > 10 keepinit RW *Handler Int > 11 pcblist R *Handler > 12 delacktime RW *Handler Int > 13 v6mssdflt RW *Handler Int > 630 hostcache RW Node > 631 cachelimit R *Handler Int > 632 hashsize R *Handler Int > 633 bucketlimit R *Handler Int > 634 count R *Handler Int > 635 expire RW *Handler Int > 636 purge RW *Handler Int > 637 list R *Handler String > 638 log_in_vain RW *Handler Int > 639 blackhole RW *Handler Int > 640 delayed_ack RW *Handler Int > 641 rfc3042 RW *Handler Int > 642 rfc3390 RW *Handler Int > 643 reass RW Node > 644 maxsegments R *Handler Int > 645 cursegments R *Handler Int > 646 maxqlen RW *Handler Int > 647 overflows R *Handler Int > 648 path_mtu_discovery RW *Handler Int > 649 slowstart_flightsize RW *Handler Int > 650 local_slowstart_flightsize RW *Handler Int > 651 newreno RW *Handler Int > 652 minmss RW *Handler Int > 653 minmssoverload RW *Handler Int > 654 tcbhashsize R *Handler Int > 655 do_tcpdrain RW *Handler Int > 656 pcbcount R *Handler Int > 657 icmp_may_rst RW *Handler Int > 658 isn_reseed_interval RW *Handler Int > 659 inflight RW Node > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 11:29:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766A516A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:29:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vscan41.melbpc.org.au (eagle.melbpc.org.au [203.12.152.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB4143D58 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:29:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabpaul@numbat.melbpc.org.au) Received: from virusscan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vscan41.melbpc.org.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 68C809D05 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:29:05 +1000 (EST) Received: from vscan41.melbpc.org.au ([127.0.0.1]) by eagle.melbpc.org.au ([203.12.152.41]) with SMTP (gateway) id A0413E66DBE; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:29:05 +1000 Received: by vscan41.melbpc.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 379169D0A; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:29:05 +1000 (EST) Received: from a2-6.melbpc.org.au (a2-6.melbpc.org.au [203.12.157.6]) by vscan41.melbpc.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A829BC2 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:29:03 +1000 (EST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:29:02 +1000 From: "Gabrielle Harrison & Paul van den Bergen" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera M2/7.50 (Win32, build 3778) X-Filtered-With: renattach 1.2.1 X-RenAttach-Info: mode=badlist action=rename count=0 Subject: difficulty installing 5.3-R i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: gabpaul@melbpc.org.au List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:29:08 -0000 Hi all, I have an old old pentium, scsi HDD + floppy + CDROM, 16 MB of somewhat dubious ram... I have 5.3R CDs 1 and 2 I have 3 seemingly working floppies (after writing to 6 disks... ofcourse!) boot goes like this... boot disk. kern1 kern2 boot boot screen with about 8 options, none of which seem to be the installation option... then reboots back to floppy... I do not seem to have a way of getting to sysinstall!!! -- ########## Paul van den Bergen, #### # Gabrielle Harrison # # # & Anja van den Bergen # #### # 848 High Street Rd #### # # Glen Waverley VIC 3150 Australia # ###### gabpaul@melbpc.org.au # # ph: +613 9886 3160 ##### mob: 042 886 3160 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 11:34:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FB616A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:34:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av9-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (av9-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C70B43D39 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:34:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: by av9-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 11A28382C0; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:34:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.181]) by av9-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DC03825F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:34:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.201]) by smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id B843737E46 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:34:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 33205 invoked by uid 1001); 6 Apr 2005 11:34:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:34:01 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: gabpaul@melbpc.org.au Message-ID: <20050406113401.GA33178@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: gabpaul@melbpc.org.au, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: difficulty installing 5.3-R i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:34:04 -0000 On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 09:29:02PM +1000, Gabrielle Harrison & Paul van den Bergen wrote: > Hi all, > > I have an old old pentium, scsi HDD + floppy + CDROM, 16 MB of somewhat > dubious ram... I don't think 16MB RAM is enough to install 5.x You probably need to increase the RAM. > > I have 5.3R CDs 1 and 2 > > I have 3 seemingly working floppies (after writing to 6 disks... ofcourse!) > > boot goes like this... > > boot disk. > kern1 > kern2 > boot > boot screen with about 8 options, none of which seem to be the > installation option... then reboots back to floppy... > > > I do not seem to have a way of getting to sysinstall!!! > > -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 11:41:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A8716A4CE; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:41:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postino-2.etat.lu (postino-2.etat.lu [194.154.205.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6433943D5A; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:41:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu) Received: from avirus-2.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-2.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.7]) by postino-2.etat.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0651113BC4; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:41:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from avirus-2.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-2.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.7]) by localhost (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 2) with ESMTP id 2F599356AC; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:41:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by dispatch-2.cie.etat.lu (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 2) with ESMTP id 1C2C63567A; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:41:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEI0037RWHG0650@store.etat.lu>; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:41:41 +0200 (MEST) Received: from LUCY ([148.110.43.189]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEI00FU4WE21B00@store.etat.lu>; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:41:40 +0200 (MEST) Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:39:39 +0200 From: Didier Wiroth In-reply-to: <1112743101.1257.11.camel@genius2.i.cz> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-id: <0IEI00FU6WHG1B00@store.etat.lu> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcU6NcOlxwuUAjKbRdGehHC2I27fFAAZNfAQ cc: delphij@freebsd.org Subject: RE: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:41:43 -0000 Hi, I've updated the vidcontrol sources to those in the current cvs and was able to compile and install the patch on stable. High resolution console is fantastic have 1400x1050 (MODE_322) on my laptop now. I get an "pfctl -sa", on one screen ... amazing :-)) It does make freebsd so much better ... I would be great to integrate these patches in future releases, please! The mouse actually works without problem in the console but I've a small mouse bug after a reboot. I assume the /etc/rc.d/mouse script needs a tiny patch. After a reboot and while launching the different services/daemon, there are about 10 lines of vidcontrol errors. Here a sample output: vidcontrol: showing the mouse: invalid argument Is there a patch available for the rc.d mouse script? Thank you Didier >I believe Didier used broken vidcontrol.c file. The patch was for current and needs to be applied to clean vidcontrol.c >ver 1.48. >It works for me (on CURRENT anyways). >Michal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 11:47:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7D516A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:47:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.vibrators.ru (mail.vibrators.ru [83.102.249.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DA743D1F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:47:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-maillists@vibrators.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.vibrators.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25288C130; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:47:50 +0400 (MSD) Received: from mail.vibrators.ru ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vibrators.ru [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41615-03; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:47:31 +0400 (MSD) Received: from asu-reaper (vlan101-sv-yar03ra.severttk.ru [80.92.2.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.vibrators.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:47:31 +0400 (MSD) Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:47:32 +0400 From: "Michael Lednev" To: "Erik Trulsson" References: <20050406113401.GA33178@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=koi8-r MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20050406113401.GA33178@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> User-Agent: Opera M2(BETA2)/8.0 (Linux, build 987) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vibrators.ru cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: difficulty installing 5.3-R i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:47:46 -0000 On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:34:01 +0400, Erik Trulsson wrote: >> I have an old old pentium, scsi HDD + floppy + CDROM, 16 MB of somewhat >> dubious ram... > > I don't think 16MB RAM is enough to install 5.x > You probably need to increase the RAM. strange, i've got the same error and it was gone after adding another 8 mb of ram after install i removed them back and system works on 16 mb without errors. is this normal? -- Best Regards, Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 12:03:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B6E16A4CE; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:03:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rtl.org (rtl-3.i2k.com [66.255.200.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9535443D45; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:03:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jstewart@rtl.org) Received: from mis3c.rtl.lan (rtl-2.i2k.com [66.255.200.206]) by mail.rtl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0B530AB4; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:01:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Jason Stewart To: Ean Kingston In-Reply-To: <200504051850.33281.ean@hedron.org> References: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> <200504051850.33281.ean@hedron.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Right to Life of Michigan Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:04:42 -0400 Message-Id: <1112789082.28348.5.camel@mis3c.rtl.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suspending login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:03:28 -0000 On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 18:50 -0400, Ean Kingston wrote: > On April 5, 2005 06:42 pm, Bob Ababurko wrote: > > Hello all- > > > > I am trying to figure out how to suspend a login for a user. Do I have > > to do this with password aging or is there an easier(read brute force) > > way to disallow a user from logging in? > > the safest way is to set the shell to /sbin/nologin and the home directory > to /nonexistant in your auth system. The latter is especially needed if you > allow ssh for remote login since the public-key authentication mechanisms > sometimes bypass the normal login restrictions. > Am I mistaken here, or will doing that only deny the user a shell and home directory? The user will still be able to authenticate against the password database right? To the best of my knowledge the "correct" way of doing this is either the asterisk method in the password field using vipw or the more user friendly way of using pw(8) with the lock command. Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 12:03:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B6E16A4CE; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:03:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rtl.org (rtl-3.i2k.com [66.255.200.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9535443D45; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:03:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jstewart@rtl.org) Received: from mis3c.rtl.lan (rtl-2.i2k.com [66.255.200.206]) by mail.rtl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0B530AB4; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:01:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Jason Stewart To: Ean Kingston In-Reply-To: <200504051850.33281.ean@hedron.org> References: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> <200504051850.33281.ean@hedron.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Right to Life of Michigan Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:04:42 -0400 Message-Id: <1112789082.28348.5.camel@mis3c.rtl.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suspending login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:03:28 -0000 On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 18:50 -0400, Ean Kingston wrote: > On April 5, 2005 06:42 pm, Bob Ababurko wrote: > > Hello all- > > > > I am trying to figure out how to suspend a login for a user. Do I have > > to do this with password aging or is there an easier(read brute force) > > way to disallow a user from logging in? > > the safest way is to set the shell to /sbin/nologin and the home directory > to /nonexistant in your auth system. The latter is especially needed if you > allow ssh for remote login since the public-key authentication mechanisms > sometimes bypass the normal login restrictions. > Am I mistaken here, or will doing that only deny the user a shell and home directory? The user will still be able to authenticate against the password database right? To the best of my knowledge the "correct" way of doing this is either the asterisk method in the password field using vipw or the more user friendly way of using pw(8) with the lock command. Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 12:09:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2534F16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:09:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07B343D5F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:09:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from blackice_101@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153])id j36C97vU003646 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:09:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.18.250.175] (c-24-18-250-175.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [24.18.250.175]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin08/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j36C94eE028025 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:09:07 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <541e4094dee7008debc7d7b53351212a@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Alex Alpisa Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:09:03 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) Subject: image: ive got your os right here? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:09:08 -0000 i realize this is a bit of a trivial and semi-topical trivial post and I apologize, but does anyone remember seeing a image of a parody of the Rosie the Riveter posters that had been converted to a bsd promo with something like "I've got your os right here!" Does anyone happen to have this image saved somewhere?? I remember seeing it somewhere and haven't been able to find it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 12:27:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EF116A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:27:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av7-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (av7-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540D243D45 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:27:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: by av7-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 2BCE738266; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:27:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.181]) by av7-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1760137E5D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:27:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.201]) by smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D513337E48 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:27:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 33715 invoked by uid 1001); 6 Apr 2005 12:27:21 -0000 Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:27:21 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Michael Lednev Message-ID: <20050406122721.GA33679@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Lednev , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050406113401.GA33178@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: difficulty installing 5.3-R i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:27:24 -0000 On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:47:32PM +0400, Michael Lednev wrote: > On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:34:01 +0400, Erik Trulsson > wrote: > > >>I have an old old pentium, scsi HDD + floppy + CDROM, 16 MB of somewhat > >>dubious ram... > > > >I don't think 16MB RAM is enough to install 5.x > >You probably need to increase the RAM. > > strange, i've got the same error and it was gone after adding another 8 mb > of ram > after install i removed them back and system works on 16 mb without > errors. is this > normal? Yes, that is normal. After installation you have got a swap configured and the system can use it if the physical RAM is not sufficient. During installation you do not have any swap available and therefore the RAM must be large enough to fit everything in it at once. If you really wanted to you could almost certainly *run* (but not install) 5.3 with only 8 MB RAM (at least if you had a customized kernel) but I wouldn't recommend it. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 12:45:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B773F16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:45:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.vibrators.ru (mail.vibrators.ru [83.102.249.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A3643D1F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:45:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-maillists@vibrators.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.vibrators.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B65C176; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:45:07 +0400 (MSD) Received: from mail.vibrators.ru ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vibrators.ru [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42076-07; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:44:49 +0400 (MSD) Received: from asu-reaper (vlan101-sv-yar03ra.severttk.ru [80.92.2.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.vibrators.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:44:49 +0400 (MSD) To: "Erik Trulsson" References: <20050406113401.GA33178@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <20050406122721.GA33679@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Message-ID: Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:44:48 +0400 From: "Michael Lednev" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=koi8-r MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20050406113401.GA33178@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> User-Agent: Opera M2(BETA2)/8.0 (Linux, build 987) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vibrators.ru cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: difficulty installing 5.3-R i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:45:03 -0000 On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:27:21 +0400, Erik Trulsson wrote: > Yes, that is normal. After installation you have got a swap configured > and the system can use it if the physical RAM is not sufficient. > During installation you do not have any swap available and therefore > the RAM must be large enough to fit everything in it at once. > > If you really wanted to you could almost certainly *run* (but not > install) 5.3 with only 8 MB RAM (at least if you had a customized > kernel) but I wouldn't recommend it. that's not completely true. when i ran install on 16 mb system rebooted at boot loader start (i didn't saw beastie :) ), and after install it loads ok -- Best Regards, Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 13:10:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CCC16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:10:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBB143D1F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:10:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E2460E4; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:10:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51532-01; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:10:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EDA60DB; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:10:27 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4253DFD9.4060400@makeworld.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:10:49 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050327) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manuel Manuel References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6-CURRENT installation from boot cd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:10:34 -0000 Manuel Manuel wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm looking for a 6-CURRENT bootonly CD image. > > http://www.freebsd.org/where.html ... tells me the following: > > "If you're interested in a purely experimental snapshot release of > FreeBSD-CURRENT (AKA 6.0-CURRENT), aimed at developers and bleeding-edge > testers only, then please see the daily snapshot server FTP site." > > Unfortunately I didn't find an appropriate image there. > > ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/ISO-IMAGES/00SNAPSHOTS_CD_README > > > The readme file above, does not mention the 6-CURRENT release and > everything > on this server looks quite old to me. Am I looking at the wrong place? > > Where can I find a bootonly cd image which lets me boot with it and > download > a 6-CURRENT snapshot via FTP? If there does not exist something like > that, what > is the best and recommended way to install a 6-CURRENT release? (Yes, I > want > to develop on this machine if someone is going to ask me that.) > > If someone could point me in the right direction it would be greatly > appreciated. > > Thanks. You need to subscribe to the FreeBSD-Current list for questions like this. Next, on the FBSD site, on the right side, seek Snapshot Releases. It only takes a little thinking and reading of the site. -- Best regards, Chris If there are only two shows worth watching, they will be on together. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 13:13:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B84416A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:13:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF8D43D53 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:13:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1D760F3; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:13:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51485-03; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:12:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324A360E7; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:12:56 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4253E06F.4060602@makeworld.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:13:19 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050327) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manuel Manuel References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6-CURRENT installation from boot cd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:13:02 -0000 Manuel Manuel wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm looking for a 6-CURRENT bootonly CD image. > > http://www.freebsd.org/where.html ... tells me the following: > > "If you're interested in a purely experimental snapshot release of > FreeBSD-CURRENT (AKA 6.0-CURRENT), aimed at developers and bleeding-edge > testers only, then please see the daily snapshot server FTP site." > > Unfortunately I didn't find an appropriate image there. > > ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/ISO-IMAGES/00SNAPSHOTS_CD_README > > > The readme file above, does not mention the 6-CURRENT release and > everything > on this server looks quite old to me. Am I looking at the wrong place? > > Where can I find a bootonly cd image which lets me boot with it and > download > a 6-CURRENT snapshot via FTP? If there does not exist something like > that, what > is the best and recommended way to install a 6-CURRENT release? (Yes, I > want > to develop on this machine if someone is going to ask me that.) > > If someone could point me in the right direction it would be greatly > appreciated. > > Thanks. But - in answer to you, and via what I posted: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/Mar_2005/ See? It's not hard if you simply read. -- Best regards, Chris Before ordering a test decide what you will do if it is, (1) positive, or (2) negative. If both answers are the same, don't do the test. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 13:28:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321EA16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:28:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-04.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2D8B43D41 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:27:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: (qmail 13086 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2005 13:27:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warren.shinji.nq.nu) (203.217.81.22) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 6 Apr 2005 13:27:58 -0000 From: Warren To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:26:04 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504062326.05136.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Subject: ad* read errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:28:01 -0000 since i updated the ports/src/kernel 2 days ago i have had the followings error splague me .. are these related or am i looking at hdd failure ? ======================== ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=1519103 ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=5266559 ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=5266559 ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=15383527 ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=1484415 ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=25769279 ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=5126031 ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=25089095 ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=26332807 ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=26332807 ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=115046303 ad1: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=189786975 -- Yours Sincerely Shinjii http://www.shinji.nq.nu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 13:28:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5413116A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:28:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54003.mail.yahoo.com (web54003.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C311343D49 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:28:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 87944 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Apr 2005 13:28:33 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=A43V70OfAROj0wBafks85tjq++Sghw1VM/zl84F/yLFmyo3886BN7uNe/tU/jYKptZp2FIew32xSWXMpuB7AuF0Bqie9tejubv6qQJma7hLWNmlMRXVmOLh73B6obpYxX1Puf4E1CP7+UorTXBCYzFEzaRKRYByrR1tsM3325Vk= ; Message-ID: <20050406132833.87942.qmail@web54003.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [147.46.44.181] by web54003.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 06:28:32 PDT Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 06:28:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Rob To: FreeBSD questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Procmail: how to deliver email over an ssh-tunnel to my smtp server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:28:34 -0000 Rob wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having 4.11 and 5.3 FreeBSD PCs. > > All incoming email arrives through fetchmail (using > imap protocol). > > I then filter all email with procmail, which is > configured such that it > trashes spam, or > delivers to local mailbox, or > forwards to another external address. > > For external delivery, I have set up an ssh tunnel > to my smtp server: > > ssh -N -f -L 2525:localhost:25 smtp.server.it > > What do I have to do next, to have the delivery > work properly? > > Can I tell procmail to push the email directly onto > the port 2525 of the ssh tunnel? > > Or do I have to reconfigure sendmail for this? > (sendmail reconfiguration info looks like a > nightmare to me though....). > > Do I have other options? I'll answer my own question here, just for the record. Use msmtp, which is highly configurable, for example defining its own outgoing port. In the .procmailrc file I only need to add: :0 | /usr/local/bin/msmtp email@address.com to forward the email with msmtp, over my own ssh tunnel port. Works like a charm. Rob. __________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 13:28:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D717F16A4DA for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:28:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB52943D53 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:28:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DJAVn-00056f-L0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:24:03 +0200 Received: from dsl092-076-225.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.76.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:24:03 +0200 Received: from jdarnold by dsl092-076-225.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:24:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jonathan Arnold Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:23:03 -0400 Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <42528039.1010708@tiscali.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dsl092-076-225.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050202 MultiZilla/1.7.0.2d X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, ja In-Reply-To: <42528039.1010708@tiscali.co.uk> Sender: news Subject: Re: .iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:28:38 -0000 bertybadboy wrote: > Which .iso files do i download and burn onto a cd? I was all set with a big explanation of what the ISOs were, and to complain that there wasn't a nice, easy to find, concise description in the handbook, when I actually looked for it and found it with no problem. The place to start, of course, when installing FreeBSD is Chapter Two in the handbook, entitled, appropriately enough, "Installing FreeBSD": http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install.html As part of section 2.2, "Pre-installation Tasks", there is section 2.2.6 "Obtain the FreeBSD Installation Files". And it points you to section 2.13 "Preparing Your Own Installation Media": http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-diff-media.html And that has an excellent and concise description of the ISO files. The gist of that is you should download the -miniinst version (not the -mini version as described in the handbook) if you have a fast internet connection and want to install the packages online, or the -disc1 version if you want to have a CD with it prepackage. The biggest advantage to using the miniinst version is that you are sure to get the latest version of the package, while the -disc1 version is what was available when the ISO was created. Hope this helps. -- Jonathan Arnold (mailto:jdarnold@buddydog.org) Daemon Dancing in the Dark, a FreeBSD weblog: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 13:35:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A2716A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:35:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.notarius.org (smtp.notarius.org [207.253.43.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACAC43D1D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:35:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.robillard@notarius.com) Received: from paris.notarius.lan ([172.25.1.48]) by smtp.notarius.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:35:53 -0400 Received: from paris.notarius.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by paris.notarius.lan (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j36DaqcY050146; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:36:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from drobilla@paris.notarius.lan) Received: (from drobilla@localhost) by paris.notarius.lan (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j36DalCe050145; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:36:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from drobilla) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:36:47 -0400 From: David Robillard To: Bob Ababurko Message-ID: <20050406133647.GA50102@paris.notarius.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2005 13:35:53.0776 (UTC) FILETIME=[8E1A2B00:01C53AAD] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Ean Kingston Subject: Re: suspending login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:35:55 -0000 What you need is nologin(5). Check nologin(5) and nologin(8) man pages. As the nologin(8) man page says: To disable all logins, investigate nologin(5) David On April 5, 2005 06:42 pm, Bob Ababurko wrote: > Hello all- > > I am trying to figure out how to suspend a login for a user. Do I > have to do this with password aging or is there an easier(read brute > force) way to disallow a user from logging in? -- David Robillard UNIX systems administrator david.robillard@notarius.com Notarius (TSIN) Inc. 465, rue St-Jean, suite 200 Montreal, Quebec, H2Y 2R6 Tel. : +1 514 966 0122 Fax. : +1 514 281 1226 http://www.notarius.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 13:45:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6EF16A4CE; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:45:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postino-1.etat.lu (postino-1.etat.lu [194.154.205.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C34A43D2D; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:45:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu) Received: from avirus-1.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.6]) by postino-1.etat.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825EE13E27C3; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:45:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from avirus-1.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.6]) by localhost (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 1) with ESMTP id 8480C21318; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:45:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 1) with ESMTP id 722942103C; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:45:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEJ003K527E0380@store.etat.lu>; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:45:14 +0200 (MEST) Received: from LUCY ([148.110.43.189]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEJ00F4Y27B1460@store.etat.lu>; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:45:14 +0200 (MEST) Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:45:12 +0200 From: Didier Wiroth In-reply-to: To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <0IEJ00F5027E1460@store.etat.lu> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcU6qHauAxM84wdsQKWcqfzfrkrm0QAAEfSw Subject: RE: vesa 1024x768 mode in future version? to the freebsd community X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:45:17 -0000 Hello, Yes, I do agree that stability is "the" major argument for not using it. But isn't it worth to have a high resolution console on freebsd? Sorry, to be a bit self-confident ;-) but I'm rather sure that hundreds/thousands of freebsd would use it (on laptop, workstation and servers) if there would be an available solid implementation. One of the main arguments I've always reread, is, when you are physically at the console and require high definition consoles, "use X". On servers, security is "the" main factor and of course stability is part of good security. I personally don't tend to install X on servers, I'm sure there are other much better freebsd admins than me that don't install X on servers. Most security-related paper do not recommand to install X (and compilers of course etc). So at least on these kind of servers a high resolution (and of course) stable/solid console would be a real step forward for freebsd. In my "NON"-specialist opinion, comparing to linux distributions, it is the only main feature that bsd lacks. I personally don't like linux (but this is another discussion) but I've always missed the higher definition consoles on freebsd and/or even openbsd. Didier -----Original Message----- From: Robert Backhaus [mailto:robbak@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 14:59 To: Didier Wiroth Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vesa 1024x768 mode in future version? to the freebsd community On Apr 6, 2005 5:12 AM, Didier Wiroth wrote: > > I was wondering if the patches (see link below) have any chances to make their ways into a future release version or may be in the ports collection? I agree that it would make life more enjoyable for some people, but the console is increasingly a fail-safe debugging/configuring interface, as more people use X for any work. Yes, I would use it myself in places, especially laptops, but I would not like it there if it possibly made the console less stable. It would want to be very well tested. I'd slate it for 6.Stable, when it occours. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 13:45:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5020516A4CF for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:45:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.100.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0121B43D2D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:45:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j36DjIY5035139 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:45:18 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200504061345.j36DjIY5035139@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:45:18 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Bourn Shell Scripts that Produce Multiple Files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:45:19 -0000 Mario Hoerich writes: >This sounds a bit like a truncation issue. > >If you do something like > > command1 > bar > # some code > command2 > bar > >then the second redirect will truncate the file to 0 bytes >before redirecting the output from command2 into it. Yes. My code was very similar to what you describe only more like: command1 > bar #some code command2 > bar2 #should leave bar alone and open bar2 #Instead, bar and bar2 both end up empty of anything. >Try using >> instead of >, as it appends to the file. What's sad is, I think I tried that but forgot to remove some older versions of the same files created by a less elegant method so it looked like the new files had too many lines in them and I figured that appending didn't work either. I should have cleaned house first and things would have been fine. Appending did solve the problem. >If this doesn't help, please post the script (or a simplified >version thereof). We're not clairvoyant, you know... :) Here is the simplified origin of the problem: #! /bin/sh searchfor () { #line of awk that produces standard output return 0 } while read currentnumber; do #This line does work according to your suggestion. searchfor >>$currentnumber.txt #This line was what I had which opens new files but never fills them: #searchfor >$currentnumber.txt done <~/numbers The value held in $currentnumber.txt changes with each loop iteration so we should be writing to bar2, bar3, etc and leaving bar1 alone. It apparently does not work that way. It reminds me of what happens in C if a program ends without closing an open file for whatever reason. The buffer never gets emptied so the file is left either empty or partially filled depending upon luck and how much data got written to the disk before the abnormal end. My short-term problem is solved so thanks again, but it appears that even opening new files without appending them confuses the shell on previously-opened files such that you do not receive any data in any of the files. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK OSU Information Technology Division Network Operations Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 13:49:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FE116A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:49:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D828243D41 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:49:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from free.bsd@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Apr 2005 13:49:23 -0000 Received: from pD9E7ED36.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.2.101]) [217.231.237.54] by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 06 Apr 2005 15:49:23 +0200 X-Authenticated: #20105305 Message-ID: <4253EBB4.6040706@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 22:01:24 +0800 From: FreeBSD Deamon User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: WLAN card --> chip used list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:49:26 -0000 dear list, i once came across a list on the web (i think maintained by the linux community) which listed the chip used on the wireless cards on the market. unfortunatelly i cannot remember the url ... can someone help me? TIA zheyu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 13:59:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE8016A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:59:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D12D43D48 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:59:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Apr 2005 13:59:18 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de) [62.245.232.135] by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 06 Apr 2005 15:59:18 +0200 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:58:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <36f5bbba050406001514562df7@mail.gmail.com> <4253B4CE.6070504@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <4253B4CE.6070504@locolomo.org> X-Birthday: 10/06/72 X-CelPhone: +49 173 9967781 X-Tel: +49 89 18947781 X-Country: Germany X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-OS: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4336981.YMkWjLiIfv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504061559.04397@harrymail> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: "Edwin D. Vinas" Subject: Re: too many illegal connection attempts through ssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:59:23 -0000 --nextPart4336981.YMkWjLiIfv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Mittwoch, 6. April 2005 12:07 schrieb Erik N=F8rgaard: > Edwin D. Vinas wrote: > > shown below is snapshot of too many illegal attempts to login to my > > server from a suspicious hacker. this is taken from the > > "/var/log/auth.log". my question is, how do i automatically block an > > IP address if it is attempting to guess my login usernames? can i > > configure the firewall to check the instances a certain IP has > > attempted to access/ssh the sevrer, and if it has failed to login for > > about "x" number of attempts, it will be blocked automatically? > > This question is asked on the list ever so often - see the archives for > suggestions. These are automated attacks, they come regularly as > crackers, black hats or script kidies scan across the net. Does anybody know what robots beeing used? And on what systems? All you=20 mention later in your posting is true of course and I needn't care about=20 these logs, but it's like like somebody unknown puts 10 flyers in your=20 letterbox every night. I'm sure, one night you'll hide and build a trap for= =20 that person. I'm too lazy to enter those net-circles for finding these=20 robots, but maybe some other has already done that? =2DHarry > > You can avoid the automated scanning by chaning port, but this won't > stop the determined cracker - he will scan all your ports and identify > which services are running on which ports. > > Ask yourself a few questions: > > * Do you need to allow ssh from anywhere? If not, restrict to the > relevant ip blocks. > > * Do you need to allow password based authentication? If not, disable it > and use only ssh keys, in sshd_config: > > PasswordAuthentication no > PubkeyAuthentication yes > > * Do all users need to have ssh access? If not, restrict to specific > groups of users, in sshd_config, eg: > > AllowGroups staff > > * Is it a problem appart from the log messages? Trying to login with a > nonexistent username is usually not a problem. > > Other tips: Disable ssh1, reduce the number of simultaneous non-authen- > ticated connections, set timeouts etc. > > Cheers, Erik --nextPart4336981.YMkWjLiIfv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCU+soBylq0S4AzzwRAi4FAJ0aUw/EhRjY1g0mJpQMqfUg4aV9mgCfTc0Z 22S2qUrgjlyCDKSAzFMJBbs= =NyNb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4336981.YMkWjLiIfv-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 14:14:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FBC16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:14:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFC643D48 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:14:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from indigomoon.ca@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so291639wra for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:14:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=V3WGrYc9WtoNCeK34z3tO1eeEyPeNq2nRc2PR+DqN5GpjL5aU43ZbgKiMSslz4EUkU5M+yAKb7vFrdkgkkx+P1LMpCtF8Sg83BXMEMsAiFtu+atWhqVKw4jiM1/zzzGPElKPL4t4EOjSEtYa+YuIkqi8bA8myK7FLNjQDThfXN0= Received: by 10.54.29.26 with SMTP id c26mr668752wrc; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:14:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.14.45 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:14:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46dc360a050406071430fa3462@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:14:52 -0300 From: Don Kuzenko To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: docs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: djkuzenko@indigomoon.ca List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:14:56 -0000 Hi, I have a number of machines running FreeBSD and I would like to create a local mirror of the documentation available on the FreeBSD website. My problem is that I currently have a dial up connection (rural living :-) Is there a simple way to obtain a tarball of a mirror of the docs so that I can access the docs via a browser on my machine. I will have access to high speed for a couple of days next week so I would like to grab the info then. Better yet would be if the info is available via something like offline explorer so that I could set it to only grab updates on a regular basis. Any tips or suggestions would be greatly appreciated don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 14:18:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F93B16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:18:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2B043D1F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:18:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Luigi.Iannone@lip6.fr) Received: from tibre.lip6.fr (tibre.lip6.fr [132.227.74.2]) j36EIDqF025970 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:18:13 +0200 X-pt: isis.lip6.fr Received: from localhost (iannone@localhost) by tibre.lip6.fr (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j36EIDm18383 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:18:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:18:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Luigi Iannone To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0b2 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:18:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Scanned-By: isis.lip6.fr Subject: About MBR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:18:16 -0000 Hi all, Can you tell me if FreeBSD boot manager is able to manage darwin partitions? thanks -----------------------------------------------------------> The man who follows the crowd will usually get no further than the crowd. The man who walks alone is likely to find himself in places no one has ever been. (Alan Ashley-Pitt) ------------------------------------> Luigi Iannone - Laboratoire D'Informatique Paris 6 Address: 8, rue du Cap. Scott 75015 Paris (France) e.mail: luigi.iannone@lip6.fr Tel: +33 (0)1 44 27 71 28 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 14:26:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458A716A4CF for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:26:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65EEF43D1F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:26:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j36EPFpc024880; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:25:16 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j36EQ8T9001278; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:26:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j36EQ8PK001277; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:26:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:26:08 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: djkuzenko@indigomoon.ca Message-ID: <20050406142608.GA1246@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <46dc360a050406071430fa3462@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46dc360a050406071430fa3462@mail.gmail.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:26:12 -0000 On 2005-04-06 11:14, Don Kuzenko wrote: > Hi, > > I have a number of machines running FreeBSD and I would like to create > a local mirror of the documentation available on the FreeBSD website. > My problem is that I currently have a dial up connection (rural living > :-) > > Is there a simple way to obtain a tarball of a mirror of the docs so > that I can access the docs via a browser on my machine. If you only need HTML docs, I can build you a snapshot with a couple of formats, like FORMATS="html html-split", and upload it somewhere where you can grab it at your leisure. If you prefer copying the files yourself, you can recursively retrieve a copy of /pub/FreeBSD/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1 from one of the FTP mirrors. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 14:27:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1C016A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:27:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75A4E43D41 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:27:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from free.bsd@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Apr 2005 14:27:50 -0000 Received: from pD9E7ED36.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.2.101]) [217.231.237.54] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 06 Apr 2005 16:27:50 +0200 X-Authenticated: #20105305 Message-ID: <4253F4BC.4080000@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 22:39:56 +0800 From: FreeBSD Deamon User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: [Fwd: Re: WLAN card --> chip used list] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:27:54 -0000 On behalf of Ben Pratt: I have no idea how current/accurate the list is but I just found one that's fairly long here: http://www.linux-wlan.org/docs/wlan_adapters.html.gz Also, this probably won't get to the list because my mail server isn't set up for reverse lookup so could you please forward it on? Thanks, Ben FreeBSD Deamon wrote: > dear list, > > i once came across a list on the web (i think maintained by the linux > community) which listed the chip used on the wireless cards on the market. > unfortunatelly i cannot remember the url ... can someone help me? > > TIA > > zheyu > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 14:29:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9B416A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:29:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp806.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp806.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04BA043D2F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:29:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com) (jtinnin@pacbell.net@64.171.3.164 with login) by smtp806.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2005 14:29:45 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:29:41 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <36f5bbba050406001514562df7@mail.gmail.com> <4253B4CE.6070504@locolomo.org> <200504061559.04397@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <200504061559.04397@harrymail> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504060729.42571.krinklyfig@spymac.com> cc: Emanuel Strobl cc: "Edwin D. Vinas" Subject: Re: too many illegal connection attempts through ssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:29:46 -0000 On Wednesday 06 April 2005 06:58, Emanuel Strobl wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 6. April 2005 12:07 schrieb Erik Nørgaard: > > Edwin D. Vinas wrote: > > > shown below is snapshot of too many illegal attempts to login to > > > my server from a suspicious hacker. this is taken from the > > > "/var/log/auth.log". my question is, how do i automatically block > > > an IP address if it is attempting to guess my login usernames? > > > can i configure the firewall to check the instances a certain IP > > > has attempted to access/ssh the sevrer, and if it has failed to > > > login for about "x" number of attempts, it will be blocked > > > automatically? > > > > This question is asked on the list ever so often - see the archives > > for suggestions. These are automated attacks, they come regularly > > as crackers, black hats or script kidies scan across the net. > > Does anybody know what robots beeing used? And on what systems? All > you mention later in your posting is true of course and I needn't > care about these logs, but it's like like somebody unknown puts 10 > flyers in your letterbox every night. I'm sure, one night you'll hide > and build a trap for that person. I'm too lazy to enter those > net-circles for finding these robots, but maybe some other has > already done that? It's painfully easy to write a script which checks for the existence of ssh on all the IPs in an IP block, at least if all you're checking is port 22. A lot of these guys just write a bot which does that and sends the "live" IPs back to someone, either the originator or another bot, which then will do things like dictionary attack each one. You have tools in ports which can serve as the vehicle to do this - nmap is an oldie but a goodie. Don't misunderstand - it's also a security tool. This type of attack is pretty old, actually, it's just now more people are online on bigger pipes, so there are thousands (millions?) of zombied computers due to the more recent trojan horses and worms which are unwitting accomplices to this sort of thing. It's much harder to trace now. All you need is a bunch of zombies, maybe a proxy or three and an irc bot. You have a massive scanning machine with quite a bit of distributed computing power, which isn't easily traceable. The way to avoid it is to not be an obvious target, and not allow password logins at all. - jt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 14:37:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EF716A4D0 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:37:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDA543D31 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:37:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:40:09 -0500 Message-ID: <4253F42F.5010105@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:37:35 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Lednev References: <20050406113401.GA33178@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <20050406122721.GA33679@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2005 14:40:10.0538 (UTC) FILETIME=[88E958A0:01C53AB6] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: difficulty installing 5.3-R i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:37:39 -0000 Michael Lednev wrote: > On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:27:21 +0400, Erik Trulsson > wrote: > >> Yes, that is normal. After installation you have got a swap configured >> and the system can use it if the physical RAM is not sufficient. >> During installation you do not have any swap available and therefore >> the RAM must be large enough to fit everything in it at once. >> >> If you really wanted to you could almost certainly *run* (but not >> install) 5.3 with only 8 MB RAM (at least if you had a customized >> kernel) but I wouldn't recommend it. > > > that's not completely true. when i ran install on 16 mb system > rebooted at > boot loader start (i didn't saw beastie :) ), and after install it > loads ok > I think you misunderstood. In order to get sysinstall and the kernel from the install floppies up, modules and all, you need greater than 16MB system RAM. The Doc team was in the process of addressing this in the documentation recently, but I've not read the update doc yet, so I don't know if it's been done.* Erik's point is that an *installed* system could be slimmed down to the point of possibly working with 8MB system RAM by configuring and building a very tiny *custom* kernel. I'm not sure really who'd want to do that ... perhaps for some type of embedded system? Anyway, if the docs haven't been updated, it needs to be known that you need more than 16MB RAM to run the FreeBSD installer for versions >= 5.3-RELEASE. For reference, see PR docs/77304. Kevin Kinsey * Looks like it has, see bmah's commit note ref: same PR... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 14:43:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DF816A4CE; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:43:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lynx.imedia.ru (lynx-comstar.imedia.ru [212.248.32.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888CC43D5A; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:42:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) Received: from badger.imedia.ru (root@local.badger [172.17.0.13]) j36EgiaH044180; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:42:44 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) Received: from badger.imedia.ru (eugene@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by badger.imedia.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j36Egitc069692; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:42:44 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by badger.imedia.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j36Eghoh069691; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:42:43 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) X-Authentication-Warning: badger.imedia.ru: eugene set sender to eugene@imedia.ru using -f From: Eugene Mitrofanov Organization: Independent Media To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:42:42 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504061842.43294.eugene@imedia.ru> cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: IBM eServer 346 ServeRaid is too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:43:00 -0000 Hi List I've got Subj and FreeBSD-5.4PRE on it. But RAID0 is too slow: root@beta:eugene# dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/tmp/1 bs=1m count=100 100+0 records in 100+0 records out 104857600 bytes transferred in 31.949508 secs (3281979 bytes/sec) Also what does the following mean? Interrupt storm detected on "irq16: bge0 bge1+"; throttling interrupt Kernel boot messages: Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #3: Wed Apr 6 17:46:08 MSD 2005 root@beta.cosmo.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BETA Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (3000.13-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf34 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbff real memory = 3221016576 (3071 MB) avail memory = 3153862656 (3007 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 6 ioapic2 irqs 48-71 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x588-0x58b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 pcib0: on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib1 pcib2: at device 4.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib2 pcib3: at device 0.0 on pci3 pci4: on pcib3 mpt0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem 0xcffe0000-0xcffeffff,0xcfff0000-0xcfffffff irq 28 at device 1.0 on pci4 pcib4: at device 0.2 on pci3 pci5: on pcib4 pcib5: at device 6.0 on pci0 pci6: on pcib5 bge0: mem 0xcdff0000-0xcdffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci6 miibus0: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:0d:60:9a:8d:08 pcib6: at device 7.0 on pci0 pci7: on pcib6 bge1: mem 0xcbff0000-0xcbffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci7 miibus1: on bge1 brgphy1: on miibus1 brgphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge1: Ethernet address: 00:0d:60:9a:8d:09 pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) uhci0: port 0x2200-0x221f irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0x2600-0x261f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xf0000000-0xf00003ff irq 23 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb0 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb1 usb2: EHCI version 1.0 usb2: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2: on ehci0 usb2: USB revision 2.0 uhub2: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: single transaction translator uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered pcib7: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib7 drm0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem 0xdfff0000-0xdfffffff,0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci1 info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.11.0 20020828 on minor 0 isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x480-0x48f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.2 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 ichsmb0: port 0x440-0x45f irq 17 at device 31.3 on pci0 smbus0: on ichsmb0 smb0: on smbus0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 atkbd: unable to set the command byte. kbd0 at atkbd0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A orm0: at iomem 0xcb000-0xcefff,0xc0000-0xcafff on isa0 pmtimer0 on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ipfw2 initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to accept, logging limited to 100 packets/entry by default acd0: DVDROM at ata0-master UDMA33 Waiting 8 seconds for SCSI devices to settle Interrupt storm detected on "irq16: bge0 bge1+"; throttling interrupt source ses0 at mpt0 bus 0 target 8 lun 0 ses0: Fixed Processor SCSI-2 device ses0: 3.300MB/s transfers ses0: SAF-TE Compliant Device pt0 at mpt0 bus 0 target 8 lun 0 pt0: Fixed Processor SCSI-2 device pt0: 3.300MB/s transfers da0 at mpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 34678MB (71020544 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4420C) SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a Best regards -- EMIT-RIPN, EVM7-RIPE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 14:55:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503D216A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:55:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu (hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu [132.183.156.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6ACA43D1F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:55:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remorse@partners.org) Received: from [132.183.156.105] (buxtehude.mgh.harvard.edu [132.183.156.105]) by hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j36EtHYW000628 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:55:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from remorse@partners.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: questions@freebsd.org From: Richard Morse Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:55:04 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: Owner permissions suddenly set to -x, possible compromise? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:55:05 -0000 Hi! I came in the morning and discovered that the file permissions on every cgi I have on my webserver had been set to u-x,go+x. This seems to have changed at about 4:30a this morning. I'm a bit worried by this, as I can't think of anything that would cause this, and there's nothing in any of the log files that would explain it. Has anyone run into this before? Can you direct me to a place I might find more information on it? A quick google search on "owner cannot exec" didn't turn up anything... Thanks, Ricky From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 14:59:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BCE16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:59:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C623143D2F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:59:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 18866 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2005 14:59:08 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 6 Apr 2005 14:59:08 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 73C462D; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:59:07 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: djkuzenko@indigomoon.ca, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <46dc360a050406071430fa3462@mail.gmail.com> <20050406142608.GA1246@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 06 Apr 2005 10:59:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050406142608.GA1246@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Message-ID: <44ekdovtms.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: docs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:59:09 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas writes: > On 2005-04-06 11:14, Don Kuzenko wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a number of machines running FreeBSD and I would like to create > > a local mirror of the documentation available on the FreeBSD website. > > My problem is that I currently have a dial up connection (rural living > > :-) > > > > Is there a simple way to obtain a tarball of a mirror of the docs so > > that I can access the docs via a browser on my machine. > > If you only need HTML docs, I can build you a snapshot with a couple of > formats, like FORMATS="html html-split", and upload it somewhere where > you can grab it at your leisure. > > If you prefer copying the files yourself, you can recursively retrieve a > copy of /pub/FreeBSD/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1 from one of the FTP mirrors. I think the "data" cvsup collection might serve the purpose nicely too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 15:06:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1A416A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:06:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp7.wanadoo.fr (smtp7.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3CD43D2D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:06:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0708.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F1D541C0009F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:06:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0708.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BFE631C0009B for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:06:05 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050406150605786.BFE631C0009B@mwinf0708.wanadoo.fr Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:06:05 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <919914389.20050406170605@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1112740114.3137.25.camel@red.nativenerds.com> References: <20050403094458.9267.qmail@web51107.mail.yahoo.com> <791630627.20050403134246@wanadoo.fr> <1112740114.3137.25.camel@red.nativenerds.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Hyperthreading not working on my 5.3 FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:06:07 -0000 Ed Stover writes: > don't you need apic as well ? > device apic # I/O APIC I didn't have to add it on my machine, so presumably it is there by default in the generic configuration. -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 15:08:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DBF16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:08:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B6543D39 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:08:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:9991 helo=mail.aseed.antenna.nl) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJC95-000NHT-Cl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:08:43 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by mail.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3CF15439A for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:09:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (f80052.upc-f.chello.nl [80.56.80.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C287558C843 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:08:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:08:42 +0200 From: "albi@scii.nl" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050406170842.5ad4f8f7.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <44ekdovtms.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <46dc360a050406071430fa3462@mail.gmail.com> <20050406142608.GA1246@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <44ekdovtms.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: docs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:08:44 -0000 On 06 Apr 2005 10:59:07 -0400 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas writes: > > > On 2005-04-06 11:14, Don Kuzenko wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have a number of machines running FreeBSD and I would like to > > > create a local mirror of the documentation available on the > > > FreeBSD website. My problem is that I currently have a dial up > > > connection (rural living :-) > > > > > > Is there a simple way to obtain a tarball of a mirror of the docs > > > so that I can access the docs via a browser on my machine. > > > > If you only need HTML docs, I can build you a snapshot with a couple > > of formats, like FORMATS="html html-split", and upload it somewhere > > where you can grab it at your leisure. > > > > If you prefer copying the files yourself, you can recursively > > retrieve a copy of /pub/FreeBSD/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1 from one of the > > FTP mirrors. > > I think the "data" cvsup collection might serve the purpose nicely > too. if the modem is a 2400bps then it might also be good to look at /usr/share/doc, as e.g. the handbook is there ;-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 15:09:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8993E16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:09:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.notarius.org (smtp.notarius.org [207.253.43.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C205443D2F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:09:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.robillard@notarius.com) Received: from paris.notarius.lan ([172.25.1.48]) by smtp.notarius.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:09:51 -0400 Received: from paris.notarius.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by paris.notarius.lan (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j36FAnIM053001 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:10:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from drobilla@paris.notarius.lan) Received: (from drobilla@localhost) by paris.notarius.lan (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j36FAi0b053000 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:10:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from drobilla) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:10:44 -0400 From: David Robillard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050406151044.GA52965@paris.notarius.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2005 15:09:51.0024 (UTC) FILETIME=[AE29F300:01C53ABA] Subject: Donating to FreeBSD. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:09:52 -0000 Hello everyone, We would like to donate to the FreeBSD project. Unfortunateley, the FreeBSD Foundation website is actually down with no link to the appropriate contact information. Can anybody point me in the right direction as on how to proceed besides waiting for the site to come back online? And for those of you who donated to the FreeBSD project. May I ask how much did you decided to give? I'm just looking for ball park figures, just for curiosity's sake. Many thanks, David -- David Robillard UNIX systems administrator david.robillard@notarius.com Notarius (TSIN) Inc. 465, rue St-Jean, suite 200 Montreal, Quebec, H2Y 2R6 Tel. : +1 514 966 0122 Fax. : +1 514 281 1226 http://www.notarius.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 15:15:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8E216A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:15:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A669043D3F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:15:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rpratt1950@earthlink.net) Received: from [65.41.159.229] (helo=kt.weeble.com) by smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DJCFz-0004yV-S4; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:15:52 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=test1; d=earthlink.net; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=WYP5GLnwSB1WT9x5tax0eJ60s1uNEyE7rV1LmgUc+WIZ3NF7JKpsVMXaMzibpBPB; Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:15:50 -0400 From: Randy Pratt To: Jonathan Arnold Message-Id: <20050406111550.25396502.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: References: <42528039.1010708@tiscali.co.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 96132b9c1759af1df21c5f5255d6c174239a348a220c2609659e5ad965f6d1cb19d8b528cd9dcead3ca473d225a0f487350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 65.41.159.229 cc: bertybadboy cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: .iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:15:53 -0000 On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:23:03 -0400 Jonathan Arnold wrote: > bertybadboy wrote: > > Which .iso files do i download and burn onto a cd? > > I was all set with a big explanation of what the ISOs were, and > to complain that there wasn't a nice, easy to find, concise > description in the handbook, when I actually looked for it and > found it with no problem. > > The place to start, of course, when installing FreeBSD is Chapter > Two in the handbook, entitled, appropriately enough, "Installing > FreeBSD": > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install.html > > As part of section 2.2, "Pre-installation Tasks", there is section > 2.2.6 "Obtain the FreeBSD Installation Files". And it points you to > section 2.13 "Preparing Your Own Installation Media": > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-diff-media.html > > And that has an excellent and concise description of the ISO files. > > The gist of that is you should download the -miniinst version (not > the -mini version as described in the handbook) if you have a fast > internet connection and want to install the packages online, or > the -disc1 version if you want to have a CD with it prepackage. The > biggest advantage to using the miniinst version is that you are > sure to get the latest version of the package, while the -disc1 > version is what was available when the ISO was created. The original poster didn't say which version he wanted to install but I would presume its something very recent. I think that information is good for anything prior to 5.4 but it seems to be changing somewhat starting with the 5.4-RC1. From the announcement ( http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050405144935.GA54439 ): "The layout of the installation CDs is slightly different than previous releases. The disc1 image should be used to start the install. It contains a "live filesystem" and the set of packages that normally get installed as part of a minimal install (perl, the baseline Xorg windowing system, and on i386 the base Linux emulation package). The disc2 image contains a larger variety of packages (kde3, gnome2, etc) that can be installed while doing the initial installation of the machine, but if you just want to do a minimal install disc1 should be all you need." I gather that the miniinst.iso won't be available as a separate iso since its essentially now -disc1. I like the idea of a base install and live filesystem on the same disc. However, it appears that someone wanting to do a fresh install with KDE/Gnome/etc will now need to download both -disc1 and -disc2. Its more to download but the selection of packages on the CDs is probably larger. If I am misreading the announcement I'm sure someone will correct me. Hope this helps more than confuses! Randy -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 15:18:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE81316A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:18:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34F343D48 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:18:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:9992 helo=mail.aseed.antenna.nl) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJCI4-000D7s-LB; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:18:00 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by mail.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF15015439A; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:19:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (f80052.upc-f.chello.nl [80.56.80.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DB758C827; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:18:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:17:59 +0200 From: "albi@scii.nl" To: Richard Morse Message-Id: <20050406171759.04987532.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Owner permissions suddenly set to -x, possible compromise? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:18:02 -0000 On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:55:04 -0400 Richard Morse wrote: > Hi! I came in the morning and discovered that the file permissions on > every cgi I have on my webserver had been set to u-x,go+x. This > seems > to have changed at about 4:30a this morning. I'm a bit worried by > this, as I can't think of anything that would cause this, and there's > nothing in any of the log files that would explain it. 4:30a sounds like a cronjob might have done this, but it does not ring a bell > Has anyone run into this before? Can you direct me to a place I might > find more information on it? A quick google search on "owner cannot > exec" didn't turn up anything... i suggest (since you're worried) you do some reading about security in general for FreeBSD, e.g. starting here : http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security.html personally i would : - take the machine down - compare md5sums with a freshly installed machine - do some more "forensic research" with things like sleuthkit - for the future use a tripwire-style program like yafic (from ports) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 15:23:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3D416A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:23:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from jbhosting.de (mail.jbhosting.de [80.190.201.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150A143D1D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:23:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonas@schiebtsich.net) Received: (qmail 68625 invoked by uid 545); 6 Apr 2005 15:23:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.77?) (jonsonn@jbhosting.de@213.155.74.126) by mx010.jbhosting.de with (RC4-MD5 encrypted) SMTP; 6 Apr 2005 15:23:30 -0000 From: jonas Organization: schiebtsich.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:23:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504061723.20099.jonas@schiebtsich.net> Subject: strange kern.ngroups problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:23:35 -0000 Hi questions list, I have a set of users in a NIS/YP database who may login on multiple machines. Now for some reason, on one of those machines (5.3-RELEASE-p6), any user who belongs to more groups than 4 on the NIS/YP server cannot login any more. If I'm using su as root to become this user I get: su: setusercontext: Invalid argument This is only the case on this one 5.3-R-p6 machine. All machines have kern.ngroups set to 16. While I'm certain I have not changed a lot from the default install, is there any place other than the kern.ngroups sysctl variable that I may have changed by accident to decrease the max groups per user? I could also provide output from truss down to: setgroups(0x11,0xbfbfe660) ERR#22 'Invalid argument' Thanks, -- br. j. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 15:27:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2236616A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:27:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Gina.esfm.ipn.mx (esfm.ipn.mx [148.204.102.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5BF43D49 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:27:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from Gina.esfm.ipn.mx (localhost.esfm.ipn.mx [127.0.0.1]) by Gina.esfm.ipn.mx (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j36FQF92018282; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:26:15 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from localhost (mrspock@localhost)j36FQEAU018279; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:26:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) X-Authentication-Warning: Gina.esfm.ipn.mx: mrspock owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:26:14 -0500 (CDT) From: Eduardo Viruena Silva To: =?iso-8859-1?B?Qmr2cm4gS/ZuaWc=?= In-Reply-To: <20050405172621.7155D12B015@eurystheus.local> Message-ID: <20050406102407.O16224@Gina.esfm.ipn.mx> References: <20050405172621.7155D12B015@eurystheus.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: shell question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:27:58 -0000 On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Bj=F6rn K=F6nig wrote: > mrspock at esfm dot ipn dot mx wrote: > > > I need to concatenate the standard output and then > standard > > error output in a file, but I need to convert the standard > > > output into PostScript before the concatenation. > > > > program stdout 2> stderr > > cat stdout > out > > a2ps stderr >> out > > > > a2ps is in the ports and it converts plain text into > PostScript. > > > > The problem is that I don't want to use the temporary file > > > that I used above (stdout, stderr, out), I just want a > "filter" > > program < stdin 3>&1 1>&2 2>&3 | a2ps > > Regards Bj=F6rn > Thanks for your help, Bj=F6rn. I think I'd better study a little more this redirection operators. Thanks again. =09Eduardo. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 15:36:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87ADF16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:36:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A946743D45 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:36:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j36FZLoZ019676; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:35:21 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j36FaBRK030464; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:36:11 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j36FaBiG030463; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:36:11 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:36:11 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: David Robillard Message-ID: <20050406153611.GA30405@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <20050406151044.GA52965@paris.notarius.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050406151044.GA52965@paris.notarius.lan> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Donating to FreeBSD. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:36:15 -0000 On 2005-04-06 11:10, David Robillard wrote: > Hello everyone, > > We would like to donate to the FreeBSD project. > > Unfortunateley, the FreeBSD Foundation website is actually down > with no link to the appropriate contact information. You can always contact donations@freebsd.org or browse the donations web site, looking for things that are currently needed by some of the contributors. http://www.freebsd.org/donations/ > Can anybody point me in the right direction as on how to > proceed besides waiting for the site to come back online? > > And for those of you who donated to the FreeBSD project. > May I ask how much did you decided to give? > I'm just looking for ball park figures, just for curiosity's sake. Providing some of the things listed in the "want list" of the donations pages is a great idea :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 15:53:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF8016A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:53:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51107.mail.yahoo.com (web51107.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9018043D4C for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:53:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fasi_74@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 73175 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Apr 2005 15:53:30 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=0vYNRCTvLqIZpgXCwew4uabJI+4u/MI47oXjX78aOdOk8pImlnJwwMvYHSqx7LyDgXhs3dHqD44Mh5eUeX1AER9C0aGo1QgUgEzLIrkmPwtvEVqxhAy0U8iHsF4pIbJuEKf+1Mc1OiyF5I6pOsPA/mwu+mpcqT03LWAAjsIZ49A= ; Message-ID: <20050406155330.73173.qmail@web51107.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.38.57.98] by web51107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:53:30 PDT Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:53:30 -0700 (PDT) From: faisal gillani To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: ipfw firewall mailing list ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:53:32 -0000 can u guys tell me , is there any ipfw firewall i can subscribe to to learn it or ask daily usage questions to ? thanks *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ Allah-hu-Akber*º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ God is the Greatest __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 15:54:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789FF16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:54:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202EE43D45 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:54:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j36Fs25M013922; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:54:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:54:02 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: jonas Message-ID: <20050406155401.GJ64927@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200504061723.20099.jonas@schiebtsich.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504061723.20099.jonas@schiebtsich.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange kern.ngroups problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:54:03 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 06), jonas said: > I have a set of users in a NIS/YP database who may login on multiple > machines. > > Now for some reason, on one of those machines (5.3-RELEASE-p6), any > user who belongs to more groups than 4 on the NIS/YP server cannot > login any more. If I'm using su as root to become this user I get: > su: setusercontext: Invalid argument > > This is only the case on this one 5.3-R-p6 machine. All machines have > kern.ngroups set to 16. > > While I'm certain I have not changed a lot from the default install, > is there any place other than the kern.ngroups sysctl variable that I > may have changed by accident to decrease the max groups per user? > > I could also provide output from truss down to: > setgroups(0x11,0xbfbfe660) ERR#22 'Invalid argument' 0x11 = 17, which is a whole lot more than 4. Is the user a member of any local groups (see /etc/group)? What does "id nisuser" print? -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 16:03:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D15116A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:03:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8971343D58 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:03:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j36G2due031628; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:02:39 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j36G3U1i063458; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:03:30 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j36G3UZT063456; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:03:30 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:03:29 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: djkuzenko@indigomoon.ca Message-ID: <20050406160329.GA54291@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <46dc360a050406071430fa3462@mail.gmail.com> <20050406142608.GA1246@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050406142608.GA1246@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:03:35 -0000 On 2005-04-06 17:26, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On 2005-04-06 11:14, Don Kuzenko wrote: >> Is there a simple way to obtain a tarball of a mirror of the docs so >> that I can access the docs via a browser on my machine. > > If you only need HTML docs, I can build you a snapshot with a couple of > formats, like FORMATS="html html-split", and upload it somewhere where > you can grab it at your leisure. Ok, I just uploaded a snapshot build from today's doc/ tree at: http://keramida.serverhive.com/freebsd/doc/snapshots/current/en/ The compressed tarballs of html-split and html output formats are relatively small (about 2.7 MB each), and they have been built with URL_RELPREFIX=yes to make local browsing easier. I have been planning to install a local tinderbox for the doc/ tree for a while now, so this may be a good chance to do it and add the necessary smarts for automatic uploading of successful builds ;-) - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 16:06:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA34B16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:06:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72A443D31 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:06:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j36G5Xa5006946; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:05:33 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j36G6Pjl064834; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:06:25 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j36G6PIc064833; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:06:25 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:06:25 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: faisal gillani Message-ID: <20050406160625.GA63744@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <20050406155330.73173.qmail@web51107.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050406155330.73173.qmail@web51107.mail.yahoo.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw firewall mailing list ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:06:29 -0000 On 2005-04-06 08:53, faisal gillani wrote: > can u guys tell me , is there any ipfw firewall i can subscribe to to > learn it or ask daily usage questions to ? The freebsd-questions list is the best place to ask about configuration details of ipfw. There is a freebsd-ipfw mailing list, but that's aimed towards more technical, in-depth discussions about the internals of ipfw & dummynet; so, it's probably not a good idea to post usage questions to that list. Post them here... Since a lot of people have already asked a thousand and one things about ipfw, you may also search the mailing list archives and see if any questions you have have already been answered: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 16:11:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BCE16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:11:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from jbhosting.de (mail.jbhosting.de [80.190.201.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF57A43D46 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:11:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonas@schiebtsich.net) Received: (qmail 74504 invoked by uid 545); 6 Apr 2005 16:11:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.77?) (jonsonn@jbhosting.de@213.155.74.126) by mx010.jbhosting.de with (RC4-MD5 encrypted) SMTP; 6 Apr 2005 16:11:26 -0000 From: jonas Organization: schiebtsich.net To: Dan Nelson Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:11:16 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200504061723.20099.jonas@schiebtsich.net> <20050406155401.GJ64927@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20050406155401.GJ64927@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504061811.16755.jonas@schiebtsich.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange kern.ngroups problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:11:29 -0000 Hi Dan, On Wednesday 06 April 2005 17:54, Dan Nelson wrote: > Is the user a member of any local groups (see /etc/group)? no, /etc/group is untouched since install. > What does "id nisuser" print? A whole lot more. Groups coming through winbind.... 17 total... Of course this is the only machine running winbind. Thanks! -- br. j. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 16:15:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0A116A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:15:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8AD43D2F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:15:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.234] (c-24-8-184-241.hsd1.co.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j36GF5xP029127; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:15:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <42540B09.2000801@vilot.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:15:05 -0600 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050330) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Vilot References: <20050322162216.GA1354@vilot.com> <1111509994.751.306.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <20050322170234.GA1576@vilot.com> <1111513253.751.314.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <4240D4EE.60004@vilot.com> <1111561796.751.348.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <20050323164316.GB1383@vilot.com> In-Reply-To: <20050323164316.GB1383@vilot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Peter Risdon cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: PHP / Apache bus error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:15:23 -0000 >Peter Risdon helpful contributes: > > > >>You don't _have_ to boot into single user mode. See below. >> >> > >Okay, cool. > I did it. Upgraded to 4.11 without any problems. However ... I still have the following problems: 1. child pid 28305 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) messages (lots of 'em) in httpd error logs. 2. Gallery doesn't work. Returns an empty page, and I get a Signal 10 in the error log. 3. Drupal doesn't work. Blank php page is returned. I'm fairly confident this is php / mysql / httpd related. So, for your reference, I have: apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22 php4-4.3.10_2 php4-gettext-4.3.10_2 php4-mysql-4.3.10_2 php4-pcre-4.3.10_2 php4-pear-4.3.10_2 php4-pgsql-4.3.10_2 php4-session-4.3.10_2 php4-xml-4.3.10_2 mysql-client-3.23.58 mysql-client-4.0.15 mysql-server-3.23.58 php4-mysql-4.3.10_2 zope-zmysqlda-2.0.8_1 I do not know HOW I ended up with two installs of mysql client .. but there ya go. So if anyone sees anything obvious in those versions ... I would love to hear about it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 16:30:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F2316A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:30:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com (wolf.pjkh.com [66.228.196.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A4543D1D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:30:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DA0552B for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wolf.pjkh.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44859-07 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D18745529; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F2C54C0 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:30:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Philip Hallstrom To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200504060729.42571.krinklyfig@spymac.com> Message-ID: <20050406092757.V44943@wolf.pjkh.com> References: <36f5bbba050406001514562df7@mail.gmail.com> <4253B4CE.6070504@locolomo.org> <200504060729.42571.krinklyfig@spymac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pjkh.com Subject: Re: too many illegal connection attempts through ssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:30:53 -0000 >>>> shown below is snapshot of too many illegal attempts to login to >>>> my server from a suspicious hacker. this is taken from the >>>> "/var/log/auth.log". my question is, how do i automatically block >>>> an IP address if it is attempting to guess my login usernames? >>>> can i configure the firewall to check the instances a certain IP >>>> has attempted to access/ssh the sevrer, and if it has failed to >>>> login for about "x" number of attempts, it will be blocked >>>> automatically? >>> >>> This question is asked on the list ever so often - see the archives >>> for suggestions. These are automated attacks, they come regularly >>> as crackers, black hats or script kidies scan across the net. >> >> Does anybody know what robots beeing used? And on what systems? All >> you mention later in your posting is true of course and I needn't >> care about these logs, but it's like like somebody unknown puts 10 >> flyers in your letterbox every night. I'm sure, one night you'll hide >> and build a trap for that person. I'm too lazy to enter those >> net-circles for finding these robots, but maybe some other has >> already done that? I haven't done that, but if you don't like them you can block them fairly easily... I wrote a little script in PHP (not that it would be hard to re-write in perl or whatever) that watches /var/log/auth.log and if it sees an invalid login, it adds a firewall rule to block that IP. Then I've got a separate cronjob that removes those firewall rules a couple minutes later. Yes, I have locked myself out of my own server when I mistype my password, but I just wait a minute and it lets me back in. I thought about modifying it so instead of outright blocking it, it put it into a pipe that limited it's bandwidth to almost nil just to hold the thing up a bit, but this works for me.. http://www.pjkh.com/sshmonitor/ -philip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 16:40:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6613516A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:40:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com (wolf.pjkh.com [66.228.196.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2424143D39 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:40:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392D7553F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wolf.pjkh.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45137-04 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 049965529; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:40:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18BF54C9 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:40:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:40:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Philip Hallstrom To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050406093528.I44943@wolf.pjkh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pjkh.com Subject: Recommended search engine for web pages and maybe email? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:40:27 -0000 Hi all - Recently I've found myself searching the freebsd ports web site quite frequently as well as some other online documentation (php, mysql, postgresql, freebsd faq/handbook) and it always bothers me because I know I can mirror that stuff and search it locally and in general cut down on their load. It's been a long time since I've setup any search engines/spiders to do this sort of thing. In the past I've used htdig and mnogosearch. I was hoping someone out there could tell me which one of those (or a third such as openfts?) I should install and get going to save me some time trying them all out. I think the only feature I really care about is being able to limit the search to a particular collection (freebsd ports, php manual, etc.) As an aside, I've got about 60mb (~ 5,000 messages) stored in pine's mbox format that I occasionally grep through, but would be nice if it was little more advanced... I've also thought maybe I should just host it on an external server, and only allow my hosts and google's indexer to crawl it and just rely on google. Suggestions? recommendations? Thanks! -philip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 17:53:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DA416A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:53:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D61443D1F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:53:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D835D08; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:53:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46350-01; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:53:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-53-96.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.53.96]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C4C5CE7; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:53:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <425421D0.8010607@mac.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:52:16 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Petraschek References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Viewing DNS cache entries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 17:53:44 -0000 Martin Petraschek wrote: [ ... ] > Thank you, Dan. I was not aware of the fact that FreeBSD does not cache > DNS entries unless you are running a name server. At least some versions of the standard C library will cache the last DNS looked up, and reuse that value if the process asks about the same host again. That turns out to be almost free to do, and is still reasonably helpful for many cases. However, FreeBSD does not have a global cache the way Windows does, or things like nscd (Solaris) or lookupd (MacOS X)... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 18:31:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0896116A4CE; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:31:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prosporo.hedron.org (hedron.org [66.11.182.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA0643D48; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:31:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ean@hedron.org) Received: from www.hedron.org (localhost.hedron.org [127.0.0.1]) by prosporo.hedron.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72714C12C; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:32:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 216.220.59.169 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ean); by www.hedron.org with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:32:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1318.216.220.59.169.1112812328.squirrel@216.220.59.169> In-Reply-To: <1112789082.28348.5.camel@mis3c.rtl.lan> References: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> <200504051850.33281.ean@hedron.org> <1112789082.28348.5.camel@mis3c.rtl.lan> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:32:08 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ean Kingston" To: "Jason Stewart" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Ean Kingston Subject: Re: suspending login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 18:31:15 -0000 > On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 18:50 -0400, Ean Kingston wrote: >> On April 5, 2005 06:42 pm, Bob Ababurko wrote: >> > Hello all- >> > >> > I am trying to figure out how to suspend a login for a user. Do I >> have >> > to do this with password aging or is there an easier(read brute force) >> > way to disallow a user from logging in? >> >> the safest way is to set the shell to /sbin/nologin and the home >> directory >> to /nonexistant in your auth system. The latter is especially needed if >> you >> allow ssh for remote login since the public-key authentication >> mechanisms >> sometimes bypass the normal login restrictions. >> > > Am I mistaken here, or will doing that only deny the user a shell and > home directory? The user will still be able to authenticate against the > password database right? > > To the best of my knowledge the "correct" way of doing this is either > the asterisk method in the password field using vipw or the more user > friendly way of using pw(8) with the lock command. Yes, that will allow the user to authenticate against the password database but the user has no home directory and a shell that kicks the user out right away. If you change the password entry then, when you want to enable the user again, the user has to enter a new password. This way, the user keeps his/her old password. Note, the question asked for suspend, not remove. I read suspend as implying that the account may be used again. If what is wanted is a permanent removal of the user then the entire home-directory and it's contents should be removed as well. Also, a search for all files owned by that user needs to be done and those files need to be cleaned up. -- Ean Kingston E-Mail: ean_AT_hedron_DOT_org PGP KeyID: 1024D/CBC5D6BB URL: http://www.hedron.