From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Nov 27 19:15:42 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA25621
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 27 Nov 1995 19:15:42 -0800
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA25615
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Nov 1995 19:15:37 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA23136; Mon, 27 Nov 1995 11:14:45 -0800
Message-Id: <199511271914.LAA23136@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: rah.star-gate.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TCP) <lyndon@orthanc.com>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on the install and on Red Hat Linux. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 27 Nov 1995 13:29:40 PST."
             <199511272129.NAA21361@multivac.orthanc.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 11:14:44 -0800
From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>>> Lyndon Nerenberg said:
 > >>>>> "Amancio" == Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> writes:
 > 
 >     Amancio> BTW: exmh has a cool installation procedure someone can
 >     Amancio> take a look.  Yes, I know that it is probably not a one
 >     Amancio> to one match to an OS installation however the overall
 >     Amancio> general procedure is cool.
 > 
 > Exmh has a rediculous installation interface that makes it impossible
 > to install using make. Why oh why do people insist on reinventing make?

Cool , if you think using make for installing exmh is such a great idea
why don't you post on exmh-workers@Sun.COM.

Besides you missed the whole point --- to install an interactive package
or relevant to the thread an  operating system....

	Amancio