From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Feb 7 05:38:39 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id FAA28881 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 05:38:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from Relay1.Austria.EU.net (relay1.Austria.EU.net [192.92.138.47]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id FAA28870 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 05:38:34 -0800 (PST) From: marino.ladavac@aut.alcatel.at Received: from atusks01.aut.alcatel.at by Relay1.Austria.EU.net with SMTP id AA18691 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for ); Wed, 7 Feb 1996 14:38:22 +0100 Received: from atuhc16 by atusks01.aut.alcatel.at (4.1/SMI-4.1/AAA-1.29/main) id AA06093; Wed, 7 Feb 96 14:37:47 +0100 Message-Id: <9602071337.AA06093@atuhc16.atusks01.aut.alcatel.at> Received: by atuhc16 (1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA29608; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 14:37:44 +0100 Subject: Re: Can FreeBSD be used in a commercial way? To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 96 14:37:43 MET Cc: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199602062038.NAA03259@phaeton.artisoft.com>; from "Terry Lambert" at Feb 6, 96 1:38 pm Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85] Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > 3) You have to include the credit clauses for everyone in the > sources for the components you use. This should take one > or two pages of fine print (like the trademark acknowledgement > page) in your distributed docuemntation. Shouldn't a file listing copyright lines be enough? I.e, he doesn't really have to print it? > Anyone else: feel free to correct me if you interpret the distribution > terms differently. That's about it. My understanding of the Berkeley license is that it doesn't differ much from public-domain. The only difference is the above mentioned point #3. As far as GPL'd parts are concerned, the jury is still out. /Alby > Terry Lambert