Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 07:41:46 +1100 From: John Paul Lonie <jp@zip.com.au> To: Jay Nelson <jdn@acp.qiv.com> Cc: Robert Withrow <witr@rwwa.com>, "Michael V. Harding" <mvh@netcom.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 'Code Freeze' Message-ID: <3516C909.8D9EE568@zip.com.au> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980318221246.1621A-100000@acp.qiv.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jay Nelson wrote: > Let me add my paltry two bits in concurrance. From what I've seen. > 2.1.7 is _stable_ though ignored. 2.2.X seems to be current and 3.0, > or whatever is beyond, seems to be a work in progress. Truth is, 2.1.7 > does everything I need done. If I had to make a choice of versions to > put into a demanding environment for which I had to take > responsibility, it would be 2.1.7. We have a 2.1.7 box running as a web server which has had 410 days uptime. It is the most stable bit of hardware we have. Even our cisco 4000M has less uptime (mainly because the cpu in it failed) and boy wasn't that fun ... not To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3516C909.8D9EE568>