Date: Thu, 5 Oct 1995 19:19:42 -0700 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: ache@astral.msk.su Cc: ache@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/ncftp2/pkg COMMENT Message-ID: <199510060219.TAA18882@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <AnJ1-Sm4i2@ache.dialup.demos.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* It is neccessary in this case, this version merges some local FreeBSD hacks * and filename completion into official stream minimize potential * problems which can occurse. I don't understand. We had a perfectly functional 2.1.1 port, with "local hacks". What "potential problems" can occur by leaving it that way? I'll let this one go, but please keep changes to the minimum, okay? You always seem to trample on other people's feet come release time, and I'm frankly getting a little annoyed by that. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510060219.TAA18882>