From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 8 01:48:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057BC1065675; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 01:48:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-150-251.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C190614EBBF; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 01:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F31D475.3030307@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:48:37 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120201 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Scheidell References: <4F31D347.9060509@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F31D347.9060509@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: helping out INDEX builds. best practices? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:48:39 -0000 On 02/07/2012 17:43, Michael Scheidell wrote: > if a certain port needs to be kept in sync with another portversion, > other than putting a comment in the main port "# must bump portversion > in port..." where you have two maintainers, is there a better way to do > this? Take a look at editors/xxe and editors/xml2rfc-xxe hth, Doug -- It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/