From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 14:18:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E261065670 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:18:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049A28FC08 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PANsX-0001lf-Hv for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:18:25 -0700 Message-ID: <30048354.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:18:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jakub_lach@mailplus.pl References: <29978939.post@talk.nabble.com> Subject: Re: cdrtools /devel and wodim broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:18:27 -0000 Warren Block wrote: > > I've had mixed success with cdrecord (sysutils/cdrtools-devel) over the > years. Although growisofs is reputed to be less correct, I can't recall > it ever having a problem. > Isn't cdrtools dependency of growisofs? regards, - Jakub Lach -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/cdrtools--devel-and-wodim-broken-tp29978939p30048354.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.