From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 19 19:58:48 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C44E1065670
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:58:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86BD8FC15
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:58:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5JJwgSL023370;
	Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:58:42 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5JJwgRr023363; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:58:42 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:58:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <20120619205225.21d6709f.freebsd@edvax.de>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206192154110.98802@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<CAH3a3KWKNF5Bt-8=KgtbMh=rV6GfUO7OaeE6-SutxkcRe8cG3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191953280.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20120619205225.21d6709f.freebsd@edvax.de>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:58:42 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Why Clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:58:48 -0000

>>
>> Does GPLv3 does force programs you compile with gcc to be GPLed?
>
> As far as I know, the main difference is that the GPLv3 is
> often called a "viral license". Software linking against v3
> libraries and so maybe programs compiled by a v3 compiler
> will have - according to the license - to be released as
> v3 too.
This word: "MAYBE" is most crucial here.

wouldn't it be just simplest solution to ask GNU leader for clearing it 
out?

i wouldn't be surprised that FreeBSD team would decide to go back to gcc 
soon.