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 18:31:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0896116A4CE; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:31:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prosporo.hedron.org (hedron.org [66.11.182.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA0643D48; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:31:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ean@hedron.org) Received: from www.hedron.org (localhost.hedron.org [127.0.0.1]) by prosporo.hedron.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72714C12C; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:32:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 216.220.59.169 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ean); by www.hedron.org with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:32:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1318.216.220.59.169.1112812328.squirrel@216.220.59.169> In-Reply-To: <1112789082.28348.5.camel@mis3c.rtl.lan> References: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> <200504051850.33281.ean@hedron.org> <1112789082.28348.5.camel@mis3c.rtl.lan> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:32:08 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ean Kingston" To: "Jason Stewart" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Ean Kingston Subject: Re: suspending login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 18:31:15 -0000 > On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 18:50 -0400, Ean Kingston wrote: >> On April 5, 2005 06:42 pm, Bob Ababurko wrote: >> > Hello all- >> > >> > I am trying to figure out how to suspend a login for a user. Do I >> have >> > to do this with password aging or is there an easier(read brute force) >> > way to disallow a user from logging in? >> >> the safest way is to set the shell to /sbin/nologin and the home >> directory >> to /nonexistant in your auth system. The latter is especially needed if >> you >> allow ssh for remote login since the public-key authentication >> mechanisms >> sometimes bypass the normal login restrictions. >> > > Am I mistaken here, or will doing that only deny the user a shell and > home directory? The user will still be able to authenticate against the > password database right? > > To the best of my knowledge the "correct" way of doing this is either > the asterisk method in the password field using vipw or the more user > friendly way of using pw(8) with the lock command. Yes, that will allow the user to authenticate against the password database but the user has no home directory and a shell that kicks the user out right away. If you change the password entry then, when you want to enable the user again, the user has to enter a new password. This way, the user keeps his/her old password. Note, the question asked for suspend, not remove. I read suspend as implying that the account may be used again. If what is wanted is a permanent removal of the user then the entire home-directory and it's contents should be removed as well. Also, a search for all files owned by that user needs to be done and those files need to be cleaned up. -- Ean Kingston E-Mail: ean_AT_hedron_DOT_org PGP KeyID: 1024D/CBC5D6BB URL: http://www.hedron.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 18:40:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FF716A515 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:40:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Gina.esfm.ipn.mx (esfm.ipn.mx [148.204.102.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB3743D53 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:40:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from Gina.esfm.ipn.mx (localhost.esfm.ipn.mx [127.0.0.1]) by Gina.esfm.ipn.mx (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j36IcVGD035192; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:38:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from localhost (mrspock@localhost)j36IcVbr035189; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:38:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) X-Authentication-Warning: Gina.esfm.ipn.mx: mrspock owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:38:31 -0500 (CDT) From: Eduardo Viruena Silva To: Richard Caley In-Reply-To: <87ekdo2vnc.fsf@pele.r.caley.org.uk> Message-ID: <20050406100221.M16224@Gina.esfm.ipn.mx> References: <63501.201.135.130.41.1112718721.squirrel@201.135.130.41> <87ekdo2vnc.fsf@pele.r.caley.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: shell question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 18:40:19 -0000 On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Richard Caley wrote: > In article <63501.201.135.130.41.1112718721.squirrel@201.135.130.41>, mrspock (m) writes: > > m> The problem is that I don't want to use the temporary > m> file that I used above (stdout, stderr, out), I just > m> want a "filter" > > If you want to rearange the output so that all the errors are after > all the non errors, then you are going to need storage of some sort. I > think that is logically unavoidable. > > There may be some kind of shuffle you can do with named pipes or > something, but those kind of things have limited storage. Any time > your command produces more error output than that space can hold, it > will be stopped. Since you are not reading that stream until the main > output is finished you'd then have a deadlock. > > -- > Mail me as MYFIRSTNAME@MYLASTNAME.org.uk _O_ > |< Thank you, Richard. Efectively, I found that is easier to create a temporary file with one of the output files, in this case "stderr". Stderr is used, in this case to create a listing of the data that the program is using and, occasionally, it issues an error message, in this case the program stops. I finally programmed this process in this way: program 2> tempfile | (cat && a2sp tempfile) | ps2pdf As I already stated, my program is creating a PostScript output in its stdout and a "listing" in the stderr file. a2ps is converting this listing to PostScript and both of them, finally, are converted to a PDF document with GhostScripts [in the ports]. Finally, the name "pipes" is very precise to describe what is happening with the "streams"; obviously, if I want to process one of the streams after the other one, I need to contain the "water" of the second temporally. Thanks for your time and your help. Eduardo. PS. Perhaps you are interested in visiting my page: http://michelle.esfm.ipn.mx/~mrspock/superspiro Cut & Paste one of the examples and execute the program at the end of the page. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 19:16:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F1216A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:16:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD8143D4C for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:16:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from justarock@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 37so324443wra for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:16:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=D7BkPiXxwDaJ3ngrWcrXb4s5yW1uxJg3zzQdqa/85tZ8oZXtahP5pxwEbJQniS7vRRtYAxtiQqVJEZlcv4RLoU/dWZFN6a0sPR948qSkYHt2Vl7MV+IXKmC9D53v/8RHO2D3XiWnE4Kwav3VeCLgli3/f2qNvlmykB064HCQ30Y= Received: by 10.54.29.66 with SMTP id c66mr296087wrc; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.3.50 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:16:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6bd74b4b05040612163e0dcc88@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:16:38 -0600 From: Shea Frederick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: unable to mount secondary hard disks now X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Shea Frederick List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 19:16:41 -0000 Im running FreeBSD 5.3, its an almost fresh install. Its been running for about 7 days now. I have an internal IDE drive that the OS runs from, then I have two external firewire drives (da0, da1) that are only used as Samba shares. This morning i found that one of the firewire drives are no longer mounted (da1), this might have happened when I uninstalled Samba 2.x and installed 3.x yesterday, then rebooted. but im not sure, because i didnt check to see if the drive was still mounted after the reboot. So i figured i would just mount it again (even though da1 in the fstab).... FileServer# mount /dev/da1s1c /mnt/jabba mount: /dev/da1s1c on /mnt/jabba: incorrect super block So now im not realy sure what to do, this drive was working perfectly before the reboot. someone told me to run fsck on the drive, but that gives me the following error. FileServer# fsck /dev/da1s1c ** /dev/da1s1c Cannot find file system superblock /dev/da1s1c: NOT LABELED AS A BSD FILE SYSTEM (unused) here is what fdisk returns... FileServer# fdisk /dev/da1s1c ******* Working on device /dev/da1s1c ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=9728 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=9728 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: The data for partition 2 is: The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 0, size 50000 (24 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 0/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 Here are the relevant lines from my fstab... /dev/da0c /mnt/yoda ufs rw 2 2 /dev/da1s1c /mnt/jabba ufs rw 2 2 Thanks in advance -Shea From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 19:17:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0E316A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:17:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay11-f30.bay11.hotmail.com [64.4.39.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0AD43D2D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:17:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ing_social_@msn.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:17:22 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 69.118.87.9 by by11fd.bay11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 19:17:21 GMT X-Originating-IP: [69.118.87.9] X-Originating-Email: [ing_social_@msn.com] X-Sender: ing_social_@msn.com From: "gfdggdfg fdgdret" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 19:17:21 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2005 19:17:22.0397 (UTC) FILETIME=[4245A0D0:01C53ADD] Subject: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 19:17:22 -0000 hello!! how do you feel? I'm rookie to use freebsd. I have a question. How I can change my resolution of my consola. I use freebsd 5.3 on laptop, just I want to know how I can change that resolution 640x400 "something like that" to a 1024x768. how I change. thks I wish you can help me to do it _________________________________________________________________ Want to meet David Beckham? http://www.msn.co.in/gillette/ Fly to Madrid with Gillette! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 19:32:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6947616A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:32:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0FF43D1F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:32:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ts4short@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so258919rng for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:32:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nv3JuVvZgNvQ8jHtn5+gW7cv+YTHCUtiEIRjO8nhwL1ePmPJwyQjpP/iWpaqAyCqjI4ac6CMHnGrlmspECHLmN+fv/+bY4S1wmBl61U878HHy6uIUVKfr8nJULDIt9YuI63Npnabj2YrAt/Dsu8EAIaiY1qJ4vw/iKdFtYjC748= Received: by 10.38.218.39 with SMTP id q39mr1112509rng; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.12.54 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4878093805040612323d984eb0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:32:14 -0400 From: Todd Shirk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: automount usb flash drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Todd Shirk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 19:32:15 -0000 I was trying to figure out how to have a usb flash drive automount when I plug it in. I currently have the following line in /etc/fstab /dev/da0s1 /mnt/usbkey msdos rw,-m700,noauto 0 0 and the following in /etc/devfs.conf perm da0s1 0666 when I do the following command line command the usb flash drive mount fine # mount /mnt/usbkey But, when I'm in KDE viewing media:/ Removable Device (da0s1) is shown is unmounted. At the user level command line and in KDE, I receive /dev/da0s1: Operation not permitted. I'm not sure if part of the issue is permissions or if I'm missing a piece for the auto-mounting to happen. Any thoughts? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 19:42:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606BE16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:42:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from iaces.com (horton.iaces.com [204.147.87.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3E543D1F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:42:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptroot@iaces.com) Received: from [204.147.87.125] (borg.iaces.com [204.147.87.125]) by iaces.com (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j36JgAfP026371; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:42:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ptroot@iaces.com) Message-ID: <42543BB3.1000202@iaces.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:42:43 -0500 From: "Paul T. Root" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shea Frederick References: <6bd74b4b05040612163e0dcc88@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6bd74b4b05040612163e0dcc88@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unable to mount secondary hard disks now X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 19:42:12 -0000 I'm not entirely sure, but it sure looks like da1s4c to me. Why is one drive da0c and the other da1s1c? How did you set them up? Shea Frederick wrote: > Im running FreeBSD 5.3, its an almost fresh install. Its been running > for about 7 days now. I have an internal IDE drive that the OS runs > from, then I have two external firewire drives (da0, da1) that are > only used as Samba shares. > > This morning i found that one of the firewire drives are no longer > mounted (da1), this might have happened when I uninstalled Samba 2.x > and installed 3.x yesterday, then rebooted. but im not sure, because i > didnt check to see if the drive was still mounted after the reboot. > > So i figured i would just mount it again (even though da1 in the fstab).... > > FileServer# mount /dev/da1s1c /mnt/jabba > mount: /dev/da1s1c on /mnt/jabba: incorrect super block > > So now im not realy sure what to do, this drive was working perfectly > before the reboot. > > someone told me to run fsck on the drive, but that gives me the following error. > > FileServer# fsck /dev/da1s1c > ** /dev/da1s1c > Cannot find file system superblock > /dev/da1s1c: NOT LABELED AS A BSD FILE SYSTEM (unused) > > here is what fdisk returns... > > FileServer# fdisk /dev/da1s1c > ******* Working on device /dev/da1s1c ******* > parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: > cylinders=9728 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) > > Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 > parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: > cylinders=9728 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) > > Media sector size is 512 > Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 > Information from DOS bootblock is: > The data for partition 1 is: > > The data for partition 2 is: > > The data for partition 3 is: > > The data for partition 4 is: > sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) > start 0, size 50000 (24 Meg), flag 80 (active) > beg: cyl 0/ head 0/ sector 1; > end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 > > Here are the relevant lines from my fstab... > /dev/da0c /mnt/yoda ufs rw 2 2 > /dev/da1s1c /mnt/jabba ufs rw 2 2 > > Thanks in advance > -Shea -- ______ Paul T. Root / _ \ 1977 MGB / /|| \\ ||\/ || _ | || || || \ ||__// \______/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 19:56:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A177C16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:56:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.UU.SE [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8378043D45 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:56:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 40D94484E; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:56:57 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s196618; Wed, 6 Apr 05 21:56:45 +0200 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDAA484E for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:56:45 +0200 (MSZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id BF7F738013; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:56:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FAF5C002 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:56:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:56:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Davour To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Domainname X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 19:56:59 -0000 I didn't think when I was doing my last install, and now my system has a domainname it shouldn't have. Too many different operating systems compete for space in my brain and I can't seem to find any information about "fully qualified domainname" in the fine manual, since all it talks about is NIS/YP, which isn't my problem. Any hints? /andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 20:01:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3478316A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:01:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C1843D2F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:01:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) j36K1EpB046025; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:01:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9651563AE; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:01:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:01:14 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050406200114.GA64643@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Todd Shirk References: <4878093805040612323d984eb0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4878093805040612323d984eb0@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! Organization: Me, organized? X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner cc: Todd Shirk Subject: Re: automount usb flash drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:01:17 -0000 --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:32:14PM -0400, Todd Shirk wrote: > I was trying to figure out how to have a usb flash drive automount > when I plug it in. I currently have the following line in /etc/fstab >=20 > /dev/da0s1 /mnt/usbkey msdos rw,-m700,noauto 0 0 >=20 > and the following in /etc/devfs.conf >=20 > perm da0s1 0666 devfs.conf only works for devices available at boot time. For devices you can plug in at runtime you should use /etc/devfs.rules: [foobar=3D10] add path 'da*s*' mode 0666 And you should have the following in /etc/rc.conf: devfs_system_ruleset=3D"foobar" The contents of devfs.rules are fed to devfs(8), so see it's manual page. > when I do the following command line command the usb flash drive mount fi= ne >=20 > # mount /mnt/usbkey >=20 > But, when I'm in KDE viewing media:/ Removable Device (da0s1) is > shown is unmounted. >=20 > At the user level command line and in KDE, I receive /dev/da0s1: > Operation not permitted. For a user to be able to use a filesystem, there are a couple of things that need to be done: - The sysctl variable vfs.usermount must be set to 1 (in /etc/sysctl.conf). - The user in question must own the mount point. > I'm not sure if part of the issue is permissions or if I'm missing a > piece for the auto-mounting to happen. I think the latter. Normally usbd(8) is notified of USB events, but in this case it seems to get events for the umass* device, not the da*s* device that you'll want to use. There have been people who've used a shell-script called by usbd to figure out the connection between umass<->da from dmesg output and then mount the filesystem, but that doesn't do umounts. It's also complicated if you want it to work for multiple users, unless you give it 777 permissions. You could also give amd(8) a try. I found that making a one-line shell script to do the mounting is much less hassle. Roland --=20 R.F. Smith /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign r s m i t h @ x s 4 a l l . n l \ / No HTML/RTF in e-mail http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ X No Word docs in e-mail public key: http://www.keyserver.net / \ Respect for open standards --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCVEAKEnfvsMMhpyURAry9AJ9k65BXKTHKDJQmUKmY1Jw/ETOLoACgsR9R fvr183T7neNLH+fn3c6q9m4= =xw+u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 20:03:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8BE16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:03:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A05643D48 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:03:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A392460E4; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:03:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53384-07; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:03:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [63.117.97.221]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7DA60DB; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:03:45 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <42544099.4050708@makeworld.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:03:37 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Davour References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Domainname X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:03:51 -0000 Andreas Davour wrote: > > I didn't think when I was doing my last install, and now my system has > a domainname it shouldn't have. > > Too many different operating systems compete for space in my brain and > I can't seem to find any information about "fully qualified > domainname" in the fine manual, since all it talks about is NIS/YP, > which isn't my problem. > > Any hints? > > /andreas > Rerun sysinstall, then configure, then network, then interfaces, then pick your nic - the rest you ought to be able to manage. Best regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 20:04:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A210616A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:04:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prosporo.hedron.org (hedron.org [66.11.182.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4006743D53 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:04:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ean@hedron.org) Received: from www.hedron.org (localhost.hedron.org [127.0.0.1]) by prosporo.hedron.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27208C132; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:05:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 216.220.59.169 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ean); by www.hedron.org with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:05:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4854.216.220.59.169.1112817917.squirrel@216.220.59.169> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:05:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ean Kingston" To: "Andreas Davour" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Domainname X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:04:21 -0000 > > I didn't think when I was doing my last install, and now my system has a > domainname it shouldn't have. > > Too many different operating systems compete for space in my brain and I > can't seem to find any information about "fully qualified domainname" in > the fine manual, since all it talks about is NIS/YP, which isn't my > problem. > > Any hints? Have a look at /etc/rc.conf (the hostname setting). -- Ean Kingston E-Mail: ean_AT_hedron_DOT_org PGP KeyID: 1024D/CBC5D6BB URL: http://www.hedron.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 20:06:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A84C16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:06:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sys15.mail.msu.edu (sys15.mail.msu.edu [35.9.75.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF43843D2F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:06:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@msu.edu) Received: from jerrymc by sys15.mail.msu.edu with local (Exim 4.44 #1) id 1DJGmw-0007Ph-TC; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:06:10 -0400 References: In-Reply-To: From: "Jerold McAllister" To: Andreas Davour Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:06:09 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Domainname X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:06:12 -0000 Andreas Davour writes: > I didn't think when I was doing my last install, and now my system has a > domainname it shouldn't have. > > Too many different operating systems compete for space in my brain and I > can't seem to find any information about "fully qualified domainname" in > the fine manual, since all it talks about is NIS/YP, which isn't my > problem. > Any hints? Well, you don't say quite what you want to know about "fully qualified" domain name. It means the full name xxx.yyy.zzz.org instead of just xxx or whatever. As for changing it, change the hostname="xx.yy.zz.org" in your /etc/rc.conf file and the domain in /etc/resolv.conf. ////jerry > > /andreas > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 21:01:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2FB16A4CE; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:01:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (ns1.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E2D43D1F; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:01:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.tsgincorporated.com [127.0.0.1]) by smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5222C3CD706; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:01:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 57633-04; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:01:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.tsgincorporated.com (lanmail.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.29]) by smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CF03CD704; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:01:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from micheal (micheal.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.77]) by mail.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E3E4952827; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:01:51 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <123901c53aec$259d8420$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: "Justin Bennett" , "FreeBSD Hackers" References: <4251C00E.1050108@z-axis.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:58:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tsgincorporated.com cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: iSCSI (revisited?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:01:59 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin Bennett" To: "FreeBSD Hackers" Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 5:30 PM Subject: iSCSI (revisited?) > All, > > I was wondering what people thought of iSCSI and FreeBSD. Is it a viable > option for creating SANs? > > I want to move away from tape backups, and have numerous production > FreeBSD machines that I need to back up data from. > > Any other ideas for a disk to disk backup solution that people have used? > > Thanks, > > Justin > Justin, what I'm currently using is the following for just that: Promise Vtrak 15100 with 15 250gb sata's, connected to a dual channel Adaptec 39160 housed in a Compaq ML 330 running FreeBSD 5.3. The Vtrak has 2 logical arrays assigned, where my other 14 servers (windows and freebsd alike) back up to one or the other arrays. I have one array shared via nfs for the bsd boxes to back up to and the other is samba shared so that windows systems can back up to that one. So far, it's worked well for me. All I need to do now is get the company to realize they still need tape if they want long term storage and then I can chain that to the Promise raid and have it back up to take during the day and still have my backup window in the early morning hours. -- Micheal Patterson Senior Communications Systems Engineer 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 21:39:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C4B16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:39:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk (mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk [212.104.129.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1135043D1F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:39:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew@ugh.net.au) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7EA1337CB for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:39:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23127-01-48 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:39:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (paivi.ugh.net.au [82.152.227.101]) by mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFDB1339A7 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:39:39 +0100 (BST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Andrew Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:39:38 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by Eclipse VIRUSshield at eclipse.net.uk Subject: Temperature Sensors on a Mini-ITX Board X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:39:42 -0000 Does anyone know how to read the temperature sensors on a VIA Mini-ITX board? I've tried xmbmon, lmmon and healthd but nothing seems to read it/them. I can't find anything under the dev sysctl hierachy either. I can't see anything relevant in dmesg apart from this perhaps: acpi0: on motherboard Thanks, Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 22:18:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C78016A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:18:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay15-f25.bay15.hotmail.com [65.54.185.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E51543D39 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:18:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iain_dooley@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:18:15 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 220.237.12.31 by by15fd.bay15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 22:18:14 GMT X-Originating-IP: [220.237.12.31] X-Originating-Email: [iain_dooley@hotmail.com] X-Sender: iain_dooley@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <44hdil8bn2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> From: "Iain Dooley" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 03:18:14 +0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2005 22:18:15.0212 (UTC) FILETIME=[870DC6C0:01C53AF6] Subject: Re: Maintaining a Minimal Installation for a Small HDD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 22:18:15 -0000 hi lowell, >The recommended path is to do a binary upgrade. 5.4 will be out in a >few weeks, and release candidate builds are available now. to what extent does building the sources on my machine affect the resulting binaries? to be more specific: i read the freebsd handbook section on maintaining multiple systems from one 'build machine'. if i were to allocate one of the machines on my network to build sources into binaries, say my HP PII, would those binaries be appropriate to install on my thinkpad? my understanding is that i could take a subset of those binaries and install them on my laptop, and then build the kernel from the thinkpad and this would work (assuming i got all the binaries right). is that correct? cheers iain _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 22:21:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176A216A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:21:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADC943D1D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:21:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pergesu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 37so395952wra for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:21:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=T8UndPTejR9fattd+0+WMtnjkEXhJVj9tkRXiNYqj+3AfwbDOr1idac9asDCvruOz12fsIxX+9hq1B8RyLaJ5YkVhAVO1bBRw15KW8hQr/yNvXp8i21lNXMJErGFwezkmV3Q95drTT8mcr0TH/Pxdo4wFXm4ICIwfGuSj6hva+4= Received: by 10.54.25.60 with SMTP id 60mr237214wry; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.42.28 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <810a540e050406152124462c81@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:21:11 -0600 From: Pat Maddox To: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <44hdil8bn2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Subject: Re: Maintaining a Minimal Installation for a Small HDD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pat Maddox List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 22:21:12 -0000 Yep, that's pretty much right. Use one of the systems to build everything as packages, and then install all those packages onto your other machines. You'll still need to compile the kernel and source on each individual machine. On Apr 6, 2005 4:18 PM, Iain Dooley wrote: > hi lowell, > > >The recommended path is to do a binary upgrade. 5.4 will be out in a > >few weeks, and release candidate builds are available now. > > to what extent does building the sources on my machine affect the resulting > binaries? to be more specific: > > i read the freebsd handbook section on maintaining multiple systems from one > 'build machine'. if i were to allocate one of the machines on my network to > build sources into binaries, say my HP PII, would those binaries be > appropriate to install on my thinkpad? my understanding is that i could take > a subset of those binaries and install them on my laptop, and then build the > kernel from the thinkpad and this would work (assuming i got all the > binaries right). is that correct? > > cheers > > iain > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 22:35:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7647D16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:35:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C824E43D45 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:35:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptroot@iaces.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-66-41-36-48.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[66.41.36.48]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005040622352801300a8nmbe>; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:35:28 +0000 Message-ID: <4254642E.9020306@iaces.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 17:35:26 -0500 From: Paul Root User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shea Frederick , questions@freebsd.org References: <6bd74b4b05040612163e0dcc88@mail.gmail.com> <42543BB3.1000202@iaces.com> <6bd74b4b050406131256e027b7@mail.gmail.com> <4254466F.80909@iaces.com> <6bd74b4b0504061514550292a1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6bd74b4b0504061514550292a1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: unable to mount secondary hard disks now X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 22:35:33 -0000 I just noticed, this isn't going to the group. Always, keep the thread with the group. I don't know everything. In fact, I haven't done usb disks on FreeBSD. Anyway, there's a couple of disturbing things here. 1. You need to find out which drive is which. Because, what we do could be distructive to the disk. Especially if it's not the disk you think it is. Run dmesg and look for the da device references, maybe that will give you an idea as to which disk is which. Ok, let's assume for a minute that da2 became da1. That would explain why the disklabel is wrong. Since it was configured as da2c not da2s1c. try disklabel da1 disklabel da2 disklabel da1s1 disklabel da2s1 mount let's see what's what. 2. That disklabel is wrong. That's why you can't access the partition. Back in the old days, it was frowned upon to use 'C' as a live filesystem. It was always the whole disk. I generally will make an 'a' or 'e' or something that is also the whole disk There are 2 problems with this disklabel, if it is the right disk. 1. The file type is unused. It should be 4.2BSD 2. The C partition extends past the end of the unit. That's probably because it starts at 63 instead of 0. Which actually leads me to believe that this is the old da2. Run the dmesg, disklabels and mount for us (the whole list, I can easily miss things). And see if we can't figure out what drive is what. Paul. Shea Frederick wrote: >FileServer# disklabel /dev/da1s1c ># /dev/da1s1c: >8 partitions: ># size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > c: 156296322 63 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, >don't edit >partition c: partition extends past end of unit >disklabel: partition c doesn't start at 0! >disklabel: An incorrect partition c may cause problems for standard >system utilities > >but something else interesting came up while i was poking around.....I >went to write some files to my da2 drive, and noticed that the access >light on drive da1 was blinking. So somehow after re-booting, my da1 >and da2 drives switched places (i sware i didnt switch the cables) > >-Shea > > >On Apr 6, 2005 2:28 PM, Paul T. Root wrote: > > >>Ok, so that was a bad guess. >> >>The disk may have gotten wiped. You can try running >>fsck with the next superblock. >> >>fsck -b 32 /dev/da1s1c >> >>What does disklabel give you? >>disklabel da1s1 >> >> >>Shea Frederick wrote: >> >> >>>The first drive (da0) was setup using the instructions here... >>> >>>http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/formatting-media/article.html >>> >>>The 2nd drive (da1) was setup using sysinstall >>> >>>come to think of it, thats the only difference, so maybee thats part >>>of the problem. >>> >>>I have no da1s4c >>> >>>FileServer# ll /dev/da* >>>crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 19 Apr 6 22:59 /dev/da0 >>>crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 23 Apr 6 17:01 /dev/da0c >>>crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 20 Apr 6 22:59 /dev/da1 >>>crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 65 Apr 6 22:59 /dev/da1a >>>crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 66 Apr 6 22:59 /dev/da1c >>>crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 34 Apr 6 22:59 /dev/da1s1 >>>crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 55 Apr 6 22:59 /dev/da1s1c >>>crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 21 Apr 7 04:38 /dev/da2 >>>crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 69 Apr 7 04:39 /dev/da2c >>> >>>I forgot to mention that drive 3 (setup just like da0) also works fine >>> >>>-Shea >>> >>> >>>On Apr 6, 2005 1:42 PM, Paul T. Root wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>I'm not entirely sure, but it sure looks like da1s4c to me. >>>> >>>>Why is one drive da0c and the other da1s1c? How did you set them >>>>up? >>>> >>>>Shea Frederick wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Im running FreeBSD 5.3, its an almost fresh install. Its been running >>>>>for about 7 days now. I have an internal IDE drive that the OS runs >>>>>from, then I have two external firewire drives (da0, da1) that are >>>>>only used as Samba shares. >>>>> >>>>>This morning i found that one of the firewire drives are no longer >>>>>mounted (da1), this might have happened when I uninstalled Samba 2.x >>>>>and installed 3.x yesterday, then rebooted. but im not sure, because i >>>>>didnt check to see if the drive was still mounted after the reboot. >>>>> >>>>>So i figured i would just mount it again (even though da1 in the fstab).... >>>>> >>>>>FileServer# mount /dev/da1s1c /mnt/jabba >>>>>mount: /dev/da1s1c on /mnt/jabba: incorrect super block >>>>> >>>>>So now im not realy sure what to do, this drive was working perfectly >>>>>before the reboot. >>>>> >>>>>someone told me to run fsck on the drive, but that gives me the following error. >>>>> >>>>>FileServer# fsck /dev/da1s1c >>>>>** /dev/da1s1c >>>>>Cannot find file system superblock >>>>>/dev/da1s1c: NOT LABELED AS A BSD FILE SYSTEM (unused) >>>>> >>>>>here is what fdisk returns... >>>>> >>>>>FileServer# fdisk /dev/da1s1c >>>>>******* Working on device /dev/da1s1c ******* >>>>>parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: >>>>>cylinders=9728 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) >>>>> >>>>>Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 >>>>>parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: >>>>>cylinders=9728 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) >>>>> >>>>>Media sector size is 512 >>>>>Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 >>>>>Information from DOS bootblock is: >>>>>The data for partition 1 is: >>>>> >>>>>The data for partition 2 is: >>>>> >>>>>The data for partition 3 is: >>>>> >>>>>The data for partition 4 is: >>>>>sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) >>>>> start 0, size 50000 (24 Meg), flag 80 (active) >>>>> beg: cyl 0/ head 0/ sector 1; >>>>> end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 >>>>> >>>>>Here are the relevant lines from my fstab... >>>>>/dev/da0c /mnt/yoda ufs rw 2 2 >>>>>/dev/da1s1c /mnt/jabba ufs rw 2 2 >>>>> >>>>>Thanks in advance >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 23:02:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E963E16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:02:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net (ptb-relay02.plus.net [212.159.14.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743EC43D39 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:02:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian@codepad.net) Received: from [80.229.159.44] (helo=hercules.codepad.net) by ptb-relay02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1DJJXg-0002Vs-3q for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 23:02:36 +0000 From: Xian To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 00:02:35 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504070002.35356.ian@codepad.net> Subject: Re: Change console resolotion [was: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 23:02:38 -0000 On Wednesday 06 April 2005 20:17, gfdggdfg fdgdret wrote: > hello!! > > > how do you feel? > > I'm rookie to use freebsd. > > I have a question. How I can change my resolution of my consola. I use > freebsd 5.3 on laptop, just I want to know how I can change that resolution > 640x400 "something like that" > to a 1024x768. how I change. thks > > I wish you can help me to do it I think vidcontrol is what you are looking for. `man vidcontrol` for more info. -- /Xian "You're not fully trained until you have done everything wrong once" Martin Stannard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 00:30:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622B316A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 00:30:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ptb-relay03.plus.net (ptb-relay03.plus.net [212.159.14.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2029043D3F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 00:30:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian@codepad.net) Received: from [80.229.159.44] (helo=hercules.codepad.net) by ptb-relay03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1DJKuu-0004Qf-Jj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:30:40 +0000 From: Xian To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 01:30:40 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504070130.40305.ian@codepad.net> Subject: sending mail between local computers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:30:45 -0000 I have two FreeBSD boxes running sendmail, how would make it so mail can be sent from one box to the other? I have just managed to make them masquerade so I can send mail out on to the Internet. I did come across this on my 'quest': http://www.clanger9.org.uk/computer/explain.html ;-) -- /Xian "C lets you shoot yourself in the foot. C++ lets you reuse the bullet" Unknown Author From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 01:18:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044D016A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 01:18:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2238643D39 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 01:18:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from frambozen (frambozen [192.168.1.9]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA81510; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:18:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:19:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Hill To: Xian In-Reply-To: <200504070130.40305.ian@codepad.net> Message-ID: <20050406210809.Y65233@frambozen.monochrome.org> References: <200504070130.40305.ian@codepad.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sending mail between local computers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 01:18:24 -0000 On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Xian wrote: > I have two FreeBSD boxes running sendmail, how would make it so mail > can be sent from one box to the other? Assuming they are both on your local network, as suggested in the subject... You shouldn't have to do anything with sendmail. Just configure the machines so each hostnames resolves, from the perspective of the other machine. You could either create an /etc/hosts file on each machine, or run DNS locally. Probably other ways as well. Let's say that their hostnames are foo and bar - make it so that from foo you can 'ping bar', and vice versa. Once that works, you ought to be able to log in to foo and send mail via your favorite MUA to 'ian@bar' - note, that's just bar, not bar.com or anything. Likewise you ought to be able to log in to bar and send mail via your favorite MUA to 'ian@foo'. Assuming the user exists on both machines, of course. I'm doing something like this with my internal mail at home, and it works fine. > http://www.clanger9.org.uk/computer/explain.html Cute. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 01:22:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC4716A4CE; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 01:22:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from onenetom19.sge.net (onenetom19.sge.net [152.91.1.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE7B43D1F; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 01:21:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au) Received: from onenetvs10.sge.net (onenetvs-om [152.91.1.17]) by onenetom19.sge.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4CEACDC; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:21:53 +1000 (EST) Received: from onenetvs10.sge.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B5294BE1; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:22:07 +1000 (EST) Received: from onenetim3.sge.net (unknown [152.91.1.9]) by onenetvs10.sge.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D71694BD8; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:22:07 +1000 (EST) Received: from guinness.lyn.gwy (unknown [152.91.9.242]) by onenetim3.sge.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D2FDDA9CD; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:21:51 +1000 (EST) Received: from vmail.aipo.gov.au (mail-in.ipa.lyn.gwy [192.168.254.253]) by guinness.lyn.gwy with ESMTP id j371Lsnt019607; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:21:54 +1000 (EST) Received: from xena.aipo.gov.au (xena.aipo.gov.au [10.0.100.52]) by vmail.aipo.gov.au (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j371LroR021907; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:21:53 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au) Received: from [10.0.100.18] (newton.aipo.gov.au [10.0.100.18]) by xena.aipo.gov.au (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j371Ln6W093635; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:21:53 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from carl@xena.ipaustralia.gov.au) Message-ID: <42548B2D.9010503@xena.ipaustralia.gov.au> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:21:49 +1000 From: Carl Makin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050314) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eugene Mitrofanov References: <200504061842.43294.eugene@imedia.ru> In-Reply-To: <200504061842.43294.eugene@imedia.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 10.0.100.191 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IBM eServer 346 ServeRaid is too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 01:22:00 -0000 Hi Eugene, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote: >I've got Subj and FreeBSD-5.4PRE on it. But RAID0 is too slow: >root@beta:eugene# dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/tmp/1 bs=1m count=100 >100+0 records in >100+0 records out >104857600 bytes transferred in 31.949508 secs (3281979 bytes/sec) > >mpt0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem >0xcffe0000-0xcffeffff,0xcfff0000-0xcfffffff irq 28 at device 1.0 on pci4 > > >da0 at mpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 >da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >da0: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing >Enabled >da0: 34678MB (71020544 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4420C) > > I'd say you are seeing the same as I am with the same card in a Dell 1855. There is something wrong with the mpt driver and the disks when they are setup in a raid0 set. If you split the disks and use them as individual drives then you will get full performance. Carl. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 01:42:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C994116A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 01:42:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.foolishgames.com (mail.foolishgames.com [216.55.178.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6967D43D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 01:42:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luke@foolishgames.com) Received: from [192.168.0.49] (24.247.120.6.kzo.mi.chartermi.net [24.247.120.6]) (authenticated bits=0)j371gkZb071429 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:42:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luke@foolishgames.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.foolishgames.com: Host 24.247.120.6.kzo.mi.chartermi.net [24.247.120.6] claimed to be [192.168.0.49] X-Habeas-Swe-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) X-Habeas-Swe-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-Swe-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-Swe-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-Swe-1: winter into spring Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <579568ebf7e3fa304e005e7692765c94@foolishgames.com> X-Habeas-Swe-9: mark in spam to . X-Habeas-Swe-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Lucas Holt X-Habeas-Swe-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-Swe-2: brightly anticipated Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:42:26 -0400 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) Subject: nvraid setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 01:42:48 -0000 I recently purchased a msi motherboard with an nforce 2 chipset. It has nvraid support. Is it possible to use it in freebsd? If so, can it be used as a boot volume? I've attempted a boot with a 5.3 release cd and found that it detects the two drives individually. i'm trying to do raid 0 across 2 SATA disks. My goal is to setup a home file/print server. I'd even consider using software raid if i can't get the nvraid to work. Is it possible to create a bootable software raid setup in freebsd? I do have an old 10 gig drive i could through in for a root partition in a pinch but i'd like to stick to the new sata disks if possible. Thanks. Please CC me as i'm not on the list. Lucas Holt Luke@FoolishGames.com ________________________________________________________ FoolishGames.com (Jewel Fan Site) JustJournal.com (Free blogging) FoolishGames.net (Enemy Territory IoM site) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 03:47:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AB116A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 03:47:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B587443D41 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 03:47:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beau@billbeau.net) Received: from ws2.billbeau.net (c-24-6-130-139.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.130.139]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <20050407034658013000l3a3e>; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 03:46:58 +0000 From: Bill To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 06 Apr 2005 21:44:26 -0700 Message-Id: <1112849066.22153.19.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: multiprocessors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 03:47:02 -0000 Is there a comand to use so as to see if freebsd is using both processors? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 03:49:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE7316A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 03:49:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2E943D2F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 03:49:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beau@billbeau.net) Received: from ws2.billbeau.net (c-24-6-130-139.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.130.139]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <2005040703493501200rs3ile>; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 03:49:36 +0000 From: Bill To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 06 Apr 2005 21:47:01 -0700 Message-Id: <1112849222.22155.22.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: xorg -configure fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 03:49:39 -0000 Im trying to install Xorg. I get an error message "failed to open /dev/io for extended IO" Any help? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 03:59:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7A716A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 03:59:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931D943D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 03:59:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DJO8J-0004mz-68 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 05:56:43 +0200 Received: from 63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net ([63.224.222.139]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 05:56:43 +0200 Received: from sergei by 63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 05:56:43 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Sergei Gnezdov Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:49:00 -0700 Lines: 4 Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: What's the definition of the stale port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: sergei@gnezdov.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 03:59:16 -0000 What is stale port? How do I end up having stale ports? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 04:04:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39A216A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:04:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A729D43D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:04:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from free.bsd@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Apr 2005 04:04:49 -0000 Received: from pD9E7ED36.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.2.101]) [217.231.237.54] by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 07 Apr 2005 06:04:49 +0200 X-Authenticated: #20105305 Message-ID: <4254B432.7070401@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:16:50 +0800 From: FreeBSD Deamon User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill References: <1112849066.22153.19.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> In-Reply-To: <1112849066.22153.19.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multiprocessors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 04:04:51 -0000 Bill wrote: >Is there a comand to use so as to see if freebsd is using both >processors? > > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > try top(1) the output of top should contain a "C" column. if this column contains "0"s and "1"s both your CPUs are used zheyu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 04:13:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4150B16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:13:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1123D43D2D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:13:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E0C1151343; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:12:59 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: sergei@gnezdov.net Message-ID: <20050407041259.GA69275@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's the definition of the stale port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 04:13:01 -0000 --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 08:49:00PM -0700, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > What is stale port? It's not entirely clear what context you're talking about, but the answer is probably "One for which a newer version is available." > How do I end up having stale ports? As time marches on :-) Kris --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCVLNLWry0BWjoQKURAv5OAKDAExqg47lwgzoLAEPb5pOkNeQusgCeISMm L07NEEfYqR11CFj6wlc82P8= =eYe4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 04:13:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F52116A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:13:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB3F43D53 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:13:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j374DE7s038091; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:13:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:13:14 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Bill Message-ID: <20050407041314.GM64927@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1112849222.22155.22.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1112849222.22155.22.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xorg -configure fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 04:13:16 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 06), Bill said: > Im trying to install Xorg. I get an error message "failed to open > /dev/io for extended IO" First check: Do you have a /dev/io device? Make sure you haven't removed "device io" from your kernel config file. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 04:18:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16E316A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:18:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-04.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B63A843D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:18:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: (qmail 1153 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2005 04:18:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warren.shinji.nq.nu) (203.217.81.22) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 7 Apr 2005 04:18:50 -0000 From: Warren To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:16:57 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504071416.57580.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Subject: Sound Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 04:18:52 -0000 I upgraded my ports/src/kernel yesterday and after i rebooted i no longer have any sound installed. Being as i have onboard sound and honestly have no idea the chipset the sound uses etc .. i was wondering if someone could give me a guide to how to get my sound back and working? -- Yours Sincerely Shinjii http://www.shinji.nq.nu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 04:37:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC6316A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:37:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C8343D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:37:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beau@billbeau.net) Received: from ws2.billbeau.net (c-24-6-130-139.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.130.139]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <2005040704371801400f961de>; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:37:18 +0000 From: Bill To: FreeBSD Deamon In-Reply-To: <4254B432.7070401@gmx.net> References: <1112849066.22153.19.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> <4254B432.7070401@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 06 Apr 2005 22:34:43 -0700 Message-Id: <1112852084.22155.27.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multiprocessors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 04:37:21 -0000 There is a line for cpu put it only shows one. Im used to linux and when I do a top in Linux I see two lines for my cpus. Is the stock kernel that gets installed when doing a new install smp enabled? Do i need to rebuild my kernel for smp? On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 21:16, FreeBSD Deamon wrote: > Bill wrote: > > >Is there a comand to use so as to see if freebsd is using both > >processors? > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > try top(1) > > the output of top should contain a "C" column. if this column contains > "0"s and "1"s both your CPUs are used > > zheyu > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 04:39:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA0516A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:39:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC1843D49 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:39:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8448951343; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:39:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:39:19 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Bill Message-ID: <20050407043919.GA72331@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1112849066.22153.19.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> <4254B432.7070401@gmx.net> <1112852084.22155.27.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1112852084.22155.27.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: FreeBSD Deamon cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multiprocessors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 04:39:20 -0000 --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 10:34:43PM -0700, Bill wrote: > There is a line for cpu put it only shows one. Im used to linux and when > I do a top in Linux I see two lines for my cpus. >=20 > Is the stock kernel that gets installed when doing a new install smp > enabled? No (on i386). > Do i need to rebuild my kernel for smp? Yes, see the handbook. Kris --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCVLl3Wry0BWjoQKURAlY2AJ9LRuhagCpTgHyu3E1vFQAm6K35XACeOd4N ZunHWBjUeIB353wyGbnwitk= =4MIW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 04:40:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0DB16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:40:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC18D43D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:40:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beau@billbeau.net) Received: from ws2.billbeau.net (c-24-6-130-139.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.130.139]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <20050407043957013000ncf8e>; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:39:57 +0000 From: Bill To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050407041314.GM64927@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1112849222.22155.22.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> <20050407041314.GM64927@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 06 Apr 2005 22:37:25 -0700 Message-Id: <1112852245.26173.34.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xorg -configure fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 04:40:02 -0000 I found it. seems that xorkcfg doesnt like security. I removed two lines from my rc.conf file one for security enable and the other for security level. weird that it wouldnt alow root access to dev/io On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 21:13, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Apr 06), Bill said: > > Im trying to install Xorg. I get an error message "failed to open > > /dev/io for extended IO" > > First check: Do you have a /dev/io device? Make sure you haven't > removed "device io" from your kernel config file. > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 04:42:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A92416A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:42:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD5543D46 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:42:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beau@billbeau.net) Received: from ws2.billbeau.net (c-24-6-130-139.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.130.139]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <2005040704420901100fpkfoe>; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:42:09 +0000 From: Bill To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050407043919.GA72331@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1112849066.22153.19.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> <1112852084.22155.27.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> <20050407043919.GA72331@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 06 Apr 2005 22:39:35 -0700 Message-Id: <1112852376.26173.37.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: multiprocessors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 04:42:13 -0000 Well then maybe i should build a new kernel then. Im running freeBSD 5.3 on a dual 450mhz Compaq Proliant 3000 On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 21:39, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 10:34:43PM -0700, Bill wrote: > > There is a line for cpu put it only shows one. Im used to linux and when > > I do a top in Linux I see two lines for my cpus. > > > > Is the stock kernel that gets installed when doing a new install smp > > enabled? > > No (on i386). > > > Do i need to rebuild my kernel for smp? > > Yes, see the handbook. > > Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 04:55:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8A216A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:55:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7075243D54 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:55:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fadeaway@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so419859wra for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:55:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject:date:x-mailer; b=p1V4rN7LttFchcVJr3iCvOqQ1ElivI+vAmW5xB4lpRAPASdPpY/dKVTcBWUmak7sJOJ5lqNKbsZVHbOhs3A+wFGgMoVGCN8T2ISc4UuwrzWD/iE2vsho2fjrUWYIUHfy2t/kBV6drsDyP1b9ZeQ6hJUC31sdcFqAdxpmOBxp1Sg= Received: by 10.54.50.73 with SMTP id x73mr256002wrx; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.10.105? ([151.205.171.43]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 45sm1276253wri.2005.04.06.21.55.24; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: fadeaway@gmail.com Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 00:55:21 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) Subject: old compaq 4840 problems - freebsd 4.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 04:55:30 -0000 I have a old compaq presario 4840. I want to install freebsd 5.3 onto it but it just won't install... It boots the installation and process everything accordingly until when it starts to format the disk and starts installing... First off I notice it has problems fsck, it will error with a message like could not fsck something /xxxxx /mnt/xxxxx. Sorry I forgot to write down the exact message. Then it will tell me it is preparing an emergency holo shell? It will then proceed to try and install from (CD/FTP- tried both) and toward the end of the install it will error and tell it is going to reboot or i can enter a command prompt. But! on freebsd 4.11 and previous versions I remember worked fine. Same thing with Openbsd 3.x and netbsd 2.0 installations... Any ideas? I really want to give freebsd 5.3 a go... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 05:13:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A197516A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 05:13:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web81107.mail.yahoo.com (web81107.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E367A43D39 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 05:13:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wyderka@sbcglobal.net) Message-ID: <20050407051323.88481.qmail@web81107.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.215.132.240] by web81107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 22:13:23 PDT Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:13:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew & Alissa Wyderka To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Windows XP & Partition Magic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 05:13:24 -0000 Can FreeBSD be installed if I use Partition Magic. I am currently running on Windows XP environment. (That is the only primary partition) ..If so how..I keep getting error messages "Could not find Primary Descriptor"..when installing FreeBSD from CD. Am I partitioning wrong, or is XP not compatable? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 05:29:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B93116A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 05:29:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E7143D31 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 05:29:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DJPXb-0002n6-4F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 07:26:55 +0200 Received: from 63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net ([63.224.222.139]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 07:26:55 +0200 Received: from sergei by 63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 07:26:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Sergei Gnezdov Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:22:46 -0700 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <20050407041259.GA69275@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: What's the definition of the stale port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: sergei@gnezdov.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 05:29:19 -0000 On 2005-04-07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 08:49:00PM -0700, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: >> What is stale port? > > It's not entirely clear what context you're talking about, but the > answer is probably "One for which a newer version is available." I'd say that installed port is stale if its version is older then the version of the port in the /usr/ports/ >> How do I end up having stale ports? > > As time marches on :-) I am guessing, that port becomes stale after running cvsup. So, what exactly are we supposed to accomplish in respect to stale ports, when we run pkgdb -F (deinstall, some kind of fix, simple ignore)? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 06:12:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4921516A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:12:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-04-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F81E43D2F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:12:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (cpe-065-184-201-054.ec.res.rr.com [65.184.201.54])j376CgL4022057; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 02:12:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4254D1B1.9070106@ec.rr.com> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 02:22:41 -0400 From: jason henson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050321) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lucas Holt References: <579568ebf7e3fa304e005e7692765c94@foolishgames.com> In-Reply-To: <579568ebf7e3fa304e005e7692765c94@foolishgames.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: nvraid setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:12:47 -0000 Lucas Holt wrote: > I recently purchased a msi motherboard with an nforce 2 chipset. It > has nvraid support. Is it possible to use it in freebsd? If so, can > it be used as a boot volume? > > I've attempted a boot with a 5.3 release cd and found that it detects > the two drives individually. i'm trying to do raid 0 across 2 SATA > disks. > > My goal is to setup a home file/print server. I'd even consider using > software raid if i can't get the nvraid to work. Is it possible to > create a bootable software raid setup in freebsd? > > I do have an old 10 gig drive i could through in for a root partition > in a pinch but i'd like to stick to the new sata disks if possible. > > Thanks. > > Please CC me as i'm not on the list. > > Lucas Holt > Luke@FoolishGames.com > ________________________________________________________ IIRC, there is no support fo the nvraid. You would just use vinum. It is in the base system, check man vinum or the handbook. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 06:20:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F6216A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:20:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA64043D31 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:20:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521CA5E64; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 02:20:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 49934-09; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 02:20:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-53-96.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.53.96]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8EF5DD7; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 02:19:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4254D0B8.1060303@mac.com> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 02:18:32 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sergei@gnezdov.net References: <20050407041259.GA69275@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's the definition of the stale port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:20:03 -0000 Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > On 2005-04-07, Kris Kennaway wrote: [ ... ] >>> How do I end up having stale ports? >> >> As time marches on :-) > > I am guessing, that port becomes stale after running cvsup. When a new version of a port is committed, anyone running the older version has a stale version. Whether you run cvsup or not doesn't affect whether a new version is available, but you are a lot more likely to notice dependency issues after running cvsup. > So, what exactly are we supposed to accomplish in respect to stale > ports, when we run pkgdb -F (deinstall, some kind of fix, simple > ignore)? pkgdb tries to update the dependencies when new versions of a port appear. Running pkgdb by itself is not especially useful, although you can check and rebuild updated ports by hand. Consider portupgrade instead.... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 06:35:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFEDB16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:35:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF88643D2D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:35:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from free.bsd@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Apr 2005 06:35:56 -0000 Received: from pD9E7ED36.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.2.101]) [217.231.237.54] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 07 Apr 2005 08:35:56 +0200 X-Authenticated: #20105305 Message-ID: <4254D79E.4030503@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:47:58 +0800 From: FreeBSD Deamon User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: ath(4) sysctl tuneables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:35:58 -0000 dear list, I own a ath(4) card and would be interested in information about the the meaning of these ath sysctl tueables. Which can be changed? Which values can these changeable tuneables take? hw.ath.hal.dma_brt: 2 hw.ath.hal.sw_brt: 10 hw.ath.hal.swba_backoff: 0 hw.ath.dwell: 200 hw.ath.calibrate: 30 hw.ath.outdoor: 1 hw.ath.countrycode: 0 hw.ath.regdomain: 0 hw.ath.debug: 0 hw.ath.dump: If hw.ath.debug is set then here do the debug messages go? TIA zheyu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 06:40:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99AE16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:40:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CB043D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:40:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gjbailey@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so439521wra for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 23:40:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=hR1vrTx/2vZ2WZ1meFZVUvxyzM3YEzhNjj+q+7y/1V5EsCaWUfrIcRHtL33ZxZIrePr9743r1OiEIxsX4GQ7iaZio8VZSrx0SbImyEBOr5mvod4qzPCkJIJGu0Rt6U8HufrcBeXettM8FFAAkrV1lb8OQAjh1TVuoHEI1gXjJ50= Received: by 10.54.32.67 with SMTP id f67mr811912wrf; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 23:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.83.20 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48a5f32a050406234063d6ae9c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:40:29 +0200 From: Gareth Bailey To: estover@nativenerds.com, freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <1112834326.7040.6.camel@red.nativenerds.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <48a5f32a050405031350803bb2@mail.gmail.com> <1112738964.3137.21.camel@red.nativenerds.com> <48a5f32a0504060041316664bb@mail.gmail.com> <1112834326.7040.6.camel@red.nativenerds.com> Subject: Re: Copying files off Samba Server - freezes/very slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gareth Bailey List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:40:30 -0000 Hi Ed, What version of FreeBSD are you running ? I'm running the i386 4.11 stable release What are you hardware specs? Gigabyte K8VM800M MB, 512 DDR 400 Memory, AMD Sempron Socket 754 2600+, 3com managed NIC (uses xl0 driver) What version of windows is running on your clients? Win XP SP2 do you use dynamic dns and or wins? Ok.. i'm not too clued up with this response, but i have nothing fancy going on here - std settings (..let me know if you need more info!) Thanks for your help, Regards, Gareth On Apr 7, 2005 2:38 AM, Ed Stover wrote: > I don't see any thing that would cause the slowness you described > earlier. What version of FreeBSD are you running ? What are you hardware > specs? What version of windows is running on your clients? do you use > dynamic dns and or wins? > On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 09:41 +0200, Gareth Bailey wrote: > > Hi Ed, > > > > My smb.conf file follows: > > > > Please let me know if you see anything that could be causing this > > behaviour. I'm running 4.11 release and samba-2.2.8a_2 > > > > Cheers. > > > > # start > > > > # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the > > # smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed > > # here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too > > # many!) most of which are not shown in this example > > # > > # Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash) > > # is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a # > > # for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you > > # may wish to enable > > # > > # NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command "testparm" > > # to check that you have not many any basic syntactic errors. > > # > > #======================= Global Settings ===================================== > > [global] > > > > # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name, eg: REDHAT4 > > workgroup = GREENHOUSE > > > > log level = 10 > > > > # server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field > > server string = UberBSD Server > > > > # This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict > > # connections to machines which are on your local network. The > > # following example restricts access to two C class networks and > > # the "loopback" interface. For more examples of the syntax see > > # the smb.conf man page > > hosts allow = 192.168.0. 127. > > > > # If you want to automatically load your printer list rather > > # than setting them up individually then you'll need this > > load printers = no > > > > # you may wish to override the location of the printcap file > > ; printcap name = /etc/printcap > > > > # on SystemV system setting printcap name to lpstat should allow > > # you to automatically obtain a printer list from the SystemV spool > > # system > > ; printcap name = lpstat > > > > # It should not be necessary to specify the print system type unless > > # it is non-standard. Currently supported print systems include: > > # bsd, sysv, plp, lprng, aix, hpux, qnx > > ; printing = bsd > > > > # Uncomment this if you want a guest account, you must add this to /etc/passwd > > # otherwise the user "nobody" is used > > ; guest account = pcguest > > > > # this tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine > > # that connects > > log file = /var/log/log.%m > > > > # Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb). > > max log size = 50 > > > > # Security mode. Most people will want user level security. See > > # security_level.txt for details. > > security = user > > > > # Use password server option only with security = server > > # The argument list may include: > > # password server = My_PDC_Name [My_BDC_Name] [My_Next_BDC_Name] > > # or to auto-locate the domain controller/s > > # password server = * > > ; password server = > > > > # Note: Do NOT use the now deprecated option of "domain controller" > > # This option is no longer implemented. > > > > # You may wish to use password encryption. Please read > > # ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt in the Samba documentation. > > # Do not enable this option unless you have read those documents > > encrypt passwords = yes > > # null passwords = true > > > > # Using the following line enables you to customise your configuration > > # on a per machine basis. The %m gets replaced with the netbios name > > # of the machine that is connecting > > ; include = /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.%m > > > > # Most people will find that this option gives better performance. > > # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details > > # You may want to add the following on a Linux system: > > # SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > > socket options = TCP_NODELAY > > > > # Configure Samba to use multiple interfaces > > # If you have multiple network interfaces then you must list them > > # here. See the man page for details. > > ; interfaces = 192.168.12.2/24 192.168.13.2/24 > > > > # Browser Control Options: > > # set local master to no if you don't want Samba to become a master > > # browser on your network. Otherwise the normal election rules apply > > local master = yes > > # i turned this on > > > > # OS Level determines the precedence of this server in master browser > > # elections. The default value should be reasonable > > ; os level = 33 > > os level = 65 > > > > # Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser. This > > # allows Samba to collate browse lists between subnets. Don't use this > > # if you already have a Windows NT domain controller doing this job > > ; domain master = yes > > > > # Preferred Master causes Samba to force a local browser election on startup > > # and gives it a slightly higher chance of winning the election > > preferred master = yes > > > > # Enable this if you want Samba to be a domain logon server for > > # Windows95 workstations. > > ; domain logons = yes > > > > # if you enable domain logons then you may want a per-machine or > > # per user logon script > > # run a specific logon batch file per workstation (machine) > > ; logon script = %m.bat > > # run a specific logon batch file per username > > ; logon script = %U.bat > > > > # Where to store roving profiles (only for Win95 and WinNT) > > # %L substitutes for this servers netbios name, %U is username > > # You must uncomment the [Profiles] share below > > ; logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U > > > > # Windows Internet Name Serving Support Section: > > # WINS Support - Tells the NMBD component of Samba to enable it's WINS Server > > ; wins support = yes > > > > # WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client > > # Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both > > ; wins server = w.x.y.z > > > > # WINS Proxy - Tells Samba to answer name resolution queries on > > # behalf of a non WINS capable client, for this to work there must be > > # at least one WINS Server on the network. The default is NO. > > ; wins proxy = yes > > > > # DNS Proxy - tells Samba whether or not to try to resolve NetBIOS names > > # via DNS nslookups. The built-in default for versions 1.9.17 is yes, > > # this has been changed in version 1.9.18 to no. > > dns proxy = no > > > > [template] > > path = /dev/null > > dos filetimes = yes > > dos filetime resolution = yes > > dos filemode = yes > > fake directory create times = yes > > create mask = 0002 > > force directory mode = 0775 > > inherit permissions = Yes > > force group = staff > > force create mode = 0775 > > > > [data] > > ; copy = template > > dos filetimes = yes > > dos filetime resolution = yes > > dos filemode = yes > > fake directory create times = yes > > create mask = 0002 > > force directory mode = 0775 > > inherit permissions = Yes > > force user = www > > force group = staff > > force create mode = 0775 > > ; sub'd above with template contents + force user directive > > path = /usr/local/www/data > > public = no > > guest ok = no > > valid users = a,b,c > > writeable = yes > > printable = no > > > > [ubersoft] > > copy = template > > path = /usr/ubersoft > > public = no > > guest ok = no > > valid users = a,b,c > > writeable = yes > > printable = no > > > > [mirror] > > path = /usr/mirror > > public = no > > guest ok = no > > valid users = a,b,c > > writeable = no > > printable = no > > > > [floppy] > > copy = template > > path = /mnt/floppy > > public = no > > guest ok = no > > valid users = a,b,c > > writeable = yes > > printable = no > > > > # end > > > > On Apr 6, 2005 12:09 AM, Ed Stover wrote: > > > Let us take a look at you smbd.conf, that might help. > > > > > > On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 12:13 +0200, Gareth Bailey wrote: > > > > I have just upgraded the hardware of our development server. I thought > > > > that our file server used to be slow due to slow hardware, but now > > > > that we have upgraded I am a bit puzzled. > > > > > > > > Samba seems to slow or hang (top reports smbd CPU usage as 40%) when > > > > files are copied off the server using windows explorer on the client. > > > > > > > > Can anyone sugeest a reason for this behaviour? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gareth > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 07:02:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2AE16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 07:02:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from da-iict.org (mx.da-iict.org [202.138.119.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFF643D41 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 07:02:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mangesh_bhalerao@da-iict.org) Received: from mail.da-iict.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by da-iict.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id j3772bs29017 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:32:37 +0530 Received: from webmail.da-iict.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.da-iict.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j376uh318169 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:26:43 +0530 Received: from 10.100.56.25 (proxying for 10.100.68.175) (SquirrelMail authenticated user mangesh_bhalerao); by webmail.da-iict.org with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:32:40 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <50905.10.100.56.25.1112857360.squirrel@10.100.56.25> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:32:40 +0530 (IST) From: "Mangesh Bhalerao" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 1 (Highest) Importance: High Subject: Help: Streaming media capture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mangesh_bhalerao@da-iict.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 07:02:43 -0000 Hi everybody, I got a question, if i would like to download a file on my hdd , such as rtsp://folder.something.com/blablabla.rm how to get it download and let me know you i am working behind a webonly firewall which blocks all udp connections as well as i need to have a poxy connecton to access internet. I have tried mplayer ( mplayerhq.hu ) but was not successful because of i guess, the proxy config in mplayer. If you know any other utility and how to use it, please let me know. TIA. Regards ---------------------------------------------------- Mangesh Bhalerao M.Tech. (II nd Sem) DA-IICT ,(www.da-iict.org) Gandhinagar - 382009 Ph#. 9426366185 ------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------- Mangesh Bhalerao M.Tech. (II nd Sem) DA-IICT ,(www.da-iict.org) Gandhinagar - 382009 Ph#. 9426366185 ------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------- Mangesh Bhalerao M.Tech. (II nd Sem) DA-IICT ,(www.da-iict.org) Gandhinagar - 382009 Ph#. 9426366185 ------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 07:41:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED68E16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 07:41:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from allrounder.lame.at (mail.softlink.at [195.58.166.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692A943D2D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 07:41:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from haimat@lame.at) Received: from itchy.lame.at (unknown [213.235.192.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by allrounder.lame.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163FF300FE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:41:44 +0200 (CEST) From: "Matthias F. Brandstetter" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:41:42 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504070941.42684.haimat@lame.at> Subject: how to enable PHP on Apache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 07:41:47 -0000 Hi all, I did a "make install clean" to compile and install phpmyadmin, which installed PHP4 as well. Then I added these lines into my httpd.conf: --------------------------------------------------------------------- ... LoadModule php4_module libexec/apache/libphp4.so ... AddModule mod_php4.c ... DirectoryIndex index.php index.php3 index.html DirectoryIndex index.php3 index.html DirectoryIndex index.php index.html DirectoryIndex index.html ... AddType application/x-httpd-php3 .php3 AddType application/x-httpd-php3-source .php3s AddType application/x-httpd-php .php AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps ... Alias /phpmyadmin /usr/local/www/phpMyAdmin ... --------------------------------------------------------------------- But when I now point my browser to /phpmyadmin, Firefox tells me, it wants to download a PHTML file. And when I point it to /phpmyadmin/index.php, I get a .php file, which Firefox wants to download as well. So, how can I setup Apache/PHP to interpret my php files, instead of sending them 1:1 to the client? Do I miss a configuration here (see above)? Greetings and TIA, Matthias -- And thank you most of all for nuclear power, which is yet to cause a single proven fatality, at least in this country. -- Homer Simpson Oh Brother, Where Art Thou? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 08:16:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5195B16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:16:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cujo.runbox.com (cujo.runbox.com [193.71.199.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43BC43D2F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:16:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mburki@mburki.com) Received: from [10.9.9.9] (helo=fetch.runbox.com) by greyhound.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DJSBJ-00033h-6i for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:16:05 +0200 Received: from mail by fetch.runbox.com with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DJSBD-0004ax-Dm for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:15:59 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from [62.2.92.2] by secure.runbox.com with http (uid:358042) (RMM 4.0); for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:15:59 GMT From: "Manuel Burki" To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:15:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Sender: 358042 X-Mailer: RMM Message-Id: X-Sender: unknown Subject: Re: Windows XP & Partition Magic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:16:09 -0000 > Can FreeBSD be installed if I use Partition Magic. I am currently runnin= g on > Windows XP environment. (That is the only primary partition) ..If so ho= w..I=20 > keep getting error messages "Could not find Primary Descriptor"..when ins= talling > FreeBSD from CD. Am I partitioning wrong, or is XP not compatable? If you're going to run FreeBSD you don't need Windows XP anymore. So the CD installation is quite easy. Just boot from the CD, delete all paritions = and choose "use entire disk". Besides that, the install procedure is quite well explained in the document= ations. regards,=20 Manuel Burki From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 08:25:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE1A16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:25:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wizard.online.ee (wizard.online.ee [194.106.96.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED9E943D1D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:25:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jani@soundflows.com) Received: (qmail 14977 invoked by uid 79); 7 Apr 2005 11:25:02 +0300 Received: from 194.106.123.34 by wizard (envelope-from , uid 78) with qmail-scanner-1.24st (clamdscan: 0.81/704. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24st. Clear:RC:0(194.106.123.34):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.428728 secs); 07 Apr 2005 11:25:02 +2000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?194.106.123.34?) (194.106.123.34) by wizard.online.ee with SMTP; 7 Apr 2005 11:25:02 +0300 Message-ID: <4254EE05.8000302@soundflows.com> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:23:33 +0300 From: Jani Luukkanen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Serial console connection problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:25:05 -0000 Hi! I have an issue with serial console connection with two FreeBSD machines (Both with Intel SE7210TP1-E motherboard, other configured as "host" from bios and other has ordinary com ports which are connected with normal tested serial cable). Host machine is running FreeBSD 5.3 and the "client" one 4.10. Problem is that when trying to open the serial connection with tip, error occurs as; /root@mos root # tip com1 tip: /dev/cuaa0: Device busy link down / /etc/remote file has entry: /sio0|com1:dv=/dev/cuaa0:br#9600:pa=none:/ /var/run/dmesg.boot: /sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A, console / So I assume that the com port generally should be configured properly? Main question is that how to get access first to the com1 port generally and second to get ahold of the remote screen on the other end of the serial cable? Appreciate for any help on this, Cheers, Jani From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 08:40:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8D716A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:40:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hyperreal.org (taz3.hyperreal.org [209.237.226.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0EAC43D55 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:40:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian@hyperreal.org) Received: (qmail 5387 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2005 08:41:02 -0000 Received: from localhost.hyperreal.org (HELO paz.hyperreal.org) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 7 Apr 2005 08:41:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 37203 invoked by uid 1001); 7 Apr 2005 08:42:14 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Apr 2005 08:42:14 -0000 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 01:42:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Behlendorf To: Carl Makin In-Reply-To: <42548B2D.9010503@xena.ipaustralia.gov.au> Message-ID: <20050407013544.W73813@paz.hyperreal.org> References: <200504061842.43294.eugene@imedia.ru> <42548B2D.9010503@xena.ipaustralia.gov.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: localhost.hyperreal.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IBM eServer 346 ServeRaid is too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:40:58 -0000 On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Carl Makin wrote: > I'd say you are seeing the same as I am with the same card in a Dell 1855. > There is something wrong with the mpt driver and the disks when they are > setup in a raid0 set. If you split the disks and use them as individual > drives then you will get full performance. It's also a known problem, though not being tracked very well. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2004-December/001577.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2004-December/001578.html Doesn't look like (from viewcvs.cgi) there's been any recent work on this. Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 08:48:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1566E16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:48:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED4143D58 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:47:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from pooh.nagual.st (pooh.nagual.st [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.st with esmtp; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:47:58 +0200 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:47:59 +0200 From: dick hoogendijk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050407104759.1475f3f0.dick@nagual.st> Organization: nagual SiTe X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: dump question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dick@nagual.st List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:48:05 -0000 Hi, Need some reassurance on this: # dump -h0 -0f - /usr | gzip > /filelocation/filename.dump.gz Will this produce a good dumpfile of "/usr" ? I mean, witghout gzip it would have probably be something like "dump -h0 -0f /filelocation/filename.dump /tmp" am I right? Because I am a little short on space I want to use gzip though. Thanks. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 08:55:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A8516A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:55:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ptb-relay03.plus.net (ptb-relay03.plus.net [212.159.14.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4E343D58 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:55:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=[192.168.7.20]) by ptb-relay03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1DJSnk-000NRC-V8; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:55:49 +0000 Message-ID: <4254F64D.6000002@uk2.net> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:58:53 +0100 From: Graham Bentley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norberto Meijome References: <3.0.6.32.20040617093700.007b1a70@mail.uk2.net> <20040617085132.2ae49db5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <40D24539.1080200@meijome.net> In-Reply-To: <40D24539.1080200@meijome.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Bill Moran cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New user questions :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:55:52 -0000 >> Graham Bentley wrote: >> I also wondered if there is a project based on FreeBSD that >>> achieves similar goals to SME Server (ie all in one LAN server >>> with Web config) or similar to Trustix (ie minimal config with >>> series of scripts to configure server services. >> Not that I know of, but it sure would be a nice project, huh? > > definitely a nice one. > > hmm...what would be the best way to go about it? > - add an option to sysinstall "SME" (well, whatever that would be named > of course) > - add a port that 'depends' / installs all the other ports needed > - with questions and answer to start setting up your system...or > some kind of UI for it (ugh) > - same as with ports, but prec-compiled packages. > > hmm...must download SME to test and see how they went about it. Hi Guys, Iw as wondering how I would even go about starting a project like this using FreeBSD as I know even less than I do about Linux (not much) but I really rate SME and would love to see a FreeBSD version as FreeBSD seems even more suited to this type of thing (ie a stable distro to base a good project on:) Did you get round to checking out SME ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 09:13:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773AE16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:13:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from publications.ftw.tuwien.ac.at (nt-ftw.ftw.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.90.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E193043D49 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:13:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petrasch@FTW.at) Received: from nt_ftw.ftw.tuwien.ac.at by publications.ftw.tuwien.ac.at ESMTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:35:15 +0100 Received: from erriapo.ftw.local ([192.168.0.47]) by mail.ftw.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:15:33 +0200 From: "Martin Petraschek" To: "dick@nagual.st" Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:15:33 +0200 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2380) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;2) In-Reply-To: <20050407104759.1475f3f0.dick@nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2005 09:15:33.0807 (UTC) FILETIME=[5A49CBF0:01C53B52] cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: dump question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Petraschek List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:13:42 -0000 On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:47:59 +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote: ># dump -h0 -0f - /usr | gzip > /filelocation/filename.dump.gz > >Will this produce a good dumpfile of "/usr" ? I mean, witghout gzip it >would have probably be something like "dump -h0 -0f >/filelocation/filename.dump /tmp" am I right? > >Because I am a little short on space I want to use gzip though. >Thanks. This should be OK. You can even interactively (!) restore from that file using a command like: gunzip /filelocation/filename.dump.gz -c |restore -if - For a full restore of all files in the dumpfile use: cd restoredir gunzip /filelocation/filename.dump.gz -c |restore -rf - Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 09:16:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7F716A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:16:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320C943D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:16:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from attackers@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 1so334064rny for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 02:16:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TQzZf/uqZDVGosnm6/cxT7JHBQizbbZvuK/pi6ij2Ix/9Hl6eM6/D+ZNb2JRKSUL1IHLQ3O5w8b1CG8Rlif50UBx6hdhDULL/lU1IZ4vbYNWAZrGsamChpa2eiJ4iEWyb5g6iOEtXa2wZlKViGKKQDfPj4bek1xgRD/rcDjdIbE= Received: by 10.38.1.62 with SMTP id 62mr280242rna; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 02:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.44 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 02:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4f34b68f0504070216130d89a8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:16:37 +0700 From: John Meing To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Meing List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:16:38 -0000 Hi All, I'm trying to create customized freebsd 4.11 installation CD, it is almost done but I found some problem with customized install.cfg for sysinstall. Here is my install.cfg # install.cfg for sranOS v.0.1-1 # Turn on extra debugging. debug=yes noConfirm=YES noWarn=NO tcpMenuSelect # select media to install mediaSetCDROM dists= bin doc manpages catpages proflibs dict info ports ssecure sbase scontrib sgnu setc sinclude slib slibexec srelease sbin ssbin sshare ssys subin susbin distSetCustom # partition disk=ad0 partition=all bootManager=standard diskPartitionEditor # disklabel ad0s1-1=swap 1048576 none ad0s1-2=ufs 0 / # Let's do it! diskLabelEditor # everything set, do it installCommit command="echo rc_conf_files="/etc/rc.conf /etc/rc.conf.local" >> /etc/rc.conf" system command="echo sshd_enable="YES" >> /etc/rc.conf" system command="echo sendmail_enable="NONE" >> /etc/rc.conf" system command="passwd root" system shutdown Most of processes for sysinstall works fine except process for the lines begin with "command" does not work, I don't know why, Could someone help me ? Best Regards, John Meing From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 09:30:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C47C16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:30:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay10-f54.bay10.hotmail.com [64.4.37.