Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:49:40 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ? Message-ID: <xzpptdlfbzf.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <E1Agop2-0005zX-Vy@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk> (Pete French's message of "Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:28:52 %2B0000") References: <E1Agop2-0005zX-Vy@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com> writes: > > tag =3D . > Err, wont that just grab the ports tree as it currently is, rather than t= he > tree as it was at the point when 5.2 RELEASE was created ? Yes. So? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpptdlfbzf.fsf>