From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 29 01:52:35 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468A75B7BEE for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wa5qjh@xmission.com) Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F7wZB2nXlz4Qvg for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:52:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wa5qjh@xmission.com) Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lQh4x-00Gli2-Ok for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:52:31 -0600 Received: from [175.176.70.2] (helo=[192.168.5.102]) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lQh4w-00FuBo-JF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:52:31 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: wa5qjh Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:52:25 +0800 Message-Id: <92E68329-299D-4AB9-B7A3-CABECC7A7004@xmission.com> References: In-Reply-To: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: iPad Mail (18B92) X-XM-SPF: eid=1lQh4w-00FuBo-JF; ; ; mid=<92E68329-299D-4AB9-B7A3-CABECC7A7004@xmission.com>; ; ; hst=in02.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=175.176.70.2; ; ; frm=wa5qjh@xmission.com; ; ; spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18sVN5qbSQE8JtJMGH9bxDj X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 175.176.70.2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wa5qjh@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa03.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.3 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,TR_XM_PhishingBody,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,XMNumbers, XMPhish14,XM_B_Unicode,XM_B_Unsub autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5350] * 2.0 XMPhish14 BODY: Reference to webmail upgrade * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa03 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 1.0 XMNumbers Suspicious email with numbers in From & Subject * 0.5 XM_B_Unsub Unsubscribe in body of email but missing unsubscribe * header * 0.0 TR_XM_PhishingBody Phishing flag in body of message X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa03 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ***;freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 641 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 4.8 (0.7%), b_tie_ro: 3.3 (0.5%), parse: 1.10 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 14 (2.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 3.1 (0.5%), tests_pri_-1000: 11 (1.7%), tests_pri_-950: 1.08 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 0.82 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 291 (45.4%), check_bayes: 287 (44.8%), b_tokenize: 6 (0.9%), b_tok_get_all: 8 (1.3%), b_comp_prob: 2.2 (0.3%), b_tok_touch_all: 267 (41.7%), b_finish: 0.78 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 303 (47.3%), check_dkim_signature: 0.40 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.3 (0.4%), poll_dns_idle: 0.72 (0.1%), tests_pri_10: 2.6 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 8 (1.3%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 876, Issue 9 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4F7wZB2nXlz4Qvg X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=xmission.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wa5qjh@xmission.com designates 166.70.13.231 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wa5qjh@xmission.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.40 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[166.70.13.231:from]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[166.70.13.231:from]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[166.70.13.231:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:166.70.13.0/24]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[xmission.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6315, ipnet:166.70.0.0/16, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[166.70.13.231:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:52:35 -0000 It tells you that continuing the download at this time is futile, go do some= thing else. waiting , attempting to download the whole thing again, and it w= ill even if cached and ive watched it download it all again, means you have t= o spend all that time waiting to see if its going to finish or not. Believe m= e, Its a big time and (precious) bandwidth waster! I've seen it get to 99% d= ownloaded then declared a file size mismatch and fetch as used, doesn't empl= oy the resume feature so whatever was downloaded last time isn't used the ne= xt even if only 2 minutes prior. partial downloads are not cached. I'm rather curious tho, since I'm pretty certain theres a good reason for= making the big downloads at or near last, what is it? ( no, seriously, why?= not being snarky here or anywhere in this message, honest! no time or patie= nce for that!) Gary Corell Ya gotta see time beyond the end of your nose > On Mar 28, 2021, at 20:00, freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFSend freebsd-questions mailing list submissions to > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >=20 > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org >=20 > You can reach the person managing the list at > freebsd-questions-owner@freebsd.org >=20 > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of freebsd-questions digest..." >=20 >=20 > Today's Topics: >=20 > 1. Re: arm64 FreeBSD13-RC3 /home vs, /usr/home (RW) >=20 >=20 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >=20 > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 15:19:35 +0000 > From: RW > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: arm64 FreeBSD13-RC3 /home vs, /usr/home > Message-ID: <20210327151935.6d928120@gumby.homeunix.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUS-ASCII >=20 >> On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 10:28:50 +0800 >> wa5qjh wrote: >>=20 >> and as a user in the boonies with mostly bad internet, may I >> request that in package scripts, larger items like llvm10 be fetched >> very early on instead of nearly last, please! If llvm fails to fetch, >> all that was fetched previously is wasted when you make the attempt >> again.=20 >=20 > Why is it wasted? If you rerun "pkg upgrade" the downloaded files will > be locally cached.=20 >=20 > Even if that weren't true, downloading the larger files first doesn't > give you any benefit, since you have to download them all before > pkg proceeds with installing. >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------ >=20 > Subject: Digest Footer >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------ >=20 > End of freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 876, Issue 9 > *************************************************