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD0743D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:30:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmx3040@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 02:30:07 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 80.231.218.13 by by10fd.bay10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:30:07 GMT X-Originating-IP: [80.231.218.13] X-Originating-Email: [dmx3040@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dmx3040@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: From: "samuel kirk" To: jerrymc@msu.edu, zhane1@gmail.com Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 05:30:07 -0400 X-Priority: 1 Importance: High Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2005 09:30:07.0737 (UTC) FILETIME=[6330EE90:01C53B54] cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Hi please help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:30:08 -0000 Hi dear jerry one question is what do u mean intel clone and second mine is a sempron 2200 on a msi board i just would liek if u can tell me if it is supported sinc eimn having trouble finding it and third i was wondering if u can tell me and i dont knwo much about the i386 stuff going on but i think im sure ad sempron 2200 will be using i386 please reply soon thank-you >From: "Jerold McAllister" >To: zhane H >CC: questions@FreeBSD.org, dmx3040@hotmail.com >Subject: Re: Hi please help >Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:34:56 -0400 > >zhane H writes: > >>Hi dear staff at freebsd > >NOTE: FreeBSD does not have a "staff". Everyone is a volunteer. >But people understand what you mean by your greeting. > >>How may i check whether the hardware in my pc is supporte by freebsd >>5.3 > >If you look on the FreeBSD web site at: http://www.freebsd.org/ >you will see two releases listed over on the right hand side of the page. >Under each there is a link called 'Hardware Notes' which will take you >to a page that lists types of CPU. Click on one of those and you >will get a list of hardware categories. Click on those to get specific >lists of hardware devices. If you can find your hardware in those lists, >you should have no problem. The difficult thing comes up when you have >an item such as a sound card which uses the same chip as listed in one >of the devices but it doesn't list your specific device model. Most of the >time, it will also work, but no-one has tested it so they don't know for >sure. > >> and also i would liek to ask whcih one of freebsd do i install as i >>dont understand if i ahve to do i386 or some other one im instaling it >>on a msi board amd sempron 2200 with samsung cd-rw and a 10 gig >>seagate hdd > >If your CPU is an Intel type (including AMD 'clone') then choose i386 >type. Only if you know your CPU is one of the others such as Alpha >or sparc64 should you install for those. All regular PCs are the i386 >type. > >NOTE, by the way, that FreeBSD 5.4 is scheduled to come out at the end >of this month. It will have many improvements over 5.3. You may not >want to wait to start hands on learning, but you may want to just install >and experiment for now and then completely reinstall when 5.4 is released. > >Good luck, > >////jerry > >> >>Please contact me back as soon possible as im in very urgent need of help! >> >> >>Sincerely Zhan >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 09:52:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C738016A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:52:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from proxy.ddcom.co.jp (proxy.ddcom.co.jp [211.121.191.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D224F43D48 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:52:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rees@ddcom.co.jp) Received: (qmail 8486 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2005 10:05:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO matthew) (10.10.10.11) by mail.ddcom.local with SMTP; 7 Apr 2005 10:05:18 -0000 Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:52:50 +0900 From: Joel To: "samuel kirk" , questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <20050407184020.D34A.REES@ddcom.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.06 Subject: Re: Hi please help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:52:50 -0000 On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 05:30:07 -0400 "samuel kirk" wrote > Hi dear jerry > one question is what do u mean intel clone and second mine is a sempron > 2200 on a msi board i just would liek if u can tell me if it is supported > sinc eimn having trouble finding it and third i was wondering if u can tell > me and i dont knwo much about the i386 stuff going on but i think im sure ad > sempron 2200 will be using i386 please reply soon thank-you Try searching: http://www.google.co.jp/search?q=msi+sempron+freebsd For example, http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/stable/2005-03/0003.html but MSI which? My sempron 2200 runs fine. -- Joel Rees digitcom, inc. $B3t<02q ** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 10:01:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419EE16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:01:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6C243D55 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:01:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from pooh.nagual.st (pooh.nagual.st [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.st with esmtp; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:01:48 +0200 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:01:48 +0200 From: dick hoogendijk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050407120148.1904bcae.dick@nagual.st> Organization: nagual SiTe X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: rtc question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dick@nagual.st List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:01:50 -0000 I decided to remove polling and hz=1200 from my kernel. The system was slower. Things run pretty smooth now (duron-800/512Mb) with the default HZ=100, /but/ : Now vmware3 is complaining about the rtc : timing error, please increase... The virtual machine itself runs just fine. If it does no harm I want to stick to the HZ=100. What does this rtc message mean and what are the consequenses? An unstable system? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 10:55:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C2016A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:55:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ptb-relay01.plus.net (ptb-relay01.plus.net [212.159.14.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E6F43D39 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:55:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian@codepad.net) Received: from [80.229.159.44] (helo=hercules.codepad.net) by ptb-relay01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1DJUg1-000DOX-6J for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:55:57 +0000 From: Xian To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:55:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200504071416.57580.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> In-Reply-To: <200504071416.57580.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504071155.56330.ian@codepad.net> Subject: Re: Sound Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:55:59 -0000 On Thursday 07 April 2005 05:16, Warren wrote: > I upgraded my ports/src/kernel yesterday and after i rebooted i no longer > have any sound installed. > > Being as i have onboard sound and honestly have no idea the chipset the > sound uses etc .. i was wondering if someone could give me a guide to how > to get my sound back and working? I have a ASUS A7V600-X motherboard, and sound came out the mic (pink) socket until I used this patch: http://www.essenz.com/support/lists/hackers/20041231/51.html -- /Xian "What is Pi? Mathematician: Pi is the number expressing the relationship between the circumference of a circle and its diameter. Physicist: Pi is 3.14159267 plus or minus 0.000000005. Engineer: Pi is about 3." unknown author From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 11:02:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2603116A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:02:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ptb-relay01.plus.net (ptb-relay01.plus.net [212.159.14.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C528E43D58 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:02:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian@codepad.net) Received: from [80.229.159.44] (helo=hercules.codepad.net) by ptb-relay01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1DJUm0-000Nyj-M2 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:02:08 +0000 From: Xian To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:02:06 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <50905.10.100.56.25.1112857360.squirrel@10.100.56.25> In-Reply-To: <50905.10.100.56.25.1112857360.squirrel@10.100.56.25> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504071202.06947.ian@codepad.net> Subject: Re: Help: Streaming media capture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:02:12 -0000 On Thursday 07 April 2005 08:02, Mangesh Bhalerao wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I got a question, if i would like to download a file > on my hdd , such as > > rtsp://folder.something.com/blablabla.rm > > how to get it download and let me know you i am working > behind a webonly firewall which blocks all udp connections > as well as i need to have a poxy connecton to access internet. > > I have tried mplayer ( mplayerhq.hu ) but was not successful because of i > guess, the proxy config in mplayer. > > If you know any other utility and how to use it, please let me know. > > TIA. > > Regards > > ---------------------------------------------------- > Mangesh Bhalerao > M.Tech. (II nd Sem) > DA-IICT ,(www.da-iict.org) > Gandhinagar - 382009 > > Ph#. 9426366185 > ------------------------------------------------------ ssh port forwarding might get you round the firewall. For actually getting the stream onto disk, mplayer is very good. -- /Xian "C lets you shoot yourself in the foot rather easily. C++ allows you to blow your whole leg off" unknown author From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 11:03:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9228616A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:03:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.libero.it (smtp2.libero.it [193.70.192.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D181843D54 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:03:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.alberti@inwind.it) Received: from localhost (172.16.1.82) by smtp2.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 41BDB663018F1593 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:03:57 +0200 Received: from libero.it (172.16.1.85) by smtp0.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 41BDA6DE00FEED58 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:03:38 +0200 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:03:38 +0200 Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sensitivity: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "m.alberti@inwind.it" To: "freebsd-questions" X-XaM3-API-Version: 4.1 (B27pl2) X-type: 0 X-SenderIP: 192.167.215.104 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at libero.it serv3 Subject: Problem with partitioning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:03:40 -0000 Dear all, I have been trying to install FreeBSD 5.3, and having problems= with partitions. My HD configuration was as follows: - one IBM 30 GB H= D (seen as ad0 by FreeBSD booted from CD, and as /dev/hde by Linux) with= a FAT32 partition (WinME), a Ext3 partition (Mandrake Linux 8.1) and a = Linux Swap partition - one Maxtor 200 GB HD (seen as ad1 by FreeBSD and = as /dev/hdg by Linux) with a FAT32 partition (no OS on it), a Ext3 parti= tion (Slackware Linux 10.1) and 100 GB free space. The OSes are booted = by Lilo installed on the MBR of the first disk. I made a 30GB partition = for FreeBSD and installed the system on it, leaving the MBRs untouched. = It did give me a warning about wrong disk geometry, but otherwise the in= stallation seemed OK. Now what happens is: - WinME can't see the FAT32 = partition on the Maxtor disk (let alone the other ones); - Mandrake Linu= x and Lilo can't see any partition on the Maxtor disk (so I can't boot t= he OSes on this disks); - Knoppix 3.7 (a live Linux CD) can see the part= itions on the Maxtor disk (even the sub-partitions in the FreeBSD partit= ions - let me apologize here for not using the proper FreeBSD terminolog= y) but it can't mount them properly; - FreeBSD (booted from CD) can see = and mount everything properly. A couple more notes: - I made the partit= ions on the Maxtor CD with Slackware's fdisk; - When I boot from the Fre= eBSD cd (or Freesbie) I need to choose safe mode, or it will hang after = detecting the Maxtor disk (maybe I should have taken this in more accoun= t...). Any idea on what went wrong and how to fix it? The data already o= n the Maxtor disk are not critical, but I would prefer to recover them.=0D = Thanks, Marco=0A=0A=0A=0A_______________________________________________= _____________=0ANavighi a 4 MEGA e i primi 3 mesi sono GRATIS. =0AScegli = Libero Adsl Flat senza limiti su http://www.libero.it=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 11:13:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AEE16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:13:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404E743D54 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:13:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-77.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.77]) by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE39E123A52; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:12:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D85812B086; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:13:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62231-01; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:13:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from alpha (alpha.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDD412B002; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:13:13 +0200 (CEST) From: =?us-ascii?B?Qmpvcm4gS29uaWc=?= To: "'Andrew & Alissa Wyderka'" , Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:13:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20050407051323.88481.qmail@web81107.mail.yahoo.com> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcU7MKJ1qQjEn0hFTrOzcggDUNIrywAMVFWA Message-Id: <20050407111313.DFDD412B002@eurystheus.local> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Subject: RE: Windows XP & Partition Magic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:13:30 -0000 Andrew & Alissa Wyderka: > Can FreeBSD be installed if I use Partition Magic. I am > currently running on Windows XP environment. (That is the > only primary partition) ..If so how..I keep getting error > messages "Could not find Primary Descriptor"..when installing > FreeBSD from CD. Am I partitioning wrong, or is XP not compatable? In general FreeBSD works with Windows XP side by side. Do you get this error message while booting from CD, during preparation of partitions or installation or at the first boot of an installed system? What's the role of Partition Magic? If you made room for FreeBSD with Partition Magic then you don't need it anymore and it might be totally unrelated to your problem. Bjorn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 11:17:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE5D16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:17:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from engraver.valleygate.net (12-240-1-161.client.mchsi.com [12.240.1.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A37943D2D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:17:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wizlayer@gmail.com) Received: from wizard.valleygate.net (wizard.valleygate.net [10.51.10.3]) j37BHTlc009811; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 07:17:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wizlayer@gmail.com) From: wizlayer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 07:17:26 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <4f34b68f0504070216130d89a8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4f34b68f0504070216130d89a8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504070717.28044.wizlayer@gmail.com> cc: attackers@gmail.com Subject: Re: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: wizlayer@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:17:31 -0000 On Thursday 07 April 2005 05:16 am, John Meing wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to create customized freebsd 4.11 installation CD, > it is almost done but I found some problem with customized > install.cfg for sysinstall. > > Here is my install.cfg > [snip] > > command="echo rc_conf_files="/etc/rc.conf /etc/rc.conf.local" > >> /etc/rc.conf" system > command="echo sshd_enable="YES" >> /etc/rc.conf" system > command="echo sendmail_enable="NONE" >> /etc/rc.conf" system > command="passwd root" system > shutdown > > Most of processes for sysinstall works fine except process for > the lines begin with "command" does not work, I don't know why, > Could someone help me ? > > > Best Regards, > John Meing I can imagine it would. If there was a command= (could be, but I'm relatively new to doing the automated install stuff), it's not mentioned in the example install.cfgs I've seen. Besides, even if it is an option, think about how it would carry out... it makes about as much sense as telling your shell to: echo "hello="hola"" ... syntax is kinda sucky. HTH, Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 11:18:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E3B16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:18:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51110.mail.yahoo.com (web51110.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B75FE43D41 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:18:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fasi_74@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 70183 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Apr 2005 11:18:45 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=s7hKo2M61sY17AwT3xR22ozKfFNtit8x8SSIP8d1PU5CFrX74ikjCoYFhRVZvC22e2K95BUISCNf9Z9WqBU2nAyl0mXxnCF+GfYx/irYvUsS3ah/StziG4bIafLS6GTV71C7ez9avmtdNtuAxBm+VyX3q3Wc+3+qiGlI4XuasX0= ; Message-ID: <20050407111845.70181.qmail@web51110.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.147.160.231] by web51110.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 04:18:44 PDT Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:18:44 -0700 (PDT) From: faisal gillani To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: DNS Names resolution in ipfw+nat ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:18:46 -0000 Well i read couple of how,to artical on the internet regarding setting up a ipfw firewall with nat to allow your private network client to setup internet access , but their isnt one thing clear to me , which was not present in any of the articals , which is how there internal clients gona resolve internet hosts names ? will this be autoconfigured ? thanks *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ Allah-hu-Akber*º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ God is the Greatest __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 11:22:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EAD16A4CF for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:22:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943C543D41 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:22:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mick.Walker@bodycareint.com) Received: from mailgate.bodycareint.com ([62.49.166.202] helo=blue.bodycareint.com) by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1DJV2o-0009Zt-HT; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:19:30 +0000 X-Exclaimer-OnMessagePostCategorize-{a0fa73bf-6a26-4e37-ab63-c1cdd3e3f425}: C:\Program Files\eXclaimer\eXclaimer.dll - 2.0.4.67 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Importance: normal Priority: normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:21:47 +0100 Message-ID: <14C964392E81224099A3DE0666C6A6C5AFFE3A@blue.bodycareint.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: RE: thread-index: AcU7Y2G4X7iFpDkvQh+UTZhs/ST/1AAAIImQ From: "Mick Walker" To: , cc: attackers@gmail.com Subject: RE: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:22:14 -0000 LS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IHdpemxheWVyIFttYWlsdG86d2l6bGF5 ZXJAZ21haWwuY29tXSANClNlbnQ6IDA3IEFwcmlsIDIwMDUgMTI6MTcNClRvOiBmcmVlYnNkLXF1 ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZw0KQ2M6IGF0dGFja2Vyc0BnbWFpbC5jb20NClN1YmplY3Q6IFJl Og0KDQoNCk9uIFRodXJzZGF5IDA3IEFwcmlsIDIwMDUgMDU6MTYgYW0sIEpvaG4gTWVpbmcgd3Jv dGU6DQo+IEhpIEFsbCwNCj4NCj4gSSdtIHRyeWluZyB0byBjcmVhdGUgY3VzdG9taXplZCBmcmVl YnNkIDQuMTEgaW5zdGFsbGF0aW9uIENELCBpdCBpcyANCj4gYWxtb3N0IGRvbmUgYnV0IEkgZm91 bmQgc29tZSBwcm9ibGVtIHdpdGggY3VzdG9taXplZCBpbnN0YWxsLmNmZyBmb3IgDQo+IHN5c2lu c3RhbGwuDQo+DQo+IEhlcmUgaXMgbXkgaW5zdGFsbC5jZmcNCj4NCltzbmlwXQ0KPg0KPiBjb21t YW5kPSJlY2hvIHJjX2NvbmZfZmlsZXM9Ii9ldGMvcmMuY29uZiAvZXRjL3JjLmNvbmYubG9jYWwi DQo+ID4+IC9ldGMvcmMuY29uZiIgc3lzdGVtDQo+IGNvbW1hbmQ9ImVjaG8gc3NoZF9lbmFibGU9 IllFUyIgPj4gL2V0Yy9yYy5jb25mIiBzeXN0ZW0gY29tbWFuZD0iZWNobyANCj4gc2VuZG1haWxf ZW5hYmxlPSJOT05FIiA+PiAvZXRjL3JjLmNvbmYiIHN5c3RlbSBjb21tYW5kPSJwYXNzd2Qgcm9v dCIgDQo+IHN5c3RlbSBzaHV0ZG93bg0KPg0KPiBNb3N0IG9mIHByb2Nlc3NlcyBmb3Igc3lzaW5z dGFsbCB3b3JrcyBmaW5lIGV4Y2VwdCBwcm9jZXNzIGZvciB0aGUgDQo+IGxpbmVzIGJlZ2luIHdp dGggImNvbW1hbmQiIGRvZXMgbm90IHdvcmssIEkgZG9uJ3Qga25vdyB3aHksIENvdWxkIA0KPiBz b21lb25lIGhlbHAgbWUgPw0KPg0KPg0KPiBCZXN0IFJlZ2FyZHMsDQo+IEpvaG4gTWVpbmcNCg0K SSBjYW4gaW1hZ2luZSBpdCB3b3VsZC4gIElmIHRoZXJlIHdhcyBhIGNvbW1hbmQ9IChjb3VsZCBi ZSwgYnV0IA0KSSdtIHJlbGF0aXZlbHkgbmV3IHRvIGRvaW5nIHRoZSBhdXRvbWF0ZWQgaW5zdGFs bCBzdHVmZiksIGl0J3MgDQpub3QgbWVudGlvbmVkIGluIHRoZSBleGFtcGxlIGluc3RhbGwuY2Zn cyBJJ3ZlIHNlZW4uICBCZXNpZGVzLCANCmV2ZW4gaWYgaXQgaXMgYW4gb3B0aW9uLCB0aGluayBh Ym91dCBob3cgaXQgd291bGQgY2Fycnkgb3V0Li4uICANCml0IG1ha2VzIGFib3V0IGFzIG11Y2gg c2Vuc2UgYXMgdGVsbGluZyB5b3VyIHNoZWxsIHRvOg0KDQplY2hvICJoZWxsbz0iaG9sYSIiDQoN Ci4uLiBzeW50YXggaXMga2luZGEgc3Vja3kuDQoNCkhUSCwNCg0KTWlrZQ0KDQoNClBhcmRvbiBt eSBpZ25vcmFuY2UsIGJ1dCBpcyB0aGVyZSBhIHNlY3Rpb24gaW4gdGhlIGhhbmRib29rL21hbiBw YWdlcw0KcmVsYXRpbmcgdG8gY3JlYXRpbmcgY3VzdG9tIGluc3RhbGwgaW1hZ2VzPw0KSSB3b3Vs ZCBmaW5kIHRoaXMgcmVhbGx5IHVzZWZ1bCBUQkguIEhvd2V2ZXIgZnJvbSB3b3JrIEkgZG8gbm90 IGhhdmUNCmFjY2VzcyB0byB0aGUgaW50ZXJuZXQsIG9yIHRoZSBoYW5kYm9vayBpbnN0YWxsZWQg bG9jYWxseSB0byBjaGVjay4NCg0KVGhhbmtzDQpNaWNrIFdhbGtlciANCklNUE9SVEFOVCBOT1RJ Q0U6IA0KVGhpcyBlbWFpbCBpcyBjb25maWRlbnRpYWwuIEl0IG11c3Qgbm90IGJlIHJlYWQsIGNv cGllZCBkaXNjbG9zZWQgb3IgdXNlZCBieSBhbnkgcGVyc29uIG90aGVyIHRoYW4gdGhlIG5hbWVk IHJlY2lwaWVudC4gVW5hdXRob3Jpc2VkIHVzZSwgZGlzY2xvc3VyZSBvciBjb3B5aW5nIGlzIHN0 cmljdGx5IHByb2hpYml0ZWQgYW5kIG1heSBiZSB1bmxhd2Z1bC4gVGhlIHZpZXdzIGV4cHJlc3Nl ZCBpbiB0aGlzIG1haWwgYXJlIHRoZSB2aWV3cyBvZiB0aGUgYXV0aG9yIGFuZCBtYXkgbm90IGJl IHRoZSB2aWV3cyBvZiB0aGUgY29tcGFueS4gSWYgeW91IGhhdmUgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBlbWFp bCBpbiBlcnJvciwgcGxlYXNlIGNvbnRhY3QgdGhlIHNlbmRlciBpbW1lZGlhdGx5LiBUaGVyZSBt YXkgYmUgYXR0YWNobWVudHMgdG8gdGhpcyBlbWFpbCB3aGljaCBtYXkgY29udGFpbiB2aXJ1c2Vz IHdoaWNoIGNvdWxkIGRhbWFnZSB5b3VyIG93biBjb21wdXRlciBzeXN0ZW0uIEJvZHlDYXJlIElu dGVybmF0aW9uYWwgaGFzIHRha2VuIGV2ZXJ5IHJlYXNvbmFibGUgcHJlY2F1dGlvbiB0byBtaW5p bWlzZSB0aGUgcmlzaywgYnV0IGNhbm5vdCBhY2NlcHQgbGlhYmlsaXR5IGZvciBhbnkgZGFtYWdl IHdoaWNoIHlvdSBtYXkgc3VzdGFpbiBhcyBhIHJlc3VsdCBvZiBzb2Z0d2FyZSB2aXJ1c2VzLiBZ b3Ugc2hvdWxkIGNhcnJ5IG91dCB5b3VyIG93biB2aXJ1cyBjaGVja3MgYmVmb3JlIG9wZW5pbmcg YXR0YWNobWVudHMuIA0KICANCkJvZHlDYXJlIEludGVybmF0aW9uYWwgDQpCb2R5Q2FyZSBIb3Vz ZSwgQmxhY2tldHQgUm9hZCwgRGFybGluZ3RvbiwgQ28uIER1cmhhbSwgREwxIDJCSiANClRlbDog MDEzMjUgMzYwOTAwIA0KRmF4OiAwMTMyNSAzNjM5MjIgDQogIA0K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 11:37:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B4A16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:37:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD0143D31 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:37:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.37.55] ([82.41.37.55]) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:38:34 +0100 Message-ID: <42551B94.1000102@dial.pipex.com> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:37:56 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040627 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew & Alissa Wyderka References: <20050407051323.88481.qmail@web81107.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050407051323.88481.qmail@web81107.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2005 11:38:34.0897 (UTC) FILETIME=[55043810:01C53B66] cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Windows XP & Partition Magic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:37:59 -0000 Andrew & Alissa Wyderka wrote: >Can FreeBSD be installed if I use Partition Magic. I am currently running on Windows XP environment. (That is the only primary partition) ..If so how..I keep getting error messages "Could not find Primary Descriptor"..when installing FreeBSD from CD. Am I partitioning wrong, or is XP not compatable? > > I used PM to split my XP disk in two before installing FreeBSD. What did you do with PM? From memory, the new partition you create should be of type "unused" since PM doesn't know about FreeBSD partition types. Without more information it will be hard to help you. But what you are trying to do can be done. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 11:38:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4CE16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:38:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2FC43D53 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:38:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from attackers@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 1so348244rny for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 04:38:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Zl8Sfd4uai/zqCWqpopo+MnYqYS+YDFRy2Op9H9xBENKwB7zKifwSTWeyZna+OFcPQJZBpyLHKB43knS8wN8VWbQ0tHjSQvbfO8dt7rr0YSQ9z7CvKCnqUui3hm7RjRkb1K4KJWIY2sl3oLTJwI3dYKHsx7jR7V84ZMnUBODv60= Received: by 10.38.1.62 with SMTP id 62mr382035rna; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 04:38:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.44 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:38:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4f34b68f05040704381700d67e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:38:29 +0700 From: John Meing To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mick.Walker@bodycareint.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: RE: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Meing List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:38:30 -0000 Dear Mike Here are few guides i used to create this install.cfg. http://mypage.bluewin.ch/dazdaz/freebsd_sysinstall.html http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sysinstall&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+4.11-RELEASE&format=html I also try command line version of sysinstall like # /stand/sysinstall command="passwd root" system and it was works, but I don't know why it doesn't work with install.cfg John Meing From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 12:05:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4B816A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:05:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from engraver.valleygate.net (12-240-1-161.client.mchsi.com [12.240.1.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0906943D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:05:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wizlayer@gmail.com) Received: from wizard.valleygate.net (wizard.valleygate.net [10.51.10.3]) j37C5JGY009987; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:05:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wizlayer@gmail.com) From: wizlayer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, John Meing Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:05:16 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <4f34b68f05040704381700d67e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4f34b68f05040704381700d67e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504070805.18085.wizlayer@gmail.com> cc: Mick.Walker@bodycareint.com Subject: Re: install.cfg (was RE: & No Subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: wizlayer@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:05:26 -0000 On Thursday 07 April 2005 07:38 am, John Meing wrote: > Dear Mike > > Here are few guides i used to create this install.cfg. > > http://mypage.bluewin.ch/dazdaz/freebsd_sysinstall.html > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sysinstall&apropos=0&s >ektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+4.11-RELEASE&format=html > > I also try command line version of sysinstall like > # /stand/sysinstall command="passwd root" system > > and it was works, but I don't know why it doesn't work with > install.cfg > > John Meing Open mouth, insert foot... There is a command! :) Okay, but that still doesn't work for the syntax... Going back to your original post: > command="echo sendmail_enable="NONE" >> /etc/rc.conf" system would at best cause mismatching quote errors (which is what I'm assuming you're getting?) Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 12:26:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA6A16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:26:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.UU.SE [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641E443D41 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:26:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 5CBB54898; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:26:09 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s208905; Thu, 7 Apr 05 14:25:47 +0200 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5664822 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:25:47 +0200 (MSZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id 388DC38013; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:25:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2395C002 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:25:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:25:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Davour To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: ps2pdf and ps2epsi behaving strange X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:26:12 -0000 After using these tools, installing the epsmegre port (and some others) and then removing the latter again, the former have stopped working! bash-2.05b$ ps2pdf elcFront.ps Unknown device: pdfwrite bash-2.05b$ ps2epsi elcFront.ps Unknown device: bit bash-2.05b$ How come those devices they ask for have dissapeared, or why have they suddenly developed a need for them? Oddly enough, ps2epsi seems to produce the correct output, regardless of the error - ps2pdf not so. I have reinstalled ghostscript-gnu, but it didn't solve the problem. Are there some port around that messed with them in a way that didn't showed up untill I pkg_delete'd those ports? /Andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 12:31:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E97616A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:31:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from engraver.valleygate.net (12-240-1-161.client.mchsi.com [12.240.1.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E748A43D45 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:31:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wizlayer@gmail.com) Received: from wizard.valleygate.net (wizard.valleygate.net [10.51.10.3]) j37CVVbo010075; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:31:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wizlayer@gmail.com) From: wizlayer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:31:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <4f34b68f05040704381700d67e@mail.gmail.com> <200504070805.18085.wizlayer@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200504070805.18085.wizlayer@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504070831.30547.wizlayer@gmail.com> cc: John Meing Subject: Re: install.cfg (was RE: & No Subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: wizlayer@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:31:33 -0000 On Thursday 07 April 2005 08:05 am, wizlayer wrote: > > Okay, but that still doesn't work for the syntax... Going back > to > > your original post: > > command="echo sendmail_enable="NONE" >> /etc/rc.conf" system > > would at best cause mismatching quote errors (which is what I'm > assuming you're getting?) > > Mike I meant to ps before I sent this... Why not just create the rc.conf you want and introduce it after the install? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 12:36:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2696916A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:36:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC1643D46 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:36:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ylebihan@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so507397wra for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 05:36:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=GTfTls63JddSt8nv6F9U95koyTr3sdwdlzpSi/QUTNT0mRWMU2/Tr/TLzzUBLTyQv34B8daU3POvFG53scYMWEI0wMytURbLbcUDfhU3ksqEOv/pQ9zVzjNWRZx987y/ZlmbOSJG+hjZ1H5WwvpYidEf18EZWdNUeSS8a+RlFKI= Received: by 10.54.76.3 with SMTP id y3mr1112391wra; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 05:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.69.12 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 05:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7c263b6d05040705363e39daa7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:36:03 +0200 From: Yoann Le Bihan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200504070941.42684.haimat@lame.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200504070941.42684.haimat@lame.at> Subject: Re: how to enable PHP on Apache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Yoann Le Bihan List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:36:07 -0000 Hello ! :-) You just need to install mod_php port. It's located into /usr/ports/www (there are a mod_php4/ and a mod_php5/ directories). Just "make install clean" from one or two of these directories and it must be installed. Because I think it's not installed (even if it's mentionned in httpd.conf... it's strange by the way :-). Don't forget to make a "/usr/local/sbin/apachectl restart" after (if it's not already done from the port's installation). Best regards, YLB. yoann.lebihan@softroad.net On Apr 7, 2005 9:41 AM, Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote: > Hi all, > > I did a "make install clean" to compile and install phpmyadmin, which > installed PHP4 as well. Then I added these lines into my httpd.conf: > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > ... > LoadModule php4_module libexec/apache/libphp4.so > ... > AddModule mod_php4.c > ... > > > > DirectoryIndex index.php index.php3 index.html > > > DirectoryIndex index.php3 index.html > > > > > DirectoryIndex index.php index.html > > > DirectoryIndex index.html > > > > ... > > AddType application/x-httpd-php3 .php3 > AddType application/x-httpd-php3-source .php3s > > > AddType application/x-httpd-php .php > AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps > > ... > Alias /phpmyadmin /usr/local/www/phpMyAdmin > ... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > But when I now point my browser to /phpmyadmin, Firefox tells me, > it wants to download a PHTML file. And when I point it to > /phpmyadmin/index.php, I get a .php file, which Firefox wants to > download as well. > > So, how can I setup Apache/PHP to interpret my php files, instead of > sending them 1:1 to the client? Do I miss a configuration here (see > above)? > > Greetings and TIA, Matthias > > -- > And thank you most of all for nuclear power, which is yet to cause a > single proven fatality, at least in this country. > > -- Homer Simpson > Oh Brother, Where Art Thou? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 13:04:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94CDA16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:04:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1EE43D2F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:04:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emccoy@haystacks.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-24-98-109-41.hsd1.ga.comcast.net[24.98.109.41]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20050407130454016001o6a7e>; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:04:54 +0000 Message-ID: <42552FF8.1030708@haystacks.org> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:04:56 -0400 From: Eric McCoy User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: faisal gillani References: <20050407111845.70181.qmail@web51110.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050407111845.70181.qmail@web51110.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: DNS Names resolution in ipfw+nat ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:04:59 -0000 faisal gillani wrote: > Well i read couple of how,to artical on the internet > regarding setting up a ipfw firewall with nat to allow > your private network client to setup internet access , > but their isnt one thing clear to me , which was not > present in any of the articals , which is how there > internal clients gona resolve internet hosts names ? Generally speaking, a program looking to resolve a hostname to an IP will first consult /etc/hosts, which is a simple text file you can examine or edit as you wish. If the hostname which needs to be resolved isn't present in that file, the program will consult DNS via the network. DNS uses port 53 and it can use either TCP or UDP, though in practice a client will never use TCP. (TCP is used mainly for zone transfers and the like, which are server-to-server.) The rule of thumb for Unix is not to use hostnames in startup scripts, because it's possible that DNS will not be available when they are run. It can take over a minute for a DNS query to time out. Besides, it also makes you vulnerable to DNS hijacking. Instead, use IPs or put an entry in /etc/hosts if you must. Incidentally, the firewall rules to allow DNS would be ipfw add allow tcp from me to any 53 setup keep-state ipfw add allow udp from me to any 53 keep-state As a technical aside, the name resolution path I described above is not the way it has to work, just the way it is configured by default. > will this be autoconfigured ? No, though the above rules should be in the sample ipfw script which comes with FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 13:23:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D4816A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:23:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B279F43D1D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:23:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emccoy@haystacks.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-24-98-109-41.hsd1.ga.comcast.net[24.98.109.41]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005040713231901100fnn9se>; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:23:20 +0000 Message-ID: <42553449.3000306@haystacks.org> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:23:21 -0400 From: Eric McCoy User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill References: <1112849066.22153.19.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> <4254B432.7070401@gmx.net> <1112852084.22155.27.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> In-Reply-To: <1112852084.22155.27.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Deamon cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multiprocessors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:23:23 -0000 Bill wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 21:16, FreeBSD Deamon wrote: >>Bill wrote: >>>Is there a comand to use so as to see if freebsd is using both >>>processors? sysctl hw.ncpu, I think. You can also look at /var/run/dmesg.boot and look for: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 1 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 0 BSP stands for bootstrap processor and AP for application processor. The BSP is the one used to load the system until this message comes up: SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! which will happen right before the kernel launches init. >>try top(1) >> >>the output of top should contain a "C" column. if this column contains >>"0"s and "1"s both your CPUs are used > There is a line for cpu put it only shows one. Im used to linux and when > I do a top in Linux I see two lines for my cpus. You are looking in the wrong place. A C *column*, not a CPU *row*. FreeBSD will only ever show the total CPU time on the CPU row. This is something like what you will see on an SMP system: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 89704 emccoy 96 0 2484K 1660K CPU1 0 0:00 0.51% 0.05% top 97005 root 96 0 3092K 1248K select 1 29:28 0.00% 0.00% ntpd First, note the state for top: it's CPU1. Second, the "C" column is 0 for top, 1 for ntpd. The "C" column is the last CPU the process ran on. The WCPU and CPU columns, by the way, are both *per-CPU*, as you can see here: CPU states: 2.7% user, 0.0% nice, 47.5% system, 0.8% interrupt, 49.0% idle 89739 emccoy 110 0 1324K 684K CPU0 0 0:43 99.00% 87.50% cat So another way to tell if SMP is working is if the summary row says 50% idle but you've got a process which shows 100% active. > Is the stock kernel that gets installed when doing a new install smp > enabled? No. > Do i need to rebuild my kernel for smp? Yes. The good news is that it's very easy. The Handbook has information on how to do it. Basically all you need to do is add "options SMP" and make sure "device apic" is enabled (it is by default I believe, even for the GENERIC kernel). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 13:23:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5610216A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:23:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F356243D58 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:23:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 16987 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2005 13:23:33 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Apr 2005 13:23:33 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 37B8D52; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:23:32 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Mark Cullen References: <4252FFF1.507@dsl.pipex.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Apr 2005 09:23:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4252FFF1.507@dsl.pipex.com> Message-ID: <443bu2oh4c.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhclient oddness? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:23:34 -0000 Mark Cullen writes: > Right, I have this weird annoying issue with my modem which I have > finally got around to looking in to. Basically, it's all good and > works fine (obviously, otherwise I wouldn't be here!), except when I > reboot the internet computer the IP will change, the connection > DOESN'T drop, but the IP does change. I have just now narrowed this > down to some sort of problem with dhcp I think. > > The modem has a dhcpd server built in, which sends out the internet IP > address to the computers network card. It seems, whenever the dhcp > client, dhclient in this case, gets restarted it'll get the old ip > address (the first chunk of the quote below, before the ), > natd will update itself, but then the connection will just stall until > dhclient does the next DHCPREQUEST thing (47 seconds in this case?) > .. then the modem sends back a DHCPNAK and I get a different IP > address. Any ideas why this might be happening? Your "modem" is clearly the source of the problem, and it seems unlikely that anything on the FreeBSD side could help, aside from maybe forcing a lease free before starting dhclient on startup. I'd try looking at the configuration for that "modem" device, or possibly for a firmware upgrade for it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 13:30:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBBA16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:30:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E1343D2F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:30:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennisolvany@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so425328rnf for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:30:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=sS8Pbv5celP+Dqe6CMFP2DcjIEVc4SQxLj/Tkzef2YPozj4eqd2RIJQzvoiTx1hXtzcUdK//y+AXXuG5YQ1l6vqUFUJSbJXgAkOaWILMsch4ahokOD3JYKNcU09F7Ch56urAKcXSr0Se1Blz6HeNBWR6+/MbU3Q1TsdL63OvUOc= Received: by 10.39.3.48 with SMTP id f48mr744539rni; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:30:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from d ([67.102.60.210]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id m36sm25677rnd.2005.04.07.06.30.19; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:30:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <000601c53b75$f4b2d420$0366a8c0@d> From: "Dennis Olvany" To: Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:30:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: x11 help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:30:21 -0000 I'm attempting to run the Doom 3 Linux binary on FreeBSD 5.3. I really = have no idea how to get x11/Doom 3 started. I've tested my x11 = configuration with [Xorg -config xorg.conf.new] and it seems to work = well. I'm sure Doom 3 expects x11 to already be running in the form of = KDE or Gnome, but I would like to run Doom 3 directly from the command = line. I have no idea how to get x11 started and then launch Doom 3. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 13:30:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C5816A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:30:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D0543D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:30:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 15484 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2005 13:30:30 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Apr 2005 13:30:30 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 22A3A52; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:30:30 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Martin Petraschek References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Apr 2005 09:30:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44wtren28a.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 ICMP multicast response X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:30:31 -0000 "Martin Petraschek" writes: > By default, FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP multicast echo requests. For IPv4 this behaviour > can be changed with > > sysctl net.inet.icmp.bmcastecho=0|1 > > Is there a similar control for IPv6? No. That would violate RFC 2463, section 2.4(e.2). As well as being a bad idea. If you need it for some custom application that won't be connected to the Internet, you can hack the source. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 13:36:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E1816A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:36:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.changesplace.com (changesplace.com [207.227.117.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE81143D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:36:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@mail.changesplace.com) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:32:37 -0500 Message-Id: <200504070832.AA155058332@mail.changesplace.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Joshua Kampmeier" To: X-Mailer: Subject: 5.3 and 5.4RC1 both fail with CD upon installation(5.1 did not) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: josh@mail.changesplace.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:36:08 -0000 Here is the error I get when booting with(any) of the 5.3/5.4 discs: acd0: CDRW at ata1-master UDMA33 acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x00 ascq=0x00 error=0 acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x00 ascq=0x00 error=0 acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x00 ascq=0x00 error=0 acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x00 ascq=0x00 error=0 acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x00 ascq=0x00 error=0 acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x00 ascq=0x00 error=0 acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x00 ascq=0x00 error=0 acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x00 ascq=0x00 error=0 acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x00 ascq=0x00 error=0 then it starts sysinstall except when I try to start the installation it fails at mounting the CD-ROM. I can install in safe mode.. but then any time there is a cd in the drive upon boot-up.. i get errors again. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 13:38:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE7816A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:38:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mirapoint1.tis.cwru.edu (mirapoint1.TIS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.104.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0BC43D62 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:38:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ttt@cwru.edu) Received: from [129.22.151.155] (tagon.ENGINEERING.CWRU.Edu [129.22.151.155]) by mirapoint1.tis.cwru.edu (MOS 3.5.4-GR) with ESMTP id EJX06973 (AUTH ttt); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:38:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <425537E7.70808@cwru.edu> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:38:47 -0400 From: Tom Trelvik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1112849066.22153.19.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> <4254B432.7070401@gmx.net> <1112852084.22155.27.camel@ws2.billbeau.net> <42553449.3000306@haystacks.org> In-Reply-To: <42553449.3000306@haystacks.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: multiprocessors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:38:48 -0000 Eric McCoy wrote: > You are looking in the wrong place. A C *column*, not a CPU *row*. > FreeBSD will only ever show the total CPU time on the CPU row. This is > something like what you will see on an SMP system: > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND > 89704 emccoy 96 0 2484K 1660K CPU1 0 0:00 0.51% 0.05% top > 97005 root 96 0 3092K 1248K select 1 29:28 0.00% 0.00% ntpd Except that that column isn't present by default when it's not running SMP, even if there are two processors. Here's the output from a fresh install (yesterday) on a dual Opteron without SMP enabled yet: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 240 root 96 0 3268K 1776K select 0:07 0.00% 0.00% dhclient 408 root 96 0 9468K 3572K select 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sendmail 425 root 8 0 3620K 1264K nanslp 0:00 0.00% 0.00% cron Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 13:43:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C5416A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:43:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8929043D41 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:43:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 31983 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2005 13:43:18 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Apr 2005 13:43:17 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3B77D52; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:43:17 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44hdil8bn2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <810a540e050406152124462c81@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Apr 2005 09:43:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <810a540e050406152124462c81@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <44sm22n1my.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Maintaining a Minimal Installation for a Small HDD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:43:18 -0000 Pat Maddox writes: > Yep, that's pretty much right. Use one of the systems to build > everything as packages, and then install all those packages onto your > other machines. Or share them (e.g., by NFS), and build them on the individual machines. Or share them (e.g., by NFS), and build them on the master machine, then install on the other machines (just make sure you don't build them with optimizations that will break the other machines -- of course, this caveat also applies to building packages for those other machines). > You'll still need to compile the kernel and source on each individual machine. Or you could build the kernel and source on the master machine and share them (e.g., by NFS) to install on the other machines. Or use FreeBSD Update or something similar (e.g., you could put a simple version together with rsync). Or build your own releases on the master machine and let the other machines update to them via anonymous FTP. There are a huge number of possibilities, limited only by the amount of effort you're willing to put into them. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 13:46:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CCF16A4CE; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:46:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1425143D4C; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:46:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from beastie.frontfree.net (unknown [219.239.99.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519BDEB0A22; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:46:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost.frontfree.net [127.0.0.1]) by beastie.frontfree.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD99130E53; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:46:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from beastie.frontfree.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (beastie.frontfree.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14012-03; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:46:30 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [61.135.152.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by beastie.frontfree.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68D7130C9B; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:46:19 +0800 (CST) From: Xin LI To: Didier Wiroth In-Reply-To: <0IEI00FU6WHG1B00@store.etat.lu> References: <0IEI00FU6WHG1B00@store.etat.lu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-K11ZAku5XToT2vcScYg+" Organization: The FreeBSD Simplified Chinese Project Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:46:11 +0800 Message-Id: <1112881571.662.39.camel@spirit> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at frontfree.net cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: delphij@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:46:48 -0000 --=-K11ZAku5XToT2vcScYg+ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-XlcZCl9NeydXzIA8TCr8" --=-XlcZCl9NeydXzIA8TCr8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Didier, =E5=9C=A8 2005-04-06=E4=B8=89=E7=9A=84 13:39 +0200=EF=BC=8CDidier Wiroth=E5= =86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Is there a patch available for the rc.d mouse script? I don't have a patch that is good enough to warrant a commit at present. You may want to try the patch attached, but I can not promise that it will work for every case. Thanks for your testing! Cheers, --=20 Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ --=-XlcZCl9NeydXzIA8TCr8 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patch-moused Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name=patch-moused; charset=ISO-8859-1 SW5kZXg6IGphaWwNCj09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0NClJDUyBmaWxlOiAvaG9tZS9uY3ZzL3NyYy9ldGMvcmMu ZC9qYWlsLHYNCnJldHJpZXZpbmcgcmV2aXNpb24gMS4yMQ0KZGlmZiAtdSAtcjEuMjEgamFpbA0K LS0tIGphaWwJMTYgSmFuIDIwMDUgMDM6MTI6MDMgLTAwMDAJMS4yMQ0KKysrIGphaWwJMSBGZWIg MjAwNSAwNzoyMTo1NyAtMDAwMA0KQEAgLTU5LDYgKzU5LDE0IEBADQogCWV2YWwgamFpbF9wcm9j ZnM9XCJcJGphaWxfJHtfan1fcHJvY2ZzX2VuYWJsZVwiDQogCVsgLXogIiR7amFpbF9wcm9jZnN9 IiBdICYmIGphaWxfcHJvY2ZzPSJOTyINCiANCisJIyBEZWZhdWx0IHNldHRpbmdzIGZvciBza2Vs IGphaWwNCisJZXZhbCBqYWlsX3NrZWxfZW5hYmxlPVwiXCRqYWlsXyR7X2p9X3NrZWxfZW5hYmxl XCINCisJWyAteiAiJHtqYWlsX3NrZWxfZW5hYmxlfSIgXSAmJiBqYWlsX3NrZWxfZW5hYmxlPSJO TyINCisJZXZhbCBqYWlsX3NrZWxfcm9vdD1cIlwkamFpbF8ke19qfV9za2VsX3Jvb3RcIg0KKwlb IC16ICIke2phaWxfc2tlbF9yb290fSIgXSAmJiBqYWlsX3NrZWxfcm9vdD0iLyINCisJZXZhbCBq YWlsX3NrZWxfcm9tb3VudHM9XCJcJGphaWxfJHtfan1fc2tlbF9yb21vdW50c1wiDQorCVsgLXog IiR7amFpbF9za2VsX3JvbW91bnRzfSIgXSAmJiBqYWlsX3NrZWxfcm9tb3VudHM9ImJpbiBzYmlu IGxpYiBsaWJleGVjIHVzci9iaW4gdXNyL3NiaW4gdXNyL2luY2x1ZGUgdXNyL2xpYiB1c3IvbGli ZGF0YSB1c3IvbGliZXhlYyB1c3Ivc2JpbiB1c3Ivc2hhcmUiDQorDQogCWV2YWwgamFpbF9tb3Vu dD1cIlwkamFpbF8ke19qfV9tb3VudF9lbmFibGVcIg0KIAlbIC16ICIke2phaWxfbW91bnR9IiBd ICYmIGphaWxfbW91bnQ9Ik5PIg0KIAkjICIvZXRjL2ZzdGFiLiR7X2p9IiB3aWxsIGJlIHVzZWQg Zm9yIHssdX1tb3VudCg4KSBpZiBub25lIGlzIHNwZWNpZmllZC4NCkBAIC04MSw2ICs4OSw5IEBA DQogCWRlYnVnICIkX2ogZnN0YWI6ICRqYWlsX2ZzdGFiIg0KIAlkZWJ1ZyAiJF9qIGV4ZWMgc3Rh cnQ6ICRqYWlsX2V4ZWNfc3RhcnQiDQogCWRlYnVnICIkX2ogZXhlYyBzdG9wOiAkamFpbF9leGVj X3N0b3AiDQorCWRlYnVnICIkX2ogc2tlbCBlbmFibGU6ICRqYWlsX3NrZWxfZW5hYmxlIg0KKwlk ZWJ1ZyAiJF9qIHNrZWwgbW91bnQtcmVhZG9ubHk6ICRqYWlsX3NrZWxfcm9tb3VudHMiDQorCWRl YnVnICIkX2ogc2tlbCBtb3VudC1yZWFkb25seSBmcm9tOiAkamFpbF9za2VsX3Jvb3QiDQogfQ0K IA0KICMgc2V0X3N5c2N0bCByY19rbm9iIG1pYiBtc2cNCkBAIC0xMzYsNiArMTQ3LDE0IEBADQog CQlbIC1mICIke2phaWxfZnN0YWJ9IiBdIHx8IHdhcm4gIiR7amFpbF9mc3RhYn0gZG9lcyBub3Qg ZXhpc3QiDQogCQl1bW91bnQgLWEgLUYgIiR7amFpbF9mc3RhYn0iID4vZGV2L251bGwgMj4mMQ0K IAlmaQ0KKwlpZiBjaGVja3llc25vIGphaWxfc2tlbF9lbmFibGU7IHRoZW4NCisJCWZvciBfbW50 cHQgaW4gJGphaWxfc2tlbF9yb21vdW50cw0KKwkJZG8NCisJCQlpZiBbIC1kICIke2phaWxfcm9v dGRpcn0vJHtfbW50cHR9IiBdIDsgdGhlbg0KKwkJCQl1bW91bnQgLWYgJHtqYWlsX3Jvb3RkaXJ9 LyR7X21udHB0fSA+IC9kZXYvbnVsbCAyPiYxDQorCQkJZmkNCisJCWRvbmUNCisJZmkNCiB9DQog DQogamFpbF9zdGFydCgpDQpAQCAtMTU1LDYgKzE3NCwxMyBAQA0KIAlmb3IgX2phaWwgaW4gJHtq YWlsX2xpc3R9DQogCWRvDQogCQlpbml0X3ZhcmlhYmxlcyAkX2phaWwNCisJCWlmIGNoZWNreWVz bm8gamFpbF9za2VsX2VuYWJsZTsgdGhlbg0KKwkJCWluZm8gIk1vdW50aW5nIHNrZWxldG9uIGZv ciBqYWlsICR7X2phaWx9IGZyb20gJHtqYWlsX3NrZWxfcm9vdH0iDQorCQkJZm9yIF9tbnRwdCBp biAkamFpbF9za2VsX3JvbW91bnRzDQorCQkJZG8NCisJCQkJbW91bnRfbnVsbGZzIC1vcmRvbmx5 ICR7amFpbF9za2VsX3Jvb3R9LyR7X21udHB0fSAke2phaWxfcm9vdGRpcn0vJHtfbW50cHR9ID4g L2Rldi9udWxsIDI+JjENCisJCQlkb25lDQorCQlmaQ0KIAkJaWYgY2hlY2t5ZXNubyBqYWlsX21v dW50OyB0aGVuDQogCQkJaW5mbyAiTW91bnRpbmcgZnN0YWIgZm9yIGphaWwgJHtfamFpbH0gKCR7 amFpbF9mc3RhYn0pIg0KIAkJCWlmIFsgISAtZiAiJHtqYWlsX2ZzdGFifSIgXTsgdGhlbg0KSW5k ZXg6IG1vdXNlZA0KPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KUkNTIGZpbGU6IC9ob21lL25jdnMvc3JjL2V0Yy9yYy5k L21vdXNlZCx2DQpyZXRyaWV2aW5nIHJldmlzaW9uIDEuOQ0KZGlmZiAtdSAtcjEuOSBtb3VzZWQN Ci0tLSBtb3VzZWQJMTYgSmFuIDIwMDUgMDM6MTI6MDMgLTAwMDAJMS45DQorKysgbW91c2VkCTcg QXByIDIwMDUgMTM6NDE6NDUgLTAwMDANCkBAIC0xMCwxMCArMTAsMTYgQEANCiANCiAuIC9ldGMv cmMuc3Vicg0KIA0KKyMgc3RkaW4gbXVzdCBiZSByZWRpcmVjdGVkIGJlY2F1c2UgaXQgbWlnaHQg YmUgYSBzZXJpYWwgY29uc29sZQ0KKyMNCit0dHl2PS9kZXYvdHR5djANCisNCiBuYW1lPW1vdXNl ZA0KIHJjdmFyPWBzZXRfcmN2YXJgDQogY29tbWFuZD0iL3Vzci9zYmluLyR7bmFtZX0iDQorcmVx dWlyZWRfZmlsZXM9IiR7dHR5dn0iDQogc3RhcnRfY21kPSJtb3VzZWRfc3RhcnQiDQorc3RvcF9w b3N0Y21kPSJtb3VzZWRfcG9zdGNtZCINCiBfcGlkcHJlZml4PSIvdmFyL3J1bi9tb3VzZWQiDQog cGlkZmlsZT0iJHtfcGlkcHJlZml4fS5waWQiDQogX3BpZGFyZz0NCkBAIC02NiwxMCArNzIsMTMg QEANCiAJCTs7DQogCWVzYWMNCiANCi0JZm9yIHR0eXYgaW4gL2Rldi90dHl2KiA7IGRvDQotCQl2 aWRjb250cm9sIDwgJHt0dHl2fSAke19tb3VzZWNoYXJfYXJnfSAtbSBvbg0KLQlkb25lDQorCXZp ZGNvbnRyb2wgPCAke3R0eXZ9ICR7X21vdXNlY2hhcl9hcmd9IC1tIG9uDQogCWVjaG8gJy4nDQog fQ0KIA0KK21vdXNlZF9wb3N0Y21kKCkNCit7DQorCXZpZGNvbnRyb2wgPCAke3R0eXZ9IC1tIG9m Zg0KK30NCisNCiBydW5fcmNfY29tbWFuZCAkKg0K --=-XlcZCl9NeydXzIA8TCr8-- --=-K11ZAku5XToT2vcScYg+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCVTmj/cVsHxFZiIoRAuTeAJ9ry9/PG04Sbwod5Y8oXO4U8aXElwCfdkSy KTYQjfOa4sy8OB1H7JelGTQ= =E4ig -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-K11ZAku5XToT2vcScYg+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 13:48:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE8116A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:48:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BEC43D55 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:48:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 17520 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2005 13:48:12 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Apr 2005 13:48:11 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 5806C52; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:48:11 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Warren References: <200504062326.05136.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Apr 2005 09:48:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200504062326.05136.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Message-ID: <44oecqn1es.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ad* read errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:48:12 -0000 Warren writes: > since i updated the ports/src/kernel 2 days ago i have had the followings > error splague me .. are these related or am i looking at hdd failure ? > ======================== > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=1519103 > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=5266559 > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=5266559 > ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=15383527 > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=1484415 > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=25769279 > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=5126031 > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=25089095 > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=26332807 > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=26332807 > ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=115046303 > ad1: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=189786975 It could well be disk failure, but check a couple of simpler things first. Number 1, make sure that you have turned on automatic sector remapping on that disk. How you do that can vary by disk manufacturer, but see the FAQ entry on bad block remapping. Number 2 is to get a new disk cable; cable problems are at least as common as disk failures in my experience, and it's *really* annoying to replace a disk and find that the problem wasn't the disk in the first place. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 13:48:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65ECD16A4F6 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:48:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9739E43D4C for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:48:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emccoy@haystacks.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-24-98-109-41.hsd1.ga.comcast.net[24.98.109.41]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005040713482901400fa8kfe>; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:48:30 +0000 Message-ID: <42553A2E.4070005@haystacks.org> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:48:30 -0400 From: Eric McCoy User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ean Kingston References: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> <200504051850.33281.ean@hedron.org> <1112789082.28348.5.camel@mis3c.rtl.lan> <1318.216.220.59.169.1112812328.squirrel@216.220.59.169> In-Reply-To: <1318.216.220.59.169.1112812328.squirrel@216.220.59.169> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suspending login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:48:33 -0000 Ean Kingston wrote: > If you change the password entry then, when you want > to enable the user again, the user has to enter a new password. This way, > the user keeps his/her old password. Note, the question asked for suspend, > not remove. I read suspend as implying that the account may be used again. No, you don't replace the password, you just insert an invalid character - one which can never be the result of crypt(). That invalid character is typically an asterisk. To unlock the account, you remove the asterisk. It's how pw usermod -L and -U work. For the OP, it's important to use all three approaches if your victim is untrustworthy. If you change the password but nothing else he can still get in via SSH; if you change the shell but nothing else he can still get in via FTP (possibly); if you change the home directory but nothing else he can still get in via SSH (and mess with /tmp or /var/tmp). So if you are locking out the user to preserve evidence of some misdeed, be sure to do all three. If this is just a real-life buddy who's welching on some money he owes you, though, doing only one will probably be sufficient. (Well, doing one and saying things to him like "I bought a .45 last week" and "It turns out that if you do enough cocaine most juries won't convict you of murder.") From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 13:49:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DAF16A4CE; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:49:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED8E43D39; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:49:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from beastie.frontfree.net (unknown [219.239.99.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3596AEB0A22; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:49:33 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost.frontfree.net [127.0.0.1]) by beastie.frontfree.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4DDA13150B; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:49:30 +0800 (CST) Received: from beastie.frontfree.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (beastie.frontfree.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13506-13; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:49:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [61.135.152.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by beastie.frontfree.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D953130C9B; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:49:15 +0800 (CST) From: Xin LI To: Michal Mertl In-Reply-To: <1112731649.68302.11.camel@genius2.i.cz> References: <9a3eae2e6edd.425309a6@etat.lu> <1112731649.68302.11.camel@genius2.i.cz> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gNZa37yTZk4aChb517Uc" Organization: The FreeBSD Simplified Chinese Project Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:49:06 +0800 Message-Id: <1112881746.662.43.camel@spirit> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at frontfree.net cc: delphij@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Didier Wiroth cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re : Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:49:38 -0000 --=-gNZa37yTZk4aChb517Uc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Michal, =E5=9C=A8 2005-04-05=E4=BA=8C=E7=9A=84 22:07 +0200=EF=BC=8CMichal Mertl=E5= =86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Didier Wiroth wrote: > > Hello, > > Thank you very much for replying. > >=20 > > > cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol > > > patch >=20 > > I'm using the RELENG_5 sources from today. >=20 > > The syscons.diff.20050215 works but the vidcontrol.diff.20050215 gives > > some errors. >=20 > The diff is against the sources from -CURRENT where it applies and > compiles cleanly. You should be ok using the current vidcontrol sources > on -STABLE. The only difference is just some code purity fixes by Xin Li > - probably in preparation for integrating the changes we speak about. I went into some problem when using the patch on my own laptop, which indicates that USB based mouse can play something nasty with the patchset :-( It does not affect the functionality seriously, but is really annoying. I would appreciate if someone can fix the issue. Cheers, --=20 Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ --=-gNZa37yTZk4aChb517Uc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCVTpS/cVsHxFZiIoRAsJyAJ9tX7DWabRFOYFdZFX3SMDDdIroJwCcDY0U jcaURBbg2hDioqJr1j04NvI= =+85u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gNZa37yTZk4aChb517Uc-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 13:56:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC4B16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:56:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web81010.mail.yahoo.com (web81010.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33CAC43D53 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:56:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jprez1980@swbell.net) Message-ID: <20050407135650.25130.qmail@web81010.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.90.100.209] by web81010.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:56:50 PDT Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:56:50 -0700 (PDT) From: JP To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Sendmail + No Response from Port 25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:56:51 -0000 Hey Gang-- I need some advice, I am running FreeBSD 5.3 and am having problems getting sendmail to be accessable from outside the LAN. If I am on the LAN and perform a "telnet 192.168.1.254 25" sendmail responds. But anywhere outside of the LAN I cannot get sendmail to respond. I can telnet to it just fine remotely as well as Ftp. I am using PPP since I have a PPPoE connection. Any advice? Thanks, JP From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 14:07:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B75F16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:07:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EF843D1D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:07:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de) Received: from [213.6.69.68] (A4544.a.pppool.de [213.6.69.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC583000C34 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:07:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42553EB2.8090804@mail.uni-mainz.de> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:07:46 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Institut =?ISO-8859-15?Q?f=FCr_Geophysik?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; de-AT; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050328 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-mainz.de Subject: Debug tags in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:07:54 -0000 Dear Sirs. Sometimes I watch compiling 'world' or 'kernel' and recognize some '-g' options while compiling, especially when doing so with a FreeBSD 5.X-STABLE branch. Are all pre-releases of FreeBSD due to development and bug tracking 'tagged' with debugger options and do they go away with a 'RELEASE' (or is this simply a stupid rumor that all STABLE versions are still tagged to be debugged)? The reason why I ask is simple. I need my FreeBSD box for scientific researches and would like to squeeze out as much power as possible and therefor debugging options are meant to slow down code. I'm not a development thug, so if this question sound stupid, I would regret bothering you. Hope someone will answer. Thanks, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 14:11:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CD216A4CE; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:11:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757CD43D41; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:11:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de) Received: from [213.6.69.68] (A4544.a.pppool.de [213.6.69.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E923000ADD; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:11:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42553F80.50503@mail.uni-mainz.de> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:11:12 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Institut =?ISO-8859-15?Q?f=FCr_Geophysik?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; de-AT; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050328 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-mainz.de Subject: Using ppp/tun0 manually, how to trigger 'pf' automaticaly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:11:16 -0000 Hello. I use the ppp utility to configure and setup a line (at the moment no other way possible). How can I trigger 'pfctl -F all -f /etc/pf.conf' after the line has been setup to make pf working with the tun0 assigned IP? Or are there other way doing so? Thanks, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 14:12:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364FC16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:12:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av3-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (av3-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A3A43D53 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:12:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: by av3-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 0444637E52; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:12:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.180]) by av3-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E931337E46 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:12:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.201]) by smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 91DB137E48 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:12:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 84128 invoked by uid 1001); 7 Apr 2005 14:12:42 -0000 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:12:42 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: "O. Hartmann" Message-ID: <20050407141242.GA84097@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: "O. Hartmann" , questions@freebsd.org References: <42553EB2.8090804@mail.uni-mainz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42553EB2.8090804@mail.uni-mainz.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Debug tags in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:12:46 -0000 On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 04:07:46PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > Dear Sirs. > Sometimes I watch compiling 'world' or 'kernel' and recognize some '-g' > options while compiling, especially when doing so with a FreeBSD > 5.X-STABLE branch. > Are all pre-releases of FreeBSD due to development and bug tracking > 'tagged' with debugger options and do they go away with a 'RELEASE' (or > is this simply a stupid rumor that all STABLE versions are still tagged > to be debugged)? The default compile options for FreeBSD (including -STABLE, -CURRENT as well as releases) do not include any debug flags. > > The reason why I ask is simple. I need my FreeBSD box for scientific > researches and would like to squeeze out as much power as possible and > therefor debugging options are meant to slow down code. Even if you do compile with '-g' it will not slow down the code at all. The only drawback will be that the extra debug info will take up extra space on the disk. > > I'm not a development thug, so if this question sound stupid, I would > regret bothering you. Hope someone will answer. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 14:18:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1235E16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:18:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from publications.ftw.tuwien.ac.at (nt-ftw.ftw.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.90.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C948743D39 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:18:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petrasch@FTW.at) Received: from nt_ftw.ftw.tuwien.ac.at by publications.ftw.tuwien.ac.at ESMTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:40:05 +0100 Received: from erriapo.ftw.local ([192.168.0.47]) by mail.ftw.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:20:24 +0200 From: "Martin Petraschek" To: "Lowell Gilbert" Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:20:24 +0200 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2380) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;2) In-Reply-To: <44wtren28a.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2005 14:20:24.0797 (UTC) FILETIME=[F09160D0:01C53B7C] cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: IPv6 ICMP multicast response X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Petraschek List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:18:33 -0000 On 07 Apr 2005 09:30:29 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >"Martin Petraschek" writes: > >> By default, FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP multicast echo >>requests. For IPv4 this behaviour can be changed with >> >> sysctl net.inet.icmp.bmcastecho=0|1 >> >> Is there a similar control for IPv6? > >No. That would violate RFC 2463, section 2.4(e.2). >As well as being a bad idea. The section you are referencing in RFC 2463 is concerning ICMP ERROR messages. Echo requests/responses are informational messages, therefore this section does not apply. The same RFC 2463, section 4.2 states: An Echo Reply SHOULD be sent in response to an Echo Request message sent to an IPv6 multicast address. The source address of the reply MUST be a unicast address belonging to the interface on which the multicast Echo Request message was received. Therefore, the OS _should_ respond to a multicast echo request! Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 14:19:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C6516A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:19:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7497543D53 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:19:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Apr 2005 14:19:56 -0000 Received: from pD9E28181.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO localhost.localdomain) [217.226.129.129] by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 07 Apr 2005 16:19:56 +0200 X-Authenticated: #4870692 From: Andreas Rudisch <"cyb."@gmx.net> To: Dennis Olvany In-Reply-To: <000601c53b75$f4b2d420$0366a8c0@d> References: <000601c53b75$f4b2d420$0366a8c0@d> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-CRw9I4VvmIM9RTJHThro" Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:19:50 +0200 Message-Id: <1112883590.520.10.camel@p4-3200.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x11 help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:19:58 -0000 --=-CRw9I4VvmIM9RTJHThro Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 08:30 -0500, Dennis Olvany wrote: > I'm attempting to run the Doom 3 Linux binary on FreeBSD 5.3. I really ha= ve no idea how to get x11/Doom 3 started. I've tested my x11 configuration = with [Xorg -config xorg.conf.new] and it seems to work well. I'm sure Doom = 3 expects x11 to already be running in the form of KDE or Gnome, but I woul= d like to run Doom 3 directly from the command line. I have no idea how to = get x11 started and then launch Doom 3. Make sure you have a nvidia graphiccard. install the nvidia drivers from the ports. fetch the linux installer for Doom3: ftp://ftp.idsoftware.com/idstuff/doom3/linux/doom3-linux-1.1.1286.x86.run Install Doom3 and play. Have fun, Andreas --=20 GnuPG key : 0xD25FCC81 | http://cyb.websimplex.de/pubkey.asc Fingerprint: D182 6F22 7EEC DD4C 0F6E 564C 691B 0372 D25F CC81 --=-CRw9I4VvmIM9RTJHThro Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCVUGGaRsDctJfzIERAq6zAJ4jYrUU1hoXZYsFmz5HT9YHnCYtZwCdG+HV qfhZbzIjliU4uIjhZFUWYtI= =axst -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-CRw9I4VvmIM9RTJHThro-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 14:22:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F392716A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:22:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postman.inteliport.com (postman.inteliport.com [208.27.31.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFC543D60 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:22:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from colane@inteliport.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (ip39.inteliport.net [208.27.31.39]) by postman.inteliport.com (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id j37EM8X28700 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:22:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4255421A.9070803@inteliport.com> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:22:18 -0400 From: Christopher Lane User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Sysinstall + CVSup or just CVSup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:22:24 -0000 Hi, I've installed FreeBSD 5.3 using the minimum install option, and would like to immediately install the ports collection. What I've done in the past is sysinstall via ftp and then CVSup to update. Is that insane? Can I just CVSup and forget about the sysinstall? Is one method quicker than the other? Maybe there's a better method altogether... Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 14:27:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5700316A4CE; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:27:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from insomnia.benzedrine.cx (insomnia.benzedrine.cx [62.65.145.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5280443D3F; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:27:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhartmei@insomnia.benzedrine.cx) Received: from insomnia.benzedrine.cx (dhartmei@localhost [127.0.0.1]) j37ERACs004605 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:27:10 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from dhartmei@localhost) by insomnia.benzedrine.cx (8.13.3/8.12.10/Submit) id j37ERAgx010647; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:27:10 +0200 (MEST) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:27:09 +0200 From: Daniel Hartmeier To: "O. Hartmann" Message-ID: <20050407142709.GA32520@insomnia.benzedrine.cx> References: <42553F80.50503@mail.uni-mainz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42553F80.50503@mail.uni-mainz.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using ppp/tun0 manually, how to trigger 'pf' automaticaly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:27:12 -0000 On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 04:11:12PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > I use the ppp utility to configure and setup a line (at the moment no > other way possible). How can I trigger 'pfctl -F all -f /etc/pf.conf' > after the line has been setup to make pf working with the tun0 assigned IP? > > Or are there other way doing so? You can use 'from (tun0)', where the interface name is put in parentheses, and pf will automatically note when that interface changes its IP address, without the need to reload the ruleset. Daniel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 14:29:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E352416A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:29:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBD143D55 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:29:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 22139 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2005 14:29:09 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Apr 2005 14:29:09 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id B503852; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:29:07 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Martin Petraschek References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Apr 2005 10:29:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44ll7u64p8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 ICMP multicast response X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:29:10 -0000 "Martin Petraschek" writes: > The section you are referencing in RFC 2463 is concerning ICMP > ERROR messages. Echo requests/responses are informational > messages, therefore this section does not apply. Ah. You're right; I was thinking about error handling because that's the code I happened to be working with this morning. I was looking at the error handling code, as well, so when I said it was impossible I may have been wrong also. [The ICMP6_ECHO_REQUEST handling in icmp6_input() doesn't do any special handling for multicast at all, so I don't see why it doesn't Just Work.] Sorry for not paying enough attention to the question. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 14:45:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C012016A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:45:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outcold.yadt.co.uk (outcold.yadt.co.uk [81.187.204.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F50543D5C for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:45:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidt@yadt.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outcold.yadt.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7333A1DD769 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:45:49 +0100 (BST) Received: from outcold.yadt.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (outcold.yadt.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50526-11 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:45:39 +0100 (BST) Received: by outcold.yadt.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2E4F81DD7DC; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:45:39 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:45:39 +0100 From: David Taylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050407144539.GB55594@outcold.yadt.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.2.1 (20041222) at yadt.co.uk Subject: puc, ppc and MosChip SemiConductors Nm9805 Parallel Port Adapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:45:35 -0000 Hi, I've got an amd64 box with 1 built-in parallel port, which works fine. I also bought an add-on parallel port adapter card (a MosChip SemiConductors Nm9805 chip). After discovering puc, I enabled device puc and the card is now detected by puc, but doesn't appear to be picked up by the ppc driver. I'm running -STABLE from about 24 hours ago. In dmesg: puc0: port 0xd000-0xd00f,0xd400-0xd407,0xd800-0xd807, 0xdc00-0xdc07,0xe000-0xe007,0xe400-0xe407 irq 19 at device 8.0 on pci0 puc: name: NetMos NM9805 1284 Printer port puc0: Reserved 0x8 bytes for rid 0x10 type 4 at 0xe400 port rid 16 bst 0, start e400, end e407 puc: Using ppc0 puc: type 2, bar 10, offset 0 In pciconf -lv: puc0@pci0:8:0: class=0x078000 card=0x00101000 chip=0x98059710 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'MosChip Semiconductors (Was: Netmos Technology)' device = 'Nm9805 Parallel Port Adapter' class = simple comms However, despite the 'using ppc0' line, ppc0 is never mentioned again. The on-board parallel port is allocated to ppc1: ppc1: port 0x778-0x77b,0x378-0x37f irq 7 drq 3 on acpi0 ppc1: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc1: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc1 ppbus0: IEEE1284 device found /NIBBLE/ECP Probing for PnP devices on ppbus0: ppbus0: MLC,PCL,PML lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port However, ppc doesnt appear to exist: # sysctl dev.ppc.0 sysctl: unknown oid 'dev.ppc.0' Since the card is detected, and the puc driver claims to be 'using ppc0', I'm not really sure what to try now. Any one have any ideas? P.S. Please CC me on any replies, as I am not subscribed to this list. -- David Taylor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 14:47:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A5416A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:47:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outcold.yadt.co.uk (outcold.yadt.co.uk [81.187.204.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DCA43D55 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:47:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidt@yadt.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outcold.yadt.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4E91DD7DA for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:47:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from outcold.yadt.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (outcold.yadt.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54934-06 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:47:46 +0100 (BST) Received: by outcold.yadt.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DADAF1DD786; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:47:46 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:47:46 +0100 From: David Taylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050407144746.GA60299@outcold.yadt.co.uk> References: <20050407144539.GB55594@outcold.yadt.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050407144539.GB55594@outcold.yadt.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.2.1 (20041222) at yadt.co.uk Subject: Re: puc, ppc and MosChip SemiConductors Nm9805 Parallel Port Adapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:47:40 -0000 On Thu, 07 Apr 2005, David Taylor wrote: Oops, sorry for the double post. I couldn't find the previous one on the archives, and thought it had got lost due to the DNS problems. Apparantly it was just delayed though. -- David Taylor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 15:08:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEA716A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:08:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD4543D46 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:08:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linicks@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so552203wra for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:08:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=FQe1UJkdXhnwg/1JDK2dL8mT/hz5gHE3BtMusqCFKbGbwvmgmCzkCLIIQzJGYbg0DJV/3dkbjX9aNTjUJfjYPchdUW5p9/MFNsPrLSU4iuONcxVDXqgBrV0Th+Ln9+VKa+QLjN+hs71f6/JH/kJUshsnp4c2bbiQW2xQxF5KaZQ= Received: by 10.54.50.73 with SMTP id x73mr721781wrx; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:08:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.98.3 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:08:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:08:11 -0600 From: Nick Pavlica To: Christopher Lane In-Reply-To: <4255421A.9070803@inteliport.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4255421A.9070803@inteliport.com> cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: Sysinstall + CVSup or just CVSup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nick Pavlica List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:08:13 -0000 Chris, I alway install the ports that I want during my initial installation so I'm not sure what the best post installation method is. I would venture to say that cvsup would be you best bet. --Nick On Apr 7, 2005 8:22 AM, Christopher Lane wrote: > Hi, > > I've installed FreeBSD 5.3 using the minimum install option, and would > like to immediately install the ports collection. What I've done in the > past is sysinstall via ftp and then CVSup to update. Is that insane? > Can I just CVSup and forget about the sysinstall? Is one method quicker > than the other? Maybe there's a better method altogether... > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 15:13:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D9F16A4CF for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:13:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postman.inteliport.com (postman.inteliport.com [208.27.31.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8103B43D46 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:13:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from colane@inteliport.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (ip39.inteliport.net [208.27.31.39]) by postman.inteliport.com (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id j37FCqX21080 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:12:52 -0400 Message-ID: <42554DFD.6030200@inteliport.com> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:13:01 -0400 From: Christopher Lane User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Re: Sysinstall + CVSup or just CVSup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:13:06 -0000 Nick Pavlica wrote: > Chris, > I alway install the ports that I want during my initial installation > so I'm not sure what the best post installation method is. I would > venture to say that cvsup would be you best bet. > > --Nick > My goal is to have the latest ports, regardless of which ones I actually want to install. I guess my question is more "can I CVSup without first installing the ports collection, and if I do so, does that save time or take longer?" - Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 15:15:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6745A16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:15:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8465B43D53 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:15:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike.daemon@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so318600nzk for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:15:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=YibsasKhJ6iOlcfgBXUlbOgM0vAZiHZSrLeBIkRVzhJmPxbTeKszveie+q2gTrFOuWYPQr0t37ohcPjeXMYclPvtMod9Ie73Vza/UXVPfjLtlh3H6fA3ZZ62Dsoo5qegOiVI2FKNEfpOsmQzAPUdWjClnjz40ZkTcLylqVtK/mw= Received: by 10.36.96.8 with SMTP id t8mr61938nzb; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.39.7 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3db6da6d0504070815624c7a03@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:15:57 +0200 From: Mike Daemon To: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <3db6da6d05032713476ac966d4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <3db6da6d05032713157dac8a14@mail.gmail.com> <006701c53314$834b7490$4300a8c0@home.lan> <3db6da6d05032713476ac966d4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: more problems with 5.3 and "TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA" [SOLOTION] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mike Daemon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:15:59 -0000 On Mar 27, 2005 11:47 PM, Mike Daemon wrote: > On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:32:43 -0800, Thomas Foster w= rote: > > I had this same issue >=20 > I=B4ll have seen some more posts on the list with about the same problem > therefore, I hope some bright one will take alook at the code.. and > post something smart.. I=B4m very much stuck, hopeing any new snapshot > will work.. >=20 > on an older AMD Nforce board. 5.2.1 seemed to install > > and run.. but moving to 5.3 gave me issues. I tinkered with the DMA > > settings in the BIOS.. to no avail. The Geometry seemed to be off on t= he > > drive I noticed (IBM deskstar) when I newfs'd it.. so I changed out dri= ves.. > > but never got it working.. I eventually just dropped Gentoo on it. > > > > What chipset, drive controller hard drive are you using on this system? >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Data&sektion=3D4&manpath=3DFree= BSD+5.3-RELEASE >=20 > I=B4ll notised that my idecontroller IS supported by the ata-driver, > witch makes it even stranger.. (I think I will check on my cabling > once more, even if it=B4s a newly installed _rounded_ 32 pin cable..) >=20 > My atacontroller: SiS 5513 > My HDD: Seagate 200 GB >=20 >=20 > > > > T > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Mike Daemon" > > To: "FreeBSD Questions" > > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 1:15 PM > > Subject: more problems with 5.3 and "TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA" > > > > I got this annoying problem when upgradeing to 5.3, the miniinst iso > > blurps out "TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA" when it starts writing base to my > > disk. And when I tried to first install 5.2.1 and upgrade (cvsup, make > > buildworld etc.. ) to 5.3 that way everything seems fine until I > > reboot to single-user-mode, as soon as Im starting to write anything > > to the disk it=B4s blurping out those errors.. I have diagnosticed my > > disk, checked my cabling and fixed my PSU (installed a brand new one). > > No difference. I noticed that my ide-controller was supported in 4.11, > > but not? in 5.3, is that realy true? seems very strange... > > > > Sence I duel boot with Wintendo/Lunix and don=B4t see this problem with > > those oses I=B4m very confused of what to do next.. > > > > I=B4ll tried some snapshots to but no luck... > > > > / Mike > > > > ps My dmesg goes in the attachment, in hope for a patch/solution to > > this problem. ds > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= --------- > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > I (with a little help from a good friend ) figured out an solution to the problem, in switching my brand new ata133 ide-cable to an "old school" ata33 ide-cable FreeBSD sets my drives to UDMA3 and boots up alright.. key commands here: atacontrol list and atacontrol mode ( my buddy had come across some message telling about how SiS had created an new "SiS 5513" chipset with the same tag.. unfortunal he didn't remember where that message were. But it would make sense why FreeBSD tryies to use UDMA5 on my UDMA3 only atachipset.. ) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 15:18:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740B816A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:18:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tarc.po.cs.msu.su (tarc.po.cs.msu.su [158.250.16.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D63043D41 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:18:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tarc@tarc.po.cs.msu.su) Received: from tarc.po.cs.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tarc.po.cs.msu.su (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j37FI7Uo031421 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:18:07 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from tarc@tarc.po.cs.msu.su) Received: (from tarc@localhost) by tarc.po.cs.msu.su (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j37FI7nn031420 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:18:07 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from tarc) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:18:07 +0400 From: Tarc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050407151755.GA31401@tarc.po.cs.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Lost depend? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:18:09 -0000 /usr/ports/www/oops> make ===> oops-1.5.24_1 depends on executable: gawk - found ===> oops-1.5.24_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf259 - found ===> oops-1.5.24_1 depends on shared library: gigabase_r.2 - found ===> Configuring for oops-1.5.24_1 /usr/local/bin/autoheader259: not found *** Error code 127 Stop in /usr/ports/www/oops. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/oops. -- Arseny Nasokin (aka Tarc) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 15:39:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6271916A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:39:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC6D43D2F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:39:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linicks@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so562332wra for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:39:54 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Pxp4hBVdt046kIQWniww+mIaPrm0R66pheYVXlEnyig4AvH0Tlikwv02WmWgzDPSycRuQY8UhMHEIAJNu8BY1xkebAy325fQ6YR/cIkIeu5DdWn42IrtwoK11+tz4ZPXfcjnOZpFOb7tjBWrW7MuhU8FLPIqgrV2tac/YYQAsx4= Received: by 10.54.71.15 with SMTP id t15mr229359wra; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:39:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.98.3 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:39:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:39:53 -0600 From: Nick Pavlica To: Graham Bentley In-Reply-To: <4254F64D.6000002@uk2.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <3.0.6.32.20040617093700.007b1a70@mail.uk2.net> <20040617085132.2ae49db5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <40D24539.1080200@meijome.net> <4254F64D.6000002@uk2.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Norberto Meijome cc: Bill Moran Subject: Re: New user questions :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nick Pavlica List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:39:55 -0000 On Apr 7, 2005 2:58 AM, Graham Bentley wrote: > > >> Graham Bentley wrote: > >> I also wondered if there is a project based on FreeBSD that > >>> achieves similar goals to SME Server (ie all in one LAN server > >>> with Web config) or similar to Trustix (ie minimal config with > >>> series of scripts to configure server services. > > >> Not that I know of, but it sure would be a nice project, huh? > > > > definitely a nice one. > > > > hmm...what would be the best way to go about it? > > - add an option to sysinstall "SME" (well, whatever that would be named > > of course) > > - add a port that 'depends' / installs all the other ports needed > > - with questions and answer to start setting up your system...or > > some kind of UI for it (ugh) > > - same as with ports, but prec-compiled packages. > > > > hmm...must download SME to test and see how they went about it. > > Hi Guys, Iw as wondering how I would even go about starting a project > like this using FreeBSD as I know even less than I do about Linux (not > much) but I really rate SME and would love to see a FreeBSD version as > FreeBSD seems even more suited to this type of thing (ie a stable distro > to base a good project on:) > > Did you get round to checking out SME ? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Graham, After taking a quick look at SME I can see it's appeal. I'm not sure if there is an equivalent for FreeBSD, but it would be a nice addition. Webmin does allot of this functionality as well if you haven't taken a look at that. To start a project like SME all you need to do is start hacking, and provide a web based community for it so that others are aware of it and possibly start helping out. Because they are both *nix based operating systems you may be able to start by porting the web manager from SME to FreeBSD 5.4 +. --Nick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 16:00:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F166316A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:00:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5981043D1D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:00:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linicks@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so570121wra for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:00:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=E2kN5IFq0Fzy4Rego3z6++dNpX3rTzue9NkQDiXe1Q4K4znfKzLAvnuujzjbSxVOSivuu+sebTpbOH0iAsUMfJcDHACblwxSnuxF0A1KD13fLdL5VacMqNJastkOEmsRKgDcF3yQOYp4ZwaMXwUPUQXn+pn7b96YEWcz7X/CAzE= Received: by 10.54.79.17 with SMTP id c17mr21668wrb; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:00:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.98.3 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:00:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:00:23 -0600 From: Nick Pavlica To: Christopher Lane , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <42554DC6.5000806@inteliport.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4255421A.9070803@inteliport.com> <42554DC6.5000806@inteliport.com> Subject: Re: Sysinstall + CVSup or just CVSup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nick Pavlica List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:00:25 -0000 On Apr 7, 2005 9:12 AM, Christopher Lane wrote: > Nick Pavlica wrote: > > Chris, > > I alway install the ports that I want during my initial installation > > so I'm not sure what the best post installation method is. I would > > venture to say that cvsup would be you best bet. > > > > --Nick > > > > My goal is to have the latest ports, regardless of which ones I actually > want to install. I guess my question is more "can I CVSup without first > installing the ports collection, and if I do so, does that save time or > take longer?" > > - Chris > Using cvsup is the way to go for getting the latest ports. I believe that you can use cvsup without installing the ports collection from cd. I would suggest configuring the ports-supfile and running cvsup (cvsup -g -L 2 ports-supfile). You should also update your base with cvsup and make buildworld as described in the handbook. --Nick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 16:00:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698D016A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:00:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tao.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E1543D31 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:00:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.thought.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j37G18EH066381 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:01:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j37G17PJ066380 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:01:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:01:07 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20050407160107.GA66262@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 18++ years of service to the Unix community Subject: [OT] is there a ThinkPad clone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:00:27 -0000 People, Apologies up front if anybody thinks this is *too* far OT, but if the 8 months I've been using FreeBSD on my TP 600E (400MHz, 288M, 12G). it has become my favorite computer. __Not__ having that std mouse-pad thing where you scratch or drag or tap your fingers lets me rest the heel of my left hand dead-center and type away. The tiny mouse-stick and the three cut/paste bars work well too. When I upgrade, I'd like another laptop with the same layout. The few other laptops I've looked at all have that mouse-pad. Anybody know if there is anything like a "ThinkPad clone"?? gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 16:14:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B8D16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:14:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from publications.ftw.tuwien.ac.at (nt-ftw.ftw.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.90.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31D143D3F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:14:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petrasch@FTW.at) Received: from nt_ftw.ftw.tuwien.ac.at by publications.ftw.tuwien.ac.at ESMTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:35:35 +0100 Received: from erriapo.ftw.local ([192.168.0.47]) by mail.ftw.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:15:54 +0200 From: "Martin Petraschek" To: "Lowell Gilbert" Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:15:54 +0200 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2380) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;2) In-Reply-To: <44ll7u64p8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2005 16:15:54.0838 (UTC) FILETIME=[1331B760:01C53B8D] cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: IPv6 ICMP multicast response X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Petraschek List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:14:03 -0000 On 07 Apr 2005 10:29:07 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >"Martin Petraschek" writes: > >> The section you are referencing in RFC 2463 is concerning ICMP >> ERROR messages. Echo requests/responses are informational >> messages, therefore this section does not apply. > >Ah. You're right; I was thinking about error handling because that's >the code I happened to be working with this morning. I was looking at >the error handling code, as well, so when I said it was impossible I >may have been wrong also. [The ICMP6_ECHO_REQUEST handling in >icmp6_input() doesn't do any special handling for multicast at all, so >I don't see why it doesn't Just Work.] > >Sorry for not paying enough attention to the question. No problem. Anyway, because of your reply I double checked my setup and found out that FreeBSD does indeed answer to multicast ping requests. There just does not seem to be a sysctl switch to turn off this behaviour (as there is for IPv4). Thank you, Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 16:15:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0900B16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:15:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.aheyn.com (lifestylecomm.com [66.9.27.