Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Jul 2002 07:28:08 -0700
From:      Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
To:        Dan Pelleg <daniel+bsd@pelleg.org>
Cc:        ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ipfw2 patches for -stable available
Message-ID:  <20020710072808.B94159@iguana.icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <15660.16374.50102.170751@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu>; from daniel+bsd@pelleg.org on Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:08:54AM -0400
References:  <20020709023203.A83270@iguana.icir.org> <u2sy9ckpbo1.fsf@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu> <20020709221347.A91104@iguana.icir.org> <15660.2959.142937.827544@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20020710062146.A93900@iguana.icir.org> <15660.16374.50102.170751@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:08:54AM -0400, Dan Pelleg wrote:
...
>  > In the meantime could you check if removing "keep-state" from
>  > the limit rules still causes the problem ?
> 
> Removing keep-state seems to solve the problem. Thanks!

the good thing is that without a single exception, all the bugs
reported so far are responsibility of the userland code, not the
kernel :)

	cheers
	luigi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020710072808.B94159>