Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:09:58 -0000 From: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk> To: "Chris Rees" <utisoft@gmail.com>, "Kostik Belousov" <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding dependency on mountlate to mountd Message-ID: <1F93E0D525B946B88405EC4203385E0A@multiplay.co.uk> References: <6A58ADA440454E5889DBA6D2D9C56180@multiplay.co.uk><CAF6rxg=UoSONKXLub7RFTK6Hi7oXRgJ0c7gvhOXW53sa2h964Q@mail.gmail.com><20121215091424.GS71906@kib.kiev.ua> <CADLo839yEpvMC_BhBzmJ2heNtdUtNHCQymqho4AkJP0hVfdr5g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
---- Original Message -----
> From: Chris Rees
> On 15 Dec 2012 09:14, "Konstantin Belousov" <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It cannot be fine. It breaks local NFS mounts.
>
> Given that we can't have both, but we can have nullfs and thus solve this problem.
> Is there something that local NFS mounts can do that nullfs won't?
Using local NFS mounts seems a bit of strange thing to do, whats the
reason for the requirement for these?
Wouldnt nullfs mounts replace this requirement and perform better?
Regards
Steve
================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it.
In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337
or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1F93E0D525B946B88405EC4203385E0A>