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C2343D4C for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:15:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aheyn@lifestylecomm.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.aheyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F28A1814F9; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:16:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.aheyn.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lifestylecomm.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09738-06; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:16:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from AREILLPC (ns.jmsent.com [66.9.27.146]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.aheyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97AC1814F6; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:16:38 -0400 (EDT) From: "Andrew Heyn" To: Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:15:21 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20050407160107.GA66262@thought.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lifestylecomm.com Subject: RE: [OT] is there a ThinkPad clone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:15:36 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gary Kline Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 9:01 AM To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: [OT] is there a ThinkPad clone? People, Apologies up front if anybody thinks this is *too* far OT, but if the 8 months I've been using FreeBSD on my TP 600E (400MHz, 288M, 12G). it has become my favorite computer. __Not__ having that std mouse-pad thing where you scratch or drag or tap your fingers lets me rest the heel of my left hand dead-center and type away. The tiny mouse-stick and the three cut/paste bars work well too. When I upgrade, I'd like another laptop with the same layout. The few other laptops I've looked at all have that mouse-pad. Anybody know if there is anything like a "ThinkPad clone"?? gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix ----------- Gary, Your typing habits disturb me greatly. Please consider this document: http://www3.gov.ab.ca/hre/whs/publications/pdf/erg029.pdf Save yourself! Thanks, Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 16:51:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2A616A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:51:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from jail.idea-anvil.net (idea-anvil.net [63.226.12.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1A843D2D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:51:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aksis@idea-anvil.net) Received: from idea-anvil.net (vaio [10.0.0.99]) by jail.idea-anvil.net (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j37Gpgoj045946 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:51:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from aksis@idea-anvil.net) From: aksis@idea-anvil.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:51:37 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504070951.38865.aksis@idea-anvil.net> Subject: ipfw + pipe and icmp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:51:44 -0000 Hi, I want to allow *all* icmp traffic on the firewall, but I don't want *incoming* traffic to be able to over whelm my connection, so I am going to use ipfw pipe. I just wanted to double check and make sure what I am going to do will work the way I think it will: ... snip ... cmd="ipfw add" oif="tun0" skip="skipto 60000" ks="keep-state" # ping -s 56 -c 10 # 56 translates into 64 ICMP data bytes when combined with # the 8 bytes of ICMP header data, thus for the pipe: ipfw pipe 1 config bw 640bits/s <-- will this and queue need a rule number? $cmd add queue 1 icmp from any to any in via $oif $ks <-- rule number? ... snip ... $cmd 100 divert natd ip from any to any in via $pif $cmd 101 check-state ... snip ... $cmd 200 add queue 1 icmp from any to any in via $oif $ks $cmd 201 $skip icmp from any to any out via $pif $ks $cmd 202 $skip add allow log icmp from any to any $ks ... snip ... $cmd 59999 deny all from any to any $cmd 60000 divert natd ip from any to any out via $pif $cmd 60010 allow ip from any to any ... snip ... I belive this will limit all incoming icmp traffic to 640bits/s but not any outgoing, or, replys to outgoing thus making icmp flooding imposable. Please correct me if I am wrong, (did i form the rules correctly?), or if I should go about this another way. Also, how much bandwidth does a single default sized ping packet consume? Should I raise or lower the limit, (I don't want the replies to be false or give to much slack)? This is a part that I'm not clear on at all. I don't belive more then 10 pings should be considered. Also, if I start using rules with pipes, will I need to rewrite all the rules to use pipes or will only the rules with pipes be limited and everything else will operate on default? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 17:08:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E1216A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:08:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A4243D39 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:08:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mohneyj@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so680332wri for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:08:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=k0E14p5fdH1nATNl4VAdZCGxiQYQr2ajrfq+sC27m4uuNZIo407/dGPEewVdQqxsz7AjjBE9zdrQMyldg21zwevCER+HC83pc2x1cOk/cMCryeqJkd7dkgRARHHJ++ztsU6jILYazObknSIT/pLwzxH01BQDqNto8kszhceDuKM= Received: by 10.54.71.9 with SMTP id t9mr446268wra; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.76.15 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:08:47 -0400 From: Jeff Mohney To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Freebsd Foundation and Java Binary Support/Licenses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jeff Mohney List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:08:49 -0000 Hello. I have two questions: 1. When will the freebsdfoundation site be up and running again, it appears that the sub-pages are still not avail and the website says: March 11, 2005 - www.FreeBSDFoundation.org temporarily unavailable due to hardware failure. Due to a hardware failure, the FreeBSD Foundation web site is temporarily unavailable. The full site will be restored within a few days. 2. My understanding is that jdk/jre support in 5.x is only available via linux emulation and or linux emulation to get a build to get to a FBSD binary version - ick. If I understood correctly 4.x has the binary version w/out all the downloading from sun and what not. I heard at one point that the Foundation was renegotiating w/ sun so that 5.x could have the same - Is there any news on this? (I would check the foundation site for it but it is down as previously mentioned). Many thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 17:33:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AA316A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:33:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ptb-relay03.plus.net (ptb-relay03.plus.net [212.159.14.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB4943D39 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:33:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian@codepad.net) Received: from [80.229.159.44] (helo=hercules.codepad.net) by ptb-relay03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1DJasy-000LaJ-SK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:33:44 +0000 From: Xian To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:33:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200504070130.40305.ian@codepad.net> <20050406210809.Y65233@frambozen.monochrome.org> In-Reply-To: <20050406210809.Y65233@frambozen.monochrome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504071833.43870.ian@codepad.net> Subject: Re: sending mail between local computers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:33:46 -0000 On Thursday 07 April 2005 02:19, Chris Hill wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Xian wrote: > > I have two FreeBSD boxes running sendmail, how would make it so mail > > can be sent from one box to the other? > > Assuming they are both on your local network, as suggested in the > subject... You shouldn't have to do anything with sendmail. Just > configure the machines so each hostnames resolves, from the perspective > of the other machine. You could either create an /etc/hosts file on each > machine, or run DNS locally. Probably other ways as well. Let's say that > their hostnames are foo and bar - make it so that from foo you can 'ping > bar', and vice versa. > > Once that works, you ought to be able to log in to foo and send mail via > your favorite MUA to 'ian@bar' - note, that's just bar, not bar.com or > anything. Likewise you ought to be able to log in to bar and send mail > via your favorite MUA to 'ian@foo'. Assuming the user exists on both > machines, of course. > > I'm doing something like this with my internal mail at home, and it > works fine. > > > http://www.clanger9.org.uk/computer/explain.html > > Cute. > > -- > Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org > ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] That's exactly what I'm doing except the hosts are named hercules and pandora. A little exploring and I find that hercules can't telnet to pandora port 25 and the other way too. This looks like the mail "Sendmail + No Response from Port 25" I just spotted on the list. -- /Xian "Windows has detected that your mouse has moved. Reboot now for changes to take effect?" Unknown Author From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 17:46:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F1F16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:46:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DE343D54 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:46:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1EDC854366; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:46:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:46:43 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Joshua Kampmeier Message-ID: <20050407174642.GA83935@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200504070832.AA155058332@mail.changesplace.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504070832.AA155058332@mail.changesplace.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3 and 5.4RC1 both fail with CD upon installation(5.1 did not) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:46:45 -0000 --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 08:32:37AM -0500, Joshua Kampmeier wrote: > Here is the error I get when booting with(any) of the 5.3/5.4 discs: >=20 > acd0: CDRW at ata1-master UDMA33 > acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=3D0x00 ascq=3D0x00 error=3D0 > acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=3D0x00 ascq=3D0x00 error=3D0 > acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=3D0x00 ascq=3D0x00 error=3D0 > acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=3D0x00 ascq=3D0x00 error=3D0 > acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=3D0x00 ascq=3D0x00 error=3D0 > acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=3D0x00 ascq=3D0x00 error=3D0 > acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=3D0x00 ascq=3D0x00 error=3D0 > acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=3D0x00 ascq=3D0x00 error=3D0 > acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=3D0x00 ascq=3D0x00 error=3D0 >=20 > then it starts sysinstall except when I try to start the installation it = fails at mounting the CD-ROM. I can install in safe mode.. but then any tim= e there is a cd in the drive upon boot-up.. i get errors again. I think this is due to using DMA for ATAPI (i.e. accessing the CDROM), which many drives do not support properly. This was recently disabled, so the next RC should work. If not, send mail to stable@ instead of questions@ Kris --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCVXICWry0BWjoQKURAvZRAJ4jDjFZk97RVjzX+pvqm4sizsbC0QCfRm++ mzQsGKItyekabY6bz+NwHN8= =lKw/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 17:55:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C410A16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:55:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A1243D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:55:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ts4short@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so512408rng for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:55:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=lOZHJEgQqibZbjk+Wj40XjY9ZBI1R5OfWswb22k4bmLaRyVXfeEuGAkhXcuUqzT2tkxeol3hqjzjLF1RmfxcbuxdBD+1mlVhkIsPG3FgM4tS/Jw4ZzLVhAUSm7x2j4IWysrKIhe3q+4oRk8dqLmMpWbgJOmPc8ONGTwy6e7wc9Y= Received: by 10.38.74.9 with SMTP id w9mr689857rna; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:55:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.12.54 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:55:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4878093805040710556f71163f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:55:10 -0400 From: Todd Shirk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Todd Shirk In-Reply-To: <20050406200114.GA64643@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4878093805040612323d984eb0@mail.gmail.com> <20050406200114.GA64643@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Subject: Re: automount usb flash drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Todd Shirk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:55:12 -0000 Seems like the only thing that will work for me is to make a one-line shell script. I tried the various things you mentioned. I have yet to look at how to use amd(8). Setting vfs.usermount=1 and changing the ownership to the user name in question allows me to mount the usbkey without su'ing. I still can't get the usbd.conf to run an attach command on the umass* action. Thanks for your help. On Apr 6, 2005 4:01 PM, Roland Smith wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:32:14PM -0400, Todd Shirk wrote: > > I was trying to figure out how to have a usb flash drive automount > > when I plug it in. I currently have the following line in /etc/fstab > > > > /dev/da0s1 /mnt/usbkey msdos rw,-m700,noauto 0 0 > > > > and the following in /etc/devfs.conf > > > > perm da0s1 0666 > > devfs.conf only works for devices available at boot time. For devices > you can plug in at runtime you should use /etc/devfs.rules: > > [foobar=10] > add path 'da*s*' mode 0666 > > And you should have the following in /etc/rc.conf: > > devfs_system_ruleset="foobar" > > The contents of devfs.rules are fed to devfs(8), so see it's manual page. > > > when I do the following command line command the usb flash drive mount fine > > > > # mount /mnt/usbkey > > > > But, when I'm in KDE viewing media:/ Removable Device (da0s1) is > > shown is unmounted. > > > > At the user level command line and in KDE, I receive /dev/da0s1: > > Operation not permitted. > > For a user to be able to use a filesystem, there are a couple of things > that need to be done: > - The sysctl variable vfs.usermount must be set to 1 (in /etc/sysctl.conf). > - The user in question must own the mount point. > > > I'm not sure if part of the issue is permissions or if I'm missing a > > piece for the auto-mounting to happen. > > I think the latter. Normally usbd(8) is notified of USB events, but in > this case it seems to get events for the umass* device, not the da*s* > device that you'll want to use. There have been people who've used a > shell-script called by usbd to figure out the connection between > umass<->da from dmesg output and then mount the filesystem, but that > doesn't do umounts. It's also complicated if you want it to work for > multiple users, unless you give it 777 permissions. You could also give > amd(8) a try. > > I found that making a one-line shell script to do the mounting is much > less hassle. > > Roland > -- > R.F. Smith /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign > r s m i t h @ x s 4 a l l . n l \ / No HTML/RTF in e-mail > http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ X No Word docs in e-mail > public key: http://www.keyserver.net / \ Respect for open standards > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 17:58:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA6616A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:58:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22CB843D48 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:58:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maverick31337@vfemail.net) Received: from unknown (HELO ?219.197.212.112?) (fcknroll2@219.197.212.112 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2005 17:58:40 -0000 Message-ID: <425574CE.8000105@vfemail.net> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 02:58:38 +0900 From: "Tetsuji \"Maverick\" Rai" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050401 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Cannot use cvsup with 5.3-release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:58:43 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I want to keep my ports up to date. in 5.3-release (i386) So I copied a sample ports-supfile and edit as follows (just changed my host) However I got this message and I cannot figure out what "Release" means. In http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html#CVSUP-CONFIG-VERS Release is defined as "cvs." ==== su-3.00# cvsup -g -L 2 ports-suprile Parsing supfile "ports-supfile" Release not specified for collection "host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org" ==== What am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance!! - -----------------my "ports-supfile" # $FreeBSD: src/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile,v 1.32 2004/05/24 06:23:15 cjc Exp $ # # This file contains all of the "CVSup collections" that make up the # FreeBSD-current ports collection. # # CVSup (CVS Update Protocol) allows you to download the latest CVS # tree (or any branch of development therefrom) to your system easily # and efficiently (far more so than with sup, which CVSup is aimed # at replacing). If you're running CVSup interactively, and are # currently using an X display server, you should run CVSup as follows # to keep your CVS tree up-to-date: # # cvsup ports-supfile # # If not running X, or invoking cvsup from a non-interactive script, then # run it as follows: # # cvsup -g -L 2 ports-supfile # # You may wish to change some of the settings in this file to better # suit your system: # host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org # This specifies the server host which will supply the # file updates. You must change it to one of the CVSup # mirror sites listed in the FreeBSD Handbook at # http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mirrors.html. # You can override this setting on the command line # with cvsup's "-h host" option. # base=/var/db # This specifies the root where CVSup will store information # about the collections you have transferred to your system. # A setting of "/var/db" will generate this information in # /var/db/sup. Even if you are CVSupping a large number of # collections, you will be hard pressed to generate more than # ~1MB of data in this directory. You can override the # "base" setting on the command line with cvsup's "-b base" # option. This directory must exist in order to run CVSup. # prefix=/usr # This specifies where to place the requested files. A # setting of "/usr" will place all of the files requested # in "/usr/ports" (e.g., "/usr/ports/devel", "/usr/ports/lang"). # The prefix directory must exist in order to run CVSup. # Defaults that apply to all the collections # # IMPORTANT: Change the next line to use one of the CVSup mirror sites # listed at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mirrors.html. *default host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete use-rel-suffix src-all # If you seem to be limited by CPU rather than network or disk bandwidth, try # commenting out the following line. (Normally, today's CPUs are fast enough # that you want to run compression.) *default compress ## Ports Collection. # # The easiest way to get the ports tree is to use the "ports-all" # mega-collection. It includes all of the individual "ports-*" # collections, ports-all #(after this, all are commented out) - ----------------- - -- Tetsuji 'Maverick' Rai PGP Key fingerprint = 2021 6BF9 CEA3 73DE FF17 B326 F4DA F04E F784 3B85 gpg fingerprint Aviation Jokes: http://www.geocities.com/tetsuji_rai/ Profile http://maverick.ns1.name/ http://maverick.IsASecret.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCVXTO9NrwTveEO4URAuEXAJ9t41/Ffs17D29HGXOiuk+1W9sXIgCeJQ9a +bVZ1ipsSH1h+/yD0haAp7Q= =Xsbt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 18:08:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C0616A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:08:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B0943D46 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:08:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ts4short@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so515559rng for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:08:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QGoSBPsXETL3lb+dptjmjVobzb4m8cfO/EWsouRh8RFK7SkLk+eAbPdw1uwkY91Vp4LJgeuTdl2yKZfRRQQMesir8UYPa7sJ7zOGMwFmgk30daFVwICr4VVqDhxd3WpwN0bbuCtzNpJgGhzLkq0vbfrAjCIlrpV2wQhLz2rg8wE= Received: by 10.38.153.43 with SMTP id a43mr667933rne; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:08:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.12.54 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:08:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <487809380504071108162d812a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:08:10 -0400 From: Todd Shirk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Issue compiling JDK15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Todd Shirk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:08:13 -0000 Hi, I've been attempting to compile JDK15 on my AMD64 laptop. I have linux redhat 8 installed for linux compatibility and the linux-sun-jdk1.4.2 installed so that the /usr/ports/java/jdk15 would use the appropriate javac compiler to compile JDK15 natively. I reach a point where I receive the following message. execv(): Bad address Error trying to exec /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/bin/javac. Check if file exists and permissions are set correctly. gmake[3]: *** [.compile.classlist] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java/java' gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java' gmake[1] *** [all] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make' gmake: *** [j2se-build] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. I've checked and /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/bin/javac exists and permissions appear adequate. For giggles I chmod 777 on the file with the same results. Any thoughts? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 18:12:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE2016A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:12:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCC243D46 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:12:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 8514 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2005 18:12:03 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Apr 2005 18:12:02 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id C1F9A52; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:12:01 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Christopher Lane References: <42554DFD.6030200@inteliport.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Apr 2005 14:12:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <42554DFD.6030200@inteliport.com> Message-ID: <44fyy2focu.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: Sysinstall + CVSup or just CVSup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:12:04 -0000 Christopher Lane writes: > My goal is to have the latest ports, regardless of which ones I actually > want to install. I guess my question is more "can I CVSup without first > installing the ports collection, and if I do so, does that save time or > take longer?" The short answer is that you can do it, and it will probably cost you some time. The slightly longer answer is that how much time you save (by downloading the ports tree before doing a cvsup on it) depends on a number of factors, most notably your network bandwidth. There also are a few possible "gotchas" to keep in mind if you "adopt" an existing tree this way: see the CVSUP FAQ at http://www.cvsup.org/faq.html and particularly the questions in the "Recipes" section. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 18:16:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1754616A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:16:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6491043D58 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:16:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ts4short@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so517348rng for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:16:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=WCA+3rMr4m06odpV0sZGw63w5lRBuNlmqGlqqhiFfWQn8UbkBE4PzFdbk/GAIgMxjkPliBE9MyEVoEoh7UIUl/4YaN+5BlrNR5HEd+C5FGMO82c0+0jlTrLqxIT0Ce1ikz11mrG7Nh3/ZdonuTgd0VWgu7CYwmGeJgbgMu3JpHY= Received: by 10.38.5.72 with SMTP id 72mr928157rne; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.12.54 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <487809380504071116540222dd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:16:37 -0400 From: Todd Shirk To: Tetsuji Maverick Rai In-Reply-To: <425574CE.8000105@vfemail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <425574CE.8000105@vfemail.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot use cvsup with 5.3-release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Todd Shirk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:16:39 -0000 I ran into a problem like that when I did an upgrade to 5.4-prelease. I found for me, that for port updates it seems to look at your release level in your options. I went into root and ran sysinstall. I selected Options. At the bottom of the left hand column is the option Release Name. I changed it to 5.3-RELEASE. I'd probably check there, another thing I'll do is try a couple other cvsup sites. On Apr 7, 2005 1:58 PM, Tetsuji Maverick Rai wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I want to keep my ports up to date. in 5.3-release (i386) > > So I copied a sample ports-supfile and edit as follows (just changed > my host) > > However I got this message and I cannot figure out what "Release" > means. In > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html#CVSUP-CONFIG-VERS > Release is defined as "cvs." > > ==== > su-3.00# cvsup -g -L 2 ports-suprile > Parsing supfile "ports-supfile" > Release not specified for collection "host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org" > ==== > What am I doing wrong? > > Thanks in advance!! > > - -----------------my "ports-supfile" > # $FreeBSD: src/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile,v 1.32 2004/05/24 > 06:23:15 cjc Exp $ > # > # This file contains all of the "CVSup collections" that make up the > # FreeBSD-current ports collection. > # > # CVSup (CVS Update Protocol) allows you to download the latest CVS > # tree (or any branch of development therefrom) to your system easily > # and efficiently (far more so than with sup, which CVSup is aimed > # at replacing). If you're running CVSup interactively, and are > # currently using an X display server, you should run CVSup as follows > # to keep your CVS tree up-to-date: > # > # cvsup ports-supfile > # > # If not running X, or invoking cvsup from a non-interactive script, then > # run it as follows: > # > # cvsup -g -L 2 ports-supfile > # > # You may wish to change some of the settings in this file to better > # suit your system: > # > host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org > # This specifies the server host which will supply the > # file updates. You must change it to one of the CVSup > # mirror sites listed in the FreeBSD Handbook at > # http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mirrors.html. > # You can override this setting on the command line > # with cvsup's "-h host" option. > # > base=/var/db > # This specifies the root where CVSup will store > information > # about the collections you have transferred to your > system. > # A setting of "/var/db" will generate this information in > # /var/db/sup. Even if you are CVSupping a large number of > # collections, you will be hard pressed to generate more > than > # ~1MB of data in this directory. You can override the > # "base" setting on the command line with cvsup's "-b base" > # option. This directory must exist in order to run CVSup. > # > prefix=/usr > # This specifies where to place the requested files. A > # setting of "/usr" will place all of the files requested > # in "/usr/ports" (e.g., "/usr/ports/devel", > "/usr/ports/lang"). > # The prefix directory must exist in order to run CVSup. > > # Defaults that apply to all the collections > # > # IMPORTANT: Change the next line to use one of the CVSup mirror sites > # listed at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mirrors.html. > *default host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org > *default base=/var/db > *default prefix=/usr > *default release=cvs tag=. > *default delete use-rel-suffix > > src-all > > # If you seem to be limited by CPU rather than network or disk > bandwidth, try > # commenting out the following line. (Normally, today's CPUs are fast > enough > # that you want to run compression.) > *default compress > > ## Ports Collection. > # > # The easiest way to get the ports tree is to use the "ports-all" > # mega-collection. It includes all of the individual "ports-*" > # collections, > ports-all > #(after this, all are commented out) > - ----------------- > > - -- > Tetsuji 'Maverick' Rai > PGP Key fingerprint = 2021 6BF9 CEA3 73DE FF17 B326 F4DA F04E F784 3B85 > gpg fingerprint > Aviation Jokes: http://www.geocities.com/tetsuji_rai/ > Profile http://maverick.ns1.name/ > http://maverick.IsASecret.com/ > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFCVXTO9NrwTveEO4URAuEXAJ9t41/Ffs17D29HGXOiuk+1W9sXIgCeJQ9a > +bVZ1ipsSH1h+/yD0haAp7Q= > =Xsbt > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 18:18:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631F616A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:18:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF68F43D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:18:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDC860E7; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:18:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00690-03; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:18:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: by makeworld.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8471960D6; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:18:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E10C60D4; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:18:48 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:18:48 -0500 (CDT) From: Chris To: "Tetsuji \"Maverick\" Rai" In-Reply-To: <425574CE.8000105@vfemail.net> Message-ID: <20050407131817.P722@makeworld.com> References: <425574CE.8000105@vfemail.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot use cvsup with 5.3-release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:18:56 -0000 On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Tetsuji "Maverick" Rai wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > I want to keep my ports up to date. in 5.3-release (i386) > > So I copied a sample ports-supfile and edit as follows (just changed > my host) > > However I got this message and I cannot figure out what "Release" > means. In > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html#CVSUP-CONFIG-VERS > Release is defined as "cvs." > > ==== > su-3.00# cvsup -g -L 2 ports-suprile > Parsing supfile "ports-supfile" > Release not specified for collection "host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org" > ==== > What am I doing wrong? > > Thanks in advance!! > > - -----------------my "ports-supfile" > # $FreeBSD: src/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile,v 1.32 2004/05/24 > 06:23:15 cjc Exp $ > # > # This file contains all of the "CVSup collections" that make up the > # FreeBSD-current ports collection. > # > # CVSup (CVS Update Protocol) allows you to download the latest CVS > # tree (or any branch of development therefrom) to your system easily > # and efficiently (far more so than with sup, which CVSup is aimed > # at replacing). If you're running CVSup interactively, and are > # currently using an X display server, you should run CVSup as follows > # to keep your CVS tree up-to-date: > # > # cvsup ports-supfile > # > # If not running X, or invoking cvsup from a non-interactive script, then > # run it as follows: > # > # cvsup -g -L 2 ports-supfile > # > # You may wish to change some of the settings in this file to better > # suit your system: > # > host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org > # This specifies the server host which will supply the > # file updates. You must change it to one of the CVSup > # mirror sites listed in the FreeBSD Handbook at > # http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mirrors.html. > # You can override this setting on the command line > # with cvsup's "-h host" option. > # > base=/var/db > # This specifies the root where CVSup will store > information > # about the collections you have transferred to your > system. > # A setting of "/var/db" will generate this information in > # /var/db/sup. Even if you are CVSupping a large number of > # collections, you will be hard pressed to generate more > than > # ~1MB of data in this directory. You can override the > # "base" setting on the command line with cvsup's "-b base" > # option. This directory must exist in order to run CVSup. > # > prefix=/usr > # This specifies where to place the requested files. A > # setting of "/usr" will place all of the files requested > # in "/usr/ports" (e.g., "/usr/ports/devel", > "/usr/ports/lang"). > # The prefix directory must exist in order to run CVSup. > > # Defaults that apply to all the collections > # > # IMPORTANT: Change the next line to use one of the CVSup mirror sites > # listed at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mirrors.html. > *default host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org > *default base=/var/db > *default prefix=/usr > *default release=cvs tag=. > *default delete use-rel-suffix > > src-all > > # If you seem to be limited by CPU rather than network or disk > bandwidth, try > # commenting out the following line. (Normally, today's CPUs are fast > enough > # that you want to run compression.) > *default compress > > ## Ports Collection. > # > # The easiest way to get the ports tree is to use the "ports-all" > # mega-collection. It includes all of the individual "ports-*" > # collections, > ports-all > #(after this, all are commented out) > - ----------------- > > - -- > Tetsuji 'Maverick' Rai > PGP Key fingerprint = 2021 6BF9 CEA3 73DE FF17 B326 F4DA F04E F784 3B85 > gpg fingerprint > Aviation Jokes: http://www.geocities.com/tetsuji_rai/ > Profile http://maverick.ns1.name/ > http://maverick.IsASecret.com/ > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFCVXTO9NrwTveEO4URAuEXAJ9t41/Ffs17D29HGXOiuk+1W9sXIgCeJQ9a > +bVZ1ipsSH1h+/yD0haAp7Q= > =Xsbt > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Best regards, Chris Anything good in life is either illegal, immoral or fattening. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 18:22:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F3816A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:22:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3C643D2D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:22:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A231160E7; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:21:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00691-04; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:21:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: by makeworld.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F098C60D6; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:21:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05FD60D4; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:21:55 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:21:55 -0500 (CDT) From: Chris To: "Tetsuji \"Maverick\" Rai" In-Reply-To: <425574CE.8000105@vfemail.net> Message-ID: <20050407132038.D744@makeworld.com> References: <425574CE.8000105@vfemail.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot use cvsup with 5.3-release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:22:00 -0000 On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Tetsuji "Maverick" Rai wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > I want to keep my ports up to date. in 5.3-release (i386) > > So I copied a sample ports-supfile and edit as follows (just changed > my host) > > However I got this message and I cannot figure out what "Release" > means. In > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html#CVSUP-CONFIG-VERS > Release is defined as "cvs." > > ==== > su-3.00# cvsup -g -L 2 ports-suprile > Parsing supfile "ports-supfile" > Release not specified for collection "host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org" > ==== > What am I doing wrong? > > Thanks in advance!! Sorry about that last one. Anyways, your ports-supfile should have nothing more then this: *default host=cvsup3.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete use-rel-suffix ports-all I seen you had something that relates to src. Take that out. Best regards, Chris To know yourself is the ultimate form of aggression. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 18:25:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E521B16A4CF for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:25:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D1843D2D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:25:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C174360F4; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:25:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00690-07; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:25:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: by makeworld.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9F20360F3; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:25:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9826460E7; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:25:20 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:25:20 -0500 (CDT) From: Chris To: "Tetsuji \"Maverick\" Rai" In-Reply-To: <20050407132038.D744@makeworld.com> Message-ID: <20050407132326.S744@makeworld.com> References: <425574CE.8000105@vfemail.net> <20050407132038.D744@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot use cvsup with 5.3-release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:25:26 -0000 On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Chris wrote: > On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Tetsuji "Maverick" Rai wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> I want to keep my ports up to date. in 5.3-release (i386) >> >> So I copied a sample ports-supfile and edit as follows (just changed >> my host) >> >> However I got this message and I cannot figure out what "Release" >> means. In >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html#CVSUP-CONFIG-VERS >> Release is defined as "cvs." >> >> ==== >> su-3.00# cvsup -g -L 2 ports-suprile >> Parsing supfile "ports-supfile" >> Release not specified for collection "host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org" >> ==== >> What am I doing wrong? >> >> Thanks in advance!! > > Sorry about that last one. Anyways, your ports-supfile should have nothing > more then this: > > *default host=cvsup3.FreeBSD.org > *default base=/var/db > *default prefix=/usr > *default release=cvs tag=. > *default delete use-rel-suffix ports-all > > I seen you had something that relates to src. Take that out. > > > Best regards, > Chris > > To know yourself is the ultimate form of aggression. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Sorry again - properly formated... *default host=cvsup3.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete use-rel-suffix ports-all Best regards, Chris To know yourself is the ultimate form of aggression. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 18:42:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE0416A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:42:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C0143D46 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:42:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1102.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 860CA1C0008A for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:42:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1102.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 71A7C1C000AE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:42:25 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050407184225465.71A7C1C000AE@mwinf1102.wanadoo.fr Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:42:25 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1492434941.20050407204225@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: How can I log every login via telnet? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:42:27 -0000 Is there a way to log every login via telnet? -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 18:46:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9634716A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:46:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC4A643D2F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:46:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maverick31337@vfemail.net) Received: from unknown (HELO ?219.197.212.112?) (fcknroll2@219.197.212.112 with plain) by smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2005 18:46:12 -0000 Message-ID: <42557FF1.1070002@vfemail.net> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 03:46:09 +0900 From: "Tetsuji \"Maverick\" Rai" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050401 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris References: <425574CE.8000105@vfemail.net> <20050407132038.D744@makeworld.com> <20050407132326.S744@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <20050407132326.S744@makeworld.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot use cvsup with 5.3-release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:46:14 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Chris wrote: > >> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Tetsuji "Maverick" Rai wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> >>> I want to keep my ports up to date. in 5.3-release (i386) >>> >>> So I copied a sample ports-supfile and edit as follows (just >>> changed my host) >>> >>> However I got this message and I cannot figure out what >>> "Release" means. In >>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html#CVSUP-CONFIG-VERS >>> >>> >>> Release is defined as "cvs." >>> >>> ==== su-3.00# cvsup -g -L 2 ports-suprile Parsing supfile >>> "ports-supfile" Release not specified for collection >>> "host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org" ==== What am I doing wrong? >>> >>> Thanks in advance!! >> >> >> Sorry about that last one. Anyways, your ports-supfile should >> have nothing more then this: >> >> *default host=cvsup3.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default >> prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete >> use-rel-suffix ports-all >> >> I seen you had something that relates to src. Take that out. >> >> >> Best regards, Chris >> >> To know yourself is the ultimate form of aggression. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To >> unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > Sorry again - properly formated... > > *default host=cvsup3.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default > prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete > use-rel-suffix ports-all > > > > > Best regards, Chris > > To know yourself is the ultimate form of aggression. > I removed src-all but getting the same error message "Release not specified for collection"....I seem not to have specified release. But in this ports-supfile, release is set to "cvs"....what's wrong? - -- Tetsuji 'Maverick' Rai PGP Key fingerprint = 2021 6BF9 CEA3 73DE FF17 B326 F4DA F04E F784 3B85 gpg fingerprint Aviation Jokes: http://www.geocities.com/tetsuji_rai/ Profile http://maverick.ns1.name/ http://maverick.IsASecret.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCVX/x9NrwTveEO4URAgFYAJ9W6GjImjenhZnJZdcUScgTSNlv3QCbB2IW 9WRgAULy/DdZS03ohYgfYsk= =ytsW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 18:49:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D208116A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:49:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B67843D5E for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:49:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873FB60E7; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:49:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00841-03; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:49:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: by makeworld.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 62DDC60D6; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:49:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5021160D4; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:49:11 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:49:11 -0500 (CDT) From: Chris To: "Tetsuji \"Maverick\" Rai" In-Reply-To: <42557FF1.1070002@vfemail.net> Message-ID: <20050407134806.P896@makeworld.com> References: <425574CE.8000105@vfemail.net> <20050407132038.D744@makeworld.com> <20050407132326.S744@makeworld.com> <42557FF1.1070002@vfemail.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot use cvsup with 5.3-release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:49:18 -0000 On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Tetsuji "Maverick" Rai wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Chris wrote: > >> On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Chris wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Tetsuji "Maverick" Rai wrote: >>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> >>>> I want to keep my ports up to date. in 5.3-release (i386) >>>> >>>> So I copied a sample ports-supfile and edit as follows (just >>>> changed my host) >>>> >>>> However I got this message and I cannot figure out what >>>> "Release" means. In >>>> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html#CVSUP-CONFIG-VERS >>>> >>>> >>>> Release is defined as "cvs." >>>> >>>> ==== su-3.00# cvsup -g -L 2 ports-suprile Parsing supfile >>>> "ports-supfile" Release not specified for collection >>>> "host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org" ==== What am I doing wrong? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance!! >>> >>> >>> Sorry about that last one. Anyways, your ports-supfile should >>> have nothing more then this: >>> >>> *default host=cvsup3.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default >>> prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete >>> use-rel-suffix ports-all >>> >>> I seen you had something that relates to src. Take that out. >>> >>> >>> Best regards, Chris >>> >>> To know yourself is the ultimate form of aggression. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To >>> unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> Sorry again - properly formated... >> >> *default host=cvsup3.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default >> prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete >> use-rel-suffix ports-all >> >> >> >> >> Best regards, Chris >> >> To know yourself is the ultimate form of aggression. >> > I removed src-all but getting the same error message "Release not > specified for collection"....I seem not to have specified release. > But in this ports-supfile, release is set to "cvs"....what's wrong? > > - -- > Tetsuji 'Maverick' Rai > PGP Key fingerprint = 2021 6BF9 CEA3 73DE FF17 B326 F4DA F04E F784 3B85 > gpg fingerprint > Aviation Jokes: http://www.geocities.com/tetsuji_rai/ > Profile http://maverick.ns1.name/ > http://maverick.IsASecret.com/ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFCVX/x9NrwTveEO4URAgFYAJ9W6GjImjenhZnJZdcUScgTSNlv3QCbB2IW > 9WRgAULy/DdZS03ohYgfYsk= > =ytsW > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > Does it say: release=cvs tag=. Read mine again, ensure it's verbatim. Best regards, Chris If an item is advertised as "under $50," you can bet it's not $19.95. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 18:56:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CD316A4DA for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:56:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mirapoint2.tis.cwru.edu (mirapoint2.TIS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.104.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DC343D55 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:56:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ttt@cwru.edu) Received: from [129.22.151.155] (tagon.ENGINEERING.CWRU.Edu [129.22.151.155]) by mirapoint2.tis.cwru.edu (MOS 3.5.4-GR) with ESMTP id DUO46019 (AUTH ttt); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:56:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42558243.2090601@cwru.edu> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:56:03 -0400 From: Tom Trelvik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <425574CE.8000105@vfemail.net> In-Reply-To: <425574CE.8000105@vfemail.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Cannot use cvsup with 5.3-release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:56:06 -0000 Tetsuji "Maverick" Rai wrote: > *default host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org > *default base=/var/db > *default prefix=/usr > *default release=cvs tag=. > *default delete use-rel-suffix > > src-all I don't think you want "tag=." as the default. That would put you the most current sources for the OS, which may have plenty of transient issues you don't want to have to deal with. I use the following supfile regularly. You can see that I set the default tag to RELENG_5_3 which is basically the original release of 5.3 plus security updates (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html). I do that because these are servers that I try to keep as stable as possible. For a personal system, you may prefer to use RELENG_5 to get something more up to date, without being the bleeding edge of CVS updates. You can also see that I specify a different tag to grab for ports, so that I can get the updates on them. *default host=cvsup12.freebsd.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_3 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all ports-all tag=. Good luck, Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 19:19:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7198A16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:19:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prosporo.hedron.org (hedron.org [66.11.182.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C1A43D3F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:19:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ean@hedron.org) Received: from www.hedron.org (localhost.hedron.org [127.0.0.1]) by prosporo.hedron.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C846EC0D1; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:20:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 216.220.59.169 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ean); by www.hedron.org with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:20:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3110.216.220.59.169.1112901639.squirrel@216.220.59.169> In-Reply-To: <42553A2E.4070005@haystacks.org> References: <42531440.30103@adelphia.net> <200504051850.33281.ean@hedron.org> <1112789082.28348.5.camel@mis3c.rtl.lan> <1318.216.220.59.169.1112812328.squirrel@216.220.59.169> <42553A2E.4070005@haystacks.org> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:20:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ean Kingston" To: "Eric McCoy" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Ean Kingston Subject: Re: suspending login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:19:41 -0000 > Ean Kingston wrote: >> If you change the password entry then, when you want >> to enable the user again, the user has to enter a new password. This >> way, >> the user keeps his/her old password. Note, the question asked for >> suspend, >> not remove. I read suspend as implying that the account may be used >> again. > > No, you don't replace the password, you just insert an invalid character > - one which can never be the result of crypt(). That invalid character > is typically an asterisk. To unlock the account, you remove the > asterisk. It's how pw usermod -L and -U work. I hadn't considered that. I will be doing that from now on. Thanks. > For the OP, it's important to use all three approaches if your victim is > untrustworthy. If you change the password but nothing else he can still > get in via SSH; if you change the shell but nothing else he can still > get in via FTP (possibly); if you change the home directory but nothing > else he can still get in via SSH (and mess with /tmp or /var/tmp). So > if you are locking out the user to preserve evidence of some misdeed, be > sure to do all three. > > If this is just a real-life buddy who's welching on some money he owes > you, though, doing only one will probably be sufficient. (Well, doing > one and saying things to him like "I bought a .45 last week" and "It > turns out that if you do enough cocaine most juries won't convict you of > murder.") I hadn't thought of that either. -- Ean Kingston E-Mail: ean_AT_hedron_DOT_org PGP KeyID: 1024D/CBC5D6BB URL: http://www.hedron.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 19:19:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A66916A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:19:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F52843D69 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:19:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maverick31337@vfemail.net) Received: from unknown (HELO ?219.197.212.112?) (fcknroll2@219.197.212.112 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2005 19:19:48 -0000 Message-ID: <425587D2.4040404@vfemail.net> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 04:19:46 +0900 From: "Tetsuji \"Maverick\" Rai" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050401 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Trelvik References: <425574CE.8000105@vfemail.net> <42558243.2090601@cwru.edu> In-Reply-To: <42558243.2090601@cwru.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot use cvsup with 5.3-release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:19:51 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tom Trelvik wrote: > Tetsuji "Maverick" Rai wrote: > >> *default host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default >> prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete >> use-rel-suffix >> >> src-all > > > I don't think you want "tag=." as the default. That would put you > the most current sources for the OS, which may have plenty of > transient issues you don't want to have to deal with. > > I use the following supfile regularly. You can see that I set the > default tag to RELENG_5_3 which is basically the original release > of 5.3 plus security updates > (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html). > I do that because these are servers that I try to keep as stable > as possible. For a personal system, you may prefer to use RELENG_5 > to get something more up to date, without being the bleeding edge > of CVS updates. You can also see that I specify a different tag to > grab for ports, so that I can get the updates on them. > > *default host=cvsup12.freebsd.org *default base=/var/db *default > prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_3 *default delete > use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all ports-all tag=. > > Good luck, > > Tom ____________ Thanks all. It's simpler than I expected!! I got it to work!!! - -- Tetsuji 'Maverick' Rai PGP Key fingerprint = 2021 6BF9 CEA3 73DE FF17 B326 F4DA F04E F784 3B85 gpg fingerprint Aviation Jokes: http://www.geocities.com/tetsuji_rai/ Profile http://maverick.ns1.name/ http://maverick.IsASecret.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCVYfS9NrwTveEO4URAgk/AJ9E2Vb2sVj4I1R/YywbMBTFiP4JsQCgg0pI 78D//IeSb3/DtXUEIiz3ujg= =RufJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 19:21:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEA916A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:21:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52A343D39 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:21:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2079060E7; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:21:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00816-07; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:21:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: by makeworld.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 358F660D6; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:21:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3094E60D4; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:21:15 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:21:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Chris To: Tom Trelvik In-Reply-To: <42558243.2090601@cwru.edu> Message-ID: <20050407141806.P1023@makeworld.com> References: <425574CE.8000105@vfemail.net> <42558243.2090601@cwru.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot use cvsup with 5.3-release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:21:20 -0000 On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Tom Trelvik wrote: > Tetsuji "Maverick" Rai wrote: >> *default host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org >> *default base=/var/db >> *default prefix=/usr >> *default release=cvs tag=. >> *default delete use-rel-suffix >> >> src-all > > I don't think you want "tag=." as the default. That would put you > the most current sources for the OS, which may have plenty of transient > issues you don't want to have to deal with. > > I use the following supfile regularly. You can see that I set the > default tag to RELENG_5_3 which is basically the original release of 5.3 plus > security updates > (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html). I > do that because these are servers that I try to keep as stable as possible. > For a personal system, you may prefer to use RELENG_5 to get something more > up to date, without being the bleeding edge of CVS updates. You can also see > that I specify a different tag to grab for ports, so that I can get the > updates on them. > > *default host=cvsup12.freebsd.org > *default base=/var/db > *default prefix=/usr > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_3 > *default delete use-rel-suffix > *default compress > src-all > ports-all tag=. > > Good luck, > If I'm not mistaken, he did mention the ports supfile. What I gave him (assuming he only wants one supfile for ports, and one for src) is simply that. It's a very basic, to the point supfile. He needs nothing more then what I posted. The above reflects (to me atleast) the makings of a supfile for gathering the src tree. Perhaps I read him wrong, perhaps I took for granted he only wanted a ports supfile. If I'm right, then what I gave him is all he needs. He does not need to be muddied with thigs that have zero to do with supping the ports tree. Best regards, Chris The night before the english history mid-term, your biology instructor will assign 200 pages on planaria. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 19:24:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E411216A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:24:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C14E43D2D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:24:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFAA660E7 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:24:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00816-08 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:24:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: by makeworld.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2509C60D6; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:24:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E7260D4 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:24:41 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:24:40 -0500 (CDT) From: Chris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1492434941.20050407204225@wanadoo.fr> Message-ID: <20050407142330.I1062@makeworld.com> References: <1492434941.20050407204225@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic Subject: Re: How can I log every login via telnet? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:24:44 -0000 On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Is there a way to log every login via telnet? > > -- > Anthony Anthony, have a look at /etc/syslog.conf In addition, see the man page also. It's pretty to the point. Best regards, Chris It is better for civilization to be going down the drain, than to be coming up it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 19:25:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E339716A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:25:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D23C43D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:25:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0395760D4 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:25:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00816-09 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:25:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: by makeworld.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5197760E7; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:25:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C57A60D6 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:25:37 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:25:37 -0500 (CDT) From: Chris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050407142330.I1062@makeworld.com> Message-ID: <20050407142518.G1103@makeworld.com> References: <1492434941.20050407204225@wanadoo.fr> <20050407142330.I1062@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic Subject: Re: How can I log every login via telnet? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:25:40 -0000 On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Chris wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > >> Is there a way to log every login via telnet? >> >> -- >> Anthony > > Anthony, > have a look at /etc/syslog.conf In addition, see the man page also. > It's pretty to the point. Actually, man 8 syslogd Best regards, Chris It is better for civilization to be going down the drain, than to be coming up it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 19:27:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A6816A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:27:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B951B43D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:27:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 59A7D5641E; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 07:27:14 +1200 (NZST) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 07:27:14 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: Jani Luukkanen Message-ID: <20050407192714.GA3678@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <4254EE05.8000302@soundflows.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4254EE05.8000302@soundflows.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serial console connection problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:27:18 -0000 On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 11:23:33AM +0300, Jani Luukkanen wrote: > Hi! > > I have an issue with serial console connection with two FreeBSD machines > (Both with Intel SE7210TP1-E motherboard, other configured as "host" > from bios and other has ordinary com ports which are connected with > normal tested serial cable). > > Host machine is running FreeBSD 5.3 and the "client" one 4.10. > > Problem is that when trying to open the serial connection with tip, > error occurs as; > > /root@mos root # tip com1 > tip: /dev/cuaa0: Device busy > link down Try running fstat(1) against /dev/cuaa0 to try to find out what's holding the device. If I understand you correctly, you're doing this on the 4.10 machine. > > Main question is that how to get access first to the com1 port generally > and second to get ahold of the remote screen on the other end of the > serial cable? Make sure that you haven't got a getty running at the same time on both sides, and that you've got a null-modem connection between the two hosts instead of a straight thru'. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Power corrupts, Absolute Power is pretty neat From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 19:37:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7CB16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:37:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from orb.pobox.com (orb.pobox.com [207.8.226.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D12143D1D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:37:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from LukeD@pobox.com) Received: from orb (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orb.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BF87D9 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:37:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from evrtwa1-ar19-4-41-048-029.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net (evrtwa1-ar19-4-41-048-029.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net [4.41.48.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by orb.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545458A for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:37:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:37:14 -0700 (PDT) From: LukeD@pobox.com X-X-Sender: lukas@border.crystalsphere.multiverse To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1492434941.20050407204225@wanadoo.fr> Message-ID: <20050407123413.E7596@border.crystalsphere.multiverse> References: <1492434941.20050407204225@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: How can I log every login via telnet? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: LukeD@pobox.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:37:22 -0000 On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Is there a way to log every login via telnet? The system already records all logins in /var/log/auth.log. You could pull out the telnet entries with grep if those are the only ones you're interested in. If you're wanting to build your own log then I don't know. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 19:40:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D921F16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:40:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1205C43D2F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:40:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maverick31337@vfemail.net) Received: from unknown (HELO ?219.197.212.112?) (fcknroll2@219.197.212.112 with plain) by smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2005 19:40:22 -0000 Message-ID: <42558CA4.7020903@vfemail.net> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 04:40:20 +0900 From: "Tetsuji \"Maverick\" Rai" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050401 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris References: <425574CE.8000105@vfemail.net> <42558243.2090601@cwru.edu> <20050407141806.P1023@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <20050407141806.P1023@makeworld.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Tom Trelvik Subject: Re: Cannot use cvsup with 5.3-release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:40:25 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Tom Trelvik wrote: > >> Tetsuji "Maverick" Rai wrote: >> >>> *default host=cvsup.jp.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db >>> *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete >>> use-rel-suffix >>> >>> src-all >> >> >> I don't think you want "tag=." as the default. That would put >> you the most current sources for the OS, which may have plenty of >> transient issues you don't want to have to deal with. >> >> I use the following supfile regularly. You can see that I set >> the default tag to RELENG_5_3 which is basically the original >> release of 5.3 plus security updates >> (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html). >> I do that because these are servers that I try to keep as stable >> as possible. For a personal system, you may prefer to use >> RELENG_5 to get something more up to date, without being the >> bleeding edge of CVS updates. You can also see that I specify a >> different tag to grab for ports, so that I can get the updates on >> them. >> >> *default host=cvsup12.freebsd.org *default base=/var/db *default >> prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_3 *default delete >> use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all ports-all tag=. >> >> Good luck, >> > > If I'm not mistaken, he did mention the ports supfile. What I gave > him (assuming he only wants one supfile for ports, and one for src) > is simply that. > > It's a very basic, to the point supfile. He needs nothing more then > what I posted. The above reflects (to me atleast) the makings of a > supfile for gathering the src tree. > > Perhaps I read him wrong, perhaps I took for granted he only wanted > a ports supfile. If I'm right, then what I gave him is all he > needs. He does not need to be muddied with thigs that have zero to > do with supping the ports tree. > > > Best regards, Chris > > The night before the english history mid-term, your biology > instructor will assign 200 pages on planaria. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To > unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Don't mind, I made independent supfiles for ports and src. It's much easier than I expected..I wonder why I coundn't find a solution with google. - -- Tetsuji 'Maverick' Rai PGP Key fingerprint = 2021 6BF9 CEA3 73DE FF17 B326 F4DA F04E F784 3B85 gpg fingerprint Aviation Jokes: http://www.geocities.com/tetsuji_rai/ Profile http://maverick.ns1.name/ http://maverick.IsASecret.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQFCVYyj9NrwTveEO4URAtZ8AJwJLw7+/60GEa2HdpwVUBnJqhJUxQCYrhRb HYY1SryI2yuuwVNZC+qXkg== =GO/g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 19:42:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E3E16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:42:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.prometric.com (smtp2.prometric.com [63.95.218.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A59D43D31 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:42:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SunBeta@prometric.com) Received: From PMDUSRGCSMTP.pro.tl.thomcorp.net ([10.20.0.4]) by smtp2.prometric.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.345); id 1112903164281; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:46:04 -0400 Received: from pmnusmail01.pro.tl.thomcorp.net ([10.70.0.95]) by PMDUSRGCSMTP.pro.tl.thomcorp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:42:45 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:42:44 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: unknown Thread-Index: AcU7qfgJSNUDC2kEToyvFuF4mBaobAAAAAA6 From: "SunBeta," To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2005 19:42:45.0686 (UTC) FILETIME=[F8A2D560:01C53BA9] Subject: RE: Your note to SunBeta@Prometric.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:42:47 -0000 Thank you for contacting SunBeta@Prometric.com. Currently, there are no = SUN Beta exams being offered. =20 If you are inquiring about your beta test results, please note the dates = listed below. =20 SCJP 5.0 beta exam Test results are expected to be posted to the i7 = http://i7lp.integral7.com/sun database by approximately 4/25/2005 You should receive your hard copy score report by mail by = approximately 5/16/2005 =20 SCSA 10 part 1 Test results are expected to be posted to the i7 = http://i7lp.integral7.com/sun database by approximately 4/27/2005 You should receive your hard copy score report by mail by = approximately 5/18/2005 =20 SCSA 10 part 2 Test results are expected to be posted to the i7 = http://i7lp.integral7.com/sun database by approximately 4/29/2005 You should receive your hard copy score report by mail by = approximately 5/20/2005 =20 SCNA 10 Test results are expected to be posted to the i7 = http://i7lp.integral7.com/sun database by approximately 5/2/2005 You should receive your hard copy score report by mail by = approximately 5/23/2005 =20 If your question is not covered by the above information, we will reply = to your email within 2-3 business days. =20 Sincerely, =20 SunBeta@ Prometric.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 19:44:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A1916A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:44:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CB843D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:44:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C56860D4; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:44:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01145-04; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:44:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: by makeworld.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2CCE960F3; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:44:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250D260D6; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:44:01 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:44:01 -0500 (CDT) From: Chris To: LukeD@pobox.com In-Reply-To: <20050407123413.E7596@border.crystalsphere.multiverse> Message-ID: <20050407144056.L1226@makeworld.com> References: <1492434941.20050407204225@wanadoo.fr> <20050407123413.E7596@border.crystalsphere.multiverse> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How can I log every login via telnet? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:44:05 -0000 On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 LukeD@pobox.com wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote: >> Is there a way to log every login via telnet? > > The system already records all logins in /var/log/auth.log. > You could pull out the telnet entries with grep if those are the only ones > you're interested in. > If you're wanting to build your own log then I don't know. something like this in /etc/syslog.conf !telnetd *.* /var/log/telnet.log Best regards, Chris Some come to the fountain of knowledge to drink, some prefer to just gargle. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 19:47:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6631216A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:47:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nas.net (kappa.nas.net [199.243.225.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCBA43D39 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:47:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.list@nas.net) X-NAS-RecipientsChecked: yes X-NAS-Virus: yes X-ExtScanner: Niversoft's FindAttachments Received: from [216.145.96.36] (HELO LAMBDA) by nas.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 62517679 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:46:41 -0400 Message-ID: <0fa401c53baa$9ea9e2a0$0f01010a@netaccess1.nas.net> From: "Irina" To: References: <20050407165151.9F47316A4D3@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:47:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Subject: MySQL client only X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:47:57 -0000 Hello at FreeBSD list. I am having a problem with MySQL on a server. When I access MySQL server 4.1.10 from a C program (or on the command line), I have this ERROR 1043: Bad handshake It says I should upgrade my client on this server. Trying to do so by doing Updated ports/database collection # cd /usr/ports/databases/mysql41-client # make >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/mysql-4.1.11.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) >> Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this >> port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql41-client. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql41-client. Not sure what to do. Or, may be my mistake was that I CVSUPed only ports/databases? Thank you for your help in advance. Irina From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 19:58:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D287F16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:58:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D6943D4C for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:58:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so541358rng for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:58:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KUfqlBSGbDatMVvGr1wbqREmoWJfxtvUWv80WUakjZM2cObTUQqA9TIJr4nkFOn6ea06GtE5gJrscjHpjp/7hWwMBSRdEAo/4llxwXakaxF9yjS3KUDBrS/OgolnnYHacJlav6S8I/nSyc00UJhSnlR/fY7+kMURK3QCD9YKTsU= Received: by 10.38.5.72 with SMTP id 72mr1015414rne; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?127.0.0.1? ([59.93.160.56]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 74sm490219rnb.2005.04.07.12.58.48; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <425590DD.3060001@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:28:21 +0530 From: Subhro User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Irina References: <20050407165151.9F47316A4D3@hub.freebsd.org> <0fa401c53baa$9ea9e2a0$0f01010a@netaccess1.nas.net> In-Reply-To: <0fa401c53baa$9ea9e2a0$0f01010a@netaccess1.nas.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MySQL client only X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:58:53 -0000 Irina wrote: > >Not sure what to do. > >Or, may be my mistake was that I CVSUPed only ports/databases? > > Partial updates are never a good idea. However in this case it seems to me as if your link is givig you problems. Can you access other things on the internet? Regards S. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 20:12:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D61B16A4CF for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:12:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pobox.webstakez.com (pobox.webstakez.com [24.75.44.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93BC043D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:12:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ababurko@adelphia.net) Received: (qmail 68022 invoked by uid 1014); 7 Apr 2005 20:14:06 -0000 Received: from 24.75.44.254 by pobox.webstakez.com (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.24 (clamdscan: 0.83/761. spamassassin: 2.64. perlscan: 1.24. Clear:RC:1(24.75.44.254):. Processed in 0.222415 secs); 07 Apr 2005 20:14:06 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: ababurko@adelphia.net via pobox.webstakez.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.24 (Clear:RC:1(24.75.44.254):. Processed in 0.222415 secs) Received: from firewall.prvlb.net (HELO ?192.168.254.131?) (bob@phreakout.net@24.75.44.254) by pobox.webstakez.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2005 20:14:05 -0000 Message-ID: <42559410.6060201@adelphia.net> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:12:00 -0400 From: Bob Ababurko User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1492434941.20050407204225@wanadoo.fr> <20050407123413.E7596@border.crystalsphere.multiverse> <20050407144056.L1226@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <20050407144056.L1226@makeworld.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: How can I log every login via telnet? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 20:12:07 -0000 Chris wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 LukeD@pobox.com wrote: > >> >> On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote: >> >>> Is there a way to log every login via telnet? >> >> >> The system already records all logins in /var/log/auth.log. >> You could pull out the telnet entries with grep if those are the only >> ones you're interested in. >> If you're wanting to build your own log then I don't know. > > > something like this in /etc/syslog.conf > > !telnetd > *.* /var/log/telnet.log > > Best regards, > Chris > > Some come to the fountain of knowledge to drink, > some prefer to just gargle. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Could I do something similar for logging scponly? I have scponly installed and would like to log everyones logins and all files that get transferred. I cannot fins any features in the program itself to do the logging so I think that syslog is the choice. Is that all there is to implementing syslog logging or do i need to make sure that scponly spits out info that can be logged? -Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 20:24:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B21F16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:24:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C5843D49 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:24:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050407202419.SSNJ5402.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish> for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:24:19 -0400 From: To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:24:18 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: beastie 5.X boot menu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 20:24:20 -0000 The boot menu has changed between 4.x and 5.x releases. I have searched the handbook and can not find any written documentation about the new beastie boot options, what they are and when each one is intended to be used. I see a lot of posts about the beastie figure but nothing about what the options mean. If it's written somewhere can someone point me to it and if not can I get an explanation? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 20:27:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1899116A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:27:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4281243D1F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:27:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DJdXI-0005Je-J3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:23:32 +0200 Received: from ns.ag.dn.ua ([213.130.22.147]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:23:32 +0200 Received: from arcade by ns.ag.dn.ua with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:23:32 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Volodymyr Kostyrko Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:24:18 +0300 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <20050407135650.25130.qmail@web81010.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ns.ag.dn.ua User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; uk-UA; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050327 In-Reply-To: <20050407135650.25130.qmail@web81010.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: Sendmail + No Response from Port 25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 20:27:03 -0000 JP wrote: > I need some advice, I am running FreeBSD 5.3 and am having problems getting sendmail to be accessable from outside the LAN. If I am on the LAN and perform a "telnet 192.168.1.254 25" sendmail responds. But anywhere outside of the LAN I cannot get sendmail to respond. I can telnet to it just fine remotely as well as Ftp. I am using PPP since I have a PPPoE connection. First, what are your sendmail related variables in /etc/rc.conf? Second. Is your computer configured to be a firewall? Does it permits anyone to connect to port 25 from outside? -- [WBR], Arcade. [SAT Astronomy/Think to survive!] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 21:15:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE3516A4D6 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:15:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF4743D58 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:15:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tlpbsd@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so665937wra for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:15:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Qdo+sOYdn9nIplkNCJK3ptsZWDYFM4ZYeuE2pYcmRodUXPmTkz4PQQn96aAVny9qnl4Ed4KZ7d20qCT8PC6rg8z/Kq/WVJcC5agMchoTxepdCbtfs81rWrWhBctJ5Yc2G1O4A1Hork422z1KSpoxValPayAgqmyEltSWuYMntJg= Received: by 10.54.24.49 with SMTP id 49mr2140585wrx; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.37.79 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9533da6c05040714154080fcdb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:15:08 -0600 From: Travis Poppe To: Didier Wiroth In-Reply-To: <99f113a61084.4252ff36@etat.lu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <99f113a61084.4252ff36@etat.lu> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vesa 1024x768 mode in future version? to the freebsd community X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Travis Poppe List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:15:09 -0000 I would also love to see these patches committed and ready to use in a future release. I've been wanting to see this functionality since I started using FreeBSD five or so years ago. Myself and a friend have used these patches for quite some time now with no known stability issues. They work just fine. There is a minor problem with audio and scrolling (the audio breaks up and becomes distorted), but this is a problem I have had with audio in many other every day scenarios as well. Search the -CURRENT mailing lists and you should find a few posts I've written about this audio problem, as well as posts by many others. At least three people ask me on a regular basis if these have been committed, as I keep a close eye on them. It would be highly appreciated by many if this functionality were included. Thanks, -Travis Poppe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 21:37:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F2F16A4CE; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:37:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FEBE43D1F; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:37:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from [208.206.78.97] (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by mail.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D057A423; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4255A836.3060708@elischer.org> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:37:58 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Travis Poppe References: <99f113a61084.4252ff36@etat.lu> <9533da6c05040714154080fcdb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9533da6c05040714154080fcdb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Didier Wiroth cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vesa 1024x768 mode in future version? to the freebsd community X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:37:59 -0000 point me at the patches again? Travis Poppe wrote: >I would also love to see these patches committed and ready to use in a >future release. I've been wanting to see this functionality since I >started using FreeBSD five or so years ago. > >Myself and a friend have used these patches for quite some time now >with no known stability issues. They work just fine. There is a minor >problem with audio and scrolling (the audio breaks up and becomes >distorted), but this is a problem I have had with audio in many other >every day scenarios as well. Search the -CURRENT mailing lists and you >should find a few posts I've written about this audio problem, as well >as posts by many others. > >At least three people ask me on a regular basis if these have been >committed, as I keep a close eye on them. It would be highly >appreciated by many if this functionality were included. > >Thanks, > >-Travis Poppe >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 22:05:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955A116A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 22:05:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E41B43D1D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 22:05:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 17974 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2005 22:05:13 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Apr 2005 22:05:13 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4B96252; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:05:12 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Apr 2005 18:05:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <448y3ui6p4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 28 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: beastie 5.X boot menu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:05:13 -0000 writes: > The boot menu has changed between 4.x and 5.x releases. I have > searched the handbook and can not find any written documentation > about the new beastie boot options, what they are and when each one > is intended to be used. I see a lot of posts about the beastie > figure but nothing about what the options mean. If it's written > somewhere can someone point me to it and if not can I get an > explanation? Seriously? Well, let's see. ACPI: see "man acpi" for a start. Safe Mode: configures the system to avoid all possible hardware compatibility problems, at a severe cost in performance. single user mode: see the Handbook. verbose logging: many informational messages will be logged (by the kernel) to the console in the process of booting. Escape to loader prompt: see "man loader". USB keyboard: take your computer to your nearest computer store and ask them whether you have a USB keyboard or not. Generally, "default" will be the right answer unless you know you need something else. Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 22:50:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B994116A4D0 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 22:50:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3D443D1D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 22:50:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so573716rng for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:50:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=g5BQa+2FHJ8hW1GXoQwhhpLR78KCj0ixOcDk/0G44aJjGVuAaROWnRJAmha8C761XRZAZc67ZyTV+nYY46fBm8++LFi5V/dsy86nBN8JpDaFjjdE4P/xtT2OdzBpbigKi37jTiBqalbhmO7ZXhFNKaGu3c87l7i1SubJXHOFEk4= Received: by 10.38.4.80 with SMTP id 80mr1169991rnd; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:50:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:50:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 00:50:47 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: usb console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:50:48 -0000 Is it possible to do the console thingie not with a null modem serial cable but with a usb cable ? When you do the serial console, it means that you have a screen like it was the other pc's screen, right ? With boot messages and everything, able to do whatever you want like your keybord and screen was connected to the serial server itself right ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 23:00:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D805916A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 23:00:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neptune.atopia.net (neptune.atopia.net [209.128.231.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798C243D31 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 23:00:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: by neptune.atopia.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C16BE4133; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:00:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by neptune.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6A240AF for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:00:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:00:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050407185914.I83304@neptune.atopia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: finger not working, service very slow with ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:00:23 -0000 Howdy, Finger is working for some of my system accounts, and not others. A check of the log displays the following: Apr 7 16:50:29 uranus slapd[57684]: conn=85 op=0 BIND dn="cn=pamclient,ou=SystemAccounts,dc=mydomain,dc=net" method=128 Apr 7 16:50:29 uranus slapd[57684]: conn=85 op=0 BIND dn="cn=pamclient,ou=SystemAccounts,dc=mydomain,dc=net" mech=SIMPLE ssf=0 Apr 7 16:50:29 uranus slapd[57684]: conn=85 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text= Apr 7 16:50:29 uranus slapd[57684]: conn=85 op=1 SRCH base="ou=People,dc=mydomain,dc=net" scope=1 deref=0 filter="(objectClass=posixAccount)" Apr 7 16:50:29 uranus slapd[57684]: conn=85 op=1 SRCH attr=uid userPassword uidNumber gidNumber cn homeDirectory loginShell gecos description objectClass Apr 7 16:50:30 uranus slapd[57684]: conn=85 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=4 nentries=500 text= Apr 7 16:50:30 uranus slapd[57684]: conn=85 fd=19 closed and it returns "user mjuszczak not found". Whats funny is that it returns 500 entries, even though there is only one mjuszczak user. This could also be the reason that logging into the server is taking absolutely forever. A login takes about a minute, and the tail -f of ldap.log with loglevel 128 shows it searching every single user, all 7000 ... for some reason. Could my indexes in slapd.conf possibly be off, or is this something I messed up in freebsd's pam.d? Here is the index list btw for slapd.conf, but of course if this is an ldap problem I will be contacting that email list anyway. index objectClass eq index sudoUser pres,eq index uid pres,eq Thanks in advance! -Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 00:04:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CB316A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 00:04:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org (asylum.afflictions.org [64.7.134.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B4743D53 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 00:04:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgerow@afflictions.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968DF78C5D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:05:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pandora.afflictions.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95044-02 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:05:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dementia.afflictions.org (dementia.afflictions.org [172.19.206.56]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9506478C35 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:05:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by dementia.afflictions.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7799533C23; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:04:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:04:36 -0400 From: Damian Gerow To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050408000435.GB89855@afflictions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3D7 D901 A53A 1A99 BFD6 E6DF 9F3B 742B C288 9CC9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pandora.afflictions.org Subject: gpg-agent help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:04:46 -0000 I'm trying to get gpg-agent to work with mutt, with very little success. I start up the agent in ~/.xinitrc: eval `/usr/local/bin/gpg-agent --daemon -s` Have gnupg configured to use the agent in .gnupg/gpg.conf: use-agent And use what seems to be a pretty standard agent configuration: pinentry-program /usr/local/bin/pinentry-qt no-grab default-cache-ttl 1800 The problem is that GnuPG doesn't seem to want to actually /use/ the agent. When I try to sign something, pinentry-qt launches, I enter my passphrase, and the file is successfully signed. Every time. There's no passphrase caching (which is what gpg-agent does, correct?). The only thing that might be weird is that my signing key is actually a /secondary/ key, but I wouldn't have thought that would cause issues. gpg throws no errors. Nothing about gpg-agent not being available. It just plain doesn't seem to want to work for me, nor tell me why: % gpg -v -as test.txt=20 gpg: using secondary key 9C22B029 instead of primary key C2889CC9 You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: "Damian Gerow " gpg: using secondary key 9C22B029 instead of primary key C2889CC9 1024-bit DSA key, ID 9C22B029, created 2004-04-10 (main key ID C2889CC9) gpg: writing to `test.txt.asc' gpg: DSA/SHA1 signature from: "9C22B029 Damian Gerow " % Any help? Please Cc: me, as I'm not on the list... - Damian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 00:22:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CB616A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 00:22:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca [142.179.111.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6302343D45 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 00:22:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sandy@krvarr.bc.ca) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j37JDbA7076930 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:13:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sandy@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca) Received: (from sandy@localhost) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id j37JDaFu076927; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:13:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sandy) From: Sandy Rutherford MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16981.34396.918396.208453@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:13:32 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1492434941.20050407204225@wanadoo.fr> References: <1492434941.20050407204225@wanadoo.fr> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.3.1 X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner-Information: Please contact postmaster@krvarr.bc.ca for more information. X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact postmaster@krvarr.bc.ca for details. X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner-From: sandy@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca Subject: Re: How can I log every login via telnet? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:22:17 -0000 >>>>> On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:42:25 +0200, >>>>> Anthony Atkielski said: > Is there a way to log every login via telnet? Check /var/log/auth.log. They should be logged there by default. You could also use tcpwrappers for better control over access and logging. See /etc/hosts.allow and "man 5 hosts_options". Sandy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 01:11:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4730D16A4CE; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 01:11:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16ABD43D55; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 01:11:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (davidxu@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j381Btqp080406; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 01:11:56 GMT (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4255DA77.10401@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:12:23 +0800 From: David Xu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Didier Wiroth References: <99f113a61084.4252ff36@etat.lu> In-Reply-To: <99f113a61084.4252ff36@etat.lu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vesa 1024x768 mode in future version? to the freebsd community X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:11:58 -0000 In long run, I really want KGI to be in kernel rather than this footshot hack, give me full framebuffer support. David Xu Didier Wiroth wrote: >Dear FreeBSD Team, >Dear FreeBSD Users, > >I was wondering if the patches (see link below) have any chances to make their ways into a future release version or may be in the ports collection? > >Here are the patches I'm talking about: >http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/vesa >Actually the vidcontrol.diff patch failed for me so I used these patches: >http://www.nbritton.org/uploads/current-vesa_patch.tar.gz > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 01:18:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F278E16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 01:18:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51007.mail.yahoo.com (web51007.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45F8943D3F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 01:18:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tfcheng@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 42560 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Apr 2005 01:18:46 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=eH2+ILSL7HjXDTVZYmY1YosMn4zFN8cW9IHFDvVnC9F/25PFaLrkD1tZmGQmc48Hf20glDPgfeeDoSPQ8HqfpDf4W+Wr1vDiyjDx8tWQDzv1K7XQraxJS9Oa8+J5POrTKiv6GSZO8UdirlwcW3787LsDqS0lUjqRqbvTXxaqyWg= ; Message-ID: <20050408011846.42558.qmail@web51007.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.113.106.60] by web51007.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:18:46 CST Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:18:46 +0800 (CST) From: "T.F. Cheng" To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: how to modify "configure"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:18:48 -0000 Hi, I am installing an app starting with "./configure", it failed while looking for "jpeglib.h". I have that under "/usr/local/include" but I guess it only looked into "/usr/X11R6/include". I am not a source coder to begin with, and I read "INSTALL" and found out that I can generate a new "configure" file by running "autoconf259 configure.ac". I thought it would work, but still failed to locate "jpeglib.h". Can anyone give me a hand here? Much appreciated. Best Regards, Tsu-Fan Cheng _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? µn°O§K¶Oªº @yahoo.com ¤¤¤å¹q¤l¶l¥ó @ http://chinese.mail.yahoo.com Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://chinese.mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 02:12:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F0D16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 02:12:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7648543D4C for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 02:12:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tlpbsd@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so725825wra for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:12:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=XVPGXSjmoOz3AzPGDJnMK0AdzaGIQJB2TMoA+1EUxE++ds1Lm5dxmFCzj4na5HXeHyeZw7FnaLbDv/uC2Kb6yckaLH7O7RpCuClRszJgSrfj07Rkz0yQXlIhoqMwJ1spOKcnS39IQSqnufSVHCrm2MLtggCuRsMPKJhATTATK0o= Received: by 10.54.50.73 with SMTP id x73mr1286338wrx; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.37.79 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9533da6c050407191239539efd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:12:11 -0600 From: Travis Poppe To: David Xu In-Reply-To: <4255DA77.10401@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <99f113a61084.4252ff36@etat.lu> <4255DA77.10401@freebsd.org> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Didier Wiroth cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vesa 1024x768 mode in future version? to the freebsd community X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Travis Poppe List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 02:12:12 -0000 On Apr 7, 2005 7:12 PM, David Xu wrote: > In long run, I really want KGI to be in kernel rather than this footshot > hack, > give me full framebuffer support. I'm sure many of us would prefer to see KGI in the long run. However, that's not going to happen for quite some time. For now, this does the job just fine. -Travis Poppe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 02:27:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BD416A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 02:27:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from proxy.ddcom.co.jp (proxy.ddcom.co.jp [211.121.191.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2506943D31 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 02:27:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rees@ddcom.co.jp) Received: (qmail 18793 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2005 02:40:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO matthew) (10.10.10.11) by mail.ddcom.local with SMTP; 8 Apr 2005 02:40:06 -0000 Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:27:38 +0900 From: Joel To: FreeBSD Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20050407160107.GA66262@thought.org> References: <20050407160107.GA66262@thought.org> Message-Id: <20050408110124.F72C.REES@ddcom.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.06 Subject: Re: [OT] is there a ThinkPad clone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 02:27:40 -0000 On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:01:07 -0700 Gary Kline wrote > People, > > Apologies up front if anybody thinks this is *too* far OT, I'm having a _really_ hard time focusing on work for the shock this caused me. I can't imagine anyone actually _choosing_ to use those mutant cursor-bumping descendants of game pads. But some people like cramped keyboards for similar reasons, too. > but if the 8 months I've been using FreeBSD on my TP 600E > (400MHz, 288M, 12G). it has become my favorite computer. > __Not__ having that std mouse-pad thing where you scratch > or drag or tap your fingers lets me rest the heel of my left > hand dead-center and type away. The tiny mouse-stick and the > three cut/paste bars work well too. After reading the pdf Andrew gave a link to, I realized that when my wrists started hurting some time back, I seem to have subconsciously altered my typing habits. My hands float now, and, although I still lean too much on my elbows, I at least am keeping my wrists straight now. Maybe reading Ben Wing's pages way back when helped me get motivated to change my habits. > When I upgrade, I'd like another laptop with the same > layout. The few other laptops I've looked at all have > that mouse-pad. Anybody know if there is anything like > a "ThinkPad clone"?? Now I think I understand why Apple has not built an ultra-light. But it takes all kinds. I don't have any idea whether ultra-lights in the states have that cursor-bumper control stick, but, near as I can tell, it's in practically every ultralight sold in Japan. (One of many reasons I have not bought one of Sony's 5x7 units to try installing fBSD on.) The cut/paste bars also sound familiar, I'm thinking I never could figure them out on Fujitsu units. So, if you have a reason to be in Japan, plan a stop in and around Akihabara (or Nipponbashi and Umeda) and you should find plenty such gadgets. Now maybe I can get back to work. -- Joel Rees digitcom, inc. $B3t<02q ** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 02:41:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9155E16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 02:41:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E2F43D48 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 02:41:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tomasq@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 34so349330nzf for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:41:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=f2wRXe23e/NtETylxi1XaFhQjX8agDmX1D+skHYdkTVMsVJGaGnO6rRebxsYBPk1Yi1ecvWToCN3itbXA4bR+4zbcloqAUP37WDKEVUc25SXPRaRNMvEn5vaYAa+fBa7FfFuxnnPJpR4DVz/Bf7w2QQv09s0PFOH3wDVN41ImSM= Received: by 10.36.4.2 with SMTP id 2mr76809nzd; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.2.19 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9e46c99e05040719415f9ced8f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 22:41:32 -0400 From: Tomas Quintero To: Lowell Gilbert In-Reply-To: <448y3ui6p4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <448y3ui6p4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> cc: bob@a1poweruser.