From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Nov  2  8:27:24 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from india.citi.umich.edu (india.citi.umich.edu [141.211.92.147])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0C70615633; Tue,  2 Nov 1999 08:27:06 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from provos@citi.umich.edu)
Received: from citi.umich.edu (IDENT:provos@india.citi.umich.edu [141.211.92.147])
	by india.citi.umich.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA16383;
	Tue, 2 Nov 1999 11:27:04 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199911021627.LAA16383@india.citi.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: OpenSSH patches 
From: Niels Provos <provos@citi.umich.edu>
In-Reply-To: Dug Song, Tue, 02 Nov 1999 10:51:43 EST
To: Dug Song <dugsong@monkey.org>
Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, markus@openbsd.org
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1999 11:27:04 -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

In message <Pine.BSO.4.10.9911021016190.1191-100000@funky.monkey.org>, Dug Song
 writes:
>On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Niels Provos wrote:
>> One of them, already convincing enough by itself, is the free
>> commercial use.
>not within the US, though. :-(
I was actually refering to the fact, that the OpenSSH sources are not
covered by a restrictive license.  Whereas ssh-1.2.27 does not allow
commerical use without a license from Data Fellows.

Greetings,
 Niels.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message