From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 29 16:30:29 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A3616A4B3
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 864E643FF9
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 78672 invoked by uid 1000); 29 Sep 2003 23:30:30 -0000
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030929203636.24DEA5D09@ptavv.es.net>
Message-ID: <20030929162952.C78670@root.org>
References: <20030929203636.24DEA5D09@ptavv.es.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 2706] Re: Odd ACPI behavior 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:30:29 -0000

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
> > ACPI attaches the bus twice.  See sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c:
> >
> >     /*
> >      * Scan all of the child devices we have created and let them probe/attach.
> >      */
> >     ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_OBJECTS, "first bus_generic_attach\n"));
> >     bus_generic_attach(bus);
> >
> >     /*
> >      * Some of these children may have attached others as part of their attach
> >      * process (eg. the root PCI bus driver), so rescan.
> >      */
> >     ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_OBJECTS, "second bus_generic_attach\n"));
> >     bus_generic_attach(bus);
>
> Thanks. That explains why I get the message twice, but why do I get it
> at all when the device is disabled in the device.hints file?

Dunno.  That's probably an sio(4) problem.  It does that on my laptop
also.

-Nate