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: beastie 5.X boot menu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tomas Quintero List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 02:41:34 -0000 Theres a few ways to disable beastie, and sorry for the top posting: Firstly, there was a large discussion about this started by someone and it is on marc.theaimsgroup http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-questions&w=2&r=1&s=Stupid+ASCII+loader+prompt+&q=b I didn't feel like reading them all again, but the answer to your problem IS in one of those. The way to disable the beastie loader is: in /boot/loader.conf set beastie_disable="YES" Enjoy, Tomas On 07 Apr 2005 18:05:11 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > writes: > > > The boot menu has changed between 4.x and 5.x releases. I have > > searched the handbook and can not find any written documentation > > about the new beastie boot options, what they are and when each one > > is intended to be used. I see a lot of posts about the beastie > > figure but nothing about what the options mean. If it's written > > somewhere can someone point me to it and if not can I get an > > explanation? > > Seriously? > > Well, let's see. > > ACPI: see "man acpi" for a start. > Safe Mode: configures the system to avoid all possible hardware > compatibility problems, at a severe cost in performance. > single user mode: see the Handbook. > verbose logging: many informational messages will be logged (by the > kernel) to the console in the process of booting. > Escape to loader prompt: see "man loader". > USB keyboard: take your computer to your nearest computer store and > ask them whether you have a USB keyboard or not. > > Generally, "default" will be the right answer unless you know you need > something else. > > Good luck. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 03:32:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018DC16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 03:32:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB07443D48 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 03:32:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1101.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 91E5A1C00089 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 05:32:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1101.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 758291C00087 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 05:32:45 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050408033245481.758291C00087@mwinf1101.wanadoo.fr Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 05:32:45 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <856341966.20050408053245@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <16981.34396.918396.208453@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca> References: <1492434941.20050407204225@wanadoo.fr> <16981.34396.918396.208453@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: How can I log every login via telnet? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 03:32:47 -0000 Sandy Rutherford writes: > Check /var/log/auth.log. They should be logged there by default. Thanks, that's just what I was looking for. > You could also use tcpwrappers for better control over access and > logging. See /etc/hosts.allow and "man 5 hosts_options". I'd be mainly interested in restricting which user names can log on from the Net through telnet, rather than which IP addresses. Also, securing the traffic over the telnet session is unimportant (including passwords), because none of the telnet use would involve anything confidential. I mainly want to ensure that only a select handful of users can actually log in through telnet, and that those uses cannot escape to a shell by any means or otherwise stray outside the program that I want to run immediately upon login. I've tweaked my test program to eliminate possible buffer overflows on input and it has no facility for escaping to a shell, and it does virtually no file I/O and only to hard-coded paths, so hopefully it's not too much of a risk. -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 03:57:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A1E16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 03:57:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53302.mail.yahoo.com (web53302.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BB7043D48 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 03:57:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from non_secure@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 84860 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Apr 2005 03:57:43 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=xXL8dYqmURwAFkIutg1xC7ExhneiBM8xFmLCYh+oL4rjRRByh8aChAFDteZu8O2MHYEUf45iRvWvRB5U/dsMfgXCgvR+AV16lcBsueiwDfDGdhYim27Si81D9GSg17QxY+GDpVyxZExSDIl91n5yU3ws8+Bux+DYmMPJHu9fu8I= ; Message-ID: <20050408035743.84858.qmail@web53302.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.94.26.201] by web53302.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 20:57:43 PDT Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:57:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Joe Schmoe To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: setting an alias in .cshrc with parentheses in it ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 03:57:45 -0000 Hello, I often run this command: lynx -useragent "blah blah (compatible; MSIE blah blah)" Note that the custom referrer string that I set includes parentheses. So, to save time, I added this line to my .cshrc: alias lynx lynx -useragent "blah blah (compatible; MSIE blah blah)" However, when I run lynx, I get this error: Badly placed ()'s If I escape the parentheses with a backslash in .cshrc, it also doesn't work - it splits the line up and lynx thinks that the next command line argument begins where the first backslash is inserted. So how do I include a command alias that contains parentheses into .cshrc ? thanks. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. http://personals.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 04:25:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF6F16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 04:25:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54005.mail.yahoo.com (web54005.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C33EB43D1D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 04:25:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 88823 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Apr 2005 04:25:28 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=WziPHTb95fu+TFddE4KKapeoOhHX3Wie0GeHTJCsYIKJ5X9phSD/bi4ycJlw1i2ZMxu4zhE53TuklfcIRavHSdHNpau2tXFKG2S3pLynVKc+aEIhpw6SVQYVcrSbJN9vR2uNOwEjbYgmz+wKr70e7iybFZ7/QFKSSRNJ6/4N0KU= ; Message-ID: <20050408042528.88821.qmail@web54005.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [147.46.44.181] by web54005.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:25:28 PDT Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:25:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Rob To: FreeBSD questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: 5.4: sendmail doesn't deliver to local user? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 04:25:29 -0000 Hi, Sendmail refused to deliver to myself as a local user on my 10.0.0.3 IP configured PC; this IP is behind a dual-homed gateway. /etc/rc.conf: hostname="simulation" sendmail_enable="YES" /etc/hosts.allow: sendmail : localhost 127.0.0.1 : allow /etc/hosts 10.0.0.3 simulation simulation. So I can ping 'simulation' as 10.0.0.3. No problems! In /etc/mail I have done: # make all install # /etc/rc.d/sendmail restart When I now send email to my own login account: $ mail -s "subject" rob < somefile.txt I don't receive anything in my mailbox. In /var/log/maillog I get: Apr 8 13:08:53 simulation sendmail[2175]: j3848rks002175: from=rob, size=31, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200504080408.j3848rks002175@simulation.>, relay=rob@localhost Apr 8 13:08:53 simulation sm-mta[2176]: j3848rua002176: from=, size=342, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200504080408.j3848rks002175@simulation.>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=IPv4, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1] Apr 8 13:08:53 simulation sendmail[2175]: j3848rks002175: to=rob, ctladdr=rob (1001/1001), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=30031, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (j3848rua002176 Message accepted for delivery) Apr 8 13:10:08 simulation sm-mta[2178]: j3848rua002176: to=, delay=00:01:15, xdelay=00:01:15, mailer=esmtp, pri=30342, relay=antivortex.snu.ac.kr. [147.46.230.127], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Operation timed out with antivortex.snu.ac.kr. Why does it time out on "antivortex.snu.ac.kr", if I only send the mail to my local account. Note that "nslookup simulation.snu.ac.kr" indeed gives 'antivortex.snu.ac.kr' and its IP number. Apparently somebody else on the 'real internet' also uses an alias for my hostname 'simulation'. But why does that stop sendmail delivering locally? Any idea what's wrong here? Thanks for your help. Rob. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 04:27:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48AF16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 04:27:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from f19.mail.ru (f19.mail.ru [194.67.57.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622BF43D1D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 04:27:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from o_sema@mail.ru) Received: from mail by f19.mail.ru with local id 1DJl5u-000NqL-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:27:46 +0400 Received: from [147.32.98.175] by win.mail.ru with HTTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:27:46 +0400 From: Oleksandr Semenko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [147.32.98.175] Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:27:46 +0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Subject: Sound problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Oleksandr Semenko List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 04:27:47 -0000 I have problems with sound on FreeBSD 5.3 on KDE 3.3.0. My ASUS P4P800SE motherboard has "ADI AD (Analog Device) 1985 Sound MAX 6-channel CODEC" sound card. I don't know if it is supported. In the list of supported sound drivers I found snd_ad_1816 driver, but it doesn't work with my card. System detects my sound card correctly when I use the "kldload snd_drivers" command: "Analog Device AD1985 Ac 97 Codec". But there is no such driver like snd_ad1985, only snd_ad1816!!! 1. Every time when I use only this "snd_ad1816" driver by typing "kldload snd_ad1816" or adding "snd_ad1816_load="YES"" in /boot/loader.conf file, I have the following message: "Sound server informational message: Error while initializing the sound driver: device /dev/dsp can't be opened (No such file or directory) The sound server will continue, using the null output device." At the same time there is no record in /dev/sndstat file and no /dev/dsp file. 2. There is no such bad message when I load all!!! drivers: "kldload snd_drivers" or add "snd_driver_load="YES"" in /boot/loader.conf file. But still no sound! On the other hand several empty /dev/dsp files appears: dsp0.0;dsp0.1;dspr0.1;dspW0.0;dspW0.1. And the following record appears in /dev/sndstat: "FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) Installed devices: pcm0: at io 0xfebff800, 0xfebff400 irq 17 bufsz 16384 kld snd_ich (1p/1r/0v channels duplex default)" I will be appreciate if someone can help me. Regards, Sasha From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 04:28:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBB016A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 04:28:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0066443D31 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 04:28:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pergesu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 37so944415wra for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:28:35 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=t6rILu6lqam1MGlmatERSUwb79hd19oV4eT6IbUv0xX08ai1DVQsP6m48ptUXFWUHrT11PwUeTbA9pJCxx/dWvTy4h9C1DG3uc/Xn5S2gUUf082G09qen4aNGipWAqKg83RcuAsz76ICHdDKPQZwpyzzuZBt1DmLvfgL//Fsy5Q= Received: by 10.54.47.56 with SMTP id u56mr49643wru; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.42.28 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <810a540e050407212817eb7cee@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 22:28:35 -0600 From: Pat Maddox To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Can't control PostgreSQL with RC scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pat Maddox List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 04:28:36 -0000 I installed PostgreSQL 8.0.1 from ports, and now I'd like to control it with the RC scripts. I wasn't able to run initdb with the scripts, I had to do that manually with the regular initdb command. Now I've got the db dir as /usr/local/pgsql/data, which is what it looks like pgsql expects, but the scripts still won't start it or stop it. They don't produce any output either. Any ideas on what to do? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 05:41:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3236A16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 05:41:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mattvirushome.dynu.com (h139-055-210-165.adsl.navix.net [139.55.210.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0B243D2F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 05:41:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mattvirus@navix.net) Received: from [192.168.0.95] (mattvirushome.dynu.com [10.0.0.20]) j385frs7071698 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 00:41:53 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mattvirus@navix.net) Message-ID: <4256198E.1010000@navix.net> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:41:34 -0500 From: matt virus User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Freebsd 5.2.1 Ntop 3.1 error.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 05:41:56 -0000 cvsup'd my ports and installed ntop. Seems to work GREAT for about 5 minutes and then i get this error in my log: **ERROR** Reading packets on device 0 (xl0): 'read: Inappropriate ioctl for device' anybody else seen this ? -- Matt Virus ("veer-iss") http://www.mattvirus.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 05:50:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E8216A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 05:50:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mattvirushome.dynu.com (h139-055-210-165.adsl.navix.net [139.55.210.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CD043D53 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 05:50:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mattvirus@navix.net) Received: from [192.168.0.95] (mattvirushome.dynu.com [10.0.0.20]) j385o5s7071723 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 00:50:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mattvirus@navix.net) Message-ID: <42561B7A.7040207@navix.net> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:49:46 -0500 From: matt virus User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd References: <4256198E.1010000@navix.net> In-Reply-To: <4256198E.1010000@navix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Ntop 3.1 error.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 05:50:07 -0000 matt virus wrote: > cvsup'd my ports and installed ntop. Seems to work GREAT for about 5 > minutes and then i get this error in my log: > > **ERROR** Reading packets on device 0 (xl0): 'read: Inappropriate ioctl > for device' > > anybody else seen this ? > > further reading suggests there is a patch to download to patch this problem with 4.x distributions and inquires about the 5.x branch port/package being fixed. Seems as though the port skeleton does not apply the patch. Any plans of updating it? -- Matt Virus ("veer-iss") http://www.mattvirus.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 06:31:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1885016A4CF for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:31:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993E543D41 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:31:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from attackers@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 1so478969rny for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:31:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=I53107C1VxgUnlxplzJt2NOdN/5fX+MTtY2VvGzRZooSFVRvtSAkGNlH20Yq2/Nc2WH+hJu1wHB4CEpA9IOBYJAazZ0XUcGTve/urAGWP2MRRqlpLe2PyfN6C/X8X3fR9rwgwX2T3AhYFKy+0GoV+GH6GgOcHFs4xWF7nljrNxg= Received: by 10.38.2.80 with SMTP id 80mr933408rnb; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:31:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.44 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 23:31:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4f34b68f050407233115bd3f27@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:31:57 +0700 From: John Meing To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, wizlayer@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <200504070805.18085.wizlayer@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4f34b68f05040704381700d67e@mail.gmail.com> <200504070805.18085.wizlayer@gmail.com> Subject: Re: install.cfg (was RE: & No Subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Meing List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:31:58 -0000 Mike I also tried to use only following line in install.cfg (without the rc.conf lines) command="passwd root" system which should not has mismatching quote errors (and I tested with /stand/sysinstalld and it worked) but it didn't work when i put it in install.cfg :(( John Meing On Apr 7, 2005 7:05 PM, wizlayer wrote: > On Thursday 07 April 2005 07:38 am, John Meing wrote: > > Dear Mike > > > > Here are few guides i used to create this install.cfg. > > > > http://mypage.bluewin.ch/dazdaz/freebsd_sysinstall.html > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sysinstall&apropos=0&s > >ektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+4.11-RELEASE&format=html > > > > I also try command line version of sysinstall like > > # /stand/sysinstall command="passwd root" system > > > > and it was works, but I don't know why it doesn't work with > > install.cfg > > > > John Meing > > Open mouth, insert foot... There is a command! :) > > Okay, but that still doesn't work for the syntax... Going back to > your original post: > > > command="echo sendmail_enable="NONE" >> /etc/rc.conf" system > > would at best cause mismatching quote errors (which is what I'm > assuming you're getting?) > > Mike > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 06:39:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A92416A4CE; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:39:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from daumantas.is.lt (daumantas.is.lt [193.219.14.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5533643D41; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:39:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Edvardas@togilas.lt) Received: from yranga ([193.219.14.222]) by daumantas.is.lt (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id j386c0u1093588; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:38:07 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from Edvardas@togilas.lt) From: "Edvardas Butrimas" To: , , , Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:39:43 +0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Scanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Scanner: Found to be clean X-Scanner-From: edvardas@togilas.lt Subject: SE7520BD2SCSI mainboard not suported hardware ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:39:49 -0000 Hi, Sorry for my english I have problem with Intel® Server Board SE7520BD2SCSI. http://www.intel.com/design/servers/boards/se7520bd2/index.htm Two Ultra320/LVD channels via the LSI Logic 53C1030 SCSI controller and connected via two internal 68-pin-wide connectors; maximum data transfer 320 MB/sec on each Ultra320/LVD controller, supporting RAID 0 and 1, and support for modular ROMB (Intel RAID Controller SRCZCRX) SCSI disks works terribly. They copy 3mb/s. Does the disks are in RAID or single they works terribly. I try other SCSI controler on PCI, but the problem the same. I try different OS, like freebsd i386 4.11, 5.3, amd64 5.3(it suports E7520 chipset), NetBSD 2.0, only windows 2003 works fine. Intel mainboard CD have drivers for Windows, UnixWare, SUSE, Red Hat, NetWare. Do you have any suggestions? any ideas ? Here is server SE7520BD2SCSI INTEL (BRANDON SCSI) SERVER BOARD OEM BX80546KG3000EA INTEL XEON 3.0GHZ 800FSB 1M BOX, ACTIVE KVR333X72RC25/512 512MB 333MHZ DDR ECC REGISTERED CL2.5 DIMM ST373207LW SEAGATE CHEETAH 10K.7 73GB U320SCA 68-PIN SC5275E INTEL SERVER CHASSIS SC5275E dmesg: Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.3-RC1 #0: Sun Oct 17 01:25:37 UTC 2004 root@wv1u.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (2992.51-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbff Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 1073610752 (1023 MB) avail memory = 1041047552 (992 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 6 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 7 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard ioapic2 irqs 48-71 on motherboard npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 cpu2: on acpi0 cpu3: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 1.0 (no driver attached) pcib1: irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: at device 0.0 on pci1 pci2: on pcib2 mpt0: port 0xc400-0xc4ff mem 0xfceb0000-0xfcebffff,0xfcec0000-0xfcecffff irq 26 at device 5.0 o n pci2 mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] mpt1: port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xfcee0000-0xfceeffff,0xfcef0000-0xfcefffff irq 25 at device 5.1 o n pci2 mpt1: [GIANT-LOCKED] pci1: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pcib3: at device 0.2 on pci1 pci3: on pcib3 pci1: at device 0.3 (no driver attached) pcib4: irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 pcib5: irq 16 at device 5.0 on pci0 pcib5: could not get PCI interrupt routing table for \\_SB_.PCI0.EPB1 - AE_NOT_FOUND pci5: on pcib5 pci5: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pcib6: irq 16 at device 6.0 on pci0 pci6: on pcib6 pcib7: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci7: on pcib7 em0: port 0xec00-0xec3f mem 0xfebe0000-0xfebfffff irq 16 at device 4. 0 on pci7 em0: Ethernet address: 00:0e:0c:4e:e3:f8 em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A pci7: at device 12.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xfc00-0xfc0f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) acpi_button0: on acpi0 acpi_button1: on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model MouseMan+, device ID 0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] orm0: at iomem 0xcf800-0xd07ff,0xce800-0xcf7ff,0xca800-0xce7ff,0xc0000-0xca7ff on isa0 pmtimer0 on isa0 ppc0: parallel port not found. sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec acpi_cpu: throttling enabled, 8 steps (100% to 12.5%), currently 100.0% acd0: CDROM at ata0-slave UDMA33 Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle da0 at mpt1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 139756MB (286220288 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 17816C) SMP: AP CPU #2 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #3 Launched! Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 06:51:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A61616A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:51:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wizard.online.ee (wizard.online.ee [194.106.96.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A998543D3F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:51:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jani@soundflows.com) Received: (qmail 5886 invoked by uid 79); 8 Apr 2005 09:51:23 +0300 Received: from 194.106.123.34 by wizard (envelope-from , uid 78) with qmail-scanner-1.24st (clamdscan: 0.81/704. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24st. Clear:RC:0(194.106.123.34):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.224928 secs); 08 Apr 2005 09:51:23 +2000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?194.106.123.34?) (194.106.123.34) by wizard.online.ee with SMTP; 8 Apr 2005 09:51:23 +0300 Message-ID: <4256298D.7080704@soundflows.com> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:49:49 +0300 From: Jani Luukkanen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Chen References: <4254EE05.8000302@soundflows.com> <20050407192714.GA3678@osiris.chen.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <20050407192714.GA3678@osiris.chen.org.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serial console connection problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:51:26 -0000 Hi Jonathan and thanks for reply! Jonathan Chen wrote: >I have an issue with serial console connection with two FreeBSD machines >(Both with Intel SE7210TP1-E motherboard, other configured as "host" >from bios and other has ordinary com ports which are connected with >normal tested serial cable). > >Host machine is running FreeBSD 5.3 and the "client" one 4.10. > >Problem is that when trying to open the serial connection with tip, >error occurs as; > >/root@mos root # tip com1 >tip: /dev/cuaa0: Device busy >link down > > > > > Weird, fstat shows nothing on the port; root@mos root # fstat /dev/cuaa0 USER CMD PID FD MOUNT INUM MODE SZ|DV R/W NAME root@mos root # And yes, this is problem is on the 4.10 machine which is connecting to the 5.3 one. >Try running fstat(1) against /dev/cuaa0 to try to find out what's >holding the device. If I understand you correctly, you're doing this >on the 4.10 machine. > > > >>Main question is that how to get access first to the com1 port generally >>and second to get ahold of the remote screen on the other end of the >>serial cable? >> >> > > > Might be this is the problem, here is all gettys running on the 4.10 machine: root 246 0.0 0.1 956 516 v7 Is+ 16Mar05 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv7 root 245 0.0 0.1 956 516 v6 Is+ 16Mar05 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv6 root 244 0.0 0.1 956 516 v5 Is+ 16Mar05 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv5 root 243 0.0 0.1 956 516 v4 Is+ 16Mar05 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv4 root 242 0.0 0.1 956 516 v3 Is+ 16Mar05 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv3 root 241 0.0 0.1 956 516 v2 Is+ 16Mar05 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv2 root 240 0.0 0.1 956 516 v1 Is+ 16Mar05 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv1 root 239 0.0 0.1 956 516 v0 Is+ 16Mar05 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv0 root 238 0.0 0.1 956 516 d0 Is 16Mar05 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty std.9600 console The last one (console) does not appear on the 5.3 machines processlist, would it be safe to kill that one just like that with kill -9 238 (If that is the process locking the port)? The connection is ordinary serial cable, do you mean that should specify from BSD side what kind of connection is it? >Make sure that you haven't got a getty running at the same time on >both sides, and that you've got a null-modem connection between the two >hosts instead of a straight thru'. > >Cheers. > > Thanks and Cheers, Jani From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 06:59:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C501F16A4CE; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:59:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postino-2.etat.lu (postino-2.etat.lu [194.154.205.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCCE43D48; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:59:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu) Received: from avirus-2.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-2.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.7]) by postino-2.etat.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB9E1115000; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:59:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from avirus-2.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-2.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.7]) by localhost (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 2) with ESMTP id 6FA763567A; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:59:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by dispatch-2.cie.etat.lu (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 2) with ESMTP id 5D46F33629; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:59:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEM000R48RE3OA0@store.etat.lu>; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:59:38 +0200 (MEST) Received: from LUCY ([148.110.43.189]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEM007TE8RB74A0@store.etat.lu>; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:59:38 +0200 (MEST) Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:59:39 +0200 From: Didier Wiroth In-reply-to: <4255DA77.10401@freebsd.org> To: 'David Xu' Message-id: <0IEM007TL8RE74A0@store.etat.lu> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcU71/e452B6e9uNS+anmogfBuYSvgAMFF1w cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: vesa 1024x768 mode in future version? to the freebsd community X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:59:40 -0000 Hi, Yessss ... please give me full framebuffer support too :-)) If it can't make it's way to 5, perhaps it could be part of release 6? >In long run, I really want KGI to be in kernel rather than this footshot hack, give me full framebuffer support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 07:45:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F2B16A4CF for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 07:45:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D5B43D39 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 07:45:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A14C05641C; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:44:57 +1200 (NZST) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:44:57 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: Jani Luukkanen Message-ID: <20050408074457.GA5989@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <4254EE05.8000302@soundflows.com> <20050407192714.GA3678@osiris.chen.org.nz> <4256298D.7080704@soundflows.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4256298D.7080704@soundflows.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serial console connection problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 07:45:01 -0000 On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:49:49AM +0300, Jani Luukkanen wrote: [...] > Weird, fstat shows nothing on the port; > > root@mos root # fstat /dev/cuaa0 > USER CMD PID FD MOUNT INUM MODE SZ|DV R/W NAME > root@mos root # > > And yes, this is problem is on the 4.10 machine which is connecting to > the 5.3 one. > [...] > Might be this is the problem, here is all gettys running on the 4.10 > machine: [...] > root 238 0.0 0.1 956 516 d0 Is 16Mar05 0:00.00 > /usr/libexec/getty std.9600 console > > The last one (console) does not appear on the 5.3 machines processlist, > would it be safe to kill that one just like that with kill -9 238 (If > that is the process locking the port)? You have to do a bit more than this. First you have to disable the getty on the 4.10 machine by editing /etc/ttys, and then "kill -HUP 1" and then kill the getty if it still exists. You then have to enable the getty on the the 5.3 box by editing /etc/ttys and then "kill -HUP 1". The getty has to be running on the machine that you're going to connect *to*. > The connection is ordinary serial cable, do you mean that should specify > from BSD side what kind of connection is it? > > >Make sure that you haven't got a getty running at the same time on > >both sides, and that you've got a null-modem connection between the two > >hosts instead of a straight thru'. > > Serial cables come in 2 basic flavours: straight thru' and null-modem. A straight-thru is what you use if you want to connect the machine to a modem. A null-modem connection is what you use if you want to connect from host to host. If you use the wrong cable, no output will show, and you may possibly get a device-busy message as well. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- When you don't know what you are doing, do it neatly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 07:59:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B503616A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 07:59:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0ED843D4C for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 07:59:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DJoKW-0003RD-L0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:55:04 +0200 Received: from ns.ag.dn.ua ([213.130.22.147]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:55:04 +0200 Received: from arcade by ns.ag.dn.ua with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:55:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Volodymyr Kostyrko Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:57:23 +0300 Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <20050408035743.84858.qmail@web53302.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ns.ag.dn.ua User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; uk-UA; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050327 In-Reply-To: <20050408035743.84858.qmail@web53302.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: setting an alias in .cshrc with parentheses in it ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 07:59:45 -0000 Joe Schmoe wrote: > I often run this command: > > lynx -useragent "blah blah (compatible; MSIE blah > blah)" > > Note that the custom referrer string that I set > includes parentheses. > > So, to save time, I added this line to my .cshrc: > > alias lynx lynx -useragent "blah blah (compatible; > MSIE blah blah)" > > However, when I run lynx, I get this error: > > Badly placed ()'s > > If I escape the parentheses with a backslash in > ..cshrc, it also doesn't work - it splits the line up > and lynx thinks that the next command line argument > begins where the first backslash is inserted. > > So how do I include a command alias that contains > parentheses into .cshrc ? > > thanks. alias lynx 'lynx -useragent "blah blah (compatible; MSIE blah blah)"' -- [WBR], Arcade. [SAT Astronomy/Think to survive!] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 08:03:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504AC16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:03:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FCE43D41 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:03:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DJoPN-0004MB-D0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:00:05 +0200 Received: from ns.ag.dn.ua ([213.130.22.147]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:00:05 +0200 Received: from arcade by ns.ag.dn.ua with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:00:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Volodymyr Kostyrko Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:59:13 +0300 Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <810a540e050407212817eb7cee@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ns.ag.dn.ua User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; uk-UA; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050327 In-Reply-To: <810a540e050407212817eb7cee@mail.gmail.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: Can't control PostgreSQL with RC scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:03:33 -0000 Pat Maddox wrote: > I installed PostgreSQL 8.0.1 from ports, and now I'd like to control > it with the RC scripts. I wasn't able to run initdb with the scripts, > I had to do that manually with the regular initdb command. Now I've > got the db dir as /usr/local/pgsql/data, which is what it looks like > pgsql expects, but the scripts still won't start it or stop it. They > don't produce any output either. Any ideas on what to do? echo 'postgresql_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf -- [WBR], Arcade. [SAT Astronomy/Think to survive!] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 08:04:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD1516A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:04:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wizard.online.ee (wizard.online.ee [194.106.96.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBB9743D45 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:04:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jani@soundflows.com) Received: (qmail 20065 invoked by uid 79); 8 Apr 2005 11:04:32 +0300 Received: from 194.106.123.34 by wizard (envelope-from , uid 78) with qmail-scanner-1.24st (clamdscan: 0.81/704. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24st. Clear:RC:0(194.106.123.34):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.266177 secs); 08 Apr 2005 11:04:32 +2000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?194.106.123.34?) (194.106.123.34) by wizard.online.ee with SMTP; 8 Apr 2005 11:04:32 +0300 Message-ID: <42563AAC.9060203@soundflows.com> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:02:52 +0300 From: Jani Luukkanen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Chen References: <4254EE05.8000302@soundflows.com> <20050407192714.GA3678@osiris.chen.org.nz> <4256298D.7080704@soundflows.com> <20050408074457.GA5989@osiris.chen.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <20050408074457.GA5989@osiris.chen.org.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serial console connection problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:04:35 -0000 Jonathan Chen wrote: >On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:49:49AM +0300, Jani Luukkanen wrote: > >[...] > > >>Weird, fstat shows nothing on the port; >> >>root@mos root # fstat /dev/cuaa0 >>USER CMD PID FD MOUNT INUM MODE SZ|DV R/W NAME >>root@mos root # >> >>And yes, this is problem is on the 4.10 machine which is connecting to >>the 5.3 one. >> >> >> >[...] > > >>Might be this is the problem, here is all gettys running on the 4.10 >>machine: >> >> > >[...] > > >>root 238 0.0 0.1 956 516 d0 Is 16Mar05 0:00.00 >>/usr/libexec/getty std.9600 console >> >>The last one (console) does not appear on the 5.3 machines processlist, >>would it be safe to kill that one just like that with kill -9 238 (If >>that is the process locking the port)? >> >> Ok, I presume would have to disable the "Serial terminals" section with entries such as; ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" ansi off secure ? The fact that the 5.3 box bios has the built-in serial terminal feature enabled doesnt affect to this one? In sense that it should enable the possibility to even make bios changes or install OS wherever text mode is available. (Main idea of the thing is to ensure availability of the other machine) >You have to do a bit more than this. First you have to disable the >getty on the 4.10 machine by editing /etc/ttys, and then "kill -HUP 1" >and then kill the getty if it still exists. > >You then have to enable the getty on the the 5.3 box by editing >/etc/ttys and then "kill -HUP 1". > >The getty has to be running on the machine that you're going to >connect *to*. > > > >>The connection is ordinary serial cable, do you mean that should specify >>from BSD side what kind of connection is it? >> >> >> >>>Make sure that you haven't got a getty running at the same time on >>>both sides, and that you've got a null-modem connection between the two >>>hosts instead of a straight thru'. >>> >>> >>> > > > Hmm, before upgrading to 5.3 the connection worked with the same cable (though tested only with minicom which also now says Device busy), so I still suspect it might be still some OS-side thing. >Serial cables come in 2 basic flavours: straight thru' and null-modem. >A straight-thru is what you use if you want to connect the machine to >a modem. A null-modem connection is what you use if you want to >connect from host to host. If you use the wrong cable, no output will >show, and you may possibly get a device-busy message as well. > >Cheers. > > Thanks again, Jani From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 08:07:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411C716A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:07:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxfep02.bredband.com (mxfep02.bredband.com [195.54.107.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91FF43D3F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:07:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@wedoweb.se) Received: from [192.168.1.76] ([82.182.69.165] [82.182.69.165]) by mxfep02.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20050408080724.EJBX22685.mxfep02.bredband.com@[192.168.1.76]> for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:07:24 +0200 Message-ID: <42563BB4.4000309@wedoweb.se> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:07:16 +0200 From: Peter Andersson Organization: Wedoweb User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Wlan atheros error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:07:29 -0000 Hi all Just recently bought a Netgear wg311t card hoping to use it in m0n0wall as an AP. The system running m0n0wall (freeBSD based): - via Epia carrying a 800MHz cpu, 128MB ram, 64MB CF-card and an editional 3com 10/100 card. I installed my new netgear card and upgraded to the latest beta-release: 1.2b7 Usign the freeBSD kernel 5.3 I now recive this log during boot: Apr 5 21:57:03 kernel: ath0: mem 0xec000000-0xec00ffff irq 10 at device 19.0 on pci0 Apr 5 21:57:03 kernel: ath0: unable to attach hardware; HAL status 13 Apr 5 21:57:03 kernel: device_attach: ath0 attach returned 6 Anyone got any ideas of what it might be? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 08:32:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF25B16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:32:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D8D43D3F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:32:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-77.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.77]) by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82FD123AC8 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:31:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9BC12B7DF for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:03:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66416-02 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:02:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from alpha (alpha.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497F512B037 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:02:56 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEvDtm5pZw==?= To: Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:03:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcU8DsdNyWl3zRg0TjysV7DABNRKZw== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-Id: <20050408080256.497F512B037@eurystheus.local> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Subject: mounting /tmp with noexec X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:32:42 -0000 Hello, I wonder if it is safe to mount /tmp with noexec flag. I already = discoved that I have to pay attention to this before installing a world, = because this task requires to execute binaries in /tmp. Are there any = further pitfalls which I should take into account or even could keep me = from doing this?=20 Thanks in advance Bj=C3=B6rn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 08:44:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAC416A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:44:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr (postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C6743D31 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:44:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olivier@gautherot.net) Received: from mlagy (mas91-1-82-238-221-116.fbx.proxad.net [82.238.221.116]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8670319295 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:44:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Olivier Gautherot Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:44:46 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504081044.47250.olivier@gautherot.net> Subject: Pb with portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:44:55 -0000 Hi folks! I have a problem with the ports tree: every time I run pkgdb, portversion and some others, the command dies with the following error (don't worry about the stale dependency: I've installed cdrtools-cjk, which is required for the GNOME upgrade... forget it for now). I followed the hints in /usr/ports/UPDATING but no luck. The error message goes: Stale dependency: cdbakeoven-1.8.9_6 -> cdrtools-2.01 (sysutils/cdrtools): cdrdao-1.1.9 (score:20%) ? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [no] /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd5/readline.so: /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd5/readline.so: Undefined symbol "rl_completer_quote_characters" - /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd5/readline.so (LoadError) from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools.rb:364:in `choose_from_options' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools.rb:363:in `loop' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools.rb:363:in `choose_from_options' from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:985:in `input_pkg' from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:803:in `query_dep_fix' from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:580:in `fix_dependencies' from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:564:in `each' from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:564:in `fix_dependencies' from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:339:in `fix_db_phase1' from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:335:in `each' from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:335:in `fix_db_phase1' from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:285:in `fix_db' from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:231:in `main' from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:64:in `initialize' from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:64:in `new' from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:64:in `main' from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:1043 bash-2.05b$ For some reason, ruby18 seems to have an issue with a faulty library. Any clue of how to fix it? Please copy me on answers as I'm not subscribed to the list. Thanks in advance -- Olivier Gautherot olivier@gautherot.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 09:00:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113AA16A4CE; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:00:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postino-2.etat.lu (postino-2.etat.lu [194.154.205.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACAB43D49; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:00:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu) Received: from avirus-2.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-2.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.7]) by postino-2.etat.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1E2109F9D8; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:00:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from avirus-2.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-2.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.7]) by localhost (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 2) with ESMTP id 7F6B2356AD; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:00:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by dispatch-2.cie.etat.lu (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 2) with ESMTP id 5D478356AC; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:00:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEM000C1EC73LF0@store.etat.lu>; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:00:14 +0200 (MEST) Received: from LUCY ([148.110.43.189]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEM00MURECALT10@store.etat.lu>; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:00:13 +0200 (MEST) Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:00:14 +0200 From: Didier Wiroth In-reply-to: <1112881571.662.39.camel@spirit> To: 'Xin LI' Message-id: <0IEM00MUVECCLT10@store.etat.lu> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcU7eEKib/Z34KMUTdOms4ELUtSUOwAndDtw cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: delphij@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:00:27 -0000 Hello, Thx for the patch, I tried it and here is my feedback. To clear out things I'm not using CURRENT, I used: a) FreeBSD5.4-prerelease (as I'm using RELENG_5), running on a HP NC6000 laptop, connected to a docking station with a Microsoft USB mouse b) I downloaded the current rc.d/moused version 1.9 and patched the file with your patch c) copied the current-patched file 1) Unfortunately the problem still exists, error messages still appear. 2) The touchpad worked but my usb mouse didn't work at all >I don't have a patch that is good enough to warrant a commit at present. >You may want to try the patch attached, but I can not promise that it will work for every case. >Thanks for your testing! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 09:23:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C740816A4CE; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:23:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postino-2.etat.lu (postino-2.etat.lu [194.154.205.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5155743D39; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:23:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu) Received: from avirus-1.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.6]) by postino-2.etat.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6532D111504B; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:23:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from avirus-1.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.6]) by localhost (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 1) with ESMTP id 4E2B821592; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:23:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 1) with ESMTP id 35CFC21318; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:23:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEM00069FEH3LG0@store.etat.lu>; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:23:05 +0200 (MEST) Received: from LUCY ([148.110.43.189]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEM00M1KFEELY30@store.etat.lu>; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:23:05 +0200 (MEST) Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:23:06 +0200 From: Didier Wiroth In-reply-to: To: 'Didier Wiroth' , 'Xin LI' Message-id: <0IEM00M1MFEGLY30@store.etat.lu> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcU7eEKib/Z34KMUTdOms4ELUtSUOwAndDtwAAGUz4A= cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: delphij@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:23:06 -0000 Ok, sorry! I rebooted now to be sure and... the touchpad work and the "usb mouse" does work too! But still error messages. Didier -----Original Message----- From: Didier Wiroth [mailto:didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu] Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 11:00 To: 'Xin LI' Cc: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'; 'freebsd-current@freebsd.org'; 'delphij@freebsd.org' Subject: RE: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT Hello, Thx for the patch, I tried it and here is my feedback. To clear out things I'm not using CURRENT, I used: a) FreeBSD5.4-prerelease (as I'm using RELENG_5), running on a HP NC6000 laptop, connected to a docking station with a Microsoft USB mouse b) I downloaded the current rc.d/moused version 1.9 and patched the file with your patch c) copied the current-patched file 1) Unfortunately the problem still exists, error messages still appear. 2) The touchpad worked but my usb mouse didn't work at all >I don't have a patch that is good enough to warrant a commit at present. >You may want to try the patch attached, but I can not promise that it will work for every case. >Thanks for your testing! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 09:32:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF27D16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:32:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx.mg-proline.si (ns1.mg-proline.si [212.18.51.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0093943D31 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:32:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uros.gruber@sir-mag.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.mg-proline.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F16FF4E43 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:27:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.mg-proline.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tia.mg-proline.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23704-03-2 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:27:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mx.mg-proline.si (Postfix, from userid 125) id 6150EF4AD8; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:26:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.mg-proline.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0208F4E65 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:23:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.mg-proline.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tia.mg-proline.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10640-04 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:23:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mx.mg-proline.si (Postfix, from userid 125) id 4FC40F4E05; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:22:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.mg-proline.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C24F4E63 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:35:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.mg-proline.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tia.mg-proline.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03554-06-2 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:35:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.250] (BSN-77-156-117.dsl.siol.net [193.77.156.117]) by mx.mg-proline.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8427AF4E3E for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:35:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42516000.90108@sir-mag.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:40:48 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VXJvxaEgR3J1YmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mg-proline.si X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mg-proline.si X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mg-proline.si Subject: gvinum - gmirror X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:32:04 -0000 Hi! I have one server 5.3RC2 and it's on Gvinum RAID1. Is it safe to upgrade to 5.4 (is there any big work since then). And one thing. Is it possible to move from gvinum to gmirror on live working server (production). I can do this only by remote. tia Uros From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 09:34:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1697016A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:34:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 093CA43D31 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:34:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from free.bsd@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Apr 2005 09:34:27 -0000 Received: from pD9E7EEE8.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.2.101]) [217.231.238.232] by mail.gmx.net (mp006) with SMTP; 08 Apr 2005 11:34:27 +0200 X-Authenticated: #20105305 Message-ID: <425652EC.2000300@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:46:20 +0800 From: FreeBSD Daemon User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: ath(4) sysctl tuneables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:34:30 -0000 dear list, I own a ath(4) card and would be interested in information about the the meaning of these ath sysctl tueables. Which can be changed? Which values can these changeable tuneables take? hw.ath.hal.dma_brt: 2 hw.ath.hal.sw_brt: 10 hw.ath.hal.swba_backoff: 0 hw.ath.dwell: 200 hw.ath.calibrate: 30 hw.ath.outdoor: 1 hw.ath.countrycode: 0 hw.ath.regdomain: 0 hw.ath.debug: 0 hw.ath.dump: If hw.ath.debug is set then here do the debug messages go? TIA zheyu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 09:44:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2412A16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:44:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout-tlr.thomson.com (mailout-tlr.thomson.com [163.231.12.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D74643D39 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:44:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Gerard.Moloney@thomson.com) Received: from mailout-tlr.thomson.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j389i0gG012794 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:44:00 GMT Received: from tlrusmneagfe03.ERF.THOMSON.COM (tlrusmneagfe03.erf.thomson.com [163.231.22.177])j389i0ZN012791 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:44:00 GMT Received: from TLRUKSCMBX01.ERF.THOMSON.COM ([10.223.115.129]) by tlrusmneagfe03.ERF.THOMSON.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 04:45:02 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:45:00 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Re:backups Thread-Index: AcU8H3wwbvewW4RcQv6Gh8A5etBfWQ== From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Apr 2005 09:45:02.0629 (UTC) FILETIME=[A3005D50:01C53C1F] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re:backups X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:44:02 -0000 Hi: =20 I am looking for the correct backup procedure for my pc. =20 kern.flp and mfsroot.flp: these two floppies I created on install as my cdrom cannot install from the cds. Are these in effect boot floppies should my system crash? =20 What media should I backup to? Tape using dump? =20 With these two floppies and the backup ought I be able to restore my system? =20 Cheers Ged. =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 09:45:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976D716A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:45:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C51543D3F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:45:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D59C45641C; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:45:42 +1200 (NZST) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:45:42 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: Jani Luukkanen Message-ID: <20050408094542.GA6528@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <4254EE05.8000302@soundflows.com> <20050407192714.GA3678@osiris.chen.org.nz> <4256298D.7080704@soundflows.com> <20050408074457.GA5989@osiris.chen.org.nz> <42563AAC.9060203@soundflows.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42563AAC.9060203@soundflows.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serial console connection problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:45:45 -0000 On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 11:02:52AM +0300, Jani Luukkanen wrote: [...] > Ok, I presume would have to disable the "Serial terminals" section with > entries such as; > ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" ansi off secure ? Yes. You need to make sure that the 4th column says "off" on the 4.10 machine; and make sure that they say "yes" on the 5.3 machine that you're connecting to. Make sure you do a "kill -HUP 1" on both boxes so that the system rescans /etc/ttys. > The fact that the 5.3 box bios has the built-in serial terminal feature > enabled doesnt affect to this one? > In sense that it should enable the possibility to even make bios changes > or install OS wherever text mode is available. (Main idea of the thing > is to ensure availability of the other machine) I'm not sure what you're saying here. Most machines come with serial-ports; so yes, you can enable them to accept gettys so that you can access them remotely by using a serial cable. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by" - Douglas Adams From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 09:47:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E798116A4DE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:47:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8906243D45 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:47:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D5EB15641C; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:47:23 +1200 (NZST) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:47:23 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen Message-ID: <20050408094723.GB6528@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <4254EE05.8000302@soundflows.com> <20050407192714.GA3678@osiris.chen.org.nz> <4256298D.7080704@soundflows.com> <20050408074457.GA5989@osiris.chen.org.nz> <42563AAC.9060203@soundflows.com> <20050408094542.GA6528@osiris.chen.org.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050408094542.GA6528@osiris.chen.org.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Jani Luukkanen cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serial console connection problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:47:27 -0000 On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:45:42PM +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 11:02:52AM +0300, Jani Luukkanen wrote: > > [...] > > Ok, I presume would have to disable the "Serial terminals" section with > > entries such as; > > ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" ansi off secure ? > > Yes. You need to make sure that the 4th column says "off" on the 4.10 > machine; and make sure that they say "yes" on the 5.3 machine that Sigh. That should read "on" on the 5.3 machine... -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 10:27:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB3B16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:27:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wizard.online.ee (wizard.online.ee [194.106.96.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2986C43D5E for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:27:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jani@soundflows.com) Received: (qmail 7874 invoked by uid 79); 8 Apr 2005 13:27:38 +0300 Received: from 194.106.123.34 by wizard (envelope-from , uid 78) with qmail-scanner-1.24st (clamdscan: 0.81/704. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24st. Clear:RC:0(194.106.123.34):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.21806 secs); 08 Apr 2005 13:27:38 +2000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?194.106.123.34?) (194.106.123.34) by wizard.online.ee with SMTP; 8 Apr 2005 13:27:38 +0300 Message-ID: <42565C3A.2000407@soundflows.com> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:26:02 +0300 From: Jani Luukkanen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Chen References: <4254EE05.8000302@soundflows.com> <20050407192714.GA3678@osiris.chen.org.nz> <4256298D.7080704@soundflows.com> <20050408074457.GA5989@osiris.chen.org.nz> <42563AAC.9060203@soundflows.com> <20050408094542.GA6528@osiris.chen.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <20050408094542.GA6528@osiris.chen.org.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serial console connection problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:27:41 -0000 Jonathan Chen wrote: >On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 11:02:52AM +0300, Jani Luukkanen wrote: > >[...] > > >>Ok, I presume would have to disable the "Serial terminals" section with >>entries such as; >>ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" ansi off secure ? >> >> > >Yes. You need to make sure that the 4th column says "off" on the 4.10 >machine; and make sure that they say "yes" on the 5.3 machine that >you're connecting to. Make sure you do a "kill -HUP 1" on both boxes >so that the system rescans /etc/ttys. > > > Ok, will try that, thanks. Although the host machine should be able to accept connections without anything enabled from the OS side. >>The fact that the 5.3 box bios has the built-in serial terminal feature >>enabled doesnt affect to this one? >>In sense that it should enable the possibility to even make bios changes >>or install OS wherever text mode is available. (Main idea of the thing >>is to ensure availability of the other machine) >> >> > > > Sorry for confusing explanation. The board has built in serial console feature, which you can turn on from bios. This allows you to access the machine through serial port no matter in what condition the machine would be. (Hanging in the boot-phase or kernel dead) Option has been set up so that the serial console replaces one of the comports. (In this case it would be replacing Com1 in the 5.3 machine) 4.10 is of course configured with ordinary serial ports so that it would have access to the serial terminal of the other machine. Might be this is irrelevant but just wondering does BSD need in that case some special conf for this purpose or just needs replacing the getty settings. (Previously with 4.10 configuration i managed to connect through minicom) >I'm not sure what you're saying here. Most machines come with >serial-ports; so yes, you can enable them to accept gettys so that you >can access them remotely by using a serial cable. > >Cheers. > > Thanks, Jani From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 10:33:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6283416A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:33:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BE143D5C for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:33:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j38AXBb0021423; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:33:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id j38AXB83021422; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:33:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200504081033.j38AXB83021422@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: Gerard.Moloney@thomson.com Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:33:11 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: backups X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:33:12 -0000 > > Hi: > > I am looking for the correct backup procedure for my pc. > > kern.flp and mfsroot.flp: these two floppies I created on install as my > cdrom cannot install from the cds. > Are these in effect boot floppies should my system crash? Sort of. They are installation boot floppies. But, they are not a full rescue system as far as I know. > What media should I backup to? Tape using dump? If you have that. Alternatively, if you have a spare disk that is big enough and not used for anything else, you could use dump to back up to that. But, tape is still quite common - maybe most common. > > With these two floppies and the backup ought I be able to restore my > system? Yes. But, it is a bit more complicated than that. You would build enough of the system by doing an install with them and then restoring the dump over it, using it. I don't know if there is any rescue floppy now. ////jerry > > Cheers Ged. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 10:38:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E2F16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:38:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0743143D46 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:38:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 27F675641C; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:38:53 +1200 (NZST) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:38:53 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: Jani Luukkanen Message-ID: <20050408103853.GA6841@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <4254EE05.8000302@soundflows.com> <20050407192714.GA3678@osiris.chen.org.nz> <4256298D.7080704@soundflows.com> <20050408074457.GA5989@osiris.chen.org.nz> <42563AAC.9060203@soundflows.com> <20050408094542.GA6528@osiris.chen.org.nz> <42565C3A.2000407@soundflows.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42565C3A.2000407@soundflows.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serial console connection problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:38:55 -0000 On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:26:02PM +0300, Jani Luukkanen wrote: [...] > Sorry for confusing explanation. The board has built in serial console > feature, which you can turn on from bios. This allows you to access the > machine through serial port no matter in what condition the machine > would be. (Hanging in the boot-phase or kernel dead) > > Option has been set up so that the serial console replaces one of the > comports. (In this case it would be replacing Com1 in the 5.3 machine) > 4.10 is of course configured with ordinary serial ports so that it would > have access to the serial terminal of the other machine. > > Might be this is irrelevant but just wondering does BSD need in that > case some special conf for this purpose or just needs replacing the > getty settings. (Previously with 4.10 configuration i managed to connect > through minicom) Hmm. This is a different case altogether. I suspect that the 5.3 kernel is intefering with your BIOS console. You may have to disble the kernel from recognising the port altogether so that it doesn't get in the way. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jesus saves. Allah forgives. Cthulu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 10:55:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F49B16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:55:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from engraver.valleygate.net (12-240-1-161.client.mchsi.com [12.240.1.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9693C43D1D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:55:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wizlayer@gmail.com) Received: from wizard.valleygate.net (wizard.valleygate.net [10.51.10.3]) j38AtYDI002957; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:55:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wizlayer@gmail.com) From: wizlayer To: John Meing Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:55:31 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <4f34b68f05040704381700d67e@mail.gmail.com> <200504070805.18085.wizlayer@gmail.com> <4f34b68f050407233115bd3f27@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4f34b68f050407233115bd3f27@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504080655.32758.wizlayer@gmail.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: install.cfg (was RE: & No Subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: wizlayer@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:55:36 -0000 On Friday 08 April 2005 02:31 am, John Meing wrote: > Mike I also tried to use only following line in install.cfg > (without the rc.conf lines) > > command="passwd root" system > > which should not has mismatching quote errors (and I tested > with /stand/sysinstalld and it worked) but it didn't work when > i put it in install.cfg :(( > > John Meing > [snip] > > Okay, but that still doesn't work for the syntax... Going > > back to > > > > your original post: > > > command="echo sendmail_enable="NONE" >> /etc/rc.conf" > > > system > > > > would at best cause mismatching quote errors (which is what > > I'm assuming you're getting?) > > > > Mike hmmm... I googled this list and found the following link (which may wrap in email): http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-January/031620.html I'm thinking perhaps this function through sysinstall isn't completely implemented yet.... or.... I've just noticed there's no mention of a shell (hmmmm)... Maybe something like: # /stand/sysinstall command="sh passwd root" system Even though it doesn't seem to work from the command line, I wonder if the problem isn't something along these lines? Perhaps putting these commands into a script and then having install.cfg run the script instead would clear it up. (I'm shooting in the dark here, I know... But now I'm curious...) Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 11:10:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6377C16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:10:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC9F43D2D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:10:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from attackers@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 1so502738rny for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 04:10:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=WXEoCzsEkzkI9LSK+ne0UAqDYAYAPZV3toWc5GmBnZMaa7r/MccQVbIsdefuwXRMug9q7aKHCalD3SnfeDUseIe0gagd/pOHno3ZJ5yePeXCYtM456g4eqSkjWYV54jJuAlsHgK9CoUihfjM1R5IDlTGM8h+OiEmUtdKYtTKD1k= Received: by 10.38.2.80 with SMTP id 80mr1170593rnb; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 04:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.44 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 04:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4f34b68f0504080410283a7d01@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:10:34 +0700 From: John Meing To: wizlayer@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200504080655.32758.wizlayer@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4f34b68f05040704381700d67e@mail.gmail.com> <200504070805.18085.wizlayer@gmail.com> <4f34b68f050407233115bd3f27@mail.gmail.com> <200504080655.32758.wizlayer@gmail.com> Subject: Re: install.cfg (was RE: & No Subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Meing List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:10:35 -0000 Mike, Thanks alot for your suggestion, I'll try to put these lines to a shell script and try to make install.cfg run them. I'll post results soon. John Meing On Apr 8, 2005 5:55 PM, wizlayer wrote: > On Friday 08 April 2005 02:31 am, John Meing wrote: > > Mike I also tried to use only following line in install.cfg > > (without the rc.conf lines) > > > > command="passwd root" system > > > > which should not has mismatching quote errors (and I tested > > with /stand/sysinstalld and it worked) but it didn't work when > > i put it in install.cfg :(( > > > > John Meing > > > [snip] > > > Okay, but that still doesn't work for the syntax... Going > > > back to > > > > > > your original post: > > > > command="echo sendmail_enable="NONE" >> /etc/rc.conf" > > > > system > > > > > > would at best cause mismatching quote errors (which is what > > > I'm assuming you're getting?) > > > > > > Mike > > hmmm... I googled this list and found the following link (which > may wrap in email): > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-January/031620.html > > I'm thinking perhaps this function through sysinstall isn't > completely implemented yet.... or.... I've just noticed there's > no mention of a shell (hmmmm)... > > Maybe something like: > > # /stand/sysinstall command="sh passwd root" system > > Even though it doesn't seem to work from the command line, I > wonder if the problem isn't something along these lines? Perhaps > putting these commands into a script and then having install.cfg > run the script instead would clear it up. > > (I'm shooting in the dark here, I know... But now I'm curious...) > > Mike > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 12:14:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3433616A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:14:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 221DA43D49 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:14:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Apr 2005 12:14:19 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de) [62.245.232.135] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 08 Apr 2005 14:14:19 +0200 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:13:59 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 X-Birthday: 10/06/72 X-CelPhone: +49 173 9967781 X-Tel: +49 89 18947781 X-Country: Germany X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-OS: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1206348.Os4LcikPBT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504081414.09168@harrymail> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: no (t)csh read builtin? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:14:21 -0000 --nextPart1206348.Os4LcikPBT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello, how can I interactively read a variable from the command line with tcsh? The *[^c]sh command "read" doesn't exist, so how can I do it with csh? Thanks, -Harry --nextPart1206348.Os4LcikPBT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCVnWRBylq0S4AzzwRAkiGAKCCi0Y2CeFiVafEFFNqUpVJ1hSgjgCfePTN e4vXRDEpwdwCas+83pmdm3c= =vwsc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1206348.Os4LcikPBT-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 12:16:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CAD16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:16:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6928443D2F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:16:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gjbailey@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so826581wra for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 05:16:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JvuPU+dbGZEKiLn1dEZ2ZlSUbyWF1Bu30kzgcbDqW98BV5k9EuKUmXLxeSncRKYAde6JTsUgcbp3hYporKVsV7aRsJpv4Yepbgs9P1jukgzrAHyb0glrbHGxgBiglU2iQXq5jwqvNq0WqkPWOB1ve6qPd3XStQ6TZu2VHql1GlA= Received: by 10.54.50.73 with SMTP id x73mr56552wrx; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 05:16:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.83.20 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 05:16:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48a5f32a05040805163282ec0a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:16:15 +0200 From: Gareth Bailey To: freebsd-questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: IPF Firewall Rules... help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gareth Bailey List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:16:16 -0000 We have a freebsd gateway server for windows clients. We use IPF with nat. What ipf rules and ipnat rules are required on the gateway for Limewire peer-to-peer to connect on the clients. If you can help, please do... i'm doing something wrong! Thanks Gareth From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 12:41:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC3916A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:41:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prosporo.hedron.org (hedron.org [66.11.182.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D648843D4C for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:41:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ean@hedron.org) Received: from www.hedron.org (localhost.hedron.org [127.0.0.1]) by prosporo.hedron.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643F6C104; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:41:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 216.220.59.169 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ean); by www.hedron.org with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:41:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1803.216.220.59.169.1112964074.squirrel@216.220.59.169> In-Reply-To: <20050408080256.497F512B037@eurystheus.local> References: <20050408080256.497F512B037@eurystheus.local> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:41:14 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ean Kingston" To: Bjö@example.com, "rn" , "nig" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mounting /tmp with noexec X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:41:14 -0000 > Hello, > > I wonder if it is safe to mount /tmp with noexec flag. I already discoved > that I have to pay attention to this before installing a world, because > this task requires to execute binaries in /tmp. Are there any further > pitfalls which I should take into account or even could keep me from doing > this? I haven't seen a reply to your query so let me say that I have mounted /tmp noexec for years and the only problems I've had were the installworld problem you mentioned and a few badly written 3rd party installers that expect to be able to execute from /tmp. I also mount /tmp nosuexec and async. Sometimes after a system crash I have to rebuild /tmp because of the async but the systems just don't crash that often. -- Ean Kingston E-Mail: ean_AT_hedron_DOT_org PGP KeyID: 1024D/CBC5D6BB URL: http://www.hedron.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 12:51:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262BF16A4CE; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:51:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B4E43D1D; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:51:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from delphij@frontfree.net) Received: from beastie.frontfree.net (unknown [219.239.99.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CC7EB0D39; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:51:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost.frontfree.net [127.0.0.1]) by beastie.frontfree.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4721D133220; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:51:17 +0800 (CST) Received: from beastie.frontfree.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (beastie.frontfree.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55148-10; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:51:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [61.135.152.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by beastie.frontfree.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD55E13312B; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:50:59 +0800 (CST) From: Xin LI To: Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: <4255A836.3060708@elischer.org> References: <99f113a61084.4252ff36@etat.lu> <4255A836.3060708@elischer.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Jeth66KKhOhFncJB1df+" Organization: The FreeBSD Simplified Chinese Project Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:50:46 +0800 Message-Id: <1112964646.665.4.camel@spirit> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at frontfree.net cc: Didier Wiroth cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Travis Poppe cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vesa 1024x768 mode in future version? to the freebsd community X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: delphij@delphij.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:51:27 -0000 --=-Jeth66KKhOhFncJB1df+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =E5=9C=A8 2005-04-07=E5=9B=9B=E7=9A=84 14:37 -0700=EF=BC=8CJulian Elischer= =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > point me at the patches again? http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/vesa The patchset is ported from DragonFlyBSD. It still have some issues at this time so I did not committed it yet. (Currently I am lack of time to investigate the problem so if someone else can fix the issue I will be happy to see them picking up this one). Cheers, --=20 Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ --=-Jeth66KKhOhFncJB1df+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCVn4m/cVsHxFZiIoRAhNTAJ97GfQsOyPjcRHmRy7eiTn5RhK6IACeJBHh FTDUd5Ro6cnza2Rk5rXA/4E= =oKUV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Jeth66KKhOhFncJB1df+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 13:18:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69B016A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:18:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE0743D2F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:18:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:9997 helo=mail.aseed.antenna.nl) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJtNQ-000Ojx-JN for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:18:24 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by mail.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F47154924 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:19:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (f80052.upc-f.chello.nl [80.56.80.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7DA58CB6B for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:18:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:18:25 +0200 From: "albi@scii.nl" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050408151825.21604186.albi@scii.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: restricting "fat jails" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:18:26 -0000 i was wondering exactly which files in /dev/ can be removed in a jail ? and i thought of a dirty approach of restricting building a jail by removed the parts in /usr/obj/ that you don't want, but i bet that make installworld is gonna complain about, is there a way around ? (perhaps something else than make -i installworld) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 13:26:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D15616A500 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:26:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A4943D5A for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:26:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gjbailey@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so841392wra for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:26:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=HDXSvmoBoj837N9EK+ncHuM4RtA4lxvwixJWMa6g+V0I2JkuXCjpkVqlPUbtTYytiMwawk6JUxhFKZLRRRz+qClhK55QezqUuYteGur3oTS9wLLg8jhjy3V7sSu/uzlOHcaqR1jx5x+y3U29ZvzyLRVd/plhdAB0ygAPpDgKOjc= Received: by 10.54.10.59 with SMTP id 59mr647255wrj; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.83.20 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48a5f32a0504080626383f5441@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:26:11 +0200 From: Gareth Bailey To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <48a5f32a05040806253f07f2e9@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_33145_16289997.1112966771283" References: <48a5f32a05040805163282ec0a@mail.gmail.com> <48a5f32a05040806253f07f2e9@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: IPF Firewall Rules... help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gareth Bailey List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:26:13 -0000 ------=_Part_33145_16289997.1112966771283 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Bob, Thanks, I have read the handbook and a couple of other articles. I have attached my ipf and ipnat rule lists. Please advise on the commented out Bit torrent sections. The windows clients want to run Limewire. WRT the LAN environment, we have a couple of Windows XP SP2 clients, and the freeBSD gateway. The external connection from the gateway runs upstairs into the block's router, which is connected to an ADSL router (no static IP). Thanks for your help! Gareth On Apr 8, 2005 2:51 PM, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > Read the official FreeBSD handbook firewall section. It has working > examples. Any more help can only be offered if you post your rules > and give details of your LAN environment. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gareth > Bailey > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 8:16 AM > To: freebsd-questions > Subject: IPF Firewall Rules... help! > > We have a freebsd gateway server for windows clients. We use IPF > with nat. > > What ipf rules and ipnat rules are required on the gateway for > Limewire peer-to-peer to connect on the clients. > > If you can help, please do... i'm doing something wrong! > > Thanks > Gareth > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > ------=_Part_33145_16289997.1112966771283 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=ipf.rules Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ipf.rules" ################################################################# # No restrictions on Inside Lan Interface for private network # Not needed unless you have Lan ################################################################# pass out quick on xl0 all pass in quick on xl0 all ################################################################# # No restrictions on Loopback Interface ################################################################# pass in quick on lo0 all pass out quick on lo0 all ################################################################# # Bit-torrent section ################################################################# #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port 6300 >< 7000 #pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port 6300 >< 7000 #pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 6346 flags S/SAFR keep state ################################################################# # Interface facing Public internet (Outbound Section) # Interrogate session start requests originating from behind the # firewall on the private network # or from this gateway server destine for the public internet. ################################################################# # FTI DSL name servers pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to 196.41.0.10 port = 53 flags S keep state pass out quick on rl0 proto udp from any to 196.41.0.10 port = 53 keep state pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to 196.41.0.11 port = 53 flags S keep state pass out quick on rl0 proto udp from any to 196.41.0.11 port = 53 keep state # Allow out non-secure standard www function pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 80 flags S keep state # Allow out secure www function https over TLS SSL pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 443 flags S keep state # Allow out send & get email function pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 110 flags S keep state pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 25 flags S keep state # LAN FTP pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 21 flags S keep state # Allow out secure FTP, Telnet, and SCP # This function is using SSH (secure shell) pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 22 flags S keep state # Allow out FBSD CVSUP function pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 5999 flags S keep state # Allow out ping to public Internet pass out quick on rl0 proto icmp from any to any icmp-type 8 keep state # Allow out whois for LAN PC to public Internet pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 43 flags S keep state # Allow out ftp between ports 3500 and 3600 (Courtesy) pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port 3500 <> 3600 flags S keep state # Block and log only the first occurrence of everything # else that.s trying to get out. # This rule enforces the block all by default logic. block out log first quick on rl0 all ################################################################# # Interface facing Public internet (Inbound Section) # Interrogate packets originating from the public internet # destine for this gateway server or the private network. ################################################################# # Block all inbound traffic from non-routable or reserved address spaces block in quick on rl0 from 192.168.0.0/16 to any #RFC 1918 private IP block in quick on rl0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any #RFC 1918 private IP block in quick on rl0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any #RFC 1918 private IP block in quick on rl0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any #loopback block in quick on rl0 from 0.0.0.0/8 to any #loopback block in quick on rl0 from 169.254.0.0/16 to any #DHCP auto-config block in quick on rl0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any #reserved for doc's block in quick on rl0 from 204.152.64.0/23 to any #Sun cluster interconnect block in quick on rl0 from 224.0.0.0/3 to any #Class D & E multicast ##### Block a bunch of different nasty things. ############ # That I don.t want to see in the log # Block frags block in quick on rl0 all with frags # Block short tcp packets block in quick on rl0 proto tcp all with short # block source routed packets block in quick on rl0 all with opt lsrr block in quick on rl0 all with opt ssrr # Block nmap OS fingerprint attempts # Log first occurrence of these so I can get their IP address block in log first quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any flags FUP # Block anything with special options block in quick on rl0 all with ipopts # Block public pings block in quick on rl0 proto icmp all icmp-type 8 # Block ident block in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 113 # Block all Netbios service. 137=name, 138=datagram, 139=session # Netbios is MS/Windows sharing services. # Block MS/Windows hosts2 name server requests 81 block in log first quick on rl0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 137 block in log first quick on rl0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 138 block in log first quick on rl0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 139 block in log first quick on rl0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 81 # Allow traffic in from ISP's DHCP server. This rule must contain # the IP address of your ISP.s DHCP server as it.s the only # authorized source to send this packet type. Only necessary for # cable or DSL configurations. This rule is not needed for # .user ppp. type connection to the public internet. # This is the same IP address you captured and # used in the outbound section. #pass in log quick on rl0 proto udp from 192.168.150.5 to any port = 67 keep state #pass in log quick on rl0 proto udp from 192.168.150.5 to any port = 68 keep state # Block and log only first occurrence of all remaining traffic # coming into the firewall. The logging of only the first # occurrence stops an .denial of service. attack targeted # at filling up your log file space. # This rule enforces the block all by default logic. block in log first quick on rl0 all ################### End of rules file ##################################### ------=_Part_33145_16289997.1112966771283 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=ipnat.rules Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ipnat.rules" # # Interface: # rl0 - external to DHCP server # # NAT policy: # + Use IP Filter FTP proxy # + Use IP Filter IKE proxy # + Use IP Filter RealAudio proxy # + NAT UDP and TCP packets from internal hosts to external IP # + NAT ICMP packets from internal hosts to external IP # # share and enjoy, # hoang@muine.org # Oct 25, 2001 # #bit torrent #rdr rl0 0.0.0/0 port 6881 -> 192.168.0.2,192.168.0.3 port 6881 #rdr rl0 0.0.0/0 port 6882 -> 192.168.0.2,192.168.0.3 port 6882 #rdr rl0 0.0.0/0 port 6883 -> 192.168.0.2,192.168.0.3 port 6883 #rdr rl0 0.0.0/0 port 6884 -> 192.168.0.2,192.168.0.3 port 6884 #rdr rl0 0.0.0/0 port 6885 -> 192.168.0.2,192.168.0.3 port 6885 #rdr rl0 0.0.0/0 port 6886 -> 192.168.0.2,192.168.0.3 port 6886 #rdr rl0 0.0.0/0 port 6887 -> 192.168.0.2,192.168.0.3 port 6887 #rdr rl0 0.0.0/0 port 6888 -> 192.168.0.2,192.168.0.3 port 6888 #rdr rl0 0.0.0/0 port 6889 -> 192.168.0.2,192.168.0.3 port 6889 # ------------------------------------------------------------ # Use ipfilter FTP proxy for the firewall doing transfer mode # active. # ------------------------------------------------------------ map rl0 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp # ------------------------------------------------------------ # Use ipfilter FTP proxy for hosts behind NAT doing transfer # mode active. # ------------------------------------------------------------ map rl0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0.0.0.0/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp # ----------------------------------------------------------- # Use ipfilter IKE proxy for ESP packets for hosts behind NAT # IP Filter 3.4.21 and beyond only. # ----------------------------------------------------------- map rl0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0.0.0.0/32 proxy port 500 ipsec/udp # ----------------------------------------------------------- # Use ipfilter RealAudio proxy for hosts behind NAT # ----------------------------------------------------------- map rl0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0.0.0.0/32 proxy port 7070 raudio/tcp # ----------------------------------------------------------- # Map all internal UDP and TCP traffic to the external IP address # ----------------------------------------------------------- map rl0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0.0.0.0/32 portmap tcp/udp 40000:60000 # ----------------------------------------------------------- # Map all other traffic e.g. ICMP to the external IP address # ----------------------------------------------------------- map rl0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0.0.0.0/32 ------=_Part_33145_16289997.1112966771283-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 13:28:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B33C16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:28:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D4943D53 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:28:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.37.55] ([82.41.37.55]) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:28:38 +0100 Message-ID: <425686E0.9040304@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:28:00 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040627 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Emanuel Strobl References: <200504081414.09168@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <200504081414.09168@harrymail> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Apr 2005 13:28:38.0832 (UTC) FILETIME=[DFAE7B00:01C53C3E] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no (t)csh read builtin? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:28:03 -0000 Emanuel Strobl wrote: >how can I interactively read a variable from the command line with tcsh? >The *[^c]sh command "read" doesn't exist, so how can I do it with csh? > > From man csh: $< Substitutes a line from the standard input, with no further interpretation thereafter. It can be used to read from the keyboard in a shell script. (+) While csh always quotes $<, as if it were equivalent to `$<:q', tcsh does not. Furthermore, when tcsh is waiting for a line to be typed the user may type an interrupt to interrupt the sequence into which the line is to be substituted, but csh does not allow this. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 13:33:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BE716A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:33:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yearning.mcc.ac.uk (yearning.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.203.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781DD43D31 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:33:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by yearning.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1DJtcK-000Biv-86 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:33:48 +0100 Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j38DXl6T002152 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:33:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.13.1/8.12.6/Submit) id j38DXlEA002151 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:33:47 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:33:47 +0100 From: Jonathon McKitrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050408133347.GB1809@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: Common Lisp on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:33:52 -0000 Hi all, I noticed that the clisp port is marked broken, so I have to look at other choices. Does anyone have any thoughts on the other Lisp ports as a good system to learn on and use? jm -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 14:32:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2EC16A4CF for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:32:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu (hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu [132.183.156.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9598B43D48 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:32:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remorse@partners.org) Received: from [132.183.156.105] (buxtehude.mgh.harvard.edu [132.183.156.105]) by hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j38EWk79038265 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:32:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from remorse@partners.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <0C6023A0-A83B-11D9-B765-000A956EB07E@partners.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: questions@freebsd.org From: Richard Morse Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:32:34 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: Any way to log all process launches? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:32:31 -0000 Hi! I'm trying to track down an odd problem, for which it would be very useful to be able to have the computer keep track of every process that gets created -- ie, keep a list of every fork / exec that occurs. Is this possible? Thanks, Ricky Morse From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 14:33:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101EE16A4D5 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:33:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A549943D3F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:33:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 28087 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2005 14:33:00 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Apr 2005 14:33:00 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 605FA53; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:32:59 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: dick@nagual.st References: <20050407120148.1904bcae.dick@nagual.st> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Apr 2005 10:32:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050407120148.1904bcae.dick@nagual.st> Message-ID: <44ekdl8hk5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rtc question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:33:02 -0000 dick hoogendijk writes: > I decided to remove polling and hz=1200 from my kernel. The system was > slower. Things run pretty smooth now (duron-800/512Mb) with the default > HZ=100, /but/ : > > Now vmware3 is complaining about the rtc : timing error, please > increase... > The virtual machine itself runs just fine. If it does no harm I want to > stick to the HZ=100. What does this rtc message mean and what are the > consequenses? An unstable system? Depends what you mean by "unstable". The symptom I would most expect would be the virtual machine seeing some variation in real-time clock rate. In your position, I would try some intermediate values for HZ, and see what happens. In particular, 1000 is the usual recommended value for faster systems, and 200 or 400 might well be okay. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 14:36:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455E516A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:36:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023EE43D5C for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:36:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 32542 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2005 14:36:44 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Apr 2005 14:36:44 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 9B90652; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:36:43 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Andreas Davour References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Apr 2005 10:36:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44aco98hdw.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 31 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ps2pdf and ps2epsi behaving strange X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:36:45 -0000 Andreas Davour writes: > After using these tools, installing the epsmegre port (and some > others) and then removing the latter again, the former have stopped > working! > > bash-2.05b$ ps2pdf elcFront.ps > Unknown device: pdfwrite > bash-2.05b$ ps2epsi elcFront.ps > Unknown device: bit > bash-2.05b$ > > How come those devices they ask for have dissapeared, or why have they > suddenly developed a need for them? > > Oddly enough, ps2epsi seems to produce the correct output, regardless > of the error - ps2pdf not so. > > I have reinstalled ghostscript-gnu, but it didn't solve the problem. > > Are there some port around that messed with them in a way that didn't > showed up untill I pkg_delete'd those ports? Possibly. That would be a bug in whichever port did that, and would be worth fixing, but we'd have to identify the bug first. I think the file in question would be: $ locate pdfwrite /usr/local/share/ghostscript/7.07/lib/pdfwrite.ps $ so check to see if you have it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 14:37:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E153616A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:37:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F5943D41 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:37:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 22207 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2005 14:37:47 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Apr 2005 14:37:47 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3FEC052; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:37:46 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Tarc References: <20050407151755.GA31401@tarc.po.cs.msu.su> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Apr 2005 10:37:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050407151755.GA31401@tarc.po.cs.msu.su> Message-ID: <4464yx8hc5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lost depend? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:37:48 -0000 Tarc writes: > /usr/ports/www/oops> make > ===> oops-1.5.24_1 depends on executable: gawk - found > ===> oops-1.5.24_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf259 - found > ===> oops-1.5.24_1 depends on shared library: gigabase_r.2 - found > ===> Configuring for oops-1.5.24_1 > /usr/local/bin/autoheader259: not found > *** Error code 127 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/oops. