Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 12:59:02 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Yaroslav Terletsky <ts@polynet.lviv.ua> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>, altq@csl.sony.co.jp Subject: Re: Panic with 3.4: rtfree Message-ID: <20000124125902.E26520@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1000124182003.5726B-100000@NetSurfer.lp.lviv.ua>; from ts@polynet.lviv.ua on Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 06:51:11PM %2B0200 References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1000124182003.5726B-100000@NetSurfer.lp.lviv.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Yaroslav Terletsky <ts@polynet.lviv.ua> [000124 09:44] wrote:
>
> Dear Coders,
>
> One of my routers being upgraded to 3.4-STABLE (as of Dec 30 1999)
> crashes *very* often with panic("rtfree");
> (With old 2.2.2 branch it works ok.)
>
> It is cool in testing evnironment but after few minutes in real cond.
> (I think due to higher traffic and RT manipulations) it crashes.
> My RT is about 70 entries in size, maxusers 32, NMBCLUSTERS=2048.
> I'm also using ALTQ 2.0 (it does not patch sys/net/route.c).
>
> Any suggestions why it is and how to fix this problem?
Why do you have such a low maxusers/NMBCLUSTERS setting?
I can understand the maxusers, but lowering NMBCLUSTERS on a router
doesn't seem like the right thing to do.
-Alfred
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000124125902.E26520>