From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 11 11:15:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC65216A4BF for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from daemon.uop.edu (daemon.uop.edu [138.9.200.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1EE943F93 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:15:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wfroning@angui.sh) Received: from daemon (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daemon.uop.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h8BIFjQB073853 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:15:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wfroning@angui.sh) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:15:44 -0700 From: Will Froning To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20030911111544.10ce1679.wfroning@angui.sh> In-Reply-To: <3F60B2B4.7040709@madness.at> References: <00b201c37888$cec24770$1916c60a@win2k.clickcom.com> <3F60B2B4.7040709@madness.at> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Performance Problems.. Server hardware smoked by $500 box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:15:48 -0000 On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:36:52 +0200 Alexander Marx wrote: > John Straiton wrote: > >>Look at network errors (netstat -i), duplex mismatches (link > >>lights on switch vs. what ifconfig tells you), and network > >>load (i.e. production is on a 10Mb hub, development is on a > >>100Mb switch). Etc., etc., etc. > > > > > > They are all connected to the same switch, and the Cisco IOS reports > > zero errors on any of the 3 interfaces. Even when the production > > machine was live, it would have less than 3Mb/sec load on a > > 100Mbit/FullDuplex network. > > > thats great and all .. but does the server also report zero > interface errors? (output of netstat -in) ? > > we had lots of problems with cisco switches and half/full-duplex > missmatches ... even though the switches thought everything was fine. I'll agree w/ the above statement. We force full-duplex on both the switch and via rc.conf for all of our FreeBSD boxes. Will -- Will Froning Unix Sys. Admin., Lt. Pimp wfroning@angui.sh