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/oops. So do you have /usr/local/bin/autoheader259, or not? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 14:39:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF79F16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:39:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be (apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51C043D1F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:39:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dimitri.bosiers@pandora.be) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 548C938159 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:39:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.123.101] (dD5778BDA.access.telenet.be [213.119.139.218]) by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7584A380C5 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:39:15 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <6ed480a645c343cafe2f8eafac1c44c1@pandora.be> From: Dimitri Bosiers Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:39:14 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Strange Printing Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:39:18 -0000 Hi Leonard did you find a solution for this ---------------------------------------------------------- > Hi, > > I've got a small network with a few Windows XP machines. I'm running > into a > problem where I can can print but others cannot. For me, everything > works > great and as expected. However, for the others, they seem to have > intermittent problems where Samba complains with multiple lines such > as the > following: > > Jul 17 22:02:37 chung smbd[472]: [2003/07/17 22:02:37, 0] > rpc_client/cli_spoolss_notify.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(91) > Jul 17 22:02:37 chung smbd[472]: connect_to_client: unable to > connect to > SMB server on machine ZEUS. Error was : SUCCESS - 0. > > Does anybody have any idea what is going on? The client machines are > all > Windows XP Pro. The printer is being driven by CUPS and the test pages > print > fine from both the CUPS administrative interface and my Windows test > pages > go through fine. The only difference between myself and the other > users on > this unix box is that my account is part of the wheel group. > > Here's my smb.conf file: > > # Samba config file created using SWAT > # from 10.0.1.239 (10.0.1.239) > # Date: 2003/07/16 18:41:23 > > # Global parameters > [global] > netbios name = CAMELLIA > server string = Samba Server > encrypt passwords = Yes > lanman auth = No > printing = cups > printcap name = cups > load printers = yes > > [printers] > comment = All Printers > path = /var/spool/samba > printable = yes > printer admin = root, @printadmins > > Here's my cups printers.conf file: > > # Printer configuration file for CUPS v1.1.18 > # Written by cupsd on Thu Jul 17 01:40:14 2003 > > Info Lexmark E210 on USB > Location SF Home > DeviceURI usb:/dev/ulpt0 > State Idle > Accepting Yes > JobSheets none none > QuotaPeriod 0 > PageLimit 0 > KLimit 0 > > > This is a freebsd 4.8 machine. > > Thanks, > > Leonard ---------------------------------------------------------- I'm trying to set up XP <--> OSX SMB printing and i have the same problem (athough filesharing and domain-control works fine) my log : timeout connecting to 192.168.123.102:139 [2005/04/08 16:09:38, 1] /SourceCache/samba/samba-60.1/samba/source/libsmb/cliconnect.c: cli_connect(1306) Error connecting to 192.168.123.102 (Operation already in progress) [2005/04/08 16:09:38, 0] /SourceCache/samba/samba-60.1/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c: spoolss_connect_to_client(2583) spoolss_connect_to_client: unable to connect to SMB server on machine ALIEN01. Error was : SUCCESS - 0. wich looks quite similar switching the windows firewall on or of does not help. Since OSX is some sort of BSD I thought that what helps you could help me. my config : [global] log level = 1 display charset = UTF-8-MAC print command = /usr/sbin/PrintServiceAccess printps %p %s lprm command = /usr/sbin/PrintServiceAccess remove %p %j security = user guest account = unknown encrypt passwords = yes printing = BSD allow trusted domains = no preferred master = yes lppause command = /usr/sbin/PrintServiceAccess hold %p %j netbios name = phoenix wins support = yes add machine script = /usr/bin/opendirectorypdbconfig -c create_computer_account -r %u -n "/LDAPv3/127.0.0.1" printcap = /private/etc/printcap max smbd processes = 20 server string = Mac OS X lpresume command = /usr/sbin/PrintServiceAccess release %p %j logon drive = H: client ntlmv2 auth = no domain logons = yes lpq command = /usr/sbin/PrintServiceAccess jobs %p admin users = @admin passdb backend = opendirectorysam guest dos charset = CP850 unix charset = UTF-8-MAC auth methods = guest opendirectory local master = yes use spnego = no domain master = yes logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u printer admin = @admin, @staff map to guest = Never defer sharing violations = no workgroup = INTRANET [SP870] public = yes comment = macosx path = /var/spool/samba print ok = yes [Public] comment = macosx inherit permissions = no path = /Shared Items/Public directory mask = 0755 map archive = no guest ok = 1 read only = no create mask = 0644 [homes] browseable = no root preexec = /usr/sbin/inituser %U create mode = 0750 read only = no comment = User Home Directories [profiles] path = /Users/Profiles oplocks = yes strict locking = no read only = no browseable = no [printers] public = no path = /private/tmp browsable = no writable = no use client driver = yes create mode = 0700 printable = yes comment = All Printers [netlogon] path = /etc/netlogon oplocks = yes strict locking = no write list = @admin browseable = no [Groups] comment = macosx inherit permissions = no path = /Groups directory mask = 0755 map archive = no guest ok = 1 read only = no create mask = 0644 [Users] comment = macosx inherit permissions = no path = /Users directory mask = 0755 map archive = no guest ok = 1 read only = no create mask = 0644 > Best Regards, Dimitri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 14:41:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952AF16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:41:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF5643D31 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:41:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j38Ee9ts012326; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:40:09 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j38Ef5tF089817; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:41:05 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j38Ef5HW089807; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:41:05 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:41:05 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Richard Morse Message-ID: <20050408144104.GA75094@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <0C6023A0-A83B-11D9-B765-000A956EB07E@partners.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0C6023A0-A83B-11D9-B765-000A956EB07E@partners.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any way to log all process launches? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:41:09 -0000 On 2005-04-08 10:32, Richard Morse wrote: > Hi! I'm trying to track down an odd problem, for which it would be > very useful to be able to have the computer keep track of every > process that gets created -- ie, keep a list of every fork / exec that > occurs. Is this possible? Yes, it is possible. This is part of what `process accounting' does. Look at the manpages of accton(8), lastcomm(1); then check the accounting_enable knob in rc.conf(5) and /etc/defaults/rc.conf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 14:41:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACA616A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:41:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3186E43D1F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:41:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:10012 helo=mail.aseed.antenna.nl) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJugC-0009Rn-Eo; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:41:52 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by mail.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C7B154924; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:43:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (f80052.upc-f.chello.nl [80.56.80.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F081058CB6B; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:41:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:41:54 +0200 From: "albi@scii.nl" To: Richard Morse Message-Id: <20050408164154.48d9ef51.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <0C6023A0-A83B-11D9-B765-000A956EB07E@partners.org> References: <0C6023A0-A83B-11D9-B765-000A956EB07E@partners.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any way to log all process launches? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:41:53 -0000 On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:32:34 -0400 Richard Morse wrote: > Hi! I'm trying to track down an odd problem, for which it would be > very useful to be able to have the computer keep track of every > process that gets created -- ie, keep a list of every fork / exec > that occurs. Is this possible? take a look at the manpages of accton, sa, and perhaps also lsof see also here : http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security-accounting.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 14:44:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36A516A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:44:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu (hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu [132.183.156.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDFE43D3F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:44:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remorse@partners.org) Received: from [132.183.156.105] (buxtehude.mgh.harvard.edu [132.183.156.105]) j38EiPFc038343; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:44:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from remorse@partners.org) In-Reply-To: <20050408144104.GA75094@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <0C6023A0-A83B-11D9-B765-000A956EB07E@partners.org> <20050408144104.GA75094@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Richard Morse Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:44:14 -0400 To: Giorgos Keramidas X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any way to log all process launches? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:44:32 -0000 On 8 Apr 2005, at 10:41 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-04-08 10:32, Richard Morse wrote: >> Hi! I'm trying to track down an odd problem, for which it would be >> very useful to be able to have the computer keep track of every >> process that gets created -- ie, keep a list of every fork / exec that >> occurs. Is this possible? > > Yes, it is possible. This is part of what `process accounting' does. > > Look at the manpages of accton(8), lastcomm(1); then check the > accounting_enable knob in rc.conf(5) and /etc/defaults/rc.conf Thanks! I was looking under logging and auditing and tracing -- not accounting... Ricky From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 14:51:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986CF16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:51:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6217543D2F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:51:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 17074 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2005 14:51:53 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Apr 2005 14:51:53 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 81E3152; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:51:52 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Jonathon McKitrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050408133347.GB1809@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Apr 2005 10:51:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050408133347.GB1809@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Message-ID: <441x9l8gon.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Common Lisp on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:51:53 -0000 Jonathon McKitrick writes: > I noticed that the clisp port is marked broken, so I have to look at other > choices. > > Does anyone have any thoughts on the other Lisp ports as a good system to > learn on and use? Depends on what you're doing. Other than clisp, the Common Lisp implementations in ports are pretty much all derived from the same origin (the CMU implementation), so you might as well just try them and see what you like; the technical differences shouldn't be that big. [That's ignoring the "embeddable" one, but I wouldn't recommend that for learning.] Or maybe you should consider Scheme... but that's another holy war. Good luck. -- What? You expected a direct answer from *me*? Silly boy. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 14:55:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631CD16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:55:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.UU.SE [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6DF43D31 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:55:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id EDE984B10; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:55:20 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s208906; Fri, 8 Apr 05 16:55:18 +0200 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDE44B10; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:55:18 +0200 (MSZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id 5D83138013; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:55:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BACB5C002; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:55:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:55:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Davour To: Lowell Gilbert In-Reply-To: <44aco98hdw.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Message-ID: References: <44aco98hdw.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ps2pdf and ps2epsi behaving strange X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:55:23 -0000 On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Andreas Davour writes: > >> After using these tools, installing the epsmegre port (and some >> others) and then removing the latter again, the former have stopped >> working! >> >> bash-2.05b$ ps2pdf elcFront.ps >> Unknown device: pdfwrite >> bash-2.05b$ ps2epsi elcFront.ps >> Unknown device: bit >> bash-2.05b$ >> >> How come those devices they ask for have dissapeared, or why have they >> suddenly developed a need for them? >> >> Oddly enough, ps2epsi seems to produce the correct output, regardless >> of the error - ps2pdf not so. >> >> I have reinstalled ghostscript-gnu, but it didn't solve the problem. >> >> Are there some port around that messed with them in a way that didn't >> showed up untill I pkg_delete'd those ports? > > Possibly. That would be a bug in whichever port did that, and would > be worth fixing, but we'd have to identify the bug first. > > I think the file in question would be: > $ locate pdfwrite > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/7.07/lib/pdfwrite.ps > $ > so check to see if you have it. OK, so it is a file. I wasn't sure, and didn't think about "locate" it! bash-2.05b$ locate pdfwrite /usr/local/share/apps/kdeprint/filters/pdfwrite.desktop /usr/local/share/apps/kdeprint/filters/pdfwrite.xml /usr/local/share/ghostscript/7.07/lib/pdfwrite.ps /usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/lib/pdfwrite.ps Apparantly it's there. Now why it's used I have no idea. Of course, I now have no idea which ports I have installed, deleted and reinstalled again )or in what order). /Andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 15:03:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B794616A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:03:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.UU.SE [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB3E43D45 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:03:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 302094B21; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:03:33 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s213008; Fri, 8 Apr 05 17:03:30 +0200 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF0E4B2D; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:03:29 +0200 (MSZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id CD01D38016; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:03:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA645C002; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:03:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:03:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Davour To: Jonathon McKitrick In-Reply-To: <20050408133347.GB1809@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Message-ID: References: <20050408133347.GB1809@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Common Lisp on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:03:37 -0000 On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > > Hi all, > > I noticed that the clisp port is marked broken, so I have to look at other > choices. > > Does anyone have any thoughts on the other Lisp ports as a good system to > learn on and use? Install /usr/ports/lang/cmucl /usr/ports/lang/cmucl-extra /usr/ports/editors/emacs /usr/ports/editors/slime And you'll get a fast and reliable Common Lisp compiler, some extras like an debugger, an editor, an IDE or suchlike for handy Lisp development using emacs and a compiler of your choice. /usr/ports/lang/cmucl Can be substituted for /usr/ports/lang/sbcl But I like cmucl just fine. You'll fine it has much better support for e.g. CLOS than clisp has. /andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 15:07:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5893D16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:07:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A9343D53 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:07:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linicks@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so868400wra for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:07:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=JijCrjriFL7pbN2MJ7mZ5y9cEkAXHuyg3Iy4gN6FMpnUsGaYxJzd2L2Qusa+0YlFBnFpwsbSzmhOLsgbrYcy21OiSTSU2hv1FPare87QwasbERGBd6+5hCIWh8VA2svWdH5uH8IlIOQAbnWWQwfo0oMtNpYjhITeV+JjjbfIX9E= Received: by 10.54.66.18 with SMTP id o18mr918484wra; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:07:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.98.3 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:07:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:07:30 -0600 From: Nick Pavlica To: =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?Uro=9A_Gruber?= In-Reply-To: <42516000.90108@sir-mag.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <42516000.90108@sir-mag.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gvinum - gmirror X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nick Pavlica List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:07:31 -0000 T24gQXByIDQsIDIwMDUgOTo0MCBBTSwgVXJvuSBHcnViZXIgPHVyb3MuZ3J1YmVyQHNpci1tYWcu Y29tPiB3cm90ZToKPiBIaSEKPiAKPiBJIGhhdmUgb25lIHNlcnZlciA1LjNSQzIgYW5kIGl0J3Mg b24gR3ZpbnVtIFJBSUQxLiBJcyBpdCBzYWZlIHRvIHVwZ3JhZGUKPiB0byA1LjQKPiAoaXMgdGhl cmUgYW55IGJpZyB3b3JrIHNpbmNlIHRoZW4pLiBBbmQgb25lIHRoaW5nLiBJcyBpdCBwb3NzaWJs ZSB0bwo+IG1vdmUgZnJvbSBndmludW0gdG8KPiBnbWlycm9yIG9uIGxpdmUgd29ya2luZyBzZXJ2 ZXIgKHByb2R1Y3Rpb24pLiBJIGNhbiBkbyB0aGlzIG9ubHkgYnkgcmVtb3RlLgo+IAo+IHRpYQo+ IAo+IFVyb3MKPiBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f Xwo+IGZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdAo+IGh0dHA6Ly9s aXN0cy5mcmVlYnNkLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2ZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zCj4gVG8g dW5zdWJzY3JpYmUsIHNlbmQgYW55IG1haWwgdG8gIgpmcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9ucy11bnN1YnNj cmliZUBmcmVlYnNkLm9yZyIKPiAKCjUuNCB3aWxsIGJlIHdvcnRoIHRoZSB1cGdyYWRlLCBidXQg SSB3b3VsZCB3YWl0IGZvciBpdCB0byBiZWNvbWUgZmluYWwgCmJlZm9yZSBpbnN0YWxsaW5nIGl0 IG9uIGFueSBwcm9kdWN0aW9uIHNlcnZlcnMuIElmIHlvdSBoYXZlIGFueSB0ZXN0IHN5c3RlbXMg CnBsZWFzZSBzdGFydCB0ZXN0aW5nIGl0LiBUaGUgbW9yZSA1LjQgaXMgdGVzdGVkIGJlZm9yZSBy ZWxlYXNlIHRoZSBiZXR0ZXIuIEkgCmRvbid0IHRoaW5rIHRoYXQgeW91IHdpbGwgYmUgYWJsZSB0 byBtaWdyYXRlIGEgZ3ZpbnVtIHZvbHVtZSB0byBhIGdtaXJyb3IgCnZvbHVtZSBpbiBwbGFjZS4g WW91IHdpbGwgaGF2ZSB0byBiYWNrIGl0IHVwLCByZW1vdmUgdGhlIGd2aW51bSB2b2x1bWUsIHRo ZW4gCmNvbmZpZ3VyZSBnbWlycm9yIGFuZCByZXN0b3JlIHRoZSBkYXRhLCBldGMuCgotLU5pY2sK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 15:20:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE99116A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:20:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web30809.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30809.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E18C43D46 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:20:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wlh1074@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 16654 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Apr 2005 15:20:18 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=3xbWtUqzyAP17/npvJc5Tprd8hHpSn0uZ1aqziCg9OLxajuFiOK5tHH9MojT/mlAAtFPqvGK3dwGJh+olj0KcmvrHX6d7DZm2QNGUxQA4l8JtxxPB5fYoP02attDvQ7znlIHVCfoRNqOrBKVIN34tLmkn79n7hdZUhJery3xmps= ; Message-ID: <20050408152018.16652.qmail@web30809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [208.229.189.211] by web30809.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:20:18 PDT Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:20:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Wendell Hatcher To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Ports Fetch timedout X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:20:20 -0000 Hello, I have a slight problem with the 5.3 release and I checked all of your documentation,mailing,lists and on the web before coming to you. My problem is when I go into any port under the /usr/ports/directory and try building that port using make it times out. The only port that would build was the cvsup port and I used it to make my ports tree current so I know it is up to date. But when I go into a port make clean and make install none of the ports seem to work its goes out to fetch /ftp.XXXX and times out. I use a qwest dsl modem and I do not have a firewall setup but even if I did where would I make the changes neccessary for fetch to go out and download the ports. I can goto the sysinstall section and download ports and any data from any ftp site but when I try and do the same thing from the ports section it times out or when I try and use pkg_add the fecth keeps timing out. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. http://personals.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 16:00:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B9616A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:00:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate2.dslextreme.com (mailgate2.dslextreme.com [66.51.199.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B9F43D1F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:00:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmlewis@dslextreme.com) Received: from www.dslextreme.com (unknown [192.168.7.122]) by mailgate2.dslextreme.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CB2913A64D7 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:00:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0a0a0a0a.20050408090054.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:00:54 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joshua Lewis" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: DSL Extreme Webmail (www.dslextreme.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-DSLExtreme-MailGate-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DSLExtreme-MailGate: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jmlewis@dslextreme.com Subject: Build kernel vs build world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jmlewis@dslextreme.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:00:55 -0000 Is there a difference between building a world and building a kernel? Common sence is telling me building world rebuilds all the execuables and config files or something a little more intense then just the kernel. However I have not been able to find any instructions on how to "build world" not even in the handbook. I found building a kernel and was able to do that with no problems. But I would like to update my system with any security updates that have occured since 5.3 has come out. Thanks for any tips. Thank you, Joshua Lewis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 16:13:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3924F16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:13:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCFD43D45 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:13:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pergesu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so1148114wri for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:13:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=rIsOEwt61kSWhBwowelDTh8QtXNoWcaNZpIDj/0rxLvTGFqOD9avwZfVrWTyljQA/lDGZM2WGYIa9UKL6C6K21Iy7a98VD52vAQKvtgYGE7iZ9xtyh/GJGU0zV00Js3Sfg0unK8KIfpE+B6Q4+jF+iGLFsf5BiPF6RXYzOXkS2g= Received: by 10.54.2.60 with SMTP id 60mr953306wrb; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:13:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.42.28 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:13:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <810a540e05040809135e846cac@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:13:18 -0600 From: Pat Maddox To: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <0a0a0a0a.20050408090054.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <0a0a0a0a.20050408090054.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> Subject: Re: Build kernel vs build world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pat Maddox List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:13:21 -0000 You're right, building the world is building all the base binaries. It should be done while you're building the kernel: # make buildworld # make buildkernel kernconf=CONF # make installkernel kernconf=CONF # make installworld # mergemaster Here's a good guide on everything you need to do to update your machine: http://layer0.layeredtech.com/showthread.php?t=2 On Apr 8, 2005 10:00 AM, Joshua Lewis wrote: > Is there a difference between building a world and building a kernel? > > Common sence is telling me building world rebuilds all the execuables and > config files or something a little more intense then just the kernel. > > However I have not been able to find any instructions on how to "build > world" not even in the handbook. I found building a kernel and was able to > do that with no problems. But I would like to update my system with any > security updates that have occured since 5.3 has come out. > > Thanks for any tips. > > Thank you, > Joshua Lewis > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 16:16:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49F716A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:16:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from email.web-1hosting.net (mail-node1.web-1hosting.net [63.123.79.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDBB43D2D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:16:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tech@adtu.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by email.web-1hosting.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A501E1CD for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:18:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.168.243] (spencer-900-31.iowaone.net [12.167.40.62]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by email.web-1hosting.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629FD1C9 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:18:53 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4256AE6E.4040403@adtu.org> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:16:46 +0000 From: Aaron Sloan User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050328) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at web-1hosting.net Subject: cmpq dl380 server. ipmi bmc question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:16:58 -0000 Hello guys and gals, Does system fan control on a Compaq DL380 ,first edition, have any support? Sounds like a jet at idle in the machine room. I have looked through the acpi and port recomendations I have come across via google and I'm not having any luck at all. I believe it is supported in Linux but I don't know how. I can't say I'm any hardware wizard on this kind of thing. Update: I installed freeipmi and ipmitool and I'm not having any luck with these apps. The cli commands are apparently over my head because I haven't been able to get it to work and now my head hurts. Am I barking up the right tree or just peeing on it? HP was not terribly helpful. All the recent ROMpaks have been installed. Thanks, Aaron %sysctl hw.acpi hw.acpi.supported_sleep_state: S4 S5 hw.acpi.power_button_state: S5 hw.acpi.sleep_button_state: S4 hw.acpi.lid_switch_state: NONE hw.acpi.standby_state: S1 hw.acpi.suspend_state: S3 hw.acpi.sleep_delay: 1 hw.acpi.s4bios: 0 hw.acpi.verbose: 0 hw.acpi.reset_video: 1 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_usage: 100.00% hw.acpi.thermal.min_runtime: 0 hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate: 10 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 8.3C hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.active: -1 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.thermal_flags: 0 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV: 9.8C hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._HOT: -1 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT: 31.3C hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._ACx: -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 GENERIC kernel Is acpi0 what I should be looking for or is there another system controlling the system/case fan? CPU: Intel Pentium III (996.85-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x686 Stepping = 6 Features=0x383fbff real memory = 536854528 (511 MB) avail memory = 515682304 (491 MB) ACPI APIC Table: ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 8 MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI ioapic0 irqs 0-34 on motherboard npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x240-0x243 on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 pcib0: on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 ida0: port 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xc5000000-0xc5ffffff,0xc6000000-0xc6ffffff irq 19 at device 1.0 on pci0 ida0: drives=1 firm_rev=1.50 idad0: on ida0 idad0: 26017MB (53284800 sectors), blocksize=512 fxp0: port 0x2400-0x243f mem 0xc4e00000-0xc4efffff,0xc4fff000-0xc4ffffff irq 17 at device 2.0 on pci0 miibus0: on fxp0 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:02:a5:64:e6:95 pci0: at device 3.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 4.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 15.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x2c00-0x2c0f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 15.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 pcib1: on acpi0 pci3: on pcib1 acpi_tz0: on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model MouseMan+, device ID 0 ppc0: port 0x778-0x77d,0x378-0x37f irq 7 drq 0 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 fdc0: port 0x3f2-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 sio0: port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A orm0: at iomem 0xee000-0xeffff,0xe8000-0xedfff,0xc8000-0xcbfff,0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 pmtimer0 on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 996849075 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec acd0: CDROM at ata0-master PIO4 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/idad0s2a Thanks, Aaron From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 16:25:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6462A16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:25:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate2.dslextreme.com (mailgate2.dslextreme.com [66.51.199.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2342343D48 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:25:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmlewis@dslextreme.com) Received: from www.dslextreme.com (unknown [192.168.7.122]) by mailgate2.dslextreme.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 493153A6559; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:25:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <181f0a1d925a11a08a1a531a.20050408092519.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> In-Reply-To: <810a540e05040809136f7546bf@mail.gmail.com> References: <0a0a0a0a.20050408090054.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> <810a540e05040809136f7546bf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:25:19 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joshua Lewis" To: pergesu@gmail.com User-Agent: DSL Extreme Webmail (www.dslextreme.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-DSLExtreme-MailGate-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DSLExtreme-MailGate: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jmlewis@dslextreme.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build kernel vs build world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jmlewis@dslextreme.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:25:21 -0000 I was getting ready to build world and I noticed (to my utmost suprise) that my system is running 5.4-PRERELEASE. I must have had the wrong tag in my supfile and downloaded the src for 5.4. So I am already running 5.4 I guess I will upgrade totaly. Are there any gotcha's I should now about. At this point I think I am running 5.4 kernel with 5.3 binaries. So should I just to a CVSup with the 5.4 tag and then use the instructions below from Pat? Thank you, Joshua Lewis Pat Maddox > You're right, building the world is building all the base binaries. > It should be done while you're building the kernel: > # make buildworld > # make buildkernel kernconf=CONF > # make installkernel kernconf=CONF > # make installworld > # mergemaster > > Here's a good guide on everything you need to do to update your machine: > http://layer0.layeredtech.com/showthread.php?t=2 > > > > On Apr 8, 2005 10:00 AM, Joshua Lewis wrote: >> Is there a difference between building a world and building a kernel? >> >> Common sence is telling me building world rebuilds all the execuables >> and >> config files or something a little more intense then just the kernel. >> >> However I have not been able to find any instructions on how to "build >> world" not even in the handbook. I found building a kernel and was able >> to >> do that with no problems. But I would like to update my system with any >> security updates that have occured since 5.3 has come out. >> >> Thanks for any tips. >> >> Thank you, >> Joshua Lewis >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 16:31:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B44A16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:31:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prosporo.hedron.org (hedron.org [66.11.182.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7571243D48 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:31:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ean@hedron.org) Received: from www.hedron.org (localhost.hedron.org [127.0.0.1]) by prosporo.hedron.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4BFC118; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:31:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 216.220.59.169 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ean); by www.hedron.org with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:31:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4138.216.220.59.169.1112977905.squirrel@216.220.59.169> In-Reply-To: References: <42516000.90108@sir-mag.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:31:45 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ean Kingston" To: "Nick Pavlica" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Uro=9A_Gruber?= Subject: Re: gvinum - gmirror X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:31:45 -0000 > On Apr 4, 2005 9:40 AM, Uro¹ Gruber wrote: > > 5.4 will be worth the upgrade, but I would wait for it to become final > before installing it on any production servers. Can I take the above statement to mean that the vinum attach command (and other missing functionality from gvinum) will be working again. If so, thank you very much for your hard work. Also, any idea of the state of growfs (especially as it related to gvinum)? > If you have any test > systems > please start testing it. The more 5.4 is tested before release the better. > I > don't think that you will be able to migrate a gvinum volume to a gmirror > volume in place. You will have to back it up, remove the gvinum volume, > then > configure gmirror and restore the data, etc. > > --Nick > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Ean Kingston E-Mail: ean_AT_hedron_DOT_org PGP KeyID: 1024D/CBC5D6BB URL: http://www.hedron.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 16:32:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DD216A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:32:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from excalibur.fbunet.de (excalibur.fbunet.de [80.190.243.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D0843D3F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:32:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbusse@gmx.de) Received: from artus.fbunet.de (port-212-202-40-81.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.40.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by excalibur.fbunet.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0190919074 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:32:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:32:49 +0200 From: Fridtjof Busse To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050408183249.505119b7.fbusse@gmx.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.7 (GTK+ 2.6.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Firefox won't start X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:32:51 -0000 Hi I just installed FreeBSD 5.4RC, everything works so fine. Just firefox won't work (running xfce), neither the package nor the port. I can only start it as root, under a normal user nothing happens at all. /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox quits after a second and no firefox. How can I fix this? Thanks. -- Fridtjof Busse "Endorsing products is the American way of expressing individuality." -Calvin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 16:37:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096BF16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:37:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9304F43D39 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:37:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pergesu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 37so1155981wra for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:37:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=kBaS9KLQcw5OFAVLvIc0rHWpkgjPA5ozixc4j/7D1eIzdxgHAuGM6KsiB+T+55Ksj4pe8IDuNWpM/TwKnLjXXHyUB/XTWIDeT9B2guiLlZ62X/0HvwO78uYU9q4tS2Fztxj19LppPl6Bg22myl7cUpu+uRGJmNAbuFmdpdcB9GY= Received: by 10.54.28.31 with SMTP id b31mr72119wrb; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:37:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.42.28 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:37:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <810a540e050408093778f7b3a0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:37:11 -0600 From: Pat Maddox To: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <181f0a1d925a11a08a1a531a.20050408092519.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <0a0a0a0a.20050408090054.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> <810a540e05040809136f7546bf@mail.gmail.com> <181f0a1d925a11a08a1a531a.20050408092519.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> Subject: Re: Build kernel vs build world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pat Maddox List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:37:13 -0000 Are you sure you've never installed world? You generally have problems when the kernel and world are out of synch, and I've heard that mixing a 5.4/5.3 kernel and world causes real havoc. In any case, yeah, you should just cvsup, build the kernel and world. Pat On Apr 8, 2005 10:25 AM, Joshua Lewis wrote: > I was getting ready to build world and I noticed (to my utmost suprise) > that my system is running 5.4-PRERELEASE. I must have had the wrong tag in > my supfile and downloaded the src for 5.4. > > So I am already running 5.4 I guess I will upgrade totaly. Are there any > gotcha's I should now about. At this point I think I am running 5.4 kernel > with 5.3 binaries. So should I just to a CVSup with the 5.4 tag and then > use the instructions below from Pat? > > Thank you, > Joshua Lewis > > Pat Maddox > > You're right, building the world is building all the base binaries. > > It should be done while you're building the kernel: > > # make buildworld > > # make buildkernel kernconf=CONF > > # make installkernel kernconf=CONF > > # make installworld > > # mergemaster > > > > Here's a good guide on everything you need to do to update your machine: > > http://layer0.layeredtech.com/showthread.php?t=2 > > > > > > > > On Apr 8, 2005 10:00 AM, Joshua Lewis wrote: > >> Is there a difference between building a world and building a kernel? > >> > >> Common sence is telling me building world rebuilds all the execuables > >> and > >> config files or something a little more intense then just the kernel. > >> > >> However I have not been able to find any instructions on how to "build > >> world" not even in the handbook. I found building a kernel and was able > >> to > >> do that with no problems. But I would like to update my system with any > >> security updates that have occured since 5.3 has come out. > >> > >> Thanks for any tips. > >> > >> Thank you, > >> Joshua Lewis > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 16:37:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C917D16A4CF for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:37:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC60643D53 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:37:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tomasq@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 34so444395nzf for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:37:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=WXx2egQqjRGpGghgK7Pp0OruHJ47/PNnPqxBGTG43w3AUfZZgI2vAaXLTz9ZQCtrhCSzZq/bZETimT2Lrs+GCwkemW2BepsgQdDuiuM69bNCQHOte814mbLfudal61mKcTw2JWLXJClJ3zf8IuL0NIMxX8ahBq9maOYrWMSONS4= Received: by 10.36.25.19 with SMTP id 19mr96585nzy; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:37:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.2.19 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:37:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9e46c99e05040809374cef139e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:37:50 -0400 From: Tomas Quintero To: jmlewis@dslextreme.com In-Reply-To: <181f0a1d925a11a08a1a531a.20050408092519.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <0a0a0a0a.20050408090054.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> <810a540e05040809136f7546bf@mail.gmail.com> <181f0a1d925a11a08a1a531a.20050408092519.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> cc: pergesu@gmail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build kernel vs build world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tomas Quintero List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:37:51 -0000 If your supfile was set to RELENG_5 then you getting 5.4-PRERELEASE is correct, as -STABLE becomes the next -RELEASE, so on and so forth. On Apr 8, 2005 12:25 PM, Joshua Lewis wrote: > I was getting ready to build world and I noticed (to my utmost suprise) > that my system is running 5.4-PRERELEASE. I must have had the wrong tag in > my supfile and downloaded the src for 5.4. > > So I am already running 5.4 I guess I will upgrade totaly. Are there any > gotcha's I should now about. At this point I think I am running 5.4 kernel > with 5.3 binaries. So should I just to a CVSup with the 5.4 tag and then > use the instructions below from Pat? > > Thank you, > Joshua Lewis > > Pat Maddox > > You're right, building the world is building all the base binaries. > > It should be done while you're building the kernel: > > # make buildworld > > # make buildkernel kernconf=CONF > > # make installkernel kernconf=CONF > > # make installworld > > # mergemaster > > > > Here's a good guide on everything you need to do to update your machine: > > http://layer0.layeredtech.com/showthread.php?t=2 > > > > > > > > On Apr 8, 2005 10:00 AM, Joshua Lewis wrote: > >> Is there a difference between building a world and building a kernel? > >> > >> Common sence is telling me building world rebuilds all the execuables > >> and > >> config files or something a little more intense then just the kernel. > >> > >> However I have not been able to find any instructions on how to "build > >> world" not even in the handbook. I found building a kernel and was able > >> to > >> do that with no problems. But I would like to update my system with any > >> security updates that have occured since 5.3 has come out. > >> > >> Thanks for any tips. > >> > >> Thank you, > >> Joshua Lewis > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- -Tomas Quintero From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 16:51:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F1C16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:51:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D356D43D39 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:51:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050408165127.LCJM4618.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:51:27 -0400 From: To: "Gareth Bailey" , "freebsd-questions" Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:51:26 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <48a5f32a0504080626383f5441@mail.gmail.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Subject: RE: IPF Firewall Rules... help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:51:28 -0000 Gareth If you read the limewire website carefully you will see that no where does it say it will work on PC on a local area network (LAN). This is one of those products that buries the sending IP address in the packets. A PC on the LAN uses an NATed ip address and this product can not handle that. This is a common problem with products such as this. This is not an firewall problem. It's a design error in the products internet communications exchange of session packets. It's just not designed to work on PC that is on a LAN. To use this product your XP box has to be connected to the internet with a real public IP address. IE: not be on a LAN using NATed IP address. For your INFO attaching files is a bad thing to do. That is how virus get passed around and many people here on this list will not open them. Next time just post file content into body of your email post. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gareth Bailey Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 9:26 AM To: freebsd-questions Subject: Fwd: IPF Firewall Rules... help! Hi Bob, Thanks, I have read the handbook and a couple of other articles. I have attached my ipf and ipnat rule lists. Please advise on the commented out Bit torrent sections. The windows clients want to run Limewire. WRT the LAN environment, we have a couple of Windows XP SP2 clients, and the freeBSD gateway. The external connection from the gateway runs upstairs into the block's router, which is connected to an ADSL router (no static IP). Thanks for your help! Gareth On Apr 8, 2005 2:51 PM, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > Read the official FreeBSD handbook firewall section. It has working > examples. Any more help can only be offered if you post your rules > and give details of your LAN environment. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gareth > Bailey > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 8:16 AM > To: freebsd-questions > Subject: IPF Firewall Rules... help! > > We have a freebsd gateway server for windows clients. We use IPF > with nat. > > What ipf rules and ipnat rules are required on the gateway for > Limewire peer-to-peer to connect on the clients. > > If you can help, please do... i'm doing something wrong! > > Thanks > Gareth > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 16:54:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7A016A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:54:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from galaxy.systems.pipex.net (galaxy.systems.pipex.net [62.241.162.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC5443D45 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:54:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark.cullen@dsl.pipex.com) Received: from [10.0.0.251] (81-179-228-238.dsl.pipex.com [81.179.228.238]) by galaxy.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640BAE0001DA; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:54:36 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4256C50B.5040803@dsl.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:53:15 +0100 From: Mark Cullen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert References: <4252FFF1.507@dsl.pipex.com> <443bu2oh4c.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <443bu2oh4c.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhclient oddness? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:54:41 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Mark Cullen writes: > > >>Right, I have this weird annoying issue with my modem which I have >>finally got around to looking in to. Basically, it's all good and >>works fine (obviously, otherwise I wouldn't be here!), except when I >>reboot the internet computer the IP will change, the connection >>DOESN'T drop, but the IP does change. I have just now narrowed this >>down to some sort of problem with dhcp I think. >> >>The modem has a dhcpd server built in, which sends out the internet IP >>address to the computers network card. It seems, whenever the dhcp >>client, dhclient in this case, gets restarted it'll get the old ip >>address (the first chunk of the quote below, before the ), >>natd will update itself, but then the connection will just stall until >>dhclient does the next DHCPREQUEST thing (47 seconds in this case?) >>.. then the modem sends back a DHCPNAK and I get a different IP >>address. Any ideas why this might be happening? > > > Your "modem" is clearly the source of the problem, and it seems > unlikely that anything on the FreeBSD side could help, aside from > maybe forcing a lease free before starting dhclient on startup. > > I'd try looking at the configuration for that "modem" device, or > possibly for a firmware upgrade for it. > Hi, Could you explain what's going on to me? I mean, in simplified terms, what exactly is causing the modem to get a new IP address when dhclient restarts? I have contacted them about the issue and they seem to think it's an O/S problem (well, it's *obviously* not an issue with their modem now, is it? :-P). How would I go about forcing a 'lease free'? Delete dhclient.leases, or some option somewhere that I missed? As for configuration, there's no config for the DHCP server and there's never been a firmware upgrade for it (this is the only issue I have EVER had with it and I expect most users don't notice it). Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 17:00:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AEC16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:00:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hoemail1.lucent.com (hoemail1.lucent.com [192.11.226.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE64243D5C for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:00:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from woloschi@lucent.com) Received: from il0015exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-1-23-83.lucent.com [135.1.23.83]) by hoemail1.lucent.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j38H0a4F008410 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:00:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: by il0015exch001h.ih.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:00:36 -0500 Message-ID: <17D8724A2A8D9542B2B8AE546B9E5BBC03B0D045@az4315exch001u.phx.lucent.com> From: "WOLOSCHAK, FRANK, JR (FRANK)" To: "'questions@FreeBSD.org'" Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:00:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: FreeBSD 5.3 X-Windows Config During Installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:00:39 -0000 Good Morning, I am having problems installing FreeBSD 5.3. It appears that the installation options do not include: "Configure XFree86 Server" and "Configure XFree86 Desktop". I am aware that version 5.3 now uses "Xorg" vice "Xfree86" as the default X-Windows system. I am fluent in several varies of Unix (Solaris, HPUX, Red Hat, SCO), but am new to FreeBSD. When installing FreeBSD 5.0, I was given the 2 above options, and was able to set a Gnome Desktop. Numerous attempts to install FreeBSD 5.3, I was never given the above options, and although I was eventually able to get a brain-dead Gnome desktop to appear, I couldn't do anything with it. QUESTIONS: 1) Why doesn't the FreeBSD 5.3 install give configuration options for the X-Windows server and desktop? 2) If the answer to #1 is that the "Xorg" implementation doesn't contain these, then please help me find the "easiest" way to setup the Gnome desktop following a new fresh installation. My intent is to continue playing with FreeBSD, and explore "kick start" here at work. Thank you for your help, Have A Wonderful Day, Ivan Frank "Ivan" Woloschak AG Communication Systems 623.581.4123 Beeper: 888.235.4081 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 17:02:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 386C316A4CF; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:02:01 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20050408170201.386C316A4CF@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:02:01 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:02:01 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2004/09/19 02:40:48 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions, -newbies or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions, -newbies or -hackers? =================================================== Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In addition, the FreeBSD-newbies list caters specifically for people who are new to FreeBSD and may be having trouble getting used to the environment. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If you're new to FreeBSD, and the message is about your own relationship to FreeBSD, send the message to FreeBSD-newbies. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.5 2004/09/19 02:40:48 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 17:02:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 40F8D16A4D0; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:02:01 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20050408170201.40F8D16A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:02:01 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:02:01 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm constantly updating it. Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 17:19:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5381C16A4CE; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:19:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7BE43D31; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:19:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 24C4272DDD; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE4972DD4; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:19:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Brian Behlendorf In-Reply-To: <20050407013544.W73813@paz.hyperreal.org> Message-ID: <20050408101651.L63303@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <200504061842.43294.eugene@imedia.ru> <42548B2D.9010503@xena.ipaustralia.gov.au> <20050407013544.W73813@paz.hyperreal.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Carl Makin cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IBM eServer 346 ServeRaid is too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:19:07 -0000 In the future, don't cross post -questions and other lists. I'm leaving the cc: on since we may have people watching the thread, but please remove -questions for any followups. Thanks. On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Carl Makin wrote: > > I'd say you are seeing the same as I am with the same card in a Dell 1855. > > There is something wrong with the mpt driver and the disks when they are > > setup in a raid0 set. If you split the disks and use them as individual > > drives then you will get full performance. > > It's also a known problem, though not being tracked very well. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2004-December/001577.html > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2004-December/001578.html > > Doesn't look like (from viewcvs.cgi) there's been any recent work on > this. We're waiting on a driver update that is tied up in legalities at the moment. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 17:19:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEF016A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:19:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8222943D48 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:19:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF14C5CA8; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:19:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66173-08; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:19:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-53-96.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.53.96]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FD65E88; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:19:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4256BCCA.3000300@mac.com> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:18:02 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wendell Hatcher References: <20050408152018.16652.qmail@web30809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050408152018.16652.qmail@web30809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Ports Fetch timedout X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:19:32 -0000 Wendell Hatcher wrote: > I have a slight problem with the 5.3 release and I > checked all of your documentation,mailing,lists and on > the web before coming to you. My problem is when I go > into any port under the /usr/ports/directory and try > building that port using make it times out. Can you try running fetch or the ftp command on the URL the port attempts to download by hand? If that doesn't work, you'll need to solve that problem before the ports tree can download stuff automaticly. My guess is that you're missing an /etc/resolv.conf which points to valid nameservers, but it would help to quote an error message... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 17:29:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09AE016A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:29:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web30806.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30806.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9904343D31 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:29:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wlh1074@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 62691 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Apr 2005 17:29:05 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=Fu4efQhSHmpaSOIiWr3B95jML/Ug2QpEpn0m4XAnbQNCNSpAFHTTpiF7yE3SAxTQ6V/aDO1ll4WUWiYnFXttzbxY9Te9tZVvRzKTBWIptnxcRHWb+9QQUej+C+2ufL8q6YXNKdwqBBF/4yuBPZa2DFvnvDKOSM2huSFrSjdPfPA= ; Message-ID: <20050408172905.62689.qmail@web30806.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [208.229.189.211] by web30806.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:29:04 PDT Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:29:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Wendell Hatcher To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Fetch ports timedout X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:29:06 -0000 Hello, I have a slight problem with the 5.3 release and I checked all of your documentation,mailing,lists and on the web before coming to you. My problem is when I go into any port under the /usr/ports/directory and try building that port using make it times out. The only port that would build was the cvsup port and I used it to make my ports tree current so I know it is up to date. But when I go into a port make clean and make install none of the ports seem to work its goes out to fetch /ftp.XXXX and times out. I use a qwest dsl modem and I do not have a firewall setup but even if I did where would I make the changes neccessary for fetch to go out and download the ports. I can goto the sysinstall section and download ports and any data from any ftp site but when I try and do the same thing from the ports section it times out or when I try and use pkg_add the fecth keeps timing out. __________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 17:46:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3C816A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:46:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web30807.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30807.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB92F43D41 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:46:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wlh1074@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 55525 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Apr 2005 17:46:57 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=ifQUeOFs6je0Sb2oqPk+Ph7xvH/Fzr4P06OLuo8JQOk9eXY1BvHSgI8YGWSm01R4jOa/9XBMpmlmumDtBNfFASnIMPPQn+Ls6gvoisTiY/exISQnQUefz9mRi2lNOarhaV54pK0NYHmAmISQ/Rfz8p1ppM1oCAT8rd1HSqateJk= ; Message-ID: <20050408174657.55523.qmail@web30807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [208.229.189.211] by web30807.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:46:57 PDT Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:46:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Wendell Hatcher To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: fetch ports timedout X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:46:58 -0000 Hello, I have a slight problem with the 5.3 release and I checked all of your documentation,mailing,lists and on the web before coming to you. My problem is when I go into any port under the /usr/ports/directory and try building that port using make it times out. The only port that would build was the cvsup port and I used it to make my ports tree current so I know it is up to date. But when I go into a port make clean and make install none of the ports seem to work its goes out to fetch /ftp.XXXX and times out. I use a qwest dsl modem and I do not have a firewall setup but even if I did where would I make the changes neccessary for fetch to go out and download the ports. I can goto the sysinstall section and download ports and any data from any ftp site but when I try and do the same thing from the ports section it times out or when I try and use pkg_add the fecth keeps timing out. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 17:52:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDFF16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:52:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F0243D2D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:52:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53203222400 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:52:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05862-15 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:52:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CB021F595 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:52:21 -0500 (CDT) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:52:15 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5217541.q52luOL9Ol"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504081252.19279.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Automounting smbfs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:52:25 -0000 --nextPart5217541.q52luOL9Ol Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline The built-in amd automounter may work great for NFS, but I increasingly fin= d=20 myself mounting Windows shares and amd doesn't seem to support them. Any=20 suggestions? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart5217541.q52luOL9Ol Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBCVsTT5sRg+Y0CpvERAn50AJ0V3nn88ptmeD5Bg8jBmgAz2LOFhgCdH7nN zs4ZlhkonciwgjB0lgBx5lM= =awh2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5217541.q52luOL9Ol-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 17:57:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F127816A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:57:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.aheyn.com (lifestylecomm.com [66.9.27.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC7E43D31 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:57:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aheyn@lifestylecomm.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.aheyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB73181519 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:58:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.aheyn.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lifestylecomm.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61146-07 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:58:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from AREILLPC (ns.jmsent.com [66.9.27.146]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.aheyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878451814F2 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:58:06 -0400 (EDT) From: "Andrew Heyn" To: Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:56:49 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lifestylecomm.com Subject: Compaq Proliant 8500 issue with Integrated SMART Array RAID Controller (ida) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:57:06 -0000 Hi, I have a Compaq Proliant 8500 with the integrated SMART Array RAID controller. I recall seeing "Symbios" and "ARM" on a chip on the center of the PCI module must be the RAID controller. I used to have extreme problems even getting the system to boot up until I used the SmartStart CD and disabled the "Array Accelerator" for my one and only RAID1+0 Container. (Before doing this) I would get numerous ida0: soft write error and if the system did manage to boot up, a process might read the disk, and forever be stuck in some kernel routine between userland and the disk that gets a block or whatever. Now, I only get an occasional "ida0: soft read/write error" which occasionally causes a 15 or so second delay. The "Array Accelerator" for the Integrated SMART array controller is 8MB of read-only cache. Other SMART Array models like the 4200 have battery backed up cache that can be user-separated between write and read cache. I'm wondering if anybody has ever seen the problem mentioned above. I would hate to have to replace the whole PCI module because of some bad controller ram since that darn thing is integrated, and would make useless the internal bays if another raid card was added. As a note, the contacts between the hard drive and the drive module have been cleaned out multiple times for all the drives in the array. The connection between the drive module and the back of the computer is sturdy and clean. There are only TWO cables in this entire system that I know of, and one is for the IDE CDROM, and one is for the floppy. So, cabling cannot be a problem. I also have two working PSUs that each have a 120V line going into it, so I doubt it's a lack of power. Even though 220V is recommended for both of them, it works fine with even just one 120V line. I asked the HP/Compaq forum and they weren't able to give me much more of an answer than "check the cabling" and "blow off the dust" which I found extremely irritating because the data is carried on copper wires that resemble the pins found on an IDE hard drive or floppy, not your standard "cabling." I might ultimately be wrong...but I doubt it. Thanks, Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 18:00:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3DC16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:00:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate3.dslextreme.com (mailgate3.dslextreme.com [66.51.199.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4E743D1D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:00:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmlewis@dslextreme.com) Received: from www.dslextreme.com (unknown [192.168.7.122]) by mailgate3.dslextreme.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B1FD91A4124 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:01:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0a0a0a0a.20050408110007.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> In-Reply-To: <9e46c99e05040809374cef139e@mail.gmail.com> References: <0a0a0a0a.20050408090054.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> <810a540e05040809136f7546bf@mail.gmail.com> <181f0a1d925a11a08a1a531a.20050408092519.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> <9e46c99e05040809374cef139e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:00:07 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joshua Lewis" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: DSL Extreme Webmail (www.dslextreme.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-DSLExtreme-MailGate-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DSLExtreme-MailGate: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jmlewis@dslextreme.com Subject: Re: Build kernel vs build world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jmlewis@dslextreme.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:00:09 -0000 I already started the build world so at this point it may be too late. But I recall when I was using 4.10 to put stuff if like a make config file to prevent the system from upgrading BIND8 as I was using BIND9 at the time. Does anyone know what config file I am talking about so I know for future upgrades. What kind of stuff goes in there? I will read the man page if someone know what file I am talking about. Hard to answer a question when the guy(me) can't even ask it correctly. Thank you, Joshua Lewis Tomas Quintero > If your supfile was set to RELENG_5 then you getting 5.4-PRERELEASE is > correct, as -STABLE becomes the next -RELEASE, so on and so forth. > > On Apr 8, 2005 12:25 PM, Joshua Lewis wrote: >> I was getting ready to build world and I noticed (to my utmost suprise) >> that my system is running 5.4-PRERELEASE. I must have had the wrong tag >> in >> my supfile and downloaded the src for 5.4. >> >> So I am already running 5.4 I guess I will upgrade totaly. Are there any >> gotcha's I should now about. At this point I think I am running 5.4 >> kernel >> with 5.3 binaries. So should I just to a CVSup with the 5.4 tag and then >> use the instructions below from Pat? >> >> Thank you, >> Joshua Lewis >> >> Pat Maddox >> > You're right, building the world is building all the base binaries. >> > It should be done while you're building the kernel: >> > # make buildworld >> > # make buildkernel kernconf=CONF >> > # make installkernel kernconf=CONF >> > # make installworld >> > # mergemaster >> > >> > Here's a good guide on everything you need to do to update your >> machine: >> > http://layer0.layeredtech.com/showthread.php?t=2 >> > >> > >> > >> > On Apr 8, 2005 10:00 AM, Joshua Lewis wrote: >> >> Is there a difference between building a world and building a kernel? >> >> >> >> Common sence is telling me building world rebuilds all the execuables >> >> and >> >> config files or something a little more intense then just the kernel. >> >> >> >> However I have not been able to find any instructions on how to >> "build >> >> world" not even in the handbook. I found building a kernel and was >> able >> >> to >> >> do that with no problems. But I would like to update my system with >> any >> >> security updates that have occured since 5.3 has come out. >> >> >> >> Thanks for any tips. >> >> >> >> Thank you, >> >> Joshua Lewis >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > -- > -Tomas Quintero > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 18:02:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B406216A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:02:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ss.eunet.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01E343D31 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) Received: from localhost.i.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13]) by ss.eunet.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j38I1p0w016822; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:01:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) From: Michal Mertl To: Richard Morse In-Reply-To: References: <0C6023A0-A83B-11D9-B765-000A956EB07E@partners.org> <20050408144104.GA75094@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:01:50 +0200 Message-Id: <1112983310.627.1.camel@genius2.i.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any way to log all process launches? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:02:01 -0000 Richard Morse wrote: > On 8 Apr 2005, at 10:41 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > On 2005-04-08 10:32, Richard Morse wrote: > >> Hi! I'm trying to track down an odd problem, for which it would be > >> very useful to be able to have the computer keep track of every > >> process that gets created -- ie, keep a list of every fork / exec that > >> occurs. Is this possible? > > > > Yes, it is possible. This is part of what `process accounting' does. > > > > Look at the manpages of accton(8), lastcomm(1); then check the > > accounting_enable knob in rc.conf(5) and /etc/defaults/rc.conf > > Thanks! I was looking under logging and auditing and tracing -- not > accounting... If you need more detailed information some patches at garage.freebsd.pl might be interesting - especially lrexec. It may be a bit outdated but it provides you with the information standard utilities don't. Michal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 18:07:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CBD16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:07:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgw.aecom.yu.edu (mailgw.aecom.yu.edu [129.98.1.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C531743D5D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:07:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from synrat@wirewalk.org) Received: from mailvx.aecom.yu.edu (mailvx.aecom.yu.edu [129.98.1.17]) by mailgw.aecom.yu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j38I7Z1v032365 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:07:35 -0400 Received: from post.aecom.yu.edu ([129.98.1.100]) by mailvx.aecom.yu.edu (SAVSMTP 3.1.1.32) with SMTP id M2005040814073411057 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:07:34 -0400 Received: from [129.98.4.95] (kgb.rit.aecom.yu.edu [129.98.4.95]) by post.aecom.yu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87622994 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:07:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4256C866.7000901@wirewalk.org> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:07:34 -0400 From: synrat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050323 Fedora/1.7.6-1.3.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: mpd and subnet mask X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:07:36 -0000 I got mpd working with little pain, on FB 5.3. all xp clients are able to connect and browse the network resources, but no real tcp-ip action is happening inside the VPN. I can't ping anything or connect to any ports on other machines, therefore can't use network based applications on machines other then VPN server. It seems that the subnet mask of the pptp interface gets set to 255.255.255.255, eventhough ipcp ranges are configured as follows. set ipcp ranges 192.168.0.201/24 192.168.10.202/24 I turned off the "default gateway" option on the clients. has anyone run into this ? thanx a lot in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 18:08:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF9516A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:08:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F11143D55 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:08:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbbaggs@earthlink.net) Received: from [10.0.10.5] (cpe-24-165-11-242.san.res.rr.com [24.165.11.242]) j38I8QgQ005566 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4256C89A.1030603@earthlink.net> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:08:26 -0700 From: Jeremy Baggs User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050326) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: UFS endianness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:08:29 -0000 I was just wondering if anyone was working on support for NeXT/Apple UFS file systems under FreeBSD. Jeremy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 18:08:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D29A16A4D4 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:08:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAD143D5C for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:08:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADE25E16; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:08:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66555-02; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:08:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-53-96.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.53.96]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A895DD7; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:08:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4256C84A.2030109@mac.com> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:07:06 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jmlewis@dslextreme.com References: <0a0a0a0a.20050408090054.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> <810a540e05040809136f7546bf@mail.gmail.com> <181f0a1d925a11a08a1a531a.20050408092519.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> <9e46c99e05040809374cef139e@mail.gmail.com> <0a0a0a0a.20050408110007.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> In-Reply-To: <0a0a0a0a.20050408110007.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build kernel vs build world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:08:32 -0000 Joshua Lewis wrote: > I already started the build world so at this point it may be too late. But > I recall when I was using 4.10 to put stuff if like a make config file to > prevent the system from upgrading BIND8 as I was using BIND9 at the time. > Does anyone know what config file I am talking about so I know for future > upgrades. You're talking about /etc/make.conf. Take a look at /etc/defaults/make.conf for an idea about the possible values... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 18:14:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC2216A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:14:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485D343D2F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:14:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 20767 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2005 18:14:26 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Apr 2005 18:14:26 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2715A52; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:14:26 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Mark Cullen References: <4252FFF1.507@dsl.pipex.com> <443bu2oh4c.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <4256C50B.5040803@dsl.pipex.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Apr 2005 14:14:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4256C50B.5040803@dsl.pipex.com> Message-ID: <44ekdl3zlq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 50 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhclient oddness? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:14:27 -0000 Mark Cullen writes: > Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > Mark Cullen writes: > > > >>Right, I have this weird annoying issue with my modem which I have > >>finally got around to looking in to. Basically, it's all good and > >>works fine (obviously, otherwise I wouldn't be here!), except when I > >>reboot the internet computer the IP will change, the connection > >>DOESN'T drop, but the IP does change. I have just now narrowed this > >>down to some sort of problem with dhcp I think. > >> > >>The modem has a dhcpd server built in, which sends out the internet IP > >>address to the computers network card. It seems, whenever the dhcp > >>client, dhclient in this case, gets restarted it'll get the old ip > >>address (the first chunk of the quote below, before the ), > >>natd will update itself, but then the connection will just stall until > >>dhclient does the next DHCPREQUEST thing (47 seconds in this case?) > >>.. then the modem sends back a DHCPNAK and I get a different IP > >>address. Any ideas why this might be happening? > > Your "modem" is clearly the source of the problem, and it seems > > unlikely that anything on the FreeBSD side could help, aside from > > maybe forcing a lease free before starting dhclient on startup. > > I'd try looking at the configuration for that "modem" device, or > > possibly for a firmware upgrade for it. > > > > Could you explain what's going on to me? I mean, in simplified terms, > what exactly is causing the modem to get a new IP address when > dhclient restarts? I have contacted them about the issue and they > seem to think it's an O/S problem (well, it's *obviously* not an issue > with their modem now, is it? :-P). Okay, now I'm confused. I thought your FreeBSD machine was the one being issued a new address, not the modem. [And that since the address was being issued *by* the modem, it was making the decision about which address to choose. I guess that means I was assuming your "modem" was doing NAT. Does the modem have an address at all? > How would I go about forcing a 'lease free'? Delete dhclient.leases, > or some option somewhere that I missed? I'm pretty sure that dhclient(8) has an command-line option to do it. > As for configuration, there's no config for the DHCP server and > there's never been a firmware upgrade for it (this is the only issue I > have EVER had with it and I expect most users don't notice it). Since you've rebooted your computer anyway, why do you care? You've just lost all of your connections already. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 18:18:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E6616A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:18:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate3.dslextreme.com (mailgate3.dslextreme.com [66.51.199.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6083643D2F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:18:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmlewis@dslextreme.com) Received: from www.dslextreme.com (unknown [192.168.7.122]) by mailgate3.dslextreme.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A255A1A4156; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4256C84A.2030109@mac.com> References: <0a0a0a0a.20050408090054.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> <810a540e05040809136f7546bf@mail.gmail.com> <181f0a1d925a11a08a1a531a.20050408092519.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> <9e46c99e05040809374cef139e@mail.gmail.com> <0a0a0a0a.20050408110007.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> <4256C84A.2030109@mac.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:18:11 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joshua Lewis" To: "Chuck Swiger" User-Agent: DSL Extreme Webmail (www.dslextreme.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-DSLExtreme-MailGate-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DSLExtreme-MailGate: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jmlewis@dslextreme.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build kernel vs build world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jmlewis@dslextreme.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:18:12 -0000 Thanks to everyone for the good advice. I have everything I need now. Thank you, Joshua Lewis Chuck Swiger > Joshua Lewis wrote: >> I already started the build world so at this point it may be too late. >> But >> I recall when I was using 4.10 to put stuff if like a make config file >> to >> prevent the system from upgrading BIND8 as I was using BIND9 at the >> time. >> Does anyone know what config file I am talking about so I know for >> future >> upgrades. > > You're talking about /etc/make.conf. Take a look at > /etc/defaults/make.conf > for an idea about the possible values... > > -- > -Chuck > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 18:19:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B90916A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:19:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web61105.mail.yahoo.com (web61105.mail.yahoo.com [216.155.196.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C88AC43D49 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:19:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nrkersten@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 59200 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Apr 2005 18:19:20 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=h65tP2EZr2yAaf9V+3fyM5nuGKThXMDJ5XkP9ztfFezt9CYPODma7OkWMUt91E/TkbIyZp3MIUn4ry6frD6RLFWjj2tKRtO6RRy6Qs6vv0SMMwhembS3mxeFYmtKj29X7EPMGh71fFEcKAUhZZnQ1IZV6AMJ6NsZUQjOVMajNVg= ; Message-ID: <20050408181920.59197.qmail@web61105.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [172.148.21.244] by web61105.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:19:19 PDT Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:19:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Nico Kersten To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:19:21 -0000 after final confirmation of installation, my screen reads all filesystem information written successfully. it just stays here, rather than going post-installation configuration. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 18:23:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58EC16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:23:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0A543D2F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:23:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alfredoj69@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so775017rng for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:23:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=m8/n4X9eyLKbc0C/Hwd8RfGynoupzck+Uy4OiuyIOdsf9xSCsD/oVh5ugA/W33cW1ebrKzHRDjH1i5ZOzJQ0DlFixB+mzlLTEQ0n/LMxnyvzTqMhbP3n9AkkbcymmBb7PL3NnsybEGS96qrgMaJETRe6x/zj+gwLsHA7InUUA44= Received: by 10.39.1.60 with SMTP id d60mr372765rni; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.100? ([70.24.135.21]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 74sm1300499rnb.2005.04.08.11.23.02; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4256CC07.1060305@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:23:03 -0400 From: Aperez User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Portupgrade problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: alfredoj69@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:23:03 -0000 Hi I am having the following problem when I try to upgrade my ports: portupgrade -arR cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/multimedia/nautilus-media Port directory not found: multimedia/nautilus-media !multimedia/nautilus-media (nautilus-media-0.8.0_4) (port directory error) I checked in /usr/ports/multimedia and of course there is not such directory. Is there a way I can fix this? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 18:41:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A2116A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:41:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from galaxy.systems.pipex.net (galaxy.systems.pipex.net [62.241.162.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2688E43D1D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:41:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark.cullen@dsl.pipex.com) Received: from [10.0.0.251] (81-179-228-238.dsl.pipex.com [81.179.228.238]) by galaxy.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6543E000329; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:41:29 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4256DE19.2020904@dsl.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:40:09 +0100 From: Mark Cullen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert References: <4252FFF1.507@dsl.pipex.com> <443bu2oh4c.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <4256C50B.5040803@dsl.pipex.com> <44ekdl3zlq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44ekdl3zlq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhclient oddness? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:41:33 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Mark Cullen writes: > > >>Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> >>>Mark Cullen writes: >>> >>> >>>>Right, I have this weird annoying issue with my modem which I have >>>>finally got around to looking in to. Basically, it's all good and >>>>works fine (obviously, otherwise I wouldn't be here!), except when I >>>>reboot the internet computer the IP will change, the connection >>>>DOESN'T drop, but the IP does change. I have just now narrowed this >>>>down to some sort of problem with dhcp I think. >>>> >>>>The modem has a dhcpd server built in, which sends out the internet IP >>>>address to the computers network card. It seems, whenever the dhcp >>>>client, dhclient in this case, gets restarted it'll get the old ip >>>>address (the first chunk of the quote below, before the ), >>>>natd will update itself, but then the connection will just stall until >>>>dhclient does the next DHCPREQUEST thing (47 seconds in this case?) >>>>.. then the modem sends back a DHCPNAK and I get a different IP >>>>address. Any ideas why this might be happening? >>> >>>Your "modem" is clearly the source of the problem, and it seems >>>unlikely that anything on the FreeBSD side could help, aside from >>>maybe forcing a lease free before starting dhclient on startup. >>>I'd try looking at the configuration for that "modem" device, or >>>possibly for a firmware upgrade for it. >>> >> >>Could you explain what's going on to me? I mean, in simplified terms, >>what exactly is causing the modem to get a new IP address when >>dhclient restarts? I have contacted them about the issue and they >>seem to think it's an O/S problem (well, it's *obviously* not an issue >>with their modem now, is it? :-P). > > > Okay, now I'm confused. I thought your FreeBSD machine was the one > being issued a new address, not the modem. [And that since the > address was being issued *by* the modem, it was making the decision > about which address to choose. I guess that means I was assuming your > "modem" was doing NAT. Does the modem have an address at all? > > Ooops, sorry. The FreeBSD machine does have the IP address assigned to it's network card. I don't quite know how it works, but they seem to call it 'Live IP technology'. I think maybe most people know it as 'PPP Half-Bridge', maybe?? The address is issued, to the FreeBSD network card, by the modem via DHCP. The FreeBSD machine does the NAT and everything. As far as I am aware the modem actually holds the IP, so it's kind of annoying that, just because dhclient gets restarted, the modem decides that the IP address has to change. Surely, since the modem's actually doing all the work and holding the connection, it should be able to give me back my old IP address?? Shouldn't it? >>How would I go about forcing a 'lease free'? Delete dhclient.leases, >>or some option somewhere that I missed? > > > I'm pretty sure that dhclient(8) has an command-line option to do it. > Ok, I will have a look and give it a try! > >>As for configuration, there's no config for the DHCP server and >>there's never been a firmware upgrade for it (this is the only issue I >>have EVER had with it and I expect most users don't notice it). > > > Since you've rebooted your computer anyway, why do you care? You've > just lost all of your connections already. > Because I would like to try and keep the same IP as long as possible :P I've been given admin on a game server that goes by IP address and cannot afford my ISPs 'static IP' options. Furthermore, they stopped with the 'sticky IP addresses' apparently :-( -- Internet Explorer? Try FireFox at http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ Outlook Express? Try ThunderBird at http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 18:45:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77BB16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:45:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from addr9.addr.com (addr9.addr.com [209.249.147.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A9F43D31 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:45:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markzero@logik.ath.cx) Received: from logik.ath.cx (localhost [127.0.0.1])j38IixfN092496; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by logik.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8D2BE6101; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:44:57 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:44:57 +0100 From: markzero To: Michal Mertl Message-ID: <20050408184457.GA7173@logik.ath.cx> References: <0C6023A0-A83B-11D9-B765-000A956EB07E@partners.org> <20050408144104.GA75094@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <1112983310.627.1.camel@genius2.i.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1112983310.627.1.camel@genius2.i.cz> X-GPG-Key: http://darklogik.org/pub/pgp/pgp.txt X-Fingerprint: B776 43DC 8A5D EAF9 2126 9A67 A7DA 390F DEFF 9DD1 X-ADDRSpamFilter: Passed, probability (20%) X-ADDRSignature: 1D629D67 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any way to log all process launches? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:45:23 -0000 --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > If you need more detailed information some patches at garage.freebsd.pl > might be interesting - especially lrexec. It may be a bit outdated but > it provides you with the information standard utilities don't. >=20 > Michal Thanks for the interesting link. How much of this is committed to the tree (perhaps -CURRENT)? Quite a few of those patches seem to provide zero-cost security (like the setgid crontab) and I for one would certainly like to see them in FreeBSD in the future... Mark --=20 PGP: http://www.darklogik.org/pub/pgp/pgp.txt B776 43DC 8A5D EAF9 2126 9A67 A7DA 390F DEFF 9DD1 --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iQIVAwUBQlbRJafaOQ/e/53RAQpKsg/9Fgu0y3RDP/5sVqseFSP34Yqg8pMOGkFo MEv0+kyfx41k5PjS2/+PU5R4ah6wOii9LThzIxB5piWV80ynziwgJxE2vTHWpkLV 4F1QqEFX4c0ve2XUpQwASUzTBsbEOUDlmYr1o80oflUxMlp7z62M4AuDa0Kq2ws9 eE/oUixftiO4OmpJ4eLlkJSDx0lEqMuWHR+47wnNAsQ2oYpE16TjxxgKTkCYQkcd WHgSSk+kXMR8PxcQevAnOvRnPJfKFeQxn7ZMMvLeEdn/GgwiaGEe5DuvKOG7w0Fq smNyKJCJE3K1ncD+/Ryvxv2BI8HjPVz2yp3leENBYpEAc+rcDB4wNUnqelsmaeWG kjucUjLnse+l8iZUTBzOMFPNE2ZHqDGwqOYAPiJBX3e8iKsEz9lkOOq89moukSvA 1LmjjHSVSfMr7qvtZJw+uZ1UqnYUR96I/612eQRI/58SS0+WYZ0tLqwtQNoPHY/c tUOtRQ+EhAE+lv+QurNRxkXAPkiuW7r6astijefKwHokJSGJ9oRF+IVHJ4I00kcz luX2o3J5W2VmAe2mQejTr93AGSZtpusmiwlk+j75r0klOFJMe0kxNKmSIfBlM/HE rc2b/sJg9ElTTdHuF+sodB+Mi8eb2iwifqa600zS8ft9JGsGweNkgGKSbZ8UVyJW hxiL6fgqHNg= =O7pg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 18:58:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E371516A4D0 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:58:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (ns1.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EB843D2D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:58:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.tsgincorporated.com [127.0.0.1]) by smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A123CD715; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:58:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 13987-08; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:58:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.tsgincorporated.com (lanmail.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.29]) by smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952DE3CD70B; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:58:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from micheal (micheal.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.77]) by mail.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2278D95293E; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:58:22 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <002401c53c6d$3b84ade0$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: "Aaron Sloan" , References: <4256AE6E.4040403@adtu.org> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:00:27 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tsgincorporated.com Subject: Re: cmpq dl380 server. ipmi bmc question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:58:31 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron Sloan" To: Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 11:16 AM Subject: cmpq dl380 server. ipmi bmc question > > Hello guys and gals, > > > > Does system fan control on a Compaq DL380 ,first edition, have any support? > Sounds like a jet at idle in the machine room. > > I have looked through the acpi and port recomendations I have come > across via google and I'm not having any luck at all. I believe it is supported in Linux > but I don't know how. I can't say I'm any hardware wizard on this kind of thing. > > Update: I installed freeipmi and ipmitool and I'm not having any luck with these apps. > The cli commands are apparently over my head because I haven't been able to get it to work and now my head hurts. > Am I barking up the right tree or just peeing on it? > HP was not terribly helpful. All the recent ROMpaks have been installed. > Thanks, > Aaron > Aaron, are you sure that you're supposed to be able to adjust the fan speed on the 380 from within the OS? The reason that I ask, is that the 330's and 350's have a temp sensor that isn't detected until during post, so there's a few seconds on them that the fans run full on. I'm just curious because if the 380's are set up the same, you may have a faulty sensor. -- Micheal Patterson Senior Communications Systems Engineer 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 19:06:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3ADC16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:06:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ss.eunet.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA46043D45 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:06:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) Received: from localhost.i.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13]) by ss.eunet.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j38J6Imi026252; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:06:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) From: Michal Mertl To: markzero In-Reply-To: <20050408184457.GA7173@logik.ath.cx> References: <0C6023A0-A83B-11D9-B765-000A956EB07E@partners.org> <20050408144104.GA75094@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20050408184457.GA7173@logik.ath.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:06:17 +0200 Message-Id: <1112987177.627.10.camel@genius2.i.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any way to log all process launches? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:06:32 -0000 markzero pí¹e v pá 08. 04. 2005 v 19:44 +0100: > > If you need more detailed information some patches at garage.freebsd.pl > > might be interesting - especially lrexec. It may be a bit outdated but > > it provides you with the information standard utilities don't. > > > > Michal > > Thanks for the interesting link. How much of this is committed to the > tree (perhaps -CURRENT)? Quite a few of those patches seem to provide > zero-cost security (like the setgid crontab) and I for one would > certainly like to see them in FreeBSD in the future... Not much. His GEOM modules, jailfsstat and kern.msgbuf in some form or other as far as I can tell. The author of the patches became FreeBSD committer so you'd better ask him. Lot's of people would love to see some more it the tree. I like and would use mijail and privipc for sure. There were some discussions about the patches on the mailing lists in the past. E.g. everyone likes the idea of privipc but it seems to be almost impossible to do really correctly. Try to ask pjd@freebsd.org. Michal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 19:10:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142D616A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:10:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (ns1.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCF343D41 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:10:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.tsgincorporated.com [127.0.0.1]) by smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8CF3CD70B; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:10:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 14492-09; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:10:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.tsgincorporated.com (lanmail.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.29]) by smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8823CD707; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:10:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from micheal (micheal.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.77]) by mail.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 98401952878; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:10:32 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <004701c53c6e$eeea9fb0$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: "Kirk Strauser" , References: <200504081252.19279.kirk@strauser.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:12:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tsgincorporated.com Subject: Re: Automounting smbfs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:10:38 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kirk Strauser" To: Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 12:52 PM Subject: Automounting smbfs? The built-in amd automounter may work great for NFS, but I increasingly find myself mounting Windows shares and amd doesn't seem to support them. Any suggestions? -- Kirk Strauser Kirk, here's what I did to auto mount my pesky windows shared backup folder prior to having a seperate nfs mount to put them. Configure your share as noauto in /etc/fstab (example) ### SMBFS Mounts # #//username@server/share / smbfs noauto,rw,-N,-I= 0 0 Then, in the root crontab, add this: "@reboot //mbfs.sh" Then, in create a file named mbfs.sh and edit it as such: #!/bin/sh echo " " echo " " echo "mounting smbfs slices..." sleep 5 /sbin/mount /backups Please keep in mind, that this method will require the proper share auth info to be in /etc/nsmb.conf, so protect this file as it holds plain text passwords for your windows systems. Then on system restart, after everything else is accessible and running, cron will launch and remount those drives for you. Hope it helps. -- Micheal Patterson Senior Communications Systems Engineer 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 19:15:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E9216A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:15:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (ns1.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7C343D1F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:15:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.tsgincorporated.com [127.0.0.1]) by smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ADE13CD707; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:15:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 14643-08; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:15:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.tsgincorporated.com (lanmail.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.29]) by smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D463CD715; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:15:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from micheal (micheal.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.77]) by mail.tsgincorporated.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A369795284C; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:15:37 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <006801c53c6f$a4c04e70$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: , References: <4256CC07.1060305@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:17:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tsgincorporated.com Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:15:41 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aperez" To: Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 1:23 PM Subject: Portupgrade problem > Hi > > I am having the following problem when I try to upgrade my ports: > > portupgrade -arR > cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/multimedia/nautilus-media > Port directory not found: multimedia/nautilus-media > !multimedia/nautilus-media (nautilus-media-0.8.0_4) (port directory error) > > I checked in /usr/ports/multimedia and of course there is not such > directory. > > Is there a way I can fix this? > > Thanks > > Is your ports tree current via cvs? If not, I'd update the tree, then rebuild portupgrade and see how that works for you. -- Micheal Patterson Senior Communications Systems Engineer 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 19:23:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBA216A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:23:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0A243D31 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:23:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lannenw@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so519338nzk for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:23:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=GI2rylTXjmgpJoDx90xcaaVL8ly7Yl0MuLvrlyy/WtZWEzCcXifCihOYot1/FeHqtL+BHe5U/ePw3Lv8E8aU+pWgUlCljDD1ypY4n49auORAsfoDlAAOL1BHr4lQN2pQLMKXiIHF1H5Sh38ri9Cvfw1cok8OrKA4ejYFZzghQsE= Received: by 10.36.104.12 with SMTP id b12mr106546nzc; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.97.9 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <810f698a05040812237c05beb8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:23:55 -0700 From: Jeremiah Wulf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050408120045.EE69116A50D@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050408120045.EE69116A50D@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 93, Issue 17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jeremiah Wulf List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:23:56 -0000 On Apr 8, 2005 5:00 AM, freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org wrote: > Send freebsd-questions mailing list submissions to > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > freebsd-questions-owner@freebsd.