Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 18:49:46 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disenchanted with ZFS; alternatives? Message-ID: <20081201184722.S10680@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <200812010959.15647.kirk@strauser.com> References: <200812010959.15647.kirk@strauser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I have ZFS on my 7.1-PRERELEASE system, and while it does some spiffy things, > in general I'm a bit underwhelmed. UFS is excellent. your problem is that you like to have "lots of filesystems". why don't just make one or one per disk? i have one per disk/mirror configuration everywhere except one place where i made separate filesystem for /var/spool/squid for some reasons. tell me what's your needs and how many/what disks you have. UFS is best-performer on real load, runs on almost no RAM, but uses more if available for caching.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081201184722.S10680>