From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 07:49:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DFB16A4CE for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:49:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AF543D31 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:49:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id D1929530A; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:49:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 1993D5309; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:49:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id C553133C6A; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:49:40 +0100 (CET) To: Pete French References: From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:49:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Pete French's message of "Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:28:52 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: ss X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.61 cc: veldy@veldy.net cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:49:52 -0000 Pete French writes: > > tag =3D . > Err, wont that just grab the ports tree as it currently is, rather than t= he > tree as it was at the point when 5.2 RELEASE was created ? Yes. So? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no