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of freebsd-questions digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Serial console connection problem (Jonathan Chen) > 2. Re: install.cfg (was RE: & No Subject) (wizlayer) > 3. Re: install.cfg (was RE: & No Subject) (John Meing) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:38:53 +1200 > From: Jonathan Chen > Subject: Re: Serial console connection problem > To: Jani Luukkanen > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <20050408103853.GA6841@osiris.chen.org.nz> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:26:02PM +0300, Jani Luukkanen wrote: > > [...] > > Sorry for confusing explanation. The board has built in serial console > > feature, which you can turn on from bios. This allows you to access the > > machine through serial port no matter in what condition the machine > > would be. (Hanging in the boot-phase or kernel dead) > > > > Option has been set up so that the serial console replaces one of the > > comports. (In this case it would be replacing Com1 in the 5.3 machine) > > 4.10 is of course configured with ordinary serial ports so that it would > > have access to the serial terminal of the other machine. > > > > Might be this is irrelevant but just wondering does BSD need in that > > case some special conf for this purpose or just needs replacing the > > getty settings. (Previously with 4.10 configuration i managed to connect > > through minicom) > > Hmm. This is a different case altogether. I suspect that the 5.3 > kernel is intefering with your BIOS console. You may have to disble > the kernel from recognising the port altogether so that it doesn't get > in the way. > > Cheers. > -- > Jonathan Chen > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jesus saves. > Allah forgives. > Cthulu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich. > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:55:31 -0400 > From: wizlayer > Subject: Re: install.cfg (was RE: & No Subject) > To: John Meing > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <200504080655.32758.wizlayer@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Friday 08 April 2005 02:31 am, John Meing wrote: > > Mike I also tried to use only following line in install.cfg > > (without the rc.conf lines) > > > > command="passwd root" system > > > > which should not has mismatching quote errors (and I tested > > with /stand/sysinstalld and it worked) but it didn't work when > > i put it in install.cfg :(( > > > > John Meing > > > [snip] > > > Okay, but that still doesn't work for the syntax... Going > > > back to > > > > > > your original post: > > > > command="echo sendmail_enable="NONE" >> /etc/rc.conf" > > > > system > > > > > > would at best cause mismatching quote errors (which is what > > > I'm assuming you're getting?) > > > > > > Mike > > hmmm... I googled this list and found the following link (which > may wrap in email): > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-January/031620.html > > I'm thinking perhaps this function through sysinstall isn't > completely implemented yet.... or.... I've just noticed there's > no mention of a shell (hmmmm)... > > Maybe something like: > > # /stand/sysinstall command="sh passwd root" system > > Even though it doesn't seem to work from the command line, I > wonder if the problem isn't something along these lines? Perhaps > putting these commands into a script and then having install.cfg > run the script instead would clear it up. > > (I'm shooting in the dark here, I know... But now I'm curious...) > > Mike > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:10:34 +0700 > From: John Meing > Subject: Re: install.cfg (was RE: & No Subject) > To: wizlayer@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <4f34b68f0504080410283a7d01@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Mike, > > Thanks alot for your suggestion, I'll try to put these lines to a > shell script and try to make install.cfg run them. I'll post results > soon. > > John Meing > > On Apr 8, 2005 5:55 PM, wizlayer wrote: > > On Friday 08 April 2005 02:31 am, John Meing wrote: > > > Mike I also tried to use only following line in install.cfg > > > (without the rc.conf lines) > > > > > > command="passwd root" system > > > > > > which should not has mismatching quote errors (and I tested > > > with /stand/sysinstalld and it worked) but it didn't work when > > > i put it in install.cfg :(( > > > > > > John Meing > > > > > [snip] > > > > Okay, but that still doesn't work for the syntax... Going > > > > back to > > > > > > > > your original post: > > > > > command="echo sendmail_enable="NONE" >> /etc/rc.conf" > > > > > system > > > > > > > > would at best cause mismatching quote errors (which is what > > > > I'm assuming you're getting?) > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > hmmm... I googled this list and found the following link (which > > may wrap in email): > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-January/031620.html > > > > I'm thinking perhaps this function through sysinstall isn't > > completely implemented yet.... or.... I've just noticed there's > > no mention of a shell (hmmmm)... > > > > Maybe something like: > > > > # /stand/sysinstall command="sh passwd root" system > > > > Even though it doesn't seem to work from the command line, I > > wonder if the problem isn't something along these lines? Perhaps > > putting these commands into a script and then having install.cfg > > run the script instead would clear it up. > > > > (I'm shooting in the dark here, I know... But now I'm curious...) > > > > Mike > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > End of freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 93, Issue 17 > ************************************************* > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 19:29:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0616416A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:29:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B7343D48 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:29:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DJz7e-0002R1-EV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:26:30 +0200 Received: from 63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net ([63.224.222.139]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:26:30 +0200 Received: from sergei by 63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:26:30 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Sergei Gnezdov Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:25:28 -0700 Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <4256CC07.1060305@gmail.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: sergei@gnezdov.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:29:28 -0000 On 2005-04-08, Aperez wrote: > Hi > > I am having the following problem when I try to upgrade my ports: > > portupgrade -arR > cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/multimedia/nautilus-media > Port directory not found: multimedia/nautilus-media > !multimedia/nautilus-media (nautilus-media-0.8.0_4) (port directory error) > > I checked in /usr/ports/multimedia and of course there is not such > directory. >From /usr/ports/UPDATING 20050312: AFFECTS: all users who have glib/gtk/gnome libraries installed AUTHOR: ahze@FreeBSD.org and the FreeBSD gnome team Gnome has been upgraded to 2.10 and gtk/glib to 2.6. DO NOT USE portupgrade(1) to update any gnome or gtk or any port that depends on them. Using portupgrade will cause problems and you will have to manually upgrade ports. Please use the gnome_upgrade.sh script from http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/gnome_upgrade.sh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 19:35:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DE316A4D3 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:35:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from galilee.polands.org (CPE-24-208-53-189.new.res.rr.com [24.208.53.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8EA343D1D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:35:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from jericho.polands.org ([172.16.1.35]) by galilee.polands.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j38JZ5oR076272; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:35:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from jericho.polands.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jericho.polands.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j38JZ5oR045957; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:35:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djp@jericho.polands.org) Received: (from djp@localhost) by jericho.polands.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j38JZ5DZ045956; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:35:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djp) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:35:05 -0500 From: Doug Poland To: Micheal Patterson Message-ID: <20050408193504.GF45068@polands.org> References: <4256AE6E.4040403@adtu.org> <002401c53c6d$3b84ade0$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002401c53c6d$3b84ade0$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i cc: Aaron Sloan cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cmpq dl380 server. ipmi bmc question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:35:43 -0000 On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:00:27PM -0500, Micheal Patterson wrote: > From: "Aaron Sloan" To: > > > > > Hello guys and gals, > > > > > > > > Does system fan control on a Compaq DL380 ,first edition, have any > > support? Sounds like a jet at idle in the machine room. > > My DL380 is loud too. But, if it makes you feel any better, you should hear my DL580, it's deafening. > > Aaron, are you sure that you're supposed to be able to adjust the fan speed > on the 380 from within the OS? > That's the real question > The reason that I ask, is that the 330's and 350's have a temp sensor > that isn't detected until during post, so there's a few seconds on > them that the fans run full on. I'm just curious because if the 380's > are set up the same, you may have a faulty sensor. > My DL380 is very loud too. -- Regards, Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 19:47:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C8016A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:47:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from email.web-1hosting.net (mail-node1.web-1hosting.net [63.123.79.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFED443D5C for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:47:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tech@adtu.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by email.web-1hosting.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDA21CD; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:49:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.168.243] (spencer-900-31.iowaone.net [12.167.40.62]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by email.web-1hosting.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32511C9; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:49:53 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4256DFE2.8070106@adtu.org> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:47:46 +0000 From: Aaron Sloan User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050328) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Doug Poland , micheal@tsgincorporated.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4256AE6E.4040403@adtu.org> <002401c53c6d$3b84ade0$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> <20050408193504.GF45068@polands.org> In-Reply-To: <20050408193504.GF45068@polands.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at web-1hosting.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: cmpq dl380 server. ipmi bmc question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:47:59 -0000 Doug Poland wrote: On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:00:27PM -0500, Micheal Patterson wrote: From: "Aaron Sloan" [1] To: [2] Hello guys and gals, Does system fan control on a Compaq DL380 ,first edition, have any support? Sounds like a jet at idle in the machine room. My DL380 is loud too. But, if it makes you feel any better, you should hear my DL580, it's deafening. Aaron, are you sure that you're supposed to be able to adjust the fan speed on the 380 from within the OS? That's the real question The reason that I ask, is that the 330's and 350's have a temp sensor that isn't detected until during post, so there's a few seconds on them that the fans run full on. I'm just curious because if the 380's are set up the same, you may have a faulty sensor. My DL380 is very loud too. There are no support to fan control on first generation of DL/ML Compaq Servers. The control is made by software (M$, Linux and others supported SO) wich control the fan speed. On linux it is implemented as a kernel module and a daemon (no source available for both) so i can't solve this. Luiz I got an anwer from someone in the know. I think I'm just going to find a different solution to the problem. HP isn't excited about releasing the source code so I think I'll just idle the fan with my own hardware based control. Thermostat and a relay. I haven't looked over the wiring of the fan in detail yet but it isn't just 2 or 3 wires. Maybe I should steal the guts out of a 330 or 350? : ) Thanks, Aaron References 1. mailto:tech@adtu.org 2. mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 20:05:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA3316A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:05:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F50843D4C for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:05:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so941420wra for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:04:59 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=h1OaqXFkTy8Is3NjO035rgjxz8FLrzX2LS7VFds9x/2xHv/9ZvnUMiCLfN4ln6K1HHFrQ6VL/kNmENTLMg+qbM/pX9HxEcThhvqVbqaOw0kGkj+IK/fU8ZyK3lsuG+oeOAqQRwURIyyFBRLr9v9HosfkKKgxh4k6A5W712BRNuM= Received: by 10.54.71.17 with SMTP id t17mr278851wra; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:04:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.102.12 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:04:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <57d71000050408130459e5fd26@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:04:58 -0700 From: pete wright To: "WOLOSCHAK, FRANK, JR (FRANK)" In-Reply-To: <17D8724A2A8D9542B2B8AE546B9E5BBC03B0D045@az4315exch001u.phx.lucent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <17D8724A2A8D9542B2B8AE546B9E5BBC03B0D045@az4315exch001u.phx.lucent.com> cc: "questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 X-Windows Config During Installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pete wright List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:05:02 -0000 On Apr 8, 2005 10:00 AM, WOLOSCHAK, FRANK, JR (FRANK) wrote: > > QUESTIONS: > 1) Why doesn't the FreeBSD 5.3 install give configuration options for the X-Windows server and desktop? If you check out the handbook it states that the X installation has been removed from the instalation setup (which frankly is not a big issue for most users IMO due to the fact that few people would want to run X on a server platform which I recon would be a majority of the user base for FreeBSD). In any event they point to directions here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x11.html > > 2) If the answer to #1 is that the "Xorg" implementation doesn't contain these, then please help me find the "easiest" way to setup the Gnome desktop following a new fresh installation. > this should be outlined in the above doc. good luck. -pete -- ~~o0OO0o~~ Pete Wright www.nycbug.org NYC's *BSD User Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 20:07:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208D816A57A for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:07:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A5643D45 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:07:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsdnews@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so941994wra for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:07:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=IS16GSL6N+02DIECknlyJqC7kFGF6ee5ueHS/W/m/9mBwHWJIwnF3kdlKHm2rUBC0wsMWwi2W11LXwqoWRiClNmMwQfLd/esb8ER0azqPoUfxjm8WM9A6tSvcN/d1yk618pwzqveKzyncaytnqO4epeTr36xgfjD4/LSkE8DlMA= Received: by 10.54.50.73 with SMTP id x73mr76857wrx; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.50.43 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8292450b05040813072cc8e89f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:07:38 -0500 From: CHris Rich To: "WOLOSCHAK, FRANK, JR (FRANK)" In-Reply-To: <17D8724A2A8D9542B2B8AE546B9E5BBC03B0D045@az4315exch001u.phx.lucent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <17D8724A2A8D9542B2B8AE546B9E5BBC03B0D045@az4315exch001u.phx.lucent.com> cc: "questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 X-Windows Config During Installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: CHris Rich List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:07:40 -0000 On Apr 8, 2005 12:00 PM, WOLOSCHAK, FRANK, JR (FRANK) wrote: > Good Morning, > > I am having problems installing FreeBSD 5.3. It appears that the installation options do not include: "Configure XFree86 Server" and "Configure XFree86 Desktop". I am aware that version 5.3 now uses "Xorg" vice "Xfree86" as the default X-Windows system. > That is correct Xorg is the new default X window system in 5.3 > I am fluent in several varies of Unix (Solaris, HPUX, Red Hat, SCO), but am new to FreeBSD. When installing FreeBSD 5.0, I was given the 2 above options, and was able to set a Gnome Desktop. > Numerous attempts to install FreeBSD 5.3, I was never given the above options, and although I was eventually able to get a brain-dead Gnome desktop to appear, I couldn't do anything with it. > > QUESTIONS: > 1) Why doesn't the FreeBSD 5.3 install give configuration options for the X-Windows server and desktop? This I don't know the answer to but I'm assumiing it's because Xorg is the new X window system > > 2) If the answer to #1 is that the "Xorg" implementation doesn't contain these, then please help me find the "easiest" way to setup the Gnome desktop following a new fresh installation. Easiest way to set up X is to type at the command prompt when logged in as root: xorgconfig That will start a wizard which will ask questions about your hardware. Be sure to have these answers before you start such as what type of video card...hsync and vert refresh of your monitor. Once the wizard is done it will write a config file to use with X Make sure gnome is installed through sysinstall or through the ports After the configuration is done go into your home directory and edit (or create if it does not exist) .xinitrc and type in for gnome (though I'm unsure so you might want to look this up). gnome-session. > > My intent is to continue playing with FreeBSD, and explore "kick start" here at work. > > Thank you for your help, > > Have A Wonderful Day, > > Ivan > > Frank "Ivan" Woloschak > AG Communication Systems > 623.581.4123 Beeper: 888.235.4081 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 20:13:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28B216A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:13:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53407.mail.yahoo.com (web53407.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 794E443D2D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:13:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wildjeep01@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 16913 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Apr 2005 20:13:55 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=uc71cSWOW5ien33h5MHVYD8gZ6f8jDx036AuhNBG6DT59e2pAlM+H1S0O9TXuALgbFaKxw+NABQnnzmdgn1L80cn4JnvAud40dwCLnvaicDijYrf22r/137q1rw/Ju6rkijpyeSdRp8smjjodbbMtMjvA0oaiWlgt8wLDcccpMk= ; Message-ID: <20050408201355.16911.qmail@web53407.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.65.68.10] by web53407.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:13:55 PDT Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:13:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Ralph To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" , sergei@gnezdov.net In-Reply-To: 6667 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Digital Cameras X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:13:57 -0000 --- "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" wrote: > > On Apr 4, 2005, at 10:28 PM, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > > > Is there a chance to get digital camers working > with FreeBSD? All I > > need is load images from camera using USB port. > > Most digital camera's today implement the USB mass > storage system, so > you should just try and plug the camera in. It may > work! > > Chad > Chad/All, From experience (I have the Canon Digital Rebel) I can say that plugging the camera won't be as simple as plugging in the CFCard into a CFCard reader and then into you USB port as a mass storage device. The Canon requires a bunch of drivers and special software even on the Windows box I copy stuff to. Cheers. Ralph Los Information Security Consultant bOUNDARIEZ [B L O G ~~> http://achilles.boundariez.com/cms] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 20:21:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FEFD16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:21:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2045A43D41 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:21:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.222.227] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.43) id 1DJzzC-000IgJ-BS; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:21:50 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20050408201355.16911.qmail@web53407.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050408201355.16911.qmail@web53407.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Message-Id: <91cfe1f1092d5d152493797a8fcc5869@shire.net> From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:21:49 -0600 To: Ralph X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.161.222.227 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on hobbiton.shire.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1+cvs (built Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:44:05 -0700) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on hobbiton.shire.net) cc: sergei@gnezdov.net cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Digital Cameras X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:21:51 -0000 On Apr 8, 2005, at 2:13 PM, Ralph wrote: > --- "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" > wrote: >> >> On Apr 4, 2005, at 10:28 PM, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: >> >>> Is there a chance to get digital camers working >> with FreeBSD? All I >>> need is load images from camera using USB port. >> >> Most digital camera's today implement the USB mass >> storage system, so >> you should just try and plug the camera in. It may >> work! >> >> Chad >> > > Chad/All, > From experience (I have the Canon Digital Rebel) I > can say that plugging the camera won't be as simple as > plugging in the CFCard into a CFCard reader and then > into you USB port as a mass storage device. The Canon > requires a bunch of drivers and special software even > on the Windows box I copy stuff to. > I don't know about the Rebel, but the Canon 20D SLR can be put into two different modes (using the on camera menus), one of which works like a USB mass storage device (at least when plugged into my OS X computer) and one that does not work like that. (I remove the card and use a reader though). However, most consumer level digital cameras, except the cheapest ones, do act as USB mass storage devices when plugged in. The Digital SLR types may be different. (And some of your special software on windows may be to read RAW files and stuff like that). I have used a Minolta DiIMAGE X and a Sony DSC-T1 myself as USB Mass storage devices (under OS X) and have seen relatives use a Canon consumer level one of some sort. Most of the non-SLR and the non-super-el-cheapo digital cameras work with iPhoto under OS X without special drivers and show up on the desktop (as USB Mass Storage devices). I would assume they should behave the same with FreeBSD. Note that this does not give you any sort of photo management or anything... It is worth a try. Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 20:40:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECEF16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:40:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD68F43D2D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:40:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5620E222404 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:40:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16434-02 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:40:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80A0222403 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:40:51 -0500 (CDT) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:40:46 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200504081252.19279.kirk@strauser.com> <004701c53c6e$eeea9fb0$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> In-Reply-To: <004701c53c6e$eeea9fb0$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart10144804.DZQRBDCSFb"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504081540.50673.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: Automounting smbfs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:40:55 -0000 --nextPart10144804.DZQRBDCSFb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 08 April 2005 14:12, you wrote: > Kirk, =A0here's what I did to auto mount my pesky windows shared backup > folder prior to having a seperate nfs mount to put them. > > Configure your share as noauto in /etc/fstab (example) [...] Out of curiosity, why would you do that instead of just letting FreeBSD=20 mount it automatically (which is what I do now)? The goal I'm trying to accomplish is pushing the same map to multiple=20 machines (eg via LDAP). I never bothered to do that with my NFS mounts,=20 but I'm using the addition of the SMB shares as an excuse to rework the=20 system before it grows much more. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart10144804.DZQRBDCSFb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBCVuxS5sRg+Y0CpvERAqncAJ41hpprHxjrsgK7l5JjPbRHdIvZPwCcDqVg iaGnlxMRKM+JpOuWwwCCW1w= =0/tE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart10144804.DZQRBDCSFb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 20:41:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A177716A4CE; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:41:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shiva.nextrials.com (shiva.nextrials.com [64.81.74.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B8143D1D; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:41:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dannyman@toldme.com) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (mito.sr.nextrials.com [192.168.1.102]) by shiva.nextrials.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906703C2831; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4256EC7A.5060107@toldme.com> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:41:30 -0700 From: Danny Howard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050328) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: (LONG) ATA Benchmark: 5.x Reads Slower than Writes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:41:37 -0000 Hello, BACKGROUND I need to purchase a new system for our developers, for use as a Postgres database test server. Having a RAID, probably RAID1, is desirable for performance and reliability. I have recently set up a system with a gmirror-based software RAID1 on a pair of 250GB ATA drives. I would like to stick with gmirror, because: - We save money on extra hardware. - Since gmirror is part of FreeBSD, maintenance is a lot easier than with a hardware solution. SUMMARY But before I go balls out, I should see how well it compares to hardware RAID. So, I do some benchmarks with bonnie++. Since this simulates create, write and read on thousands of random files, this sounds like a good approximation of what Postgres does. :) I don't have the time and hardware to do very scientific tests, but I have been able to run a series of benchmarks using bonnie++ on some systems I have available to me. The ATA-based gmirror performs extremely well, compared to a few Adaptec RAIDs that we have, EXCEPT that the sequential and random reads are MUCH SLOWER than the hardware solution, and even *slower than the preceding write operations*. This is counter-intuitive, especially since RAID1 implies slowed writes and faster reads. I tried the benchmark on my workstation (single 2.5" IDE in a laptop) and got comparable write-faster-than-read results. DATA I was able to make use of the following test systems. I ran tests in multi-user, but tried to favor times when there wasn't much background activity: mito: (lone 2.5" ATA) 5.4-PRERELEASE CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.50GHz (1495.16-MHz 686-class CPU) atapci0: ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 ad0: 28615MB [58140/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 amun: (gmirror RAID1 2 x WD250GB High Intensity) FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2799.22-MHz 686-class CPU) atapci0: ata2: channel #0 on atapci0 ata3: channel #1 on atapci0 ad4: 238475MB [484521/16/63] at ata2-master SATA150 ad6: 238475MB [484521/16/63] at ata3-master SATA150 atapci1: acd0: CDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 janus: (Adaptec RAID1 2 x 72G 10,000 RPM SCSI) FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2399.33-MHz 686-class CPU) [DUAL] aac0: mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci2 aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 48MB cache memory, optional battery present aac0: Kernel 4.0-0, Build 6011, S/N baec64 aac0: Supported Options=1f7e aacd0: on aac0 aacd0: 69998MB (143357184 sectors) db2: (Adaptec RAID10 4 x 36G 15,000 RPM SCSI) FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (3065.81-MHz 686-class CPU) [DUAL] aac0: mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff irq 18 at device 2.0 on pci5 aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 48MB cache memory, optional battery present aac0: Kernel 4.0-0, Build 6008, S/N b97ce8 aac0: Supported Options=1f7e aacp0: on aac0 The raw data can be viewed at http://dannyman.toldme.com/scratch/benchmarks/ ANALYSIS Unfortunately, my hardware RAIDs are on FreeBSD 4, and gmirror is on 5. My hardware RAIDs are on dual CPU systems, with 2G RAM, and my gmirror is on a single hyperthreaded CPU with 512M. Yes, sorry, not especially scientific. Maybe the changes in FreeBSD make a big difference? Maybe RAM makes a big difference? The first results show a serious advantage for the gmirror setup: Sequential output (char) gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 320K/s Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 222K/s Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 202K/s Sequential input (char) gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 617K/s Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 345K/s Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 336K/s Sequential Output (block) gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 37893K/s Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 13829K/s Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 40440K/s The gmirror sees slightly poorer performance in random seeks: Rndom Seeks gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 4144/s Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 5428/s Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 13302/s That all sounds great if I was streaming video, but I want to run a database, opening and closing, reading, writing, and rewriting several small files. This is where things seem to go rotten. We see the ATA performance go to heck on the File Create tests: Sequential Create laptop 2.5" ATA: avg 101/s gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 365/s Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 160/s Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 412/s Sequential Read laptop 2.5" ATA: avg 76/s # SLOWER than write! gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 251/s # SLOWER than write! Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 7862/s Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 7618/s Random Create laptop 2.5" ATA: avg 124/s gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 354/s Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 155/s Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 504/s Random Read laptop 2.5" ATA: avg 57/s # SLOWER than write! gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 144/s # SLOWER than write! Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 7655/s Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 7413/s CONFUSION Now, I could explain poor read performance by: - Less RAM == Less buffer - Bigger Disks == Slower Seeks - Less CPU == ??? I DO have a 4.8-STABLE with a single IDE disk, no Soft Updates, and faster read than write: Version 1.93c ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create-------- anubis.xxxxxxxxxxxx -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- files:max /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP 10:104884:0/5 183 32 1739 97 502 16 176 32 1624 94 368 13 Latency 707ms 11487us 32824us 488ms 207ms 117ms However, seeing read SLOWER than write ... I have to wonder if something fishy is going on. Suggestions? Ideas? I'm fresh out, at the moment. My suspicion is that something in 5.x is out-of-tune!? Thanks a lot. Sincerely, -danny -- http://dannyman.toldme.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 21:18:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5460C16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:18:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA4443D41 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:18:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from meschoyez@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1171096wri for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:18:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=egc8T5xxUavtrs9hpqnkM61CKgnC1HNfEQ7I86NwkVNpJxvtt3ogZ7sjh1b8pvFfVIGc4bpS123vSh/iAg5tLsGT4JyJKV1J8v60lL3xVieOCwVT06nLryw6g4eTGajzwLQsjUI2GUpRlLLwbx7qxToWw7B7wBxoplrUWLFbX0M= Received: by 10.54.14.44 with SMTP id 44mr135375wrn; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:18:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.65.13 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:18:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7a5722d005040814183dc9a7b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:18:30 -0300 From: Maximiliano Eschoyez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <7a5722d0050401082068f2c34c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7a5722d0050401082068f2c34c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: 5.3 not accepting connections - What I'm missing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Maximiliano Eschoyez List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:18:32 -0000 Dear all, I've recently moved from FreeBSD 4.8 to 5.3. After the upgrade, I found that my computer doesn't accept outside connections anymore. The problem is: I can't connect to my computer through different services (FTP, Telnet, SSH, etc.) and also, I can't redirect X output to my display. I've verified that the corresponding daemons are running and that all the steps to X redirection are done, but nothing happens. I'm not using a firewall. Looking deeply into the problem, I've found that also my computer doesn't reply to ping request. But changing the kernel variable 'net.inet.icmp.bmcastecho' it started to work. There is something I have to change to accept connections that I didn't notice? I think that this problem is related to security reasons, but I didn't find how to open a little bit my computer. Summarizing: from my computer, I can connect to any other machine, but I can't do the opposite connections. I hope someone could help me. Thanks in advance, M@X From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 21:25:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB1616A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:25:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A18343D31 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:25:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 23:25:53 +0200 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 23:25:53 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20050408212553.GA24559@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <48a5f32a0504080626383f5441@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: Dick Hoogendijk Subject: Re: IPF Firewall Rules... help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:25:56 -0000 On 08 Apr bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > If you read the limewire website carefully you will see that no where > does it say it will work on PC on a local area network (LAN). This is > one of those products that buries the sending IP address in the > packets. A PC on the LAN uses an NATed ip address and this product can > not handle that. This is a common problem with products such as this. Are you saying here that limewire does /not/ run on clients on a NATted local area network? If so, how come then that limewire runs on my windows client, as well as on my OS-X and FreeBSD clients? All NATted of course. > It's just not designed to work on PC that is on a LAN. It works like a charme for me though. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 21:27:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AE616A4CF for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:27:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263B643D45 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:27:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a156.otenet.gr [212.205.215.156]) j38LQht3002855; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 00:26:43 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j38LRcaw089431; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 00:27:38 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j38LRbgw089416; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 00:27:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 00:27:37 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Maximiliano Eschoyez Message-ID: <20050408212737.GA87241@gothmog.gr> References: <7a5722d0050401082068f2c34c@mail.gmail.com> <7a5722d005040814183dc9a7b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7a5722d005040814183dc9a7b@mail.gmail.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3 not accepting connections - What I'm missing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:27:43 -0000 On 2005-04-08 18:18, Maximiliano Eschoyez wrote: > Dear all, > > I've recently moved from FreeBSD 4.8 to 5.3. After the upgrade, I > found that my computer doesn't accept outside connections anymore. Are you using ipfw, ipfilter or pf as a firewall? If yes, what rules do you use? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 21:34:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859F716A4CE; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:34:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prosporo.hedron.org (hedron.org [66.11.182.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87ED643D1D; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:34:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ean@hedron.org) Received: from localhost.hedron.org (localhost.hedron.org [127.0.0.1]) by prosporo.hedron.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9DEC118; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:34:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Ean Kingston To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:34:02 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <4256EC7A.5060107@toldme.com> In-Reply-To: <4256EC7A.5060107@toldme.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504081734.03403.ean@hedron.org> cc: Danny Howard cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (LONG) ATA Benchmark: 5.x Reads Slower than Writes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:34:03 -0000 On April 8, 2005 04:41 pm, Danny Howard wrote: > Hello, > > BACKGROUND > > I need to purchase a new system for our developers, for use as a > Postgres database test server. Having a RAID, probably RAID1, is > desirable for performance and reliability. I have recently set up a > system with a gmirror-based software RAID1 on a pair of 250GB ATA > drives. I would like to stick with gmirror, because: > > - We save money on extra hardware. > - Since gmirror is part of FreeBSD, maintenance is a lot easier than > with a hardware solution. > > SUMMARY > > But before I go balls out, I should see how well it compares to hardware > RAID. So, I do some benchmarks with bonnie++. Since this simulates > create, write and read on thousands of random files, this sounds like a > good approximation of what Postgres does. :) > > I don't have the time and hardware to do very scientific tests, but I > have been able to run a series of benchmarks using bonnie++ on some > systems I have available to me. The ATA-based gmirror performs > extremely well, compared to a few Adaptec RAIDs that we have, EXCEPT > that the sequential and random reads are MUCH SLOWER than the hardware > solution, and even *slower than the preceding write operations*. This > is counter-intuitive, especially since RAID1 implies slowed writes and > faster reads. I tried the benchmark on my workstation (single 2.5" IDE > in a laptop) and got comparable write-faster-than-read results. May I suggest that you turn softupdates off and sync on for the filesystems you are testing. If you don't you are not really testing the hardware. You are testing the FreeBSD disk caching system in the kernel. > DATA > > I was able to make use of the following test systems. I ran tests in > multi-user, but tried to favor times when there wasn't much background > activity: > > mito: (lone 2.5" ATA) > 5.4-PRERELEASE > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.50GHz (1495.16-MHz 686-class CPU) > atapci0: > ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 > ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 > ad0: 28615MB [58140/16/63] at ata0-master > UDMA100 > > amun: (gmirror RAID1 2 x WD250GB High Intensity) > FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2799.22-MHz 686-class CPU) > atapci0: > ata2: channel #0 on atapci0 > ata3: channel #1 on atapci0 > ad4: 238475MB [484521/16/63] at > ata2-master SATA150 > ad6: 238475MB [484521/16/63] at > ata3-master SATA150 > atapci1: > acd0: CDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 > > janus: (Adaptec RAID1 2 x 72G 10,000 RPM SCSI) > FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2399.33-MHz 686-class CPU) [DUAL] > aac0: mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff irq 16 at > device 1.0 on pci2 > aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 48MB cache memory, optional battery present > aac0: Kernel 4.0-0, Build 6011, S/N baec64 > aac0: Supported > Options=1f7eOND,SGMAP64,ALARM,NONDASD> aacd0: on aac0 > aacd0: 69998MB (143357184 sectors) > > db2: (Adaptec RAID10 4 x 36G 15,000 RPM SCSI) > FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (3065.81-MHz 686-class CPU) [DUAL] > aac0: mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff irq 18 at > device 2.0 on pci5 > aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 48MB cache memory, optional battery present > aac0: Kernel 4.0-0, Build 6008, S/N b97ce8 > aac0: Supported > Options=1f7eOND,SGMAP64,ALARM,NONDASD> aacp0: on aac0 > > The raw data can be viewed at > http://dannyman.toldme.com/scratch/benchmarks/ > > ANALYSIS > > Unfortunately, my hardware RAIDs are on FreeBSD 4, and gmirror is on 5. > My hardware RAIDs are on dual CPU systems, with 2G RAM, and my gmirror > is on a single hyperthreaded CPU with 512M. Yes, sorry, not especially > scientific. Maybe the changes in FreeBSD make a big difference? Maybe > RAM makes a big difference? > > The first results show a serious advantage for the gmirror setup: > > Sequential output (char) > gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 320K/s > Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 222K/s > Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 202K/s > > Sequential input (char) > gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 617K/s > Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 345K/s > Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 336K/s > > Sequential Output (block) > gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 37893K/s > Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 13829K/s > Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 40440K/s > > The gmirror sees slightly poorer performance in random seeks: > > Rndom Seeks > gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 4144/s > Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 5428/s > Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 13302/s > > That all sounds great if I was streaming video, but I want to run a > database, opening and closing, reading, writing, and rewriting several > small files. This is where things seem to go rotten. > > We see the ATA performance go to heck on the File Create tests: > > Sequential Create > laptop 2.5" ATA: avg 101/s > gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 365/s > Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 160/s > Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 412/s > > Sequential Read > laptop 2.5" ATA: avg 76/s # SLOWER than write! > gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 251/s # SLOWER than write! > Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 7862/s > Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 7618/s > > Random Create > laptop 2.5" ATA: avg 124/s > gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 354/s > Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 155/s > Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 504/s > > Random Read > laptop 2.5" ATA: avg 57/s # SLOWER than write! > gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 144/s # SLOWER than write! > Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 7655/s > Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 7413/s > > CONFUSION > > Now, I could explain poor read performance by: > - Less RAM == Less buffer > - Bigger Disks == Slower Seeks > - Less CPU == ??? > > I DO have a 4.8-STABLE with a single IDE disk, no Soft Updates, and > faster read than write: > > Version 1.93c ------Sequential Create------ --------Random > Create-------- > anubis.xxxxxxxxxxxx -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- > -Delete-- > files:max /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP > /sec %CP > 10:104884:0/5 183 32 1739 97 502 16 176 32 1624 94 > 368 13 > Latency 707ms 11487us 32824us 488ms 207ms > 117ms > > However, seeing read SLOWER than write ... I have to wonder if something > fishy is going on. Suggestions? Ideas? I'm fresh out, at the moment. > My suspicion is that something in 5.x is out-of-tune!? > > Thanks a lot. > > Sincerely, > -danny -- Ean Kingston E-Mail: ean AT hedron DOT org URL: http://www.hedron.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 21:58:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4A616A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:58:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCAE43D2F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:58:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from meschoyez@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so192200wra for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:58:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=bEm9uaZLY7bnn5eXx/5gZc/ZSVEXbg54CBAtLzQQ1TVK0ZTFq1Ya9rZs+heUwk7wKIwWhjiFKDnE7XLUfZtK5DG8zedBhwxJD+ygcAOzfOxlh5aHlXTryI6FWdu/VpvOgdoMs/XzBwd3YdQlAWB5qckAa27LOTXFIsjg8yk4LO0= Received: by 10.54.46.7 with SMTP id t7mr1754453wrt; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.65.13 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7a5722d0050408145818c6e5e5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:58:51 -0300 From: Maximiliano Eschoyez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050408212737.GA87241@gothmog.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7a5722d0050401082068f2c34c@mail.gmail.com> <7a5722d005040814183dc9a7b@mail.gmail.com> <20050408212737.GA87241@gothmog.gr> Subject: Re: 5.3 not accepting connections - What I'm missing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Maximiliano Eschoyez List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:58:52 -0000 On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 00:27:37 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-04-08 18:18, Maximiliano Eschoyez wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I've recently moved from FreeBSD 4.8 to 5.3. After the upgrade, I > > found that my computer doesn't accept outside connections anymore. > > Are you using ipfw, ipfilter or pf as a firewall? If yes, what > rules do you use? No, I'm not using any firewall. Also, I tried enabling a firewall through rc.conf with the parameters firewall_enable="YES" firewall_type="open" but nothing changed. :-( It's very strange because I'm not using any filtering policy. Thanks. M@X From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 22:45:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41AE16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:45:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEC043D39 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:45:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:43:13 -0500 Message-ID: <4257097A.8070002@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:45:14 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kirk Strauser References: <200504081252.19279.kirk@strauser.com> <004701c53c6e$eeea9fb0$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> <200504081540.50673.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <200504081540.50673.kirk@strauser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Apr 2005 22:43:14.0070 (UTC) FILETIME=[5944DB60:01C53C8C] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Automounting smbfs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 22:45:17 -0000 Kirk Strauser wrote: >On Friday 08 April 2005 14:12, you wrote: > > > >>Kirk, here's what I did to auto mount my pesky windows shared backup >>folder prior to having a seperate nfs mount to put them. >> >>Configure your share as noauto in /etc/fstab (example) >> >> > >[...] > >Out of curiosity, why would you do that instead of just letting FreeBSD >mount it automatically (which is what I do now)? > > > I'm assuming that it's a minor league paranoid measure to ensure that, in the event the windows host(s) are unavailable, you don't hang up the boot process somehow. That's what it is for *me*, anyhow. (I don't even list smbfs shares in /etc/fstab....) AFAIK, it would just delay booting a bit, but IANAE. That's why I do it from cron, anyway; that, and because I learned about cron long before I learned about rc scripts... >The goal I'm trying to accomplish is pushing the same map to multiple >machines (eg via LDAP). I never bothered to do that with my NFS mounts, >but I'm using the addition of the SMB shares as an excuse to rework the >system before it grows much more. > > I'm no help there, I'm afraid. I do have scripts now that do my post-install configuration, and might be tweaked to "push out" smbfs mounts (via cron, as mentioned above), but that's about it...nothing so complex as LDAP. :) Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 23:01:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF0616A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 23:01:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6989743D39 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 23:01:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:59:49 -0500 Message-ID: <42570D5E.8040904@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:01:50 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wendell Hatcher References: <20050408174657.55523.qmail@web30807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050408174657.55523.qmail@web30807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Apr 2005 22:59:50.0211 (UTC) FILETIME=[AB03E930:01C53C8E] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetch ports timedout X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 23:01:53 -0000 Wendell Hatcher wrote: >Hello, > >I have a slight problem with the 5.3 release and I >checked all of your documentation,mailing,lists and on >the web before coming to you. My problem is when I go >into any port under the /usr/ports/directory and try >building that port using make it times out. The only >port that would build was the cvsup port and I used it >to make my ports tree current so I know it is up to >date. But when I go into a port make clean and make >install none of the ports seem to work its goes out to >fetch /ftp.XXXX and times out. I use a qwest dsl modem >and I do not have a firewall setup but even if I did >where would I make the changes neccessary for fetch to >go out and download the ports. I can goto the >sysinstall section and download ports and any data >from any ftp site but when I try and do the same thing >from the ports section it times out or when I try and >use pkg_add the fecth keeps timing out. > > > Well, I don't know that we've enough specific information above to give a specific diagnosis. Can you surf/ping/telnet external hosts by name? What's in your environment that might affect fetch? Can you use ftp? (e.g...:) $ ftp ftp> open ftp.freebsd.org Trying 62.243.72.50... Connected to ftp.freebsd.org. 220-ftp.FreeBSD.org NcFTPd Server (licensed copy) ready. 220-The FreeBSD mirror at TDC, in Aarhus, Denmark, Europe 220- 220-Contact: beastie@tdk.net 220-Use wisely. Name (ftp.freebsd.org:test): anonymous 331 Guest login ok, send your complete e-mail address as password. Password: 230-You are user #121 of 450 simultaneous users allowed. 230- 230 Logged in anonymously. Remote system type is UNIX. Using binary mode to transfer files. ftp> ls 150 Data connection accepted from 19.207.11.50:57528; transfer starting. drwxr-xr-x 3 ftpuser ftpusers 512 May 13 2001 pub rwxrwxrwx 3 ftpuser ftpuser 85 Apr 5 3004 README 226 Listing completed. ftp> get README 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for 'README' (85 bytes). 100% |*******************************************************************| 85 501.56 KB/s 00:00 ETA 226 Transfer complete. 85 bytes received in 00:00 (501.56 KB/s) ftp> Just some thoughts... Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 23:39:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8939216A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 23:39:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF62A43D2F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 23:39:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.150?) (mjeays2551@24.114.152.139 with plain) by smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2005 23:39:15 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: Fridtjof Busse In-Reply-To: <20050408183249.505119b7.fbusse@gmx.de> References: <20050408183249.505119b7.fbusse@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1113003554.817.2.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:39:14 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox won't start X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 23:39:16 -0000 On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 12:32, Fridtjof Busse wrote: > Hi > I just installed FreeBSD 5.4RC, everything works so fine. > Just firefox won't work (running xfce), neither the package nor the > port. I can only start it as root, under a normal user nothing happens > at all. /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox quits after a second and no firefox. > How can I fix this? > Thanks. At a guess, you may have created some configuration files owned by root the first time you started it. Try hunting them down and deleting them, and start firefox from a user account again. Also try running firefox from a command line in an xterm, if you haven't already done so, and see if there are any helpful error messages. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 23:44:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808C116A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 23:44:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB4A843D46 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 23:44:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.150?) (mjeays2551@24.114.152.139 with plain) by smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2005 23:44:36 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: Ralph In-Reply-To: <20050408201355.16911.qmail@web53407.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050408201355.16911.qmail@web53407.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1113003874.817.6.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:44:35 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: sergei@gnezdov.net cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Subject: Re: Digital Cameras X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 23:44:37 -0000 On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:13, Ralph wrote: > --- "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" > wrote: > > > > On Apr 4, 2005, at 10:28 PM, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > > > > > Is there a chance to get digital camers working > > with FreeBSD? All I > > > need is load images from camera using USB port. > > > > Most digital camera's today implement the USB mass > > storage system, so > > you should just try and plug the camera in. It may > > work! > > > > Chad > > > > Chad/All, > From experience (I have the Canon Digital Rebel) I > can say that plugging the camera won't be as simple as > plugging in the CFCard into a CFCard reader and then > into you USB port as a mass storage device. The Canon > requires a bunch of drivers and special software even > on the Windows box I copy stuff to. > > Cheers. > > Ralph Los > Information Security Consultant > bOUNDARIEZ > > [B L O G ~~> http://achilles.boundariez.com/cms] > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" gphoto2 appears to support the Digital Rebel; here is a snippet from gphoto2 --list-cameras: "Canon EOS Digital Rebel (normal mode)" "Canon EOS Digital Rebel (PTP mode)" Unfortunately, I don't have the luxury of one to test it with... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 02:02:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A4616A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 02:02:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3887A43D1F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 02:02:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:00:27 -0500 Message-ID: <425737B3.4090709@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:02:27 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gabpaul@melbpc.org.au References: <20050406113401.GA33178@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <20050406122721.GA33679@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <4253F42F.5010105@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Apr 2005 02:00:28.0023 (UTC) FILETIME=[E6DAC870:01C53CA7] cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: difficulty installing 5.3-R i386 - how to check RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 02:02:31 -0000 Gabrielle Harrison & Paul van den Bergen wrote: > OK, thanks for the info... now for the solution... > > I have more than 16 MB of ram available but it does nto seem to > play well together or there is a problem with some of the chips. > > How do I trouble shoot my RAM chips? for instance, if I swap the > 2 SIMMs I have in there atm it does not want to do the POST. is > POST success sufficient to conclude that the chips are OK? > is there a BSD utility to check or diagnose RAM condition or errors? > > (ahhh the joys of old hardware...) > *g*, Yeah. I've got piles of it. Some of them are my primary DNS/web machines, :-p As to the question -- Hmm, what should I say? (1st, a parenthetical observation --- the FBSD list doesn't like "top posting" much, and you forgot to cc: the list: many people request that you keep all this discussion _on_ the list for a couple of reasons. However, you're probably new to all this; consider forgiveness extended, but try to play nicer next time? Nothing personal, you understand ... just a "heads up" for the future....) The standard answer for "RAM issues" is to download the program "memtest86", which is available for most any computing platform. (e.g., it's OS independent once you create the floppy disk). Running this program will create a bootable floppy disk that you stick in the box, boot into, and it runs tests all day long until you shut it down. I believe you want http://www.memtest.org IIRC, you may be able to get a log/report from it, so you don't have to sit there through $n iterations of the test and watch the screen for errors, but YMMV. As for mixing chips, it's been a long, long time, and I was more like a "hobbyist" then (maybe still am), but I do seem to remember it was a "no no" to mix EDO and FP chips, or some such, blah blah.... HTH, Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 02:26:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34F516A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 02:26:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6458E43D39 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 02:26:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neonski24@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so231984wra for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:26:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=luvn6hnafI6mhbw0T+BHsGOUNNgv/L07AmQzQTNAvseksvfaQS3/B7ZMxJwg2RZKXBNOOFUm0L0uXaMCJES4jN1NlWPm/sEaBwyAB+oYEJ5mout/ozcK6xEiHIejlyRNpZlq/q5t35+oIZZXH+AmR9GXNEyCN9sj3irkQ9YwqU0= Received: by 10.54.2.60 with SMTP id 60mr1435507wrb; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:26:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.44.55 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:26:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:26:17 +0800 From: neon abelgas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: cdrom jail help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: neon abelgas List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 02:26:18 -0000 Is there any way to access my cdrom inside the jail? thank's in advance! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 03:16:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F86C16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 03:16:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from msr20.hinet.net (msr20.hinet.net [168.95.4.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC8C43D41 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 03:16:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net) Received: from sonic.utopia.com (61-223-164-189.dynamic.hinet.net [61.223.164.189]) by msr20.hinet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA04836 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:16:50 +0800 (CST) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:19:59 +0800 From: Robert Storey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050409111959.20e74ca4.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: change log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 03:16:54 -0000 Hi all, Sorry to be asking such a dumb question, but I'm looking for the changelog for FBSD 5.4 and I haven't been able to find it (even after lots of Googling). Could anybody point me to the correct web page? TIA, Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 03:49:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C7716A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 03:49:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFB343D46 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 03:49:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 06022512F0; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:49:02 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Robert Storey Message-ID: <20050409034902.GA85371@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050409111959.20e74ca4.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050409111959.20e74ca4.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: change log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 03:49:04 -0000 --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 11:19:59AM +0800, Robert Storey wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > Sorry to be asking such a dumb question, but I'm looking for the > changelog for FBSD 5.4 and I haven't been able to find it (even after > lots of Googling). Could anybody point me to the correct web page? I don't know of a webpage (the amount of data involved would be truly enormous), but you can browse the CVS mailing list archives: http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/current/cvs-all.html and also check out the CVSROOT/commitlogs/ directory available via cvsup. kris --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCV1CuWry0BWjoQKURAtejAJ9Zld7FXM+VTTtHZt+GPqcKTi+UUACgh7Ks X5Vfo5vJZZtLBLqhMXpVNU0= =F2Ux -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 03:52:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9881816A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 03:52:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9E143D41 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 03:52:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:50:15 -0500 Message-ID: <42575170.4040001@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 22:52:16 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Storey References: <20050409111959.20e74ca4.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> In-Reply-To: <20050409111959.20e74ca4.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Apr 2005 03:50:16.0492 (UTC) FILETIME=[3DE35EC0:01C53CB7] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: change log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 03:52:19 -0000 Robert Storey wrote: >Hi all, > >Sorry to be asking such a dumb question, but I'm looking for the >changelog for FBSD 5.4 and I haven't been able to find it (even after >lots of Googling). Could anybody point me to the correct web page? > >TIA, >Robert > No announcement has been made; 5.4 has not been -RELEASED, ergo, no change log. There does seem to be a mention of 5.4-BETA1 ... but AFAICT this is not a RELEASE and the web page will not be updated, per se.* http://freebsd.org/news/newsflash.html The entire CVS tree is available for viewing; this can give you exact detail into changes as they are being made: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ Finally, you can see that 5.4-RELEASE is scheduled to be announced on April 26th at: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/schedule.html This page also gives an approximate timeline for many related activities, including updating the web page, etc. HTH, Kevin Kinsey *AAMOF, it appears that re@ is now calling what were heretofore known as "PRELEASE"s as "BETAn"s, now.... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 04:26:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A8016A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:26:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vscan41.melbpc.org.au (eagle.melbpc.org.au [203.12.152.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C8743D41 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:26:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabpaul@numbat.melbpc.org.au) Received: from virusscan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vscan41.melbpc.org.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 53A76A0C0 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 14:26:50 +1000 (EST) Received: from vscan41.melbpc.org.au ([127.0.0.1]) by eagle.melbpc.org.au ([203.12.152.41]) with SMTP (gateway) id A015184A5C3; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 14:26:50 +1000 Received: by vscan41.melbpc.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 0EACCA2E2; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 14:26:50 +1000 (EST) Received: from a2-46.melbpc.org.au (a2-46.melbpc.org.au [203.12.157.46]) by vscan41.melbpc.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722FB9FF5; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 14:26:46 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 14:26:43 +1000 To: "Kevin Kinsey" References: <20050406113401.GA33178@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <20050406122721.GA33679@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <4253F42F.5010105@daleco.biz> <425737B3.4090709@daleco.biz> From: "Gabrielle Harrison & Paul van den Bergen" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <425737B3.4090709@daleco.biz> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.50 (Win32, build 3778) X-Filtered-With: renattach 1.2.1 X-RenAttach-Info: mode=badlist action=rename count=0 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: difficulty installing 5.3-R i386 - how to check RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: gabpaul@melbpc.org.au List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 04:26:54 -0000 On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:02:27 -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Gabrielle Harrison & Paul van den Bergen wrote: > >> OK, thanks for the info... now for the solution... >> >> I have more than 16 MB of ram available but it does nto seem to >> play well together or there is a problem with some of the chips. >> >> How do I trouble shoot my RAM chips? for instance, if I swap the >> 2 SIMMs I have in there atm it does not want to do the POST. is >> POST success sufficient to conclude that the chips are OK? is there a >> BSD utility to check or diagnose RAM condition or errors? >> >> (ahhh the joys of old hardware...) >> > > *g*, Yeah. I've got piles of it. Some of them are > my primary DNS/web machines, :-p > > As to the question -- Hmm, what should I say? yeah... which turned out to be my saviour... I dug out an old pile of MBs... which still had there mem chips intact, now have 98 MB in the machine, loading happily as I typo... > (1st, a parenthetical observation --- the FBSD list doesn't like > "top posting" much, and you forgot to cc: the list: many people > request that you keep all this discussion _on_ the list for a couple > of reasons. However, you're probably new to all this; consider > forgiveness extended, but try to play nicer next time? Nothing > personal, you understand ... just a "heads up" for the future....) No problems, thanks for the headsup... Not intentional, just used to lists that do auto-reply-to as default... :-) but I guess this is flame war material here... personally I have found top posting more useable as I tend to scan the email top first to see if I want to read... I can see the point though, in-line or bottom post presumably being prefered for some reason ;-) guess it's a style thing, one that I'm not fussed by, so I'll tow the line... > > The standard answer for "RAM issues" is to download the > program "memtest86", which is available for most any > computing platform. (e.g., it's OS independent once > you create the floppy disk). Running this program will create > a bootable floppy disk that you stick in the box, boot > into, and it runs tests all day long until you shut it down. > > I believe you want http://www.memtest.org > > IIRC, you may be able to get a log/report from it, so > you don't have to sit there through $n iterations of > the test and watch the screen for errors, but YMMV. > > As for mixing chips, it's been a long, long time, and I > was more like a "hobbyist" then (maybe still am), but > I do seem to remember it was a "no no" to mix EDO > and FP chips, or some such, blah blah.... > > HTH, > > Kevin Kinsey ta! that looks just what I want... Knowing the hardware is fine goes a long way to solving bugs ;-) -- ########## Paul van den Bergen, #### # Gabrielle Harrison # # # & Anja van den Bergen # #### # 848 High Street Rd #### # # Glen Waverley VIC 3150 Australia # ###### gabpaul@melbpc.org.au # # ph: +613 9886 3160 ##### mob: 042 886 3160 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 04:43:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A887F16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:43:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from excalibur.fbunet.de (excalibur.fbunet.de [80.190.243.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307C943D1D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:43:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbusse@gmx.de) Received: from artus.fbunet.de (port-212-202-40-81.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.40.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by excalibur.fbunet.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C8419073 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 06:43:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 06:43:29 +0200 From: Fridtjof Busse To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050409064329.3439161f.fbusse@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <1113003554.817.2.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> References: <20050408183249.505119b7.fbusse@gmx.de> <1113003554.817.2.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.7 (GTK+ 2.6.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Firefox won't start X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 04:43:31 -0000 * Mike Jeays : > > I just installed FreeBSD 5.4RC, everything works so fine. > > Just firefox won't work (running xfce), neither the package nor the > > port. I can only start it as root, under a normal user nothing > > happens at all. /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox quits after a second and no > > firefox. How can I fix this? > > Thanks. > > At a guess, you may have created some configuration files owned by > root the first time you started it. Try hunting them down and > deleting them, and start firefox from a user account again. At first run, I tried to start firefox under the local user of course. When that wouldn't work , I searched Google and found an old bug about similiar behavior that suggested running firefox as root the first time. Didn't help, so I'm stuck since it's uite some time I used FreeBSD. > Also try running firefox from a command line in an xterm, if you > haven't already done so, and see if there are any helpful error > messages. I'm starting it from commandline. It doesn't print any errors and exits after a second. Under root, it starts and gives me debugging messages. -- Fridtjof Busse BOFH Excuse #122: because Bill Gates is a Jehovah's witness and so nothing can work on St. Swithin's day. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 05:36:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99E716A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 05:36:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF2443D1F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 05:36:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fadeaway@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1233724wri for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 22:36:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:to:message-id:content-type:from:subject:date:x-mailer; b=kokzY6q406O49uadCSpKk2yKuchsy2dFRSWPbwAHn24otKOJygl0Qq3XVgrXREqFOz3HyjaKWicJAKDhNZuAkqP3Lm+0030jblbCvZ+xdBq+ccyESG7RAdXvXgZCxiVmyDawZFxSUNUyS7wv2zR3evjBYWER9neTJC1ftzyYH60= Received: by 10.54.55.61 with SMTP id d61mr644927wra; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 22:36:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.3.100? ([68.161.45.167]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id d61sm892761wra.2005.04.08.22.36.58; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 22:36:58 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <9603522236e10dbddacdb000cb7e8c08@gmail.com> From: fadeaway@gmail.com Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 01:36:57 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: segfaults when building world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 05:36:59 -0000 I am having problems building world off a fresh install of FreeBSD 5.3 I cvsup'd the src from cvsup2.freebsd.org with the tag 'releng_5_3'. Also tried and removed the entire src dir and cvsup'd again from cvs3.freebsd.org with the same tag... hoping it might just be a corrupt src I grabbed the first time. Other than the segfault errors the system has also hung once while attempting to build world. and another time while `make cleandir` in /usr/src to prepare for another attempt. One thing to note, when I buildworld it will exit at different points. I also confirmed this with doing `time make buildworld`, the time changes with each attempt as well. My make.conf contains... "CFLAGS= -O -pipe" "NO_BLUETOOTH= true" "NO_SENDMAIL= true" "NOPROFILE= true " I've also tried a default make.conf file and some variations with my make.conf but still nothing... I've tried `make buildworld` or `make -j4 buildworld` as suggested by the handbook. Each new attempt I always... # chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/usr # rm -rf /usr/obj/usr # cd /usr/src # make cleandir I would do `make cleandir` twice as suggested by someone just to be sure I googled a bit and from what i gathered it could be a hardware issue... Seems about right, request a tech @ the datacenter where the server is located to run 'memtest'. Reported fine... I was sure it was a hardware issue, now I am completely out of options! If anyone has -any- suggestions at all please let me know! A copy of one of the segfault errors while doing make buildworld: --------------------------------------------- ./contrib/gcc -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/config -DGENERATOR_FILE -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/include -c /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/genmodes.c /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/genmodes.c: In function `emit_insn_modes_c_header': /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/genmodes.c: 836: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See for instructions. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. _______________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 05:46:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9357416A4CF for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 05:46:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79B943D2D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 05:46:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1379C60E4; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 00:46:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13900-06; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 00:46:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B48E60DB; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 00:46:38 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <42576C2D.1000604@makeworld.com> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:46:21 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050327) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fadeaway@gmail.com References: <9603522236e10dbddacdb000cb7e8c08@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9603522236e10dbddacdb000cb7e8c08@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: segfaults when building world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 05:46:46 -0000 fadeaway@gmail.com wrote: > I am having problems building world off a fresh install of FreeBSD 5.3 > > I cvsup'd the src from cvsup2.freebsd.org with the tag 'releng_5_3'. > Also tried and removed the entire src dir and cvsup'd again from > cvs3.freebsd.org with the same tag... hoping it might just be a corrupt > src I grabbed the first time. > > Other than the segfault errors the system has also hung once while > attempting to build world. and another time while `make cleandir` in > /usr/src to prepare for another attempt. > > One thing to note, when I buildworld it will exit at different points. > I also confirmed this with doing `time make buildworld`, the time > changes with each attempt as well. > > My make.conf contains... > "CFLAGS= -O -pipe" > "NO_BLUETOOTH= true" > "NO_SENDMAIL= true" > "NOPROFILE= true " > I've also tried a default make.conf file and some variations with my > make.conf but still nothing... > > I've tried `make buildworld` or `make -j4 buildworld` as suggested by > the handbook. > Each new attempt I always... > # chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/usr > # rm -rf /usr/obj/usr > # cd /usr/src > # make cleandir > I would do `make cleandir` twice as suggested by someone just to be sure > > I googled a bit and from what i gathered it could be a hardware > issue... Seems about right, request a tech @ the datacenter where the > server is located to run 'memtest'. Reported fine... > > I was sure it was a hardware issue, now I am completely out of options! > If anyone has -any- suggestions at all please let me know! > > A copy of one of the segfault errors while doing make buildworld: > --------------------------------------------- > ./contrib/gcc > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/config > -DGENERATOR_FILE -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/include -c > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/genmodes.c > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/genmodes.c: > In function `emit_insn_modes_c_header': > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/genmodes.c: > 836: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See for instructions. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > _______________________________________ Some redundancy: your supfile ought to look something like this: *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_3 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all After you cvsup'd - you read /usr/src/UPDATING for anything that might pop out at you A vvery basic /etc/make.conf: PERL_VER=5.8.6 PERL_VERSION=5.8.6 the statndard: cd /usr/obj chflags -R noschg * rm -rf * cd /usr/src make buildworld If all above true, I don't know. -- Best regards, Chris Any circuit design must contain at least one part which is obsolete, two parts which are unobtainable and three parts which at still under development. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 05:48:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC2916A4FD for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 05:48:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3EA43D45 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 05:48:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69915DA3; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 01:48:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69821-09; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 01:48:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-53-96.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.53.96]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62F75C85; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 01:48:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42576CB8.3080302@mac.com> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 01:48:40 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fadeaway@gmail.com References: <9603522236e10dbddacdb000cb7e8c08@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9603522236e10dbddacdb000cb7e8c08@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: segfaults when building world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 05:48:43 -0000 fadeaway@gmail.com wrote: [ ... ] > One thing to note, when I buildworld it will exit at different points. > I also confirmed this with doing `time make buildworld`, the time > changes with each attempt as well. If the compile were to fail in the same place, every time, there would be a chance that it might be a problem with the source code. However, if the compile fails in different places-- which is your case-- that's almost certainly a hardware problem such as your system overheating under load, a marginal power supply, or bad RAM. Check your CPU fan and other cooling, and try running memtest.org's checker overnight and see what that gives.... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 05:51:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AAE16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 05:51:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from S4.cableone.net (smtp4.cableone.net [24.116.0.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05D743D2D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 05:51:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.local.lan (unverified [69.92.156.141]) by S4.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S4) with ESMTP id 15716652 for multiple; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 23:02:52 -0700 Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 08:53:16 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: sergei@gnezdov.net Message-ID: <20050409085316.3735ed43@vixen42.local.lan> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 0, First 2, in=3, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 69.92.156.141 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: use-reply-to@gnezdov.net Subject: Re: Digital Cameras X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 05:51:20 -0000 On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > Is there a chance to get digital camers working with FreeBSD? All I > need is load images from camera using USB port. My suggestion is to get one that uses a flash card and get a flash card reader. Flash cards are just formated with fat, so they work with out problems under FreeBSD. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 06:33:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF90F16A4CE; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 06:33:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8494B43D54; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 06:33:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7BA7B72DDD; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 23:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FC072DD4; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 23:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 23:33:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Danny Howard In-Reply-To: <4256EC7A.5060107@toldme.com> Message-ID: <20050408230026.V67756@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <4256EC7A.5060107@toldme.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: (LONG) ATA Benchmark: 5.x Reads Slower than Writes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 06:33:41 -0000 On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Danny Howard wrote: > I don't have the time and hardware to do very scientific tests, but I > have been able to run a series of benchmarks using bonnie++ on some > systems I have available to me. The ATA-based gmirror performs > extremely well, compared to a few Adaptec RAIDs that we have, EXCEPT > that the sequential and random reads are MUCH SLOWER than the hardware > solution, and even *slower than the preceding write operations*. This > is counter-intuitive, especially since RAID1 implies slowed writes and > faster reads. I tried the benchmark on my workstation (single 2.5" IDE > in a laptop) and got comparable write-faster-than-read results. > The raw data can be viewed at > http://dannyman.toldme.com/scratch/benchmarks/ Could you place the 'dmesg' output for each system in this directory? The output here is marginally useful since it shows the bonnie command line. However, 100MB as the test filesize is really small unless the systems have 64MB of RAM though -- otherwise you're testing how well FreeBSD manages memory (or how much crap the systems are running when you run this test). For recent I/O tests I was doing with iozone I was using 10GB filesizes. This blows out the cache on just about everything. > Unfortunately, my hardware RAIDs are on FreeBSD 4, and gmirror is on 5. > My hardware RAIDs are on dual CPU systems, with 2G RAM, and my gmirror > is on a single hyperthreaded CPU with 512M. Yes, sorry, not especially > scientific. Maybe the changes in FreeBSD make a big difference? Maybe > RAM makes a big difference? Yes, lots. Both 4.x vs. 5.x and RAM :) > Sequential Read > laptop 2.5" ATA: avg 76/s # SLOWER than write! > gmirror ATA RAID1: avg 251/s # SLOWER than write! > Adaptec SCSI RAID1: avg 7862/s > Adaptec SCSI RAID10: avg 7618/s I'd be really careful here... that is # of files read per second after the create, and as pointed out before, SoftUpdates usually gets you a big win until it has to flush the directories out then things suffer during the actual flush op since the disk gets hammered. Lots of free memory to use for the directory cache helps. The disk cache on the RAID controller is buying you even more. From your results you were getting 9ms latency which is spot-on so I think you are simply misinterpreting your results here. File creation tests are usually more for filesystem-specific benchmarking than for throughput benchmarking. I'd suggest something more like iozone for throughput testing. If the volumes have nothing on them you care about then rawio can also be instructive. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 06:35:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8246E16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 06:35:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-04-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDBD43D58 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 06:35:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (cpe-065-184-201-054.ec.res.rr.com [65.184.201.54])j396ZQL4017478; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 02:35:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42577A15.10508@ec.rr.com> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 02:45:41 -0400 From: jason henson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050321) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fridtjof Busse References: <20050408183249.505119b7.fbusse@gmx.de> <1113003554.817.2.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> <20050409064329.3439161f.fbusse@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20050409064329.3439161f.fbusse@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox won't start X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 06:35:30 -0000 Fridtjof Busse wrote: >* Mike Jeays : > > >>>I just installed FreeBSD 5.4RC, everything works so fine. >>>Just firefox won't work (running xfce), neither the package nor the >>>port. I can only start it as root, under a normal user nothing >>>happens at all. /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox quits after a second and no >>>firefox. How can I fix this? >>>Thanks. >>> >>> >>At a guess, you may have created some configuration files owned by >>root the first time you started it. Try hunting them down and >>deleting them, and start firefox from a user account again. >> >> > >At first run, I tried to start firefox under the local user of course. >When that wouldn't work , I searched Google and found an old bug about >similiar behavior that suggested running firefox as root the first >time. Didn't help, so I'm stuck since it's uite some time I used >FreeBSD. > > > >>Also try running firefox from a command line in an xterm, if you >>haven't already done so, and see if there are any helpful error >>messages. >> >> > >I'm starting it from commandline. It doesn't print any errors and exits >after a second. >Under root, it starts and gives me debugging messages. > > > Does it do a core dump? What options did you use to compile? Are your dependancies out of date? There was just a big gnome update, see freebsd.org/gnome for an update script. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 06:41:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF78816A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 06:41:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D18143D3F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 06:41:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (cpe-065-184-201-054.ec.res.rr.com [65.184.201.54])j396fKY4004111; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 02:41:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42577B77.10000@ec.rr.com> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 02:51:35 -0400 From: jason henson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050321) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Gautherot References: <200504081044.47250.olivier@gautherot.net> In-Reply-To: <200504081044.47250.olivier@gautherot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pb with portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 06:41:24 -0000 Olivier Gautherot wrote: >Hi folks! > >I have a problem with the ports tree: every time I run pkgdb, portversion and >some others, the command dies with the following error (don't worry about the >stale dependency: I've installed cdrtools-cjk, which is required for the >GNOME upgrade... forget it for now). I followed the hints >in /usr/ports/UPDATING but no luck. The error message goes: > >Stale dependency: cdbakeoven-1.8.9_6 -> cdrtools-2.01 (sysutils/cdrtools): >cdrdao-1.1.9 (score:20%) ? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [no] >/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd5/readline.so: /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd5/readline.so: >Undefined symbol "rl_completer_quote_characters" >- /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd5/readline.so (LoadError) > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools.rb:364:in >`choose_from_options' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools.rb:363:in `loop' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools.rb:363:in >`choose_from_options' > from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:985:in `input_pkg' > from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:803:in `query_dep_fix' > from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:580:in `fix_dependencies' > from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:564:in `each' > from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:564:in `fix_dependencies' > from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:339:in `fix_db_phase1' > from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:335:in `each' > from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:335:in `fix_db_phase1' > from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:285:in `fix_db' > from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:231:in `main' > from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:64:in `initialize' > from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:64:in `new' > from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:64:in `main' > from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:1043 >bash-2.05b$ > >For some reason, ruby18 seems to have an issue with a faulty library. Any clue >of how to fix it? Please copy me on answers as I'm not subscribed to the >list. > >Thanks in advance > > portupgrade and friends depend on ruby. You can try updating ruby like so: make deinstall distclean && make reinstall, then do the same for portupgrade all after a cvsup for your ports. Or just use portmanager. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 06:50:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC1F16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 06:50:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from excalibur.fbunet.de (excalibur.fbunet.de [80.190.243.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FD043D31 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 06:50:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbusse@gmx.de) Received: from artus.fbunet.de (port-212-202-40-81.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.40.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by excalibur.fbunet.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F6519071 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 08:50:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 08:50:33 +0200 From: Fridtjof Busse To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050409085033.79839422.fbusse@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <42577A15.10508@ec.rr.com> References: <20050408183249.505119b7.fbusse@gmx.de> <1113003554.817.2.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> <20050409064329.3439161f.fbusse@gmx.de> <42577A15.10508@ec.rr.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.7 (GTK+ 2.6.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Firefox won't start X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 06:50:35 -0000 * jason henson : > >I'm starting it from commandline. It doesn't print any errors and > >exits after a second. > >Under root, it starts and gives me debugging messages. > > Does it do a core dump? What options did you use to compile? Are > your dependancies out of date? There was just a big gnome update, > see freebsd.org/gnome for an update script. It's a fresh 5.4RC installation, so I doubt there's anything out of date. Package behaves the same as the port (I cimpiled after the package wouldn't work, no special options). I simply run firefox, nothing happens: $ which firefox /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox $ firefox $ No window, no process, nothing. But: /usr/X11R6/lib/firefox/firefox-bin also exits, complaining about missing libmozjs.so (ldd show me that the library is in fact not found). libmozjs.so exists: /usr/X11R6/lib/firefox/libmozjs.so But why does it work as root then (running the firefox-script, not firefox-bin directly)? -- Fridtjof Busse Fry: "Hey, you guys, the most amazing thing happened, it's two-for-one Tuesday at Krispy Kreme! Plus there's mermaids." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 08:39:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE49A16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 08:39:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp14.wxs.nl (smtp14.wxs.nl [195.121.6.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6815B43D53 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 08:39:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from ZGISH (ip3e833f72.speed.planet.nl [62.131.63.114]) by smtp14.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEO002CE82GOQ@smtp14.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:39:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:40:01 +0200 From: Kiffin Gish To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <000f01c53cdf$b8242fc0$9900000a@ZGISH> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_aBPfj9kDByu61M88gopKUg)" Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 00000000DA18B7C9E0C09641B844D919507EA016A4604000 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Loading .bash_profile under X-Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 08:39:54 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_aBPfj9kDByu61M88gopKUg) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT How can I get terminal under X-Windows to load my .bash_profile (and any other stuff) that is usually loaded when at the initial prompt? A more general question might be: what files (.profile, .login, whatever) and in what order are loaded every I login via a shell and how are these settings propagated up through Gnome desktop? Thanks a lot in advance. -- Kiffin Rex Gish Gouda, The Netherlands --Boundary_(ID_aBPfj9kDByu61M88gopKUg)-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 09:29:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26C216A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 09:29:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zeus.piweb.nl (piweblw.demon.nl [82.161.24.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084BC43D41 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 09:29:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@familiemeijer.org) Received: from openbsd.piweb.intern (n100.piweb.intern [192.168.2.100]) by zeus.piweb.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 3200EA294 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:29:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:29:37 +0200 From: Nico Meijer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050409112937.3796077d.lists@familiemeijer.org> In-Reply-To: <000f01c53cdf$b8242fc0$9900000a@ZGISH> References: <000f01c53cdf$b8242fc0$9900000a@ZGISH> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.6 (GTK+ 2.4.4; i386-unknown-openbsd3.6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Loading .bash_profile under X-Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:29:38 -0000 He Kiffin, > How can I get terminal under X-Windows to load my .bash_profile (and > any other stuff) that is usually loaded when at the initial prompt? Run `xterm -ls`. Then read its man page. ;-) Bye... Nico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 09:35:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4D416A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 09:35:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0220843D39 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 09:35:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j399ZMb26959; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 02:35:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Andrew Heyn" , Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 02:35:02 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-reply-to: X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Compaq Proliant 8500 issue with Integrated SMART Array RAIDController (ida) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:35:20 -0000 owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote: > Hi, > > I have a Compaq Proliant 8500 with the integrated SMART Array RAID > controller. I recall seeing "Symbios" and "ARM" on a chip on the > center of the PCI module > must be the > RAID controller. I > used to have extreme problems even getting the system to boot > up until I > used the SmartStart > CD and disabled the "Array Accelerator" for my one and only RAID1+0 > Container. (Before doing this) I would get numerous > ida0: soft write error and if the system did manage to boot > up, a process > might read the disk, and > forever be stuck in some kernel routine between userland and > the disk that > gets a block or whatever. > Now, I only get an occasional "ida0: soft read/write error" which > occasionally causes a 15 or so second delay. The "Array > Accelerator" for > the Integrated SMART array controller is 8MB of read-only cache. > Other SMART Array models like the 4200 have battery backed up cache > that can be user-separated between write and read cache. > > I'm wondering if anybody has ever seen the problem mentioned above. > > I would hate to have to replace the whole > PCI module because of some bad controller ram since that darn thing is > integrated, and would make useless the > internal bays if another raid card was added. As a note, the contacts > between the hard drive and the drive module > have been cleaned out multiple times for all the drives in the > array. The > connection between the drive module and > the back of the computer is sturdy and clean. There are only > TWO cables in > this entire system that I know of, and one > is for the IDE CDROM, and one is for the floppy. So, cabling > cannot be a > problem. I also have two working PSUs that > each have a 120V line going into it, so I doubt it's a lack of > power. Even > though 220V is recommended for both of them, > it works fine with even just one 120V line. > > I asked the HP/Compaq forum and they weren't able to give me > much more of an > answer than "check the cabling" and "blow > off the dust" which I found extremely irritating because the > data is carried > on copper wires that resemble the pins found > on an IDE hard drive or floppy, not your standard "cabling." I might > ultimately be wrong...but I doubt it. > You should ask Windows questions in a Windows forum. Oh, you aren't running Windows on this system? Must be FreeBSD 2.2 then, right? Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 09:59:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B90B16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 09:59:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sanddollar.geekisp.com (sanddollar.geekisp.com [204.89.131.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E66743D1F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 09:59:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from njt@dune.geekisp.com) Received: (qmail 15649 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2005 09:59:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (192.168.4.35) by mail.geekisp.com with QMQP; 9 Apr 2005 09:59:27 -0000 Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 05:59:49 -0400 From: "N.J. Thomas" To: Fridtjof Busse Message-ID: <20050409095949.GB9427@ayvali.org> References: <20050408183249.505119b7.fbusse@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050408183249.505119b7.fbusse@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox won't start X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:59:29 -0000 * Fridtjof Busse [2005-04-08 18:32:49 +0200]: > I just installed FreeBSD 5.4RC, everything works so fine. Just firefox > won't work (running xfce), neither the package nor the port. I can > only start it as root, under a normal user nothing happens at all. > /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox quits after a second and no firefox. Had same problem under 5.3. Tracked it down to permissions problems when I gave root a new shell (with umask 077 instead of 022). Run find on /usr and see if there are any files/dirs with perms of 600/700 that look like they should be public. (I believe in my case it was some gconf dirs.) hth, Thomas -- N.J. Thomas njt@ayvali.org Etiamsi occiderit me, in ipso sperabo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 10:31:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C94116A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:31:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ender.liquidneon.com (ender.liquidneon.com [64.78.150.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3280143D45 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:31:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from so14k@so14k.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ender.liquidneon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7C44132; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:31:49 -0600 (MDT) Received: from ender.liquidneon.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ender.liquidneon.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94762-10; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:31:49 -0600 (MDT) Received: by ender.liquidneon.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 37EA241C1; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:31:49 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:31:49 -0600 From: Brad Davis To: racerx@makeworld.com Message-ID: <20050409103148.GA99525@ender.liquidneon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ender.liquidneon.