Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:26:57 +1000 From: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Waschb=c3=bcsch?= <martin@waschbuesch.de>, Euan Thoms <euan@potensol.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Walter Schwarzenfeld <w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at> Subject: Re: devel/sope: make (stage-qa) now fails with DEVELOPER=yes complaining about iconv dependency Message-ID: <a9c1c4ab-b040-5412-1570-b2ae9f34723a@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <A54D23F5-ABDB-48F9-B7E6-72EF3DA13DFA@waschbuesch.de> References: <7c8b-57880400-7-6b8b4580@127157238> <A54D23F5-ABDB-48F9-B7E6-72EF3DA13DFA@waschbuesch.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15/07/2016 5:17 PM, Martin Waschbüsch wrote: > >> Am 14.07.2016 um 23:29 schrieb Euan Thoms <euan@potensol.com>: >> >> >> On Friday, July 15, 2016 01:11 SGT, Walter Schwarzenfeld >> <w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at> wrote: >> >>> I think this statements should be only warnings. Cause not all >>> of these statements are right and each maintianer should decide >>> which "USES" or "LIB_DEPENDS" are necessairely and which not. >> >> Well, I don't know enough to comment about whether it should be >> classed as a warning or an error. But there's definetely a bug in >> the ports Mk system, since adding USES+=iconv does not remove the >> error. I don't think I even need iconv as a dependency, it should >> be included lower down in the dependency tree. > > I am not sure about this. At the very least, sope-core does use iconv > in its NGExtensions (e.g. NSString+Encoding.m). Can we really assume > some lower dependency package already pulls iconv in? If something in a port links to libiconv (or anything else), then the dependency should be registered in that port
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a9c1c4ab-b040-5412-1570-b2ae9f34723a>