From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 14:38:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E603106566C for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 14:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C8B8FC0A for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 14:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf2 with SMTP id 2so840941gyf.13 for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:38:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dPZGWBSCoBXrRmKHk3ZOkUwf/nGA4xCOwSPa9BcSpRA=; b=BWEfgI6HzRUDnA4kQ+gtGT/sEDYg/ErwtJT/JgYSVZn6WQRpD1dyvYhWs0tYsy91b5 Hrb9b+4lER3UOWi9T4UJ4L/HY6tNQH6dOh2Hos+cFFtwWAZERpTbYc3R1Evr9GI6zMo2 mZbCO3JzkLpdzN8pBBm549uB+DDdzAnc584eU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.37.230 with SMTP id y66mr5022261yha.10.1315492716224; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.103.6 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 07:38:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <458771414.20110908183656@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <663133681.20110907193747@serebryakov.spb.ru> <437702009.20110907235248@serebryakov.spb.ru> <426917282.20110908125907@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4610390305.20110908154130@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1705262661.20110908180850@serebryakov.spb.ru> <458771414.20110908183656@serebryakov.spb.ru> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 22:38:36 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: k5q9X-U2675_oPHy5LjoDKqsHUk Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Lev Serebryakov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AP performance (again): txpower regulation X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:38:37 -0000 2011/9/8 Lev Serebryakov : > Hello, Adrian. > You wrote 8 =D3=C5=CE=D4=D1=C2=D2=D1 2011 =C7., 18:22:38: > >> Oi, he shouldn't be breaking regulatory requirements! :) > =9AI afraid, that 600mW card + 10dB antenna ALREADY out of regulatory > requirements, as it more than non-licensable 100mW :) You'd be very surprised how sensitive wireless NICs are. If this is just for a home access point then it's very unlikely you need a 600mW card. I get 130mbit from all places in my apartment .. with a non-high power 11n NIC. :) Adrian