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: segfaults when building world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:31:50 -0000 [...] > *default compress [...] PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE turn this off if you aren't on dialup. All it does is waste CPU on the cvsup servers. Regards, Brad Davis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 10:37:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8E716A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:37:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from excalibur.fbunet.de (excalibur.fbunet.de [80.190.243.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2160943D1D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:37:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbusse@gmx.de) Received: from artus.fbunet.de (port-212-202-40-81.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.40.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by excalibur.fbunet.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4D219071 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 12:37:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 12:37:15 +0200 From: Fridtjof Busse To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050409123715.39061961.fbusse@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20050409095949.GB9427@ayvali.org> References: <20050408183249.505119b7.fbusse@gmx.de> <20050409095949.GB9427@ayvali.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.7 (GTK+ 2.6.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Firefox won't start X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:37:17 -0000 * "N.J. Thomas" : > > I just installed FreeBSD 5.4RC, everything works so fine. Just > > firefox won't work (running xfce), neither the package nor the > > port. I can only start it as root, under a normal user nothing > > happens at all. /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox quits after a second and no > > firefox. > > Had same problem under 5.3. Tracked it down to permissions problems > when I gave root a new shell (with umask 077 instead of 022). > > Run find on /usr and see if there are any files/dirs with perms of > 600/700 that look like they should be public. (I believe in my case it > was some gconf dirs.) I'll look into this, thanks. But how can a package have wrong permissions? I installed the port (after deleting everything 'pkg_add -r firefox' installed) after I noticed the package didn't work. -- Fridtjof Busse "Laura and I really don't realize how bright our children is sometimes until we get an objective analysis." George W. Bush April 15, 2000 Comment made on NBC's Meet the Press. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 11:15:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CCF16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:15:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from excalibur.fbunet.de (excalibur.fbunet.de [80.190.243.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E127043D1D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:15:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbusse@gmx.de) Received: from artus.fbunet.de (port-212-202-40-81.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.40.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by excalibur.fbunet.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07B319071 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:15:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:15:50 +0200 From: Fridtjof Busse To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050409131550.2bafaffb.fbusse@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20050409095949.GB9427@ayvali.org> References: <20050408183249.505119b7.fbusse@gmx.de> <20050409095949.GB9427@ayvali.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.7 (GTK+ 2.6.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Firefox won't start X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:15:52 -0000 * "N.J. Thomas" : > > I just installed FreeBSD 5.4RC, everything works so fine. Just > > firefox won't work (running xfce), neither the package nor the > > port. I can only start it as root, under a normal user nothing > > happens at all. /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox quits after a second and no > > firefox. > > Had same problem under 5.3. Tracked it down to permissions problems > when I gave root a new shell (with umask 077 instead of 022). > > Run find on /usr and see if there are any files/dirs with perms of > 600/700 that look like they should be public. (I believe in my case it > was some gconf dirs.) Nope, 'find /usr -perm 700' and 'find /usr -perm 600' show up nothing unusual. Just three files from xdm. Still no firefox :( -- Fridtjof Busse "Some things don't need the thought people give them." -Hobbes From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 11:26:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E3516A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:26:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7E643D45 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:26:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pwaring@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so820657rna for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 04:26:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WOYaqr6tMR/HmzIvUPMLzG5P4Nb47VG7TH2SSPp+N9Izle5p3R35ksVbfP0ul0xKesm612RHB/sXDilNSJNRTkdEy1q1EMtmJ9pw9W7rm6zNs1c070kMLnYDValz7CUMVpz5sn/oSa6I8cm3gzKhpuJtxPbU4MsfuSjBmtgN3oU= Received: by 10.38.68.47 with SMTP id q47mr484747rna; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 04:26:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.76.66 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8953a1db05040904263a1e2a79@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 12:26:48 +0100 From: Paul Waring To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Installing portupgrade without X.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Waring List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:26:50 -0000 I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a download for X.org. This is a server system and there's no monitor attached so installing X is a bit pointless and a waste of time for me, but I don't know how to say "install this port *without* X dependancies" as this is the first time I've come across this problem (when I installed cvsup I used the -without-gui port so it wasn't a problem). I've searched around but the only relevant material I've managed to find is something about installing the JDK without X.org which seems to be specific to that case and all the other results seem to be about problems installing X which I don't want to do. I'm fairly new to BSD and I've never got this far setting up a system from scratch before (every other time I've stumbled somewhere on the way) so any advice/pointers would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Paul -- Rogue Tory www.roguetory.org.uk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 12:27:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B46916A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 12:27:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D9243D46 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 12:27:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 20001 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2005 12:27:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([pbs]775067@[83.129.13.113]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 9 Apr 2005 12:27:07 -0000 Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 14:27:08 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20050409142708.51d7ade0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20050407160107.GA66262@thought.org> References: <20050407160107.GA66262@thought.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: [OT] is there a ThinkPad clone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 12:27:10 -0000 Gary Kline wrote: > Apologies up front if anybody thinks this is *too* far OT, > but if the 8 months I've been using FreeBSD on my TP 600E > (400MHz, 288M, 12G). it has become my favorite computer. > __Not__ having that std mouse-pad thing where you scratch > or drag or tap your fingers lets me rest the heel of my left > hand dead-center and type away. The tiny mouse-stick and the > three cut/paste bars work well too. > > When I upgrade, I'd like another laptop with the same > layout. The few other laptops I've looked at all have > that mouse-pad. Anybody know if there is anything like > a "ThinkPad clone"?? A lot of ThinkPads have both, mouse pad _and_ mouse stick. I wouldn't count the mere existence of a mouse pad as a reason against a special laptop. If you prefer the mouse stick and only use the mouse pad by accident, you can disable the mouse pad in the BIOS. I did too. Fabian -- http://www.fabiankeil.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 13:07:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597AF16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:07:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16FC43D1F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:07:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tindasz@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1061843wra for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 06:07:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gBHkEFT+uKH3DTxL4MWVUj/no+b2coTWFK8RW7+dWAPSozuK7l1ZYmAR5w20TpGqm/KAKB9gl/knRXkRkxDTDen2t7L+4UjLR6U1PmG7+JNlYd/cYhaJlmvQBLh3ek2ooYpGTNm5BfQ7NCscbcaBbZna7V8M7OFHrJex2TzyBjo= Received: by 10.54.40.53 with SMTP id n53mr2191218wrn; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 06:07:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.69.1 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 06:07:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6b5da16e050409060749b16b56@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 06:07:17 -0700 From: jellf nainggolan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: I865 Graphics Controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jellf nainggolan List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 13:07:18 -0000 i have motherboat intel 865 GBF, and now i'm using FreeBSD 4-11 KDE, my question when i try using startx, i'm always get error message, FreeBSD 4-11 support for i864 graphics controller and if i must compile kernel what option must add ? urgent please. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 13:12:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B43616A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:12:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from route.lis.de (p54A1D623.dip.t-dialin.net [84.161.214.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C2343D1F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:12:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lis@1234567890qwertzuiopasdfghjklyxcvbnm.de) Received: from xp2400 (master [192.168.0.2]) by route.lis.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id j39E9TDn099950 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:09:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lis@1234567890qwertzuiopasdfghjklyxcvbnm.de) Message-ID: <001101c53d05$c63e7540$0200a8c0@xp2400> From: "Lis" To: Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:12:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Subject: gcc 3.4.3 compile with fbsd 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 13:12:27 -0000 system: freebsd 5.3 with intel pentium 3 ok 1) downloaded 2) extracted 3) mk objdir 4) ../configure --prefix=/somewhere/ 5) make bootstrap [###############output] file# make bootstrap /bin/sh ./config.status --recheck running /bin/sh hdd/hdd1/Files/gcc/gcc-3.4.3/libiberty/configure --cache-file=./config.cache --build=i386-unknown-freebsd5.3 --host=i386-unknown-freebsd5.3 --target=i386-unknown-freebsd5.3 --prefix=/hdd/hdd1/Files/gcc/gcc343comp --with-gcc-version-trigger=/hdd/hdd1/Files/gcc/gcc-3.4.3/gcc/version.c --program-transform-name=s,y,y, --srcdir=../../gcc-3.4.3/libiberty CFLAGS=-g -O2 host_alias=i386-unknown-freebsd5.3 build_alias=i386-unknown-freebsd5.3 target_alias=i386-unknown-freebsd5.3 CC=gcc --no-create --no-recursion rm: conftest*: Invalid argument configure: loading cache ./config.cache configure: error: `LDFLAGS' was not set in the previous run configure: error: changes in the environment can compromise the build configure: error: run `make distclean' and/or `rm ./config.cache' and start over rm: core.*: Invalid argument rm: *.core: Invalid argument *** Error code 1 Stop in /hdd/hdd1/Files/gcc/gcc343comp/libiberty. *** Error code 1 Stop in /hdd/hdd1/Files/gcc/gcc343comp. [###################screen end] the first question is: why i get this rm failures? i served the config files and know the man of rm... this must work... "rm -f xxx* xxx*" is mostly used but makes the failures i thought... (./Makefile ./libiberty/configure.lineno ./config.cache) [##################all rm -f commands in my config] ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f conf$$.sh ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conf$$ conf$$.exe conf$$.file ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conf$$ conf$$.exe conf$$.file ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f core core.* *.core && ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f a.out a.exe conftest$ac_cv_exeext b.out ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest$ac_cv_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.o conftest.obj ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_cv_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_ext conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest* ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f conftest.er1 ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f conftest.er1 ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f conftest.er1 ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f conftest.er1 ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest* ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f core core.* *.core gmon.out bb.out conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f conftest.er1 ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest* ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest* ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f core core.* *.core gmon.out bb.out conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f conftest.er1 ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest* ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f core core.* *.core gmon.out bb.out conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f conftest.er1 ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f core core.* *.core gmon.out bb.out conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f core core.* *.core gmon.out bb.out conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f conftest.er1 ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f core core.* *.core gmon.out bb.out conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.mmap ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest$ac_exeext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f core core.* *.core gmon.out bb.out conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f core core.* *.core ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f confcache ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f conf$$.sh ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conf$$ conf$$.exe conf$$.file ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conf$$ conf$$.exe conf$$.file ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f "$ac_file" ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f $tmp/stdin ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f $tmp/out ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.defines conftest.undefs ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f confdef2sed.sed ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.tail ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f $tmp/in ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f conftest.defines ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.defines ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.tail ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f $tmp/in ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f conftest.undefs ./libiberty/configure.lineno:rm -f conftest.undefs ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f $tmp/in ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f $ac_file ./libiberty/configure.lineno: rm -f $tmp/config.h ./libiberty/config.status: rm -f conf$$.sh ./libiberty/config.status:rm -f conf$$ conf$$.exe conf$$.file ./libiberty/config.status:rm -f conf$$ conf$$.exe conf$$.file ./libiberty/config.status: rm -f "$ac_file" ./libiberty/config.status: rm -f $tmp/stdin ./libiberty/config.status: rm -f $tmp/out ./libiberty/config.status: rm -f $tmp/in ./libiberty/config.status: rm -f $tmp/in ./libiberty/config.status: rm -f $tmp/in ./libiberty/config.status: rm -f $tmp/in ./libiberty/config.status: rm -f $tmp/in ./libiberty/config.status: rm -f $tmp/in ./libiberty/config.status: rm -f $tmp/in ./libiberty/config.status: rm -f $ac_file ./libiberty/config.status: rm -f $tmp/config.h ./libiberty/Makefile: -rm -f $(TARGETLIB) pic/$(TARGETLIB) ./libiberty/Makefile: -rm -f $(TESTLIB) ./libiberty/Makefile: rm -f needed-list; touch needed-list; \ ./libiberty/Makefile: -rm -f needed.awk needed2.awk errors dummy needed-list config.h stamp-* ./libiberty/Makefile: -rm -f $(CONFIG_H) $(NEEDED_LIST) stamp-picdir ./libiberty/Makefile: -rm -f libiberty.aux libiberty.cp libiberty.cps libiberty.fn libiberty.ky ./libiberty/Makefile: -rm -f libiberty.log libiberty.tmp libiberty.tps libiberty.pg ./libiberty/Makefile: -rm -f libiberty.pgs libiberty.toc libiberty.tp libiberty.tpl libiberty.vr ./libiberty/Makefile: -rm -f libtexi.stamp ./libiberty/Makefile: -rm -f *.a required-list tmpmulti.out ./libiberty/Makefile: -rm -f libiberty.dvi libiberty.info* libiberty.html ./libiberty/Makefile: -rm -f *~ Makefile config.cache config.status xhost-mkfrag TAGS multilib.out ./libiberty/Makefile: -rm -f config.log ./libiberty/testsuite/Makefile: rm -f test-demangle ./libiberty/testsuite/Makefile: rm -f Makefile ./config.status: rm -f conftest.s$ac_file ./config.status: rm -f "$ac_file" ./config.status:rm -f conftest.s* ./Makefile: -rm -f *.a TEMP errs core *.o *~ \#* TAGS *.E *.log ./Makefile: -rm -f Makefile config.status config.cache mh-frag mt-frag ./Makefile: -rm -f multilib.out multilib.tmp maybedep.tmp serdep.tmp ./Makefile: -rm -f texinfo/po/Makefile texinfo/po/Makefile.in texinfo/info/Makefile ./Makefile: -rm -f texinfo/doc/Makefile texinfo/po/POTFILES ./Makefile: while read d; do rm -f gcc/$$d/libgcc.a || : ; done ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/libstdc++-v3/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/newlib/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/libf2c/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/libobjc/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/libtermcap/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/winsup/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/libgloss/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/libiberty/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/gperf/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/examples/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/libffi/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/libjava/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/zlib/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/boehm-gc/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/qthreads/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f $(TARGET_SUBDIR)/rda/Makefile || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f no-such-file || : ; \ ./Makefile: rm -f gcc/stmp-headers gcc/stmp-int-hdrs; \ [#############end of rm commands] the second: LDFLAGS are green small animals that have big ears and pink hairs... no... i think tomorrow i know this... and do it by hand... (but if u not boring with hackin on ur keyboard u can explain this var, thx) the last: points to one.... thanks for the poky lifetime... greets From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 13:14:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EA816A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:14:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from route.lis.de (p54A1D623.dip.t-dialin.net [84.161.214.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0643B43D45 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:14:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lis@1234567890qwertzuiopasdfghjklyxcvbnm.de) Received: from xp2400 (master [192.168.0.2]) by route.lis.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id j39EBGUN099980 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:11:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lis@1234567890qwertzuiopasdfghjklyxcvbnm.de) Message-ID: <001a01c53d06$05c43510$0200a8c0@xp2400> From: "Lis" To: References: <6b5da16e050409060749b16b56@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:14:12 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Subject: Re: I865 Graphics Controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 13:14:11 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "jellf nainggolan" To: Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 3:07 PM Subject: I865 Graphics Controller >i have motherboat intel 865 GBF, and now i'm using FreeBSD 4-11 KDE, > my question when i try using startx, i'm always get error message, > FreeBSD 4-11 support for i864 graphics controller and if i must compile > kernel > what option must add ? > > urgent please. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > whitch error message? whitch version of xfree (or xorg) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 14:24:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C91116A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 14:24:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web31807.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31807.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C30943D48 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 14:24:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nirv199@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 83189 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Apr 2005 14:24:57 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=Sd4CDB3jQl5J7bt9JWkOgbW1O8x1G8rU8parl0DDjzX8maqBSH1/r+mQRiWdCVtjQOoK0yPKqlR+RNucHc6tKGYqewR6xAFUGnyp+VYzmp/Ksycnd+2qGhKXRGv8jGoVh+bd379mqKOG2H0XZA3I5I2iaPbidcxqVZ+Sebz4Ykk= ; Message-ID: <20050409142457.83187.qmail@web31807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.138.48.148] by web31807.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 07:24:57 PDT Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 07:24:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Paulo Roberto To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: check for badblocks in hd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 14:24:58 -0000 Hello, I read the newfs man page but I couldn't find anything related to bad block checking. Is there a tool for doing it? thanks, Paulo __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 14:32:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF69916A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 14:32:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from route.lis.de (p54A1D623.dip.t-dialin.net [84.161.214.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D3643D3F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 14:32:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lis@1234567890qwertzuiopasdfghjklyxcvbnm.de) Received: from xp2400 (master [192.168.0.2]) by route.lis.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id j39FTgWi000387 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:29:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lis@1234567890qwertzuiopasdfghjklyxcvbnm.de) Message-ID: <000501c53d10$fbbb62e0$0200a8c0@xp2400> From: "Lis" To: References: <20050409142457.83187.qmail@web31807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:32:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Subject: Re: check for badblocks in hd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 14:32:39 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paulo Roberto" To: Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 4:24 PM Subject: check for badblocks in hd > Hello, > > I read the newfs man page but I couldn't find anything related to bad > block checking. Is there a tool for doing it? > > thanks, > > Paulo > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > man fsck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 14:54:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0C116A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 14:54:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at (lilzmailso01.liwest.at [212.33.55.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BB843D31 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 14:54:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm250-191.liwest.at ([81.10.250.191] helo=[192.168.1.11]) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1DKHLh-00081P-Kc; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:54:13 +0200 From: Daniela To: Fridtjof Busse , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:55:55 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <20050408183249.505119b7.fbusse@gmx.de> <20050409095949.GB9427@ayvali.org> <20050409131550.2bafaffb.fbusse@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20050409131550.2bafaffb.fbusse@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504091655.55988.dgw@liwest.at> Subject: Re: Firefox won't start X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dgw@liwest.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 14:54:16 -0000 On Saturday 09 April 2005 11:15, Fridtjof Busse wrote: > * "N.J. Thomas" : > > > I just installed FreeBSD 5.4RC, everything works so fine. Just > > > firefox won't work (running xfce), neither the package nor the > > > port. I can only start it as root, under a normal user nothing > > > happens at all. /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox quits after a second and no > > > firefox. > > > > Had same problem under 5.3. Tracked it down to permissions problems > > when I gave root a new shell (with umask 077 instead of 022). > > > > Run find on /usr and see if there are any files/dirs with perms of > > 600/700 that look like they should be public. (I believe in my case it > > was some gconf dirs.) > > Nope, 'find /usr -perm 700' and 'find /usr -perm 600' show up nothing > unusual. Just three files from xdm. > Still no firefox :( I'd suggest you to run firefox under gdb or with truss. So far I had quite a few programs not starting up properly and in many cases it would exit just after accessing a file and then you know where to look. Or it gets a signal. Daniela -- It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 15:14:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00D116A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:14:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0FC43D31 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:14:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 32407 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2005 15:14:25 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 9 Apr 2005 15:14:25 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 514E352; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:14:24 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Paulo Roberto References: <20050409142457.83187.qmail@web31807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 09 Apr 2005 11:14:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050409142457.83187.qmail@web31807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <44br8o3ru7.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: check for badblocks in hd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:14:26 -0000 Paulo Roberto writes: > I read the newfs man page but I couldn't find anything related to bad > block checking. Is there a tool for doing it? Modern disks handle bad blocks internally, so they are not visible to the operating system (until the disk is almost dead, anyway). There are usually manufacturer tools for looking at it more closely, but by and large, if you know you have bad blocks, it's time to get a new disk. There is a FAQ entry on this, with considerably more information. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 15:37:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B35916A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:37:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from allrounder.lame.at (mail.lame.at [195.58.166.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13F943D41 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:37:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from haimat@lame.at) Received: from itchy.lame.at (unknown [213.235.192.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by allrounder.lame.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id D304B30102; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:37:44 +0200 (CEST) From: "Matthias F. Brandstetter" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:37:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200504070941.42684.haimat@lame.at> <7c263b6d05040705363e39daa7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7c263b6d05040705363e39daa7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504091737.44009.haimat@lame.at> cc: Yoann Le Bihan Subject: Re: how to enable PHP on Apache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:37:47 -0000 ---------- quoting Yoann Le Bihan ---------- > Hello ! :-) > > You just need to install mod_php port. It's located into > /usr/ports/www (there are a mod_php4/ and a mod_php5/ directories). > Just "make install clean" from one or two of these directories and it > must be installed. Because I think it's not installed (even if it's > mentionned in httpd.conf... it's strange by the way :-). > > Don't forget to make a "/usr/local/sbin/apachectl restart" after (if > it's not already done from the port's installation). I did all you said, httpd-error.conf says: "Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_perl/1.29 PHP/4.3.11 configured -- resuming normal operations" But when I try to access my phpmyadmin installation Firefox asks me which program I want to use to open this PHP file :( Any other ideas? I am somewhat lost here :( Greetings and TIA, Matthias -- See you in hell, candy boys!! -- Homer Simpson Homer Badman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 15:43:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E00E16A4D1 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:43:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A90343D2F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:43:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050409154328.RAQI2192.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:43:28 -0400 From: To: "Dick Hoogendijk" , "freebsd-questions" , Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:43:23 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050408212553.GA24559@lothlorien.nagual.st> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: IPF Firewall Rules... help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:43:30 -0000 Dick Since you say you have lime ware working on your LAN behind firewall why don't you post your rules so we can see how you did it. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Dick Hoogendijk Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 5:26 PM To: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: IPF Firewall Rules... help! On 08 Apr bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > If you read the limewire website carefully you will see that no where > does it say it will work on PC on a local area network (LAN). This is > one of those products that buries the sending IP address in the > packets. A PC on the LAN uses an NATed ip address and this product can > not handle that. This is a common problem with products such as this. Are you saying here that limewire does /not/ run on clients on a NATted local area network? If so, how come then that limewire runs on my windows client, as well as on my OS-X and FreeBSD clients? All NATted of course. > It's just not designed to work on PC that is on a LAN. It works like a charme for me though. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 15:48:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7B016A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:48:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate1.dslextreme.com (mailgate1.dslextreme.com [66.51.199.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD4E43D49 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:48:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rshakin@unixfreak.org) Received: from mail5.dslextreme.com (unknown [192.168.7.93]) by mailgate1.dslextreme.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D0F576302FD for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 08:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19767 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2005 15:48:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.102]) (rshakin@66.245.221.109) by mail5.dslextreme.com with SMTP; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 08:48:50 -0700 Message-ID: <4257F976.1090103@unixfreak.org> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 08:49:10 -0700 From: Roman Shakin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050325) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Waring References: <8953a1db05040904263a1e2a79@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8953a1db05040904263a1e2a79@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DSLExtreme-MailGate-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DSLExtreme-MailGate: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: rshakin@unixfreak.org cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:48:51 -0000 Hey Paul From what I remember portupgrade does not use x-libs. But your culprit might be ruby or bzip because they are the dependencies for this pkg and those might require some kind of x-libs to run. You might want to look into the makefiles for each dependency and looking if it's using X in any ways. And seeing there if you can disable it. --Roman Paul Waring wrote: > I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by > running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after > doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts > fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a > download for X.org. This is a server system and there's no monitor > attached so installing X is a bit pointless and a waste of time for > me, but I don't know how to say "install this port *without* X > dependancies" as this is the first time I've come across this problem > (when I installed cvsup I used the -without-gui port so it wasn't a > problem). > > I've searched around but the only relevant material I've managed to > find is something about installing the JDK without X.org which seems > to be specific to that case and all the other results seem to be about > problems installing X which I don't want to do. I'm fairly new to BSD > and I've never got this far setting up a system from scratch before > (every other time I've stumbled somewhere on the way) so any > advice/pointers would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks in advance. > > Paul > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:01:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D7816A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:01:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from allrounder.lame.at (mail.softlink.at [195.58.166.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3437943D49 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:01:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from haimat@lame.at) Received: from itchy.lame.at (unknown [213.235.192.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by allrounder.lame.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BAD30102 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:01:07 +0200 (CEST) From: "Matthias F. Brandstetter" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:01:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200504070941.42684.haimat@lame.at> <7c263b6d05040705363e39daa7@mail.gmail.com> <200504091737.44009.haimat@lame.at> In-Reply-To: <200504091737.44009.haimat@lame.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504091801.05319.haimat@lame.at> Subject: Re: how to enable PHP on Apache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:01:09 -0000 ---------- quoting Matthias F. Brandstetter ---------- > I did all you said, httpd-error.conf says: "Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) > mod_perl/1.29 PHP/4.3.11 configured -- resuming normal operations" > > But when I try to access my phpmyadmin installation Firefox asks me > which program I want to use to open this PHP file :( Sorry for answering to my own post, but I think I found the problem: I have RT installed on the same system, using mod_perl. When I disable startup of mod_perl, I can access phpmyadmin. So the problem only happens when I use mod_perl with my config. I tried it with SetHandler default-handler Alias /phpmyadmin /usr/local/www/phpMyAdmin but still have this problem :( Any ideas? -- You know something, folks, as ridiculous as this sounds, I would rather feel the sweet breath of my beautiful wife on the back of my neck as I sleep than stuff dollar bills into some stranger's G-string. -- Homer Simpson Homer's Night Out From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:02:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C40216A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:02:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CB543D46 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:02:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julie@corevps.com) Received: from rus.demon.co.uk ([158.152.92.38] helo=jackhammer) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1DKIQ4-0005Jh-E4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:02:48 +0000 From: Julie To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:13:45 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200504070941.42684.haimat@lame.at> <7c263b6d05040705363e39daa7@mail.gmail.com> <200504091737.44009.haimat@lame.at> In-Reply-To: <200504091737.44009.haimat@lame.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504091713.45461.julie@corevps.com> Subject: Re: how to enable PHP on Apache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:02:50 -0000 > > I did all you said, httpd-error.conf says: "Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) > mod_perl/1.29 PHP/4.3.11 configured -- resuming normal operations" > > But when I try to access my phpmyadmin installation Firefox asks me which > program I want to use to open this PHP file :( > > Any other ideas? > I am somewhat lost here :( > > Greetings and TIA, Matthias It sounds like you've not got any mime types set in httpd.confg. You want to add something like AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .php4 .php3 See if that helps -- Julie CoreVPS Director CoreVPS.com - Root Access FreeBSD and Linux servers from $7.99/mo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:07:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A7E16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:07:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20CD43D2D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:07:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [10.0.0.7] (dsl-228-111.dynamic-dsl.frii.net [216.17.228.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j39G79Do005867 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:07:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <4257FC16.1080204@vilot.com> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:00:22 -0600 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050330) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: httpd.core X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:07:21 -0000 What tools do I use to examine a core dump file? I'd like to at least have a clue what is wrong with httpd :c) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:10:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586B716A4D1 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:10:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.UU.SE [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3054B43D2D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:10:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 186384C3E; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:10:28 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s208906; Sat, 9 Apr 05 18:10:23 +0200 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC004915 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:10:23 +0200 (MSZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id 4EDB838016; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:10:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BF25C002 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:10:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:10:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Davour To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Italics not shown properly in OpenOffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:10:31 -0000 Hi! I have a strange problem in OpenOffice 1.1.4 with italics. Text formatted as italics doesn't show up in italics on screen. If I cut and paste som text from an old document it hows up properly. This is very strange, and a quite severe bug - if that's what it is. I searched the list and found no mentioning of it. Google found a bugrapport for some debianthingie, but that was from 2003. Is it my system that's misbehaving, or OO? Is there something I can do to fix this? Anyone? /andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:11:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6FF16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:11:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3A543D2D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:11:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so868651rnf for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:11:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KchKIcUPlskEqgrSp2t7NErj5NRmGxIeYlOqbSOOP3VN4Oy80HFBk/oQaEd0rXH7BSLqXQ2aNnNeN0dRrNzASG6I9dz8QZmt1JzLLBUwD8xoeFzJSbyEnk5Yf/gcLm3lRHV3TXoEAKfFBWfN/5Nl0PgY4kiSBvctowugaY1ra7s= Received: by 10.38.65.1 with SMTP id n1mr2709067rna; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?127.0.0.1? ([59.93.160.163]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 70sm1534580rnc.2005.04.09.09.11.44; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4257FEC7.2030707@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 21:41:51 +0530 From: Subhro User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Vilot References: <4257FC16.1080204@vilot.com> In-Reply-To: <4257FC16.1080204@vilot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: httpd.core X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:11:47 -0000 Tom Vilot wrote: > What tools do I use to examine a core dump file? For examining any core file you need a debugger. A very popular debugger is the GNU Debugger also known as gdb man gdb for more information Regards S. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:12:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1DE16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:12:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C7443D53 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:12:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so868701rnf for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:12:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dx6AI+ZWhEGiKYG5B1WjTaqGwoYcvxINT67CEklTIZ/ANP9FBTgjKEgRs3nj3EVn9moKgiolzg0qVVMHFfVdkMP+IYPGL1sDaQsK0T9BHxccBa26vA+qXfg0pnsByQPD8PL5+Q1CUOMqKS9pAN9OXey0u1u6YGosdOUfYvtYwtE= Received: by 10.39.3.48 with SMTP id f48mr2737901rni; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?127.0.0.1? ([59.93.160.163]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 70sm1246128rnb.2005.04.09.09.12.20; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4257FEEB.3040608@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 21:42:27 +0530 From: Subhro User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Vilot References: <4257FC16.1080204@vilot.com> In-Reply-To: <4257FC16.1080204@vilot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: httpd.core X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:12:24 -0000 Tom Vilot wrote: > What tools do I use to examine a core dump file? For examining any core file you need a debugger. A very popular debugger is the GNU Debugger also known as gdb man gdb for more information Regards S. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:19:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA9116A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:19:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.versatel.nl (smtp1.versatel.nl [62.58.50.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255A543D41 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:19:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from f.staals@zonnet.nl) Received: (qmail 13351 invoked by uid 10); 9 Apr 2005 16:19:00 -0000 Received: (vexira-qq 13345-AB320229 invoked from network) 09 Apr 2005 18:19:00 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([62.59.173.176]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp1.versatel.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for < >; 9 Apr 2005 16:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <42580075.6070400@zonnet.nl> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 18:19:01 +0200 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050302) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Davour References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.1.16; VAE: 6.30.0.2; VDF: 6.30.0.11; host: postbode01.zonnet.nl) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Italics not shown properly in OpenOffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:19:06 -0000 Andreas Davour wrote: > > Hi! > > I have a strange problem in OpenOffice 1.1.4 with italics. Text > formatted as italics doesn't show up in italics on screen. If I cut > and paste som text from an old document it hows up properly. This is > very strange, and a quite severe bug - if that's what it is. > > I searched the list and found no mentioning of it. Google found a > bugrapport for some debianthingie, but that was from 2003. > > Is it my system that's misbehaving, or OO? Is there something I can do > to fix this? Anyone? > > /andreas > Hm I found out there was a bug in OO.o 2 BETA when opening .xml files where bold and italic text were used, maybe its the same sort of problem ? this is the reported issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45111 If it is like that I tink it is a problem in OO.o itself Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:22:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4F916A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:22:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B6643D39 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:22:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [10.0.0.7] (dsl-228-111.dynamic-dsl.frii.net [216.17.228.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j39GMLDF012392; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:22:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <4257FFAB.4050705@vilot.com> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:15:39 -0600 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050330) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subhro References: <4257FC16.1080204@vilot.com> <4257FEEB.3040608@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4257FEEB.3040608@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: httpd.core X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:22:23 -0000 Thank you, Subhro, for such a quick response to my question. > For examining any core file you need a debugger. A very popular > debugger is the GNU Debugger also known as gdb Now ... the only problem is that if I examine the httpd.core file, it evidently has no debugging information in it (naturally): This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd". Core was generated by `httpd'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x2895e06c in ?? () How do I build Apache with debugging information? I see in the INSTALL file: Use the --without-execstrip option to disable the stripping of executables on installation. This can be important on some platforms in combination with --enable-rule=SHARED_CORE or when Apache was built with debugging symbols which shouldn't be lost. I assume I need that, too ... but I also am not clear on how to build apache13-modssl with the debug information ... Thank you in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:23:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B73516A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:23:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A987B43D39 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:23:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:02:43 -0500 Message-ID: <4257FD1B.60601@daleco.biz> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:04:43 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Matthias F. Brandstetter" References: <200504070941.42684.haimat@lame.at> <7c263b6d05040705363e39daa7@mail.gmail.com> <200504091737.44009.haimat@lame.at> In-Reply-To: <200504091737.44009.haimat@lame.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Apr 2005 16:02:43.0820 (UTC) FILETIME=[908972C0:01C53D1D] cc: Yoann Le Bihan cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to enable PHP on Apache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:23:52 -0000 Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote: >---------- quoting Yoann Le Bihan ---------- > > >>Hello ! :-) >> >>You just need to install mod_php port. It's located into >>/usr/ports/www (there are a mod_php4/ and a mod_php5/ directories). >>Just "make install clean" from one or two of these directories and it >>must be installed. Because I think it's not installed (even if it's >>mentionned in httpd.conf... it's strange by the way :-). >> >>Don't forget to make a "/usr/local/sbin/apachectl restart" after (if >>it's not already done from the port's installation). >> >> > >I did all you said, httpd-error.conf says: "Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) >mod_perl/1.29 PHP/4.3.11 configured -- resuming normal operations" > >But when I try to access my phpmyadmin installation Firefox asks me which >program I want to use to open this PHP file :( > >Any other ideas? >I am somewhat lost here :( > >Greetings and TIA, Matthias > > If you create a "normal" PHP page* under the Apache server's docroot (instead of in the phpmyadmin install, which is an alias), do you get the same behavior? Kevin Kinsey * like this: From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:24:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E527016A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:24:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCBD43D39 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:24:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from BLUELAPIS.sentex.ca (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id j39GOOiM006975 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 12:24:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 12:24:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20050409142457.83187.qmail@web31807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <44br8o3ru7.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44br8o3ru7.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: check for badblocks in hd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:24:26 -0000 On 09 Apr 2005 11:14:24 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: >Paulo Roberto writes: > >> I read the newfs man page but I couldn't find anything related to bad >> block checking. Is there a tool for doing it? > >Modern disks handle bad blocks internally, so they are not visible to >the operating system (until the disk is almost dead, anyway). There >are usually manufacturer tools for looking at it more closely, but by >and large, if you know you have bad blocks, it's time to get a new >disk. There is a FAQ entry on this, with considerably more >information. =20 Also if you are using 5.x, see the port=20 /usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools/ It can give you all sorts of info about your hard drive ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net Providing Internet Access since 1994 mike@sentex.net, (http://www.tancsa.com) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:28:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E2E16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:28:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA4343D2F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:28:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1082430wra for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:28:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=OlJuwgTjHY5sBjoR/nX1eklzFcZsOofCSyjbzANeMbR69JJSFC6GKX115wge0qEv+C5CEphTv1ZXqaEoRm5UIhCPqlPKgykm8Ly8dd13bwPPDAsWU1DVWYN0y32ASXykcjbnxjvyQqy/Kmm8e4IdS7jM9FQaqPB/a4ewKgS3Z0M= Received: by 10.54.15.51 with SMTP id 51mr587510wro; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.24.61 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 09:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:58:09 +0530 From: Subhro To: Tom Vilot In-Reply-To: <4257FFAB.4050705@vilot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4257FC16.1080204@vilot.com> <4257FEEB.3040608@gmail.com> <4257FFAB.4050705@vilot.com> cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: httpd.core X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:28:10 -0000 On Apr 9, 2005 9:45 PM, Tom Vilot wrote: > Thank you, Subhro, for such a quick response to my question. > > Now ... the only problem is that if I examine the httpd.core file, it > evidently has no debugging information in it (naturally): This is because you need to explicitly build debugging symbols in the binary. Otherwise the whole debugging procedure is very crippled > How do I build Apache with debugging information? For getting this information you need to read through the Makefile. Generally the compile time option is DEBUG. So the procudere would be make -DDEBUG -Dother_compile_options_as_required This also applies for Apache. Best Regards, S. -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:28:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F367316A4D2 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:28:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pernis.its.uu.se (pernis.its.UU.SE [130.238.4.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823B843D31 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:28:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by pernis.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 756333E7; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:28:14 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from pernis.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by pernis.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s335; Sat, 9 Apr 05 18:28:06 +0200 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by pernis.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26DA194; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:28:06 +0200 (MSZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id B1FDA38016; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:28:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD8A5C002; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:28:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:28:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Davour To: Frank Staals In-Reply-To: <42580075.6070400@zonnet.nl> Message-ID: References: <42580075.6070400@zonnet.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Italics not shown properly in OpenOffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:28:17 -0000 On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Frank Staals wrote: > Andreas Davour wrote: > >> >> Hi! >> >> I have a strange problem in OpenOffice 1.1.4 with italics. Text formatted >> as italics doesn't show up in italics on screen. If I cut and paste som >> text from an old document it hows up properly. This is very strange, and a >> quite severe bug - if that's what it is. >> >> I searched the list and found no mentioning of it. Google found a >> bugrapport for some debianthingie, but that was from 2003. >> >> Is it my system that's misbehaving, or OO? Is there something I can do to >> fix this? Anyone? > > Hm I found out there was a bug in OO.o 2 BETA when opening .xml files where > bold and italic text were used, maybe its the same sort of problem ? this is > the reported issue: > > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45111 > > If it is like that I tink it is a problem in OO.o itself It might be part of the same problem. I see the problem with involving any MS documents, though, so it isn't covered by that bug report. I didn't think it was just FreeBSD misbehaving. I'll send a report to OO about it. /andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:36:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1372916A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:36:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51001.mail.yahoo.com (web51001.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B159A43D1F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:36:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tfcheng@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 32152 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Apr 2005 16:36:04 -0000 Message-ID: <20050409163604.32150.qmail@web51001.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [129.49.86.137] by web51001.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 00:36:03 CST Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 00:36:03 +0800 (CST) From: "T.F. Cheng" To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: How to fix failed CRC file? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:36:05 -0000 Hi, I have downloaded some multimedia files from a news server, and they are usually coming in rar format and lots of pieces. I use par2repair to fix them, but one of the files failed, and reported to be CRC failed. Can anybody tell me how to fix this? thanks!! Best Regards, Tsu-Fan Cheng _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? µn°O§K¶Oªº @yahoo.com ¤¤¤å¹q¤l¶l¥ó @ http://chinese.mail.yahoo.com Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://chinese.mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:56:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7C516A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:56:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A8743D46 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:56:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lewiz@compsoc.man.ac.uk) Received: from kiki.compsoc.man.ac.uk ([192.84.78.5]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1DKJFq-0006Oy-0a; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 17:56:18 +0100 Received: from noisy.compsoc.man.ac.uk (noisy.compsoc.man.ac.uk [192.84.78.1]) by kiki.compsoc.man.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j39GuH4m029700 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:56:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from lewiz@noisy.compsoc.man.ac.uk) Received: (from lewiz@localhost) by noisy.compsoc.man.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j39GuCCQ091650; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:56:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from lewiz) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:56:12 +0100 From: Lewis Thompson To: Paul Waring Message-ID: <20050409165612.GA91236@noisy.compsoc.man.ac.uk> References: <8953a1db05040904263a1e2a79@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8953a1db05040904263a1e2a79@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/816/Sat Apr 9 01:46:45 2005 on kiki.compsoc.man.ac.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *1DKJFq-0006Oy-0a*ovFB.kGodFc* cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:56:19 -0000 On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Paul Waring wrote: > I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by > running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after > doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts > fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a > download for X.org. It is not portupgrade that needs X but a dependent port. Which specific port? In general just with WITHOUT_X11=1 to /etc/make.conf. Once you've got portupgrade installed you can control individual ports more specifically through editing pkgtools.conf in /usr/local/etc. -Lewis Thompson. -- I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. --Bob Dylan, 1964. -| msn:lewiz@fajita.org | jabber:lewiz@jabber.org | url:www.lewiz.org |- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 18:11:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542BB16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:11:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E279F43D2D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:11:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pwaring@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so936178rng for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:11:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=HBOMuUhazQVVdw/2bG/P4vSAj4LCL7WC0OjMIPjevCS1v5UQxw3uR0OJcl29oMFe+nDTbUMDj/vZtpoIxGRvxmye36yy7mxwNA4t5pbLx/X98soYTYM3sXmyTz0VnkulsriRl5PcZifT0FENkzPQHZVXsxOIAIwMxgCvvJOENZc= Received: by 10.38.13.58 with SMTP id 58mr755882rnm; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:11:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.76.66 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:11:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8953a1db0504091111ee5d1e1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 19:11:53 +0100 From: Paul Waring To: Glenn Dawson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050409092119.10aa0d10@cobalt.antimatter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8953a1db05040904263a1e2a79@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050409092119.10aa0d10@cobalt.antimatter.net> Subject: Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Waring List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 18:11:54 -0000 On Apr 9, 2005 5:23 PM, Glenn Dawson wrote: > adding WITHOUT_X11=yes to /etc/make.conf will keep all your ports from > trying to pull in X as a dependency. I use that on all my server systems > for exactly that reason. Cheers Glenn, that solved the problem (I was having the same issue with vim so I was glad to hear of a way to disable it globally). Paul -- Rogue Tory www.roguetory.org.uk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 18:44:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496EE16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:44:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35A643D2D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:44:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (c-67-174-105-242.hsd1.co.comcast.net [67.174.105.242]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j39IifGv001058 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:44:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <42582294.3050406@vilot.com> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 12:44:36 -0600 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050330) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Very confused X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 18:44:43 -0000 apache and the ports tree I find a bit confusing. I want: Apache with mod_perl and mod_ssl. I had apache with mod_ssl by installing apach13-modssl. But I kinda need mod_perl compiled in statically. If I deinstall apache13-modssl, and then install apache13-modperl, I don't have mod_ssl anymore. How do I install JUST mod_ssl? Or ... more specifically ... how do I install both? httpd -l Compiled-in modules: http_core.c mod_so.c mod_perl.c From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 19:00:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8DB16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 19:00:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F5043D2D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 19:00:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j39IxvJN058301; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:59:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:59:57 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Lis Message-ID: <20050409185957.GA284@dan.emsphone.com> References: <001101c53d05$c63e7540$0200a8c0@xp2400> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001101c53d05$c63e7540$0200a8c0@xp2400> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc 3.4.3 compile with fbsd 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 19:00:17 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 09), Lis said: > system: freebsd 5.3 with intel pentium 3 > > ok > 1) downloaded > 2) extracted > 3) mk objdir > 4) ../configure --prefix=/somewhere/ > 5) make bootstrap Is there a reason gcc-3.4.2 doesn't work? That's the version that comes with 5.3. If you really need 3.4.3, just build it from ports (lang/gcc34). -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 19:17:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FBC16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 19:16:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web88208.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web88208.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.37.223]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4C6D43D2D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 19:16:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msherman77@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20050409191659.37839.qmail@web88208.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.43.146.48] by web88208.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:16:59 EDT Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:16:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Sherman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: smssend/firewall port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 19:17:00 -0000 Hi all. I've installed the smssend program a few days back, it's a greate piece of software. However I wasn't able up till now to find out the TCP port number that it uses, in order to enable it with IPFilter. Does anyone have an idea? Thanks in advance. **** Dont let the bugs in, close the Windows **** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 19:23:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B1316A4CF for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 19:23:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D0A43D1D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 19:23:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.0.32] (charm.daemonsecurity.com [192.168.0.32]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F3DFD068; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:23:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42582BA6.5080002@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 21:23:18 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050314 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, en-gb, da, fr, de, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Vilot References: <42582294.3050406@vilot.com> In-Reply-To: <42582294.3050406@vilot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Very confused X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 19:23:34 -0000 Tom Vilot wrote: > apache and the ports tree I find a bit confusing. > > I want: Apache with mod_perl and mod_ssl. > > I had apache with mod_ssl by installing apach13-modssl. But I kinda need > mod_perl compiled in statically. > > If I deinstall apache13-modssl, and then install apache13-modperl, I > don't have mod_ssl anymore. > > How do I install JUST mod_ssl? Or ... more specifically ... how do I > install both? I think the whole mod_ means that you don't compile anything statically in. I installed apache13-modssl and then installed modperl separately, works fine. Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 20:03:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B90A16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:03:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBD043D1F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:03:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050409200314.ZEAC2192.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:03:14 -0400 From: To: "Michael Sherman" , Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:03:09 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050409191659.37839.qmail@web88208.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: smssend/firewall port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 20:03:16 -0000 Code a ipfilter rule to log all blocked packets then look at log for logged packets at time when you test smssend. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Michael Sherman Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 3:17 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: smssend/firewall port Hi all. I've installed the smssend program a few days back, it's a greate piece of software. However I wasn't able up till now to find out the TCP port number that it uses, in order to enable it with IPFilter. Does anyone have an idea? Thanks in advance. **** Dont let the bugs in, close the Windows **** _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 20:15:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED1616A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:15:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailweb02.ibest.com.br (mailweb02.ibest.com.br [200.181.68.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA6D43D2D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:15:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ricardo_j_candiotto@ibest.com.br) Received: from ibest.com.br (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailweb02.ibest.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6B8937AB for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:15:30 +0000 (GMT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 2.117 (F2.6; A1.50; B2.12; Q2.03) X-Mailer: IbestMail X-Organization: Ibest S/A X-Identity: 2628483_1113077730 From: ricardo_j_candiotto@ibest.com.br To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 17:15:30 -0300 Message-Id: <20050409201530.8A6B8937AB@mailweb02.ibest.com.br> Subject: ls colorized in freebsd csh?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 20:15:38 -0000 How do I use a ls colorized in FreeBSD 5.2.1??? In Linux I have a ls colorized how to do in FreeBSD csh??? Tks.. Conheça o novo iBest Acelerado e aumente a velocidade da sua navegação em até 5 vezes. O primeiro mês é gratuito. Basta acessar o endereço http://www.ibest.com.br/acelerado para se cadastrar. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 20:17:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6041116A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:17:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE8E43D49 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:17:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 014C251516; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:17:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:17:20 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: ricardo_j_candiotto@ibest.com.br Message-ID: <20050409201720.GA64540@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050409201530.8A6B8937AB@mailweb02.ibest.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050409201530.8A6B8937AB@mailweb02.ibest.com.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ls colorized in freebsd csh?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 20:17:22 -0000 --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 05:15:30PM -0300, ricardo_j_candiotto@ibest.com.br = wrote: > How do I use a ls colorized in FreeBSD 5.2.1??? ls -G, as described in the manpage.=20 > In Linux I have a ls colorized how to do in FreeBSD csh??? Your '?' key seems to be stuck; might want to look into that. Kris --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCWDhQWry0BWjoQKURAs01AJ48sEVfO2OZWd+Tz5o/fb9BJwD4BwCdGcYk N6+usgpjo4aeSiUotmaa2GY= =yvDB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 20:37:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4305A16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:37:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc14.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [216.148.227.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15EE43D3F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:37:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: from kirk.dlee.org ([69.143.16.144]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2005040920373301400lqfn3e>; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:37:33 +0000 Received: from kirk.dlee.org (dgl@localhost.dlee.org [127.0.0.1]) by kirk.dlee.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j39KbSiv058209 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:37:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: (from dgl@localhost) by kirk.dlee.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j39KbRnw058208 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:37:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dgl) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:37:27 -0400 From: Doug Lee To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050409203727.GI4670@kirk.dlee.org> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Lee , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: BART Group User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Anyone ever consider a filesystem served by MySQL for mail folders? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 20:37:34 -0000 Ok, tell me if this is a totally awful idea, but it seems quite useful to me, even if unusual... Is it practical to implement a mountable filesystem for mail archiving whose contents are served by a MySQL (or other SQL) database? Creating this is surely way beyond my level of expertise in FreeBSD, and maybe even the full design is, but I imagine this much: The actual supporting database would include category strings for each message (many-to-many). File names in the filesystem would be category strings, so saving an email would file it in that category (to save in several categories, resave to the corresponding names; only one actual copy of the message would be saved). Special rules could be constructed that allow special filename formats to cause queries; for example, trying to load messages from a file called "from:dgl@%" might pull in a mail file consisting of all messages from dgl@* (note I use `%', the SQL wildcard, both to simplify the query and to avoid collision with the normal `*' wildcard for filenames). I suggest the rule<-->filename mapping should be held in an administrator-modifiable configuration file. The reason I propose all this is that I'm interested in a better way to store massive amounts of email that does not depend on a particular mail program. Granted, the returned mail file format would have to be preset--unless that's configurable too, or special patterns are included for different formats compatible with different mailers, which would be immensely cool! I am continually frustrated by trying to find an email among hundreds of thousands of them, and by the inability to categorize emails in multiple ways easily without saving multiple copies of messages. I suddenly today thought of things like devfs, procfs, etc., that are pseudo-filesystems, and realized that even if this is an odd approach, it does have the benefit (at least potentially) of working with most any mail client with no modification to the client and no user intervention such as manually copying messages to/from the database. If such a thing now existed that could serve Mutt-compatible (MMDF, I think) mail files, I would wish to import about 400 megabytes of messages as soon as possible. :-) Thoughts welcome. Please Cc me. -- Doug Lee dgl@dlee.org http://www.dlee.org BART Group doug@bartsite.com http://www.bartsite.com "Innovation is hard to schedule." -- Dan Fylstra From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 20:44:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569BC16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:44:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD6343D31 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:44:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DKMlQ-00088f-42 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 22:41:08 +0200 Received: from 63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net ([63.224.222.139]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 22:41:08 +0200 Received: from sergei by 63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 22:41:08 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Sergei Gnezdov Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:37:22 -0700 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <8953a1db05040904263a1e2a79@mail.gmail.com> <20050409165612.GA91236@noisy.compsoc.man.ac.uk> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 63-224-222-139.spkn.qwest.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: sergei@gnezdov.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 20:44:13 -0000 On 2005-04-09, Lewis Thompson wrote: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Paul Waring wrote: >> I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by >> running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after >> doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts >> fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a >> download for X.org. > > It is not portupgrade that needs X but a dependent port. Which specific > port? In general just with WITHOUT_X11=1 to /etc/make.conf. I think it is WITHOUT_X11="YES" Does it make any difference? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 20:45:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858B916A50E for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:45:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A947043D41 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:45:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from pooh.nagual.st (pooh.nagual.st [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.st with esmtp; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 22:45:40 +0200 Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:45:41 +0200 From: dick hoogendijk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050409224541.3be660f6.dick@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: References: <20050408212553.GA24559@lothlorien.nagual.st> Organization: nagual SiTe X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: IPF Firewall Rules... help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dick@nagual.st List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 20:45:42 -0000 On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:43:23 -0400 bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > Dick > Since you say you have limewire working on your LAN behind firewall > why don't you post your rules so we can see how you did it. # Limewire pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 6346 flags S keep state pass out quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port = 6346 keep state That's really all there is to it. No funny things. Just installed limewire on all machines using the defaults. My ipnat.rules is also quit simple: # ### ipnat.rules # # FTP traffic for the internal LAN map rl0 192.168.11.0/24 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp # FTP traffic from the gateway map rl0 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp # non-FTP traffic for the internal LAN map rl0 192.168.11.0/24 -> 0/32 portmap tcp/udp auto map rl0 192.168.11.0/24 -> 0/32 That's all. And as said: limewire works like a charm. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 21:06:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E591A16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:06:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B59343D2F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:06:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (c-67-174-105-242.hsd1.co.comcast.net [67.174.105.242]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j39L5vRp042840; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:05:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <425843B5.3070301@vilot.com> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:05:57 -0600 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050330) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= References: <42582294.3050406@vilot.com> <42582BA6.5080002@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <42582BA6.5080002@locolomo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Very confused X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 21:06:09 -0000 Erik Nørgaard wrote: > I think the whole mod_ means that you don't compile anything > statically in. I installed apache13-modssl and then installed modperl > separately, works fine. I think I finally figured this out --- by having two different apache installs: one with ssl the other with perl. I want mod_perl compiled in statically. I have been finding that if I leave it as a loadable module, I get my signal 11 core dumps in Apache From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 21:22:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AE716A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:22:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532C743D2F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:22:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050409212208.QLPK7277.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:22:08 -0400 From: To: , Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:22:07 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050409224541.3be660f6.dick@nagual.st> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: IPF Firewall Rules... help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 21:22:10 -0000 Dick What you have working is only half of the product. Outbound works for me also but I have ports 6346, 6347, 6348 and 6349. What about the part of other internet users accessing your files. Watch the log and you will see limewire remote server trying to start session to your public ip address when you start limewire. Limewire software may not issue error message about remote users not being able to access your shared files but its is a problem that only happens when PC is nated on LAN. Here do this test, use lan PC to share files with another PC on your lan. I bet that will not work. Or have friend using limewire try to access your shared files on one of your lan pc's. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of dick hoogendijk Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 4:46 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPF Firewall Rules... help! On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:43:23 -0400 bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > Dick > Since you say you have limewire working on your LAN behind firewall > why don't you post your rules so we can see how you did it. # Limewire pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 6346 flags S keep state pass out quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port = 6346 keep state That's really all there is to it. No funny things. Just installed limewire on all machines using the defaults. My ipnat.rules is also quit simple: # ### ipnat.rules # # FTP traffic for the internal LAN map rl0 192.168.11.0/24 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp # FTP traffic from the gateway map rl0 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp # non-FTP traffic for the internal LAN map rl0 192.168.11.0/24 -> 0/32 portmap tcp/udp auto map rl0 192.168.11.0/24 -> 0/32 That's all. And as said: limewire works like a charm. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 21:26:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EEFC16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:26:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0124943D1F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:26:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lewiz@compsoc.man.ac.uk) Received: from kiki.compsoc.man.ac.uk ([192.84.78.5]) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1DKNTC-000Lx9-08; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 22:26:22 +0100 Received: from noisy.compsoc.man.ac.uk (noisy.compsoc.man.ac.uk [192.84.78.1]) by kiki.compsoc.man.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j39LQLUl033969 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:26:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from lewiz@noisy.compsoc.man.ac.uk) Received: (from lewiz@localhost) by noisy.compsoc.man.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j39LQHBF096070; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:26:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from lewiz) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:26:16 +0100 From: Lewis Thompson To: sergei@gnezdov.net Message-ID: <20050409212616.GA96041@noisy.compsoc.man.ac.uk> References: <8953a1db05040904263a1e2a79@mail.gmail.com> <20050409165612.GA91236@noisy.compsoc.man.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/816/Sat Apr 9 01:46:45 2005 on kiki.compsoc.man.ac.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *1DKNTC-000Lx9-08*QzacjyK6UaU* cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 21:26:23 -0000 On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:37:22PM -0700, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > I think it is > > WITHOUT_X11="YES" > > Does it make any difference? Not really. WITHOUT_X11=1 works perfectly for me. Just saves a little time typing it ;) -Lewis Thompson. -- I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. --Bob Dylan, 1964. -| msn:lewiz@fajita.org | jabber:lewiz@jabber.org | url:www.lewiz.org |- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 21:33:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C225116A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:33:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7624543D1F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:33:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6135E16; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:33:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77218-10; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:33:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-53-96.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.53.96]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA0F5DA0; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:33:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42584A22.9010209@mac.com> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 17:33:22 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Lee References: <20050409203727.GI4670@kirk.dlee.org> In-Reply-To: <20050409203727.GI4670@kirk.dlee.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone ever consider a filesystem served by MySQL for mail folders? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 21:33:30 -0000 Doug Lee wrote: > Ok, tell me if this is a totally awful idea, but it seems quite useful > to me, even if unusual... It's a totally awful idea. :-) > Is it practical to implement a mountable filesystem for mail archiving > whose contents are served by a MySQL (or other SQL) database? > Creating this is surely way beyond my level of expertise in FreeBSD, > and maybe even the full design is, but I imagine this much: > > The actual supporting database would include category strings for each > message (many-to-many). File names in the filesystem would be > category strings, so saving an email would file it in that category > (to save in several categories, resave to the corresponding names; > only one actual copy of the message would be saved). [ ... ] Using a database backend for mail storage and to provide fancy searching and the like is the architecture used to build Microsoft Exchange and Lotus Notes. The advantage is that users gets fancy searching. The disadvantage is that you need to provide around 4 times as much disk space for a DB-based mailstore as you would for a normal mbox/maildir style representation, you need to provide a lot more server horsepower, you need to continuously maintain and purge old mail from the database, and you end up with your mail buried in database tables, so heaven help you if the database becomes inconsistent and you need to recover. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 21:43:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D9F16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:43:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C793843D3F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:43:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD6CF51379; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 14:43:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 14:43:20 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: sergei@gnezdov.net Message-ID: <20050409214320.GA81681@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <8953a1db05040904263a1e2a79@mail.gmail.com> <20050409165612.GA91236@noisy.compsoc.man.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 21:43:22 -0000 --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:37:22PM -0700, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > On 2005-04-09, Lewis Thompson wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Paul Waring wrote: > >> I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by > >> running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after > >> doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts > >> fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a > >> download for X.org. > > > > It is not portupgrade that needs X but a dependent port. Which specific > > port? In general just with WITHOUT_X11=3D1 to /etc/make.conf. >=20 > I think it is >=20 > WITHOUT_X11=3D"YES" >=20 > Does it make any difference? No, the value for such variables is unimportant (WITHOUT_X11=3D"NO" works just as well) Kris --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCWEx4Wry0BWjoQKURAmxwAKDMujn6H/rDmiZYt2hfFZ/hABlLEACgi2L3 OelXFNq6r/BO60eo6WgZoQw= =a29Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 21:55:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A918316A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:55:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CC643D1F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:55:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.0.32] (charm.daemonsecurity.com [192.168.0.32]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EAFFD021; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:55:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42584F30.7060106@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 23:54:56 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050314 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, en-gb, da, fr, de, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Vilot References: <42582294.3050406@vilot.com> <42582BA6.5080002@locolomo.org> <425843B5.3070301@vilot.com> In-Reply-To: <425843B5.3070301@vilot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Very confused X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 21:55:16 -0000 Tom Vilot wrote: > I think I finally figured this out --- by having two different apache > installs: one with ssl the other with perl. installing both apache13-modssl and apache13-modperl could/should cause problems - they should be marked as conflicting, if not submit a pr. Installing apache13-modssl and mod_perl should not cause a problem, this is the solution I am refering to. > I want mod_perl compiled in statically. I have been finding that if I > leave it as a loadable module, I get my signal 11 core dumps in Apache If you get a coredump then please investigate the problem, submit here or submit a problem report. I must say that I have installed mod_perl mostly to have it supported since my dynamic web is still php. However, I have tested and it works fine. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 21:57:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47D216A4CE; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:57:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from flake.decibel.org (flake.decibel.org [67.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F3D43D46; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:57:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from decibel@decibel.org) Received: by flake.decibel.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5EF8E1522F; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:57:49 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:57:49 -0500 From: "Jim C. Nasby" To: Danny Howard Message-ID: <20050409215749.GH93835@decibel.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jim C. Nasby" , Danny Howard , FreeBSD questions , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <4256EC7A.5060107@toldme.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4256EC7A.5060107@toldme.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE i386 X-Distributed: Join the Effort! http://www.distributed.net User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: (LONG) ATA Benchmark: 5.x Reads Slower than Writes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 21:57:51 -0000 Have you been certain to disable write caching on the drives? If not I bet that's what you're seeing (which also means you're begging for database corruption). -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 22:08:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341F016A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:08:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC92143D1F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:08:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pcgeek86@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so313706wri for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:08:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uUe65ca2c6RTTXCdIT7b3bL3C1uJiTIdggvAdA+/AxwemjTkJ1+LD67QaAShyUWzQ3p3cXq9xJG1q9qBM1GXWL5jYaaUZIY3bH2zjSCyRZPbNtlFrAc3OJIBN7Eyr836I3rs5te9PYU1ctgucPJqtPDt6LGvsK/GRjrj4Wc/wcM= Received: by 10.54.55.61 with SMTP id d61mr1106071wra; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.100.100.15? ([66.93.248.53]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 33sm804817wra.2005.04.09.15.08.52; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4258552A.1080703@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 17:20:26 -0500 From: Trevor Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, bsdneophyte@yahoo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 5.3 random reboot problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 22:08:59 -0000 Hi I'm having the same problem as the person in the following post: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-January/072548.html My problem is with a Compaq Proliant DL380, and a fresh (standard) installation of FreeBSD 5.3. I've had several quirks on it that I haven't really understood, but after doing some research it seems like the older Proliant servers had some hardware compatibility issues with the FreeBSD 5 branch. My server is randomly rebooting when I try to do almost anything on it (I was trying to create a custom kernel post-install) and even just modifying a configuration file caused it to reboot. It's getting really irritating, and it had no problems with several different linux installations. I don't want to go back to FreeBSD 4, but if I must....thanks for any help, any ideas? -Trevor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 22:30:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617B216A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:30:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.202.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDB943D39 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:30:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: from kirk.dlee.org ([69.143.16.144]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20050409223003014000nj6me>; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:30:03 +0000 Received: from kirk.dlee.org (dgl@localhost.dlee.org [127.0.0.1]) by kirk.dlee.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j39MU2Jn058977; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:30:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: (from dgl@localhost) by kirk.dlee.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j39MU2sX058976; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:30:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dgl) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:30:01 -0400 From: Doug Lee To: Chuck Swiger Message-ID: <20050409223001.GA58918@kirk.dlee.org> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Lee , Chuck Swiger , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050409203727.GI4670@kirk.dlee.org> <42584A22.9010209@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42584A22.9010209@mac.com> Organization: BART Group User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone ever consider a filesystem served by MySQL for mail folders? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 22:30:05 -0000 On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 05:33:22PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote: Doug Lee wrote: >Is it practical to implement a mountable filesystem for mail archiving >whose contents are served by a MySQL (or other SQL) database? >Creating this is surely way beyond my level of expertise in FreeBSD, >and maybe even the full design is, but I imagine this much: > >The actual supporting database would include category strings for each >message (many-to-many). File names in the filesystem would be >category strings, so saving an email would file it in that category >(to save in several categories, resave to the corresponding names; >only one actual copy of the message would be saved). [ ... ] Using a database backend for mail storage and to provide fancy searching and the like is the architecture used to build Microsoft Exchange and Lotus Notes. The advantage is that users gets fancy searching. The disadvantage is that you need to provide around 4 times as much disk space for a DB-based mailstore as you would for a normal mbox/maildir style representation, you need to provide a lot more server horsepower, you need to continuously maintain and purge old mail from the database, and you end up with your mail buried in database tables, so heaven help you if the database becomes inconsistent and you need to recover. Horsepower yes, trouble if things become inconsistent yes, purging requirements not really (you are entitled to just as much hoarding under either system ) ... But as for increased storage requirements, I've always wondered how much could be saved by an intelligent method of behind-the-scenes handling of quoting among messages in a thread. Goodness knows half the mail on a lot of lists, and even in a lot of personal mail streams, is simply copies of some or all of other messages, perhaps shifted over by quote signs like `>' etc. Seems to me a system could be devised to store directions for rebuilding a message instead of the message itself with all quoting intact. Dangerous, in need of a LOT of testing before production use, likely not to catch all possible cases because of, for example, people who like unique quoting prefixes (:P) etc. etc... but I think still feasible. I don't know how much could be gained, but I wouldn't be surprised if it could reverse the increased storage requirements you mention. -- Doug Lee dgl@dlee.org http://www.dlee.org BART Group doug@bartsite.com http://www.bartsite.com "It's not easy to be crafty and winsome at the same time, and few accomplish it after the age of six." --John W. Gardner and Francesca Gardner Reese From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 22:45:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2349A16A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:45:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871C443D1D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:45:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from khaled.abu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1118601wra for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:45:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=G/Jl/u7lDHUFX8GNyr0e8648fqp8pTWgsMeouGtE2PCdGBJLRz6Z2h8qdS8rChP2UGykz50OyA56jKh77VLbppW+STH7OHUyHvEmpXl0/P7fI5CWuyupgNPMC6N/Fu5x/p9ajrkyOFznFwsw6BHUru4kRzzZRlLW3pfJpgHjnEg= Received: by 10.54.50.73 with SMTP id x73mr873639wrx; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.67.7 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 01:45:23 +0300 From: Abu Khaled To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20050409201720.GA64540@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050409201530.8A6B8937AB@mailweb02.ibest.com.br> <20050409201720.GA64540@xor.obsecurity.org> cc: ricardo_j_candiotto@ibest.com.br cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ls colorized in freebsd csh?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Abu Khaled List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 22:45:24 -0000 On Apr 9, 2005 11:17 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 05:15:30PM -0300, ricardo_j_candiotto@ibest.com.br wrote: > > How do I use a ls colorized in FreeBSD 5.2.1??? > > ls -G, as described in the manpage. > > > In Linux I have a ls colorized how to do in FreeBSD csh??? > > Your '?' key seems to be stuck; might want to look into that. > > Kris > > > You can also add "setenv CLICOLOR" to ".cshrc" in your home directory. # cd ~ # ee .cshrc this well open the file for editing. add setenv CLICOLOR 1 -- Kind regards Abu Khaled From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 22:52:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B4016A4F0 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:52:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02ADF43D2F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:52:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pergesu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so2275750wra for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:52:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=rTTJkEAX3cqr9ym0NlfCcg1gdd16ltuCUukz6N2oVkpSBbvtfPDo8/7fBwFLskWXDQ50eRqbWuLtG868TBKyybPyPcX96oLTt6nfijeUYQv7MbApy3zB7OE4C9nq7/vxsp6v+xZ9RCtBLtaaASALnKEp9ArCE0buk3M8PT0IOFQ= Received: by 10.54.63.10 with SMTP id l10mr1186246wra; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:52:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.42.28 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:52:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <810a540e05040915526751b184@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:52:34 -0600 From: Pat Maddox To: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8953a1db05040904263a1e2a79@mail.gmail.com> <20050409165612.GA91236@noisy.compsoc.man.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pat Maddox List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 22:52:36 -0000 The only thing that matters is that WITHOUT_X11 is defined. The value itself doesn't matter. On Apr 9, 2005 2:37 PM, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > On 2005-04-09, Lewis Thompson wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Paul Waring wrote: > >> I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by > >> running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after > >> doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts > >> fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a > >> download for X.org. > > > > It is not portupgrade that needs X but a dependent port. Which specific > > port? In general just with WITHOUT_X11=1 to /etc/make.conf. > > I think it is > > WITHOUT_X11="YES" > > Does it make any difference? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 23:04:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB5316A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:04:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BDB43D39 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:04:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so967050rng for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:04:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mJX9joEpIE5Qyv1tFbDML+/MIroUAr5F6/DWTS+xHpGWxtkgmEJpx0wT57DQkUXemK2jxFTsautBcLZKlCcaZ3M6cae3ENZwGBVHPHCUqzLxUi1fTDEuSAa13+XQ3GfGGrhtOgXAtq80oJnRlPYWL1klzomD3YLlHV12Oz+O0q4= Received: by 10.38.152.48 with SMTP id z48mr2786610rnd; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 01:04:29 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: egetty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 23:04:30 -0000 Where can i find egetty ? TB-14R pwd /usr/ports TB-14R make search key=egetty TB-14R From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 23:07:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1708016A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:07:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA93E43D2D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:07:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so967352rng for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:07:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Urhc3Lko33x3kWtyvqGb4dEeXYToNjOTc5Oo7/9bh1frBlSlwjCChrdBZhGVD9AO/Chz/k4tUlMigjrtO9RqX/D8BEuwCItEqkAR5fX2YYlsSKqMuu8OB35O7/INzk3qcuPbe3iUVguqRECHRxc2/74kx6gWNGJ+aDoCfuV7QIM= Received: by 10.38.71.62 with SMTP id t62mr1630726rna; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:07:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:07:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 01:07:07 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: Subject: Re: egetty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 23:07:08 -0000 On Apr 10, 2005 1:04 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > Where can i find egetty ? > > TB-14R pwd > /usr/ports > TB-14R make search key=egetty > TB-14R > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=egetty&stype=all&release=5-STABLE%2Fi386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 23:33:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8552216A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:33:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0746843D39 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:33:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.65.223]) by mta11.adelphia.netESMTP <20050409233352.HPCJ5402.mta11.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net> for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 19:33:52 -0400 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 105E6B522; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 19:33:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 19:33:59 -0400 From: Parv To: f-q Message-ID: <20050409233359.GA4703@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: f-q Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: IPSec-over-802.11[bg] between clients & router/AP of some sort X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 23:33:53 -0000 Could somebody recommend a device (router/AP) which will make IPSec-over-802.11[bg] connections w/ LAN clients (around USD150)? Netopia 3387W-ENT seems to be one of those ... http://www.pcmall.com/pcmall/shop/detail~dpno~278586.asp http://www.netopia.com/support/resources/option_3387went.html ... Could somebody confirm if Windows XP and FreeBSD 5.x LAN clients could connect via IPSec over 802.11b to have wireless connectivity? Any other suggestions? (For one, how does one get hands on a Netopia 3300-VGx device?) - Parv --