From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Oct  6 20:43:46 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA22044
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 20:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions)
Received: from zoom.bga.com (root@zoom.realtime.net [205.238.128.40])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id UAA22029
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 20:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jktheowl@bga.com)
Received: from barnowl (apm3-137.realtime.net [205.238.146.137]) by zoom.bga.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA28386; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 22:42:24 -0500
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 22:46:16 -0500 (CDT)
From: John Kenagy <jktheowl@bga.com>
X-Sender: jktheowl@barnowl
To: Andy Pendry <Andy.P@cableinet.co.uk>
cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Is there anyhting better than uemacs
In-Reply-To: <34395437.50B0@cableinet.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.971006224520.352A-100000@barnowl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Sure,

emacs - the real thing, in the ports and as a package.

John

On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Andy Pendry wrote:

> Is there a better editor than uemacs for freeBSD?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Andy Pendry
> 
>