From owner-freebsd-isdn Thu Mar 4 15: 1:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from linteuto.teuto.de (linteuto.teuto.de [194.77.23.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB9215051 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 15:01:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from martin@rumolt.teuto.de) Received: from rumolt.teuto.de (root@rumolt.teuto.de [212.8.203.81]) by linteuto.teuto.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA08939; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 00:00:52 +0100 Received: from martins (hwart.teuto.de [212.8.203.83]) by rumolt.teuto.de (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id XAA03071; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 23:45:50 +0100 (MET) From: "Martin Husemann" To: "Wilko Bulte" , Cc: Subject: RE: urgh?? Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 23:45:49 +0100 Message-ID: <000a01be6690$bfb0c770$53cb08d4@martins.teuto.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <199903021819.TAA00804@yedi.iaf.nl> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Dutch PTT alright. What I don't get that I could call my one analog phone > with the other one (each on a different TA BTW) while i4b reported the > congestion thingy. Obviously I could only test this at 'almost' the same > time ;-) They might assign different priorities to different bearer capabilities - if you request 64 kBit/s transparent data they'll need that bandwith, if it's only voice you might not notice a slightly smaller bandwith than promissed ;-) Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message